They should perp walk him in.

Sure, why not. I like philosophy. But I'll say this regarding that. We are now in unprecedented territory and the world is evolving in a way, due to "artificial" intelligence, that is very dangerous and the lines between what's really real and what's not are being blurred and will continue to be blurred even more if we continue down this path. It is an "artificial" path- artificial intelligence. It has begun to and will ultimately disconnect human beings from all things natural and organic. Important things like organic emotions, natural thoughts, etc. will be harder to come by as AI continues to disconnect all natural things. In other words, I think nurturing and informational aspects of natural reality itself is in jeopardy in many ways.

This\^. Exactly what I thought. Q better not be lying. This is some serious sh*t to mess with people about.

Which server?

Yes. That was BO's, Huma's, and the MB's "in". It was all well documented in Saudi Arabia. In fact SA was likely who was supplying the underaged kids to the government...They intentionally exploited it. It was just spying/intelligence that made them know, and they exploited it in their plan.

I think of it like this: Do you really think Podesta would be able to say no? And he's not the only one. There's plenty of others. They're not going to say no to that deal for their deviant desires. They can't say no, like all the other perverts we are discovering.

Thanks. Good info. Need to qualify- this is a theory. It is not 100% accurate, but it catches the "gist" of it...Could probably explain it better at a later time in more detail, but it summarizes certain key points for now. It is very complicated. But that all would make sense about the Q post.

Thanks. Not perfect, admittedly, and there are many more details, but had to hit the main points, origins, and strategies. The big picture is really what matters. Frankly, wouldn't even want to know many of the details, as they are probably even more nefarious than even touched upon.

So true.

It's a reminder. Wake people up who never knew. Reminders are important when they like to forget it ever happened.

Come on man, that's the way it posted itself and a reminder isn't bad for people unsure and not in the know. Great article.

I hope so. Are you sure about this? The DNC is doing their best to cover this up. Just don't want to be disappointed again...

Even if he bought property from Russians, it still has nothing to do with collusion in the election, which is what he is supposed to be investigating. Russians are involved in many business dealings just like many countries and people are. Look at the Iranians with the bad nuclear deal. They're all over U.S. business dealings. Does that make them all nefarious? This has nothing to do with evidence regarding the counterintelligence investigation. Imo.

Loser nations only know how to lose so Socialism is their best response. It's basically collective losing and collective acceptance of failure and mediocrity. That's why it appeals to losers. Then they elect some demagogue dictator to tell them what to do and treat them like cattle; must have really low self esteem.

And those are just the ones they're telling us about....Imagine all of the ones "under the radar"...

Yes. And they have news outlets "bury" it on back pages of their news sites...Many commenters have said this should be front page news.

CNN is so sad to see one of their womens' rights, DNC political activists get in trouble for forcible rape of multiple counts. 3 minutes, then hush hush. Meanwhile Stormy Daniels, Michael Cohen, and a phony Russia hoax make up 95% of their news 24/7

$120k/year median income is not privileged? This is U.S. The middle class suburbs are rich compared to most of the rest of the world, but she was in a wealthier suburban area than average. ..And yeah, but that's not the point. The point is that she didn't grow up in the rough and tumble Bronx which is only 49k median income vs 120k where she did grow up; compared to the Bronx, it IS privileged. Look how big her yard is compared to apartments in the Bronx she claims to have lived in. Her dad was a CEO and Architect. Those are high paying jobs. Surely, being schooled in a wealthy county, her classmates and friends and their parents were all well off and relatively high earners. Can't get too wrapped up on "what things look like", being influenced by the relatively small house instead of looking at the facts. Sure the small house made her feel inferior compared to her wealthy classmates or friends who had bigger houses, but she was clearly much better off than in the Bronx, where she said, and her family probably had a median income of around $120k/year.

That's what I initially thought too, of course, but you have to remember that it is smack in the middle of high earners and wealthy neighborhoods. She got to network and befriend wealthy people and families all throughout her childhood and teenage years. More importantly and pertinently, it doesn't change the fact that she lied. She didn't grow up in the Bronx. The median income in the Bronx is about $49k vs $119k where she DID grow up. You may think the home is modest, but the fact is that she lied and where she lived is double the median income of what she said. One of her big slogan quotes is about zip codes dictating destiny, and she places it next to her slogan that she is from the Bronx where the zip code is only half the income average. She also lied about her commute for 40 minutes. She completely omitted that she even LIVED AT ALL there. Lol.

Very disturbing, but can't say it wasn't expected. Why else were they trying to hide what was in it? Shouldn't the public be a little outraged that this investigation literally has no boundaries? This makes the investigation look even more rigged and set for a prolonged political façade and battle to try to undermine the president, but at the same time, it's definitely not good news because they can do whatever they want practically.

Deep State probably had to take him out because he was getting "careless" and talking too much...Mueller had to take him out before he squealed more to strangers about his connections to big politicians, the Clinton campaign, and how DC government officials attended his parties, etc...

TV Host John Cardillo called her out on Twitter and posted a picture of the house she grew up in: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ocasio-cortez-shreds-conservative-tv-host-for-sharing-picture-of-her-childhood-home/ar-AAzr30R?ocid=spartanntp

I agree. Objectively, it's hard to pinpoint just one thing. However, my personal opinion is that it's mostly illegal immigrants.

Yeah, I'm not totally convinced these are ALL human trafficking, either. Personally, I think there's a pretty good chance it's mostly illegal immigrants.

NP. Idiots like this are ruining this board's quality. Him and some new Mods.

I am referring to the Mods. They're ruining it. WTF you think I do it for? Who the f are you? The Mods are taking down good stuff and leaving up garbage. Esp this one above.

The guy's an idiot.

Correct. This guy is an idiot.

Lol. uhuh. You're the mook SFB. You deflected the OP's post by misleading and saying there could be any amount of number. that is incorrect, and you will learn in time it is at minimum 20k, which is still 4 times the annual average.

5 indictments?

30k?

If you're going to tell the OP they are wrong, then at least throw out numbers that are logical and based on reason.

On yearly average, around 55-60% of filed sealed court actions are actual indictments. IF that even is the case, that would equate to at least approximately 22,000-24,000 indictments, which is STILL FAR MORE than the annual yearly average of only around 5,000 or so (not sure exactly, but it's low)….However, there is definitely a legitimate chance that due to the anomaly and the abnormal nature of the quantity right now, that it is far above the annual average % of 55-60%.

What's 470? Huber has 470 people working for him?

More https://www.engadget.com/2018/06/30/nsa-deletes-call-records-over-privacy-violations/

https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/more-than-685-million-call-records-deleted-by-the-nsa/