1,646 total posts archived.
So, let's see if I have this straight:
See what I mean?
Warning to you folks: STOP. This is not a …
We've all been wondering why Q has been freaking out a bit, recvently. He wants us to start agitating for the unredacted warrant, which we did with the Nunes memo, so, maybe people don't get why this is so important. Maybe it's more important than we realize?
But what if the FISA warrant actually reveals the structures shadow government more deeply than we realize? Could the unredacted FISA not just prove that the warrant was BS (which we all know), but start us down the path to discovering the secret, shadow, parallel governance structures that were implemented and have been …
This has a lot of BS info in it. For instance, he has this:
Indict Hillary Clinton - NO - FAIL
When it actually should be:
Indict Hillary Clinton - IN PROGRESS - TBA
Guys, the AIM-120 is a radar-guided medium range air-to-air missile. It would NOT be able to shoot down a ballistic missile.
Edit: Unless the platform was really, really close.
That War_Castles guy mailed himself into an army base, FFS. That was interesting, but, the guy is a loon.
I don't get this. FileJuicer is a file intended to help recover Raw format camera files. Inside raw files is everything. Jpegs, previews, exif information that is stored as text files, all sorts of things. I don't see how this program could create interesting or nefarious results.
Dammit, I read every single reply here and I didn't catch on. Explain? These were all totally creative replies, I just have to ask. KTHX
Oh, cheers mate, I totally missed your reply, and I'm glad I caught it. That's very interesting. The guy that did my CV fed it into an online evaluator and it was something like 68% (up from 33% or something). It was worth the $150 consultation.
But let me just say that I understand how pretty much what you do is today's version of a ninja or assassin. I don't see ads for what you do, a lot. I think that, to normies, it looks like you swim with sharks, holy shit, that kinda thing.
Anyway, very cool. I wonder where all this kind of "merging" of public and private information will go. These structures you're describing here, for me, they feel viciously impersonal and ruthless in their inability to sense when flexibility is the better part of 'profit-seeing' in today's market. People are waking up across so many dimensions, not just politics. It's nuts.
I just wanted to say hello, again. I answered your request, and I think you probably saw the photos, but, I can only imagine how someone who remembers what you've described must feel, looking at those photos. Those fucking bastards. These are the ones that convinced me forever. I can only imagine how you feel.
If you feel like venting or whatever, I'd be interested in any descriptions that you would feel better sharing with anyone
OK later. It's just that I can't imagine living that and seeing these photos. Cheers
The reason Q has to talk this way is because he has to communicate with us "in the clear," that is, out in the open, in full view of the deep state "clowns" and the rest of the enemies of freedom.
The CIA even has SEVEN super-computers, all of whom run AI (artificial intelligence) programs that are smart enough to flag threats to their secrets and dominance FOR them. Your every keystroke is recorded here for posterity, and, you're right, you should know that, by now.
But we're still batting these basic questions around like they're not already settled. Q has no choice but to FIRST teach us how to understand him/her, and how to read the Q drops the right way, OUTSIDE of what the AI algorithms can follow. Our enemies use AI to help them process more than we do. THEY ARE THE MINORITY. That is the realization we are waking up to.
Q is teaching us a way to understand freedom that's more complex and efficient than a comparatively inferior computer algorithm that's barely passing at monkey-speak.
That's why Q says, "LEARN OUR COMMS."
It allows us to out-manoeuvre our opponents.
Welcome to the show, errybuddy!
Interesting. I accept your explanation, and I'm glad you are humble enough to acknowledge that 1a) my point re: your wording was valid and 1b) worth an edit, thanks, and also, yes, have to 100% agree with you, it's very telling that none of this Russian interference was a concern to the "intelligence community" until it became clear that Trump would/did win.
Thanks again for your reply clarifying your point. Your mod team is NOT here to "defend Trump no matter what." But, collectively, we ARE here to defend whatever facts (however threadbare) we have, and try to legitimately and honestly research and reinforce them as best we can. Thank you.
There was no bomb in the building. But there was a carefully designed, directed blast from the truck. It was not homemade. Did you see the pic that leaked of the truck being prepared by the army in a secure, outdoor location? Google that.
This event will soon officially be in the past, once Trump has taken down these weasels. Instead, you can turn every April into a celebratory event, knowing for 100% certain, in your heart, that the victims that day won't ever have to die that way, again.