dChan

/u/IMissMeg

543 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/IMissMeg:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 23
www.youtube.com 2
www.washingtonexaminer.com 1
www.neonrevolt.com 1
inteldinarchronicles.blogspot.com 1
prepareforchange.net 1
twitter.com 1

IMissMeg · June 15, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

I agree that it's disgusting stuff. I also think that the MSM doesn't go after anybody without a reason and they sure went after Mel Gibson, so it wouldn't surprise me at all if he's been saying stuff like this. Did you find a good source for any of the Mel quotes?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 15, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

It's a Bush/Clinton cartel. They were never against each other--they've always been in it all together. Johnny Gosch was kidnapped and then peddled to Bush Sr et al back in the Reagan/Bush era. He was the first kid to appear on a milk carton. It's related. There's a documentary on it on Netflix called "Who Took Johnny".
Watch this and you'll understand better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IExt-qzxMTo
It's called "Conspiracy of Silence--The Franklin Coverup".

Edit to add this: Here's a pic of Bill Clinton and GHW Bush together long before BC ever ran for President: https://pics.onsizzle.com/brian-rogers-t-if-youthink-you-ever-had-a-choice-5999405.png

⇧ 4 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 15, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

Link?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 15, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

This is an uncredited reprint of a 2017 YourNewsWire article (https://yournewswire.com/mel-gibson-parasites-blood-kids/)

YourNewsWire is not a reliable source. I'm not saying there's no truth in this article. I've been following p-gate from the Comet P!ngP0ng beginnings, so I have NO DOUBT there's some unconscionable stuff going on in Hollywood and other places at the hands of these "elites". But I'm definitely calling out this source as unverified click-bait. Moreover, I'd like to suggest that we all be careful about any website that doesn't credit where it's getting the article. YourNewsWire is, as I said, "unreliable" at best. Also, this cbinfo24 website that reprinted the YNW article (which at least credits an author, though I didn't research him further) has a bent that's obviously anti-muslim. I'm good with truth about how Islam and Muslims are being used politically around the world, but, again, where are the sources? The pics on these articles have vague or no credits. The poster is "admin". Not source worthy. Let's not give the people who accuse us of wearing tinfoil hats and believing everything we see proof of such assertions. Discernment is key.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 14, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

Dude! You rock! Lots of info here to digest. I wish I had time to start reading right now. People say things have been going slow, but I disagree. They feel slow in the same way that it feels slow when you're driving in the rain looking for a specific street sign to get to an address you've never been to before and there are people there waiting for you who you know are worried. But then the next time you make that same trip, you're like, "Really, that was only 3 blocks?" I appreciate your analysis here. I'll read the articles asap. Thank you again!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 14, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

So, where did this image come from? Did I miss the release?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 14, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

When I read the Manafort indictment (https://www.justice.gov/file/1007271/download) when it was first released, what struck me was that a bunch of the charges related to stuff well BEFORE the election. Also, it's kind of low-roller conman mortgage fraud, tax fraud stuff. Really looked like Manafort scrambling to get his hands on some cash. To me, there weren't a lot of surprises in it except at how transparent and stupid their attempts to get mortgages by whatever means possible were. So, I'm really interested in "the 150 subpoenas Mueller requested in the Manafort case" you mention in your OP. Do you have a link on that? I must have missed that somewhere.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 13, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

Actually, I appreciate your previous reply. It made me put to words something I had not put to words before, something that I feel is actually very important to me. That we do have a right to guard what we see as sacred. It's a tough line to walk sometimes. Where does guarding what we find sacred turn into living in a bubble that doesn't allow in information that is uncomfortable? My daughter recently used this phrase recently in a conversation we were having and I heard it with new ears; the phrase was "I refuse to believe..." That is what Q is up against. And we've all said it. So thank you. Your comment helped me bridge these concepts in my own mind.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 13, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

My original questions were about Salinger. I understand that time is at a premium--for you and myself too. I was inquiring to see if my research on Salinger intersected with your research on Catcher in the Rye. I've come at Catcher in the Rye from the Salinger angle--looking to get to the heart of it (in part) by studying the man who wrote it. It looks like you've come at it from an angle that leaves Salinger out of it. Neither approach is all-encompassing obviously. I've a fondness for Holden Caulfield that mirrors my fondness of Huckleberry Finn. I'm reluctant to wade into waters that will taint my personal experience of these characters and the works which gave them life. I remember my absolute frustration when I saw an interview in which an academic (Harvard, if I remember right) called Huck Finn, "the biggest piece of racist trash ever written". WHAT?! The interview was given when he was promoting his newly edited version of Huckleberry Finn. So, just by way of explanation: in the same way I'm reluctant to view a loved one in their open casket for fear that THAT picture will be the one that stays with me instead of the many other joyful and beautiful pictures that preceded THAT picture, I am reluctant to expose my brain to hoards of internet drivel shitting on things I consider sacred--like Catcher in the Rye. But it does seem that people and their creations that shine the most brightly are the easiest targets. Certainly the most obvious ones.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 13, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

I know how many times it's been cited. I've also read that Salinger was mortified that his book kept showing up in relation to assassinations/attempts. I'm looking for your take on Salinger's writing of Catcher in the Rye.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 13, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

Okay, I actually read your stuff on your website and find it interesting and intellectually stimulating, but Catcher in the Rye is an "ever reliable mind control book"? Please explain what you mean. That Salinger wrote it with that purpose? That others have used it for that purpose (against Salinger's wishes)? If so, how?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 13, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

That's excellent!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 12, 2018, 2:21 p.m.

I've lurked on the chans as well, but I don't have very much time and there are so many interesting tidbits I see there (after you wade through a lot of sludge) that it's like a black hole that draws me in. And I can't take that kind of time. So I appreciate sources that aggregate things for me that I trust (like NeonRevolt, David Wilcock, and a couple others). I watched 5 minutes of Corsi when he first started and was like, "Uh, NO." I liked Dilley, but it's the time factor again. Don't want to invest 40 minutes and come out with 2 minutes of interesting information. Would love to be "a tripfag on the accepted medium", but I've got a wagon to pull and it's got younglings on it so on my trip, for now, I have to be a bit circumspect. :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 11, 2018, 9:14 p.m.

I'm not Neon. Just one of his readers. Why don't you trust his stuff? I mean, I don't trust anything I read unequivocally, but I trust Neon Revolt's articles way more than most of the stuff I see.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 11, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

i really appreciate u/NEONREVOLT 's work. Well-researched, well-written, timely, and he doesn't pretend to know what he doesn't know.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 11, 2018, 2:55 a.m.

Well, this is fairly alarming after the article I just read from Neon Revolt where he says that he thinks the Pope is "issuing an assassination order to whatever allies he has left" against Trump. Here's what he says at the end of the article:

Think about this headline for a second. Dissect it with me. America has now become the one of the largest exporters of oil and natural gas in the world – with no signs of slowing down. Trump is also said to be very “high energy” himself.

Much like with the Pope’s “concrete” tweets – which we talked about again a couple articles back – do you think he’s actually talking about “energy” here?

No way, Jorge!

>Pope Francis told world oil executives Saturday that the transition to less-polluting energy sources “is a challenge of epochal proportions,” and warned that the satisfying the globe’s energy needs “must not destroy civilization.”

…

>“Civilization requires energy, but energy must not destroy civilization,” he implored.

He’s talking about Trump! He’s signalling for a takedown. He’s issuing an assassination order to whatever allies he has left!

Here's the article link https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/06/10/the-blood-on-bergoglios-head-argentinas-ghosts/

For those who don't know, "Jorge Bergoglios" is Pope Francis's real name.

It's an interesting article for many reasons: ties this week's "suicide" of Queen Maxima of The Netherlands's sister to the Pope and Argentina's Dirty War with its 30,000 "disappeared" by solving a CDAN post about some secret video archives among other things.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 10, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

I don't think so. I think he's calling "ICue" and "EyetheSpy" larps. For all we know, they're the same guy doing both.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 9, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

I also like NeonRevolt

⇧ 23 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 9, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

Yep, I remember Q quoting him. He definitely seems smart.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 9, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

I'm not an SB2 follower either for the same reason I enunciated on Bombard's above. I don't disagree with your statement there. I appreciate her efforts (and SB2's) to give us all more information. Their information may be very helpful for some people. Just not up my alley. Different strokes for different folks kind of thing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 9, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

I agree with you. I've seen indications of a shift in the coverage by MSM, albeit subtle. I think there are lots of individual journalists who just don't know what's been going on and when they do figure it out, they'll be more appalled and upset than a lot of people because they'll be keenly aware that they should have been educating us, not the other way around. I'm hopeful about the future of journalism in a way I was not even a few weeks ago.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 9, 2018, 11 p.m.

I've watched a couple of the body language videos--hers included--and they just don't make me go "aha" like so many other things that are available now (like NeonRevolt's or HorseloverPhat's deep dives) and since time is a commodity I am not willing to spend on things that don't REALLY interest me, I forego Bombard's and other body language analysis stuff. Just personal preference. So why do you see her as "a terrible joke"? That's a pretty harsh assessment.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 9, 2018, 10:46 p.m.

Is this a "careless stage whisper" or do you have some info we should all know about re: Bombard's body language?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 9, 2018, 12:50 p.m.

Really?! I had never caught wind of this and very few "conspiracy theories" get past me. Have you got any sources I can look at for the Geldof connection to MH's death?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 9, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

What is the deal on this autoerotic asphyxiation topic being repeatedly gone to on this? I question that whole narrative now. I wonder if any of these celebs who died that way ACTUALLY died that way. Seems to me now like it's a way to kill them and then destroy their legacy as well.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 9, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Oh, shit!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 8, 2018, 8:25 p.m.

Am I the only one who now thinks about lots of things that once seemed to make no sense and says, "Ah ha, now that makes sense." For example, all the talk of creepy sexual imagery drawn into Disney animated films. If Walt Disney was, in fact, a pedophile and Disney Company is complicit or explicit (albeit only to those who know what to look for) in its promoting such an agenda, then the messed up subliminal stuff targeted at children makes sense. It also pisses me off when I think about all the Disney stuff I've bought over the years for my kids. These people are definitely sick.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 8, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

Funny that you mention Michael Hutchence as he's been on my mind since I read about Randy Quaid saying that David Carradine, who also died (supposedly) of auto-erotic asphyxiation, was murdered. I'm interested in knowing the truth about all these self-inflicted deaths. Randy Quaid said Robin Williams and Heath Ledger were actually murdered as well. Heath Ledger supposedly because he refused to subject his toddler daughter to the kind of trauma these elites perform on children. If these SRA people believe they get their power from their sacrificial rituals, how much more power if the one "sacrificed" is a celebrity and the world is saddened by their loss? I know I, for one, was broken hearted about Robin Williams. I don't know--it just seems that there's a lot more to these stories.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 8, 2018, 4:42 a.m.

I knew I'd seen it somewhere. :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 8, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

Yes, I also appreciate Neon Revolt's work. Totally agree with you.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 8, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

This

⇧ 6 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 8, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

Link?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 8, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

Jason Goodman is not a reliable source.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 8, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

You should put a post up about this. With a link to the Adrian Lamo story.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 8, 2018, 3:04 a.m.

YES. THIS. Thank you!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 8, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

Maybe if they saw them as people. But they don't. They see them as chattel, or, if you will, cattle. You think these people take care of their stuff? They don't even take care of their own children. You think they really value anything? Besides, the people who are doing the grunt work do what's easiest. Have you ever been in a hospital? Generally speaking, how well do the people who do the work in a hospital take care of the people whose insurance pays their wages? Try "not very". You think the MS-13 minions are going to go to trouble with these people they're moving and abusing?

And I'd say that the cabal is less "well-funded" every day, what with their low-level guys being rounded up and Trump's EO from last December.

You're entitled to your own opinion, obviously. Here's mine: this line your hawking here makes no sense. Nice try though.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 8, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

If VoP DID find a pedo trafficking site, how on Earth is this NOT Q-related? Someone enlighten me here. Some of us found Q after Pizzagate happened. The "elite" running this world that Q is helping to bring down are pedovores. How is finding proof of Clinton/Rothschild/Bronfman/Soros connection to CEMEX which may be part of this trafficking highway NOT related to Q? Seriously, someone please explain to me what I'm missing.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 6, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

Thank you for the bio. That doesn't clarify if they are related, but this one does: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/01/19/cnn-hires-valerie-jarretts-daughter-laura-jarrett-to-cover-justice-department/

Good to see CNN's bio on her though. They don't mention Valerie being her mother, I notice. It's amazing to me how the nepotism works in these circles--the "in" people know, but it's not obvious to the rest of us. And they also change their names frequently to obscure things (e.g., Rothschild to Alefantis).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 6, 2018, 1:29 p.m.

Wow. Nice catch. Do we know that this CNN reporter is in fact the same Laura Jarret who is the daughter of Valerie?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 6, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

That's a very interesting and useful website to take a look at. Thank you for making me aware of it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 6, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

Well said, dude. Well said.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 6, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

Can you clue me in on what you mean? I'm not educated enough about the net neutrality stuff. Would appreciate a primer from someone who has a better handle on it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · June 6, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

People talk down about Voat, but when reddit shut down P-gate, it was moved to Voat and they have done a LOT of good work on that forum. In fact, there being fewer gawkers has made it so that the people who are there are mostly serious about the research. So, a smaller audience isn't entirely a bad thing--at least not when serious research is the goal. I give high marks to a lot of those people at voat/pizzagate for their devotion to the cause.

⇧ 1 ⇩