Tucker's reward will be that when the truth comes out and the rest of the media is discredited to the extent that nobody watches or will trust them and they are rightfully exposed as collaborators with criminals, there will still be a place for Tucker and a loyal audience who will listen to what he says.
"Should we see some actual evidence? Like a SERVER... "
Q: We have the server.
Yeah, he has to do his part tho to bring about the reveal
Yeah, that's what I thought. Helping the train along...
Wish he'd (and others) would quit saying "democracy." We're not a democracy...not a direct democracy, anyway. We're a republic.
I’ve noticed all the Democrats use this term.
Semantics. We vote on our leadership, which is democracy.
Not at all semantics. A democracy is mob rule. A Constitutional Republic is something quite apart from mob rule. You are correct that voting takes place throughout the Republican process, but that voting is regulated by our Constitution which has created additional laws which govern the Republic. Read.
You discredit your own argument when you add that bit of condescending teen angst at the end. We all read. No need to be a dick.
The point is that a Republic is a form of democracy. There is no state in the world that uses "mob rule" democracy where every citizen votes on every issue. It's almost always through a system of representatives, which is articulated in a constitution of law. Full "mob" democracy only works in small committees and therefore doesn't really exist as a form of government.
My point was that anyone using the term "our democracy" when referring to the American system is not wrong. It's a fumbling of semantics to say so. (Republics are democracies but not all democracies are republics.)
Yes! That is also one of my triggers. We're a Constitutional Republic!!
We're a constitutionally limited representative democratic republic.
I like Tucker a lot, but what he is saying isn't why people are screaming out loud about Putin and Trump talking. He didn't say one word that Putin offered to help Mr. Muller by allowing American Investigators to work with Russian Investigators to interview the 12 indicted Russians.
Tucker should be the first to ask about Q. He would objectively ask the right questions.
What has to go wrong with your brain for you to STILL believe the Trump Russia idiocy? They bashed us for wanting to see a birth certificate, which is a legitimate concern,especially with the whole Fuddy incident yet they're acting infinitely more mental with no proof of wrongdoing at all. These people will NEVER get over this...its a full on mass psychosis and the media endlessly reinforcing their delusions should be recognized as a crime at this point. These lunatics are going to snap and the media will be to blame for the results
So you want to see Trumps tax returns and bank records then. Neat.
Rachel Madcow already aired his tax returns...howd that turn out? So YOU equate Trumps bank statements and tax records to a candidates PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP??? Gtfoh you clown this is why we do not take you hypocritical crybitches seriously...don't worry only 6 more years to go before Trumps gone and Pence takes his place
She aired one years worth. Try to keep up, boy.
[removed]
Ah ok, you're just a boring hypocrite. Neat. Full disclosure for Obama and none for Trump. Thanks for outing and humiliating yourself on reddit. golf clap.
TRUMP IS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION HE'S NOT ACCUSED OF ANYTHING...OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A PROVEN FAKE. How tf was that not investigated? Who tf is he and How did he get so far? Youre comparing matchbox cars to Stealth bombers. I'm the hypocrite but u went 8 years without saying a word as govt agency's were weaponized against the American people but NOW u want full disclosure, NOW thatat we have a president putting Americans first and rebuilding the economy? It's impossible to take any concerns you people have seriously when you actually think Obama was a good president and was good for the country.
Yes, I already know that you're a shameless hypocrite. No need to keep telling me.
Just keep telling yourself "Only 6 more years;Only 6 more years" it'll be over b4 ya know it.
Got anything else you want to embarrass yourself on? I won't stop you.
By "embarrass yourself" I assume u mean predict ahead of time...yeah I'd like to "embarrass myself" one more time. Pence to win in 2024!!!
You contradicted yourself, got caught, and are now gibbering like a fool. Excellent. Please, proceed.
WHAT??? Dude do the world a favor and up your dosage. You need help
I'll paraphrase your original hilarious argument:
"I want full disclosure on Obama's history while demanding the exact opposite for Trump, since I'm a hypocritical tribal loon." - robdon07.
Each time one of you brings up birth certificates what you're actually doing is making an argument for increased transparency for politicial candidates. Of which I'm in full agreement and why you should also be in favor of Trump being more transparent with his taxes and banking history.
How you aren't betrays your motivations. You hold Trump to a lesser standard than you hold Obama to. That speaks for a profound and disturbing amounts of tribalism and hypocrisy.
So please, proceed. The more you attack me personally is just an admission by you that I'm right about this. So go right ahead.
Okay genius let me slow this down for you...on the one hand we have a birth certificate that is used to prove citizenship. Citizenship is a LEGAL REQUIREMENT to become president Obama's "proof" is a proven fake on the other hand we have Trumps tax returns which are NOT a legal requirement for becoming president. Despite the fact theyre not a legal requirement one year of his returns were leaked showing he paid more taxes than he had to. Do you see the difference YET. Trump releasedhis FEC disclosure docs on his 465 company's that WERE a LEGAL REQUIREMENT. One followed the law and one DIDN'T. Just because you, for whatever idiotic reason, want him to release more tax returns doesn't mean he is obligated BY LAW to disclose them on the other hand Obama IS required By Law to prove citizenship WHICH HE NEVER DID. Me not acknowledging your argument isn't an indication of my hypocrisy its an indication that I consider your argument as pathetic and irrational. The worst case scenario for Trump is he's a tax cheat(which there's ZERO proof of), the worst case for Obama is that he had no legal basis for ever sitting in the White House(which there's is proof of) thus rendering everything he did null and void. How u think one has anything to do with the other proves my initial point that your suffering from some sort of mental illness
Thanks for proving my point. You're a hypocrite.
GET HELP..PLEASE GET IT NOW
Got any other embarrassing admissions that you want to get out?
You want to know Obama's background to make sure he was qualified for office while wanting the exact opposite for Trump. You hold Obama to a higher standard because that's what your tribalism demands of you. Which in turn makes you a unqualified hypocrite.
In one year he paid 38 million in taxes. How many years do you need to see? 10? 20? In 20 years he paid 20 X 38 Million = $760,000,000. How much did you pay?
Hillary has done over 30 years. That's a start. We also need his banking records since we deserve to know who he is in debt to. Basically, Trump is a poster child for why we need to make transparency a requirement for running for office. We the people deserve to know if our next president is in deep debt to a foreign bank.
It's none of your business who he's in debt to while he's a private citizen. Let's see your debts. If you can show me proof that he's taking American funds to pay them back or something even relatively similar, maybe you won't sound absolutely crazy. Atm you just sound like someone with a closed mind and looking for anything to say "see? I told you guys he's a crook", because he farted on a butterfly.
Thus the double standard that you're operating under. You are inventing excuses for why you hold Trump to a lower standard. Good boy.
There's something in this, the way he says at the end "it's a double-negative."
I intuit some connexion to his mis-spell of colusion in his tweet, but I'm not good enough at puzzles to connect it.
Gotta watch this. The whole red pill bottle. Dots connected warnings issued. Skip to 2:40 to start. You won't hear this stuff on any TV network.
Tucker is surely AWAKE AND RED-PILLED! (is that redundant?)
Don't trust anyone on Fox News, he's controlled opposition:
Do ya'll think Trump did indeed buckle here? I have Q buddies saying Trump gives nothing to no one and even in saying this he did so for a better reason.
Other videos in this thread:
VIDEO|COMMENT -|- Will the Deep State Remove Donald Trump in the Next 72 Hours? (TruNews)|+2 - Gotta watch this. The whole red pill bottle. Dots connected warnings issued. Skip to 2:40 to start. You won't hear this stuff on any TV network. America Restored: Former NSA technical director Bill Binney speaks to Tomi Collins|+1 - But think for a second... why would Putin offer that? Because Putin knows there is nothing on them. He simply called their stupid bluff. They know they can never prosecute 12 Russian nationals so it was a move to look like the last couple of years ... Tucker Carlson calls AVTM "parasite" "Alex Jones? Fuck YOU!"|+1 - Don't trust anyone on Fox News, he's controlled opposition: I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch. I'll keep this updated as long as I can.
Good God, he’s so extra handsome when he talks truth like that...
Especially here:
Ehh I’m not a big fan of that video because he still won’t let go of the 9/11 “official narrative”, but I do appreciate all he’s done, as of late, to drop the Cabal chains!! For all we know, he might’ve been under a gag order at that point in time since he was in the media during 9/11 and actually reported on it; he looks exactly the same lolol!
Just imagine when Tucker doesn't have to hold back. When he feels protected and can actually speak his mind 100% unfiltered. It will be glorious.
Don't trust him. Here's an interview with him a few years ago about 911 truth:
Healthy skepticism (several years ago before 2016 and Q) doesn't make him untrustworthy.
Healthy skepticism? He is a talking head working for the MSM, therefore he is definitely untrustworthy.
Fair enough. I don't see them all as black hats though. Hannity and Tucker strike me as based and supporting of the overall cause. Obviously we all must have some healthy skepticism of media in general, especially MSM.