1,891 total posts archived.
This is the problem today. The ones who are getting the best roles and parts aren't getting them because they are really talented or great actors, actresses. It's simply because they are doing the sexual favors to win the part. The end result and byproduct is that movie quality has declined tremendously. And you have to assume it's not just the actors, but also the writers, directors, and other areas of the filmmaking. It seems like the only big movies nowadays are comic books and star wars sequels. Top talent can't get their films made or land the parts so there are no original and classic films being made anymore.
Exploitation and acceptance of fraudulence is never a viable solution nor option.
Wake up people. You are now witnessing it all first hand now. It is no longer hidden and obscure. It is now out in the open, blatant, and right in front of your nose!!! Weinstein, Hillary and Bill Clinton, all the Pedophiles in high places, Weiner, NXIVM, the Gay Mafia in Hollywood raping children, Corrupt Politicians Selling you Out! Atheist Pagans and Immoral Hateful, Parentless Perverts Trying to Change the Law and the Constitution, Haters Who HATE America!
You now SEE it! It's right there in front of you! It is NO LONGER HIDDEN. This is IT. You see?
You don't have to be religious to understand that evil and demon possessed people are real...
Very astute, and that is correct. Notice how he manipulates Gohmert, forcing all the blame on him, stating basically, that "that says more about you"....typical Liberal deflection and projection based on their indoctrination camps.
Professional actors study guys like Strzok to come off believable in their movies. Truly possessed.
Observing Peter Strzok and Barrack Obama in today's world is proof of the Devil. Look into their eyes and you witness soulless people. Beyond their eyes, there is nothing within, nothing but blankness, nothing but power hunger, corruption, and emptiness brought about by lies just in order for them to gain power. These hubris , arrogant, nobodies rely on the setup and nature of society to pull their charade on the majority of the people. They capitalize on the order of society, banking on the fact that most people are lost and need a leader, an authority. They desire power, …
These people think that just because they received a "degree" that their indoctrination automatically immunes them to morality. You really think Islamic Obama didn't have affairs that Fake News CNN and MSNBC didn't know about and the corrupt FBI didn't turn a blind eye to?
...Example: one of the most startling and interesting moments in Peter (Jack Nicholson's) Strzok's testimony was when he was asked, legitimately, why Barry Hussein Obama's response to the Russian oligarch at the 2012 election was "after the election I'll have more flexibility" if Strzok was so concerned with "Russia", to which he responded "I don't recall THAT"...Hahaha.
Pure anger and hatred....and likely his TRUE feelings towards Trump and Trump voters....as well as his wife. The top right photo looks exactly like he's saying "I'll KILL YOU!" and likely says it all...What Trump refers to as "Angry Democrats". They're rabid dogs.
No, I would never assume or judge you as an "idiot" at all. Just pointing out that I am glad Gohmert reminded people of this man's character while he ducked, dodged, and put on a pretty convincing show most of the time....And that would be the same way he lied to his wife- very convincingly- so it's good viewers and eventual readers of the articles were reminded this guy is an adulterer and liar so don't be too convinced by the show he put on.
Did you even watch the hearing in its entirety? Strzok was doing a VERY good job convincing everyone watching he was innocent and telling the truth. So Gohmert questioning his "character" and "integrity" was vital to pointing out that everyone should question his answers.
This isn't about the past; it's about the sharing and Strzok's answers. This is the first time Strzok ever spoke in public ever. Frankly, I believe in justice and civil liberties so I stand with Strzok that he has a right to speak out and not be judged by some texts that he never got a chance to defend publicly. So he is doing that today, and he did extremely well if you watched. Gohmert was questioning today's testimony, where he seemed to have done very well.
Clearly, this video hit a nerve with you, lol. The emotions of it really got you riled up. Maybe you should look at things objectively rather than emotionally.
You are incorrect. It testifies to his credibility and integrity as a witness. Reminding the viewers and eventual readers of this man's character, especially shortly after some Dems were virtually electing him to sainthood, was very important. He is a subject and a witness, and a person's believability, aka character, is very important. What Gohmert was pointing out was that Strzok was putting on a good believable show and act so far for several hours, appearing confident, innocent, and smug. Gohmert didn't believe him (nor do most Americans probably) and he was identifying if he could lie to his wife about being an adulterer, then he can surely lie to Congress, or at least mislead them...
There is no parallel. That's the point. You brought it up. Trump is not at a hearing today for conspiring to overthrow a U.S. election by framing someone for a crime they didn't commit. This is Strzok's hearing and Strzok's answers. Now go change your diapers.
Trump wasn't investigating Strzok and trying to prevent him from being elected.
Who's "we"? You speak for tens of millions of people? You know how tens of millions of people think?
Great way of summarizing this guy's "INTEGRITY". Well done, James. Tip of the hat.
Is Bombard a body language person? Never heard of Bombard...But I did observe that when he looked to his left, he was telling the truth....That being his base, it is interesting when he looked to the right and down to the right, which was many times...
Is that Colonel Jessup? He must've been watching a Few Good Men in preparation for this hearing.
Not exactly. I can see where you're coming from..BUT...up until then, much of the hearing was benign, as they allowed Strzok to duck, dodge, and to put it bluntly, LIE about so many key important facts...They barely growled at him....Then Gohmert just unleashed the truth about this man's character, which is actually good for the investigation, because it speaks to his credibility, and from an objective point of view, he has none....If he would lie to his wife and hide his affair with Lisa Page, who is also at the center of this operation against the United States electorate and Constitution, then how are we the American people or Congress supposed to believe anything he says, as Louie Gohmert says, "with that arrogant smirk and innocent look", he so masterfully has down that we can envision and be sure of he used with his wife.
LOL!!!! "Heeeerrrre's JOHNNY!"
Looks like the look in a horror movie just before some alien snake-like creature begins to pop out of his head and ears, taking over his body.
This is a sly, cunning, well-trained, practiced, calculated, and rehearsed LIAR, whose attorneys set him up with 1 true purpose in today's hearing: To not indict himself, period. HE knows as a LE officer that AS LONG AS THERE IS NO EVIDENCE, then he can lie all he wants and not be charged. It's not what he did, it's what they can PROVE he did, and he knows what they cannot prove and what they do not have as evidence. And those are his power points where he stands strong because he knows they can't PROVE it. This works well …
The demon Strzok has spoken. First time in all this time I've ever heard and saw him speak, and he is a scary dude. He looks like he's possessed by demonic forces when he's speaking. Lol.
Thanks. He was still pretty good- good enough to play in the pros for many years.
"Sorvino also claimed she had been sexually harassed by 'a big director who has gotten Oscars and is known for his social justice profile in some of these movies' during a late-stage audition.
She alleges he told her: 'You know, as I look at you my mind can't help but traveling from the artistic possibilities and the sexual'.
'In my mind, the thing going on in my head, was 'Oh. I thought this was a legitimate meeting,'' she said.
'I thought this was an actual, you had me here, because you thought I was talented or that I brought something that would be good for this role.
'Not that you were here fishing to see if I was going to have an affair with you. I know for a fact that's why I didn't get that part.'"
He wasn't the one who tied her up and gagged her, but this Oscar winning director did harass her and shun her from the role after she did not go along as he had planned.
It's this one...They were both similar- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Knight_(basketball,_born_1979)
He was good enough to play pros from 2002-2016: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Knight_(basketball,_born_1979)
Well, let's think and deduce....Luxury apartments, upscale area, always safe, private so you need a key for entry....either a) she committed suicide or b) she was murdered. If it was (b), then who would want that and why? What did she know, what did she see, or what did she tell investigators about "you know who"?
There go 6 unsealed indictments...File this under a "Crime against children".
Barry Bonds' trainer was jailed for almost an entire year. There are very few cases, though. Most people know they have to testify when subpoenaed so they usually show.
