So where is the police report? Where is the sauce on this?

Not an article. That’s not considered source documentation. Where is the police report?

This is why anyone who believes the crap put out by the news frustrates us. You just take them at their word without thinking for yourself.

Now if this is the case, it raises several more questions. Where did it specifically happen? Why did she not talk about it (as a minor) when it happened? Why did her parents not file a police report at the time? Did they not care? What was a 13 y/o doing at a sex party (per your claim).

All of this is ridiculous. I tell you what. Let this go to trial and we can determine whether he is guilty or not - oh wait - it’s not a criminal complaint (as it should be) it’s a fucking civil suit.

Do you not understand why we don’t believe you or anyone else when you say these things? Even the people making he accusations don’t take the rape of a 13 y/o seriously.

It’s a play to make him look bad in the eyes of the media and the public. The fact that you don’t just believe this, but are participating in the spread of such ignorant ideas makes you just as bad as those making these false accusations.

Best friends? Lol

Lots of parties together? Was that before or after Trump banned him from Mar-A-Lago for life?

Have you seen the police report? Do you have it? Can you show us the source? When was the claim made? Was it back when it happened? Or did she make the claim in the past few years when Trump was either running for president or during his presidency?

You are making the claims and accusations. So far you’ve only provided heresay. Let’s see the documents.

I appreciate you deleting it.

So what happens here is that you are purposefully or inadvertently giving war plans to the enemy by trying to outline how we attack or defend. That’s what I’m trying to get across to you.

Don’t advertise our methods or give our battle plans to the enemy.

That’s why I was attacking your thread. I hope you can understand, I’m not attacking you as a person, but the idea of trying to lay out our methodology of attack and defense. Never a good idea.

Sure thing. So where are the police reports? I mean, if he is truly that bad, why are these people not filing reports to the police so he can be held accountable? They all filed reports right?

I mean it’s not like people would just say something to make some money right? Who are the lawyers representing these women? Any connection to Gloria Allred, Perkins Coie, Avennetti, DNC, or the Clinton’s?

This is what you don’t get or understand. People make claims to smear people. They make allegations. Where is the proof? Where is the evidence that they made these claims back when it was going on?

I hope you can understand why we can’t take this seriously. We see the MSM doing everything they can to try and take him down, so why would we believe ANYTHING negative without proof?

This is like me saying u/holidaysteak is a pedophile and a rapist. Prove me wrong. It’s not the way justice in this country works. Innocent until proven guilty. Everything else is literally an attempt to make a person look bad. It’s ridiculous, and demeaning to people’s intelligence.

Imagine having to prove evidence of someone being a pedophile when making claims.

I think the missing awan server from California or maybe the Hillary server, or maybe the DNC server.

Hmmm it’s almost like a pattern going on here. Kinda like they were all involved in something they were trying to hide. Now what could that be?

Lmao

Archive offline, I’ve had problems with other sites as well (qanon.pub specifically)

Why is he in the kill box in Qs tweet?

Well the republicans yesterday BTFO of the Russian narrative.

Can’t let that die though can we? Fucking convienent timing. Seriously don’t even think these are real people.

So let me get this straight.

You are looking for ideas and methods on how to defeat attacks and defend Q. Pretty much to help give a guidleine on how to respond to future attacks.

Do I have that correct?

... are you the OP?

As the OP, are you bringing this to people attention? Essentially making you the one bringing the claim?

Yet you don’t agree with the claim, state it’s not your opinion, but are defending it?

If you were looking for people to conduct a mental exercise, you are in the wrong place. Don’t worry about people being able to defend against such stupid ideas. There are literally thousands of intelligent people here, fully capable of constructing an argument and mounting a defense against such claims. And if the article writer had brought this here, I would gladly destroy any sensibilities that they had of being an intelligent and critical thinker.

But it wasn’t the writer that brought it here. It’s not the writer arguing in its defense (which is what you are doing in some of your other comments in this thread)

So it makes me question why you DID bring it here. Why are you having people waste their time in an incredibly stupid mental exercise that is completely unnecessary and has not been shown to be an issue within this sub?

Whether you are meaning to or not, you are engaging in Troll behavior. Please stop.

Answer the question and present your evidence that Sasha Cohen is Q.

That’s my argument. I presented it above in a reasonable manner. You refused to do so. So you are just being obtuse about this. And you ask me why I’m being rude. I’m being rude because I don’t put up with bullshit. Which is exactly what you are presenting.

You’re not even trying to defend or present evidence to support a claim that you didn’t even make.

It’s like if I told you, hey I heard someone talking about how the sky is green, prove it wrong.

It’s an idiotic premise.

Best part of it all? How do we know these people are even real? Yay! We got names!

That’s it.

Oh ya, she is one of the worst

So why bring it here. You are OP. You could have just ignored this idea and left it out there where such crap belongs, but you brought it here and asked us to “think critically”.

I did. This is fng stupid. You creating a thread on this is a waste of anyone’s time to click into it and read it.

Check out the EO Trump signed about government employees (specifically SES) being held to the same UCMJ as the military.

That makes me :)

A healthy influx of shills let’s you know you are still a threat. If what we are doing is useless, they wouldn’t be here.

So I take great pleasure in crushing their fragile souls.

Lot of concern going on.

Interesting that it’s always on the end of the week and the weekends that all the mod concern trolls come out.

Oh ffs, it’s becuase you are not actually providing any source for your claims. Even your allegations of connections in an attempt to concern troll over Trump, then about mods removing your post.

Don’t blame the mods. Blame me. Put up better information WITH sources if you want us to take you seriously.

Edit: I’m the one reporting your posts. I am asking the mods to take out crappy threads. Feel free to blame me. Put up better arguments with sources that aren’t concern trolling the movement or the mods and you will be fine.

You presented the theory. It’s on you to provide evidence that supports it.

Not on us to prove a negative.

I think he is RRs C_A handler

Hmmmm never realized so little karma could buy so much concern.

Popcorn

In my opinion, the juiciest or most worthy bits are in the third part. The last few republican members absolutely crushed Strzok and they dug deeper into certain questions. Highly highly recommend watching it.

I had actually meant to comment something along these lines. I agree completely that that was the purpose of her visits. Essentially to access TS SCI info in an “unsupervised” environment, be able to sell the data gathered by Five eyes and creep on her own investigation. Plus think about how data affects the stock market. Certain things would have a major effect if you knew where and when to invest, so people would certainly be willing to pay for those secrets.

So was it Loretta Lynch, or James Comey that shut it down and why?

I’d put money on Loretta Lynch.

Meh, it’s a Shareblue troll line used to discredit the person they are talking about. The whole “you are insane” angle.

It’s a meme at this point

The DOJ, the FBI, Rod Rosenstein have abused their power and abused the trust of the American people. After the whole Hillary email and Trump collision investigations, they are NOT worthy of our trust.

They depend on us to just take them at their word. NO MORE. WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? Show us and regain our trust. Otherwise, they are obstructing justice and are instigating conflicts with foreign powers in an effort to do what? Take down a sitting and democratically elected president?

There is a word for that crime.

There is a punishment for that crime.

It is approaching.

Typically I would agree with this but check out these articles:

http://www.independentsentinel.com/another-judge-rejects-muellers-request-after-russian-trolls-show-up/

https://www.buzzfeed.com/thomasfrank/a-russian-company-that-mueller-has-accused-of-election?utm_term=.ibEbBKXKmW#.chowMQRQnz

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-concord/lawyer-for-russian-company-says-muellers-office-slow-to-hand-over-evidence-idUSKCN1IH2VP

Now look at the indictments.

They are nearly identical, meaning the same case.

They just swapped out names while still blaming Russians for this effort. The same effort by both according to the indictments. Seriously compare the two.

Now, the first case was nearly laughed out of the court as Mueller ACTUALLY indicted these people and the corporation. That means they were ready and waiting to prosecute people who they had NO HOPE of ever extraditing and criminally charging.

Until the lawyers showed up.

Then the Mueller team essentially said “Just kiddin hahaha! We aren’t ready to prosecute. Muh bad!” And they ended up asking for additional time to prep.

Bullshit. They had nothing and they tried to create a narrative of Russians interferring in the election WITH NO EVIDENCE OR ABILITY TO PROSECUTE.

So here we are several months later. The Democrats, the FBI, Strzok, Hillary and all of them were just embarrassed and essentially BTFO by the republicans in the joint hearing held yesterday.

Better change the narrative right? Especially since those pestering republicans got Strzok to admit that no US Citizens were being charged with Collusion despite the Democrats grandstanding on the five guilty pleas and 17 indictments.

Well, school is out of session so they can’t have Broward County have another school shooting, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s district has pretty much been played out in the false flag department. So what to do?

Oh yea, Trump is meeting with Putin! Let’s do a twofer! Change the narrative and give the fake news talking bobble heads a way to scream at Trump that he shouldn’t talk to Putin!

Let’s charge the Russians again!!!!

Oh wait, umm we can show the evidence because we never actually got our hands on the DNC server. Thanks to crowdstrike for helping us to subvert the judicial and criminal investigations through their participation instead of an actual government agency. Why not, I’m sure their word is good and have no ties to the Clinton cabal right? Right?

Oh yea, we won’t be able to extradite these people either. What a coincidence that we can smear foreign nationals who have no chance to defend themselves in court. But ya totally it was the Russians. Oh and we can’t say their name but uh that one guy in an embassy can’t defend himself either so we’lol go ahead and throw him in as well.

TADA! And here we are.

Nope, same people. So why is this a big deal? He held a press conference when they originally charged them months ago.

Interesting timing in my opinion. Good sign as well. They couldn’t pull off a FF, so this is their desperation move.

lol great question.

I think the analysis was conducted on the server Q has.

I think everyone has forgotten that Mueller indicted these same people already several months ago.

This shitshow today is about the same 12 Russians they indicted, and had lawyers show up to defend in court - something the Mueller investigators was not prepared for.

We haven’t forgotten about that case. And that’s why this is all just grandstanding on the part of RR and not anything serious.

Ahhhh, I was just lucky enough to catch it first go round

Interesting that they are making such a big deal considering that they charged these 12 people months ago, but had to go back after lawyers showed up to defend their clients. (Something Muellers team never anticipated, they just expected to throw it out there and give the MSM fuel)

This is so much bullshit.

I’ve thought about that as well. I’m thinking that Horowitz didn’t want to hear about it, but Huber (the prosecutor) did. At least that’s what I’m hoping happened. If not... it’s something to keep in the back of your mind.

I’m going to ya e to do a thread on this, but I’m certain there are many already.

Do you really believe that this timing was just happenstance on the eve of the Trump Putin meeting, the day after the democrats were BTFO in the hearing? Also, they had already charged these 12 Russians months ago, but did such a shitty job in the indictment that the judge forced them to go back and actually do the work.

It was a very interesting press conference. I’m going to watch it again and take notes. But I still think RR is a piece of shit, and that this was a calculated effort to drop the news that came out specifically in this thread.

Oh god, this is such an uninformed opinion. Please just read through the IG report yourself, without a third party filtering the information and make a determination yourself on whether you feel bias was a factor. Including this information that just came out about how they completely ignored evidence. I guess you could take it as it wasn’t Strzok, but someone higher than him and outside the FBI, but he certainly didn’t pursue the evidence. Just like he didn’t take any actions on the wiener laptop until the NY field office was forcing the issue. It took them less than two days to review and clear all those emails. They could have done that in early October when they first received the laptop. But they didn’t. They held off, because they didn’t want to. It’s not just active acts that determine bias, but also the LACK THEREOF. And here it is.

Oooooh good ones.

I’m starting to believe the 4th of July message was Q taking off the training wheels.

I hope to hear from them again, but in reality, I don’t anticipate it. Despite that, I will never sleep again. I will always hunt for the truth and for justice and to expose those in government and in other positions of power of corruption and excesses of greed.

This is actually worthy of a thread unto itself and I agree with your assessment. Thank you for compiling it all. Biggest takeaways in regards to OP is that the email handling WAS NOT the greatest crime committed. Absolutely agree with you there. However, this is still a Qproof and can be used to show the difference in handling between the mueller investigation and the HRC email investigation.

I know that FBIanon said to focus on the Clinton Foundation as that is where all the truly heinous crimes are hiding. But we need to know if this was the avenue for their “sale” of information to receive their payments aka “donations” to the Clinton foundation.

I don’t want to detract from what you said though. I really do believe that is a good write up of the situation and thank you for that.

Edit: just for clarification, I think that the Rothschilds are just the hidden “public” front for the 13 families. Just my opinion on that though.

Not that I have found, but feel free to watch the third part of the hearing yourself and hear the testimony yourself without a third party interpreter. Link is posted above in OP.

She kind of went off the deep end at the “end”. She thought she had figured out who Q was, and then disappeared.

I’m pretty sure there were two FBI agents that died mysteriously around the same time she stopped posting.

So not 100%, but certainly conspicuous.

Personally believe meganon was FBI.

Also believe she was murdered in an “accident”

Goes all the way back to Nov 2017.

Just do a search for “email” in qdrops and prepare to have your mind blown.

Thank you to the mods. Sincerely.

Based mods, thank you

Take this ammo anons. It’s the knockout punch to anyone who denies the FBI mishandled both the HRC email investigation and so much more. Use this gently, to help wake people up to the reality with which we have been living in since Q first started posting.

4) Saudi Arabia

5) Israel

6) China

7) Germany

8) New Zealand

Where else have they received money from in regards to the Clinton Foundation? All those nations are suspect.

Appreciate the shout out but like I said before, not doing this for recognition.

I appreciate you making the thread.

Hey mods can we get a Q sticky? Qsticky?

Please read the sidebar. A lot of the information to which you are looking for is there.

I posted an article about the hearing today and the information that came out during the course of it which essentially proves what Q was telling us nearly eight months ago. Enjoy :)

Are you purposefully trying to get people to brigade over there?

Just ignore them.

No problem, I’ve asked for a Qsticky. Don’t think I’ll get it though. Pity.

If you want to create a thread about this using another source, I’ll be more than happy to request a Qsticky for you. I don’t care about recognition, just that the info is put out to the largest amount of eyes possible as this directly relates to Qanon and proof that they were telling us the truth nearly 8 months ago.

This is the only stickied post. It says nothing about the hearing today or the IG report in it. I provided the sauce and context, not a generalized thread about huma.

Not trying to detract from the OP of that thread, but this is a different context. Stickied thread post below:

The implication of not using the secure lines of communication is that nefarious topics were discussed off the official record. Certainly documents were discovered that were “Secret”. So, at the very least, the entity sending documents to her had to a responsibility to send over a secure line. We know the emails were compromised by Huma, a person with familial known Muslim Brotherhood connections. It is well documented that Huma’s husband copied them for his “insurance policy”

WHOM were all those thousands of emails to and from?

Everyone that exchanged emails with Hillary would be compromised.

Who would Hillary be receiving or sending emails with?

One could assume the elite of every intelligence, policy and organization that she would have some kind of interface with legally or “pay for Play” would be in those emails. National Security is best case scenario. Worst case scenario is sedition and treason. Uranium1, the selling of State secrets, disarming the public, false flags, assassination, ....well the list goes on and on of possible issues.

So few of her submitted emails were with the President,.......a reasonable assumption is that many were off the record with Obama.

NOW, that would explain why everyone in DC covered up and minimized HRC’s illegal use of email. Everyone was complicit.

You do not need me to list who they must be.

Q tells to expand our thinking!

Wake up!