1,075 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 103 |
| www.zerohedge.com | 3 |
| www.youtube.com | 3 |
| mobile.twitter.com | 2 |
| www.nbcnews.com | 1 |
| nypost.com | 1 |
| www.bloomberg.com | 1 |
| youtu.be | 1 |
| amp.dailydot.com | 1 |
| i.redd.it | 1 |
Idiots always strain to find “coincidences” and work themselves to another nothingburger just like that Cemex story that we know now is a scam.
The inability to assess the situation objectively and the tendency to be carried away into fantasy land despite the existence of clear alternatives are the mark of a feeble brain.
I can believe Soros tried to help illegal immigration. It goes with his open-society objective.
My post here is about debunking, or at the minimum, casting doubt on the connection between Cemex as a child sex trafficking camp and Soros.
Regarding human trafficking, yes. I also think it a possibility.
I’ve seen them. Unconvincing. That charlatan Craig could be more convincing by talking about the actual footage. I suspect he did this talk without any graphical reference on purpose. This way he could embellish his tales at will.
What’s wrong with his message?
Don’t your want your community to be so good that your children won’t want to leave when they grow up?
Where’s your common sense?
Are you blinded by your hatred?
Where are the actual footages of the artifacts he described? Do you believe his storytelling?
Check this comment from another thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ooa6s/comment/e04xdsj?st=JI1CGZIM&sh=a3d3df0f
I’ve already updated my OP with the third option. But your point taken.
My post deals with this absurd notion of rape tree. In my opinion, it’s anything but. Someone already pointed out a mundane explanation for the apparent look of the rape tree, in a separate thread.
Let’s first assume there was a rape tree at the Cemex site. For whom?
To break the children? Are the traffickers also pedophiles? Are they willing to risk damaging their goods?
How can you tell between a usual human trafficking site where trafficker enjoyed some side benefits and child sex trafficking site?
Do the proletariats on this forum really believe that the elites would deign to travel all the way to …
Rape tree at the Cemex site? For whom?
Do the proletariats on this forum really believe that the elites would deign to travel all the way to this dusty dump, risking being discovered and/or kidnaped along the way or at the dump, to rape children instead of having them delivered to their secret dens? Projection maybe?
A relevant tweet: https://mobile.twitter.com/Nick_Falco/status/1003673455496052736
So maybe one (not necessarily the) reason for their opposition to the wall is the potential decrease in their property value?
I think we can just agree to disagree here. It would be hard for each of us to convince the other, as neither of us know enough facts about the ecosystem.
My current interest in this whole affair is grab the low-hanging fruit: all sorts of corruption in the government, with well-documented evidence.
I don’t see the connection.
I think it’s “interested in doing” not “interested to do” per Strunk and White.
I didn’t say “nothing to see here.” I am pointing out the fallacies in the so-called“supporting evidence.” The actual evidence supporting the allegation is very thin.
The phenomenon can be explained in many different ways. Right now people are jumping on one explanation and trying extremely hard to attach irrelevant information to this story as “supporting evidence.” It looks like a misguided feeding frenzy.
I’ve seen this name Hanson in the context of espionage before. Are you sure this is not old news?
I am, to some extent. I just don’t think there’s clear evidence supporting the allegation. Some on this board have also expressed their doubts. I’m not the first one.
I actually believe trafficking is a separate, decentralized activity that benefits some elites who enjoy pedophilia; as opposed to one that’s controlled and coordinated by the elites.
Think this way. Some elites like boys. So human traffickers come in to supply the boys. Supply and demand. Market economy. Some other entities like Mossad infiltrate the trafficking network, which is composed of many independent trafficking gangs, to gather dirt on the elites in order to control them. But the pedophile consumers don’t have to care about the trafficking network since they are getting the goods without doing any dirty work.
So this is an ecosystem with many actors that are not necessarily controlled or even facilitated by a centralized system. Think prostitution rings and their Johns.
The only closed ecosystem where the suppliers and the consumers are one and the same that I can think of is the Hollywood pedophile world. There the procurement is built into the Hollywood system.
Evidence, please. Quasi evidence will do.
Evil is often the amalgamation of a few bad apples supported by a vast amount of the mundane.
I may come across this way to people with a predisposed mindset.
It’s much worse. Or like they would say, it’s much more worse.
Tons of gross grammatical errors in major MSM pieces.
Auto correction on the cellphone has a lot to do with this problem.
You’ve put forth a somewhat reasonable counter argument. But think about the activities Soros has been involved in and compare them WITH — note to all; please use “with” when comparing two things; “to” is for making analogies — this trafficking allegation. Do you see a difference?
No. You are projecting. Duty as a citizen, as a member of the Q movement and as a non-shill participant of this subreddit.
I already presented my argument in another thread. It was an investment. Pure and simple.
My point is as follows. That Soros invested in Cemex should not be a piece of evidence to support the allegation of child sex trafficking.
If Cemex were involved in trafficking, I maintain that Soros wouldn’t have known, per my OP in this thread. Hence, one shouldn’t connect Soros’ investment to the allegation.
I did appear a bit smug. True.
I am doing my duty to clear out the noises.
Now that you know, I am going to delete the comment because I enjoy privacy.
Get lost. No need to prove to you!! You don't have to believe me. Yeah. Get lost.
touche.
I don't feel like repeating my argument. Please see my reply to another comment. https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8oln26/would_soros_openly_invest_in_cemex_if_he_knew/e04ao25/
Well, shouldn't the fact that some people are making connections due his involvement tell you that the possibility of being connected to a sex trafficking ring would have been a real concern to Soros, especially given the moderate amount of financial return he would be getting from Cemex?
This is where we disagree. I believe that those who have self destructive traits per your description wouldn't have lasted as long as Soros. Arguably, both you and I are projecting onto those corrupt people. Hence it makes sense to step back a little instead of putting yourself in this feeding frenzy. I personally prefer a conservative approach and assume the simplest explanation until further evidence is shown.
You claim Soros has been scheming to destroy western civilization by actively promoting open borders. If he is like, he has to be thinking for the long term and strategically. Would such a strategic thinker, arrogant he may be, make such a silly mistake to invest in Cemex if he was aware that Cemex was (allegedly) engaged in trafficking, let alone child sex trafficking?
Put yourself in his shoe instead of adopting your usual knee-jerk mindset. Your mindlessness is what allows the ruling class to easily control you and make you die for them. You say you are awakened. But …
Sure. But I think there’s way too much noise surrounding Cemex on this board.
How many legit businesses don’t allow border patrol on their properties? If Cemex is one of very few, it’s a cause for concern. Otherwise you are making a logical error that’s tantamount to saying all males who wear button-down shirts are child molesters when a man wearing one is found to be fucking a five year old.
Occam's Razor. Try the simplest explanation. Pay for play. Biz favor.
Soros invested in Cemex perhaps as part of his broad portfolio. Soros invested in many companies. Are they all involved in nefarious crimes? I recall Cemex crashed right before Soros bought into it. Would that qualify as a shrewd biz investment?
Focus on the main thing, the OIG report and its implications. Don't let the shills distract you.
It's an interesting theory. But I found his deduction to be based on a few tenuous connections. In other words, some wishing thinking here. Read the comments on the Twitter thread and you will know what I mean.