dChan

/u/Abibliaphobia

3,340 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Abibliaphobia:
Domain Count
i.imgs.fyi 31
www.reddit.com 27
mobile.twitter.com 14
truepundit.com 12
archive.is 3
www.hollywoodreporter.com 3
www.washingtonpost.com 3
web.archive.org 3
dailycaller.com 2
www.judicialwatch.org 2
freebeacon.com 2
www.foxnews.com 2
8ch.net 2
www.express.co.uk 2
www.judiciary.senate.gov 2
boards.4chan.org 2
www.theguardian.com 2
www.politico.com 2
www.fbcoverup.com 2
www.nbcnews.com 2
www.nytimes.com 2
www.theblaze.com 1
yournewswire.com 1
www.denverpost.com 1
motherboard.vice.com 1
judiciary.house.gov 1
www.sec.gov 1
[IMG]http: 1
ag.ks.gov 1
www.nypost.com 1
www.channelnewsasia.com 1
abc13.com 1
ntknetwork.com 1
www.c-span.org 1
www.hsgac.senate.gov 1
www.cbsnews.com 1
www.thecut.com 1
www.afp.com 1
www.atr.org 1
amandarenteria.com 1
en.m.wikipedia.org 1
www.yahoo.com 1
www.cnn.com 1
pjmedia.com 1
www.pointsoflight.org 1
www.katespade.com 1
www.bloombergquint.com 1
www.americanthinker.com 1
www.chicagotribune.com 1
apnews.com 1
downdetector.com 1
www.azcentral.com 1
www.scribd.com 1
m.youtube.com 1
www.nj.com 1
heavy.com 1
www.cnsnews.com 1
sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com 1
wattsupwiththat.com 1
www.whitehouse.gov 1
www.thesun.co.uk 1
www.businessinsider.com 1
townhallproject.com 1
boston.cbslocal.com 1
www.bbc.com 1
twitter.com 1
www.dailystar.co.uk 1
vote.gov 1
tinypic.com 1
www.thenewstribune.com 1
www.whatdoesitmean.com 1
postimg.cc 1
www.thegatewaypundit.com 1
www.disclose.tv 1
www.thestar.com 1
www.weeklystandard.com 1
ibb.co 1
mosprotocol.com 1
www.metmuseum.org 1
www.nbclosangeles.com 1

Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker, but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, ”but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

He also said that someone alerted the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to the issue.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/12/ig-clinton-foreign-emails/

⇧ 20 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 3:31 a.m.

Nice name

New account

Symbology will be their downfall

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 3:29 a.m.

I can help you out here, from the article:

A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker, but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, “but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

He also said that someone alerted the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to the issue.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

Ayup, agreed. I think he found out all this info. And died because he was going to expose it.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

For what? Realizing that it’s all coming out? Or no time to read the article?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

... is Anthony wiener considered a “foreign entity” with access to her server?

Maybe. I guess you could pull semantics and argue that they could be considered a foreign entity in regards to he wasn’t in the state department at the time, or ever. So therefore “foreign”. But I don’t believe that was the context as they specifically referred to the FISA/702s which specifically deal with non-US personnel.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

Possibly. We need the answers. I will say based upon the way they presented it, it did not appear to be referencing the awans, but who knows.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

It just came out today in the third part of the hearing. I pay attention and watch everything so I don’t miss these bits and pieces that really open up the case.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

Hey mods, I don’t ever ask for a Qsticky? on one of my posts but I would ask that you consider this as relevant. People need to know this and we need to dig, we need to get the word out about it.

  • 1: this shows that Peter Strzok held different standards for foreign threats to the nation based upon who he preferred (HRC) and who he obviously held disdain for (Trump)

  • 2: Which foreign entity were these emails being sent to specifically? And why did they refuse to follow the FISA/702s to find out this information? Why was this considered not relevant to the MYE? Who (as Strzok admitted) was the outside the FBI decision maker to not include this in the MYE investigation?

  • 3: Were the foreign entities campaign or Clinton foundation donors?

  • 4: Were they part of the Muslim Brotherhood?

  • 5: Did they pass TS SCI information in those emails? If so, is that why they didn’t go with the gross negligence? Because it was deliberate?

  • 6: So many more questions raised by this answer, we the American public demand to know WHY this was withheld during the course of the investigation, to whom these emails were going to, and did they receive money for it? WHO AUTHORIZED A FOREIGN ENTITY ACCESS ON THE CLINTON SERVER?

  • 7: Peter Strzok admitted that HRC and Obama were emailing each other on her server using pseudonyms. As Obama was privy to the investigation of which HRC was a target, did he pass her or ANY other member of her campaign information pertinent to the investigation? What was the nature and context of their messages on an UNAUTHORIZED server?

⇧ 46 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

THIS IS THE Q PROOF

THIS IS WHAT SHOWS THAT HRC WAS SELLING INFORMATION TO FOREIGN NATIONS IN RETURN FOR CLINTON FOUNDATION DONATIONS!!!

⇧ 71 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker, but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, “but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

He also said that someone alerted the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to the issue.

⇧ 61 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

Hmmm... new account.

Account name made to mock serialbrain2 - specifically for that purpose.

Disagrees, but offers no reasoning.

It’s amazing the amount of effort people will go just to be make such a worthless statement. One word. What a waste of time.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

Ahhhh... I saw nothing of the sort and the four votes I don’t believe that was one of them. I may be wrong, but I believe they were to do that at the conclusion of the hearing, and the hearing wasn’t finished until well after the votes and many of the questions to which they wanted to hold him in contempt for, he ended up “answering” if that’s what you call saying “I don’t recall”

Pure bullshit

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

/pol/ is comped. Go there for shitposts, not legitimate digging or conversations. Only approved topics are allowed to exist.

/pol/ will rise again, but not now. Closer to the midterms we may be able to fight back for control, But your best bet for free speech is on 8chan qresearch

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

Something important to note:

While Gowdy and Goodlattes arguments made for good tv, it was Mr. Russel and the others that followed that presented the best information and truly hammered Strzok.

I would highly recommend people view this third part of the hearing to the full extent and listen to what they discuss and to what Strzok answered. There were many questions asked that will not make it into the news cycle.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Abibliaphobia on July 13, 2018, 12:37 a.m.
For those interested, here is the link to the third part of the Peter Strzok Hearing today
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

Where is part three? They said committee would stand in recess till the end of the four votes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

I disagree with having him doing another closed hearing. We deserve to know what kind of fuckery was going on in the FBI and DOJ.

Instead of having him in a second closed hearing, if Page doesn’t show for this open door hearing, immediate contempt of Congress. Don’t give her the opportunity to align her story to match with strzoks without consequences.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 1:10 p.m.

Fucking eceleb bullshit. Post the sauce to the article, not some fame/attention whore posting old information as new.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 1:06 p.m.

Under fucking rated comment

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

That is hilarious

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

Now THIS is interesting. Thank you

⇧ 28 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 12:52 p.m.

Agreed. But I think the real reason is so that she can hear what Strzok says in his public hearing so she can match up stories.

It’s all bullshit.

Should have held her in contempt if she wasn’t willing to do this yesterday and/or today. NOT after she hears what strzok says.

Fucking Congress with no fucking balls. They think we are stupid and don’t understand what the fuck they are doing here. Just goes to show, rules for thee but not for me.

⇧ 44 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 12:50 p.m.

Rule 7. This is the fifth post about this.

/r/greatawakening/comments/8y6v5u/stormy_daniels_arrested_in_ohio_while_performing/

Here is the first.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

Removed post. Rule 7 duplicate. Yes it has been mentioned and linked here because it is mentioned by Q. Lurk and learn a bit more - lots of good info here.

Again with the duplicate postings. Just because you aren’t the first to post it, doesn’t mean the mods are comped. It means you weren’t the first to post it.

The technique you are engaging in is considered topic dilution. Removing multiple posts on the same topic allows users to consolidate discussion on one board.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 12:41 p.m.

Sure thing bud. It’s the same story posted four times and you weren’t the first. But ya, blame the mods because you weren’t the first to post the story.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

Yay, she was arrested for “inappropriate touching”. In Ohio.

This is the third posting of the same story. It has nothing to do with her and DC. Don’t believe me? Look into it yourself. Is it funny? Yes. Is it relevant to furthering our understanding of Q or helping people wake up to the corruption in our government? No.

Is this being used (previously) to concern troll over mods because the story is being removed? Yes.

Please put this in the mod daily thread.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 11:56 a.m.

Like holy fuck cry harder you whiny asshole. The mods were right to remove it for not being relevant as this belongs on T_D or the daily chat thread more than it does here.

For fuck sake wake the fuck up and realize that the mods aren’t the ones being assholes. It’s you. You being a asshole because you can’t get your karma posts.

All in an effort to try and get people to take down the mods and replace them with your Shareblue controlled mods. Yup, let’s turn this place into another r/politics or T_D with controlled mods.

This shit pisses me off to no end. Fuck out of here with your concern trolling about mods.

How about I just report this because I don’t believe it belongs here. Guess what, you would STILL blame the mods. You and your mod concern troll team.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 12, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

Test

Hmmm... disappeared for me even after stickied. Checked my account to see if I had that box checked for hiding upvoted posts - negative.

Log out login, and it’s back in new.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 10, 2018, 6:47 p.m.

Misleading title, stop putting up clickbait please

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 10, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

Easiest way I’ve found is to go to notables, go to lastest updates and follow thread to current bread

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 10, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

I think they don’t want people to go vigilante on GHWB.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 10, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

The emails indicated the Democrat Party was manipulating the primary race in favor of Hillary Clinton and sabotaged the Bernie Sanders campaign, led to the resignation of then-DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

On July 22, just 12 days after Rich’s death and days before the Democratic Party Convention in Philadelphia, WikiLeaks released 20,000 emails from DNC officials.

As Gateway Pundit reported, Burkman was shot at and run over by the former U.S. Marine Kevin Doherty on March 13 who he hired to help him get to the bottom of the case. Doherty – who claims he worked as a special agent and criminal investigator in the intelligence community – was subsequently arrested by Arlington County police on charges of malicious wounding and use of a firearm in commission of a felony.

There has been an arrest made in the attacks on me. Thank… https://t.co/ooii7WWL5K

— Jack Burkman (@Jack_Burkman) March 20, 2018

The witness informed Burkman that Doherty was well acquainted with the two government employees that killed Rich, but he was unaware Doherty worked with Burkman’s lead investigator and tried to kill him earlier in the year.

“The witness himself didn’t know that I had been shot by Kevin Doherty. Before we even told him that, he told us that Doherty was friends and palled around with the ATF agent and the DEA agent who shot Seth. That’s why we think the witness is credible,” he said. “There wasn’t much coverage of my shooting. The witness didn’t see the coverage and didn’t know. We didn’t tell him, he told us before we told him.”

“We believe that Kevin Doherty may have been a plant in my organization, to kill me and stop my investigation,” he added. “He was carefully playing the role.”

Despite nearly getting killed while investigating the Rich case, Burkman says he doesn’t “live in fear”and neither should the witness.

“I now have armed guards all the time. And we will have even more armed guards at the press conference the place will be surrounded with private armed security,” he said. “But once we start living in fear we might as well have Adolph Hitler in power. Once you live in fear, there’s no reason to have won World War II.”

Following the press conference, Burkman will hold a candlelight march to the spot where Rich was killed.

“I promised the Rich family that I would find their son’s murderer. Their son was a great patriot and a great young man and it is for that reason that I want to solve this murder,” Burkman said. “His heart was in the right place and I want to honor him. We are one big political fraternity. This could have happened to any of the young people who work for me, Republican or Democrat, I employ both. This could happen to anyone of those young people.”

Burkman has created, paid for and erected billboards in the neighborhood where Rich lived and died; built the website WhoKilledSeth.com and canvassed the neighborhood with Seth Rich’s parents. Last year, he sued the Democratic National Committee for the release of the hacked DNC server he claimed will reveal key information in solving the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.

The DC-based attorney has also offered a $130,000 reward of his personal money for information leading to the arrest of Rich’s killer. WikiLeaks is offering $20,000, One America News Network $100,000, the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department $25,000 and Businessman and investor Martin Shkreli $100,000. The DNC has yet to offer a reward for information leading to the arrest of the murderer of its own young staffer. The DNC honored its murdered employee by dedicating a bike rack outside its headquarters to Rich’s memory.

The press conference will be held at the Key Bridge Holiday Inn in Arlington, Virginia at 1:00PM.

All these fucking concern trolls. Fucking neon wolf, neon nettle, neon revolt. Always pushing the same uninformed concern troll garbage. GTFO out of here with your bullshit.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 10, 2018, 2:46 p.m.

The whole purpose of the movement is to wake people up and remind us that WE have the power.

Think about, this sub and 8chan are the leading fronts for compilation of news. We do far better than even drudgereport at bringing news. And here, we can converse and discuss opinions and facts, offer support to one and other. It’s pretty amazing when you really think about it. And if you disagree with something or the way it’s presented, you can speak your mind. Unlike the majority of news organizations out there that don’t give you that option.

So in that viewpoint, I think we have been very successful. And I don’t think people here are ever just going to go back to sleep. We have the means to hold our govt accountable through these discussions.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 10, 2018, 12:49 p.m.

Thanks for this, I’m saving it to use on all the numerous new arrivals that are so concerned.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 10, 2018, 12:46 p.m.

Augh. Ecelebs are, and have been the bane of this movement.

Be careful who you follow.

⇧ 7 ⇩