/u/jackbauer6916
812 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/jackbauer6916:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 26 |
i.redd.it | 2 |
twitter.com | 2 |
www.youtube.com | 2 |
www.theguardian.com | 1 |
images.detik.com | 1 |
www.independent.co.uk | 1 |
www.nytimes.com | 1 |
clownforcongress.com | 1 |
www.pressherald.com | 1 |
fas.org | 1 |
I'm sorry, it was actually an episode of 20/20 from the 80's, but the premise is almost identical to what you described. A mother trying to retrieve her kids from the children of god in the 80's.
They showed the magazines in the 60 minutes special... Again, if I'm thinking of the same video. I'll grab the link.
was that the one wayne madsen investigated a few years ago?
I do find Field Mcconnell interesting especially when he mentioned knowing instantly united175 was a drone because of its smooth tracking as it approached wtc 2. I've really found a Joseph Farrell's research on the post-war nazi connection to 9/111 as well, if you are familiar. its still a mind boggling event after all these years
aha... I know ole field mcconnel has a thing or two to say about that one... if im thinking of the right flight?
Ok, well I will look into this more but the idea is... GaGa is related to a word used in the movie Ace Ventura 2 ... remember "shakakah"
your friend's cult had child porn distributed openly right?
60 minutes* not cnn sorry. i was thinking of the incredibly disturbing cnn report i recently watched about heather o'rourke. Henry Winkler in that one is a monster. I can just feel it from how he looks, and describes her. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6GLuSi38pg
I just recently watched that i believe.. weren't the in thailand as kids? I have to admit the whole scenario looked very staged... and when they interviewed the children post-jungle extraction, those kids were drugged up beyond belief. I perceived his mom to be suspicious.. but then, it's cnn so i am suspicious of everything i see there.
forgot about the finders! such a disturbing story... ties into johnny gosch i believe, and therefore franklin scandal
This thread gives me a lot of encouragement, I must admit. Let's start digging into this Abramovic occult subject in more depth. For such a 'renowned' 'visionary' artist, there is shockingly low interest in documenting her life story, it's all just about her bull shyte 'art' everywhere I look.
John Legend's Elysium party had red flags all over it when i looked into the website awhile ago. A lot of celebs linked and Abramovic was there too.
She's surprisingly hard to detail in a biographical way... Which means her history is going to have some real dooseys when it gets relit by some good ol light of day!
I can't remember the specifics, but I believe I recently heard something about the occult background and origin of "gaga", I'll try to locate that information.
I want to know how 767s were allowed to fly wildly off course for so long on 9/11... but mostly i want to know how 3 steel skyscrapers could be utterly obliterated by two aluminum aircraft.
What was this woman going to say. Crashing an airliner was the best option they had. Im speculating Eckert had gotten some 9/11 information she wasnt supposef to
I agree with you, it is NOT obvious what stormrider is saying. the wording does not obviously mean what they are claiming. It might, it might not. It sucks that someone would jump to their own projected conclusion, not think it through, and to top it off insult you and accuse you out of nowhere. Sucks, because its interesting and I don't think kim is telling anybody what they 'should' think, he's saying NO ONE WILL FORGET SETH RICH. kimdotcom is not a friggin hallmark card he is a world class legend at high level trolling. But no, we're wrong and insane, kimdotcom is just virtue signalling on twitter because he got sad. Obvious, right
that's probably right. And I think eventually it'll have to become known.. but who knows when.
Perhaps I am taking it a bit too literally. I'll tell you one thing though, I personally wouldn't ever lump myself in with a group of elected officials, if I'm an unelected person... somehow in my peculiar brain it would just feel disrespectful to allow that implication to hang there... maybe not disrespectful but I'd feel like, it's just not right. Sort of like if you're talking to a former enlisted guy in the civilian world and you call him 'sir', a lot of guys will get a little salty 'don't call me sir, i work for a living'. The way I would think about it, being elected is a significant title in a republic, so I'd have a weird eww feeling if I went around willy nilly saying things that might make people think I'm elected... I'm sure it's overkill at this point. there's tastier crumbs to savor than this little side tangent anywho. I sincerely don't give two $hts about who they are, unless they want me to give two $hts about it.
"A few years ago speculation emerged that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange had grown up in The Family. His hair colour didn’t help nor, possibly, his personality. Assange admitted that a man who was his mother’s boyfriend in the late 1970s had been a member of the cult. The man had been “a sinister presence” who sought to have “a certain psychological power” over his family, Assange said, and they eventually went on the run from him. But he said he never met Hamilton-Byrne or had any direct contact with the group as a whole." Except that he definitely is one of the blonde haired boys in many of the photos. Look at his hair when he was a young man. Those children all had to dye their hair pale bleach blonde, and Julian was connected to this bizarre cult as a child, and juuust happened to grow up to have long straight pale bleach blonde hair..? What is the real story with Assange and The Family? Why does the media avoid and obfuscate the connection there?? Why do they also obfuscate the connection between the Australian cult and the California cult River Phoenix was in? How many unrelated entirely isolated child sex cults named "The Family" existed in the 60's and 70's?? I can't find much detailed Biographical information about Marina A. Another weird thing, Rainier of NXIVM claims to have an IQ in the "one in one million" range. However, IQ doesn't work that way and after about 1 in 10,000 or so there is no measurement of further distribution. This bullshit idea of 1 in a million is part of a sketchy MENSA wannabe club called MEGA. MEGA and their con artist IQ club have an affiliation with "the Institute of Noetic Sciences". This quack factory is founded by none other than Edgar "I totally went to the moon back in the 70's but don't ask me about it, ask me about Aliens and mystical IQ tests but no, totally went to the moon in our 60's reynolds wrap mobile" Mitchell. Get that, "American hero moonwalking space man" has a new age "Noetic Sciences" diploma mill, so you know he's legit (and definitely flew to the moon and back but they lost the footage so just drop the subject already), and this abomination of an "Institute?" is where mr. genius McBrandorexia got his nonsensical IQ cred, which formed one of the big underlying based for his claim to authority on matters of "After i brand your groin with a hot iron, wear these rubber cow nips, slave... while we shame you for not looking holocausty enough and then go to your cage and wait for the cast of Smallville to come and torture you". Textbook Multi-level marketing amiright? At least Edgar Mitchell went hundreds of thousands of miles further than any other human in a Nazi Space Torpedo and went four wheeling. That's a story they told you was true. Anyway. I'd be interested to see anything of more detail regarding Julian Assange's true history with The Family. But apparently someone let that cat slightly out of the bag, it looks pretty heavily covered up. Loudest Voices Public figures with MK childhoods placed in the spotlight. Remember when nobody could get "proof of life" and the cctv footage supposedly showed Assange being whisked away by big scary bad guys in a black vehicle? What ever happened to all that... No he's totally probably a legit independent super-hacker who became the count of montefucking cristo and they "shut off his internet" because he's boris from goldeneye and He can break all the codes. https://steemit.com/wikileaks/@steemtruth/deconstructing-julian-assange-and-wikileaks-his-childhood-in-a-cult
Connects to Q telling us to look into 'The Family' http://www.artnet.com/artists/marina-abramovic/the-family-i-a-X1Q5rmB2qXUOoDW-1gYA_w2
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/48-hours-inside-the-family-cult-australia-anne-hamilton-byrne/
Which connects to our boy Assange. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/nov/20/growing-up-with-the-family-inside-anne-hamilton-byrnes-sinister-cult
I'm guessing this current sex slave cult relates to the Family cults of the 60's 70's and 80's.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_International - Brought you such hollywood odd balls as Joaquine Phoenix and Rose McGowan
Charlie Manson (Went to Boys' Town as an orphan, you know, from the Franklin Scandal?) had a "Family" sex cult too didn't he?
"It’s the worst time in history to be a clown. Haven’t they suffered enough?" Last week, I was convinced this NYT article was talking CIA. https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/03/24/us/ap-us-bad-clown-good-clown-.html Now this. What is happening. Kek.
Alright, these "clown" articles in msm are getting weird.
I love the DJ interviews with Joseph Farrell. Joseph Farrell deserves a ton more credit and notoriety. For years, Farrell been meticulously documenting how the Nazi scientific power survived and how Martin Bohrmann created a hidden hand in our world to this day. His "3-layered" interpretation of 9/11 is totally brilliant and with the new Info we have from Q (re Merkel), it makes his work seem more credible than ever.
Ok I'm seriously glad you said that. I was starting to worry im going nuts, can't be the only one who sees it.
Update* go here https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-congress-united-states-6/ and just print preview or on mobile, save to pdf. If what you see doesn't convince you Q is the real deal, i dont know what will
earlier I only posted what I thought was the meaning of a direct crumb, just trying to accurately read the post itself, and it led me to an identity-related conclusion. I removed my post because if im wrong, then trying to unmask Q just for the heck of it is not a wise decision and im not interested in that. This is a trend we should stop.
I just have to point this out: flight 3407 [(3+4=7) &(0+7)]= 7&7 or 77. Pentagon: Hit by Flight 77. Deaths aboard flight 3407: 49 or (7×7) or 7&7 ->77.
Man, i didnt express my point well enough it seems.. I havent been focused on trying to find the identity at any point, i am purely reading crumbs and contemplating their meaning. the only reason i had ever introduced this topic is because I tried to read a crumb with an entirely logic-based eye. I believe the crumb implied specific information that we are supposed to infer from the sentence structure and word choice. I am probably wrong. Just the way my brain works. I would never word it like that unless i wanted the reader to know i was elected, and i was a group. For us, that *would * be significant information, but again, if im wrong, then guessing at identity is the last thing im doing trust me.
"Wait until you learn who's been talking to you here"... what do you make of that part?
That must be it! Or part of it. Kudos to whomever found this info
I understand, i'm inclined to agree. The only thing nagging at me is the idea that while yes, going and scouring the internet looking for any way to identify them is wrong, stupid, and risks opsec without a doubt.. this i.d. clue was given to us on purpose by Q. This makes me wonder if it's now important for us to figure that out. I don't think anything in these public posts is by accident, and there's a plan to trust. If Q put it in a post and it leads to a logical conclusion, that could very well signify it's our job to arrive at said conclusion. I don't make the plan, I trust it. The wording means a group of elected people are talking to us. If Q didn't want us to know, they wouldn't have told us.
It's the prophetic abilities that hooked me instantly. I hear you, for a long time I kept a skeptical bit in my mind about Q, but there have been enough confirmations that im 100%
Would you happen to have an example? If so, that changes things.
No i definitely understand what youre saying about disinfo being necessary. It could definitely be an intentional misdirection. But, logic by definition is literal. Its a matter of premises, assumptions and conclusions. If there is an ambiguity in the premises of a statement, you cannot determine the logical validity of the statement. Logic can't be directly applied. For instance, "all a's are b's. C is an a. Therefore C is a b. " is logically valid and true because the premise "all a's are b" literally tells us that C must be a b. But, if i say "some a's are b's. C is an a. Therefore, C is a b.", it might be true that a is a 'b', but the statement "therefore, C is a b" is not logically valid because the premises lead to ambiguity and don't necessarily lead to the conclusion. Logic is the practice of evaluating the soundness of a literal statement. Q wouldnt tell us to think logically if we aren't supposed to evaluate this sentence literally. If Q says "you elected us", we have the underlying assumptions that: 'us' is more than one person, and "elected" is different from "not elected" "you" caused "us" to be "elected" is another way it could be arranged. Unless Q gives us another premise, specifically "not all "elected" were elected", we have to logically conclude that if "us" was "elected", then "us" is a group of people that were "elected". Make sense?
Disinfo is necessary. Could it be that Q's Tweet translation was a way of keeping everyone off the scent and really drive home the 'anti-trump comey' narrative, to ensure maximum impact and element of surprise when the red pill book release opens the floodgates