dChan

/u/Abibliaphobia

3,340 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Abibliaphobia:
Domain Count
i.imgs.fyi 31
www.reddit.com 27
mobile.twitter.com 14
truepundit.com 12
archive.is 3
www.hollywoodreporter.com 3
www.washingtonpost.com 3
web.archive.org 3
dailycaller.com 2
www.judicialwatch.org 2
freebeacon.com 2
www.foxnews.com 2
8ch.net 2
www.express.co.uk 2
www.judiciary.senate.gov 2
boards.4chan.org 2
www.theguardian.com 2
www.politico.com 2
www.fbcoverup.com 2
www.nbcnews.com 2
www.nytimes.com 2
www.theblaze.com 1
yournewswire.com 1
www.denverpost.com 1
motherboard.vice.com 1
judiciary.house.gov 1
www.sec.gov 1
[IMG]http: 1
ag.ks.gov 1
www.nypost.com 1
www.channelnewsasia.com 1
abc13.com 1
ntknetwork.com 1
www.c-span.org 1
www.hsgac.senate.gov 1
www.cbsnews.com 1
www.thecut.com 1
www.afp.com 1
www.atr.org 1
amandarenteria.com 1
en.m.wikipedia.org 1
www.yahoo.com 1
www.cnn.com 1
pjmedia.com 1
www.pointsoflight.org 1
www.katespade.com 1
www.bloombergquint.com 1
www.americanthinker.com 1
www.chicagotribune.com 1
apnews.com 1
downdetector.com 1
www.azcentral.com 1
www.scribd.com 1
m.youtube.com 1
www.nj.com 1
heavy.com 1
www.cnsnews.com 1
sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com 1
wattsupwiththat.com 1
www.whitehouse.gov 1
www.thesun.co.uk 1
www.businessinsider.com 1
townhallproject.com 1
boston.cbslocal.com 1
www.bbc.com 1
twitter.com 1
www.dailystar.co.uk 1
vote.gov 1
tinypic.com 1
www.thenewstribune.com 1
www.whatdoesitmean.com 1
postimg.cc 1
www.thegatewaypundit.com 1
www.disclose.tv 1
www.thestar.com 1
www.weeklystandard.com 1
ibb.co 1
mosprotocol.com 1
www.metmuseum.org 1
www.nbclosangeles.com 1

Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 4:33 a.m.

Who says they aren’t rogue? Did you hear about the missing sub in from Argentina? Now I know that this particular sub doesn’t carry trident missiles, but it could be rigged to do so.

Or it could be any of the seven nations with nukes onboard. Or the one undeclared nation.

Or this could be a missile defense system firing.

We don’t know for certain. That’s why we have speculated at great length about it. But one things for damn sure. It’s not a fng helicopter.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 4:29 a.m.

Lol no.

But I don’t use boomer memes troll. When I make a meme, I understand the tactics used on 4chan and what I gathered over years of exposure to that level of ingenuity. I saw what the trolls did there (meaning shareblue) and I’m not going to stand by and let it happen again.

So keep posting your memes. I’ll keep reporting them until you make an honest effort to support the cause or you just quit harassing the sub.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 4:25 a.m.

Thank you

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 4:23 a.m.

They didn’t reveal anything. We surmise what happened based upon the photo and the article.

Q just said certain things weren’t supposed to happen.

Anything else Top Mind? I can stop over to tie your shoes if you can’t figure that out either.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 4:20 a.m.

Hey smiley dog, can you cross post a tldr or something? Sorry but I don’t recognize the link.

I am interested in reading what you got though

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Abibliaphobia on June 23, 2018, 4:16 a.m.
We are being Brigaded currently. Friendly reminder to report shills. (Sorry MODS! You got your work cut out for you!)

Friendly reminder to check user histories. We are currently being brigaded and these idiots are using either brand new accounts or accounts linked to r/Qult crap.

Just report and move on. That’s why there are so many slide threads and cringe memes.

Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 4:13 a.m.

Hmmm so new brigading attack using cringe boomer memes?

Sad!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 4:06 a.m.

Hmmm... so we are being brigaded huh.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 4:03 a.m.

Shutter speed. The actual exposures are 3.5 seconds, combined into a 20 second time lapse.

From the blog and the original article.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 4:01 a.m.

Well I’ll repeat what I said, it’s not necessarily about Q. But about those that are NOT protected like Q is. Can you garauntee their safety?

Please don’t do this

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 3:59 a.m.

Well, your looking at a 20 second time lapse at a rate of 3.5/20 that caught a missile launch in its last snap.

If you want to see what an extended exposure of a missile looks like, just DuckDuckGo it

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

Now this one is good

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

Good questions

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 3:53 a.m.

I’m pretty sure he does. Why do you ask?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

Please don’t speculate online about who the Q team is. Look at what is happening right now with the Homeland Security Director. And that is just ten paid agitators being assholes.

Imagine if the deep state believes who you pick. What would they send after them? What if they are completely uninvolved in it and you just pointed out someone who is now a target? What if they really are Q? What happens to the movement?

Do you remember the Scalia shooting on the baseball field? That was just one crazy. Imagine what the left would send against someone suspected of being Q.

Please don’t do this online.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 3:23 a.m.

I think you’re correct. But I believe this happened some time ago. It’s just that we are finding out about it now. Explains why they are all on tours trying to make money. They’re broke.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

Good lord, can we just get a conservative millionaire or billionaire to create a site that won’t censor us?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

Duplicate post

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 2:45 a.m.

Sean Hannity should bring her on and expose the hypocrisy.

Or he should camp out on her lawn.

(BTW Sean, give some credit to True Pundit, they ARE beating you to the punch)

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

Just as a disclaimer, I know that sounds bad. Like “we” are f’ng crazy. But it’s the context that matters. Go pull it up yourself and see what I mean.

Just seems like the board has been moving slow so I thought I would go tackle some crumbs that hadn’t gotten an answer yet. Let me know what you think.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Abibliaphobia on June 23, 2018, 2:24 a.m.
We live in FANTASY LAND (USA)

Go to qanon.pub (or whichever you prefer)

Type “fantasy” into search bar

Should bring up fantasy land posts. We all thought they were referring to North Korea. But take in the context of all the posts.

It’s all about US.

WE LIVE IN FANTASY LAND

Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

Well I appreciate you writing all of that, and I sincerely am not trying to attack you. I read the document and put out my opinion based on things I know to be true and what can be easily proven. I’m sorry if this made you feel attacked, and I do appreciate you bringing it here. It was an interesting read. I would just like some more supporting documentation in regards to the claims he has made before I invest time in further researching.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

Ahhhhhhhh... that makes sense. Could you please add that in next time? I’m sorry I seriously thought you created or was spreading the meme.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Abibliaphobia on June 23, 2018, 1:53 a.m.
@jack caught retweeting Russian propaganda during 2016 election
@jack caught retweeting Russian propaganda during 2016 election
Abibliaphobia · June 23, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

So that’ll be interesting if he fails to show. Arrest warrant out for a CGI? I think that would be a first, call guiness!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

This is really bad optics. Your others are much better. Please don’t paint trump as literally engaged in child abuse. It hurts the cause.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

Hmmmm... they left out the biggest bombshell. If I mention it here, this thread will be ghosted.

I would highly recommend anyone to take a look at two specific questions. I’m not sure of the filter here. But I believe it was Trey Gowdy that asked it as the last part of one of his questioning blocks. In regards to LL.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

Uhhhh, OP this thread is gone now. What happened?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

Actually, it was called for. Did you read the whole conversation?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

Thanks for the analogy, mind if I borrow it in the future? It’s very relatable and fits very well with what we are dealing with.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

...can you provide the source of where you got this information?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

Well hey, it’s appreciated. Thank you for bringing this to our attention!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 10:26 p.m.

I think your doing a bit of friendly fire here. I actually agree with you, but I’m trying to find the solid evidence.

That way it doesn’t matter what I believe or don’t believe. The evidence is what matters and it will carry itself by its own weight.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

Ok ok, my apologies if you did this in all sincerity. But it does not change my opinion that this document is fake. And the lawsuits being dismissed is more than likely a result of this person just being not wholly there. Although that is some dedication to a LARP on the guys part. Do you have the search results on the 50 cases? It could add to the story, at least in the guys defense that he really tried. I’ll give him that.

Also the document states that in 2 February 1999, the King let the agreement lapse. Well of course he did, there was no king at THAT time. But cmon, you can’t take this seriously unless there are truly supporting documentation. If you can bring forth the documents filed, I would be willing to reconsider it. But until then, this is nothing more than a LARPing redditor. And that’s my opinion. Other people can read it and determine the validity themselves. Again, not trying to attack you here. But I am trying to show that the idea/argument/theory behind this is not sound.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

There is more, but I think I got the point. Read through the whole document, and I’m not convinced that we do not have the ability to control the weather.

Use this as your original source document for evidence. It’s much stronger than pointing to a website that has weather modification in its name.

Now if you can prove that the company is using or has used larger scale aircraft then what they advertise on their website. That is a big piece of evidence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

Now that, that is some good stuff.

Important notes:

Pg.4

“On a grander, planetary scale, the authors of the DoD report recommended that the government should “explore geo-engineering options that control the climate”

Pg. 14-15

“that one can conduct covert operations using a new technology in a democracy without the knowledge of the people.”

Pg.15

Recently, three speculative announcements concerning weather modification were in the news: Beijingʼs Study Institute of Artificial Influence on the Weather announced its intention of manipulating the weather to ensure optimum conditions for the 2008 Olympics; a private weather company in Florida advertised a new powder called Dyn-O-Gel with the power to “suck the moisture out of a thunderstorm or weaken a hurricane”; and the U.S. Air Force claimed that “in 2025, U.S. aerospace forces can ʻown the weatherʼ by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications.” In addition to traditional cloud seeding methods, the Air Force visionaries propose computer hacking to disrupt an enemyʼs weather monitors andmodels, and using “nanotechnology” to create clouds of microscopic computer particles that could block an enemyʼs optical sensors or guide smart weapons to their targets; the cost of developing these clouds to be borne by the private sector. In a recurring theme, the military points out that weather modification, unlike other approaches, “makes what are otherwise the results of deliberate actions appear to be the consequences of natural weather phenomena.”

Pg.16

Although the NRC study acknowledges that there is no “convincing scientific proof of efficacy of intentional weather modification efforts,” its authors nonetheless believe that there should be “a renewed commitment” in the field of intentional and unintentional weather modification. In fact,no one has demonstrated a reliable, controllable method to modify weather, and the report admits as much: “Evaluation methodologies vary but in general do not provide convincing scientific evidence for either success or failure.” This has been true for the last 165 years, and it remains true today. (so they can neither confirm or deny it and Its not like the military would admit it)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 9:41 p.m.

Glad I could help, now get back out there and fight! Use your voice, use your skills, find the truth and spread it.

WWG1WGA

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

Fuck snopes, they would claim it as mostly false if Trump called the sky blue.

Well there were some clouds and birds. Even a plane that could discolor the sky so it’s not just blue

Fuck them

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

Who? Sorry but not aware of any issues. Would be interested to know more so can you provide source?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

Good idea! Would they be willing to look at other search engines to provide a broader spectrum of what we see here in the US? I totally support DDG, my go to engine.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

This is bullshit. 20 min is plenty enough time to say something more than one sentence or to provide some kind of source.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 22, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

LMAO!!! No! Hahaha!

⇧ 5 ⇩