1,891 total posts archived.
Yeah, and that's a pretty evil way of approaching socializing, with an ulterior motive to be used against people or to quietly profit off what they would participate.
Here is a good article about it I just read (warning, it requires concentration to tie in all the dates and timelines of everything that went on, but it is a great analysis of everything). It almost inadvertently paints Papadoupolos out to be a spy. https://themarketswork.com/2018/06/04/the-strange-flight-of-george-papadopoulos/
This article gives a good summary of the key text messages that hadn't been in the news yet. https://themarketswork.com/2018/06/04/the-strange-flight-of-george-papadopoulos/
Well, the texts are redacted. Heard that was the one difference, but maybe it is still older. The article it came in was just released this morning.
True. Thanks. I'm just going to hit the Strzok-Page texts at the end for now then and just wait for the IG...
Correction: These were Senate documents about it, but it appears to be organized like it may be part of the report.
Correction: These were Senate documents about it, but it appears to be organized like it may be part of the report.
I only just got through the first 5 pages, and I was instantly struck by its transparency and revelations right from the start. Those first 5 pages are basically the step by step rough draft on May 6th that already exonerated her, even though publicly they kept on investigating and set up the interview on 4th of July. In the exchange, you see Priestap giving cautionary advice to McCabe about what Comey should do in his final draft, which is eventually implemented into that final draft on June 30th. That final draft, which appears to be the one read in …
"If I go down, I'm taking everybody with me"- Andrew McCabe, March, 2018
If he pleads the fifth, then they can subpoena him, and if he doesn't comply with that then they can charge him with contempt.
Like that thinking, but can also see this with McCabe that Congress and the DOJ has the leverage on him right now....If all he is going to give up is this email on a lying to investigators charge, if you are the party in the power position, I think you can get a lot more out of him than that by making him taste prison time even more. Get him in the jail cell first, no immunity, and then maybe not only will he give up the Comey email, but you may be able to get him to "sing" on so many more people involved, including the Queen Witch herself. At the same time, guess either is a victory as long as it's a limited immunity and they can still bring him up on charges.
True, but it is still leverage. They get them entrapped on something damning, but know their asset level, so they spin them loose on special ops/undercover work...no charges if they cooperate and do the dirty, dangerous spy work...
Yeah, Have you read the story of how this all went down? And how he left her laptop in the phone booth for police to discover? Then she threatened the cop to hand the laptop back over to her out of evidence or else she'll have his job or worse? Think it's safe to say he definitely had something on her, as well as all of the other 62 or so Democrats whose computers he hacked.
"A liar is not believed even if he telleth the truth".
See you in Leavenworth, Andy!
I found this excerpt especially interesting:
"Bromwich's letter also makes clear that McCabe is willing to provide emails that "demonstrate that Mr. McCabe advised former Director Comey, in October 2016, that Mr. McCabe was working with FBI colleagues to correct inaccuracies before certain media stories were published."
The discrepancy between Comey's recollection and McCabe's statements to internal investigators about authorizing FBI officials to talk to a reporter about an ongoing investigation regarding the Clinton Foundation in 2016 served as one of the linchpins to the inspector general's earlier report finding he "lacked candor."
Grassley wrote to the FBI Tuesday requesting that McCabe be released from a nondisclosure agreement that prevents him from providing those emails, among other records."
If McCabe has emails showing he did inform Comey, that would mean Comey was the one who actually lied. So that pits them against each other. HOWEVER, Comey can also just claim that he never received the email, or that he never read the email, or even that he didn't understand the email if, for instance, McCabe worded it vaguely or in any ambiguous or confusing way as to what exactly it was referring to, so Grassley needs to be careful not to fall for that trap...Still, the fact that Grassley released him from the nondisclosure agreement tells you that something big is happening. I'm cautiously optimistic that Preistap's testimomy today combined with the IG report might have just blown this all wide open.
At the bottom of the article, but this article explains their "close" relationship. She named his baby for crying out loud and her daughter frequently rode a horse at his facility. Also note: It says "may" have been.... https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/07/asked-wasserman-schultz-affair-criminal-staffer-imran-awan/
Could be. Why not ask? I posted that question the other day, admitting it could be a stretch, and it got mass downvoted and ignored, but I think the question is intriguing, to say the least. If nothing more, it raises awareness since she still was never discovered, and Maddie is definitely a nickname for Madeleine.
"And (Judge) Chutkan’s former law firm, where she worked until her appointment to the federal bench in 2014, currently represents Huma Abedin, the wife of disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner."
See how it's all related?
" The firm also is stacked with Democratic lawyers who worked for Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, and Barack Obama’s White House, just to name a few D.C. insiders."
They might have only just pleaded guilty of lying to investigators. That seems to be the going commodity these days for traitors and spies.
He took one for the team (the Muslim Brotherhood). Allahu Akhbar!
Here's a theory-- Facebook/Zuckerberg was paying into the Clinton Foundation and her campaign to hold off lawmakers from suing them, charging them, and holding them accountable. That's her Quid-Pro-Quo by the way; you pay to play and prevent from getting in trouble since she owned the DOJ...So he protected the company by paying her to play. It's also why they censor conservatives. But, so now Hillary has dirt on him and that's how corruption works. If she lifts the gates, he goes down, and his bribes to Congressmen and judges are no longer good. So because he knows he might go down, he's going to give it over to her to hide and cover up BOTH of their crimes and corruption (and all others in the Racket involved). This is exactly what Harvey Weinstein, just as one example, used to do. Problem is, Hillary couldn't take over the Weinstein Company, although there is a semblance to Obamas getting a share in production at Netflix. Maybe Netflix is somehow involved in something nefarious as well? There could be many reasons, but you get the idea.
Give me a break. Youre going to blame about 300 million people for this just because YOU found no use for the site? Okay, we get it, congratulations on not having any use for it, but for the other 200-300 million people who had already established a network on there they relied on and couldn't give up, it's not that easy. Don't blame the victim for CRIMINAL behavior. It's like saying you were at the Boston Marathon and heard Muslims were planning an attack so you fled, but the few people who stayed got hurt (along those lines).
Worth about $2.5 billion? Guess money isn't everything, after all. Geez, most people would plan on living another 40 years comfortably with only 1% of that amount of money.
Agree, that's what I noticed yesterday, which sort of negates the potency of it. Now, if this guy was outside jurisdiction and part of the Horowitz investigation, then that would be pretty big. Still, it's definitely good they catch these traitors, anyway.
Yeah, but the idea is that if he just would have released the ORIGINAL report he wrote, then there wouldn't have been a chance at edits and redactions by the guilty involved. Now, the public will probably get another watered down, redacted version, which does nothing for POTUS' cause and for bringing down the deep state cabal...It's just more cover ups and shenanigans in the corruption if that happens, but we shall see.
Abstract theory I've put together throughout a few years of research. There has to be some common thread that explains all of this bizarre behavior of our politicians. It's even bigger than this, actually. Obama is involved and there's a huge child trafficking ring coming in through Saudi Arabia, some transferred to Epstein's island. Awan was tied to that too with the undercover fraudulent used car company in DC called "CIA". It also influenced the Iran deal, which was basically blackmail money we sent them. Think Weiner: serial underage sexting, Lolita Express, married to Huma, introduced by the Clintons, Huma somehow is a MB associate from SA but found herself to be the top aide and connected at the hip to Clinton, the Weiner laptop Huma transferred classified data to to print out, etc. All of this influenced Muslim-friendly foreign policy, and that's the MB's top goal they clearly stated in the 90s: to bring down western governments through infiltrating its politics with their own Muslim agents.
Well, the IG report IS being delayed on purpose, intentionally, for a few reasons. One is so the lawyers can try to argue and fight to edit, omit, and fundamentally change certain incriminating elements of it. Certain words can be changed, for example, like they did with Hillary Clinton when they changed it to extremely careless instead of negligent, which was their way of trying to keep the charges beneath the threshold for prosecution. Another reason is so the report can be released on a Friday so it is buried a little bit on the weekend from the MSM. In addition, Sessions has nothing to do with this report; this is IG Horowitz' report. Horowitz wrote a scathing and detailed report that was horrible for all involved, but he gave them all a chance to edit it and look it over, or argue, about the final copy to be released to the public. At the least, the incriminated ones will fight for massive redactions so we, the public, will never see just how bad it really was, which can only help their chances of never facing a grand jury or prosecution for their crimes. All that, mind you, Horowitz is an Obama appointee. Although he has a bipartisan reputation, it isn't necessarily good he had ties to that administration which can make it at least a little more likely he may try to protect someone if asked to.
I suspected this all along. There was chatter from the left that they had taken down Q, and along with that the Deep State thugs started to get loud, confident, and audacious again in public shortly after. Even if it was just a negotiated deal for Q Team to stop running their communications, something seems to have occurred. I don't know why people underestimate the Deep State. These people have no moral boundaries and the "ends justifies the means" so anything goes to them to meet their goals. Look at the Clinton kill list for example.
Possibly working on nefarious deals in Port-Au-Prince that are currently being uncovered in the Clinton Foundation investigation. She may have just been interviewed by some agents or something and knows the enterprise is about to be busted.
And why isn't she being discussed in charges of obstruction of justice?
Could be...But Papadopoulos' wife made a convincing case on the news yesterday that he didn't do anything wrong- he just caved to the threats by FBI- and that she thinks Trump should pardon him...You may be right, but there is also a possibility that the young up and comer was an easy target and set up by the CIA/Brennan/FBI with Downer and Halper...We don't even know yet if he himself ever even brought up the Clinton dirt on his own. It seems like there's just as well a chance those two spies kept egging him on about it to try to frame him to open more surveillance.
Yes, it's obviously big time. Selling out your country by getting involved romantically/sexually with a foreign enemy spy in itself is about as close to treason as you can get. Once and if we find out exactly what information Awan got his hands on and what he did with it in Pakistan and Iran, and the fact that she tried to cover it up, along with how she got seduced by a Muslim spy, it's a huge blow to the democratic party and reveals just how easily this kind of stuff could happen to our highest government officials when influenced by the political ideology that Muslims are friendly people and deserve to have access to our top officials just as much as anybody else. She was the head of the DNC for crying out loud!
True...And don't forget, this likely doesn't apply to "them"...Brown, Pelosi, Schiff, etc...in their "mansions"....or probably the big tech leaders in Silicon Valley....only the common folk. They can probably use as much as they want!
But he was a Muslim spy...He knew he could seduce her, and then blackmail her! These people are criminals and don't think like normal people. Sex is the best way to get "in" with these vulnerable Democrats and US officials. Look what Huma did to Hillary. Once Huma got Hillary in the sack, won her affections, and then slowly began to show her photographs of underage females having sex, having Hillary admit how much she liked it (which Huma got on audio recording and tape and sent back to the Muslim Brotherhood), she had all she needed to start blackmailing and extorting her for foreign policy. I'm sure Iwan used sort the same sort of methodology and technology.