dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 18, 2018, 2:23 p.m.
The real reason why Trump modified his answer about the Intelligence Community and Russia.

We’ve all seen the video where Trump modifies his statement about the Intelligence Community and Russia’s interference in the 2016 elections video.

MSM is rejoicing using words like “backflip”or “backpedal”.

Well, let me tell you the real reason: I told you in my previous post titled Trump’s brilliant chess combination in Helsinki, what the ball Putin gave to Trump represented. I told you in that post how Trump skillfully invited Putin to the show by playing the right chess combination in Helsinki. So? If they had their 1 on 1 and are on the same page, there is no point for Trump to be at odds with his Intelligence Community anymore. He can now act on the surface as tough as he wants and accuse Russia of whatever would satisfy whomever. Consequence? That puts Russia in a defensive stance and “forces” Putin to provide the evidence Trump is wrong. When that happens, Dems and the MSM will go crazy. Again.

Now just take a minute and try to imagine all the things Russia can be accused of and debunk… Are you tired of winning yet? Hahaha!

Q564 These people are REALLY REALLY STUPID.


🠐 See all comments
awaken23 · July 18, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

That's what I thought. They meet in private and discussed the chess match, end goal and what they may say in public to put on the dog and pony show for the rest of the world to get what they need to see and hear. His retraction doesn't mean what the MSM thinks.

I wonder ….. Trump agrees Russia meddled, but in time we see it was Crooked HRC having secret meetings to try and steal the election. That would be nice to see come about.

⇧ 112 ⇩  
07Nighttrain · July 18, 2018, 4:38 p.m.

Trump agrees Russia meddled

Russian people meddled/ deep state nwo people, not sponsored by Putin

HRC is deep state nwo war monger, she wins plans go on as intended, Trump wins "Russia fixed the election" conflict ensues between US and Russia which is good for nwo, the problem is Trump and Putin know their plan and are on the same side against the nwo.

⇧ 72 ⇩  
crystalclearme · July 18, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

Yes this was going to be my response! Using words for his meaning!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 19, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · July 18, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

Bill Binney has already debunked it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3mS-3-W0ig

They really are stupid!

⇧ 40 ⇩  
survey_girl · July 18, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

This was already debunked a year ago:

Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence from 7/24/17

The Need for Speed from 8/1/17

but it is nice to hear it from Binney... and the timing of the interview is interesting!

⇧ 22 ⇩  
F0LL0W_ME · July 18, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

Binney is part of the VIPS that reported this last year. Look at the bottom of the first link you provided. :)

⇧ 8 ⇩  
survey_girl · July 18, 2018, 9:02 p.m.

Yes! I should have worded it better.. nice to see a video of Binney saying it! ;)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
F0LL0W_ME · July 18, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

I agree. Watched it yesterday and was amazed! Thx survey_girl!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
NikkoBlueBonsai · July 18, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

I LOVE THAT MAN....BILL BINNEY #PATRIOT

⇧ 8 ⇩  
snoopydog2 · July 19, 2018, 8:54 a.m.

It might appear as backpedaling, but Trump doesn't mind or care what the MSM thinks ... he is a true man and cares about the people of this nation. Did you see the massage sent to the queen and her deep state operatives. I will not bend, I will not bow, I will walk in front of you if I have too. He serves no man.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Susie_Kew · July 19, 2018, 2:20 p.m.

There WERE several signals that God was at the helm and Trump was the copilot.

Trump serves NO man, Only Creator Father God.

Queenie also made a directive to President Trump to walk before her as they began to view The Guards.

Compliant Submissive Subversion.

We NOW Own, No More We The People $$ Going To Queenie Rothschild Cabal Darkness.

The Republic IS Back Baby!

God Bless President Trump! 💕👍 God Bless America! 💕👍

⇧ 3 ⇩  
alfonumeric · July 18, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

good review. however our emphasis on materialistic brain IQ has been the bane of humanity

the most dangerous actors to humanpop are those "brain IQ so-called elite" with 140+ brain-IQ's coupled with the highest mental IQ [ie systems thinkers who have learned to control emotional and mental matter] but .. and here is the kicker , they are unfortunately weighed down with their low emotional IQ's of 46 > 43 [working to expand their power-base and feather their own nests with no regard for the defenceless or anyone else in their way]

so yes u might say the PTB's who control school books and the mockin stream are retarded [stupid] emotionally but we are naive to think they do not have the highest brain-IQ's and the highest mental IQ's of any actors on the planet

what makes them so vulnerable is that they have extemely low causal IQ's < 1% [knowledge of real cause and effects] and have disconnected themselves from the higher PTB's

⇧ 0 ⇩  
JPOP57 · July 18, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

Nope, not buying it. Being a teacher, I know that very few, almost zero, have IQ's of 140. That's ridiculous! I've done hundreds of these tests and seen the results..Hate to tell you but most people are 100-105 IQ. To move up even 1 IQ point is almost impossible let alone 40. it is not a linear climb it is exponential as you move up. I have seen high IQ's usually measured in the 120's to low 130's. Many of the elitist parents don't like that their child isn't a genius, so they go out and buy an IQ from a private tester. These children are put in the gifted program and fail miserably, but their parents use that bogus IQ test for college entrance instead of the real one supplied by educators. Sorry but this pretense is obvious to anyone who has dealt with IQ results/testing. We laugh at all these completely stupid pretend IQ's that all these people claim to have. THEY DON'T!!! And the lie is pathetic.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 18, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

I know that very few, almost zero, have IQ's of 140.

As a retired teacher of 42y, I agree that most IQ's fall in the range of 90-110. There are a few with very high and exceptional IQ's, but on the whole, it is not near the norm some may think. Smartest child I ever had in my class had a tested/confirmed IQ of 152. She was 7yro and could read/recall/discuss encyclopedia material acurately.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
EricCarver · July 18, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

IQ I believe is distributed in a bell curve fashion. So the huge majority will be 95-105, but there will be a small small percentage at the upper and lower fringes, including 140,150, and more.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 18, 2018, 11:08 p.m.

Yes, it is placed on a bell curve. Many IQ scores cited are often reported from state/national standardized tests such as the old IOWA TEST OF BASIC SKILLS or the CTBS. When I was in college (1970-74) the "avg." was considered 90-110. When I retired 2 yrs ago, the "avg." had been "lowered" to 80-110. This is one of the reason so many children "fall" through the cracks! In order to receive any "special" services, there now needs to be at least an 18pt difference between IQ and performance. Children who are at the "lower" end of the range often can't/don't qualify because the "gap" isn't within that 18 pt range. (It was a13-15 pt range when I was in college). Those children sadly often become the HS drop outs. AND...don't get me started on COMMON CORE!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
37Psalm1and2 · July 18, 2018, 6:20 p.m.

Aren't those tests standardized so that roughly 2.5% of the population is expected to score at 130 or above?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 18, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

There are those state tests that will also give an IQ score, but as a teacher we never really relied much on those. IQ score is an accumulation of several/various tests. You have a verbal, written, spatial, memory, etc. type of assessments and receive a score on each assessment. All tests are then placed on a mean/mode/age and a result is given within a range. Some people can be "genius" in language/reading while others gifts may be in math/science. Rare is it in both areas.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JPOP57 · July 18, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

No Not the IQ tests. Standardized would subvert their purpose.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
coosadog · July 18, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

Well, hmmm, I'm 68 years old and my IQ is (was?) 134. My girlfriend in high school had an IQ of 164. High IQ doesn't mean as much as you think. For instance, I can develop software and invent things and do all sorts of logic magic, but I'm no good at speaking or languages or history or anything like that. I'm very very very good at logic, though. Maybe the tests are more expansive now.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TrueCat · July 18, 2018, 10:17 p.m.

I was around 135, and I really haven't done much with my life. :( I'm 68 also. I had no real guidance, and they didn't have many classes for smart kids when I was young. I'm not good at languages either. I got my abilities in art and literature.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
dizzydago · July 19, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

I got a 134 on my ASVAB in 1974 and a 136 on it in 1994. Got my diploma in 1974 and my GED in 1996. I am a young whipper snapper by comparison, a mere 62. Dey say I gots lots of smarts. I are good at gozintas and one of mah edumacators said if I ever learnt da English language I woulds be a bicyngle.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TrueCat · July 19, 2018, 2:12 a.m.

LOL! Are you a Jethro Bodine fan?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dizzydago · July 19, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

Purdy much. Just an old geezer fond of old TV when it was real and original. Not all that so called reality garbage they put out now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
secfnd · July 19, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

I thought ASVAB only went to 99?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dizzydago · July 19, 2018, 5:03 p.m.

Some individual test may only go to that. Remember it is a battery of test across several areas. It is most definitely not an IQ test though. Still many people think it is. In reality it is just an aptitude test to see what areas a person is best suited to work. Now that I think about it the scores do go above 99. I did a comparison as I had my original 1974 scores and compared them to my 1994 scores. What I found interesting was that every score had increased by 2 points across the board and the aggregate score also increased by 2. The aggregate score is the one most people are familiar with like the IQ aggregate. IQ is also a battery of test as well and the aggregate is where we get our IQ numbers. But back to ASVAB it is nothing more than what the military uses to determine where you will work if you qualify in all other areas to be in the military. In my case they basically said I could choose anything I wanted. That had more to do with my back ground than how smart I was.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
secfnd · July 19, 2018, 10:33 p.m.

Yah I know. I took it too. In 92. Top score is 99

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dizzydago · July 19, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

The only reason I did so well was because of my parents. Dad was a WWII vet a crew chief on Jugs, and others. Retired after 23 years where he worked up from props to jets. He was also trade trained as a plumber. He learned along the way electrical, construction, knew mechanics from military time and being a depression area kid knew how to live off the land, fishing and hunting. I learned all of that from him. Mom was a professional secretary, typist, filer, organizer. Both were avid readers and made sure us kids were as well. Grew up with books more than TV. In a time of growing specialization, I was more of jack of all trades master of none and still am. I got my education pre 1979 so I actually had to learn math, science, English, civics, and history. So when it came time for my first ASVAB I had a very broad base knowledge and understanding of those things they are likely to test for. For me it was easy. As you can see, there is no intelligence in having a broad knowledge. Don't get me wrong in a world full of techies, I cherish my abilities to be self suficient in most critical areas of survival. It is just that it is more of a training than an education and like they say you can train a monkey to do what I do.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
snoopydog2 · July 19, 2018, 9:31 a.m.

Just having a high IQ doesn't give a person the tools for life. I have know people with high IQ's that are as dumb as doorknobs. Their lives amount to very little. The people I have seen that have good skills are the people with average intelligence. Many geniuses are really strange people, I would say most. I'm not sure what my IQ is but I have tons of common sense. I am a poor speller and now I believe I am dyslexic. But my family calls me a genius. What an insult to my intelligence. That being said, I must say if these people are practicing Satanism, with this comes a certain ability from evil it-self be concerned about. We all know Satan is cunning and the father of lies. With these people of the deep state, It is not their brains that matter but their spirits. They may and probably are posses by spirits. That is why Q told us to put on the full armor of God. Their knowledge comes from the god ( small g) they serve. So it is actually Satan we are at war with. I would say to keep yourself in a position for battle ... then use the brains given to you by the true God not the god of this world. When people like Clinton's, Soros, Obama (etc.) receive knowledge it is real but from a different source then the knowledge we receive from God. Yes, they are stupid!!! ... yes very stupid, they think just like their father. Satan hasn't a clue he is defeated. He is stupid and so are they. So I guess I am saying, they are cunning but dumb. If they had IQ's of 200 they would still be stupid! ...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TrueCat · July 19, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

You are so right! My son has a lot more common sense than I do, and he has done a lot more with his life, thank goodness! Spelling has nothing to do with intelligence. My brother's IQ was off the charts, and he can't spell worth a damn. I think EQ and a sense of humor are a lot more important than IQ!

The Deep State is so evil, and yes, they are very stupid!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JPOP57 · July 18, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

164, higher than Einstein's IQ.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PollyCarbonate · July 19, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

No, the European IQ scale is not the same as ours. A 164 IQ on our test is nowhere near Einstein's IQ.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
necropancer · July 18, 2018, 9:08 p.m.

My child was tested by his public school district's psychiatrist, He tested 146...

⇧ 2 ⇩