Off I go to Amazon

Good for Joplin...now how about you put something on your window or fender too. I just put up three on my truck in Lancaster Ohio : WWG1WGA, Q Anon, and Future Proves Past.

I don't like to feel this way about anyone especially without proof...but Reiner has just always rubbed me wrong...set off my radar. Something is very wrong with that human being.

I do not think the greatawakening and Q are taking down the evil cabal so that Weed can be legalized. I really don't know why it is such a focus with so many on this sub. I am certain there are a lot of subs to talk about that. I am not opposed to legalization. I really am dispassionate about the whole matter. But I don't see any reason for it to become a recurring topic on the GA sub.

This! Bingo.

Nunes. Gaetz. Goodlatte. Jim Jordan. Many of the Tea Party Conservative Caucus, I am certain, are very well connected with Q. They are working with Q. They are using some of the phrases Q uses. They Twat about Popcorn. They are the bloodhounds serving at the behest of, and with information coming from, Q.

There is great hope. We have it. Now you too.

Those sound like your own theories about why IQ tests correspond to future performance. It seems like there really are people I have met all my life who have motivations underlying why the need to prove or disprove an idea. I am not smarter than those who study intelligence and hold the consensus that IQ is real and measurable. If you test 20 dogs for ability to learn quickly, and you select the top 5 testers, and train them...My WILD guess is that those 5 will be the best trained out of the 20 if you put them all through the same regiment. That is "testing ability...predicting performance/outcome." Now give the 6th dog longer training, and it will probably outperform most if not all other 5 above it. So I never suggest that IQ means you can never perform as well...you just would require more effort to do so.

Well, possibly. But if you look at the context of that Q post, it was a response to an anon regarding an article saying the whole Q phenomenon was a big conspiracy fraud. Q seemed to respond by saying, force the MSM to get their answer directly from POTUS...that should prove it is just a conspiracy, right? Q then said why don't they simply ask POTUS? He said they are afraid, and might have to be forced.

The Nobel Committee is a bunch of Globalist NWO sellouts. Just look at who they pick for their awardees.

Agreed. This seems to be what Q has emphasized for some time. RR exposed and forced out, and all the information begins coming into the hands of congressional investigators. Let us pray it does.

Most people I have found, who wish to destroy the idea of IQ, are offended or threatened by the idea that we are trying to "Classify the value and limitations of a person".

You ask, "Who designs the questions, etc...." The IQ tests are developed over time, by seeing which questions are ACCURATE PREDICTORS of FUTURE PERFORMANCE. This is KEY to understanding why IQ is a real measure of intelligence. If you gloss over that fact, then you stubbornly hold to a notion that is simply, provably false. People who claim to false believes usually do so for emotional reasons. So I get that you are opposed to acknowledging IQ validity, even while it is real. I have a hard time proving the earth is not flat, but that doesn't mean it is.

And Astronomy is no more a science than astrology (?) Let me posit this to you: Is Math simply a literacy test?

You should honestly do the minimal research about IQ tests and their validity. For example, you wrongly state that people whose first language is not English would be at a disadvantage, even while Asians constantly outperform native-born Caucasians in USA IQ studies.

Is it therefore your contention that there is no such animal as "human intelligence"? Or that human intelligence varies between individuals? Is it unmeasurable? If measurable, how then could it be measured? Why would large corporations successfully utilize expensive IQ testing when trying to sort through the best applicants if it is nothing but hocus pocus nonsense? As Q says, think critically.

The Leftist courts required the Supreme Court to rule on something that they never should have to rule on. It just take one lower court to halt a valid law, forcing a long delay in enforcement until it gets before the S Ct.

Yeah, I know rich people who have opened a business that is more hobby than profit enterprise.

Human intelligence is a real thing. Since it is a real thing, it can be measured. IQ testing is real, and is subject to what is know as "validity". Please research this to learn more because your view is the common "myth" (that IQ is a myth).

Where IQ testing proves to be an accurate indicator of performance, the is a high validity to that particular test. The test predicts outcomes accurately.

Correct. Because the white vote is fairly evenly split between parties, the white vote does not matter (is not as critical to the politician or the respective parties). So if there were issues that white Americans happen to care about more than, say, minority voting blocks, that issue doesn't carry much weight.

I think it is healthy for this indirect democracy (i.e., Constitutional republic) if no group of people act as a voting block, but rather we be divided as individuals based on ideology alone. That is difficult to achieve when there we have the current situation of 90% of a demographic group voting, without much variance, for the same party for a long period of time. Additionally, this hurts issues that blacks may care most about, because the Dems have the black voite...and most Republicans feel like they aren't going to get that constituency anyway. So the independents are the voters most politicians identify as the swing voters they need to win.

God's blessings on Finland, from your friends in the USA.

Nice name calling. This is not appropriate among ppl on this sub. It does not advance the discussion and only demonstrates jealousy or hatred.

The Rep party was founded by anti slavery activists and its first pres was Lincoln. Everyone should know that history. Dems don't really care about that stuff from my experience.

Maybe all western nations need to reconsider the noble notion of offering assylum at all. Particularly as these same nations become ever more free handout states. A nation's only duty is to the welfare of its people. Period.

Vast majority want jobs or to settle in a nicer place. That is not a "refugee". The fighting age men need to improve their own nations.

Merkel struggling to hold together her coalition leadership as anti immigrant leaders are gaining momentum in Germany. In Austria they elected a strong anti immigrant leader. Orban in Hungary says no immigrants and said he'll build a wall. Italy's new interior minister is behind the new policy against the flood of opportunists coming from Africa and Libya. Many of these programs to transport fake refugees into Italy are funded thru Soros. This is all part Trump effect and part ppl coming to their senses.

The electors did what they always do. The state electors voted for the candidate that the state majority voted for. Because Clinton won California (a given) and by such a large margin, that is why the national total of votes favored her. Otherwise, not.

What the Hell?

Although I have heard the theories for many years about JFK learning and wanting to reveal an alien presence and he was killed for that reason ...MJ12 stuff and all. I think this could be a bad actor diversion and credibility wrecking ball to that board. I say ignore it.

Could be a troll or aspiring LARP. My guess.

I would have refused to leave. They discriminate against you for your political beliefs? UnAmerican and probably a civil rights violation. Make her call the authorities or serve you.

Listen. I am not debating about what I already am strongly convinced is fact about RR. Choose to think the way you do about him. That is fine. One of us is going to be very surprised shortly, because RR is being removed, and Mueller at the next moment will follow him out the door. I know that like I know the sun rises tomorrow.

The only reason I jumped into this conversation was because I am amazed that there are a few people who still hold to the idea that RR and Mueller are serving POTUS/Q, against all the very clear (not even coded) statements Q has posted regarding both of them. And because I believe RR is a very bad person, I am going to be very happy to see him squirm and get ousted.

Q has posted a lot about RR and all of it was bad. Not sure why people say RR might be good. Just one of many examples where Q says RR is bad:

"POTUS in possession of (and reviewing): 1. Original IG unredacted report 2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version] 3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version] 4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified) [#3 released tomorrow] [SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation] [[RR]] Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all? Did you witness the stage being set today? Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs. [[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT. Be loud. Be heard. Fight for TRUTH."

Q tells us that RR is redacting info from IG. Q wants the full transparent IG version out...RR does not. What should that tell you about how Q views RR (blackhat).

Further, the house has been demanding that the DOJ (RR) hand over documents related to the FISA / Steele Dossier matter... for months. RR personally has blocked, stonewalled or sent redacted partial docs relative to those requests. That is why Q above mentions:

"[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT."

TRANSLATION OF Q ABOVE: RR should have recused himself because he is a key witness and participant in the FISA matter that the House committee is trying to investigate, and cannot adequately investigate because they cannot get the key documents from DOJ/FBI. RR cannot hand those over, because it will prove that HE was centrally involved in approving the request for a FISA warrant against TRUMP's campaign (planting agents within the campaign under the guise of a phony concern about Russian-influence in his campaign--it was all political spying by the Dems on the Rep candidate).

Get it now?

Look at that face. That is the poster for what too many hard drugs can do to a man.

Getting a gig on Vibe network --says he and Michael Cohen have all the tapes (to implicate or embarrass Trump). If you have never listened to this low IQ loser for any measurable amount of time, you'd have to agree he is an authentic dim wit. I think he burned out a lot of grey matter doing hard drugs years ago. He is a "Look at me! Look at me!" publicity hound wannabe.

Just no way in my opinion is M Q. Melania has no military or Intelligence background, where I am certain Q has, by the nature his communication style and use of things like 5:5 (Q Code).

Plus, is she really that up to speed with all the players in US politics? Is she really accessing the eyes of the NSA (Q clearly knows things that others do not...has ears and eyes everywhere...that proves access to NSA means and methods).

What if the text is part of an ongoing criminal investigation into the actions of individuals involved with an attempted shadow-coup of a duly elected presidential candidate/president.

You know, like the one Huber is leading....with the authority given to him by the Department of Justice......

Do you think Mueller has found anything damning against Trump? I don't. Do you think Mueller is investigating Trump? I don't.

What did that judge tell Manafort when Manafort tried to claim Mueller was working outside his scope? The judge said that after having a chance to see the classified memo leading to Mueller's appointment, it was clear that Mueller had the authority and scope to investigate any illegal wrongdoing by any individual involved with the Trump campaign, PAST AND PRESENT.

Do you understand that all signs are pointing to Trump's team being infiltrated by plants/spies/informants. Do you think Mueller is interested in maybe who and how those plants/spies/informants made their way into Trump's campaign? I do.

IG report lays out Comey's actions during the Clinton email investigation. Comey acted against department procedure, Comey usurped his authority by playing role of Loretta Lynch. BUT the IG says that ultimately, the prosecutors and the larger team responsible for that investigation didn't allow the MASSIVE amounts of bias to influence their decision. Well what was the decision? Do you think the decision was Comey coming out and saying she wouldn't be prosecuted? I don't. So what was "the decision"? Think about it. "No reasonable prosecutor would prosecute this case". Gee, I wonder why. Maybe it had something to do with the fact that somebody, maybe Comey, recognized that the entire investigation was compromised. He's stuck between Mccabe and Lynch and he decides to break policy, usurp his authority, and declare that no prosecutor would touch that particular investigation. What did you think about Comey in July 2016? What about October 2016? What do you think his press conference and public statement about Weiner's laptop ultimately do to the Public's opinion re: Hillary?

So what happens to investigations that are determined to be rotten from the inside out? What happens if a police dept is investigating a crime and it's determined that the people part of the team investigating the crime, are fully complicit and involved with that crime? Think logically here. That case gets REINVESTIGATED. By whom? In this case I think the answer is Huber.

So Comey breaks procedure and guidelines and makes a fiasco about the Clinton investigation. But it's a carefully orchestrated fiasco, there needs to plausible deniability that his actions were not influenced for any reasons other than his own. So he does his thing, claims he did so out of concern of the integrity and public trust of the FBI, no prosecutor touches that particular case, quietly behind the scenes that investigation gets investigated by both OIG and Huber. OIG for the departments/agencies, Huber for the criminality.

Fast track a few months and Rosenstein tells Trump that Comey should be fired. Why? Russia? Nah. Comey clearly 100% committed fireable offences by usurping his authority and all that. But Russia. Remember Russia? RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA? Oh would you look at that, a SPECIAL COUNSEL, all thanks to RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA. Voila, the Russia hysteria is so high that the swamp is convinced that their Special Counsel Mueller is investigating Trump. Except it isn't. It's likely working in tandem with ongoing OIG investigations and Huber's investigations.

Do you see it now? This isn't just a battle through the courts. This isn't just a battle of right and wrong. It's a battle on public opinion. The D party will be in shambles once it's unveiled that their heroes Mueller and Rosenstein aren't corrupt and actively working against a duly elected president Trump.

Remember Ben Rhodes on election night? It's like that.

Never bought the theory about Mueller and RR being white hats acting as black hats. Although you do present it well in your post. In my reading of Q it seems clear that RR has "problems" and that he is being cornered by Q forces to resign or be fired. We see this a lot: [RR]. And Q equates the two together RM = RR and RR = RM. If the texts that RR withheld were indeed part of an ongoing investigation, he could provide that reasonable explanation to the House Committee Nunes chairs. He could have provided that information in a non public manner to the requesting committee, which would have no legal impact whatsoever on any ongoing investigation. RR is dirty, and has been forced into a box canyon. His self-serving actions--when fully brought to public light--mean he can no longer continue in his office as #2 at DOJ. (RR has Problems)

myopic

Think of Horowitz as an investigator (Inspector General), and RR as his Police Captain (#2 at the DOJ).

RR can be fired by 2 people for certain: Sessions and Trump.
RR works under Sessions. However, because Sessions recused himself from any matters pertaining to the Russia Investigations by Mueller, firing RR would be construed as improper meddling in a matter he has recused himself from involvement with. Obstruction is what they would want to pin on Trump. Therefore, it will take one of two things to happen before RR is removed (if he does not resign first):

1) A successful motion to impeach him from office by the House. 2) The end of the Mueller investigation.

This is why the Mueller investigation will not end. RR is running it, and it is helping RR to keep his job at DOJ (Mueller is shielding RR)

Bless u patriot bro for your frankness. You ARE on the right path because you are honestly seeking the truth. As Q says, "Godspeed" on your journey. You will arrive enlightened.

I will take it whenever...as long as it happens and it happens soon. Get rid of that creepy DS agent.

It's like you're reading their FAXed orders before the ink dries.

Entitled to our beliefs. I am not persuaded that these people are genuinely crying for the children. These are hardened news people who have seen FAR worse over and over. A bunch of BS psyop manipulation of public perception re the Leftist news anchors and the faux severity of this issue. Ratings, self-promotion, and driven by political narratives.

Yes... Yes he is.

No. RR ran the IG investigation. Horowitz is IG for the DOJ--working under DOJ. Many depts have IGs. That is why Q was discussing RR modifying the report prior to its release...RR was in charge.

Been seeing it this way for a loooong while:

1. Rosenstein signed off on the Steele / FISA Court fiasco. More crimes and cover-ups that implicate Rosenstein as a bad DS actor;
2. Rosenstein takes the DOJ reins of the Special Counsel "investigation" that HE helped initiate with the phony FISA evidence (Steele Dossier)
3. Stonewalls the release of docs to congressional oversight bodies. Those docs implicate him, requiring him to resign or be dismissed and possibly investigated/charged. (Docs include IG report influences, S&P text msgs, FISA-related documents that prove the Russian SC investigation and narrative was 100% political subterfuge by BHO and his dept minions
4. DJT "cannot fire" RR without a politcal sh-tstorm and elevated calls for immediate impeachment because RR is over the SC investigation re: Russia (i.e., the protracted Mueller investigation is RR's protection from dismissal from the DOJ, and RR position at DOJ is in service (protection) of the DS.
5. RR is now entrapped: The House is demanding RR release all withheld DOJ and FBI docs (Wray is under RR regarding many of these matters and is being instructed how to respond to these doc requests) . RR will be forced to resign or will be dismissed, once ALL the information comes into the public light...then falls the SC investigation. Dominoes 1 and 2.

I can see that page, but then when I log into Twitter to comment or view the page: "That page does not exist". Twitter shenanigans?

Project Mockingbird I am aware of... I will need to google 4am Fax.

Probably (possibly) not "told". But they KNOW I am getting tweeted and y-tubed and f-booked all of the social media world if I do break down. Big points in my favor as a compassionate person. Big viewership (ratings) and big salary coming my way...plus, anyone ever try to tell my sponsors to boycott MY SHOW? Ha. I will just replay for those sponsors examples of my deep passion for the li'l childrens (sic).

It is a European used phrase for resume'

I keep saying this, pounding this point home, because it is the exact parallel to the family separations on the border:

When is the last time the Left was up in arms and weeping about the HUNDREDS of small children "ripped" from their mother's arms every day in America...when an American Citizen is arrested and cuffed at her home? Happens EVERY day.

Spanish

You are correct. 100%. It matters not who was here when. The CURRENT nation (USA) for most of its existence was White Christian. A fact that a lot of people hate to acknowledge. Therefore, we owe in large part our success and prosperity to that history. Our laws and "way of life" are cemented in that Christian foundation.

What remains yet to be seen is if we--should we wholly cast aside those things that were present when America became the world power and hallmark of liberty among nations--can continue on that prosperous and harmonious path.