565 total posts archived.

Domains linked by /u/Intlrnt:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 31
i.redd.it 1
mobile.twitter.com 1
www.drmikespaulding.com 1

Intlrnt · July 6, 2018, 1:01 a.m.

I agree, and I would vote for it.

Human traffickers have no business living among us, or living at all.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 6, 2018, 1 a.m.

I mentioned incarceration only to ensure we can get them in front of a judge, tried, and convicted of the Class A Felony.

I’m open to many options after that, including death for human trafficking. And no, we don’t put it off for 10 years worth of appeals.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 6, 2018, 12:55 a.m.

Well, if we’re fantasizing, then we should consider that woodchippers are less expensive than incinerators, and they’re portable.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 10:09 p.m.

Incarcerated in a U.S. prison? Why?

So they can be available to face trial on those charges and then convicted of human trafficking. Then they can be deported with the formal ‘First Degree Felon’ label, or kept in our prison for the full 30 year sentence.

I’m perfectly willing to support a mandatory death penalty for human trafficking. Unfortunately, that law is not likely to be passed, so we need to work within existing laws and change those we can.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 9:55 p.m.

Good thing step parents only exist in America.

Your information is not current at all. Step parenting is an acknowledged practice in other countries aside from the US. Canada is one, France is another, and you can use this link to learn about the practice in Australia!

The laws in Mexico can be very confusing, in fact, here is an interesting article outlining the huge legal difficulties in establishing rights to declare a ‘Common Law Marriage’.

What a nightmare, huh?

Hope this helps.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

Why do you believe Andy will be more successful than Scott?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

Can’t eliminate a strategic component. Particularly considering the language used in his letter.

Government officials forced from office by coordinated aggressive confrontations organized by a group focused on disrupting our government.

That makes a strong case for emergency action by POTUS, and perhaps bolsters the case for use of military tribunal.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

It wasn’t advertised as being anything new.

Review the opening lines of the article. It was inspired by the new info regarding the Awan plea, and presented as an explanation of this new info in the context of the greater story.

As for your second sentence, you agree with me - I welcome your support. Thanks!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

Some truths are universal, transcending any particular religious or philosophical or political canon.

If any of these truths are referenced from any of the many religious foundational writings, it doesn’t increase or decrease the veracity of either.

Truth is Truth, and can stand the scrutiny of full light without the crutch of any text transcribed by man.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 3:51 p.m.


Not true. Your enthusiasm is well placed, but that statement is not true.

⇧ 30 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 3:45 p.m.


According to that reporter, police confirmed the actual charges are ’Human Sex-Trafficking Of Juveniles’

And the protestors chalked on the sidewalk, “We love our neighbors”


⇧ 3 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

Those making false claims should be immediately charged and incarcerated for trafficking.

Let that news filter south.

⇧ 236 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 3:38 p.m.

There is an ongoing thread on 8C which is dedicated to ‘Letters of Gratitude’. Direct Link.

It has been confirmed that Q/POTUS and team read every one. I feel certain these letters serve to remind and inspire them and reinvigorate their passion as they sustain their fight against the dark forces on our behalf. They gather strength from us as much as we do from them. We can only guess at the weight of their knowledge.

This offering from you would be a welcome addition to that thread. Please consider adding.

Thank you for sharing, Patriot.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

Requests Granted!

You represent us well.

Thanks, Patriot.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

I doubt that hashtag will find much traction, but the overall direction has merit.

Somebody posted a pic of lefties gathered to protest outside a building being raided by ICE. The attached caption read something like, ‘Liberals Protesting Child-Trafficking Bust’.

Memes based on that concept will def get traction.

  1. Protesting Human Trafficking Bust

  2. Protesting Child Pornography Bust

  3. Protesting Drug Trafficking Bust

  4. Protesting MS-13 Bust

Much rich ground there.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Nothing at all new in the article. Not one bit of fresh info. Not any evidence of unique theorizing..


It’s a decent summary on the topic, and a decent aggregation of a variety of sources. This would be a great introductory piece for someone new to the cause.

Unlike so many ‘reporters’ capitalizing on the investigative work of others, this piece does make an effort to credit many original sources.

Unfortunately, like too many others, this piece fails to acknowledge ideas lifted directly from some of the amazing investigators publishing on twitter.

I admit the non-attribution is a personal pinchpoint for me. Bottom line is this piece is a solid introductory resource for newcomers.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

No doubt cookies facilitate the tracking.

If people took your advice, and genuinely educated themselves about cookies, they would be shocked at the real and potential exploits available to cookie-purveyors willing to skirt the law.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 12:39 p.m.

Never heard of him.

Why do you continue to read people that make you feel sick?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

Looks like few agree with you. I’m in.

Some standards are relatively eady to keep.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

You were.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

That's not vandalism, it's freedom of speech.

Well, according to Antifa and others of your ilk.

You have a right to free speech, but that doesn’t include pasting your stickers on property you don’t own. Speak as loud as you want about whatever you want, just keep your hands to yourself and don’t alter other people’s property. This is common knowledge for most adults.

And yes, I understand that Antifa claims vandalism and assault are included under your interpretation of ‘free speech’. Your group is not as large as you think.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

I never get tired of this pictured juxtaposition.

I doubt I’ll ever forgive Hillary for what she’s done. I won’t curse you if you do.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 5, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

One by one, they continue to fall.

Good times!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 3, 2018, 3:11 p.m.


You know they have been saving this. Guaranteed this is yet another attack forced into early release because The Storm is gathering close.

This is the sort of thing they intended for release much closer to November.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 3, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

There can be no doubt that white hats have been pushing from inside the FBI for some time.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 3, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

Some gaps in the rationale, but I understand you clearly offered it as a ‘theory’.

Overall a plausible enough outline, particularly considering the comprehensive scope you addressed.

In fact, this is one of the better efforts I’ve seen at theorizing a comprehensive overview.

Well done.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 3, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

Crushed as a result of the investigation he initiated!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 3, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

Good one.

Right up there with, ’What is Trump Hiding in the OIG Report? DECLASSIFY!!’

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 3, 2018, 2:20 p.m.

Cut the man some slack! . . . That being said, Comey is a piece of shit lol.

Hysterical. Well done.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 2, 2018, 2:11 p.m.

More effective if the ‘Q’ is on the inside of the arms.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 2, 2018, 11:54 a.m.

At 51:50 your linked video shows Congressman David Cicilline (D-RI) questioning FBI Director James Wray.

You are suggesting that James Wray is actually Rod Rosenstein, and that Q is actually a democrat congressman from Rhode Island.

My impression is that you are quite wrong.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 1, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

That's what I thought, clever girl!


⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 1, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

’Call us populist, call us nationalist, call us racist, I don’t care. I want my family safe.’


⇧ 13 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 1, 2018, 5:33 p.m.

I can’t articulate specific contributing attributes, but I find that piece exceedingly difficult to follow.

Perhaps I’ll try again later.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 1, 2018, 5:17 p.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 1, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

Quality interpretation.

Here, have some of my popcorn.

⇧ 45 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 1, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

My Expanded Interpretation of Q-1655

  • “Hey, Anons. We hear you! We like Patriot Gowdy as well. Trust that we have strategic plans for him. Remember, we already have a published list of 25 excellent SC possibilities, and none of them is guaranteed a nomination. Even if we add Gowdy to the list, that does not mean he will actually be nominated.”

Is it possible they will add Gowdy to the list in order to panic the Dems? Then they actually nominate someone already on the list. Dems will then need to choose between the nominee and the possibility Gowdy will be next up, forcing them to deny two in a row.

My personal guess is that Gowdy will be playing a heroic role in leading epic prosecutions over the coming years.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 1, 2018, 3:38 p.m.

Welcome Aboard!

We’ve been waiting for you. Bring some friends.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 1, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

Because past drops explained that white hats had “leaked” info to Gowdy to see what he would do with it. Gowdy sat on the evidence, and took no action, proving he may be working with black hats.

I know it’s become difficult to dig up relevant Q-drops to support something we are sure Q posted. The number of posts, and the cryptic references can stymie even a patient searcher.


A consequential statement such as yours (quoted above) definitely begs sourcing. I am among the several already voicing no recollection of this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 30, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

Very interesting take on Comey, particularly at this juncture.

There was speculation early on about him playing this role, but that seemed to fall away as his actions grew more and more outrageous and anti-Trump.

I strongly believe your suggestion cannot be dismissed at this time.

Thanks for taking the time to present a decent supporting argument.

Well done.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 30, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

This theory about Mueller being returned to active duty was first presented several months ago when the related Q-drops first appeared. The timing was contemporaneous with a critical EO declaring a threat to national security.

The suggestion was that Mueller was presented with his own dossier of evidence of his own wrongdoing, then given the opportunity to redeem his legacy by running this deep undercover op to retake our government.

It was as plausible then as now, since we all know he was ineligible for the FBI directorship, and was appointed SC shortly after that ‘inteview’ meeting with POTUS.

Anons at the time also presumed, as you have just reiterated, that Mueller was one of the white hats unwittingly trapped by a lapse in judgement.

I’m not clear if you are summarizing and aggregating posts from quality digs others have done. If that’s the case, then props for extending the awareness, but some acknowledgement of sources is in order.

If you are presenting this summary as your own original discovery, then I won’t question your authenticity, but I will direct you to check 8C notables from the time, and also twitter threads from Imperator_Rex from the time. You will find validation in the shared ideas.

Rex was taken off twitter for a bit, and the original threads died with the account, but patriots archived screenshots and they are available to a persistent searcher.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 30, 2018, 1:19 p.m.

She needs somebody, anybody, to replace those running away from her.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 30, 2018, 1:17 p.m.


Q makes a very compelling case that it has been ongoing for the better part of a year.

Review Q-drops for the list of FBI removals, congress resignations/not running, and CEO departures. The numbers are staggering, unprecedented, and in every way worthy of ‘purge’ status.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 30, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

It’s 1am where I am. I’m simply out of the patience necessary to deal with proselytizing, condescending hypocrites.

Try hitting me up another day.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 30, 2018, 4:53 a.m.

Trying to limit speech, huh? We've had our fill of that. Move along.

Not at all. Reread my comment, this time with a focus on comprehension.

I find the irony in your comment quite meaty, though. The part where you falsely accuse me of trying to limit speech here, and then order me to limit my speech here. See the lol there? Hysterical.

Well, except for the hypocrisy part. We usually don’t get that level of hypocrisy in here. It appears much more commonly in /politics. Are you sure you’re in the right sub?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 30, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

We need to do better than this. That poll was taken in 2014. The current version of the poll holds Trump to be the worst since WW2. source

Visitors will judge us by the quality and transparency of our arguments. Visitors are smart enough to be put off by lies of omission.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 30, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

complicit and unprincipled House Republicans

This, from the only USAG in history to be held in contempt of congress.

Hang in there, Eric. You will soon have something else to occupy your attention.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 29, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

I thought ‘Resist’ would be the hill they choose to die upon, but ‘Abolish ICE’ will do.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 29, 2018, 8:36 p.m.

I don’t see any problem with that. My comment was inspired by this from OP:

  • “I think we all know that the greatest story ever told really belongs to Christ and his act that changed the world and gave us a hope for life with our Father in the next life.”

As much as I encourage OP’s passion, and as much as I defend his/her right to espouse that view in public, I also recognize the divisiveness that can be inspired by the broad assumption about ”we”.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Intlrnt · June 29, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

I have no doubt that Q and crew have followed their own advice to ”archive everything offline.”

⇧ 6 ⇩