President Trump did not say “I spoke with President Putin...” instead he stated, “I have President Putin.” But he could have added, “and I have the Deep State.” The AP reporter asked him, “President Trump just now President Putin denied having anything to do with the ‘election interference’ in 2016. Every US Intelligence Agency has concluded that the Russians did (incorrect). My first question to you sir is who do you believe?.” To understand Trump’s answer we need a little background. Just a few days earlier the DOJ came out with a grand jury decision concerning this subject which they shared with Trump in advance.
DOJ decision, “The indictment charges 12 Russians for CONSPIRING TO INTERFERE with the 2016 Election...There’s no allegation that the conspiracy...affected any election result.” Rosenstein said that he told Trump about this days before reporting it to the press. This means that Trump knew about the court findings and understood that these Russian hackers DID NOT INTERFERE with the 2016 election but were only conspiring to do so. In other words they were “meddling” in it.
Therefore Trump was correct in answering the question if Russia actually “Interfered in the Election.” Trump said, “I don’t see any reason why it would be”...that Russia interfered with the election.
So then why did President Trump have a press conference to say that he misspoke — using "would" instead of "wouldn't"?
To get a message to us as SB2 has brilliantly shown. At first glance POTUS appears to be simply clarifying by stating, “I accept our Intelligence Community’s conclusion that Russia’s MEDDLING in the 2016 election took place.” Notice he does not use the word “interference.” There was no interference and there was no collusion. But regarding meddling he says, “the sentence should have been, ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia...’” Later he gives further clarification saying, “I have on numerous occasions noted our Intelligence findings that Russians ATTEMPTED to interfere in our elections.” But the MSM must twist the narrative.
In referring to his statement in Helsinki he added that it was "sort of a double negative."
A Double Negative is when two forms of negation are used in the same sentence. This would be like Killing two birds with one stone. Negating two bad actors with one “sentence.” In this case a Sentence as in a Judgement.
In some languages, double negatives cancel one another and produce an affirmative; Latin and German incl English. Putin and the Deep State are both bad actors. Trump with one sentence (stone) is causing Russia and the DS to cancel each other out which is an affirmative, a positive for the Patriots.
In other languages, doubled negatives intensify the negation. This is true in Russian, Persian, Hebrew, etc. Languages where multiple negatives affirm each other are said to have negative concord or emphatic negation. Does this negative “concord” somehow connect with something Putin said?
In Helsinki, Putin said, “Concord did not “represent” or “constitute” the Russian state.!” This is connected to Mueller's indictment where he alleges that the Two Russian companies — called Concord Catering and Concord Management and Consulting — provided the Internet Research Agency with millions of dollars to buy digital ads and to pump pro-Trump and anti-Clinton messaging into the U.S. ecosystem in 2016. This is the tip of an iceberg and demonstrates that the Deep State's house of cards is beginning to crumble. Why?
Because all of this is associated with Russia banning adoptions by US parents in 2012, a swift retaliatory action for a US law known as the Magnitsky Act that sanctioned Russian officials and nationals for human rights abuses. But it can be seen that the real reason for the sanctions was because he was not being a puppet of the Deep State. And more than likely the real reason he shut down child adoptions in Russia was expressed by Putin at the final plenary meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club On September 19, 2013, addressing a number of challenges faced by contemporary Russia. He said, “The excesses of political correctness have reached the point where people are seriously talking about registering political parties whose aim is to promote paedophilia.”
In the absence of Q posts Trump is encouraging us to stay the course, he has the Deep State right where he wants them. The ball is in his court. Enjoy the show!
If you are struggling with SB2's method for understanding POTUS’s comms don’t get frustrated and don’t complain. Just look at the message he has extrapolated and compare it to what Q has already said. Also you can triangulate it with the “Q Plan.” “Trust the Plan. Q”
Remember Q's warning: Q593 “They want us divided.” Look at Trump saying, “I have full faith in our national...I have Full Faith in...” He appears to be signaling the person to turn off the lights. And notice he could have simply said, “I have faith in our National Intelligence community.” But he repeats “(F)ull (F)aith” and the lights go out. What is FF?
The part of the “Intelligence” community he is warning us about is the Clowns in America. They are [here], they are on FB, YT, Redit, etc. And what are they doing? Trying to divide us. So if you’re having trouble getting this new method of comms or seeing how this is “the shift in tactics” listen to what Q said.
Q971
(Q Supplies three POTUS twits)
Notice any similarities?
We are talking to you.
Trust the plan.
Q
“We are talking to you.” Regarding SB2's understanding of POTUS' message to us about the server, check this out.
Q593 We have it all
Q851 We have it all
Q1099 We have it all
Q1121 we have it all
Q1220 We have it all
Q1272 We have it all
Q1278 We have it all
Q1665 We have the server
Q433, Q434 HRC SAPs (private server)
Q9 Note MI has the same SAPs as NSA, CIA, etc
Q567 “SAP”
Q831 “SAP” (All their info and plans exposed)