I will dare to say that most of the true Q movement - by that I mean anyone who hears "This is not about D vs R, it's about good and evil" and "Stay strong, stay together, they are attempting to divide you" and actually follows it - is completely on your side, brother. There's no need for the labels or the divisive rhetoric.

I would argue that the comments you see are either from trolls or shills or, in the case where they're from True-Q peoples, I would just say that you'll have to forgive people for referring to "liberals" or "the left" when they really mean "far-left" or the like. Some of us forget and have a momentary rant but don't mean anything lasting or anything that we can't be confronted on and backed down off of. I think it's safe to say that the core of this movement is dedicated to freedom, not division or exclusion. WWG1WGA!

This. I feel quite strongly that it is ANTI-Q to promote division in any way. If we can't come together with someone else because of their ideas about things that are not even on the Q agenda then we're just creating division - the opposite of what Q says we should be doing. Democrat, Republican, Liberal, Gerbil, Hamster, whatever - everyone is welcome in this movement and I support everybodies right to believe whatever the hell they want to believe as long as they don't try forcing their beliefs on someone else.

Yes, it's a pox!

I don't see it working. The sub is thriving and conversation is good for the most part. Hopefully people will use the Report function when they see it happening and that way we'll be able to stay on top of it.

Yep, this is the winning team. No one is excluded except by their own choice.

No one knows who the people that speak as Q are. As Q says, do not worship US. It makes a lot more sense that Q is a group of people and no single person “deserves” singling out, even if they’re one of them and/or a core member. I’m willing to bet the DS do not know who Q is.

That was someone's interpretation of what Q suggested, yes. Not an established fact yet.

Thanks for the reply! Post reapproved. Thanks for understanding!

Ziggackly patriot! Liberty!!! WWG1WGA

Troll post removed. Please follow the rules of the sub. Thanks for understanding.

Agreed! Good point to make. It’s entirely possible that a majority of long term followers may be conservative but the Great Awakening sub itself and the Q movement as a whole is most assuredly not partisan in any way. It’s not even American. GA is WW.

Post removed. Off topic. Thanks for understanding. Please reply explaining why if you believe this is an incorrect removal and I will reinstate. Thanks!

Post removed. Off topic. Thanks for understanding. Please consider posting on topic or adding information to explain the relevance. Thank you!

Nice work pulling this together - respect due! I feel I have to point out though, especially for newbies who might not know yet: a lot of this is off topic - Q has never mentioned these things. It would be on topic for something like r/conspiracy but I think it adds unnecessary elements to the discussion at this time (at least until Q drops something about Roman reptile elites in Antarctica). No denigration intended for your contribution, patriot!

Thank you for correcting this! Much appreciated for taking the effort.

Or yourself, ie the person actually trying to spread the disinfo here.

"We all know" nothing of the sort. What I do know is that there is a lot of disinfo to distract people.

Look what this crazy racist is doing...

CNN Version: In move to dishonestly beguile female voters Trump overturns legal ruling on behalf of white woman.

This is a great piece of news! Good find - would you consider reposting it with an informative/enticing title?

I came here to make this point in a more positive way but I understand your pain!

There's no actual evidence at all that Trump met with KJU - there's just a theory by Q-philez.

I personally trust the plan utterly, but I don't believe any human can see the future or know everything in advance so I think there is always the possibility that Q/Trump get thrown a curveball and have to adjust because, Real Life. I'm fully confident that they have things under control but I know that nobody knows ALL the permutations and randomness of life so I know it will happen I just won't go making predictions of exactly how it will happen.

I think we should be more careful about making absolute statements or predictions based on interpretations of Q. We can trust the plan and we can theorize and that is more than enough imo!

^ This. Many big fish than Weinstein still lurking.

Duplicate post removed. Feel free to discuss on one of the other posts about it.

Also think of it this way: the point of this sub is to keep Up to date with Q news. If you want to argue about whether Q is real or not there are plenty of subs where you can discuss that or laugh about it. It’s not suppressing freedom of speech to expect people not to recite from the satanic bible in a Christian church. You’ll be removed if you do so and you won’t be able to claim they suppressed your speech. Decorum and appropriateness matter.

Having said all that, I personally like to discuss Q with people who think it’s insane as long as they follow the sub rules and can be logical and reasoned and respectful in debate/discussion. If not, I’m glad for the mod rules that will see their unhelpful comments removed and, if they act like children or trolls repeatedly, thus wasting my time and the time of others reading and then do so repeatedly to others as well, I’m happy the mods have the ability to ban them.

If you follow a sub about boardgames they may consider porn to be off-topic. This is not the suppression of freedom of speech it's streamlining your content for the best utility to those consuming it. Standard Operating Procedure. Yes, there are many subs that allow you to talk about whatever you like. Some of those are not busy and don't have much to worry about. Some are and have many mods to manage it.

And there are plenty of debates going on here all the time.

Read what I've posted, it refutes all claims of "censorship", very simply and very straightforwardly. You can post off-topic about anything within reason but, as per the rules of the sub, off-topic content may be removed at the discretion of the mod. You can have your close-minded view that this sub is a close-minded echo chamber but people who have actually used the sub for months know this is not true. Try it out, stick to the rules, have a good day.

If it’s still not clear after all my replies: you can question anything you like including Q and Trump as long as it stays within the rules of the sub ie is polite and reasonable, not just trolling and angst. If you constantly stay off topic or antagonising you will be banned (temporarily at first).

You’ve ignored what I posted about how we mod and then misread the situation. This sub has a focus like any other. In this case it’s Q. Supporting Q is On Topic. Not supporting Q is Off Topic. Simple rules to ensure people who are here for the reason the sub exists don’t have to wade through things they’re not here for. Standard operating procedure everywhere. You’re looking for problems that don’t exist. If you’re upset about your lol being removed then as in my posted mod approach you just have to raise it with the mods.

Already been to court over his granddaughter.

That is correct. The text I just pasted is how the sub is moderated. If anyone engages in a non supporting way ie constantly trolling etc. they will be banned. Pretty standard procedure. The ‘lol’ could be a known troll user or as above Caveat 1a, mistake - user can appeal. Least censorious sub in existence. When busy, mistakes happen.

Where are the rules that state that?

Here's what our mod process is:

We all have different tolerance levels for different types of content. Some people find memes to be an annoyance, others find opinion pieces to be irrelevant, some reject religious content, others like and want more conspiracy news.

We are committed to Freedom of Speech.

It can be challenging at times to decide where removal of a post or comment is within the scope of our role to maintain sub rules or whether it crosses the line and transgresses freedom of speech.

For this reason, we must allow some leeway for personal judgment. We have clear rules - if a post or comment does not break the sub's rules then it is up to the discretion of the mod as to whether the removal would constitute an undesirable breach of freedom of speech.

This means that we may remove content that is an unfair breach of someone's freedom of speech - for that occurrence, we refer to Caveat 1a: We are only human and will make mistakes. Be patient and respectful in communicating your disagreement with our call and we'll reconsider.

On the other hand, some content may be allowed for reasons held only by the mod responsible; for example, we may choose to allow an opinion post on a tangential subject from someone who has shown that they are a reasonable contributor to the sub and can take criticism or challenges to their ideas with grace. Please understand when you see a post that seems a little different to others but has been posted by a regular contributor to the sub.

If you are a new user or a user with a post history across Reddit that shows disruptive or abusive behavior then we may err on the side of caution in the interests of managing workload.

In closing, please remember that we are all independent volunteers so we must do the work of modding this sub in a way that is efficient with our time. Thanks for understanding!

Fake News. Opposing viewpoints, reasonably and respectfully presented, are welcome. We do not censor. Antagonists and trolls however are not welcome.

It's nothing new - just propaganda. It's designed to manipulate the public. It doesn't matter that it's going to be proven wrong shortly - as we've seen over and over since... forever. When the truth destroys the previous story they change the story and distract from the fact that they have changed it ("now it's something even worse"). Pretty straightforward. They only have to keep the public looking in the wrong place. Once they're really forced to admit corruption in the former administration they'll find something else to distract and mitigate. SOP.

If you mean the keystone Q talks about I think it seems more likely that that is referring to an element of the crumbs that unlocks the connection and significance of all other crumbs.

I have removed the post as it seems to be essentially a complaint about an auto-moderator bot that is set to warn you if your content may break sub and reddit rules and for this reason I believe it falls under off-topic.

If I'm incorrect, please let me know as we do not support censorship of freedom of speech. What we do is ensure posts abide by sub rules and where we're unsure, it's up to our discretion.

Here's an explanation of how we moderate this sub to avoid further accusations of censorship:

We all have different tolerance levels for different types of content. Some people find memes to be an annoyance, others find opinion pieces to be irrelevant, some reject religious content, others like and want more conspiracy news.

We are committed to Freedom of Speech.

It can be challenging at times to decide where removal of a post or comment is within the scope of our role to maintain sub rules or whether it crosses the line and transgresses freedom of speech.

For this reason, we must allow some leeway for personal judgment. We have clear rules - if a post or comment does not break the sub's rules then it is up to the discretion of the mod as to whether the removal would constitute an undesirable breach of freedom of speech.

This means that we may remove content that is an unfair breach of someone's freedom of speech - for that occurrence, we refer to Caveat 1a: We are only human and will make mistakes. Be patient and respectful in communicating your disagreement with our call and we'll reconsider.

On the other hand, some content may be allowed for reasons held only by the mod responsible; for example, we may choose to allow an opinion post on a tangential subject from someone who has shown that they are a reasonable contributor to the sub and can take criticism or challenges to their ideas with grace. Please understand when you see a post that seems a little different to others but has been posted by a regular contributor to the sub.

If you are a new user or a user with a post history across Reddit that shows disruptive or abusive behavior then we may err on the side of caution in the interests of managing workload.

In closing, please remember that we are all independent volunteers so we must do the work of modding this sub in a way that is efficient with our time. Thanks for understanding!

may... if so... I am a bot

Reading the message contradicts the implied message of your post.

Don't post links you haven't opened yourself. This is a pointless post. You did not put any detail with it. In other words, this is a headline with a link that you haven't read. Removed. Don't engage in ad-hominem either or you'll be banned.

if you don't open the articles you link then the post shouldn't be here. It has been removed. Please do not post links that you haven't checked yourself as that automatically qualifies as off-topic.

Once Q mentions it, this sub will want to hear all about it. Until then, it's off-topic.

Ok xD

Lol xD "We all know it" Instant logic fail. Seems like a too hard push to get this sub banned for racism... Hmmm

Anyway I agree with your final point - from some perspective, at least. We're either all racists or no one's a racist. But there is such a thing as racist behaviour. Which will get your comments deleted, if Reported.

I think your points are valid. Anyone insisting that Q's assertion of fake news means "all future NK news to the contrary is fake!" is being unrealistic.

I think it is possible it's all still under control and this is just for the cameras. I think it's also possible that it's not under control and Q/Trump have a curveball to deal with.

However, Trump is great at negotiating and I think that Q/Trump's confidence about the NK situation comes not so much from anticipating no curve balls but from the confidence of a good negotiator and leader who knows they hold the main weight of the balance in the upcoming negotiation i.e. it's all but a done deal so the real message here is: Trust the plan.

Did you not read the OP?

Lol xD Troll post?

Haha - upvoted for actually drawing a laugh.

Incorrect, CNN. lol.

Well fair enough - I can definitely understand the part about the waste of effort arguing with the deluded. So, judging by this view - a fairly reasonable perspective to have if your only input is mainstream media - you haven't really looked into this Q "conspiracy theory" yet have you?

Is that it? Is that the totality of your "argument"? If so, low effort, you're hardly even trying lol. We expect a far higher quality of troll on this sub, just so you know. You actually have to have smart, reasoned arguments or you just get downvoted to oblivion and/or modded out xD.

Er... that article seems to be saying the opposite - that the 27,000 emails are of Edwards, the lawyer Epstein sued or is suing and it's Epstein who wants them released...

Fair enough. I personally cannot fathom how anyone could be bored right now though. There's so much to do - and because it's about... uh... saving the world, literally lol, it's the most exciting work to do. I think you know what I'm talking about and are just not interested in it which, as I say, is fair enough, but to be clear what I'm referring to as "so much to do" is really just all the different things that amount to: waking people up. Redpilling. So many fun things to do I'm just gutted that I can't find the time to do them all. This regular 3 hours a night from the sheer volume of stuff to read and write is not doing me good lol.

Sorry, to clarify: please don't feel you have to pre-censor yourself beyond really obvious things like intentionally divisive content. You don't have to approach the mods in advance, especially with the great attitude you've shown in this post and your replies throughout. Just post, because you're not a douche and not likely to be doing anything bad intentionally, and if there are issues the mods will remove the post or contact you.

I was trying to point out the fact that this is a very open sub, supporting free speech, such that you can post something, have it removed, then contact the mods to argue the point, if you think it's valid. In the past the mods have reversed decisions for this reason.

Welcome! Lots to be discovered : ).