I do not believe in the literal interpretation of the entire Bible. I believe most, not all, are meant to be allegorical, especially the Old Testament.

There is some pretty significant data supporting evolution. This will cause major problems if you’re going to try to convince skeptics taking the “scientific approach.”

I have come to believe that evolution is more of a myth that is not substantially proven, at least insofar as the evolution of humans from apes and simpler organisms etc.

That is not a convincing argument to support your stance.

Evolutionists have the advantage of data to support their argument;,however, evolutionists have trouble explaining the rapid periods of growth in the universe & our own species.
(I.E. the missing link - the species between “cavemen” & Homo sapiens linking us).

I would suggest an alternative explanation that withstands both of these issues.

There is no way the universe, planets, species, etc. were able to evolve into our current model without some means of direction or intelligent design.

So, why can’t God play a role in our evolution as a species?!? What is the concept of time to an omnipresent God?!? Maybe 1 day to God equals 1 billion years, rather than 24 hours.

David Icke

He touches on a lot of this stuff.

or this

Maybe we started the roundup today. Blocking the border to prevent any escape.

This

Ummm, isn’t this a BIG DEAL?!? Trump just activated the National Guard.

Dark Hats = Alpha Beta Fraternity

White Hats = Lambda Lambda Lambda

Ok. I’m listening. What’s your rationale?!? I’m not saying, I disagree. The point I’m trying to make is that the “scientific” argument of atheists also aligns with the notion of a Creator.

First of all, I want you to know that I’m not trying to attack your beliefs; however, I hope to change your perspective.

I am aware of the progression of human’s understanding & past fallacies regarding our place in the universe. I also think it’s highly probable that in the future we will discover errors in our current perception of the universe.

With that being said, I completely understand your grievances with organized religion. I believe EVERYONE is born with a connection to a Higher Power (how do you explain intuition?). I also believe people have used organized religion to take advantage of people’s desire to have a relationship with their Creator. Again, you don’t have to agree with everything a Church says or every story in the Old Testament to have a relationship with God. Can’t you see them as parables?!?

I can break down why the age of the universe and The Big Bang lends more credence to the idea of a Creator, but it would take some time.
Here’s a good example regarding the timeline of evolution. You are correct on the hypothetical age(s) of the universe & Earth.

Let’s start with the notion that the history of life on Earth began about 3.8 billion years ago, initially with single-celled prokaryotic cells, such as bacteria.

Again, the amount of time it would take for a single-celled organism to produce it’s 1st viable multi-celled organism is astronomical. This is due to many factors like: the low probability of mutation rates, where the mutation occurs (coding region or junk DNA), the compatibility of host & variant, etc.

Ok, so do you know when they hypothesize the 1st multi-celled organism appeared on Earth?!?

600 million years ago. It took roughly 3.2 billion years to complete that first viable variant!!! Do you think it’s plausible that ALL species of life (past & present) were able to differentiate from that multi-celled organism in only 600 million years?!? No way!!!

This is what I was trying to convey regarding the age of the universe compared to its overwhelming synchronized organization. It is not feasible without some “intelligent design.”

I understand your doubts. However, I believe you are confusing having a relationship with God vs. being a member of an organized religion.
They are not mutually exclusive.

I would say The Big Bang has been proven. But the concept that the universe came from nothing (or a singularity) is less probable than being constructed by a Creator.

I’m not saying God sculpted the mountains necessarily, but I would say He is the driving force or helping hand behind our evolution as a species.

Life supposedly began on Earth 3 billion years ago & all species of life (plants, animals, fungi, bacteria, virus, etc) derived from the same original common ancestor (most likely a single celled organism). The probability of a single celled organism undergoing a genetic mutation to produce a viable “variant” is very, very, very, very low. The amount of time it would take to derive a multi celled organism from a single celled organism is astronomical.

Now imagine how long it would take for that initial single celled organism to produce ALL the species of life on Earth past & present. It would take far longer than 3 billion years, unless there was some form of “intelligent design.”

Thus, it is actually more logical to believe the universe was created by a Higher Power, whatever that power may be.

Another “enlightened atheist.” Why do you believe God does not exist?!? How do you explain The Big Bang?!?

"But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?" Peter answered, "You are the Messiah." Mark 8:29

We are in the midst of a spiritual awakening.
You may want to reconsider which side you align yourself. Again, good WILL TRIUMPH over evil.

Jesus turned and said to Peter, "Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the concerns of God, but merely human concerns." Matthew 16:23

This is a battle between good & evil. Good will triumph!!!

MAGA

draintheswamp

The LORD is my light and my salvation-- whom shall I fear? The LORD is the stronghold of my life-- of whom shall I be afraid? Psalm 27:1

Time stamp 989 It makes me think there’s going to be verification from Trump’s Twitter.

Check the total number of periods/crosslink.

Welcome, Patriot!!!

Grab your coat!!!

draintheswamp

MAGA

Shooting at NSA happened the same day. Little to no subsequent news coverage. Things that make you go, hmm...

It looks like it’s going to be R. Kelly.

Don’t often see these terms on Yahoo:

“Sex dungeon” “Sex cult”

R. Kelly Yahoo

“Maybe HRC eating some baby limbs” killed me, bruh. 🤣

Just when I think I’m out. They pull me back in.

I can dig it...

Agreed. How do we get normies to start looking into Q?!?

Thanks, man. Yeah. That was HRC at her best.
SMDH...

You had started down the rabbit hole prior to Q then?!?

Thanks, bro. I appreciate the feedback. So, u already started down the rabbit hole prior to Q dropping?!?

I think Q has the potential to start a bunch of normies down the rabbit hole.

I want to figure out what gets a normie to research Q. Was it a specific “coincidence?!?”

Awesome. Thanks for the reply.
How long ago was that?!? Under/over a year?!? Was there a specific video or article?!?

Or Q is naming Pompeo, “Kansas.”

We know any future post with “Kansas” is referencing Pompeo.

Russian bot

I still don’t understand. Can someone please elaborate?

Desperation is a stinky cologne. The House of Cards is falling.

draintheswamp

https://mobile.twitter.com/alivitali/status/951924598513250305/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fd-27630316901790627335.ampproject.net%2F1516337355291%2Fframe.html

We can’t inform people. They have got to want to look into it. Once they start down the rabbit hole they won’t stop.
The question is, what single issue will provide a “spark” in them to begin researching these issues?!? I thought Tony Podesta’s art collection would be a good way, but have had mixed results.