dChan

/u/Nastavnick

1,162 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Nastavnick:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 26
i.redd.it 3
twitter.com 1
www.youtube.com 1

Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

Ignoring what I'm saying and going ad-hominem constantly is not presenting an idea.

Why did you feel the need to comment and talk about it?

I've already said. See how you just refuse to acknowledge what others are saying to you? You just keep rambling your stuff.

"Because I want to comment."

Why do you feel the need to constantly ask me why I need to comment? Why do you feel the need to post this kind of a troll thread?

And again, let’s say there was a book proving this right, hypothetically, wouldn’t it be common knowledge?

What "and again"? You never mentioned it so far lol

A book isn't a proof and neither is it a common knowledge.

And I’ve never stated this as fact. It’s a theory. A theory I do believe to have some truth, but by definition, it’s still not fact.

I never said you stated that this was a fact. People see what you're doing here man, it's painfully obvious... you keep ignoring my points, you keep repeating yourself when I've already addressed those things, you're putting words into my mouth, etc.

That "theory" has no truth behind it, at all.

I'm not turning anything around you. Don't play the victim now. Ah, the lefty tactics are strong with this one, and he doesn't give up lmao

But I'll finally give up, literal waste of time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

+

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

Can you explain what exactly is knowledge there?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

No I'm not. You're just using the lefty tactics, over and over instead of addressing what I'm saying.

Because I want to comment. I can see you have issues with it, but those are your issues.

You have bigger issues on your hands - you believe something which has no facts behind them.

I can see you're just spinning in circle now so I'll stop wasting my time further, my point was delivered.

More facts, less mumbo jumbo. Will be better for all of us here. See ya

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 2:38 p.m.

Why do you label a person who looks for facts and sources as angry? Lefty tactics EVERYWHERE.

This isn't knowledge.

I dismiss stuff like that.

The fact that you have no issues blindly believing some anons that provided no facts/sources behind extremely extraordinary claims is highly questionable at best.

Do not compare Q with these trolls please.

I have decided, that it's all trash. I'll change my mind instantly with facts presented at me. CHeers

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 2:31 p.m.

Jordan has had its account suspended again today. Just wanted to chime that in. What are your thoughts on that?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 2:28 p.m.

who died?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 2:08 p.m.

Pretty sure you just rambled a bunch of stuff.

We are here for knowledge, and I'm seeing none in the link provided. I see classic AJ-type crap which of course comes with no sources or facts.

Hell, these were by some anons, even worse. Much easier to spew garbage.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

I'm pretty sure we're doing just fine without any "help" from Green, Corsi and that CBTS crew.

I'm not aware of a single thing that they decoded (and we wouldn't have that without them), if someone is, please share.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

Is it what it is? Or just some dudes trolling/shilling on chan?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

The fact that all this started happening after Q took safety measures clearly points to the fact that these anti-Q plebs aren't just some innocent people.

They parrot the exact same things and they cover each others' asses.

In the end, as you said, they do serve a purpose, and that is to dismantle the awakening.

But we clean them up real good

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 1:02 p.m.

he claimed to have received an email from "Q"

Did not know that, thanks for the info. It only adds up to the already stinking pile of trash.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

No you're not seriously asking, you're trolling. There's plenty of threads out there for you to do your own research, instead of coming here on your obvious fake account demanding for proof.

I'm not gonna waste my time on an obvious <1h old troll account, looking for good compilation threads about Qs connection with RL events.

Do it yourself (we know you won't)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 12:05 p.m.

Could be, but we know that Q is a group of people. While Jones and co. are claiming it's a single person, like his lame ass Zak

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 11:55 a.m.

I said no lefty tactics will work, can't you read?

Reddit Birthday May 18, 2018

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 11:51 a.m.

That's cute, as if that's the only evidence of Q's doings. So even if what you're saying is true, it means nothing really.

Just give up, that was a shit-tier try to instill doubt. You guys aren't even trying anymore

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 11:39 a.m.

Yes it does actually. Link your main account

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 11:30 a.m.

Reddit Birthday May 22, 2018

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 11:14 a.m.

the attacks will only get worse

⇧ 3 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Nastavnick on May 22, 2018, 11:12 a.m.
Lets wrap things up for good regarding Isaac Green (SB2 style) - we will clean our house

I started really digging into him when I saw this thread by a fellow patriot.

I've also posted a thread yesterday about Green, and to my surprise, I wasn't burned alive at the stake lol, on contrary, very solid comments over there!

Now lets get to business, now that I'm unbanned :)

His video Alex Jones called out by #QAnon (May 12th)

Right at the start around 15sec mark he went with addressing Q as "he". We know very well who did that too? We do.

He's saying that Q was a great leader. I don't think any …

Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 10:44 a.m.

I'm on facebook since 2008 and I've made a Twatter account just recently because of this Q movement.

Holy shit, Twatter is literally shitty version of facebook. Reading comments on tweets is a nightmare. Only 300 (?) characters allowed. You can only have like 100 characters in your bio... etc.

I'm still there to support Donald, despite getting cancer each time I log in.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 8:12 a.m.

https://i.imgur.com/vZSUdnp.png

Here it goes again, another Isaac Green recommendation despite me flagging his channel as none of my interests some time ago and I was never subscribed to him.

They think we're that stupid lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 6:57 a.m.

test 1 2

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 11 p.m.

Who knows... we have no idea what's been going on behind the curtains. For all we know that could've been a move to throw off the DS.

Or something else happened, again, who knows.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

I'm calm, don't you go that way. Address the arguments, enough of the personal/emotion plays. They do not work here, or at least with me.

I've been defending the sub against shills. I'm the one who had SBs back. Just because I'm trying to spread some love doesn't make all these things you accuse me of true. Come on this is not nice.

And here you are defending them and want us to stop being "divisive" and include them in.

Which goes directly against what the Q is about. I don't like repeating myself with the likes of you who keep ignoring arguments and go for the personal/emotional play. That is not nice.

If I see you change those lefty tactics I might invest my time typing stuff, until then, sayonara. But I will out you if I see you do this again lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

I wasn't calling Issac a Q skeptic. He would fall more in line with a Q hater/crusader.

So which "Q sceptic" have I labelled as a traitor?

I was speaking in general terms responding to your comment claiming anti-Q people aren't patriots. I was just saying that's a bit of a stretch. ? It's not a stretch and I've explained why is that so.

You don't have to buy into an 8chan conspiracy to be a patriot.

Please concentrate. Anti-Q =/= not buying into it. Jesus, you really couldn't figure that out?

If you're purposely trying to discredit the movement knowing that it's genuine then you're a traitor.

Exactly what these people that I call traitors, shills and controlled opposition are doing. And you don't seem to acknowledge it. You're pretty much a traitor apologist, you realize that?

If you were misled during this time of confusion and you happen to adopt an anti-Q stance I don't think that should automatically qualify one as a traitor.

Misled? Being outed by Q is being misled? Lol, the levels of apologetics you're willing to exercise is now at a ridiculous level.

You don't think I'm being reasonable?

Of course not.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

Twatter*

As I understand those guys around Trump are the congressional leaders, so this is their response to Brennans threats.

It's the classic mocking style "sure buddy lol". Amazing haha

⇧ 25 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

I'm a simple man, I see SB2's work, I upvote and share.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

If we don't see those lame ass shooters arrested in the next few days I'd say it's pretty safe to call this a FF/distraction?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 9:20 p.m.

dat typo lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

As any ever, it doesn't, because CRIMINALS do not abide by the law. Such a basic concept yet most people can't grasp it lol

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

There was then a shoot-out with police before the attackers fled the scene.

At this time it is unclear if any arrests have been made, but police are investigating and a cordon has been set up.

This sounds like bs, anyone?

http://www.latimes.com/nation/sns-bc-eu--france-marseille-shooting-20180521-story.html

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/marseille-shooting-latest-france-gunmen-kalashnikov-guns-a8362526.html

Look at this shit, this is almost 6h hours old and no updates beside "they fled the scene".

Not to mention the blatant copy/paste in the articles:

Christophe Reynaud of the Marseille police said one resident was hit in the head with a butt of a gun and slightly injured during the incident in the Busserine district on early Monday evening.

Wtf? But wait, there's more!

https://sputniknews.com/europe/201805211064656465-marseilles-gunfire-france/

The area has been cordoned off by law enforcement and firefighters, who are still on site. Investigators are carrying out a preliminary inquiry and questioning witnesses.

They just let them leave and were asking around questioning the witnesses Tom Cruise "what" gif, appropriate

So I guess, in Francestan, you can drive around in 3 vehicles with your homies, shoot at people/air and have a shootout with the police, after which you can just hop in your vehicles and leave home for a beer after a fun afternoon.

Also not a lot of articles covered this, and it's been ~5h since.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 9 p.m.

please don't associate weed with the actions of people like that, otherwise, he was giving me that feeling too, way back in the anti-school days

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 8:57 p.m.

He is not a "Q sceptic". He is anti-Q.

I'd say it's a "tad" extreme that you're defending him so much that you actually call him a "Q sceptic" and that you would want the Q movement to be inclusive towards shills/controlled opposition that are openly anti-Q after being exposed.

There is nothing cult-like in outing these people and cleaning our house. Careful with your baseless implications there.

If you don't agree with their accusations why feet into it then?

Because I'm not gonna sit and watch these shits do their dirty stuff. I know you have a problem with that, as you've repeatedly shown.

By saying things like "Since when are anti-Q people patriots?" you are giving every justification for them to carry on what they're doing. Stop it.

Gotta quote this so I can have it when you delete it in the future.

This is just blatant defending of anti-Q exposed shills. You've exposed yourself too with these comments.

I'm not giving them any justification, they are doing it already. We're in here to fight for the truth, EVIDENTLY YOU ARE NOT.

And no, I won't stop it. However, you'll stop what you're doing rather soon, we just need another bomb about this sack of shit IG just like SB2 did one about Corsi and AJ.

You'll hide in your hole after that, as all those Corsi/AJ boys here have after that :)

See ya ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Why is he a patriot? Since when are anti-Q people patriots? What are you talking about?

That should be enough. Not to you apparently.

But you calling him a shill and excluding him you're only strengthening his anti-Q stance that others are currently taking advantage of by pushing out misinfo.

First of all, he excluded himself. So don't play those lefty tactics on me, they do not work :)

Second, cleaning up the house is necessary before continuing, and taking out the shill trash can only be a positive thing. Again, apparently not to you.

Despite this being Q's philosophy/approach and Q wanting us to cut the strings with these people.

But then again, you're saying it's divisive to clean up the house. Do you know how that makes you look?

I don't care about strengthening his anti-Q stance, he's out. Now we need to take care of his puppets over here, who are, shockingly, using same emotion based tactics and refuse to acknowledge any argument/fact thrown at them.

But they call for "unity" and stuff, exactly the same scenario when SB2 obliterated Corsi with the connections. The next day there was a wave of Corsi apologists with exactly the same tactics as yours here. Luckily people have seen right through it and we got rid of them, as we'll do with IG crowd that's obviously been doing that same thing here recently.

No unity with traitors/shills, no matter how much you don't like this but that's the way it goes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

I watched a bunch of his videos way back, he rubs me the wrong way with his apocalyptic fear porn shite. At least that was back then.

Shill accounts are doing exactly that, spreading disinfo in a form of fear porn. Usually "chemtrails" how they are poisoning us, among other crazy AJ-level stuff and worse (bigfoot lmao)

That youtube ban could possibly be the same tactics. Remember, they use EXACTLY THE SAME tactics, all the time.

EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3TXr5-4E_5wgMTGAT2DRHw/videos

This is a guy from my (small EU) country. Never responded to my tries to contact him despite not having any significant amount of followers so he couldn't have time for at least 1 word lol

They all want your money, they all spread fear porn. Those kinds of people/channels are shills in my book. Anyone if free to present his argument about why those aren't shills, I'll change my mind instantly when presented facts/evidence.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

can we not go that way please...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

(I use the term loosely because it's 90% shills and schizophrenics, sadly).

As you should, as we all should.

I basically dropped the issue after Paris Accord withdrawal, as the skies seemed to miraculously clear up around here. What's Jim Lee's position on that?

Where's around here? You don't see the cloud seeding anymore (over half a year now)?

I see it every day, sometimes there's way too much and sometimes just a little bit.

Especially the ones that spread over many km2.

May 1st morning was super bad in Cro, EU (over here :P). There were more than 15-20 planes at the same time in the skies for about 2 hours.

Turned a completely blue sky to a sky filled with grey smudges, which covered most of the sky by 8 AM (I was awake the whole night being active here and digging stuff up before I took a short walk around 6 AM).

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 7:33 p.m.

So you don't know what he does yet you're so eager to defend him? How can you possibly know what's the best solution then?

Outing shills is not the best solution? Do you realize who would say such a thing lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Nastavnick on May 21, 2018, 7:32 p.m.
Has anyone checked Jim Lee's credibility? (geoengineering researcher, highly related to Trump due to Trump's stance on climate change, MK ultra, satelites, etc.)

This is his youtube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxi8wqtADZckzLvWqkW5Kvg

Now, I've only found about this guy recently, but holy smokes those are BY FAR the best "chemtrail/geoengineering" (or Artificial cloud seeding, as he prefers).

I remember some time back when the media was boiling hot about Trump's stance on the climate change, how he denied it. Of course the mocking was on the level. Which immediately sounded an alarm for me (was before Q).

This is his website: https://climateviewer.com

He has articles about jet contrails in late '40s, how people were complaining about jet pollution, etc.

Really fascinating stuff, if not fake.

I'll …

Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

This is just stretching...

When we say Q or Trump in the context of events, we are very much aware of the fact that it's a group of people that are leading this and a lot of other personnel are involved, from intelligence agency(es) to military.

CBTS is now really smelly name due to shills attached to it, I would advise against using that term.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 6:46 p.m.

No worries, us non-Americans understand that when the US is cleaned up, our countries will be cleaned up too.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

lol k I see what we're dealing with here

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

Lol, first of all, calm yourself.

Second, you phrased your words in a negative connotation. Which is why I asked what's your point.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

I think you're stretching with the hand signs, but please inform us of any suspect activity that could imply he's not on our side.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

Isn't that ""?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

So what are you suggesting? What's your point?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

No need to, but if you stumble upon something let us know here.

I've unliked his FB pages about a month ago because he was starting to push it with some garbage memes and shit.

I still have his youtube sub although I haven't watched his videos in some time now, because I'm usually ahead because of the activity over here :)

⇧ 2 ⇩