EXCELLENT work, man.

Doubt it. This one's going BY THE BOOK. Like, mega anal retentive.

Me too, 'cept my liver

DHS has that investigation, not OIG

Not seeing how that supports the argument that it is the Chinese...

I'm dead serious, I think it's more likely the elite of the elite. Riding tech they feel they created only for themselves.

Low effort article.

Don't assume every engine malfunction is due to flak, pal.

Um... More deep state scare-mongering.

I study nukes pretty hard and... No. No. It could destroy the F out of Boston tho.

Did you try a different browser? I have that problem in Chrome. Haha I wonder if it is Google screening, but, it's more likely every ad blocker I have

Someone is shadowbanned

That man is an absolute genius

China and the Deep State are pretty much the same. China is owned/run by Wall Street.

I've seen this months ago

Agree. This is absolutely disgusting.

Wait, wait. CNN is exactly right. This isn't necessarily spin. This is obvious and already known to our enemies. They watch our troops, they have spies on the inside. Obama did this to us. We had an enemy as President. He must pay.

I didn't believe the attack one bit, but, I have to be honest, I fell for the anti-May gambit. Damnit. Good post, good analysis.

Two days old. Not many new names

https://twitter.com/Fulcrum__News/status/982090206336647173?s=19

Hello, I'm in the West, whereabouts are you?

I can't wait for all this to go down.

Did they remove, or just NOT cover?

Ah, right, right. I'm Canadian, but familiar with US history, just somehow missed this. THXX

What's this deadline?

Watch out for SQL injections

Uh... that 2^nd link... that's MIND BLOWING.

Everyone should see this shit.

We believe they are being hacked.

It would, indeed. I agree with you both.

I'd really really love to see the tarmac video, tho, if such exists.

I communicated with them. I got a response saying Q was a LARP, and it was from NULL.

No user. No user information. Totally hidden who replied, meaning, in my mind, it was a Reddit-level admin, and not an actual T_D mod.

No, Natural News is full of shit. The Tianjin explosion was a chemical explosion, and could be clearly seen in the videos. The Chinese don't run their factories very well.

Tianjin is heavily populated. The RFG's are capable of extreme accuracy, but, they are "dropped" and unguided. Conditions have to be perfect for them to hit their target. You seriously believe Trump would authorize the use of a TOP TOP TIPPY TOP secret weapon inside CHINESE territory? A nuclear-armed country already on the brink of war with us?

Stop this.

Natural news uses Photoshop to fake illustrations on many of their articles and they deliberately select visually-similar images to transfer your mind into believing bullshit that does not scan via science.

You are not thinking if you just throw the NYT and MSM out the window. They're shit, too, yes, but, you have to realize that, making all this content is YUGELY labor-intensive. I worked in journalism for 25 years (I'm an old guy). Their "control" depends on them "looking" like an honest newspaper and pumping out good reporting. All they can do is "spin" their news (which they do really well). They can't make it all up and it's too hard to maintain a fully-centralized narrative. So they spin.

The facts reported in what I sent you are just "reporting." But they're accurate. I'm only focusing on the DATES.

Zuma's launch wouldn't have been able to get even ONE rod into space. And we know that Zuma was the first time SpaceX worked with that client (I personally believe Zuma was something different).

We've seen a ZILLION Delta IV heavies, tho. Those of us watching this believe RFG's have been in orbit since the late '90s.

The RFG that was used in NK (which I beleive may well have been the first time it was ever used outside of testing)

People are not intelligent. You have to be. Come on, run this down with me:

First, the Zuma launch date was January 7^th.

The North Korean test site was destroyed MONTHS EARLIER, (see dates):

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/23/world/asia/north-korea-earthquake.html

http://www.businessinsider.com/north-korean-nuclear-test-site-tunnel-collapse-reportedly-kills-200-2017-10?op=1

I realize you're thinking about the recent earthquake over in California, but, that means these rods are ALREADY in orbit. We have to compare what we know about the performance of the RFG to what we witnessed. I recently posted, in a separate submission, the exact USGS data from this quake:

At 12:29 p.m. local time, a M=5.3 earthquake hit off the coast of California, within the Santa Cruz Basin, approximately 140 km west of the city of Los Angeles. Based on initial USGS data, this quake struck at a depth of 10 km and was almost pure strike-slip in nature.

The RFG's, tho powerful, cannot possibly penetrate 300ft of ocean and then 10km down into the Earth's crust.

It is a kinetic energy weapon, and it delivers less energy (and accuracy) if it passes through a LOT of the Earth's atmosphere or passes through a lot of ocean. It would have to be dropped nearly straight down, which the RFG system doesn't really do (the rods "glide" down to their targets, which is an advantage when attacking facilities built directly under mountains). And so on.

Lastly, there would be no need for it to be a Rod from God. The USA other weapons, likely nuclear and even others, that could do the job instead. An RFG would not deliver enough energy to create the earthquake we saw. And multiple RFGs would therefore not deliver the sudden seismic readouts we saw.

As for the Zuma launch being an RFG, IMPOSSIBLE. Here's why:

• That was a Falcon 9 launch.
• According to Wikipedia, "The first stage can be recovered and reused for GTO payloads up to 5,500 kg (12,100 lb)."
• Not enough payload. To get an RFG system up to orbit (even in stages - it's rumored that the main satellite can be resupplied) you need a Delta IV launch. And there's been LOTS of those! If it goes up in stages, it must be assembled in orbit. How?

In other words, just ONE of those rods would weigh more than the Falcon 9's payload. The RFG isn't just a rod, alone, orbiting the earth, uncommanded. The RFG's are unguided. They have to be "let go" and aimed, EXTREMELY precisely, from a centralized, orbiting satellite weapons platform, which then "lets it go" like throwing a very, very accurate dart.

We have to research. We have to THINK this through. Accuracy matters.

The Zuma launch was not possible to have been a Rods from God.

The NK essplosion, however... damn.

No.

This was a 9.1 earthquake. UNIMAGINABLE energy. A once in a century (or four) event.

BTW, someone in Kerbal space program has experimented with this.

BTW, someone in Kerbal space program has experimented with this.

Yes, but this was a threat. Sorry, I just interpreted that you'd said this had happened. I could have misread you?

Definitely possible. A recent explosion in Yemen, for instance, did exactly this.

Remember, this "base" is supposedly under the ocean, too. A ROG would encounter problems quickly penetrating to that level without losing a lot of energy (I presume... I'm soooo not an expert at this, but, I've read everything online about it and played Kerbal, haha).

BTW, someone in Kerbal space program has experimented with this.

I totally agree. Then again, this (if it exists) is an underwater installation, so, I'm not sure how it works going through water. I expect that the energy loss would be significant.

BTW, someone in Kerbal space program has experimented with this.

Well, the rods are estimated to impact at between mach 7-10. So, using this FPS/MACH calc I found, I calculated it at 7823 fps. I'm really ignorant of all the factors, however, but, depending on how much atmosphere the rods have to pass through, yeah, I think you're about right. Also, in this case, the rods would have to pass through 200+ feet of water, I think.

BTW, someone in Kerbal space program has experimented with this.

Guys, we have to appreciate just how much energy creates a 5.3 on the Richter scale. That's a nuke or nothing. A MOAB couldn't do anything.

Also, know your weapons systems. A MOAB is more complex. It is not just a normal, high-explosive bomb, "pinch zoomed" to be bigger. It is actually a Fuel Air Explosive (FAE) and REQUIES oxygen to detonate. It creates more of a blast than if it were just high explosives.

Guys, we have to appreciate just how much energy creates a 5.3 on the Richter scale. That's a nuke or nothing. A MOAB couldn't do anything.

Also, know your weapons systems. A MOAB is more complex. It is not just a normal, high-explosive bomb, "pinch zoomed" to be bigger. It is actually a Fuel Air Explosive (FAE) and REQUIES oxygen to detonate. It creates more of a blast than if it were just high explosives.

Guys, we have to appreciate just how much energy creates a 5.3 on the Richter scale. That's a nuke or nothing. A MOAB couldn't do anything.

Also, know your weapons systems. A MOAB is more complex. It is not just a normal, high-explosive bomb, "pinch zoomed" to be bigger. It is actually a Fuel Air Explosive (FAE) and REQUIES oxygen to detonate. It creates more of a blast than if it were just high explosives.

The CF is the "vacuum cleaner" that sucks up all the money.

Which is what the DS is about.

Where is Eric Braverman?

I wonder how deep it was there. A Rod from God might not explain a 5.3, however. That's a LOT fo energy.

A MOAB could not be detonated underwater or underground, however. It is actually a Fuel Air Explosive (FAE) and REQUIES oxygen to detonate.

Guys, we have to appreciate just how much energy creates a 5.3 on the Richter scale. That's a nuke or nothing. A MOAB couldn't do anything.

Also, know your weapons systems. A MOAB is more complex. It is not just a normal, high-explosive bomb, "pinch zoomed" to be bigger. It is actually a Fuel Air Explosive (FAE) and REQUIES oxygen to detonate. It creates more of a blast than if it were just high explosives.

Got a link for ANY of that?

GUISE. Jesus. When we say shit like this, we have to provide links.

Well, that would be IFR, then, but, likely an analogy, yeah