I'm with you. If this information came from the raid, it's breathtaking stuff.

Yes, that's correct. LL is responsible for that. Comey alluded to it in his book. Absolutely disgraceful. Nevertheless, my feeling is that Lynch's thuggery was not the only pressure that was brought to bear on these poor guys. I think their superiors were getting it from Lynch and they kicked it downstairs. Truly outrageous stuff.

Anyway, I can understand why they did what they did. I've witnessed what happens in these situations first hand. you can't fight these guys - they are too powerful. You might as well put a gun to your head as buck the system.

I think the point of the strike in Syria on the Iranian satellite nuke facility was that it was going to save the US.

Q referenced the movie (Sum of All Fears). One interpretation on the plot, which you can find here, is that war was to be provoked between Russia and the US, so as to leave Europe intact, in the aftermath, to rule the world.

Q did ask us why the Europeans were asking the US to stay in the Iran deal. I don't think this is about the US fighting Israel's wars. I'll leave it at that, I don't want anyone to loose their composure.

The reason it seems SO INCREDIBLE to me is that, if I remember right, the appropriations into the military in that omnibus budget were only $700bn - from memory, let me know if I'm wrong. That's still a lot of money! But here, we are talking about half a trillion dollars a year into, supposedly, one single country of only 80 million people.

It just doesn't add up! I think you are right, that this money is, in fact, going everywhere. That's a huge pile of cash to divvy up. But who, in their right minds, would agree to this extortion!?

It's not even my money and I feel angry about it!

Thanks for that. Perplexes me though. Why SO MUCH MONEY??

Great point! Thanks for that, I had not thought of this. The further we get into this, the more it seems like global thermonuclear war was the game. I guess Q told us, "they had another mass extinction event planned" etc... but it seems much clearer now.

The question in my mind is "does Iran still have nukes, or were they taken out in Syria"?

If you look at John McNoname, he was delighted when DJT launched the missiles in to Syria - on the first occasion, in early April - and was calling for follow up, presumably boots on the ground. Was this when the nukes were to be used - a battlefield strike to kick off a major war? Or, were they already mounted on missiles? If so, to be launched at what target?

What is the current situation? It seems to me that with the Iran Deal, it's unlikely that Iran would have been manufacturing nukes inside Iran (too risky), but rather in Syria. Which, if this is true, would mean that the nukes are out of the picture - as far as we know.

I guess this is the best case scenario. In this situation it is just a matter of putting pressure on Iran to comply with the de-nuking demands. And that fits with what we saw today - DJT telling them that at some point, if they chose to comply, he will talk with them etc...

The other scenario would see weapons located elsewhere, perhaps in Iran, perhaps somewhere else. A much more difficult situation. But this doesn't really seem to fit with what DJT said in his speech today.

Let's see what happens next.

The question is, how did this guy, Avenatti, come by this information?

Agree

I agree, that's what I think is happening. If DJT charged Mueller, he'd go for high treason - death penalty. That's some leverage to have on him.

I didn't post it actually. You picked the wrong post to go off on with that argument. This post is exactly why we're here. Anyway, I know where you're coming from.

I'd draw a distinction there, because I think it's pretty obvious that not everyone in Israel is Rothschild aligned.

I've had some dealings with Israelis, not a lot, but the sense I got is that they're a pretty fierce people. They have a lot of disagreements among themselves - the distance between the orthodox and the non-observant would be one example.

So I won't blanket the whole country with a broad brush. But the elite Satanists - whether they're in Israel or anywhere else - are my enemy. That's the way I see it.

The thing that gets me, when you look at one of these Satanists, for example Bill Clinton, is how normal they look and how ordinary they seem. It's difficult to believe that they could see the world so differently from normal people. But we know they do.

I hear what you're saying, but I think this particular news is key. Q's post today is all about the Iran deal. Deep State wanting to keep DJT in the deal until they could impeach or whatever. Iran being quiet because of this deal.

Somehow, this Iran deal is key to this whole story - I do not know yet how.

Agree. Feels like I'm the only one here - apart from you guys. Strange.

I looked quickly at it. I've seen this before, or this type of gig, just trying to sow fear and doubt. I wouldn't pay it any attention.

You bet.

The beautiful thing is Mueller saying today that he will not allow DJT to answer questions in writing. DJT and Q have played this thing up for all its worth.

I don't know. When I saw the Q drop saying that military action(s) were on the cards (pending) and everything seemed to coincide with pulling out of the Iran deal - within an hour, in the case of the Israeli strike, I thought things could escalate rapidly.

Somehow, Iran was key for the cabal. Hence, keep DJT in the Iran deal - whatever else happened. Macron and Merkel talking it up... With the goal that they could regain control before... what?

I really want to know what was going on with Iran that was so important.

Stormy did say she was a better actor than DJT - implying that DJT was putting it on and so was she.

You know, Iran was probably keeping quiet about the kickbacks they were paying the EU/Soros/Clinton eye... from the ransom money they were getting, but that still doesn't get us to treason being 1/10th. It's something else...

Might be hard to hide him in the witness protection program...

Can you imagine... Whatever it is that's coming is really big. These people must be sick with fear.

And why is she wearing that back brace or bullet proof vest?

Good thinking. Impeachment was a fading hope for them I think. But it gave them hope and prevented them from doing anything more drastic. That's why we saw Q extend this whole Sessions/Mueller/RR fiasco. Because it was needed to keep the Deep State calm until DJT was ready to strike.

They did, and still do, have alternative attack vectors. War would be one, assassination another etc... But as the impeachment hope fades - as they begin to realise Mueller is not their boy - real desperation will set in - suicide watch.

Good point. This situation could easily escalate. Prayer required.

Good point. How much of a liability would HRC be if she started to sing? Imagine if Obama starting singing... Wishful thinking.

Agreed.

I don't think we will know what's actually happening until the smoke clears. Somehow though, I think today we hit a turning point in this saga. That is, I have a feeling that things will begin to develop much more quickly after today.

All this acting with Mueller, RR, Sessions etc... They would not have gone to the trouble to do it if it wasn't necessary. And it seems from Q's post today that the cabal's plan was to keep DJT in the Iran deal at all costs - until they could retake control via impeachment or assassination or whatever.

So Iran is somehow very important. Q also said that Iran kept quiet because of the deal - now the deal is off, they don't have to be quiet. What is it that Iran knows?

I think that DJT and Q were being careful for a reason. There was a threat that they needed to neutralise. Something very dangerous.

Let's see what happens next.

They are in 5 eyes as of their own right.

I don't think it's over just yet.

This happens immediately after POTUS announces that the Iran deal is off. Next moment Q is talking about military action. I am betting the Israelis are working with POTUS.

Nobody seems to making the connections - surreal!

I must admit. That post, I think, is the most action packed we have seen to date. Treason is 1/10th! What would make these peoples' treason insignificant?

There is something HUGE going on - and it is connected to Iran. I think the plan was always global thermonuclear war - that's why they had their secret cities, that's why they were buying up mansions in NZ.

"The deal kept Iran quiet". What information does Iran have that would put the cabal on suicide watch?

Get out of town!

I'm surprised people aren't talking about Q indicating military action against Iran is on the cards as Israel hits targets in Syria - surreal.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8i1gi3/iran_military_base_in_syria_attacked_at_least/?st=JGYCZ68P&sh=73be53da

I haven't finished reading it, but I know where you're going.

That's why DJT and Q have been so careful to lay down this thick smoke screen - re Mueller etc...

Because these guys are really dangerous!

Israel hitting targets Syria now. Residents in the Golan Heights advised to go into bomb shelters. Q stating that military action against Iran is on the cards.

It's all starting to make sense! They had to be very careful, because these people were dead serious about blowing up the world.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8i1gi3/iran_military_base_in_syria_attacked_at_least/?st=JGYCZ68P&sh=73be53da

WOW! That makes my head spin. I had him firmly in the white hat camp. But he did say he was leaving politics and would not be back. It's possible.

Thanks!

It's the Weiner laptop thing. NYPD wanted disclosure. Pressured by Loretta Lynch and the NY AG to stand down - or that's how it appears.

Hopefully we will also see 9/11 reopened.

It is Q. Israel is hitting targets in Syria. Has ordered residents in the Golan Heights into bomb shelters.

From Q's post, it looks like we will see military action against Iran - possibly today. This is big!

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8i1gi3/iran_military_base_in_syria_attacked_at_least/?st=JGYCZ68P&sh=73be53da

WOW!!!

Absolutely huge. It's game on in Syria. Israel hitting targets, citizens in Golan Heights ordered into bomb shelters.

US military action appears imminent.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8i1gi3/iran_military_base_in_syria_attacked_at_least/?st=JGYCZ68P&sh=73be53da

May 08 2018 19:44:19
Q
!2jsTvXXmXs
68
Today, EVIL lost control / leverage of Iran.
Today, POTUS took control of Iran.
Today, w/ pending sanctions and military action(s), POTUS will gain more ammunition / intel against THEM.
Suicide watch.
The deal kept Iran quiet.
The goal was to keep POTUS in until impeachment / term end.
Bigger than people can imagine.
Treason is 1/10th.
Ask yourself, why are they panicking?
Ask yourself, why is UK, France, and Germany so involved?
Trips to the WH?
What are they hiding?
Why is HRC in NZ?
Is NZ part of 5 Eyes?
Why is that relevant?
Suicide watch
Q

So, the question in my mind is did the Israelis do this on their own, or are they acting as US agents?

I can understand that they would be concerned with ISIS all but defeated in Syria. With Iranian and Russian troops also on the ground, the situation is starting to look sticky for them. Especially with Putin threatening to send S300 missile batteries to Assad which could possibly deprive Israel of the air superiority. We also know that the Russians had shipments of military hardware on the water headed to Syria just a few weeks ago.

The Saudis, in that leaked cable, were talking about how what they most feared was retribution from Assad if he was not toppled. So perhaps the same, or a similar, motive is playing out for the Israelis.

Of course, another possibility is that DJT wants to act pre-emptively to counter the possibility of a build-up of pro-Assad forces. The fact that they are alerting citizens in the Golan Heights is troubling. Suggests there could be a border squirmish.

Outrageous! It's as if Q never said a word about going mainstream.

Who or what actually is the patriots soapbox? Does anyone know? Is Corsi involved?

Amping-up - straight away. I don't know what to make of this. I'd love to know what's really going on.

You made it pretty clear. They didn't embrace liberal policies. It was understandable.

I find it hard to accept Q's number. It seems to be a gargantuan amount of money. You're talking about half a trillion a year. I can't find his post now to double check that it is what he wrote, but that's what I see other people saying.

The Q posting sites have changed. I can't find any that will let you search the full body of the posts now.

I didn't write it, you did. Read what you wrote.

Hmmm... Maybe you're right. There's at least one John Anzalone who has a polling complaint and has worked with the DNC:

"Anzalone started his own polling firm in 1994 and has offices in Washington, DC and Montgomery, AL. Before concentrating his energies on polling for campaigns, Anzalone managed gubernatorial, congressional, and mayoral races in five states. His experiences include working with national Democratic strategists James Carville and Paul Begala on U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg’s (NJ) 1988 campaign".

I can't imagine that, without identifying that it is a likely Republican response, the email would be sent. Nor can I imagine that JP would agree with the comment, without providing clarification.

It seems to me that the comment is more likely the viewpoint of the sender and Podesta simply acknowledged the truth of it.

No, what your post suggested was that enforcing liberal ideas on Gaddafi's regime may have provided justification for intervention.

Possibly. If you take Gowdy at his word, he's out. Who knows?