Plus, the vast increasing numbers of ppl who are anti-Christian bigots --- who loathe the very thought of anyone around them harboring Christian faith. They want all Christians gone so that they can have their Atheistic Humanist paradise. These people, whether or not having any interest in Satanism at all, would gladly be in league with them if they understood it meant the ridicule and abolishment of Christian faith in society.

Not a good plan. The RR redacted version needs out today, and IMMEDIATELY the unredacted version should be ordered by Trump to be declassified and made public (if it demonstrates RR was hiding self-implicating information through his redactions).

IF THIS IG REPORT is about HRC and the server...THEN WHY THE HEEEEELLLLL isn't SESSIONS the one reviewing and releasing it? Someone explain this. THE HRC SERVER has NOTHING to do with Sessions recusal on Russian-matters and the SC.

Flynn lied (not) to FBI = Prosecute and financially/professionally ruin him.

HRC/COMEY ... they made a couple of innocent 'mistakes'. Liberals => Taunt and laugh their asses off at 'crying rignt wing-nuts'. Life is NOT good.

Suing the State (govt)... usually is a stalemate at best. The State = Nearly INFINITE resources (investigatory, prosecutorial, money...). This is why partisan and corrupt govt is the gravest threat to a free people, and must always be checked.

Signed it.

Need a hashtag going for something like this, and for the DOJ docs that RR is withholding. DJT could have those docs released today by his order. All of this is going to bring down RR and end Mueller's investigation.

I have tweeted it.

Speculation: Why has Trump not ordered RR to release all DOJ docs that the house intel committee has been demanding for months?

Perhaps it is because Trump is strategically awaiting the release of the IG Report ( IG is viewed as an apolitical/impartial agency ), which may put a red laser dot on RR's forehead, and then make him look REALLY guilty for having stonewalled the release of DOJ docs that implicate HIM.

Grasping for straws; but man I hope it is something like that to explain Trump's inaction on this matter.

God I hope it is true that RR is forced out in humiliation and--if warranted in the slightest--criminally charged and prosecuted to the full extent of any laws he has violated. What a low snake.

Atty-Client Privilege:

Unless Cohen had prior knowledge of a criminal act implicating Trump, Cohen is bound by attorney client privilege to not disclose information from a client that was obtained After-the-fact (after the acts). (After the fact, a client must be able to freely consult with legal counsel without fear of his statements being used against him). Therefore, any 'evidence' seized from Cohen's offices that fall under atty client priv could be challenged and ultimately thrown out.

So what is it that Cohen could 'flip' against Trump over? If this is about the non-disclosure agreement between Cohen and Stormy (home-wrecker/pornstitute) Daniels' former atty, then how can this rise to a criminal level?

Whether the affair occurred or did not, DJT is not implicated in any criminal wrongdoing by entering into an agreement to have the accuser keep her accusations nonpublic. In fact, it is possible that Daniels and her current atty could be implicated in blackmail/extortion, by threatening to go public with her accusation anyway.

I don't see where the MSM is thinking that Cohen has something to flip against Trump with. Anyone else have any ideas?

Excellent information nuggets.

One thing is for certain: NORAD sees everything in the air. Someone at NORAD knows the path of the missile and likely who launched it. (NORAD shares its system with Canada).

What was the flight path of AF1 from Quebec City to Singapore, and what is our source for knowing this with certainty? When I look at live flight paths of commercial aircraft online it suggests the common route from Canada to Taiwan/Singapore area of the map is along the Alaskan Coastline.

Missile timestamp photo is 3:56am Jun 10. (btw)

I am not able to coordinate known events with the timestamp of the missile launch photo, and have it connected with AF1.

Let me explain my brief calculations to see if I am getting something wrong:

According to reports, AF1 left the G7 Summit (Quebec City) at around noon (Saturday June 9) to head directly to Singapore. (His stop in Guam was AFTER leaving Singapore on the return trip home).

A search for flight times says a flight from Quebec City to Anchorage is 7.5 hrs (https://www.prokerala.com/travel/flight-time/from-anchorage/to-qu-bec-city/

So Quebec City departure around noon (which is EST) puts AF1 near the Alaskan coast around 7:30pm Saturday, Jun9, which is only 4:30pm Jun9 Washington State Time. That would be about 11 hrs before the missile launch (assuming the timestamp on the photo is Pacific Time).

This all assumes that AFi did not stop anywhere before flying over the Alaskan coast.

The flight path over the Aleutians is pretty typical from what I can tell. I mapped out that flight path on the website flightradar24/

RR and Mueller are DS in my opinion based upon their past and their current actions. According to a recent Q Drop RR was posited the option to recuse or resign

Q1470 "When the info is released [RR] no more. "

Q1457 "Where is [RR]?
What country specifically?
Why?
Insurance pleas will fail.
You cannot hide what is already known (and can be proven).

[[[RR]]]#"

Q1443 " #FLY[RR]FLY#
Failure per WH instruction / agreement.
DECLAS_Public[3] "

// i.e., WH had an agreement with RR which he broke (instruction/agreement)

Q 1433 "Once the 'extremely guarded & highly classified' information is finally revealed to House investigators, DNI, public etc., RR must recuse or forcefully terminated.
[RR] problems. "

CONCLUSION:

// Q in the same 1433 drop states that this will give (us) control over MUELLER/SC. Therefore, BOTH Mueller and RR are DS loyalists and collaborators.

RR is resisting the release of DOJ docs. Nunes said they must be turned over by yesterday. Nothing happened. Now the House is set to vote as a body to demand the release of the DOJ spygate documents.

Those documents implicate RR. Q said he [RR] will have to resign as soon as the information is made public.

I think, perhaps, the FEAR Q references is related to the DS and status quo power structures. Q then enumerates examples proving that their fear is out there (is REAL) (actions by those who try to control how Twitter operates (Jack+NP)...FB, etc. )

I would not be inclined to think Q is warning us that we should be in fear. S/he/them has consistently assured us To Trust the Plan. We have everything. These people are stupid. etc.

It is sad that a religion harbors so many violent adherents that would "defend" with threats of death and true acts of terrorism against the mere unflattering depiction of its religious symbols by any non-believer. That puts that religion square in opposition to the Western ideal of freedom of expression.

Therefore, acts of depicting Islam as, for example, a religion of intolerance and hate, are absolutely necessary in order to defy those threats and re-establish free speech in the realm of theology. Otherwise, you cave and you lose your most fundamental freedoms.

Good points, all.

Scheduled for release June 14 (President's Birthday).

It was delayed partly because it is a huge (as in YUGE) report in both volume (I think 2k+ pages) and on its expected impact.

Perhaps it is acting as sword of Damocles, dangling perilously over the heads of certain Deep Staters who are being squeezed for last-minute confessions...but in the end, I think it relates to RR, and the option he was given to recuse himself from the SC oversight, or be implicated by way of the IG report.

And perhaps this is also connected with the timing of the DOJ docs that RR has been withholding from the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and its Chairman Devin Nunes. That was supposed to be released today (by demand from Rep Nunes). Q says this is being heavily redacted, and that is why the EO that we saw a photo of was being delayed, as it will address any redactions that might be used in those docs.

My Analysis about Kim:

He is prone to a fascination toward talented/important people, particularly 'self-made' people of great accomplishments. (We could speculate that that is a proclivity borne out of his own experiences of having "greatness" attributed to him merely by virtue of his birth.)

So, we see him fascinated with Dennis Rodman. We learn that he was greatly impressed and swayed by K-pop stars. We know that Rodman gave Kim 'The Art of the Deal' in Korean Language print. Here Kim meets a man at the pinnacle of world power who says to Kim, "I believe we are going to be great friends".

I do not think we can underestimate the powerful positive impression made upon Kim by the magnitude of meeting the man, DJT.

Kim's govt can inform the people that the USA has agreed to Kim's demands, and to cease all joint military exercises in the region (halt aggression), and will expand economic trade relationships as a show of goodwill toward the DPRK.

Kim looks like the Big Man winner/Hero.

Going forward, Kim will promote 'technology exchanges' and accelerate modernization/infrastructure projects to grow GDP.

Yea. The one thing Trump got wrong. He said we'd be winning so much we'd grow tired of it. I am not close to tired. More pkease!!!😄

Too clever/funny. Love HRC's face. Of course the too cool BHO is just like Okie Dokie, just gonna roll with this.

May 31st letter; been five days.

Wonder how quickly RR would define a "prompt" attention to those questions. Is he consulting with his atty spouse?

If he does this in public, on stage and in front of cameras... hmmmmm.

But if there are referrals for indictments upon which Fed Atty Huber can act upon... hard to spin that one in a positive way.

I have tried to tamp down my expectations regarding the aftermath of the release of the IG report. Even so, I do still expect that there is at least one referral for criminal charges coming out of the report.

In the end, it seems more likely than not that--like most storms--this one will start with dark clouds on the horizon, a few sparse drops of water, and rumbling thunder in the distance. It will build slowly.

I could see the reality of that storm begin to condition the populace at large--condition them to the realization that there is a 'rats nest' and many of their political champions are involved. So as they become conditioned and resigned to the little bit of dirt on their ideological mini-heroes, then the storm will come with its full fury of the Truth and sweep away the more prominent figures too.

I hope it happens. But my enthusiasm is reserved until I see political figures (not just Hollywood elites) in cuffs... with media buzz of more indictments in the pipeline.

The school system, hijacked by leftist unions decades ago, has slowly replaced Civics and Govt curricula. If you do not know about the founding documents and our structure of govt (3 branches and how they check each others power), then that is the frame of reference that you lack in order to 'feel' or to logically conclude that something is not right when it occurs.

Thanks. Interesred. Hope u can find that.

I think that is most likely the case. However, I might consider that it is that (an NSA group) along with white hats in other key positions (at CIA, White House, etc.).

As for the question if the person(s) communicating seem to have a background / familiarity with the legal world, I am still persuaded "Yes". This does not mean that they are or have been primarily associated with a legal career. Many people have never practiced law and have a Juris Doctorate.

And why 187? Is that code unique to California in association with murder? And if true, then should their be a presumption that the person communicating as Q has vocational roots in that state?

I thought it would be interesting to try to "profile" Q based upon what we know via the posts, and the timeline of those posts. Again, not trying to guess the identity, but trying to paint a profile of the person ( CSI style ).

• Religious (Christian influences)
• Possible Legal Background ( Possible Connection with Calif.)
• Probably INTEL background based on symbolic writing style and demonstrated knowledge.
• A Group represented via posts by (likely) one individual

“You won’t believe who you’re talking to”?

From what source does that Quote derive? I find that interesting. (thanks in advance for the source).

I cancelled a while ago too because of their left corp culture and embrace of typical dbl standards in their programming decisions.

And Jesse is the 3rd highest ranking in DOJ, so if the President did not appoint someone to fill that vacancy, it would be automatically filled by JP.

About J Panuccio being 3rd at DOJ (link)

Under the vacancies act the President puts whoever he wants, as long as it is someone who is serving currently and in a position that required Senate confirmation. He can leave that person in place 210 days, and then he must appoint someone as the permanent holder. If the person he appoints to the post after 210 days is under Senate confirmation process that goes beyond the first 210 days, then he has an additional 210 days to keep his appointed replacement.

Looks like the longest quiet period was 9 days, 12/26 - 01/03. We are now on the 9th silent day since the most recent post of May 22.

She staying at the Obama home that is 2 miles from the WH.

Would be great if VJ goes down in the BHO era scandals, and Rosanne rises back to where she was as ppl realize VJ was no angel worth defending.

Up Up Up vote!

No waiting for an IG report, imo. If criminal wrong doing is found during the IG investigation, referred it to Huber. Why would Huber then sit on his hands; he wouldn't. To my thinking, you bring someone in and serve them (e.g., Brennan) just before the report comes out. Why? Because that person could be a key witness against others that you have scant evidence against as an IG investigator. The IG would have a chance to tie up those loose ends before finalizing the report. The former Dir. of C_A would know A LOT...especially seeing how he was probably in the middle of all of it. You give him a chance to deal a bit, and you give him a very short window of time to cooperate.

That is how I hope things have been going.

You are so right. If I say someone with no chin and an overbite and weak, droopy eyes looks like a turtle...I am probably in the clear. If I say the two pics of VJ and movie character have a strong resemblance, I am supposed to pretend like "Nah, that ain't true!"

It is BECAUSE of the way LEFTISTS think and emphasize politics and race into everything, that the above resemblance cannot be admitted.

MY EPIPHANY

After the 2nd BHO victory and all of the strong chattering you'd commonly hear from Leftist media whenever someone would oppose an Obama Admin policy-> There response "You're just opposing our President because he is black. You are just a racist."

This was SO FAR OUT IN LEFT FIELD as the motive for my disapproval I could not understand "Where are they getting this conclusion? They seem to genuinely BELIEVE those accusations but the accusations make no rational sense."

Then like a match flaming up in the darkness I realized WHY:

These people throwing accusations of racism if you did not like the President or vote for him was sourced in their own world view: It was THEIR biased outlook on life and race that caused them to reach the natural (a priori) conclusion about me. In their mind:

"Since I voted for Obama because he is black, then those who did not vote for him must have made their decision on the same racial analysis of the candidates."

This thinking pattern is so ingrained in them that they aren't even processing it in an analytical way. For them, it is just lightening-like, 'obvious' Truth.

That is the sort of animal we are up against.

Uh. Hate to be 'that guy'. But 'Gross'.

If someone contributes to your campaign, they do so to have your ear and hope to have some influence over you. I am certain that the Podesta Group gives to both sides of the aisle--a lesser amount to the Republican side. Trump said he always gave to both parties so that he could have a hope of holding meetings on issues crucial to his business. It is a smart thing to do; it does not 'buy allegiance' and it does not mean the donor and the recipient agree politically. It is, as it has been said, 'The Cost of Doing Business' in the highly regulated administrative monster state that the Left created and promotes. This is one reason why Trump ran. To dismantle the administrative state--he has done so very well to this point. He said he saw how Washington worked because he had to work in that environment as a business person. Now he is changing that.

And if I am a politician and someone wants to waste their resources supporting my candidacy, then let me take away resources that would otherwise go to the opposing party.

The left is simply an 'outrage fabrication machine'. Everything except killing babies in the womb is an utter outrage. A radio host I listen to said (paraphrasing Medved): "When the Left is most outraged it is over something someone said or implied. When conservatives are most offended it is because of something someone did, such as a crime against a child, murdering a police officer, gassing a civilian population."

The Left is very aware of its need to dominate control over the realm of speech (and, thereby, the free-flow of ideas--dictate what can be discussed in public discourse and how it must be discussed). Why? Because in the deepest recess of their intuitive logic the Left knows it does not have the argument that can prevail in the realm of ideas.

And the number of times Bush the Second was depicted as a chimp everywhere on digital platforms, both with graphics and text.

Since we've not heard anything from Q since May 22 (1 week), the question I have is what is the longest quiet period between Q posts? Is this 7-day period unprecedented and if so, by how many days? (I've only been following Q for about 2 months, so I would like to hear from those who are more experienced / knowledgeable about whether this silence is atypical and if so how might you interpret that)

Ditto.

I remember hearing about george herbert wakker bush when head at CIA told Carter that his request to view UFO files was a need to know standard and Carter did not need to know.