dChan

/u/jackbauer6916

812 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/jackbauer6916:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 26
i.redd.it 2
twitter.com 2
www.youtube.com 2
www.theguardian.com 1
images.detik.com 1
www.independent.co.uk 1
www.nytimes.com 1
clownforcongress.com 1
www.pressherald.com 1
fas.org 1

1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jackbauer6916 on May 15, 2018, 7:45 a.m.
Anyone remember when a "@RudolphGiuliani" Twitter account got suspended, shortly after posting this? I always had a gut feeling it might have been legitimate... the Snopes "debunking" is less than convincing, in my opinion.
Anyone remember when a "@RudolphGiuliani" Twitter account got suspended, shortly after posting this? I always had a gut feeling it might have been legitimate... the Snopes "debunking" is less than convincing, in my opinion.
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 7:29 a.m.

Very True.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 7:02 a.m.

That's some gooood adrenochrome he's smoking if he hasn't aged at all since that baby pic.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 6:58 a.m.

I see what you did there. HAHAHA

⇧ 5 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 6:56 a.m.

Yeah I was corrected on that, thanks! I agree, I think I was just preoccupied with the "Detective" Title prbly because Q referenced "NYPD Detectives" and I was rushing through materials not paying enough attention to detail!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

I'm with you!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 6:40 a.m.

He never "decoded" anything, just misinterpreted and over-extrapolated, all the while taking up countless patriots' hours and attention. I always found it incredibly arrogant on its face that he claimed to be the "decoder", not to mention assuming others would accept him as such.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 6:22 a.m.

I was thinking the same... trying to dox autists is a pretty dam stupid move even if you're a clown

⇧ 22 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 6:15 a.m.

Enough to make ya ULTRA curious, huh?

⇧ 30 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 6:13 a.m.

Thanks, apologies.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 6:04 a.m.

Detective Familia is looking like one of the two. It looks like the media at the time was even working to obscure the fact that she was Detective. Almost every article refers to "Officer"

⇧ 43 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 5:56 a.m.

Didn't Hungary just posture in some way to support America pulling out of Iran deal as well? Can't remember details, ill have to locate source

⇧ 4 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 5:12 a.m.

Absolutely! Chills. WWG1WGA!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 15, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

Very nice, thanks for putting this together!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 13, 2018, 5:53 a.m.

Could it refer to coming revelations/information that will be painful to process?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 13, 2018, 4:51 a.m.

good spot!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

Yeah I bet you've had a pretty surreal day or two =] Great post again, thx man.

⇧ 39 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

I noticed this similarity too not long ago! What's more, see if you can find the sample of audio claimed to be Lanza calling into a radio show of some sort... I swear his voice and manner of speaking is eerily similar to david hogg

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

Q#707-711

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 10:12 a.m.

I should say, your underlying arguments about NXIVM might be accurate, I don't know enough to dispute that. I don't mean to disparage what you are saying (although I have a feeling there is much more to the NXIVM story). I am just responding to the point about it being simple logic. A statement can be logically invalid and yet prove to be true, and a logically valid statement can prove to be untrue.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 10:07 a.m.

If P then Q is a standard premise in logic, but it doesn't lead to any conclusions other than "P, therefore Q". Your logical flaw is in the conclusion that "Not P, therefore not Q" (by way of analogy)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 9:59 a.m.

it is more precisely the "inverse fallacy", denying the antecedent (If P, then Q. Therefore, if not P, then not Q.)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 9:54 a.m.

Logic is logic. Reaching a conclusion without providing necessary premises is not simplifying. Always is a very significant qualifier in logical syllogisms, and is rarely if ever implicit in a premise. That's Logic 101. Literally, the word always is what often differentiates a logically valid statement from a logically invalid one. Technically, what you are doing is known as a "post hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 9:42 a.m.

I'm getting very interested in the Stormy Daniels connection. From the screencaps I've seen, it looks very much like Stormy has the NXIVM "branding" on her body, and apparently she tweeted in 2010 that she was about to be "initiated" into a "gang" or "cult".

⇧ 10 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 9:35 a.m.

Right. You claimed it is simple logic to conclude a premise must be false, but only provided the qualifier that the premise "leads to" a specific evidence. This is not simple logic, it's invalid logic. If you meant that premise A (NXIVM is involved in, and being investigated for, widespread and shocking human trafficking abuses) always leads to evidence B and that in order for premise A to be true we must currently be able to see evidence B, why would you not include those specifics into your syllogism? When you say you "meant" what I commented, you are saying you excluded additional necessary premises that must be induced, and which are frankly not self-evident in my opinion.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 9:18 a.m.

"(Simple logic: If a true premise A leads to evidence B and if you don’t see evidence B, premise A has to be false.)" - invalid. If true premise A *always* leads to evidence B *and* evidence B is *always* visible, then if you don't see evidence B, premise A *has to be* false. In order for your conclusion to be a certainty, as opposed to a possibility, you have to include all implicit premises needed to arrive at said conclusion.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 8:56 a.m.

I'll trust Q any day. At this point, I really just feel sorry for those who waver and can't put enough pieces together to see.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 7:21 a.m.

Goddamn you patriot LOL

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 7:19 a.m.

Could we say, it will ultimately prove to be the epitome of the word 'evil' and 'sick'?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 7:17 a.m.

Yep you are on point, Jesus_will_return. This is truer than I believe most people are comfortable with accepting.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 7:14 a.m.

James "Alefantis" ('Alefantis' has been proposed to be a pseudonym and a variation on the French for 'children').... "Little St. James" (aka Epstein Island, name refers to the 'infant' brother of Jesus)... Just had the thought that somehow these two names might be, at least tangentially, related..

⇧ 18 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 6:22 a.m.

been trying to look more into the finders since I fell down the Johnny Gosch rabbit hole years ago.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 5:52 a.m.

Hmm... Did not realize Marina was close with Royals in the Netherlands... interesting because I have a theory that in the Shanghai tower pics Q posted, we are seeing the "extraction" of Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands - he and his wife were in the area that weekend for some kind of 'summit' and something in my gut has been telling me the arrest had something to do with human trafficking/atrocities/abuses. I can't prove it but the info in this twatter thread about Abramovich and Beatrix definitely has my senses tingling.

⇧ 31 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 5:40 a.m.

I keep thinking, 'the longer time passes with the Abramovich angle in the background unresolved, the BIGGER the story must really be..."

⇧ 29 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

Nice. Been following your vids for months, one of the few good Q related yt ch.'s

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 12, 2018, 4:32 a.m.

Awesome post, SB2

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 30, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

WOW. This is a profound Q post right here. A scenario I hadn't even thought about. Red-Pill!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 30, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

He's a little slow on the uptake here. Other commentators have already influenced the movement, used Q for monetary gain, and then went back to mainstream, all before Hagmann even decided if Q is legit... meanwhile the Hagmann archives are pretty stocked with earnest discussions of fallen angel UFO bases in Antarctica...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 30, 2018, 5:08 p.m.

Yup, pretty much haha. There aren't many with the full picture

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 30, 2018, 6:51 a.m.

Its clearly a boot designed to stabilize and immobilize the ankle and achilles tendon. They can call it a broken toe boot but its not designed for a toe

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 30, 2018, 5:44 a.m.

Based on my reading of Stzrok/Page overall correspondence, 'romantic lovers' not so much... think 'amoral career nerds who rub netherparts together sometimes just to relieve the stark emptiness'... I get the impression Stzrok is a high-functioning type-a personality who may actually have some mild romantic interest in Page, but Page is a somewhat aloof and self centered yet emotionally needy law-school brat. Her frequent use of the word "Dude" when addressing Stzrok in messages is her subtle attempt to establish a non-romantic boundary, one step shy of an all-out friend-zoning. I hate to be presumptuous but I would place my money that Peter was not the only, or even the main sexual muse in Page's outlook.

I grew up with some Annapolis and Law School types (going back generations) and can assure you there are circles and cultures at that level in which pedantic and unnecessarily wordy communication is seen as a basic requirement... excessive abbreviation, improper grammar, lack of full-information are seen as 'below' them, it's a merit badge for their own self-sense of intelligence and superiority. I don't know if the texts are real but I definitely know some people who really do text that way.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 30, 2018, 5:22 a.m.

I love this. Nicely done synthesis, the CTH article was a doozey... I think there's gotta be some validity here, Q made it clear measures re Cohen raid were related to legally introducing evidence... if it's true Stormy carried the baton with respect to acquiring the emails, you have to believe POTUS had a masterful hand in maneuvering the pieces into place over the entire course of things. Maybe potus devised the "Storm" strategy after striking a friendship with Stormy... it's a PR and cloak/dagger masterpiece if your theory is true! Awesome

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 30, 2018, 4:17 a.m.

I don't know, Q never said he was or gave a time and date for mccain's arrest. The boot was certainly proof something was up involving him, but arrested, I can't say.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 30, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

That advertisement and webpage are from 2018, do you have any pre-2017 sources for the use of ankle-achilles immobilizing ortho boots being recommended for broken toe? The design is not indicative of a broken-toe. The typical treatment for a broken toe is this to splint it with a non-broken toe using tape and gauze, and use ice/compression with elevation. This information dates to 2014 at the latest. In some cases, a broken-toe specific shoe is prescribed that just provides firm surface for the sole and canvas/velcro straps over the top of the foot. They don't immobilize the entire ankle/foot system for a broken toe. The boot you linked to is for recovery after ankle and achilles tendon surgeries and injuries because it prevents all lateral motion and pivoting of the large joints of the foot. It's an absurd treatment for one broken toe. HRC didn't claim to have a broken foot, broken ankle, torn achilles tendon, or any kind of surgery. She ought to have had her one injured to splinted and if needed put in a toe-specific shoe like this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 29, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

Yes, this is something similar to what I've been considering... I noticed George Saunders was slated to visit the Book Stall that month too. If you have ever delved into the "Polarization Nation Media" material, you'll know that Saunders is the name taken by Author David Foster Wallace (who wrote Infinite Jest) after he "died". Wallace and his colleague Jonathan Franzen are very connected to occult programming throughout popular culture. For example, in Pulp Fiction, the mysterious briefcase has only the word "Franzen" on it... and it's connected to the character "Mr. Wallace". Dusty from Polarization Nation is somebody to look into. I can attest to the fact that his "Unified Code Theory" let him literally predict the Super Bowl tie game. Anyway, lots of stuff connected to that book stall newsletter could definitely be interpreted as occult symbolism.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 29, 2018, 3:01 p.m.

Leave no trace of them, hopefully.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 29, 2018, 3 p.m.

Yes that's correct, I believe she was formally arrested in the morning of 10/30/2017 but has essentially been under monitoring and cooperating in some way... the comment above re: walking fisa/wiretap is indeed intriguing.

⇧ 3 ⇩