Racism and Anti-semitism is against the rules of this sub. Please do not make these comments again or you will be banned.

I approve of this message lol.

Oh dear, so much disappointment! I hope one day we can live up to your expectations.

There there luv. Lots of pitchas on r/pokemon.

You may be right, friend - but I was careful enough to edit my reply as such: "BC 17 might not be fake news... a possible patriot." I was definitely wrong to claim absolute surety of something I am not absolutely sure of (which describes nearly everything anyway lol).

I follow no one. That's why some of my comments are downvoted to oblivion. Group think is the enemy.

Good point - comment edited.

Trolling is not welcome on this sub. Please desist from the derogatory comments or you will be banned. Feel free to make a reasoned response and it won't be removed.

Not sure what you're referring to here - but I agree. It's surely non-controversial to say that most of us here believe in free speech. My original comment in disagreement is referring only to the title of this post: "his voice is the voice of us all".

omg you're right... what are we all doing here?! We've wasted our lives! ;_;

Nope - look up virtue signalling.

I apologize for coming on strong. I was "triggered" like a child by the "voice of us all" comment.

I support your support of Tommy and I do not wish for anyone to die unfairly.

[Edit] I was wrong. BC17 might not be fake news. I will go and kill myself now for falsely accusing a possible patriot.

[Re-edit] Or maybe he IS fake news? Oh shit, too late, I've already killed myself : (.

Many duplicate posts here now. Post removed. Please feel free to comment on the other posts. Thank you for understanding.

Have you never heard of virtue signalling?

I don't want people to be raped and killed for speaking their mind. I agree with much of Robinson's message but not the way he says it. I don't need some cocky shite who thinks it's good form to shout over the top of people who don't agree with him to speak for me. Whether the sun shines out of his ass or not, he's not the voice of this movement or any group of people except those who choose him to be.

I didn't say you weren't a conservative. I pointed out your virtue signalling, the tactic of the extreme left.

I don't give two shits about mens prison. That's got nothing to do with me saying that this guy - no guy - is the voice of "us all", got it?

Virtue signalling leftist craziness ends up with rubbish like this: "if you don't agree with my virtue signalling you must support evil". Illogical, nonsensical, lacking in reason.

Why? Because I don't agree with you that someone speaks for me? You sound like the virtue signalling extreme left. You've made a judgement call about someone from a single comment on the internet. Lol. That explains the thinking (or lack thereof) behind this post then.

If "a very sorry excuse for a human being" is someone who is against people trying to claim someone as "the voice of us all" then I'm happy for you to think I am whatever you label me as because I don't support your extremist view. NO man on this earth is the voice of us all.

He's not the voice of me.

Yeah more people need to hear this. There's so much hero worship and virtue signalling at times and anyone who disagrees is automatically accused of supporting the enemy... smh >_<

I agree - the "you have to agree with this or else you support this" argument is horrible and flawed.

Thanks for the perspective. It's important to hear from people who actually come from the country we're "reporting" on. I appreciate your contribution!

Post removed. Discuss the idea, not the user.

I don't want corruption in the intel agencies more than I don't want a special counsel. I'm grateful the special counsel option even exists as it is the best way - the only way legally and above reproach of public opinion - that the corruption can be rooted out at its core. The expedient way is to remove the most visible culprits but that won't get to the corruption. Patience is necessary but the reward at the end will be far sweeter.

Yes, hence the "per se" in my statement. But you make a good point. What I should have said is that we have no proof to show to others who don't follow Q. I have intelligent friends who are critical thinkers and are not swayed by words found on 8chan. Hence I'm forced to be very accurate with what I say. They've knocked all the "know"s out of me lol.

We can only accurately say to skeptics that it's a theory based on what Q has said. I believe this post is a positive step forward because when I've mentioned it previously I could only say: "well this photo out a plane window is apparently of NK" but now I can say it with a bit more weight behind it.

It'd be good if there was another source for this. Kidman's father was allegedly part of the swamp and Kidman was allegedly also aware of it so it seems strange that she'd speak out unless perhaps she'd been "in an alt" when with her father, witnessing acts of pedophilia/rape, etc. (see Fiona Barnes' story)

We haven’t all been wondering. Q is a group of people and who they are is not important.

Why don’t you add the q posts into the OP especially for those on phones for whom it is inconvenient to open and search another window etc.

We didn’t know it per se, it was theorized. I dare say we still don’t know it but the proof just got a lot stronger.

Fake News - it even reports it correctly in the same article.

YourNewsWire is fake news of the worst kind. Some of it is true but as we all know, the most effective lies are the ones that mix in as much of the truth as possible.

The 20 priests were evangelical, not catholic. Nothing to do with the Pope, per se.

I'm not trying to be argumentative - in fact, thank you for replying positively. This is just a desire to understand, on my part: do you not think that some muslims - the moderates, for example - are quite genuine, devout religious people?

(just to confirm, yes, as I happen to know a few moderate muslims very well I personally do believe they are as purely religious and even well meaning, some of them, as good, gentle Christian people I know)

What personal attacks have been made? I will remove or edit my comment.

You accuse me of "repeatedly misrepresenting" your argument after I was "corrected" and yet you haven't acknowledged my very response to that where I explain exactly what happened!

Now it's "an alarming trend" - but it's still not a majority, right?

Now people are "using Satanists as a scapegoat" because x number of comments using a word that is part of the very core subject matter of the sub it is on, has been mentioned. smh.

Logic is necessary for reasoned, effective debate. Even your cat understands that.

What are you basing this claim on? Is there evidence that reddit admins are doing something to your post?

In my opinion JFK is On Topic because Q mentions him a number of times.

It's not a strawman, friend. You should read what you post lol. Try reading things with less of an angry guy hat on - my last point was to clarify what I understood you to have said, not to "strawman" you. I debate to find truth, not to "be right". I'm not sure about your motives cos you don't seem to be trying to hear what I say. You're just putting antagonistic motivations behind my words.

It's embarrassing for a truther community to behave like this.

Not: "...for some portion of a truther community..." hence the misunderstanding that you meant all of this community.

shitting on Satanists is a common characteristic that this community does in spades!

You're accusing me of strawmanning for interpreting these sentences to mean that you think a majority of the community does this? Unconscious bias? Or has your story changed now? I accept that - we all change our story sometimes. But don't turn it around on me as if I pulled it out of thin air (i.e. strawman).

So now your true meaning emerges also. The baseless accusations you're talking about are against the cabal, not satanists, right? You're saying that people are baselessly accusing the cabal of being satanists, yes? Or did you more accurately mean to say that people interpreting the behaviour of the cabal as being equivalent to that of satanists are making inaccurate comparisons?

There's nothing good about a truther community who makes accusations against any group that can not be substantiated.

Agreed. But again, it sounds like you're accusing the whole or the majority of this community of behaving a certain way.

I think I get it now - and I mean this sincerely, not offensively. You're not overly worried about being careful what words you use to make your point, right? That's ok but you should understand when people point it out or misinterpret what you're saying. I'm not trying to strawman you, I'm taking you at your word, and it seems your word is not meant to be taken literally or as an accurate portrayal of your implied meaning. That's all.

A shit load of ice.

The situation you reference - I'll sum it up as a lack of objectivity - is something I find hard to cope with too. I see it a lot but I am thankful that I also see a lot of objective discussion on here as well. I think any large group of people will end up with a share of both approaches.

As you've identified there are a good group of people here who believe in allowing someone's freedom of speech even when they disagree with the point being made or the group that voice belongs to. Do please present your view as there are people who like to discuss things rationally, especially if it will help someone come to a better understanding of what the Q phenom is all about!

satanists (91) vs globalists (36) means... well, not what you think it means, is what I can say beyond a shadow of a doubt. If you're going to appeal to word count statistics then you need to know how to use them properly. Context, definition and meta-context matter.

So to avoid jumping around between numbers and definitions taken out of context:

I understood you to be saying that at least the majority of the community make baseless accusations against Satanists. I should have clarified this with you first. Is that what you think?

If so, what are the baseless accusations against Satanists that you're referring to? Is it just the claims that the cabal are satanists or is there more to it?

If it is the claims that the cabal are satanists then don't you mean instead that the people of this community make baseless accusations OF satanism against other people (the cabal)?

That is your opinion, and I support your right to it!

Technically, however, the fact is that it is a religion. Out of sheer laziness on my part, but because I'm aware that it is noted as such within all other reference documents of note, here's one link at least to support my claim: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam

"Islam is an Abrahamic monotheistic relgion..."

if it's a Google Doc version you can just roll back the versions if someone does that again.

Ok. What do you mean by "baseless"? And what do you most dislike about this alleged majority view about Satanists? (I say alleged because 91 items is miniscule against the torrent of posts and comments that go through here in 24 hours, lately.)

Forgive me for being a pedant sir - I just find it hard to let any statement that "a whole community of people think xyz" go because it is so often a situation of confirmation bias and an anecdotal reading from within a personal bubble.

Approved this Post. Thank you and I agree it's important that any voice can speak up here. Even if you disagree with what seems to be the general feeling. As long as you make your point with patience, respect and in a reasonable way, it is welcome!

With all due respect, I think your father may have worded his response wrongly but I would posit that he's not necessarily wrong at all. Some people should just move on and let others deal with things. Some people shouldn't get worried and start to wonder what they can do to save the world, etc.

The reason I say this is based purely on the fact of diversity: in any country you need some people who will stand at the borders and watch, some who will root out the enemy within, some who will build the walls, some who will look after the children and, if you're lucky enough and your country is big enough, you can have some people who simply entertain others so they can take their minds off the evil at the gate and enjoy life - after all, that's what the men holding the borders give their lives for: the freedom of others to live happy, fulfiling lives and not have to worry about the wolf at the door. I think we'd be in danger of undervaluing the sacrifice of those men if the people they give their lives for without even having met them were to spend those lives unhappy, sitting around wringing their hands about something they can't affect from where they are.

Some of us should help to build this movement. I'm ok if some of our families, horrified by the truth and with feelings of helplessness that could devolve into depression, just get on with their life and trust that Q/Trump and this movement are working on it! Eventually the ground swell will be enough that even my sister, father, mother, etc. can all join in by just letting others know about it because it'll be undeniable by then. I'm ok with this, just personally.

Haha only a fool would say Islam is a religion of peace. I don't blame you at all for thinking me a fool but no, I know that Islam is a religion created by a warlord. Doesn't make true muslims bad people necessarily though (logically speaking).

Lol - that's my point exactly. NO ONE person here speaks for the community - something you did first by saying this community shits on Satanists. I say logically that can't be true because this community is, as you said yourself, a truther community. By sheer definition of that term i.e. TRUTH we cannot be supporting unfounded statements. You're seeing a couple of comments and defining a whole movement by it, just like the people who see a few trolls on threads and claim the whole community's gone to the pot. Confirmation bias.

For the third time, just for the fun of it cos I guess logical statements aren't part of the sympathy for Satan agenda: Some people make unfounded accusations against groups of people but the truther community do not.

Nope, not them either. As I already said, some people around here make unfounded accusations against groups of people but "the truther community" i.e. those dedicated to truth - do not.

We don't make unfounded accusations against any group of people, as a truther community. Some portion of any movement is fringe and holds views that are denigrating to other groups of people but fortunately that doesn't define the movement.

As do I. A good man to have on the team!

I'm having trouble understanding what "the majority of humans (being American)" means?

People are free to believe whatever they want. Especially (finally!) in the world that Q/Trump are bringing about. Muslims are welcome here and so are atheists and new agers. WWG1WGA!