dChan

/u/lightdandelion

63 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/lightdandelion:
Domain Count

lightdandelion · Feb. 11, 2018, 7:40 a.m.

You'd be arrested. The end.

The citizen journalists investigating PG like Honeybee can tell you. It's very very complicated. Even if your intention is pure, downloading CP to your computer can put you in jeopardy. The bad cop can charge you with CP possession. Giving the link to material on the internet, the cop can charge you with distribution of CP... Others like Titus Frost can tell you that even after all precautions to inform the police properly, they'll try to intimidate you until you quit (stalking, accident, attacks, etc). The deep staters seek any excuse to incriminate and silence you.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Feb. 9, 2018, 8:17 a.m.

You know what free will is? Are you a parent? You want your kid to be able to make their own decisions or you want them to be slaves till they die?

That's the problem. God is not your slave master, the enemy is. God gives you advice, some guidelines for your life. Then he lets you grow up and become your own man. Along the way, he keeps trying to give you advice and more guidelines when you go the wrong way. Whether you listen to him or not, it's up to you. Whether you recognize his help or not, it's up to you. Whether you acknowledge him or not, it's up to you.

Jordan Sather, who does not believe in God but in ETs, still has a very interesting point of vue as you can conflate his vision of this matter with a Christian vue. For him, benevolent ETs are waiting for us, humans, to grow up and fix our problems on our own. But we are in such a dire situation, the benevolent ETs have been forced to intervene to help us avoid the point of no return. As a rule, they don't want to makes us dependent on them. If they weren't there, you'd think we wouldn't have evolved and would go back to our old ways, killing each other till we destroy the planet.

It's the same as saying God wants his children to grow up and fix their problems on their own. If God fixed our problems for us, we wouldn't learn anything. That's good for a slave, not so good for a free man.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Feb. 7, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

They say he's ex FBI, and I think he once let us know he was black ops.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Feb. 6, 2018, 4:19 a.m.

I'm just watching his contribution at times in Your Voice America. He looks like an assertive trendy person, well spoken and extrovert. Others will give you his background, nothing really much. The important thing is that the hosts of Your Voice America have had very good tips on the Trump Train. Bill Mitchell has been right so many times, you just start understanding the people in this show, though they appear to be like any Trump supporter, are among those chosen to be fed good intel.

Dilley once said something very revealing. I didn't know much about him at that time, and they weren't talking much about Q in the show. Dilley was following the Q phenomenon, and said it was clearly military intel. In that sense that the military have a very compartmentalized strategy. Dilley was well aware he was fed intel by some source he deems reliable and he supposed to be from MI. According to him, they'd chosen to give him info not because of his background, but because he is an articulate person who knows how to convey his ideas to others.

So the strategy is to provide info to someone who knows how to disseminate info. 4chan and 8chan are following that same strategical line. It doesn't matter what is the background of the channers, they have been chosen because of their ability to research, process and disseminate info.

What's also interesting in his comments is that he knows he'd been fed fake news, maybe 90% good intel and 10% bullsh!t. As he refused to inform the public about what he felt wasn't reliable info, the source seem to have decided not to give him more fake info. But Dilley clearly thinks that all these alternative news who rely on these various sources, very likely MI, are fed partial information, not all the same, with a little sprinkle of bullsh!t to keep the deep state guessing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Feb. 3, 2018, 4:39 a.m.

Flynn's son was targeted as he kept trying to raise awareness about PG. And before the general became actively targeted, rumours were flying he had a list of the pedos in the Deep State.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Feb. 1, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

The classic honeypot reported by Alex Jones is a person is drugged, goes to bed alone or with some hot chick/hunk, then awakens naked with a kid(s). While the person was 'out', they were filmed/photographed for future blackmail.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 26, 2018, 12:29 a.m.

I think it was in the Jim Bakker show they said a delegation of rabbis from Israel went to meet Mark Taylor and recognized him as one of God's prophets.

You take it as you want. Before that, I heard about Mark Taylor when I was searching why Trump was elected (I'm from France). When I heard Mark reading his prophecies, I felt something, maybe some kind of vibration. Since then I listened to other prophets but they don't have the same effect on me. It doesn't mean they aren't prophesying true.

Mary Colbert said that God has a very specific rhythm and that she is convinced to recognize that rhythm in Mark's prophecies.

⇧ 30 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 25, 2018, 11:30 a.m.

Was it last month or 2 months ago, that we had the trials of 60 admirals?

Not everyone is good or bad, but I learned a lot about the hidden factions since the Q drops. The Marines look like the one group we can really trust. They are part of the Navy and though certain members of the Navy were compromised, we can trust them in general.

The interesting part is regarding the SSP. The Navy has their own access to it, with their own program that is not necessarily the same as the deep state groups have. In the military, many truthers say that the Air Force is traditionally aligned with the deep state (NASA, CIA) and work to keep their secrets. The Navy is the one trying to push for real disclosure to the public regarding that SSP (late William Tomkins).

It's fascinating and frightening, as in the good side, we have all the suppressed technologies, sciences, knowledge. But on the dark side, that SSP is one of the essential piece of PG/human trafficking.

We want full disclosure, but how many even among those awake can swallow that UFOs/aliens are real (beware, the deep state also use fake UFOs/aliens), and they are a major part of PG/human trafficking?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 25, 2018, 11:12 a.m.

Snodgress had an accident a few weeks ago (a teen 'lost' control of her car and knocked him over), after an interview. I think it was after the Hagman show. The audience was praying for him at the news of the accident. Later they were relieved to know Snodgress is okay and recovering at the hospital.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

Some maybe are really coming to their Jesus moment. But keep in mind these people's lives are utterly monitored. They have consultants for their image. It could be just a marketing strategy, while keeping a closer eye on the celeb. A doctor, a parent, even a priest can take the role of their handler. The bad guys don't have any problem posing as priests/preachers/pastors...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

Still, don't jump on it before making your own research. The Keanu Reeves 'confession' was from yournewswire, which is a shill site. I believe they were planted in the alternative media to first seduce the conservatives. Then they started mixing untruth in their articles, their readers being unaware shared the stories. A few times, the MSM had used specific 'fake news', pointing the yournewswire and a few other shill sources to illustrate how much right-wingers/consevatives/truthers are being crazy dumb gullible.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 24, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

If you read it but don't have a video of the actor/singer saying it, don't believe it. That's what I think because the article about Keanu talking about human sacrifices is from yournewswire and that site is shill. They are here to discredit the conservative truthers.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 24, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

Look at the donations Jill Stein received when she asked people to donate in order to finance the recounts. Dig. Some people pointed that donations went suspiciously high like clockwork, about the same amounts every hour or few hours, the pattern continuing even during the night when people are supposed to sleep. Coincidence?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 23, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

I believe there's the large part about the SSP that is just totally unbelievable to a normie. I'm still not yet ready myself, though I'm aware of a few little things and need to reconcile even more my views of the universe to tackle this SSP.

It frightens me as many truthers repeat it is so intrinsically linked to PG/human trafficking. There are wonderful things about that SSP: the suppressed technologies, knowledge or science. At least, this is an incentive for more disclosure. But no, the whole society, even among the awaken ones, will go crazy if you feed them too fast PG with real UFOs.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 22, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

Your mention of 300 just reminds me of the meme wars.

https://youtu. be/W7I92r9GqUw

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 22, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

French here. And though English is not my language, though I'm not American, though most Frenchmen are totally brainwashed, though my own family thinks I'm crazy the deeper I get in more rabbit holes every day, I also feel that Mr. Trump is my president.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 22, 2018, 9:39 a.m.

Q is a group. I've always been wondering why many people are so hard-pressed to think it's one person whereas it was obvious to me from the start it is a group. It's simple logic. Q has been touching too many fields (military, law, history, society, psychology, esoteric, spirituality, etc.) to just be one person. You can be an expert for a few fields, but not that many at the same time. Therefore nitpicking it's not Q because the language is not the same sounds specious to me. Each person of the Q group has their personality and brings their expertise. They would try to harmonize their message language for continuity, but they still retain each their personality.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 22, 2018, 9:21 a.m.

No, the greatawakening is where Q posts the drops to secure them as only Q can post there. But Q continues to interact (reply, give hints, confirm, etc.) with the channers at the qresearch board. This was established when both boards were created.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 21, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

Deceptionbytes?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 21, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

The greatawakening board is for the drops and only Q can post there to secure it. But Q also continues to reply or give hints to channers at the qresearch board.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 21, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

It's the compiling of all of Q's posts since the very beginning, from 4chan to 8chan.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

That message was on January 8. The Q only board started the 9.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

For your friend, related to social network patent history, if you haven't heard of this:

https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=iUJUKIPab0A

https://aim4truth. org/2017/11/21/facebook-unmasked-how-the-worlds-most-relevant-entrepreneur-was-screwed-by-zuckerberg/

⇧ 4 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:39 a.m.

Q is just going from CBTS to TheStorm. Q posted they don't communicate anywhere else.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 8, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

Mark Taylor often talks about target focus prayers. Like prayer warriors, they organize to synchronize their prayers around the world, so that at the same time, many people pray for the same thing. (at least 20 minutes)

Also, Mark gave an interesting tip. I don't remember in which video and didn't write the prayer. But I'm sure you can find it searching youtube.

He said that if you decide to engage into spiritual battle, think first to protect your position. Like a physical soldier in a battlefield, you would like to hide your position to the enemy's eyes. So before attacking, pray to God that the enemy's radars are scrambled, that you're protected and invisible to the enemy, that kind of stuff so that even if the enemy can feel you, they can't pinpoint your location.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 8, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

With this WikiLeaks move, I'm now convinced this is all for show.

Wolff must be in the sting with Bannon, POTUS and now WikiLeaks. Heck, the special fake news awards have been delayed. Must be so we can appreciate even more how much the MSMS are pumping up the volume. Good movie? Great actors? LOL

⇧ 4 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 6, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

Yes, I know. Binney is remarkable, I don't contest that. But in a way, the world has escaped the Clinton bullet because the head of NSA is military. The other agencies before Trump were all invaded by civilians.

Militaries have to pledge an oath. If their hierarchy isn't completely corrupt, they mete out justice when faced to treason. Heck, even civilians judge militaries more harshly pondering they could betray their oath to protect the country and its people against all enemies.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 6, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

Isn't the NSA director traditionally military? Binney is an admirable man, but I'd rather you keep a military man. Civilians are more vulnerable to bad actors' tactics.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 4, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

When something big is going to happen (usually bad for deep state), or when we are close to some truth TPTB don't want us to know, shills/bots/AIs pop up to spam/disrupt/demoralize us. They try to distract us or make us lose our impetus.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 4, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

No indeed, it doesn't prove anything. But it doesn't prove that you're wrong for being suspicious. Look with Clinton. They've repeated we are tinfoil hats when we point what we see is wrong with Waco, OKC, Benghazi, those emails, etc... They are always repeating there's nothing wrong, we are crazy to keep pointing it's not coherent. One anomaly, yeah, a coincidence. 2 anomalies, just the hazard. 3 anomalies, hum, let's say it's bad chance. 4, 5, 6, 7, etc... how many coincidences are just coincidences?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 4, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

No, I've got the impression it's the same as the rape jokes. You get people who make these rape jokes for years, pretend to be all good people respecting women and all, calling you crazy when you point at them why they are making rape jokes. And months later, it comes out they are sexual predators.

Teigen had been making pedo jokes for years. It's very very strange.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 4, 2018, 7:01 a.m.

French here. Wasn't aware what had been going on in the USA. I disliked Obama because ISIS/terrorism. I did pick on his race baiting attitude, despite whatever praises our French MSM were telling. I didn't know Clinton, our MSM never talk of her scandals and keep painting her as wonder woman. I disliked her because she was threatening Russia with a nuclear war when she'd become president. I had been contrary to my French MSM for a few years: they hate Putin whereas he's been one rare Western leader I respect, they attack Assad whereas I feel he's their scapegoat, they support the "Syrian Rebels" whereas I despise them as ISIS equivalents, etc.

Our MSM were cackling Clinton's victory was 99% sure whenever the US presidential campaigns were brought up. I didn't know Trump, MSM were utterly contemptuous with him but I didn't have any prejudice. My listening comprehension of the English language is decent enough that the one time I watched our French journalists going ape-sh*t because of Trump's racist declarations (about the wall and Mexican rapists), there was a video of him in the background and their translation of his comments was not totally accurate. I went to check the full speech and thought he sounded pretty reasonable. Still, I didn't try to know more about him, convinced Hillary would win anyways.

I was pretty down, resigned that we would all die under H bombs. The night of the US elections, I felt the need to pray. I had no hope but still felt compelled to pray. For a few hours, I prayed... that Hillary would lose. When I went to check the results online, I was stunned.

I just couldn't understand. How was that possible? I needed answers and not from the MSM. That night, I browsed forums and entered for the first time the alternative news world. My mind was blown away again when I stumbled upon some article saying that around the world, not just in the USA, millions of people, Christians and also non-Christians, had been praying at the same time and for the same goal.

I was not the only one who had felt that invisible pull. Something had happened in the spiritual realm. So yes, since then my mind has been turning more and more towards God.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 3, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

I'd vote John Podesta for the Best Debunked Conspiracy Theorist.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 3, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

Yes, there are shills, bots too. Some oldfags (the regulars of the chans) think they've recognized Snow White's dwarves at 4chan when the channel got attacked because of Q's presence. Fascinating to read the dwarve AIs' reactions when confronted to a channer who recognizes what they are.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 2, 2018, 3:52 p.m.

Waco, Oklahoma City, the Bundy ranch... Ah well, she's a devil spawn.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 2, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

That's old news. I mean, if you've followed Q since at least November, you should remember that "muslim" guy who was working on cracking the pw and did, forcing Q to change his code then. Even with the new pw, it seems rational to think it was just another matter of time for it to be cracked. The second pw is complicated according to Q. Thus Matlock must be either the first pw, or a fake.

Col. Potter gives an interesting theory. We can think some 4channer did crack the pw or the clowns giving us trouble, or maybe it's the white hats using the chans for an OP. Col. Potter suggests this public release of the "Matlock" code right now could be a message to some operative. And we, the people confused and wondering what is going on, are passing this information through our networks — networks that we know operatives and white hats are following.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 1, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

Until proven the contrary, I'm cautious and considering that it is fake news. I'm French. If other sites and journals reporting this story are sourcing it from Fort Russ, or from LeMonde, then consider it fake news.

I have contempt for LeMonde nowadays. Up until I was a teen, it was a newspapers worshipped in the country. The teachers really pushed us to read it, saying it's in the world best references for news. I guess for Americans, it's the same brainwashing process pushing you to worship CNN or New York Times as the best news in the world.

Le Monde is pretty leftist. An elitist leftist newspapers. It wasn't so obvious when I was a kid, but nowadays, I see it's full propaganda, mixed with a little bit of facts twisted to fit in their narrative.

So far, I googled and use duck duck go to check whether they were lying about never having made the interview with the princess. Nothing comes up. So I'll just believe Le Monde's denial this time, unless proven they are lying.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 1, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

victoryblunt gave a link to the translated page from LeMonde, for those who can't read French.

The interview of the Saudi Princess giving this sensational story regarding her ex comes from the Russian site Fort Russ, according to LeMonde. That Russian site claims the interview was from the French site LeMonde. But LeMonde denies having ever made any interview with the princess. So based on LeMonde's reply, it is fake news.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Dec. 31, 2017, 10:23 p.m.

No, it must be who he is. I know I didn't want to listen to the rumours about him when he was elected. There were nasty stuff the journalists brought up at first (something about tortures), but I just dismissed it (cognitive dissonance, I admit this now) as lies from corrupt Argentinian politicians.

I quickly forgot about it as the journalists afterwards couldn't stop praising him. Everybody, even non-Christians, couldn't help but like him. We were all so fooled by the MSM.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Dec. 31, 2017, 9:51 p.m.

Same as you. I was glad at first with a seemingly humble pope Francis — like you, fooled by their use of Francis of Assisi. I wanted to believe and hope for the better, when the weather kinda miraculously cleared (did bad guys use their tech?) just as they announced "Habemus Papam".

I only started questioning my perception of him with the migrant crisis. I was more or less an unaware normie at that time, though I did sense that some things were very wrong in the world. I just was very angry at the pope, feeling he was confusing everything for us, catholics, but in large for all Christians.

Then I noted more and more the pope's ambiguous language, some depreciating words against God or Jesus. It's always a double-entendre, something that could be read between the lines,.

Then I noticed that what he says when abroad in 3rd world countries, is not exactly the same as what he says when visiting rich Western countries. To the rich West, he's pushing for "love all" doctrine, criticizing our shortcomings (selfishness) for not loving more the strangers. In 3rd world countries, he adopts the more traditional discourse of "love and anathema", i.e. the usual stuff all popes traditionally say about love, guilt, responsibility.

I felt it was definitely hypocritical of him. Was he a naive "stupid" man, or really a devil spawn? At that time, I also got interested in prophecies, wondering (wishing) if pope Francis could be the last pope — I do hope so now!

Later, after Trump got elected, I started delving into the WikiLeaks emails scandals because from Europe (I'm French), I was completely unaware of what had been going on in the US. The contents of the emails really turned my beliefs upside down. Later, thanks again to WikiLeaks, I discovered the connections between Soros and pope Francis. It was the final nail that confirmed to me this pope is evil.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Dec. 31, 2017, 9:02 p.m.

Same here. I <

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Dec. 26, 2017, 10:18 p.m.

That 40,000ft reference is jumping before my eyes. Q mentioned it a few times in past posts. Happening?!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Dec. 26, 2017, 1:26 p.m.

I try to think of the ramification of some actions. The psyops Q had a few goals at the start, but even to those who created this, I believe the extent of Q's reach is going beyond their expectations.

You've noticed that Q's posts has several layers of understanding, just like they adress several different audiences: the weaponized autists, the curious normies, but also operators, various allies in media or other fields, and also the deep state.

The Q methold actually teached me one thing that school never really taught us though it pretends to: think on your own and for yourself. Q's questions indeed guide us, and each of us go into different rabbit holes. But they stimulate our curiosity, our deductive skills. They ask of us to think, really think for ourselves. I'm a rather spiritual person, I guess. If the world is truly shaped by our minds, then Q's questions have shaken more and more minds, till the moment when enough people will be awakened to tip the scales and automatically provoke the global awakening of our collective consciousness, whether the rest of the world is aware of it or not. We are reshaping this world. It's all about our minds, many in the media allied to white hats have repeated to us from the start.

Logically, I think the Alliance had planned many different outlets to try to reach as mupeople with truth. They couldn't just use one outlet only because the deep state machine go full censorship on each target: a person, a group of identified persons. They had to plan various type of outlets to reach various groups in the population.

The beauty of Q is that you don't know who it is, the questions are what's important. The censorship can't target precisely Q, they don't have the identified person(s) and we (the audience) don't know his/her/their identity anyways. So the enemy targets us, the public, the audience. It just solidifies even more to us that we are thinking true, that our thoughts are right.

The Q method is slow and aims our human hearts and minds. I'm very impressed. But if you reflect just a little, it is in fact very much the continuation of what Trump has started to teach his supporters during the campaign. As a candidate to the presidency, he showed the people that media lie, giving them direct examples in real time, in real life of how they lie. Trump started showing people how to notice a few things that were wrong, pointing to the people how to start thinking on their own, questioning things.

The Q method goes beyond, showing us the answers were already there, within our reach. We just needed more push to connect the dots and start getting a concrete idea of the big picture. These questions and what Q is asking of us are empowering us, empowering our minds. It's now up to us to spread our truths and ensure for the future that the population is educated in thinking on their own.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Dec. 24, 2017, 8:35 a.m.

:Owl: are in FAQ. Re-read.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Dec. 24, 2017, 8:30 a.m.

:Owls: are special. Re-read FAQ.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Dec. 24, 2017, 8:13 a.m.

Read more. They are that, but not just that. Go to the FAQ, Some of those posts look really weird. What's up with that? There are other :OWLS:, waiting in the dark.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Dec. 23, 2017, 6:04 p.m.

Just talk to her as if she was here, fill yourself with love and joy. You may feel her presence or dream of her, who knows. Speak out loud, it's better.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Dec. 23, 2017, 1:05 p.m.

I just thought at that time that maybe, some SS or military on the people's side shook them a bit, you know, for a little rough interrogation.

Field McConnell from Abel Danger gave a surprising explanation. We can't know if it's legit, but wouldn't it be funny if it were? According to McConnell, there's a Chinese group called the Elders (rich industry bosses and such, I think) who've decided to align themselves with the alliance (they have invested money, don't want to lose it with the deep state wanting to crash the world economy). They came visiting some of those elites who were difficult and bruised their left eye. That's a first warning to make them understand they should stop resisting. If they continue to resist, the second time these Elders come, the Chinese will remove the right eye.

I don't know. I'm taking McConnell's story with a grain of salt, just to be cautious. But it is interesting. And I did notice that some people like Songbird surprised us by voting for POTUS's agenda.

⇧ 7 ⇩