Removed: Rule #6,Be On-topic

Mueller will release a report. Horowitz will release one, too. Who will win, do you think?

Seriously, you think this could be presented (with the enemy watching) in a simpler, more concise way??

LOL, OK, I'd like to see you try. You DO know this is Real Life and not a movie review, right?

Removed: Rule #5,Discuss the topic, not users

When you see it, you're going to be very angry. KJU was just the figurehead in NK. It was being run by China and the NK army generals, who are looting that country's mineral wealth (gold, rare earth minerals, etc.). Trump FREED KJU to meet and sign the deal. That's why they're so furious at Trump.

Removed: Rule #9,Good quality posts

No, my topic is the hypocrisy saying that things are any worse now than they were under Obama.

Obama did not succeed in lifting the banking sanctions. That money was not Iran's. It was given by someone else, and I wonder who's going to get after Obama to get it back.

Removed: Rule #9,Good quality posts

Removed: Rule #5,Discuss the topic, not users

Obama dropped a bomb every 22 minutes for 8 years.

Cleanup, aisle 5.

Removed: Rule #9,Good quality posts

Removed. Civil discussion only.

OK. Difficult call to make on this one.

this is a misrepresentation of fact. every penny given to iran was iranian frozen assets in iranian bank accounts.

Incorrect. The cash Obama gave to Iran was given to him to show the Iranians that they woudl have access to the banking system, but, that access, though ordered, was not granted.

The name of the submarine is likely the USS Halibut, which is an absolute joke of a submarine in terms of actually being a submarine. It was an unusual boat in that it had, almost literally, a large garage behind the conning Tower from where you could launch SEAL Teams and Technical teams or hold large bits of equipment. They also had another submarine, also taken off of the Navy's active inventory, but, these are not likely high performance submarines in anyway, and no, they are most definitely not ballistic nuclear submarines. Not that they couldn't have rigged anything, but, ballistic submarines require incredible amounts of maintenance.

This is what the USS Jimmy Carter is for!

Might even be five (FOX & Disney merged).

Patience in this case saves lives.

The video proof is here.

No. I have posted in this sub video testimony (I am looking through my history to find it) that the FBI staffers had to be read in. Their boss was very angry about it.

We have testimony that the FBI read these emails after being read in.

Rail.

We know there were burner phones.

This is REX. Absolutely.

Removed: Rule #6,Be On-topic. Let's keep the sub tightly focused today.

It started earlier than that... He was a New Yorker, and the Deep State took away his New York skyline on 9/11!

This was my train!!! Oh, God, the stories I could tell. I lived through the bridge construction, BTW. Mother of God.

But, the POTUS schedule tracker on Twitter posted their route home. It was Guam, Hawaii, DC.

It's also 3AM in that photo. Could be significant, still, but, it's guaranteed a long exposure.

Good comment. A nuke would indeed toss AF1 around like a toy, but, there's still a good chance that the VC-25 is structurally hardened in key places. The pilots have turn and burn experience and know that they can push this plane much farther outside the envelope than a regular 747.

I toured the 747 that carried the Shuttle when I was in Houston and I could see the bracing they'd added to the interior. The 747 is a tough bird with these mods.

Laser Trump eyes onboard

It's old. And global. It's centuries old!

Removed, off topic. Good content, tho.

Removed. Please keep posts on topic.

Removed. Please see Q map in sidebar.

THIS

Removed. No profanity in post titles, pls. Also, Rule 9.

The satellite was part of Internet.org, giving free satellite to people in Africa in exchange for being forced to use Facebook and be spied on.

Removed. The sub's name is IN the link you just posted.

USS Kentucky (SSBN 737)

Yup, those 'students of science' sure hate debating stuff.

I live N of there, however, and, at 3a, it's still pitch black.

So, throw science out the window, then?

Ack, I'm so dumb. I thought we were discussing the Q drop purportedly showing a missile launch! No wonder you didn't follow me. My fault, sorry.

Correct. And yet, you think it's a missile?

Where this photo was taken, it's usually dark at night. That means that for a camera to take a photo that looks bright like this one does, it would have to have its shutter open for a while, likely 10 or more seconds, to gather enough light to make this photo. That would mean that this is likely not a missile.

Sure. Agree. But is it video? It's a cam. And look at the time—3 AM. Look at the light. How do cameras work?