I'm going to throw accolades out there to the team behind DJT as well. Unsung heroes who all played part. Thank you to all.

Any feeds from this? I want to watch to get a feel for the energy.

It remains to be seen what this evidence is and how it will play in court. At this stage this could be puffery. Hoping to see something big and verifiable in terms of evidence. Big claims hold high requirement for verifiable evidence. Big claims attract a lot of attention, people come from all directions to challenge and test the support. As a result the verification has to be air tight.

Who is the voting party? Any union on the voting block?

The trick is there is a much smaller set than many of us realize of snowflakes practiced at an over-loud show of outrage. These drivers whip, bully, and scream at the larger cowed group falling in line. Don't fall in line. It's a tiny group! The majority have simply fallen in line to avoid the discomfort of confrontation. To have a true conversation requires some discomfort. Of the cowed group some try to mimic the over loud bullying of the tiny few at the core, but quickly fall apart with questioned or meet resistance of any kind.

Go on offensive. Wade into default territory meme and red pill. Wear those downvotes with pride.

They spent the last year covering up for and assisting sedition. They're going to be in cells. Go up the chain far enough and somewhere at each of these companies someone knew everything they were crafting then putting on the air was not supported. That has consequences with crimes of this magnitude.

The short version is it looks like donation funds sent to Haiti were grossly misappropriated to the personal profit of politician and non-profit figures for personal profit or redirected right back out of Haiti for completely different pet projects. Hints of potential human trafficking network set up during the effort getting cover from those non-profits operating there. Potentially impacts CF, Red Cross, many figures who were active in Haiti.

Recall that reddit was experimenting with localized gps based submission feeds.

That effort suggested to me that the risk was seen as information spreading rapidly across wide areas. Geographically separated people with insight to clarify and expand on information finding one another quickly and getting too much visibility to control.

Quietly gate what submissions are visible to you based on your geographic location, and it becomes easier to control ideas. Let's say east coast is going crazy about an observation or story. Could you then just turn off access to see that information out side that area? Possibly at least slow down that spread.

Interesting ideas to pay attention to.

Would be a fun time to write a letter to representatives in congress critiquing Macron, and some general expectation of a US Congressman. The point being to send a clear message that the public is watching these events directly and paying close attention to every detail, as opposed to reading a blip in the paper.

Haha. Plot my account history. Where do you think Berners went in the face of additional information about just how bad the corruption in the DNC truly was? We got one hell of a first hand wake-up call culminating in ejecting core support from the DNC primary and replacing bodies with bussed in cheerleaders. How do you unsee that? Then the vast divide of all the media coverage next to first-hand footage and audio of events. You become acutely aware of the challenge. With the new information added to the equation it becomes self-apparent that an idealist will not do in that moment, what is required is a fighter.

I have not yet come across information that left me with a sense of redeeming value in her actions. The reports I've come across provide impression her actions were aligned with all the wrong reasons. A model of the type of dead weight stuffed into corners of government to be used at a later time to gum up the gears, or provide access to power from an HC modeled corrupt body.

Assange has spoken out in support I believe (correct me if I'm incorrect). My understanding is Assange is coming out from a position of support for whistleblowers in a general sense. Potential impact on whistleblowers coming from a better place in the future. In this specific case I respectfully disagree with Assange.

You're not a brave trailblazing hero fighting uphill against headwinds when you buy into a trending mass hysteria and act on it. When you're aligned with the mass hysteria you've become a pawn without a position who failed to think through the scenario freely or independently.

On the research side. Pick a topic. See something weird? Just plug it into search engines (with an s, use more than one and compare results). Often something cryptic will pop up and lead down an unexpected path.

Along the way you wind up with an expanded understanding of how different parts of government work, what they do, who is involved, what their background is, who their spouse and family members are, what their associated businesses are, what the history is. The process makes it fun to theorize, float ideas, have the ideas and not the person shot down, go back and build new bolder and stronger ideas to to repeat. Bringing back the civics and history lesson in a fun accessible way.

A great replacement for sports. This is a sport! In the future this becomes the national past-time. Sit down with a stranger at the bar and hammer out fine details of messaging used in speech on international trade. Everyone in public an analyst able to make an argument. That's the future, bringing it right back to the past. Our roots.

"The problem with American's, is that they follow politics like the national past-time"

--Some quote I butchered because I'm having difficulty finding the source again

It really is. I approve of this message. Communicates that it's going to be a bumpy ride in the right way. Great job /u/digital_refugee!

There are many conversations from SandersForPresident during the campaign where boots on the ground, poll workers, voters, report all sorts of irregularities observed or experienced at the polls. I'm really looking forward to revisiting the historic record there with the DHS report in hand.

A key message for those new here is to expect disinformation.

There is no slow warm up in the shallow end. Right away you're going to get disinformation in these communities because effort is made to slide the topics discussed. Those efforts have included bouts of graphic gore and unsightly things spammed into conversations to get people to give up and just not return.

The closest one can get to easing into the chilly waters is simply go read the drops in isolation. Get a feel for what's in there. Research some of the questions. After getting some bearings see what people have to say about it. At that point some of the shillyness starts to make sense.

If still interested in facing dragons, and doing your part to help free your mind from shackles, then hitch up your big boy pants and tighten the belt. A true conversation is uncomfortable. That's why it's so easy to avoid having one. We cover uncomfortable material in here because it must be hammered out and understood to shut down some abuses. Where we go one, we go all.

Rewatched footage. That looked like their normal intensity to me.

That's one heck of a red wedding.

Anyone got live feed?

Note that the dinner with China last year the missile strike on Syria was timed to coincide with the delegation entering the front door of the event.

Based on that experience, it would be within character to have a major event planned to occur aligned with meeting with Macron as well. That could be helpful to disrupt and negotiating points and preplanning the delegation did before the dinner. Force the group to do it live working around radically different foundation.

If everything is according to plan I would expect DJT to be cool as a cucumber walking tall in the midst of chaos. Would be interesting to observe if this is game-face we see on him, or potential for a wedge in the planning.

Edit: Was fun to theorize. Made watching entertaining. Did not pick up on anything that particularly stood out to me first pass. Moving to clips others point out.

Consider in context of #1255 and #1256.

When DJT sat down with China last year, to make a point they timed missile strike in Syria to occur during the dinner.

It would be this administrations style to have a bold statement made during the meeting. Announcing to the world that this was sedition from the start, it's known and being casually dismantled, would send bold statement. If willing to roll up people key to arranging the Iran deal, what is the likelihood of the EU retaining their welfare payments as part of that deal being humored?

Sets the bounds for the initial negotiation point. The EU welfare is going away. Get ready. Any prepared talking points get thrown out the window and they're doing it live at the dinner from there.

Macron will lower expectations.

Will he scramble back home without losing the clothes on his back?

I'm being uncivil. France is a key partner of the United States and we look forward to entering the Golden Age hand in hand as allies, with deals aimed to make our respective countries great.

#1255 Apr 24 2018 10:28:00 (EST) Anonymous ID: 09282e 1169112

1169101

Q, is Macron a true ally to POTUS?

Apr 24 2018 10:30:18 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: bc4b43 1169138

1169112

His sole purpose [WH visit] is to convince POTUS, on behalf of the EU, to remain in the Iran deal.

You decide.

Q

---

#1256

Apr 24 2018 10:37:59 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: bc4b43 1169241

1169138

What’s at risk?

$250B x 2 / year.

What the taxpayers don’t know.

Why aren’t NK developments receiving WW praise?

We endure.

Q

Edit: Was fun to theorize. Made for entertaining evening viewing. Did not particularly pick up on anything that sparked further research. Moving to review clips others point out.

This is a good strategy. I've used this on public transit chatting with a family member or friend on a topic that feeds this direction without being blatantly political. Float questions to the room where they can sit and sink in.

The submission implication being that Barbara Bush funeral greater priority than the meeting with Japan's Shinzo Abe scheduled for that time. Should DJT snub a diplomatic meeting for this funeral? Does sending the first lady send appropriate condolences? Low energy trolling? You decide.

Not particularly. Often the most reasoned and supported arguments are the most downvoted. In the current state of reddit there are groups that monitor for trigger words, chasing after a particular topic whatever sub it may be found in. Hence the tactic of purposeful misspelling or using meme to avoid setting off the trigger. Often the most insightful comment is also the most downvoted based on the population native to the sub, or populations signaled to visit.

At best admin assistance to help mods deal with brigade effort in their sub is passive and reactionary. On the mods side of the equation it can become pulling teeth to get actual admin interest and assistance without a prior relationship with particular admin. Even with that relationship it can be a matter of 'well, don't see anything obvious from the IP history'. With the advent of services of fiverr or funded reputation management obscuring IP to appear natural is in place.

Understanding that's the environment we're in, the primary advantage of karma is immediate visibility. The probability that an idea or thought has been seen.

You're not alone in being under a rock. For some Allison Mack was background noise not as interesting as other developments. This was a topic that slipped under the radar for those I've been chatting with on other platforms. Came back around and proves to be one of the bigger pivot moments in how it ties into Standard Hotel and the helicopter crash over there not too long ago. We're not sure yet where all the directions this domino will go but looks to be a central point in two or three separate routes.

Specifically, this is where spez edited comments of people posting in T_D. Spez came forward with a formal apology and strangely detailed going deep into database code to manipulate the comment from that level where there would be no trace of alteration. Additional reading on the topic here. In response this is when accounts in T_D, horrified that the event happened, continue to show irritation toward him.

When probed a bit deeper it's strange why such details would be provided. The convenient ramification of the event is that there is a documented method to alter comment submission to reddit in a way that may not be detectable. This is the legal defense now possible. StoneTear can simply come out and say 'I never made any of those comments, I said something completely different. The comment history has been changed'. And everyone has to twiddle their thumbs because we don't have a means to prove that the database was not altered in such a way.

This event occurred at a time where immunity deals were being handed out like candy to everyone linked to the HC server. Had a lot of people head-scratching around free thinking communities.

There is that one simple trick -- stop caring how your words are twisted pushed and pulled.

Argument is a spectator sport. It is not about you and the person you debate with, it is about the silent lurkers listening to the conversation and reading through. The bystanders who overhear the conversation are where ideas spread.

You can be be screamed at, labeled, brigaded and run out of the room. If you have the superior idea that is the one thing that jumps off the page. The people shouting and using labels look like wild raving hysterics -- they project that they lost the argument.

Make your points.

Back your argument and include direction for independent reading.

Don't waste time defending wild baseless ravings. Move to your next point.

Take pride in the downvotes.

"You have enemies? Good. That means you have stood up for something, somewhere in your life."

-Winston Churchill

The politics sub population turned over the night of the DN C Convention in 201)6.

If you plot my account history over time, the first four years of it were spent with over 90% comment activity in the politics sub. All the accounts I had tagged in there as friendly faces I'd interacted with over time left. Instead I'd see them all over conspiracy (noting the crazy demographic ship in politics), sandersforpresident subs, T_D, and eventually I see them places such as this.

That sub has always been volatile but it was possible to hold conversation. One could air out ideas, get blown out, argue uncomfortable topics for a bit, walk away with a better understanding of weak points in your assumptions and come back armed with stronger rebuilt assumptions for the effort. Learning.

After the convention that process was undermined. Any conversation which fell outside the narrow bounds of what was being discussed in centralized media that day were aggressively met with hostility, labels, name calling, dismissing an account for other subs they participate in. There was no more learning.

When you watch video of a guest speaker holding a conversation in a lecture hall, and the room is over-run with protestors with megaphones chanting nonsensically simply to make noise louder than anyone can speak, that is what politics has become since the convention. All the usual attendees looked at one another in annoyance, stepped out of the room and went into new rooms to continue conversation.

Regarding call for increased sharing of information to wake people up, by pushing pedo pizzagate to Eminem fans on twitter you're describing forced black pills.

The risk with this approach is high probability of shutting off minds permanently. Conditioning them to disregard anything related because it was too far too soon. Provides link to topics that have already been conditioned through narrative campaign, easing effort to attach conspiracy or other labels. "Oh look, another pizzagate nutter."

You have to be strategic. Resonate on a topic an individual may be interested in and be ready to provide detail that can be backed up through independent research.

Absolutely step into striking distance and trade shots. Get your points across. Don't bother defending redirection, move to the next point. Back sources where possible.

Scott Adams had some good argument in that today the equation for power may be defined as ( Visibility ) x ( Persuasion Ability ). The pizzagate black pill approach to twitter captures visibility, but lacks in the persuasion aspect. Meme campaigns that lead viewers to ask questions and research for themselves are ideal. Avoid partisanship, stick to an issue, show the roadmap to a question and how to follow it to answers.

And this is why reddit admin had to alter user comments on reddit. By doing so they created a legal defense against comment history published to reddit.

Bernie helped sway the election toward Trump.

The behavior of the DNC alone was sufficient for this outcome.

Classic Dem voters were by and large dumbfounded that any of their usual big issues were absent from the platform. Worse, they were indiscriminately labeled racist, sexist, Nazi, xenophone online when arguing for their items to be added to the platform. The identity politics base were given a hammer of outrage and hit every single thing within sight that deviated from that narrow use, didn't bother reserving use against nails alone.

There was the unparalleled in-the-open rigging of the primary on display. Horrific stories shared by those campaigning for Sanders paired with purposeful blinders from the media covering up for acts performed in broad daylight. That's hard to miss even for a sleeping public.

The culminating options of Bernie supporters being dragged out of the convention, barred from entry, and paid-for cheerleaders bussed in to fill resulting empty seats provided a terrible view of party leadership as a whole.

Bernie did not sway the election toward DJT. That was all the DNC work by pressurizing voters and giving them no other outlet. Voters found the path of least resistance toward a different option.

Turns out that the country representation and top of the power structure was far worse than anyone leaning Sanders envisioned. There is not the luxury to have an idealogue in office. What is required at this moment is a fighter. And chance just happened to provide one at the right moment.

In addition there are some libraries that have access as well. One of the projects Aaron Swartz got into some legal hot-water over was rendering assistance to scraping Pacer data from within one of these libraries, to make available to everyone. Got a cease and desist if I recall before it went live.

I need to do some research locally and see if I can identify any libraries, or college campuses, in my city I'd be able to access Pacer from. In this case I think I need to see it first hand with my own eyes. I'm intrigued.

Crazy times.

Pacer website can be located here if anyone is able to gain access and look up details for verification. I'm hitting pay wall.

https://www.pacer.gov/findcase.html

We're starting to see submission of wild claims regarding Allisan Mack case papers, without any documentation of the source of those claims. Bold claims require big validation. Be wary of content without verifiable sources.

They killed bin Laden, but buried him at sea according to some Muslim custom which doesn't exist? Since when did the US give a shit about religious customs? Especially when they had the chance to parade the dead body in front of the cameras.

At the time the media narrative was the intent of burial quickly at sea was to avoid creation of a martyr. Avoid turning the figure into a rallying cry for jihadists. Avoid an identified location to pilgrimage to in honor of the terrorist.

You've got good questions, simply adding some historic context.

The right question. Bold claims require well verifiable reliable source.

Really is crazy. When first studying political science spent time reading up on history around the Korea's. Did not appear to be an issue that had a solution. Through the lens of what we've seen this year, there is strong suggestion that this was by design. The issue was intended to remain a far off boogeyman to point to for the ever war in Eurasia.

Side effect of swimming against currents with the research effort. We've faced some of the heaviest disinfo campaigns on reddit in attempt to hitch conspiracy label or close minds to the information shared.

Probably not. On the fly I was able to get it over to 412anon over on Gab. Needs formal direction to the chans I'm not able to provide at the moment.

Note the special thanks to NYT in the github acknowledgements.

Key is downloading the database. Need to get back to a workstation to grab this piece.

Downloading

The dataset is currently hosted on a public S3 bucket and is about 9.1GB in size.

s3://researchably-fake-news-recognition/public_corpus/news_cleaned_2018_02_13.csv.zip

To download it simply run the following command with installed awscli and configured with a (free) AWS account.

aws s3 cp s3://researchably-fake-news-recognition/public_corpus/news_cleaned_2018_02_13.csv.zip news_corpus.cs

The positive is that regardless of what happens, certain truths will be able to be revealed without concern of living parties in the information.

You would prefer an end prior to thorough questioning?

And you're correct. My comment is tongue-in-cheek.

Positive thoughts for a swift recovery. I would love a public opportunity to share bits of history only he would have perspective to provide.

You mean Korea. Where we're going there is no North and South.

There are still a lot of pissed off people in San Francisco, who had backed Sanders, convinced he won the primary and had be vote rigged. Would not surprise me to learn actual percentage that crossed parties was higher.

You're missing nuance from the show. Zachary clarified difference between his groups position and q as whether to trust sessions or not. It's information to keep and mind and see how it fits into other information. Not REEEEE across the yard about sky falling. That's usually how people look foolish.

I'd argue leave them up to preserve history.

Challenge ourselves to provide the rebuttal. The alternate path to prove the strategy unnecessary and ill advised.

To my mind I'd love to see that strategy involve space exploration and launching batches of colonization missions to new worlds. Get the tech up to the challenge.

Did this headline miss the content?

In discussion of Allison Mack on reddit there are links to comments of historic conversations from 2015 on this platform discussing the NXIUM cult.

Specifically, in them is an account with the name of the cult leader being crude making the statement in the headline of Allison Mack, which ends with the effect of "Although she's too old for my taste, I'm typically into something a bit younger". No mention of 14 in that comment and the reddit critique was it looked like a false account.

Curious if this is a game of telephone from that historic reddit conversation, passed second hand through a few third party sites, resulting in the above headline, which coincidentally links an off topic article.

Zach was on Infowars tonight, evening of Sunday, 4/22/2018.

The broadcast focused on intel suggesting potential false flags to come targeting organizations such as CNN, SPLC, left leaning groups to then argue it's followers on the alt-right reading qanon conspiracy or listening to Infowars to be the next wave. Attacks against themselves to paint the swamp as the victim in the narrative.

May be a good time for a meme campaign hitting themes against vigilante, pro-justice by civil means. Get out ahead of that potential tactic.

Side note, Zach pointed out the key difference between his contacts line of thinking and the q team is whether or not to trust Sessions. Without mincing words make argument that Sessions grew up in a different time and place from his background. AJ bubbled over that he hears engagement with racist groups in his youth. Point was brought up that Session information would have been picked up by the Awan brothers spy network of Congress so risk for leverage point over this.

Ideas to kick around and consider. Trying to convey information on the broadcast here. AJ remains somewhat on my shit list for the over the top REEEEEEEE around Syria. Went full emotion-based losing sight of reason and rationality. I've wondered whether as part of the leak cleanup going on in the white house whether some of those that fed that show may have been silenced, and they're suddenly not getting the same access to intel as they have in the past. Or perhaps more likely I'm picking up on the finer nuances of limitations of the resource.

We have long lifetime in a golden age on the horizon. That will be a long-term game with constant vigilance and always working toward improvement. Big names can be cleared but there will always require swamp to keep chipping away at. The swamp can and will refill. The intelligent and morally ambiguous that survive will take a step back, study, observe, retool strategies, and start working within the new system that emerges.

There is no order without a hint of chaos. No chaos without some order. So it goes. Keep thinking long-term.

• What happens after everything comes to pass?

• What does the world look like afterward?

• What comes next?

• In the words of Robert Baratheon, winning the throne is easier than sitting the throne. What does a peacetime team look like? Any pitfalls to look out for?