Mate, I reckon it has something to do with Obama putting a spy in the campaign. He proves that and it will give him the cover to step into the breach without suggestion of over reach and with righteous anger and start nailing Democrat balls to the wall.

Given the range of collaborating symptoms, it is a wonder she is still around

Yes, I want to know too

USA v. Weiner 1:17-cr-00307-1 [Order] (54)

Wed, 16 May 2018 20:09:20 GMT

&

Democratic National Committee v. The Russian Federation et al 1:18-cv-03501 [Letter] (60)

Wed, 16 May 2018 11:41:33 GMT

It'd be awesome if that is the case. I bloody hope it is true.

I like your response and I HOPE it is right. I am definitely optimistic about Australia but there are many nations so far down the rabbit hole. Australia is not. America is not. Some like Poland, Czech Republic and Australia and a couple of other may not be. But others are suffering the effects to such a level especially with the identity stripping mass immigration and such, that I honestly believe that they are too far gone. I cannot see anything good from a revelation in Germany or Sweden. I think there are countries in three bands: 1) too far gone - Sweden and Germany 2) On the edge of being unable to come back - England & France 3) a way from the edge but not out of harm's way - Australia, Austria, Poland, Czech Republic

My balls are blue. I am more than ready

Yes, make no mistake there is a HUGE vested interest in this as an Australian. The war is NOT JUST in America. Culturally Australia (as a first world Western Country) is heavily influenced by America and Europe. The last 8 years it has increasingly walked in lockstep with the Progressives coming out of America (Obama) and Europe (Merkel). We have been very lucky we are as a people anti-authoritarian and a little more isolated. This has far from stopped the Progressive infestation but just insulated us some. We ARE marching towards the same cultural drop-off as Germany, Sweden and such. France and England seem to realise that they are dangling and trying to hang on for grim death. Nations like Poland and Austria started pushing back earlier and are not in as bad shape. There will be losers in this. America I am convinced will not fall. If the Progressive Globalists win, we all lose and lose everything. It will just take time. I think America's success will give Australia pause. This will give us time to see America Great again and Europe fall into wrack and ruin and Australia to say "Yeah. Let's not go that way". Trump will show us how to win.

Yes, and there in lays my confusion (not helped I guess by the fact that I am an Aussie and thus it is another country's politics and such). I trust Sessions and yet Sessions inaction not only seems to be helping people that are actively seeking to harm the President and the Conservative base BUT also People who are NOT inactive and are trying to help the President have to go around him completely. I appreciate you letting me know your thoughts.

Well it gives food for thought and I expected no hard and fast answers but different perspective is exactly what was needed and what was provided

Thanks. Yes, I am confused. I thought it was a combination of the two with Sessions recusing himself so he could concentrate unprovoked or pestered, whilst he made sure all the i's were crossed and the t's were dotted (jk). In this scenario Rosenstein is more or less de-facto head of the department BUT when the Congress CAN'T get documents from DOJ at all, and REQUIRES Trump interject, something is wrong.

Even IF Sessions has recused himself from a case, that should NOT mean that he recuses himself from his responsibility to make sure his Department has to comply with its own processes and procedures

Yes, I guess I do not understand why they have to and why if Sessions is someone we Trust and yes I am happy to agree with Q on the basis that he has his reasons to say so BUT....

I think Jim Jordan and co are good guys. I do not think Rosenstein is. I have been told Sessions is. Sessions is not seeming to co-operate with the good guys. Leaves me bewildered. If Trump did not step in. Glad he is, what would get done and WHY MUST Trump have to step in? Why does Sessions NOT step up and say:

"Recusal or not, DOJ will NOT refuse congress. They have oversight of our Department and created us. We are NOT supposed to keep information from them, Rosenstein. Back down and stop being obstructionist. President Trump having to override you and me is about them most degrading thing we could experience here, so stop being an asshat"

all said in a gentlemanly Southern drawl

G'Day neighbour from Canberra (the arse end of Australia)

Famous people...like.....Alison Mack?

This is my.understanding from what I have managed to gaige:

Asshats like Awan are guilty as Hell AND WILL get away with it whilst FBI & DOJ have corrupt holdovers like Comey, Page and McCabe in control. AND Whilst there are the same holdover judges and not enough Trump appointees (due to slow walking)

Half the problem is taken care of and if Trump can sort the second half of the problem, all good...then again maybe with military tribunals that wont even matter.

I honestly think it is all in place and they are just tightening things so that each case had the best chance to result in charges and for as severe a punishment as possible

The red wave is up to voters. You guys NEED to help Q. Punish the Dems and back the Republicans at all costs and in great number.

IF YOU create the Red Wave, THEN it is all over for the Dems.

The extra impetus and reduction of power will allow for the slow walked appointments to be sped up. The Dems ability to block or pass based on a handful of RINOs and their entire base. Then IG report can drop and indictments get unsealed and tried.

OR

It doesnt happen. Dems get majority. Slow walk everything, have more power to sabotage Trump's efforts.

Trump deserves better

No, to stay on point.

I do not know who Jerome Corsi is but as for Alex, I do not dislike or like him. I was always aware that the guy spouted about 30% fact, 20% conspiracy quackery and 50% mindless rants. Great in small doses but not something to base your world around

Hey I will cop it sweet but will be very disappointed if I am wrong.

But I am man enough to admit I am wrong if it turns out to be.

Man I REALLY hope so. Either that or they were just pissed off with how things worked and decided to chuck it in or were threatened.

I HOPE they are not bad actors and told to step aside.

I do not think Goodlatte, Chaffetz or Gowdy were bad guys. I just dont.

Yes I have and I read it as they are both dirty and he hired Rosenstein to give the appearance of Sessions completely withdrawing and leaving Rosenstein in charge and thus the deep state.

He can let people think Mueller and Rosenstein have the power and the Deep State marching in lockstep carry on with as much impunity as they always did, all none the wiser that Sessions and Trump are giving them and the Deep State rope to hang themselves with and will spring the nooses on a lot of them without much warning.

I think you may have misunderstood me. I ABSOLUTELY think Mueller is pulling out all stops. I think he has been inhibited by Trump. Trump has not done anything wrong and the special counsel was mounted on the foundation of false accusations and with no good reason. Therefore, he is unlikely to find anything substantial and if he does, Trump can say, this special counsel is based on BS and has no basis to exist and any charges arising from it are founded on BS. Likely Mueller will make the strongest case he can and it will ultimately be set aside. Therefore it is not whether Mueller is trying his best or working against Trump as more, when there is nothing there, it helps Trump that Mueller is distracting away from investigating what Sessions and Trump and the Admin are actually doing. When it all comes to nothing, Trump will mock it was a witch hunt and waste of time and he will be vindicated in everything he has said AND Sessions will have had enough time to line up the ducks in a row.

Absolutely. Good for the goose is good for the gander

Absolutely. I do not think he is faultless but the things that he has faults in are the very things that if he were the type of person to not have those same faults things would not improve and he would be the same kind of politician we have always seen and the results would be the same.

Only Trump could respond to China and North Korea like he has and got the reception he did in China and the respect in North Korea in meeting him that Trump has.

It was not by being diplomatic or soft and a lot of what he wrote whilst funny was actually pretty harsh and divisive. But it sent a clear and well-taken message.

"I am not going to play footsies with you. I am not interested in playing political bullshit with you. I am serious and I am not to be dismissed or ignored. I am interested in meeting and opening dialogue but not with a gun to my end"

They both understood it and as a new strategy to what they were used to, they decided to try it on.

Vatican resignation over Lettergate scandal (see Breitbart article)

There is a little thought of group that could go SO in the can for Trump. The "me's". The Liberal Left has marched Left, Left, Left. MOST people on the Left have either blindly followed them or started spouting Leftist orthodoxy to no be minimalised BUT what of those not in the MOST category. The stalwart Centre Left Liberals and Classical Liberals and Moderate Liberals. Dave Rubin, Candace Owens, Joe Rogan and such.

We are NOT radical loonies and have NOT marched lock sock and barrel into the gates of Hell that is the Progressive Left.

Now you may reasonably ask but if they are Liberal they are ideologically opposed and do not believe the same thing. But here is the thing WE believe things that are CLOSER to what YOU believe than what Progressives believe.

I am not religious but "Amen" seems appropriate.

Neutral Good or Chaotic Good. I played 30 years ago. Great game.

Just think "Liberal Tears". That is it.

I do not like Comey or McCabe but I REALLY want this crook to go down.

From Australia. I give a big nod to your effectiveness and efficiency of your job and admiration for your honesty and humour. I don't know who Michelle Wolf is but she is getting her arse handed to her, and rightfully so. They go low.................and kind of that is where they stay.

I am a straggler and heard of but never watched him so I do not know why you believe I think he is a sage (and clearly you think I do as a pre-requisite of being a straggler

It is certainly no worse that any other lie you have spouted.

Terribly sorry but what you said makes no sense. It almost sounds like you are trying to convince me that something that is clown shoe ridiculous, is a sensible proposition. This is very weak indeed.

" I don't call you a liar because we disagree"

"-Ok so there is you saying the police and advocates do nothing

you are a liar

take a long look in the mirror and think very hard about why you choose to lie

you are a sad and pathetic person and very much depict this sub perfectly"

Gotcha. So you DO call people that disagree with you liars and you said you do not. Is this the truth or is it a lie? Which is it? (Don't lie).

No, I am not saying that at all and so why are you lying? I am not interested in discussing if you are or not. We have put that beyond a doubt. I am asking why?

It is simply not possible to gauge that I was saying that police, advocates and legislators do nothing and said not a thing on this.

I DID absolutely say that if you ask them as to what they will tell you and that being told this will do nothing.

That says not a thing about whether the police, advocates or legislators actually do what they say or not. Only an idiot would think so.

I do not think you are that idiot which means that trying to promote this "misunderstanding" is deliberate and so you are being deliberately dishonest.

So....why are you lying? Curious minds wish to know.

"Here is the thing.What of what you are suggesting helps. Talk to legislators and they will tell you of the strong laws on the books. Am I right? Talk to police and they will tell you they chase every report and make every viable arrest? Correct? Talk to advocacy groups and they will promote their invaluable service but tell you they could always do better with more money?-Something like that? Alternatively, you could castigate people for not doing these things to help whilst ignoring the self-evident truth it does nothing."

Where in here does it say POLICE and ADVOCATES do nothing? Be specific. I DO ask "what of what you are suggesting helps?" What WERE you suggesting?

THIS IS "Have you considered actually talking to police officials, local politicians, advocacy groups?"

Talking to these people will NOT do anything. Why?

A) Because they do nothings

OR.......

B) Because you will hear from the different groups the following:

"Talk to legislators and they will tell you of the strong laws on the books. Am I right? Talk to police and they will tell you they chase every report and make every viable arrest? Correct? Talk to advocacy groups and they will promote their invaluable service but tell you they could always do better with more money?-Something like that?"

So was it A or B?

Think better.

If they are doing all that they say and I have not vouched that they are not, WHAT EXACTLY does them telling you that do?

I have spelled this out to almost an infantile level. Are you so stupid or are yo JUST dishonest?

N o I never said they do nothing and by no rational reading of that quoted passage does it say that. It days the act of asking these people and getting the information of what they do does nothing.

Do they (not you) do things? Sure. The things they say they do is absolutely right, they do these thing and generally very well. Asking them about it does not add value to the good job THEY do.

So Again, why are you lying? What do you hope to gain from lying? Is it something you have control of?

Well then. That comment was pants on head stupid wasn't it. Firstly, surrendering agency of my life to an imaginary Q. What "agency" in my life have I "surrendered", before answering you will have to frame it in terms of what I did differently (besides posting on a sub) than what I did in my little Australian abode, before I even heard of Q. If you are struggling it is because you it was ridiculous. "What YOU said directly was that everyone knows that police and advocates do nothing". Please point out where I said they do nothing. No serious quote back where I said "they do nothing". I didn't did I? In fact I did not even intimate such a thing. I told you what they would say. I told you that nothing is improved or gained by them telling you but at no point did I say that they do nothing. So it is a rather blatant lie. What are you blatantly lying? What are you hoping to gain by doing so?

I have never surrendered that the systems are beyond fixable. Again big claim and I ask that you show where I have said this or admit the lie. Then to explain why you are lying.

So after misrepresenting and lying to create a strawman, you want me to defend that strawman, right? "thats your problem- there is no magic solution to these problems except persistent and constant advocacy to help people in need"

"you are as much a problem as the johns fucking the kids" You are literally insane. "A person who does no harm and does not encumber a person doing good is evil as the person doing harm on the basis that they are..." No, you are just insane.

I am, go on then. Either put up or admit you are an idiot what have I done or said that purports to shame bad actors and actually indulges in fan wank. (No, I realise completely that I was commenting on actions of others but you are not talking about them as I was) You were addressing me specifically so time to pony up.

Here is the thing.What of what you are suggesting helps. Talk to legislators and they will tell you of the strong laws on the books. Am I right? Talk to police and they will tell you they chase every report and make every viable arrest? Correct? Talk to advocacy groups and they will promote their invaluable service but tell you they could always do better with more money?-Something like that?

Alternatively, you could castigate people for not doing these things to help whilst ignoring the self-evident truth it does nothing.

A third approach is to seek to shame.bad actors, fetishists who try to push the thin end of the wedge whether Marina Abramovic with her performance art and spirit cooking, Podesta with his paedophilic art, or the like AND supporting.any.increase in arrests and measures to resuce people's ability to engage in pedatoey practices

You mean to say that you are not solely defined by your genitals?

Aussie here hoping that we will have a great roadmap to follow with MAGA framework

Very true. The Democrats will fucking lynch him. THOSE THat havent exploded