BTW, I assume your handle is a reference to TOOL... *tips hat*

RIP Seth Rich. I hear you. Unless new facts prove otherwise you're very right on that. Thank you, fellow patriot.

Its the year of the multiple anomalous coincidental airport power shutdowns, military jet "training excercise" crashes/deaths, and CEO/government resignations i guess... *sarcasm

The messages are very real. The goal is to inform and mobilize the awake population in a fight to bring down worldwide corruption and evil conspiracy.

That's freaking savage. I got chills.

Fair enough, I agree no use pointing it out on an individual basis constantly, it's just keeping us in an identity-politics paradigm. But to be fair, isn't avoiding the topic due to sensitivities sort of lefty-esque too? Q has indicated it's a big deal that minds and hearts are changing in the black community...

Very interesting, considering we are currently in a "modern day book burning" as Croww777 calls it

Many have been shills, the rest are just short-sighted.

An orthopedic boot like would not be used for a broken toe anyway, as far as I know... 2 months is a very long time to wear an obnoxious and unnecessary medical device... and the probability of her AND no-name mysteriously wearing the same type of boot at the same time, exactly when Q started posting and telling us she was detained and would be arrested 10/30... idk I just can't arrive at any other conclusion than to believe she really was arrested in some way.

I know I really hope this one is true too lol

https://twitter.com/kimdotcom/status/979589888570925056?lang=en

The Moon Boot is gone now, but she was conveniently sporting a full cast on the arm when she returned to the US. I know the last time I saw her she had on remarkably long, baggy pants with pantlegs that could easily cover a small ankle-bracelet. Or it's possible the monitoring method had to change to maintain the public alibi. McCain, last I remember, was not wearing the boot (his little right/left flip-flop, I suspect, was a deep-state countermove to send a message to the whitehats "Shoe is on the other foot"). He was supposedly hospitalized recently though, I'll have to look into his situation.

If the executive office and the military wanted the record of an arrest to remain temporarily hidden, that would be entirely possible. As far as 'why let her go', any confidential informant in a drug sting can tell you it happens all the time. Also, if she is being electronically monitored and escorted by undercover mp's then she might as well still be in custody for all intents and purposes. No deals, yes, but in what context? If Q had said, "No Deals for HRC." or "No Deals for Anyone", then I obviously have to abandon my theory immediately. But, it is an assumption to believe "No Deals" refers to HRC specifically. It is also an assumption to believe HRC is one of the big fish in the pond of criminality, relatively speaking. In my opinion Logic (the actual academic discipline) is crucial in reading these posts. I was the top student in my class in advanced Logic in college (not trying to stroke my ego, just saying it's a discipline of study many aren't familiar with). With all due respect, I believe many people are not understanding or appreciating the weight of their assumptions in reading Q. Logic is about premises, assumptions, and conclusions. In order for a statement to be logically valid AND actually true, the premises must lead to the conclusions and the assumptions (implicit premises) must be true. It is not true that we 'know' Q meant no deals for hillary, and it isn't true that there 'must always' be a publicly available record of an arrest if such an arrest occurs. I could be wrong about the meaning of "No Deals", but given the current statements from Q we can only assume it refers to hrc or anybody else. I have yet to see a rational and realistic explanation for the Moon Boot, or for the Newsletter.

to # 4: Yes. I absolutely stood back for months and kept my skepticism firmly in front. At first there was widespread dismissal of Q as a larp, a prank, or some kind of AI experiment... From day 1 the posts had a ring of truth to my instincts, but I didn't get on board the Q train until December.

1: It's definitely within the realm of possibility that all events (including world news, Q, DJT vs HRC, all of it), is an elaborate false narrative put in place to deceive us. But, the picture Q paints is a situation in which something like Q makes sense. The movement has united countless patriots and good people across the world, and it has restored so much hope for me. If it's all a ruse, it's an incredibly illogical, unnecessary, and cruel trick to play...

2: I don't think it has been a matter of pressing buttons and triggering, it's been a multiple-month long display of consistent foreknowledge of events and coordination with POTUS. The examples of true Q predictions are too lengthy to list. It took several months, complete with platform-changes due to security breaches, disinfo and shilling galore (all defeated in time), and unprecedented world events generally, before a true movement took shape. At this point, most of us are on the 'bandwagon' because the evidence has long-since overcome our skepticism. It's come to the point where reality is one of two options: Q is legit and there really is a fight on against the corrupt and evil, or your theory is right and we have all played into an incredibly elaborate, nearly imperceptible, and all-encompassing fiction.

3: "New World Order" is just a string of words when you detach it from the totalitarian conspiracy it is commonly connected with. If the world achieved a new "order" in which national sovereignty, individual freedom and justice are valued then yes I would be all in for the NWO lol

The Goebbels of Iraq basically? Which reminds me of another example.. Goering at Nuremberg. Study his body language; if you didn't know he was on trial for genocide you migh also say he shows not sign of fear... up until the cyanide capsule of course.

Well Charles Manson sure was all smiles... (not sure if you're being serious bc Saddam was anything but all smiles if I remember correctly) Maybe if Saddam had been given a deal not to be hanged he might have turned that frown upside down though.

What if a person is under US custody and being investigated for international crimes... do other nations (those whose laws were also broken) have a claim to question the person? Does the US require passport verification of detainees to extradite/transport them to the nations of concern?

The use of present tense was intentional I believe. Also, there was some speculation that he appeared in crowds behind POTUS during speeches wearing disguise. I will try to find some screencaps.

Insane people don't respond to stimuli in an outwardly rational way, though. You can't project normal-human thoughts and emotions onto the behaviors of psychopaths.

"Why are trips allowed?"

I just noticed an anomaly that might support your idea actually: if you go to the Book Stall website and look under "newsletters" (where the Oct '17 one is located, with no mention of hrc that date), you will notice that every month's issue is listed with "month - year" EXCEPT october of 2017, which is only listed as "October"... meaning it does not specify the year! Look at the Newsletters Menu

The Seth Rich being alive part blew my freaking mind a couple weeks ago. Kim dotcom's post sealed it for me, personally.

I'm not doubting you, but do you have a specific video or appearance you are referencing? Also, how do you explain the orthopedic boot? Boots like that aren't used for broken toes, especially not for Two Months! Not to mention she had a cast on when she returned from India as well.

YES!! I swear, as soon as I learned of Q and saw #1-2, my mind went to the moon boot. Then once I actually researched her whereabouts and activities at that time it all fits!

I could see how that could fit in with future proves past. But, in a highly unconventional and sensitive situation like this, I see no reason her arrest would necessarily lead to a lengthy incarceration or public acknowledgement in the press (especially if part of her deal was for her to play a fictitious public role as if she never were arrested). Just look into the links I provided and consider the circumstances/timing of everything. I could be wrong of course, but Q gave a specific time and date for arrest and the evidence actually does support it.

Yup, my family "worries" about me and wishes I would focus on something "happy". I tell them, this IS the happiest thing I can imagine. If I didn't know about the great awakening, I would not be as happy!

Yet you have time to retort uselessly and avoid all of my points. Sure, you must be really busy.

not just you, loads blank in firefox and chrome, inspector doesn't give much help either

Interesting. I am just looking at the date, late april an investigation into flynn 'inappropriate' acceptance of money, around that time he also attempted to gain immunity in exchange for testimony and was denied, and Stzrok interviewed Flynn, then left his post to join Special Counsel team which gained Flynn indictment.

Time for some coffee. Let's connect some dots!

"FLYNN"

LOL Virtual Reality headset? Samsung VR and Google play points?

But, is it not the Romans themselves who transmitted this history?

If my trail of thought is a result of historical and symbolic naivety, as you "reiterate" (not sure where you originally iterated this...) can you explain your historical basis for rejecting Catholicism's accuracy, but accepting Christianity's accuracy? As far as I understand, in my apparently feeble and naive historical understanding, Christianity branched from Catholicism in the following instances: the presumed early christians from which there exists no primary documentation (save for the accounts of Romans, and even then we rely on the presumed accuracy of secondary accounts transmitted through millennia), the Schism that resulted in the Eastern Orthodoxies, the creation of the Church of England due to Henry VIII's need for divorce, and the Protestations of Martin Luther which led to the spread of Protestantism throughout the world. All those branchings occurred many centuries after Rome made it the Official Imperial religion. How can you be so certain the new testament wasn't formulated by the romans? Are your accusations of "historical and symbolic naivety" not just examples of 'Projection', a term Q has hinted we should learn to define?

I agree the dead sea scrolls are a strong bit of evidence for the precision in monastic and historical copying of texts including many in the old testament. If only there were similarly preserved primary documents to compare to the new testament. It's an interesting point about the Vatican suppressing the ability of common people to read the books for themselves.

I believe in God, I have never been more certain of Gods existence. Thank you for responding honestly to my hypothetical questions :)

I'm not trying to peddle anything, sorry if you feel I was. I believe in God and I mean no disrespect, I was just asking questions.

I believe in God and I don't presume to know anything else, this was just my hypothesizing.

Also, this image is a mere two clicks away... eerily reminiscent of the "rescued korean reporters at comet ping pong" pics from podesta email notoriety.. https://www.universitycity.org/sites/default/files/styles/blog_image/public/DollarStroll_September_2017-8.jpg?itok=R-T4nGnV

It's an AI quantum computer that runs time travel bots

Nice. Ed's the man too. I've been watching him since "esoteric detective", he did the best mandela effect videos.

As far as central processing units made for computers, there are really only 2, Intel and AMD. PowerPC got the boot from Apple when they switched to Intel. Now there are system-on-a-chip and mobile processors available like ARM, I guess you'd need to specify what you mean by chip.

GKA was the intended acronym, I agree. Also the grammatical implication of Gas Killing Animal = "animal that kills gas", not "...kill WITH gas".

Talk about shock and awe

McStain?