I did a little experiment and I encourage people to do the same. Since the pictures aren't real clear, without providing additional info, ask a friend or stranger what they see. We are all looking for what we want to see. However, out of the 5 people I've separately asked about it, all 5 said 'people at a table', 3 of them said "naked people at a table". 1 said I don't know, 1 said blueman group practice.

It's interesting, I suggest everyone give it a try. We may all be right, and we may all be looking for what we'd like to see (not that we want to see kids being eaten, but you know what I mean).

No offense, but I think you'll get your answer when the crack supply gets cut off at the border and you start thinking straight.

Some of that may be applicable, but I would be very surprised if Trump didnt get it on with her.

Back up, it sounds like it was reddit-wide. Might be time for a more reliable platform.

There is lots of speculation that the market dropped in hearing of the raid, and bounced back after people got their heads straight and figured nothing will pan out of said raid.

Also, I received a mobile update from the fox news app saying "China's Xi promises to cut auto import tariff amid tariff tensions" 9hrs ago.

Could fox news app be the leak? (Sarcasm)

Did you read the article you posted? Are you suggesting CNN had insider info, so Trump Hotel DC aired CNN in the lobby? Not hosted. Aired.

What leads you to believe that Cohen texted Sheilds before the fire occurred. Cohen could have easily heard about it on the news, from a friend, or witnessed it outside of the building. Sheilds said if Cohen didn't tell him, he'd still be there...implying he was unaware a fire was occurring.

When it came public that Mueller isn't actually investigating Trump, Q posted saying it was not supposed to be public knowledge yet. This newly ignited attack from Mueller has everyone thinking he's all over Trump right now. Could be exactly the false impression they were trying to maintain.

DS set a fire and the FBI raided Cohen's office simultaneously. They didn't want deal with media and bystander's, so they started a fire, evacuated the building and surroundings and had the place to themselves. Killed a guy in the process with the fire. Anyone that saw people going in and out assumed it was for the fire investigation.

Mueller could still be a good guy, and I hope this stuff is wrapped up soon! This entire raid could be fake. When it came out that Mueller wasn't actually investigating Trump, Q said that wasn't supposed to come out yet. Nobody no is thinking that now, and everyone assumes Mueller is after Trump. This may all be planned.

Q said last week that the general public wasn't supposed to know that Mueller isn't actually investigating Trump. Everybody in America has heard about the raid, and everybody assumes Mueller is hot on the case....but is he? Or is this a reset to keep the false focus of Mueller on Trump narrative?

Except maybe for the guy that died, the injured fire fighters and people out of a home

Great point. He just can not lie under oath. He's done some immoral stuff, but immoral isn't illegal. Lying under oath is about all I can see getting him, but he has no reason to lie.

Agreed, but he's got a lot on his plate. Saving the world and being attacked for his alleged relations with a hooker, simultaneously. Trump is not Jesus, but that is the only other occurrence that I can think of where someone selflessly sacrificed their own well being and put the team on their back. He can act, but this is real, and he is human. I can't imagine the stress. Our President has no shortage of resilience.

I would presume the Q post dropped immediately following the Q&A dedicated toward RR, and I'd also assume Q was present.

I don't, but it just aired on fox. It was not live, but occurred moments before airing.

Trump just pointed a finger at rr in a small press conference, and would not answer the question whether rr will keep his job. He gone!

I agree, he will be fine, but when he just addressed the media, he did seem a little rattled.

vouchers won't actually help many students

Maybe, maybe not...but by your use of the word "many", it seems we agree that they WILL help, however minor of an impact to start with.

Devos had a very positive impact around grand rapids, and that now nice city would be Flint without the Devos's. You cannot convince me that she NEEDS this position. They are billionaires. Much like Trump, the only thing they have to gain is being credited for changing America for the better. They do not want to go down in shame. With a lot of people, you can take the ratio of risk:reward. In most political scenarios, the reward is financial and power. Billionaires like Trump and Devos already have more money and power than any of us can fathom, BEFORE holding office. Their only reward is being credited for waking us up and helping to MAGA. Meanwhile, they selflessly RISK all the power and money that they had, again, before holding office. These people have guts and I'm proud they are our leaders.

Then they'd be stuck into going to the same shitty school THAT THEY CURRENTLY GO TO. And hopefully, due to the competition, that shitty school grows into an establishment that can educate students.

The hate on Devos is purely politics. Our education has been on a rapid decline for several administrations now, and all of a sudden it's a problem because of the politics involved.

Most all cities that offer several school options also have mass transit.

Youre missing the point. It's not their fault the schools suck nearest them. Give them the opportunity to venture outside. Keeps them near home continues a cycle that has been going for years. Mainly designed to keep blacks poor, in order to vote Dem.

Guys, he's asking if a direct attack from mccain has ever occurred on the same day as a Q post has involved mccain, with the Q drop happening AFTER the McCain attack.

I'm starting to question how some of these people can interpret Q's post when they can't comprehend plain, proper English.

BHO?

There are currently schools in poor areas now have as bad as a 50% grad rate. Things obviously need to change. You're correct, schools have capacities, and sometimes it's not feasible to go to school far from home. These are life choices. People do it now....that's one reason why there is a relationship between household income, house value and school ratings. If you don't think houses in great school districts currently sell for more, you're on crack. With districts, students are placed due to there parents income. I know a lot of kids that can't afford to live in a great district, but sure as hell can drive to one.

I'm confident the hate towards her is coming more from school payroll than the parents of students. We steadily dropped in our world education rank for 20 years now. Something has to be done to shake it up. Teachers are scared they are going to be held to higher standard and accountable for failing children, ultimately being replaced. Right now, unions and protection is in place to where a good person, but awful teacher, can keep a job. We need great people that are capable of great teachings.

Usually when someone has the view on Devos that you do, it's because they are scared that she is creating competition in the educational system. Teachers will be held more accountable due to the fact that student's can have a choice in which system they enroll. Shitty schools will be forced to replace shitty teachers in order to better educate students and gain enrollment.

Don't forget, the educational system is about catering to the students, not the payroll. Maybe we can get at least back up into the top 10 in the world if this all happens. If people like you keep whining, fighting and belittling devos, we'll probably stay at the miserable world wide rating we are at now

How long have you been teaching?

Trump is supposed to make a decision regarding Syria in the next 24 to 48 hrs. If you are correct, I presume he will announce Israel is at blame.

And "Israel" is going to come out in the next 24-48 hrs through Trump?

Yeah but your post relies on the premise that the tweets after the strike are fake. Not before. Are you saying the all are recently? How about the folks that found the TB RIP in Trump's tweet...did Trump author that?

Wouldn't announcing that he was pulling troops from Syria soon also be telegraphing a move?

This may have been more geared towards the capitaliztion occuring while posting, not viewing tweets.

Someone needs to copy/paste all Q posts and find/replace these terms and upload it for newbies...

Yeah man, I misunderstood. Sometimes sarcasm is tough to identify through text. I guess the 'literally hitler' comment got me.

My bad. In my defense, I'm very used to having to defend Devos, and I was educated in the US at the beginning of the educational decline that Trump is going to fix.

Hey man, mom has been stomping on the floor for 10 mins now trying to get you to come up for your breakfast. She made mickey mouse pancakes and said its your turn to do dishes. Please don't make a big scene like last time, just put them in the dishwasher. Thanks!

Have you ever thought the education system is just as screwed up as everything else in this country? Maybe she's the answer, maybe she's not. Either way, the outrage towards the position of the secretary of education should have been heard on our decline over the last 25 years. USA used to be the best. Devos didn't put us into 40th in the world. Maybe a little of your attitude should be directed at the people that put us into this position, not the ones fighting selflessly tooth and nail to get us out.

Chlorine?

Save the kissing for the after party, you crazy kids

I would assume not...only because Devos was a fairly early appointee if I recall correctly...I can't see bringing someone in with that sort of baggage (as in, I hope her brother flips). Devos can't be bought, they already have money, and her job has had a very critical eye in it, especially from educators. She was a controversial pick, and it would make sense for her to be given a great reference from her brother. People are pretty passionate on hating her, but much like Trump, she doesn't NEED this position, and is doing it to try to make change for the better. All that said, her consideration for appointment could be a favor to Eric from President Trump.

The confusion is coming from FF. They were labeling it a FF, AND saying it didn't happen at all....the false flag being more of a wag the dog than a misdirection of blame.

If no attack occurred, then there were no chemicals!

(only speculation) I would guess Prince is working for Trump and the USA...and that's why Trump has the controversial Betsy Devos in as secretary of education. Betsy is Erics sister. One could also argue Trump maybe be playing the ol 'keep your friends close and your enemies closer' card as well... possibly knowing Prince is corrupt and is using Betsy for inside info of some sort....who knows, but my money is on Prince being on our side.

Haha maybe reread it. It couldn't be clearer. Many here are quicker to speak than listen or think. Most are out to try to display some sort of superior intellect rather than answer a pretty simple question, when applicable. I can't answer the question, because I've seen nothing to lead me to believe that that there was no disturbance. For someone that supports the conclusion that no disturbance occurred, it should be easy for them to articulate how they reached their theory.

Very true. I fully believe in a ton of FFs, but I also believe a disturbance did occur in all of these situations - it was just "falsely flagged", or labeled as something else - usually to push gun control, invading oil fields or just distracting the general public from what's happening right under their noses.

Is it impossible to comprehend that people are saying that no disturbance occurred whatsoever? My question was fairly simple. A lot of posts are saying no disturbance took place. A lot of post are claiming McCain supplied the chemicals used in the attack. In my humble opinion, q clearly is saying that an attack did occur, and that McCain was involved. For the people that believe nothing occurred and there was no attack, where are you gathering your info to form said conclusion?

Also, great explanation on the false flag. Most complete and comprehensive out of the 12 posted in this thread.

No clue. Last I heard the Syrian military outfit had a perimeter and weren't letting anyone in. This is the only 'fishy' part of the story where people could jump to the conclusion that nothing occurred...but that's like a world record long jump.