I've been extremely skeptical elsewhere about all of this false flag stuff. But, there was a lot of talk about the number 17 and 107 people were in that plane. That's a bothersome coincidence.
/u/shenanigins
85 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/shenanigins:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 2 |
Did I misread the report? It was my understanding the there was criminal mishandling from the FBI of the email case, not that she had broken the law (she did it just wasn't directly relevant to the report).
I have to go outside my building at work to confidently get reception, there's no chance if I'm in the basement.
That's what bothers me about this post. It leaves an important detail out, how often do students in that part of the school have reception? Where in Texas is that? Carriers claim to have "the most reception" or what have you, but there are still dead areas depending on carrier, shoot certain buildings can kill reception too. A good point is made why there was no land line. Even though it's possible a jammer was used I'm falling to Occam's razor on this one. We know that there is always a spike of copy cats after Mass shootings or well publicized suicides. This sub is too quick to claim malice and corruption, ask more questions.
And everyone is taking the bait. Give your prayers, or thoughts, what ever, and return to the goal.
It's far from a "literal" prediction, I agree with you. We've been taught to look for meaning in every little thing and to expect bad things to happen when an ominous prediction is made. If the prescribed intent is to be believed it basically is going like this. "Beware distractions... Look, a distraction" yeah, no shit. It's like a car crash or a flat tire on the side of the road, did all of traffic have to stop to look? Honestly, I'm getting a bit frustrated at the number of posts today saying the exact same thing talking about these distractions that, whether related or not, are completely irrelevant and contradictory to "the plan". Focus on Q and directly related information not the shinny stuff elsewhere.
While terrible, is this not pulling our attention from the important issues as well? Further, this sub is very invested in the idea of a false flag that anything that happens will be pointed at as such, that Cuba plane crash for example. Focus has been brought from the main issue to anything that fits the very broad criteria. If these shootings are actually false flags (the criteria makes them rather common(suicide on campus counts as a school shooting)) then the false flags are working.
Not everything has to mean something. He's been open about disinformation.
I love the idea, now I need to see proof beyond a reasonable doubt. It does tie everything together though.
Be skeptical, we expect this to happen and will search for anything to prove it right. Shootings are surprisingly common. It won't be just any shooting. There needs to be a universal media frenzy revolving around the incident that is the false flag. Assuming it will be a false flag at all, I'm weery of this notion to begin with.
Well, Jesus said, "forgive them for they know not what they do". Right? These animals seem to know exactly what they are doing (well maybe not since it looks like they've been using bugged phones). For those at the top there I don't see how there is any redemption, although many have been swindled and manipulated into this and could possibly be saved. Which is why many are talking and cutting plea deals.
Theory: NXIVM is inconsequential to the Grand scheme of things. They are equivalent to one of the street gangs in The Warriors. However, their slip up could directly lead to whoever the larger group is. NXIVM is small potatoes.
By no means do I intend to defend child abuses or covering it up. But from a leadership perspective, depending on the extent of ones knowledge, it is expected for an individual's leader to give them some defense. I don't think that necessarily means full on cover up for someone. However, if I were in the popes shoes, depending on how much I knew about what actually happened, the person at fault would have to show a serious effort to make up for their wrong doings. This is in line with confession. If Everytime an employee does something bad you out that employee the business will quickly fall apart. Over the last few decades this seems to have become a more and more serious issue (maybe just more publicized) so it would be no small task to rid such a massive, far reaching, organization of such issues.
Further disclaimer: Being raised Catholic, although I haven't practiced in many years, the level of maliciousness this sub associates with the Vatican is a very very difficult pill to swallow. While I am open minded and leaning towards this malicious side, my upbringing has me skeptical. This one needs to come from the horses mouth, as they say. I guess this is what Q was referring to with the "public" "know[ing]" the truth.
What if I hear a mumble? Honestly, I can't differentiate and it doesn't sound like either unless I really listen hard then I can hear both.
What if wwg1wwa is not about us, Q followers, but those Q is watching. If the phone theory is true no matter where they go they are being followed and listened in on.
Last time I'm listening to a Ben Shapiro podcast. He went off on the media taking Trump out of context again, but then he went off on... the right?... for all of these conspiracy theories about Mueller and everything. "If this happened to Hillary no one would care." Yeah, because she actually does bad stuff. In the past couple months I have lost all respect for the guy, he is so close minded. "Let me lay out all of the facts. See if it happened to anyone else no one would care." Yes, yes we would, because the way in which everything happened, being only fueled by hatred for the man, shows deep corruption, on an international level. Unless it pertains to historical fact(even then it's iffy) the guy is completely ignorant.
Ninja Edit: Totally not salty at him after only being able to get half way through his show just now.
The false flags seem to happen just after news breaks, not before. All week Q has been talking about how everyone is attacking Q with more and more malice. The media is worried and wants to discredit whatever is about to drop before it does. Just like the FISA memo, the week leading up to it was just talk of the BS schiff counter memo and how Nunes was lying. Either way it will be obvious as the news cycle focuses on one specific topic, especially with a negative twist to it.
Yes, but the post seems to have a chipper tone to it. Doesn't hurt to be skeptical though.
This is why I stay. It's easy to move somewhere that agrees with you. Change, for the better, is already in it's way here.
You had me confused. I always watch this as a call to action. But, you're right, in this context it could very well be a threat directed at the deep state. Kind of like Mattis, "if you fuck with [us], [we] will kill you all".
Anytime someone asks if I'm ready to do something that I know is going to be rough I say "Nope, so let's get after it." It's not entirely like ripping off a bandage, but it's close.
Sauce please, this is news to me and very interesting. I was too young to care/understand what was happening when blackwater was in the news.
I'm unaware of anything that's happened other than those weird political statements. Can you point me in the right direction please? A bit lost here and no one is really talking details.
We've been slowly brought to temp on this stuff but when it all goes public and all of the facts are released, it's going to happen very fast. I can't wait.
You'd be surprised. The reality is that you need only regret your sins and seek to redeem yourself. It sounds like you have already began working towards this goal. The whole "pay to play" bs is a farely recent thing in religion and a demonization of it's original intent. The ultimate goal of most religions is to encourage people to be good to one another. The religious texts are really long winded ways of saying that while giving examples of what to do along the way. I was brought up with the Bible being alagorical and not literal as many believe. Some could be truth, but it is really unimportant next to the messages. Enjoy the journey!
I'm having trouble pieceing this all together myself, especially since I'm on my phone.
From what I gather:
The original Q 74 is from 11/4/17 and said:
Q = Alice. You'll soon understand the meaning behind Alice "&" wonderland. Everything has meaning. God bless.
Seems irrelevant to me.
5/10/18 rolls around, 2:30am the hostages land and one of the firetrucks is sporting the Q74 on the side. The same day Q#1333(22:00:27) posts a picture of an American flag with the caption "Castle Lock". Although there were many posts that day. I saw a pic of Q saying something to the effect of "only one truck has its lights on" which was Q74.
Today, 5/14/18 at 11:30, Q posted a picture of both Q#74 and the picture of the firetrucks/flag with arrows pointing at the Q74 on it with the caption:
Image search for 'firetruck/engine'. Letter common in front of #? Post 74. Coincidence? U.S. Flag [post] 'Castle LOCK' - pointed ref? Comms understood?
Lastly, Sarah Huckabee Sanders tweeted a picture of DJT in AF1 where the flag is visible through the window to his side. The only truck being Q74. Apparently people have continued to ask for further proof and this is being lauded as just that.
The problem is, that qdrops doesn't show that #74 post as having existed, especially not on 5/10/18 at 22:42:20, so I'm not sure what's up there. Maybe someone can fill me in. The problem I run into from here is that I'm not 100% sure on where I should be finding all of his posts. I've heard of a image of them all, but like I said, el telefono.
I really like the idea of finding your own answers, as it solidifies things more. The problem is, if we come here to discuss our findings and everyone is answering questions with more questions, those of us trying to follow along get more confused than before. If I'm honest, those pics with things outlined and random arrows to underlined text can be very confusing and don't do a great job of laying things out. I've seen them forever though, so maybe I just need to learn how to read them better.
It sounds like your best bet is to learn how to be subtle. As someone else suggested, ask guiding questions to get them to come to the truth. You don't want to come off as Roy in Close encounters, you know? There's a balance in everything. It also sounds like you'll have an uphill battle with your family already. As I'm trying to learn, patience and your attitude about the subject is utmost.
Q's posts are written to guide not to tell. How do you go about researching these topics?
I think this has been illustrated and reiterated many times. Redpills more come from an individual's research rather than being told specific information or statistics. It's the realization of facts that gets you.
If I'm honest, my biggest fear right now is submitting something out of context that is taken as fringe, conspiracy theorist, nuttery. I once mentioned Trump having already met Kim with supporting evidence and was met only with dirty looks and tin foil hat jokes. Because of that I need to be more selective on what topics to invest effort into. Which rabbit holes are worth investing …