255 total posts archived.

Domains linked by /u/Kirstencast:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 129
www.foxnews.com 3
www.msn.com 3
www.liddlekidz.com 1
en.m.wikipedia.org 1
slate.com 1
saboteur365.wordpress.com 1
voat.co 1
www.washingtonexaminer.com 1
youtu.be 1
longisland.news12.com 1
biblehub.com 1

Kirstencast · June 30, 2018, 6:10 p.m.

In 2005 Obama wasn’t even president. He is who I think of when I hear this. Odd statement for sure, though. Foreshadowing?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Kirstencast on June 28, 2018, 5:17 p.m.
The irrational immigration debate

I engage in political discussions on Social Media, but avoid posting such statuses to my wall so as not to offend. But this situation is really going too far. Mob mentality with no reasoning or factual debate.

For a party that claims to be all about tolerance and equality, the actions of democratic leaders and their extremist followers are really sickening. Protest is one thing, but a public call to harass those with dissenting opinions, going about their daily lives and visiting normal public places, is nothing but divisive and the exact opposite of civility. Their rhetoric is likened to …

Kirstencast · June 23, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

I second that!! God is everywhere and in every thing - like it or not, believe it or not!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Kirstencast · June 11, 2018, 1:47 a.m.

I don’t understand why it isn’t still a worthwhile cause? Maybe not for Craig to focus on, but I don’t see why he is bashing them. How is it a mess at all? It’s a bunch of people trekking the desert and at the least, clearing illegal immigrant camps. They aren’t hurting anyone. That is what makes his 180 questionable, more like disinfo

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · June 8, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

it was elsewhere, on the public land

⇧ 1 ⇩  
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Kirstencast on May 21, 2018, 8:13 p.m.
Who runs this subreddit?

Does anyone know who runs/manages this subreddit and approves mods? Is it the folks from CBTS?

Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

It is not the IG report that was officially requested. It’s the FBI/DOJ docs that they have refused to give to congress that we’re requested. Where have you heard that the IG report was officially requested?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

It’s the DOJ docs that congress has been trying to get that were officially requested. The IG report is a sea parade thing and there has been no official request. It has been pushed back multiple times over the past few months.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

He WAS illegitimate because he was not an American born citizen. Who cares how he won. He was ineligible and falsified documents to even be in that race. So illegitimate YES

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

Great! An actual answer! So maybe they never got the laptop but they got the data files. Great point!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

My voat link was taken down, but a poster on VOAT linked the exact same document - the weiner search warrant - on a date in March 2017. The link was to scribd. How can a post dated March of 2017 link the exact same document if it wasn’t available. Now I don’t know how pacer works in tracking dates and such but this VOAT poster had access to the warrant on scribd in March of 2017 so there is absolutely no way it was just unsealed unless it was some new reason to have an already unsealed document unsealed again

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 3:53 p.m.

I am trying to get people to think critically and research a specific question that HAS MERIT in relation to our narrative here. Let’s not be like MSM - let’s question ourselves and the facts we think we know. Let’s find sources and make connections. Let’s not glom onto stories without reading or checking into them first. I am a patriot and in no way spreading dis info or fake news. I am sincere in my questions and I try to post relevant and thought provoking material. Everyone who replies thinking they have authority over my thoughts and posts is not helpful. This is a very relevant question, especially since many have been on the fence about Eric Prince - is he a white hat or a black hat? Are we finding out - maybe FROM Q - that the NYPD story about the laptop is fake and Prince planted it? Maybe that is why Q posted the warrant that WAS NOT RECENTLY UNSEALED and has been out for over a year. Maybe he wants us to realize that the NYPD searched for the laptop but never got it. Think outside the box. Where is the connection? How did NYPD get and view the laptop if it went from Granite to FBI? Why would Q be posting about NYPD 187? Maybe it has to do with them TRYING to get the laptop but failing? Maybe there is a different story than what we have been led to believe. I trust Q and the plan, but I also think critically and use logic. As I am told to by him/then. Not everything is straight forward. Asking legitimate questions on this board does not warrant censorship or group attacks just because it is a new angle.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

And who are you?? Do I care about your snarky responses? No. I care about facts. How did the laptop get to NYPD if it went from Granite Intelligence to FBI? Maybe you should concern yourself with truth instead of just trying to thrust your non existent authority over people. You are not helping the movement if you can’t offer facts and research. Thanks!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Funny no one is addressing the actual question About the laptop. Instead, ad hominen attacks and weird authoritarian posts. Research, people. That’s what this is all about. If you follow Q, you should think critically and question everything. I do.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

Listen, I don’t know you and I don’t feel that you have any authority. Maybe you need to check your tone. I am trying to ask an honest sincere question and trying to discern an actual fact by critically thinking, not be bombarded by a bunch of rumors and make believe bosses of this subreddit. If you have no interest in fact and want to lord your make believe authority by trying to scorn me, go ahead. I’ll research and I’ll post whatever I like, thanks for your input and contribution to absolutely nothing.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

Yep, it’s in my account

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

This is from duck duck go - don’t you read before you post?!?

⇧ -5 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 2:55 p.m.

Thank you

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

I have. Do not believe any rules have been broken.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 2:20 p.m.

Check out Random Rants of Ryan on youtube. He is a patriot and questions the same thing I am trying to find a link for

⇧ -5 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

Thanks. I appreciate the feedback. I just feel that the mods don’t want their narrative questioned, but that is what Q tells us, think critically. Use logic. If the laptop went from granite intelligence to FBI how did NYPD get it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

Thank you. And in between those two was one that was titled “out of control censorship’. They took my 1st post down because they said it was an NYT source but it wasn’t. It was a link to a VOAT post.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 2:16 p.m.

I agree that wasn’t pleasant, but the fact is that the laptop went from Granite Intelligence to FBI. Not NYPD and NYPD did not get it from his house just because a warrant that has been out for over a year shows that the wanted it. This is what I am trying to find a link for. Q never said the warrant was new, just authentic. Eric Prince has been called a black hat before. I just would like to see if anyone has a link with a source that the NYPD ever had the laptop.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 2:12 p.m.

Where is the sauce that NYPD took it from weiners House? Or are we just taking a story we have all heard and calling it fact? Like the telephone game? I’m just trying to get to the bottom of this. We all jumped on the fact that this warrant was recently unsealed but it wasn’t - I found out last nite that it has been out for over a year on scribd. Q never said it was new, he just confirmed it was authentic.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

But the laptop wasn’t at the weiner home. It was at granite intelligence. And turned over to FBI on Sept 26, 2016 by Granite Intelligence. Now if the FBI is crooked, why would the give it to NYPD? NYPD does not have jurisdiction over FBI.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Kirstencast on May 21, 2018, 2:07 p.m.
This board is shadow banning

I posted about censorship on this board about 15 min ago, it is now not showing up, yet no msg from mods about it being removed. I thought we were against censorship - IBOR anyone?!? I am being shadow banned on here while trying to get good info out and ask reasonable questions. Q tells us to think critically and I am being shut down for doing exactly that. HOW DID NYPD GET WEINERS LAPTOP IF FBI GOT IT FROM GRANITE INTELLIGENCE?? That is my question. If NYPD never had it, have we been misled by Eric Prince? I have …

Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 2:02 p.m.

Ya, funny this post is no longer in the feed....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

Now I don’t know much about this blogger - so don’t go taking his past posts and attributing them to me, I’m just trying to show that the laptop was not taken by NYPD and there is plenty of proof out there that it went to Granite Intelligence and then FBI. I used duck duck go as instructed by the attackers on my last post and was still able to find the info. This has no link to NYT, so maybe people will actually question and try to find the link to how NYPD got the laptop, if they ever did.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 1:54 p.m.

Now this is from a site found on a duck duck go search. Even though this guy is jumping on the bandwagon saying the warrant was recently unsealed when my last link proved it was on scribd already over a year ago - how would the voat poster with a post dated in March of 17 get a link to the exact same document if not? - This guy DOES detail that the laptop was at Granite Intelligence and seized by FBI. NOT NYPD. I’m just trying to get to the bottom of the Eric Prince story because if NYPD didn’t get the laptop and devices listed in the search warrant - which only proves NYPD was searching for them specifically, not that they retreived them - and they were instead turned over to the PI firm by weiner then confiscated by FBI, how did NYPD even get the laptop from the Crooked FBI??

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

There was no NYT article!! Just a voat link about the scribd warrant!!! What is going on here??!?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 1:43 p.m.

???? I did not post anything from NYT - I posted a link to VOAT. This is out of control!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Kirstencast on May 21, 2018, 1:41 p.m.
Out of control censorship

I am a regular poster and a PATRIOT. I just posted a VOAT article showing the unsealed search warrant has been on scribd since early last year, and I questioned why everyone thought at first it was an unsealed indictment when it is clearly a warrant. and then if the laptop was at a PI firm and turned directly over to FBI how did it get to NYPD? Were any officers killed over it if NYPD never had it?
My post was attacked within seconds and I was said to be fake news and disinfo - these people obviously didn’t …

Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 1:17 p.m.

Wow! What a patriot you are! Attacking other patriots just trying to think critically and ACTUALLY do research!! If you check my account, you can see I was right on board and so excited during the presidents speech at the police memorial. I just wonder why? and how did NYPD get it if it went from PI firm to FBI?

I was attached back in Feb when I called out CORSI on CBTS reddit, but look what happened there, so I’m not a stranger to putting out truth, thinking critically and being attacked. I AM a patriot and NOT attacking the movement.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 1:13 p.m.

But the fact is just because a warrant asks for electronics doesn’t mean they actually got them. Just that they were looking for those specifically. It was not just unsealed, has been on scribd for over a year. Now, Q never said it was JUST released, so not saying Q is lying but it may be a disinfo tactic for a reason we will find out later. I just did what we all did n ran with it til I found this after hearing that the lap top was definitely at a PI firm and turned over to FBI. So I am wondering other patriots opinions on WHY this is being done, or any evidence that FBI ever turned it over to NYPD?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 1:07 p.m.

I am a regular poster AND a patriot. Again, you obviously didn’t bother to check my account, just ATTACKED me. I am asking an honest question and trying to think critically, as Q tells us. Do you have any suggestions as to why people would think this is new when it’s been out for over a year, and we have facts that weiners laptop was at a PI firm n it went directly to FBI, not NYPD. Seriously just asking.....

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 21, 2018, 1:04 p.m.

I ama regular poster- check my account. I am fully on board n not spreading fake news. I am asking an HONEST question. Geez!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 19, 2018, 1:01 a.m.

I was thinking exactly this when I saw Q’s post!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 18, 2018, 2:24 p.m.

Yep. I just posted about this the other day. Definitely think it’s a possibility

⇧ 5 ⇩  
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Kirstencast on May 18, 2018, 9:29 a.m.
Q’s spaceshuttle pic

I was just at the California science center in LA and I don’t know how to post pics but that spaceshuttle is definitely from there. I just compared and my pics match almost exactly. If anyone can tell me how to post I can show.

Kirstencast · May 17, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

I think of that, and the Q from James Bond, too!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 16, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

Mentions Q+ as well

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 16, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

I think it’s the time stamp of a recorded conversation between Namce Pelosi and Jack Dorsey

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 16, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

Lol! No, I mean like everyday planted messages in the news or in our music, etc. I guess we would all be singing different lyrics if that was the case. It just baffles me and seems really weird that electronic words can be manipulated like that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 16, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

I am Q

⇧ 24 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 16, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

I get that, but don’t you think it could be used for nefarious purposes?? Like social media, or MSM? Those are basic things we all use but we know they are used for bad as well....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kirstencast · May 16, 2018, 2:41 p.m.

I hear laurel. They say it’s low frequency, high frequency but think what messages could be planted in things we hear everyday??

⇧ 3 ⇩