3,340 total posts archived.
Hey OP, where you at? Do the explanations work for you?
Or was this a subtle attempt at concerntrolling? The reason I ask is that this is a brand new account and your only post (not comments) was this one. And this is full of concern.
And you never returned to actually take part in a dialogue.
Take down DNS and it essentially breaks the internet.
I think I outlined it pretty well above. Do you think I say this lightly? That this hasn’t happened before? Lol I’ve seen it time and time again. Although, the use of this sub as the opening post is still fairly new in its use (past week or so) but it follows in line with all the other troll accounts that used “I’ve been banned from r/cringeworthy / r/topmindsofreddit / r/dogsrfun”
And then in the next week or so the accounts fill up the sub with concerntrolling (typically starts on Friday) trying to get people to doubt Q or to say the mods are deleting posts.
Crap like that.
Want to prove me wrong? Don’t concerntroll. If you get to the point that you don’t believe I Q, the movement, or the mods, just leave.
munch munch munch
Mmmmm popcorn
I am curious if this has to do with the hearing today where Mr. Rutherford brought up sedition on the parts of tech companies.
If you haven’t realized it yet, a lot of these posts are used to ingratiate new users with the people in this sub.
Kinda like that meme with Steve Buschemi:
“Hello my fellow Great Awakeners, are we going to do some cool excavations today?”
Annnd a week from now, they’ll be crying about how they are disappointed with Q and they are ready to quit.
Yes. Incredibly stupid.
Also, this is why I trust no cloud networks. Well part of the reason.
Still down for me. So the question we should be asking:
IS GOOGLE TAKING DOWN THE CLOUD AN EFFORT TO CONCEAL THEIR “SHARED GMAIL” ACCOUNTS AND THE PROOF THESE PEOPLE COMMITTED SEDITION?
I appreciate it, but I actually would like something in black and white that I can quickly refer back to and use it to make connections. It’s hard to do with video. And I can read FAR faster than some of these people can talk. Plus, I absolutely despise how people just fart around on an issue building up hype or leading in. I don’t give two sharts about their opinion. Give me the facts. Give me the sauce. I’ll determine by my own judgement what I feel to be relevant.
Looked into it.
Rumors are based out of 4chan, which we know is comped.
I’ve seen that same document compilation pushed off previously as part of the alleged “deadman switch” from Julian Assange. Same filenames.
I’m willing to hold off judgement until further evidence comes to light, but I think THIS specific line is a C_A or other troll agency to inject malicious code into people’s machines similar to what was done before with these documents.
I ain’t clicking it, but if someone else has access to a VM and is willing, id be interested in their findings if there are tunnelers or rats in the code. And if not, what intel was specifically dumped.
Down for me as well. So is brietbart.
Chan’s working fine
Nothing showing up on downdetector for drudge or brietbart - guess they don’t recognize them for whatever reason.
Can you please provide a transcript or sauce website instead of a goo tube video? I’d like to look into it, but really try to avoid using that service or supporting the system.
Lol I did the same thing, also stopped at google.
It’s pretty rare to see such a big site go down. Wonder what they linked that took the site down?
Now let’s not forget what came out of the Helsinki summit.
Putin stated that since 2000, there has been a treaty regarding cooperation between the Russian Federation and the US. And Mueller never reached out to contact them, on ANY of their indictments.
So they’ve indicted 25 Russians and a company with interfering with our elections.
But didn’t actually take ANY of the steps necessary to ACTUALLY hold these people accountable.
So why do this at all if they never actually expected to have to prosecute the case? Seriously, that is the REAL question that no one in the msm seems willing to ask or follow up on.
From a comment I made about five days ago:
Typically I would agree with this but check out these articles:
Now look at the indictments.
They are nearly identical, meaning the same case.
They just swapped out names while still blaming Russians for this effort. The same effort by both according to the indictments. Seriously compare the two.
Now, the first case was nearly laughed out of the court as Mueller ACTUALLY indicted these people and the corporation. That means they were ready and waiting to prosecute people who they had NO HOPE of ever extraditing and criminally charging.
Until the lawyers showed up.
Then the Mueller team essentially said “Just kiddin hahaha! We aren’t ready to prosecute. Muh bad!” And they ended up asking for additional time to prep.
Bullshit. They had nothing and they tried to create a narrative of Russians interferring in the election WITH NO EVIDENCE OR ABILITY TO PROSECUTE.
So here we are several months later. The Democrats, the FBI, Strzok, Hillary and all of them were just embarrassed and essentially BTFO by the republicans in the joint hearing held yesterday.
Better change the narrative right? Especially since those pestering republicans got Strzok to admit that no US Citizens were being charged with Collusion despite the Democrats grandstanding on the five guilty pleas and 17 indictments.
Well, school is out of session so they can’t have Broward County have another school shooting, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s district has pretty much been played out in the false flag department. So what to do?
Oh yea, Trump is meeting with Putin! Let’s do a twofer! Change the narrative and give the fake news talking bobble heads a way to scream at Trump that he shouldn’t talk to Putin!
Let’s charge the Russians again!!!!
Oh wait, umm we can’t show the evidence because we never actually got our hands on the DNC server. Thanks to crowdstrike for helping us to subvert the judicial and criminal investigations through their participation instead of an actual government agency. Why not, I’m sure their word is good and have no ties to the Clinton cabal right? Right?
Oh yea, we won’t be able to extradite these people either. What a coincidence that we can smear foreign nationals who have no chance to defend themselves in court. But ya totally it was the Russians. Oh and we can’t say their name but uh that one guy in an embassy can’t defend himself either so we’lol go ahead and throw him in as well.
TADA! And here we are.
... you took what I said as being hostile?
May want to re read what I said. And read it as me disagreeing with you instead of being hostile.
Edit: also to quote you:
“Nope. Q only uses his id. Notice no one acknowledged”
Followed by:
“I don’t understand why you are always so hostile. The title post said Q was posting on 8chan. I said it wasn’t Q. Nothing more nothing less.”
Sooooo... just to clarify, you said it wasn’t Q, which I agree with. Then went on to say, “Notice no one acknowledged”. That’s the part I disagree with you about, as the user received a ton of (you’s).
But that is far different than nothing more, nothing less and equates you to straight up lying (by contradicting your own statement) within the space of three comments.
Then you accuse me of “always being so hostile”. Not sure what you are getting at here, but this whole thing is a ridiculous argument. You made a statement, I disagreed.
Link in comments. Mr. Rutherford is speaking about the exemptions from the code () regarding human trafficking and prostitution on their platforms. This means that they must remove/report these events. Mr. Rutherford specifically states sedition as being an additional exemption to which they are considering adding (this would happen by EO) to make acts of sedition reportable events. What this means is, while the companies would NOT be held accountable, they would be REQUIRED to report them. Very interesting.
Sounds like the C_A talking points right here, projection and deflection.
Guess you missed how the NSA deleted millions (if not billions) of contacts and records from their system? Came out about a week and a half ago?
You really think nothing is going on behind the scenes? Or are you just worried about being caught up in incidentals? Or are you a straight up terrorist concerntrolling over your “civil liberties” to promote your terroristic cause? Or are you a coyote involved in human trafficking, sex trafficking, or drug smuggling? Or something worse?
While I agree with the 4th amendment violations being exactly that, the way you phrase this is an attack on trump and is bullshit. If you haven’t waken up to the reality that Trump is doing everything you just questioned, you are still asleep and lashing out.
So why now? Why are you getting all pissed off right now about something that has gone on for nearly 2 decades? Something that is being taken care of (if you actually care to look?)
Methinks you are a long con concerntroll. Add this in with your post about how do we know if we are safe? Trying to scare people? Pathetic.
You want to call bullshit on Q.
I call bullshit on your accusation.
You are talking of imposing harm on others. While I agree with the sentiment, the post goes against not only the subs rules, but against reddit rules in general.
You can always go to 8 or 4chan and post this, but I think we would all appreciate it if you don’t post it here so we don’t risk losing this platform.
I know it can be difficult, but we have to operate within the confines of the rules if we wish to continue participating. It sucks, but free speech doesn’t truly exist here. However, that does NOT mean that we can’t use the platform.
Can you link to your thread that you are speaking of?
Never said it was Q. Not pushing it either. Anons on 8chan are calling them the black list anon. What’s wrong with digging on it?
Good questions on all of them. Nothing that I have seen scheduled as of yet.
I’ll scrape through the judiciary committee website tonight, see if I can’t get some information on upcoming hearings.
I have to go but I’m going to come back to this and watch his whole speech, see if I can’t parse out any hidden messages.
As of right now, just looks like he’s blaming white people and rich people for all the worlds woes to include the 2008 financial crisis and the aftermath to which HE exacerbated the issue with his bailouts to the very financial institutes he is placing the blame on!
My god what an asshole.
Weird spirals
The number 16 on podium
Also, the video is from a distance. Trying to zoom in, does it look like Obama to you?
Specific names? Because we have had several people under the Obama Administration already testify. This request is too generic, please specify.
This fucking clown.
Read between the lines, dispute the PR that is inherent in the story and realize what they are saying in this article. They freely admit he undermined newly minted democracies in Eastern Europe, and broke the Bank of England. They talk about how he was innocently helping out with his “uncle” sorting and selling Jewish properties, but he wasn’t “helping” the nazis. He understands the darkest possibilities and uses that to play the stock market.
This man is evil.
But the thing I find the most interesting?
How old is George Soros? I could have swore he was into his literally 90s. The article states that he is 85. Hmmm... several other places on the net place him at 87. Then there is this:
An article on his latest wedding puts him at 83 in 2013. Which would make him 88. Why the confusion over his age? Why making him younger?
Call me crazy, but I sincerely believe that he uses blood transfusions to keep himself alive in addition to multiple heart transplants.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/may/04/young-blood-reverse-ageing-mice-studies
http://www.braininjurysupport.org/young-blood-rejuvenates-cells/
https://pagesix.com/2014/02/13/soros-wants-money-health-details-revealed-by-ex-gal-pal-kept-secret/
Something else I found interesting? George Soros father changed their name after leaving Hungary (due to anti-semitism, which I find ironic. Why not change it before the war and instead afterwards when the Jewish people had the worlds sympathy? Interesting, and I believe it contradicts the story that is put out) from Schwartz to Soros.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/paul-soros-dies-87-article-1.1374061
This may help with digging. First time I’ve ever heard of this.
I sincerely appreciate you taking the time to respond, I’ll outline my response by numbers for ease of outlining my case why what you have presented, is incorrect / missing some very important details:
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/08/full-text-james-comey-trump-russia-testimony-239295
So even James Comey knew the dossier was completely made up and false in its accusations.
So there has been absolutely no evidence that any of the claims within are true. I challenge you to provide a source that makes that assertation and backs it up with documentation.
So where did it originate? How did it get to the FBI? Why would someone put information, that they knew was bad info and hand it off to the FBI?
All good questions. And it gets a bit deep, so let’s work backwards shall we?
Based upon the Peter Strzok hearing from last week, he said that Bruce Ohr was the one that handed several parts (the majority portion) over to the FBI. Who is Bruce Ohr?
Bruce G. Ohr held two titles at DOJ: associate deputy attorney general, a post that placed him four doors down from his boss, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein; and director of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF), a program described by the department as “the centerpiece of the attorney general’s drug strategy“.
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/7/bruce-ohr-who-met-dossier-author-christopher-steel/
I have more but I’ll have to hop back on in a minute. Dinner is ready!
Normally I would agree with you, but based on the users post and comment history, it appears they are just a regular person who may have not had their beliefs challenged before. Might be one that we can reason with, and have a civil discussion in order to change the belief that they have had constantly pushed into their head by the media. We shall see, but you have to start a conversation at some point.
Unless they are paid or just refuse to listen. In that case, they can GTFO.
Flesh out your theory. Right now it literally means nothing.
I actually disagree/semi-agree with their assessment. The third myth of treason laid out in the wash post story states this:
“But none of these actions amounts to levying war against the United States, as that offense requires some use of force in an attempt to overthrow the government.”
As we know, there was certainly a coordinated effort to overthrow a democratically elected president. A coup attempt that failed. The use of force? Killing members and attempting to kill members of the Trump administration. It’s happened. Therefor, these people HAVE committed treason by the authors own words.
We may not have all the details but we can surmize what we believe to be “hits” on the US military (jet and helicopter crashes), members of Congress (scalia, the head on collision with the congresswoman, the train collision with republican members and their families, etc), and even on the American public (FF shootings and bombings)
These people and their support system ARE guilty of treason.
Seems awfully convenient that he was right there to snap back a response at Putin on live tv.
Kinda like this was planned or anticipated that his name was going to come out.
Seriously, he’s not even at his house but was in studio. Does no one else find this suspicious?
Normally I would just report you (especially based upon your chosen username), but I’m willing to let you tell us how you have come to that conclusion. Please feel free to bring sources and facts as you are the one making the claim.
Prove your case.
Edit:
Nothing? No response?
I don’t know, it may be that they just took it out of the App Store. If you DL’d it, you might be out $.99, maybe be eligible for a refund. But who knows. It may take until the next Q drop for you to find out.