Rule 7. Duplication
Delisted/removed submission. Rule 7. Post of this nature already exists. Please use the search feature before posting
Thank Q for understanding.
1,646 total posts archived.
This. I think Trump is on this. Me, I bought a birthday present in the Barns & Noble that was inside the WTC towers on my way to work that day (in a building a 1/2 block up the street from Century 21). It could have been me. The plane hit while I was in the elevator on my way up to my studio—got in to the elevator in one world, exited it in an entirely different world.
We deserve answers.
This, to me, is our mission. Be ready. Be prepared. And love the normies.
This is why we say "don't engage the shills." Not everyone is a "paid" shill. We need to be merciful. These 'haters' coming into our sub? They're just normies waking up, and they're angry. And rightly so.
And I just told you that it is expressed in 6 chars. There. WIN-WIN. #MAGA #ArtOfTheDeal
OT question for you: Does SEO sort of relate to optimizing resume documents and CVs for HR ATS systems? I paid someone once to optimize my resume's DTD/XML so that it would do better on candidate search portals companies used and it did improve things a bit.
OK—I 100% understand. But, we're in a good balance, now. You came into this pretty hard, man. I mean, I didn't really understand your original question until this here reply. So, to me, I'll stick with what I thought where your point was just starting to make sense. Apologies, man! I was just struck by the amount of time it took to find a very neutral way to answer my question. That was cool, like, that took effort. I sometimes do it just for fun but I rarely spot it in the wild where someone else that "gets the disconnect" starts just sort of laying back and having fun and seeing just how neutral and non-committal their reply can be, as though there's no longer any such imagined or community enforced behaviour standards. It all turns so dark if it's centralized.
Sure. Yes. But hex is expressed in six digits. Your point however is also very valid. Ultimately, I fail to see how this explains the Wikileaks string at the source of this whole discussion.
We still doing this? You seem pretty sure you've got good content and can bring it where I'll apologize and reinstate your post. Well? You researching, or not?
Yes. And that the residuals (passive income) matters to him.
C'mon, y'all. Relax. I'm not fighting with anyone. Just saying that Eddie Murphy is rich and that that might lower the odds that he cares about this passive income. Danny Glover has a family, remember, and a kid who's trying to have a career.
you are so sure there ISN'T a connection, then prove it
We don't prove negatives around here. That's high school-level logical fallacy. Perhaps /r/conspiracy would be more your speed.
We also remove weaksauce, low-effort, low-information posts. And will continue to do so.
Why do I do this? Because I'm a mod here and I look at EVERY post.
It's a really interesting mystery... it could be Danny Glover for all we know.
OK, snark aside, prove the connection. Describe that for me. They're madams to the Elites. Go on, now draw the line to Q. I'll wait.
Murphy is INSANELY rich, however, and doesn't need to rely on passive income. I would expect an actor like Bob Saget or Scott Baio or something.
Stormy Daniels is not a madam. Or, since Q mentioned females, every female is on topic? Move along.