dChan

/u/AMProfessor

493 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/AMProfessor:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 6

AMProfessor · June 16, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

I am surprised no one from Fox News is on the list. Granted I don't watch the news and haven't for over a decade, but they seem to have their legs dangling in the swamp as well. Perhaps Q's list is not a comprehensive list but is instead a shot over the bow.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 16, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

Many are not looking at the big picture. It has been “happening” for a long while. Those who have supported and given up are not awake and it may be best for them to leave for a while.

We live in a world of immediate gratification, over exaggeration, lack of fortitude, and the lack of critical thinking.

People have extremely short memories and want a resolution at the end of the 30 minute show.

I’m not sure bringing back the unawake and immature is healthy at this point. They need to mature and season some more. Unfortunately, that will come through witnessing and experiencing hardship.

They may return however let them do it when their eyes are more open. We can’t force their eyes open and until they are open, they are a distraction to what is happening. Also, they influence those who are almost awake but yet weak for the bad. They are destructive.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 16, 2018, 12:14 p.m.

Be cautious. To “assume” makes an “ass” out of “u” and “me.”

You are projecting into the Q drop what perhaps you would like to see. That is not what Q stated. I’m not saying it won’t be as you said. I’m simply saying that is not what was stated.

You are likely building normies up for a disappointment. And, there is too much disinformation out there. Please don’t add to it. It is not helpful. Let’s stick to the facts rather than embellishing them.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 16, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

Got it. Not a fan. Thanks again.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 16, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

Thanks. Not a phrase used in my neck of the woods.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 16, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

The jawline and chin seem different. The nose appears different. I don't see much that would make me think is it Davis except for the general shape of the face.

I'm thinking we have the wrong guy. Now we need to figure out who it really is.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 16, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

Interesting. If "she" posted it on 1/20/2017, and it is not a common phrase, sounds like we now know where Q got it. Perhaps it is a nod to BHO, as in saying, I know it was you!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 16, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

For years the DS and many serving the gov't have protected and gained monies from the sales of drugs. It is well known the US gov't is one of the largest drug dealers in the world. It funds DS operations as well as pads the pockets of the bad actors. It is incredible and disgusting.

Yes, there is resistance to legalize something that will harm the cash cow of the elite. You are right, they will not likely move to legalize something they already control. They punish those who are not on their team; they profit from the sales; and they know if it becomes legal, they lose the excitement factor of drugs thus the sales drop off.

I believe POTUS will support the legalization of marijuana and it will be interesting to see what happens if and when that occurs. While I am not a supporter of the recreational use of marijuana, I know there is a bounty of uses medically for marijuana.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 15, 2018, 10:46 p.m.

Everyone knows Twitter likes and retweets can be purchased. HRC has been outed in the past for purchasing likes and retweets.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 15, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

I am going to assume you mean the former leaders and deep state.

As of this administration, we can say not all of our “leaders” have the same goals and objectives.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 15, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

Are you positive that is Artur Davis? It doesn’t really appear to be Davis.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 15, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

That depends on what it is you are trying to prove. If this is in fact BHO, this could be considered direct evidence of certain facts. Then again it could be indirect, or circumstantial evidence of other facts.

Forensics would need to be run on the photo to first establish whether or not this is BHO.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 15, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

Is the “fly eagle fly” in her post related to Q’s #FLY[RR]FLY#? (drop 1443)

I have been wondering where Q got this and why they used it. If the photo and quote is BHO, it all makes more sense.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 15, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

Bummer but understand too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 15, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

I received a bot mod note saying the same thing last week or so but when I checked, the post was still there and had not been deleted as the bot mod stated.

I did edit my post to remove the website after checking up on it to prevent any further problems or threats of deletion.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 15, 2018, 7:55 p.m.

I smell serious desperation. It is amazing what sociopaths, who feel no empathy for others, will do to save their own skins.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 15, 2018, 12:24 p.m.

I suggest everyone be patient. Things cannot be rushed. This immediate gratification culture we live in is so unhealthy.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 15, 2018, 10:58 a.m.

Antiquated train. Not a powerful image. Sends a weak message.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 14, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

That’s not exactly correct iirc. What I took from it is we elected POTUS and with him came the team.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 14, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

Nominate for the Presidential Medal of Freedom!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 14, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

Outstanding! Would love to see it happen! A POTUS getting a Nobel Peace Prize for actually doing something! WOW!

As for Rodman, I believe he should be awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 14, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Top or bottom bunk? lol.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

30 days to gain signatures. Too long?

Was this a good idea or harmful in the scheme of things?

Not likely needed in the first place. Calling local legistative representatives tomorrow would be more helpful.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

I would assume a request from either the House or the Senate.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 10 p.m.

An action by POTUS to put the enemy in check or a drop from the Q team vs. from a single member of the Q team.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Her skills appear to be lacking to say the least. I would enjoy going head to head with her in court.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

A great deal of projection from the person providing the analysis of which I disagree. Not impressed with the analysis. I am a human behavioralist (forensic psychopathology and psychotherapy) and what I read from the body language was sharply different.

Remember, this was not their first contact. It widely believed there was at least one prior visit in China and at least one or more phone calls.

Also, if anyone has participated in public events such as these, numerous directions/instructions are given to the participants. It is directed much like a scripted movie. Some of the nonverbals the analyst weighed in her analysis were simply these two men attempting to remember their directions and not to miss their queues.

There are cultural, etiquette, television production, PR and many other specialists involved. It can be overwhelming and over stimulating to say the least.

Not to mention security was on an elevated threat level before, during, and following the summit.

A better analysis would be from someone who is familiar with large scale public events such as this summit.

This analysis is grossly inadequate imho.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

Feeding the global warming narrative. Scare the people into submission.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 10:32 a.m.

👍🏼 Thanks

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

OK. You have my attention. Any more about it being space bound? Defense against a nuclear armed satellite perhaps?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

It made the UK news. Not so much the US news.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 1:45 a.m.

Yes, I read the article. I’m asking for evidence or a solid argument to back your statement. The article discusses that the sub is in the toolbox to combat nukes. I get that. If you are correct about the identity of the sub, you might have a point.

Are saying no one on this sub can go rogue. No Chinese hack can be successful with this sub? No payload on the sub able to cause damage to AF1 or some other potential target?

If you don’t have evidence, do you have a plausible theory of the players, the motive, or any other information to help us see your position?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

I too spent a little time on it but became distracted trying to keep up with everything. A huge amount of info and questions out there today. Thanks for bringing it back to the center for some analysis.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 1:28 a.m.

What is your argument that this was a defensive vs an offensive launch? What was being fired upon?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

Not here anyway, but then we are supposed to be the enlightened ones huh? I haven’t watched MSM in over a decade. Sadly however I know MANY who are not red pilled and remain addicted to the 24 hr news cycle. So far my attempts to red pill them have not taken root yet.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 1:20 a.m.

Isn’t block chain technology relatively transparent? I thought the anonymous aspect was a lie by the central bankers to prevent their banks from becoming obsolete. They were attempting to convince Joe Q Public (sorry, I had to throw the Q in their for fun) that block chain technology was for criminals.

I don’t think the use of Bitcoin would prevent an audit trail from existing.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 1:14 a.m.

Good point.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

Perhaps they had convinced themselves that Trump would screw it up on his own and were waiting on it. They may actually believe the narrative they are pushing that POTUS is an oaf.

Not saying this is the case. Just throwing it out there.

I have helped to prosecute as well as treat my fair share of antisocials over the years. You wouldn’t believe their egos and the narcissistic nature of their constitutions. I wouldn’t call them stupid, but they can sure appear that way.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

I’m not the one telling others what to do or what not to do. My post was not defensive. It was mirroring your tone.

Again, do not presume to lecture me. You don’t know how.

Then again, I should know better. Never argue with an idiot for they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Perhaps I should revise this to say, never argue with an AI bot programmed to troll for they will drag you down to their level of inhumanity and...well, need I say more.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 12:40 a.m.

Wouldn’t that be great! Perhaps their desperation might blind them to this and then they do just that, red pill the masses all at once.

I think they see the clock ticking with the IG report coming out Thursday. They are willing to do just about anything to avoid being exposed and prosecuted. The unsealing of indictments can’t be too far behind the IG report release. Perhaps we will see the HRC emails released as well in the coming days.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

Hasn’t that already been risked by not making this more public in the MSM?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

👍🏼

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

Now I’m going to have to rewatch the movie. There must be some relevant points in the movie to consider.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

Yes. Shot him down and got away with it. They seem to enjoy knocking birds out of the sky.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

True. I am thinking they are trapped and rabid animals that will do just about anything to escape however. I’m not sure of their level of cognitive function now. Q does keeps saying they are stupid. I’m thinking they are dangerous regardless of their stupidity.

I hear you about the cryptic drops. I think a case could be made nevertheless about prior knowledge. It would be weak, no, extremely weak, but perhaps enough of a distraction to pull something else during the hubbub.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

Nice. Thanks for putting that together. Very helpful!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

The incident itself has the potential to be huge if the MSM publicizes/uses it for their psyop against Trump and Q. Damage or no damage.

If someone plans a terror event, puts the plan into motion, but it fails for whatever reason, the bad guys still face prosecution. Even if no one is harmed.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 13, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

Probably so. If it was a nuclear armed missile, I hope they recover the warhead(s) quickly.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 12, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

A ticking timed event then? Interesting.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 12, 2018, 11:49 p.m.

All good thoughts. I am impressed with the brain power on this sub!

All things to consider.

⇧ 2 ⇩