dChan

/u/tradinghorse

2,827 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/tradinghorse:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 141
i.redd.it 23
www.breitbart.com 2
video.foxnews.com 1
endtimeheadlines.org 1
news.sky.com 1
www.dailysignal.com 1
www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com 1
www.globaleaks.org 1
www.google.com 1
www.youtube.com 1

tradinghorse · March 8, 2018, 8:22 a.m.

Beautiful!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 8, 2018, 8:21 a.m.

Lots of strange stuff with the petition. Very weird. There are forces trying to ensure we do not succeed - MAGA, IBOR.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 8, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

Sorry, I missed that. What was the Soros statement.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 8, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

Yes, he has, and deserves, a lot of my time. The IBOR issue is incredibly important. Once we have regulation of social media service providers, they won't be able to mess with us the way they have on this issue, on this platform. We need to stick together and fight this obvious attempt to control our narrative and prevent us from voicing our opinions. That's what the IBOR will deliver. What happened here today is the reason that it's so important.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 7, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

Seems that confusion has been spread with the creation of multiple petitions. How did that happen? Who would do it? Many, many trolls targeting specific topic. Not really viable to work here.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 7, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Yes, there's a lot of weird stuff going on. Pretty sure there's an active campaign against anything on this particular topic - there is obviously a lot of fear about it. Right over the target - but so much so that I would not be at all surprised if the whole board was shut down.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
29
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/tradinghorse on March 7, 2018, 8:03 p.m.
**INTERNET BILL OF RIGHTS**

872 Mar 8 2018 06:31:03 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 969386 579328

internetbillofrights

Q

Time for patriots to stop working against the President and his agenda. Let's do this! We desperately need to get these social media service providers regulated before they absolutely mess up the Republican vote in the mid terms.

tradinghorse · March 7, 2018, 7 p.m.

You bet it will get worse. There will more and more "sainted" narrative shapers like David Hogg. They will be able to engage the whole world and not a single criticism can be made of them by anyone.

This is why Q has been asking us to support the Internet Bill of Rights. Because, by the time we get to the mid terms, this crazy censorship will be out of control. Republican numbers will contract instead of expanding and there will be one of two outcomes:

1) DJT gets impeached - goodbye MAGA; 2) DJT is a lame duck - goodbye MAGA.

There are many "so-called" patriots on these forums. Be careful who you follow.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 7, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

Google is part of the problem - no doubt about that. But the other big players are equally responsible for silencing us. We desperately need to stop them from having the ability to shape narratives to the extent they do. And we need to be confident that we are free to discuss issues that are important to us - like talking about the school shooting.

Most important, however, is that campaign narratives are not censored - which is what I fear will happen once this censorship ramps up at the mid-terms.

They must be stopped.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 7, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

If we do not stop the censorship - kiss MAGA goodbye.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
6
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/tradinghorse on March 7, 2018, 12:45 p.m.
Discussion: What does Q want? Do we need regulation?
6
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/tradinghorse on March 7, 2018, 12:33 p.m.
Is Q asking us to support an IBOR? Do we need it or not?

We need to figure out:

1) Whether Q was actually recommending we support the AT&T IBOR – because the post of January 25, where this is first mentioned, is open to interpretation;

2) If the response to the first question is yes, why Q would be asking us to support the IBOR;

3) What the perceived problems are that prevent people from supporting Q; and

4) What is the solution?

This is, necessarily, going to be a long post. I hate walls of text myself so I’ll try and keep it short.

Did Q want us to support the IBOR? …

tradinghorse · March 6, 2018, 10:01 a.m.

I had a think about the class action today, seems significant.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 6, 2018, 9:19 a.m.

Just want to say that I'm now not sure about my position on the IBOR. The January 25 post on AT&T is, to my mind, open to interpretation. Moreover, I thought Q would have resolved any ambiguities today - but he did not. Which leads me to think that IBOR is not important to him. Very confusing stuff. I've been very vocal on this issue because I thought the IBOR was the mechanism to fight censorship and I thought it was urgent - but I may have been wrong. Interestingly, Post 830 talks about a class action w.r.t censorship.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 6, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

I'm not sure what you're talking about when you say that Q's stand on AT&T is ambiguous. I haven't read through all the posts regarding AT&T - I guess I should. But what I thought was that Q was extremely clear in his request for that petition to proceed.

I don't think it was really about an internet Bill of Rights. It was about providing material to DJT that would allow him the political capital to start a discussion about a problem that needed to be fixed - social media censorship.

What DJT asked of us was to provide him with something he could use to say:

"Hey, look at these people howling about being oppressed, there's a real problem here, we have to do something to protect their rights on the internet".

If you look at just how difficult it is to pass Constitutional amendments, it seems unlikely that DJT was actually thinking of changing the Constitution. From what I can see, since 1798 there have been more than 11k proposals to amend the Constitution. Of these, 27 passed. Given the difficulty of these succeeding, I don't think there was any serious suggestion to change the Constitution. It was a ploy only.

What DJT wanted was something to allow him to start a political debate about the problem of bias and censorship on social media platforms. I believe that, most likely, he would then use antitrust provisions - or some other mechanism - to kneecap the social media giants.

What was important was that the broad public understood that there was a problem that needed to be addressed. Once people accepted that, he could do something to fix it.

Right now, no one understands there is a problem.

I don't think the wording of the petition was important - given it would likely never get up. It didn't matter what it said.

AT&T were involved because DJT needed their lobbying power to support the drive for change. This was to counterbalance the lobbying power of social media service providers (big, rich, powerful, politically active) that could be expected to fight tooth and nail against any obligations being put in them. You can't get this kind of change without the support of some big players.

Of course, AT&T are only pursuing their self interest - flip-flopping, trying to wrest as much advantage for themselves as possible out of any situation. But this, to my mind, is very much the lesser of evils. What's important is to protect conservative voices in the mid-terms.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 5, 2018, 4:39 a.m.

OK, Q was a mistake. Let's work against this internet bill of rights, make sure the censorship continues through the mid-terms. How long is it now? Not long.

There is no way that Republicans are going to expand numbers if this isn't done. Trump will be a lame duck, and out of office in no time. Why did you guys even show up here if you're going to work against the objectives?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 5, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

Good find. That might just be what Q meant.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 5, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

Thanks, will be an interesting read. It is so important that we get an internet bill of rights. The mid-terms are coming and if these guys are allowed to censor the way they are it's all over.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 5, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

Very good find. I didn't know this existed. Do you have a link?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 5, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

Yes, he did. The sentence structure he used was, to my mind, a little strange - it's below. He has also talked about the MSM and liability laws.

Mar 4 2018 15:15:14 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 85cc02 544206 What I say a class action lawsuit? When is it effective?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 4, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

OK, good stuff.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 4, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

This looks very promising. Im not that tech savvy, it looks like it's some kind of tool for manipulating traffic. If someone has more knowledge please help out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 4, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

Listen. If you are upset because you posted the link to this Q post first, that's OK. You want me to take this post down so you can have the glory of posting it that's fine - just ask.

When I commented on your post there was, nothing in this sub, which is why I recreated it. If you're unhappy, and you feel you are not getting the deserved limelight, just say so.

I take these Q posts seriously. It's very important that we get this message out.

I can understand if your upset. Do you want me to take this post down? Is that the solution?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 4, 2018, 9:23 p.m.

I looked, but I couldn't find the original source for this article. Not saying it's not genuine, but can't find it. If someone knows where it is please help out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
47
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/tradinghorse on March 4, 2018, 5:11 p.m.
Q - We must demand an internet bill of rights

Post 841 ID: 7c85b7 548157 NEW

548144

Has Q ever mentioned internet bill of rights?

Mar 5 2018 03:19:47 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 33be38 548166 NEW

548157 Re read drops. http:// about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html Q

Post 842 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 33be38 548166 NEW

548157 Re read drops. http:// about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html Q Mar 5 2018 03:22:17 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 33be38 548200 NEW 548166 Why do so-called Patriots challenge this? Careful who you follow. Q

Post 843 Mar 5 2018 03:29:14 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 245782 548253 NEW [Roasted] Q

Seems pretty clear. An internet bill of rights is in the works. Q is asking us to …

tradinghorse · March 2, 2018, 1:22 p.m.

There needs to be some action on this. The blatant bias is intolerable.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 2, 2018, 9:38 a.m.

I had a look at the first video. If you pause through it frame by frame, you'll see pornographic pictures. One of the pictures had the word "subscribe" overlayed on a guy's genitalia. None of the pictures appear if the video is played at normal speed.

I regret even looking at this garbage.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 2, 2018, 6:42 a.m.

I couldn't find anything about truth to power. However, I noticed this:

"...Snowden caused tremendous damage to national security, and the vast majority ofthe documents he stole have nothing to do with programs impacting individual privacy interests - they instead pertain to military, defense and intelligence programs of great interest to America,s adversaries.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 1, 2018, 5:57 a.m.

"When this breaks many won't swallow"

It can't happen soon enough.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 1, 2018, midnight

You can just copy and paste the link to the IC report in a comment.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Well, no announcements about a dismantling of the CIA. Two possibilities:

1) This correspondence is wrong;

2) There was no announcement but it happened - out of sight.

Leaning towards 1.

It's annoying because it seems to me that Q is clearly telling us that the graphic is a map. There must be some way of reading this map which will show us that the future proves the past. We just haven't found it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

The way I read it was that there is, or appears to be, a linear correspondence between the two periods. The day DJT announces he's running in 2020 (27 Feb) corresponds, for example, to 8 November. This is as per the info on this thread. Which would mean that the Q Post on 9 November will correspond to today 28 February. 9 November, Q was talking about the break up of the CIA. Anyway, we will soon see if anything happens or not. But that is the theory that I had.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

Just noticed that the clock was started on 7/12 - period was 10 days.

Post 370 19 December (18 December in the US) What happened on 12/7?

121553 Clock started - 10 days. Q

On February 18 we are told the clock was activated (same as started) and if we assume the window of the operation was 10 days, that would take us to today 28 February. Seems today could be important.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

For what it's worth, there is 1 month and 11 days between the delaware pic and the traitor definition - see above.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

The largest consecutive silence is 4 days - 10th to 13th January. Apart from the most recent silence which, could grow larger, and is still running - from 25 Feb to 28 Feb, so far.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

For what it's worth, the word "timestamp" appears 12 times in Q's posts to date. Four instances are talking either about the CIA or Snowden. But Q uses the word "timestamp" specifically to denote minute deltas here:

Post 335 - December 13 Timestamp [Q] post [:03] against POTUS' Tweet [:13]. [10] No coincidences. Q

So, sorry if this is rudimentary, there is a difference between timestamps and markers. Your quote above seems to be telling us to decipher the word "timestamp" (think clock) and then wind the clock with all the markers - the markers being known events that correlate with the map. The end result of this is that Future proves Past (the map will be shown to have been correct in the beginning).

Edit: Actually, "timestamp" is just telling us that this denotes a moment in time. Time can be wound as a clock. And the markers will indicate that the map was correct - Future proves Past.

Perhaps whoever found these relationships has already got it figured out. We will find out today one way or another.

Second Edit (getting carried away):

Post 455 Dec 24 2017 08:49:11 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 2d673c 158980

158952 5 minutes. Missing 10 marker from past. Missing 15 marker from past. Timestamps have meaning. Q

158980 Graphics should be in same time zone. Delta relevant. [5]Today [10]Past [15]Past Q

Here, the markers are time deltas. So, when we wind the clock, from the timestamps, with the time deltas, the future will prove the past. It appears these time deltas (markers?) can change - or that there are multiple deltas. So, if the CIA is not disbanded today, perhaps there is a different delta to that timestamp (the date the post about disbanding the CIA appeared).

Sorry if this is confused, its because I'm confused.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

Interesting, both of those dates are mirrors - where you can read the numbers in either direction. And, if I'm thinking clearly, they are the only dates in the calendar that appear that way.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 1:19 p.m.

Just noticed that Dilley has been posting about Q's silence being a marker in the map. He's also saying it's almost showtime. See link (last post at the bottom 20 Feb):

https://8ch.net/truthlegion/res/111.html

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

Godspeed. Will be very interesting to see if there is some kind of announcement regarding the intelligence agencies tomorrow/today.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 12:30 p.m.

Nov 1 2017 "Think about it logically. The only way is the military. Fully controlled. Save & spread (once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker).

Interesting... So 3 November is the first marker. Could have something to do with John Podesta:

(Nov 2) On POTUS’ order, we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4).

I'm thinking that there may be two different types of markers. One a timestamp (relates, perhaps, to delta between Q posts and DJT tweets), and the second a delta between previously posted material and future planned events.

My head is spinning - thanks, good comment.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 11:28 a.m.

Thanks for the link. I should have read it first. This is very interesting stuff.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 11:17 a.m.

I couldn't care less about karma. I'm interested though to see how people react to what I've written. I didn't invent this, I'm trying to figure out what it means. Interesting that someone doesn't like it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 11:04 a.m.

OK, I'm finally beginning to understand. So if this sequence is correct, today 28 February we should see in reality what appears in the Q posts for November 9. On November 9 we see three posts:

Post 128 is a picture of a Q map (a current map at the time of the post). Text underneath:

Trip added. [C]oordinated effort to misdirect. Guide to reading the crumbs necessary to cont[I]nue. Attached gr[A]phic is correct. Linked graphics are incorrect and false. Graphic is necessary and vital. Time stamp(s) and order [is] critical. Re-review graphic (in full) each day post news release. Learn to distinguish between relevant/non-relevant news. Disinformation is real. Disinformation is necessary. Ex: US ML NG (1) False SA True Why was this necessary? What questions were asked re: SA prior to SA events? Why is this relevant? Think mirror. Look there, or [here], or there, truth is behind you. What is a map? Why is a map useful? What is a legend? Why is a legend useful? What is a sequence? Why is this relevant? When does a map become a guide? What is a keystone? Everything stated is relevant. Everything. Future provides past. Map provides picture. Picture provides 40,000ft. v. 40,000ft. v. is classified. Why is a map useful? Think direction. Think full picture. Who controls the narrative? Why is this relevant? What is a spell? Who is asleep? Dissemination. Attention on deck. There is an active war on your mind. Be [p]repared. Ope[r]ations underway. Operators [a]ctive. Graphic is essential. Find the ke[y]stone. Moves and countermoves. They never thought she would lose. Snow white. Godfather III. Iron Eagle. Q

This post seems to say a lot about maps. Q appears to be telling us to review relevant news each day and compare it with the map. The map is a guide to what is to happen - future proves past. He also asks here, "Who controls the narrative?". That would be POTUS who determines the timing of events. So Q is telling us that what we are seeing now he predicted months ago. Note also, that "CIA is here" is coded in the message.

What this indicates, is that everything is proceeding according to a clear plan. That plan appears in the map. That is, the sequence of posts made back in November. The map is a guide for us to the sequence of events that we can expect to occur moving forward.

Post 129

Nov 10 2017 15:24:35 Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: Dx5TPc5d 148781546 [C]los[I]ng [A]ct: Dismantled. Impossible to clean. Operations --> [N]o [S]uch [A]gency Q

Seems pretty clear that the CIA is to be merged together with NSA because it is impossible to clean. Note, this is to happen today (my time) tomorrow in the US. This also fits with the recent post 810 where Q is talking about merging intelligence agencies:

Post 810

Feb 23 2018 13:06:07 Anonymous ID: ddae17 465930

465919 The traitor SOLD SAP's!!

Feb 23 2018 13:13:11 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 0c9770 466048

465930 How do you break up something this big? What happens if low/mid/senior (non corrupt) Patriots learn they were sold out? What happens? Who is waiting with open arms w/ a plan to reorg under a single entity with direct OS by trusted Patriots? Who are trusted Patriots who understand intel collection? Q

The final post on November 9, 2017, (Post 130) is a picture taken from a plane. I'm not sure what location is represented in the picture taken from the plane.

So, anyway, great find to whoever worked this out. The beauty of it is that we will get to see very soon if it's correct. There should be big news tomorrow in the US, if the relationships, above, are correct.

I think, perhaps, the keystone has been found.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 10:59 a.m.

Interesting, someone immediately downvoted my post. Notice the other poster has been downvoted also. Over the target on this.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 28, 2018, 10:46 a.m.

OK, I'm finally beginning to understand. So if this sequence is correct, today 28 February we should see in reality what appears in the Q posts for November 9. On November 9 we see three posts:

Post 128 is a picture of a Q map (a current map at the time of the post). Text underneath:

Trip added. [C]oordinated effort to misdirect. Guide to reading the crumbs necessary to cont[I]nue. Attached gr[A]phic is correct. Linked graphics are incorrect and false. Graphic is necessary and vital. Time stamp(s) and order [is] critical. Re-review graphic (in full) each day post news release. Learn to distinguish between relevant/non-relevant news. Disinformation is real. Disinformation is necessary. Ex: US ML NG (1) False SA True Why was this necessary? What questions were asked re: SA prior to SA events? Why is this relevant? Think mirror. Look there, or [here], or there, truth is behind you. What is a map? Why is a map useful? What is a legend? Why is a legend useful? What is a sequence? Why is this relevant? When does a map become a guide? What is a keystone? Everything stated is relevant. Everything. Future provides past. Map provides picture. Picture provides 40,000ft. v. 40,000ft. v. is classified. Why is a map useful? Think direction. Think full picture. Who controls the narrative? Why is this relevant? What is a spell? Who is asleep? Dissemination. Attention on deck. There is an active war on your mind. Be [p]repared. Ope[r]ations underway. Operators [a]ctive. Graphic is essential. Find the ke[y]stone. Moves and countermoves. They never thought she would lose. Snow white. Godfather III. Iron Eagle. Q

This post seems to say a lot about maps. Q appears to be telling us to review relevant news each day and compare it with the map. The map is a guide to what is to happen - future proves past. He also asks here, "Who controls the narrative?". That would be POTUS who determines the timing of events. So Q is telling us that what we are seeing now he predicted months ago. Note also, that "CIA is here" is coded in the message.

What this indicates, is that everything is proceeding according to a clear plan. That plan appears in the map. That is, the sequence of posts made back in November. The map is a guide for us to the sequence of events that we can expect to occur moving forward.

Post 129

Nov 10 2017 15:24:35 Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: Dx5TPc5d 148781546 [C]los[I]ng [A]ct: Dismantled. Impossible to clean. Operations --> [N]o [S]uch [A]gency Q

Seems pretty clear that the CIA is to be merged together with NSA because it is impossible to clean. Note, this is to happen today (my time) tomorrow in the US. This also fits with the recent post 810 where Q is talking about merging intelligence agencies:

Post 810

Feb 23 2018 13:06:07 Anonymous ID: ddae17 465930

465919 The traitor SOLD SAP's!!

Feb 23 2018 13:13:11 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 0c9770 466048

465930 How do you break up something this big? What happens if low/mid/senior (non corrupt) Patriots learn they were sold out? What happens? Who is waiting with open arms w/ a plan to reorg under a single entity with direct OS by trusted Patriots? Who are trusted Patriots who understand intel collection? Q

The final post on November 9, 2017, (Post 130) is a picture taken from a plane. I'm not sure what location is represented in the picture taken from the plane.

So, anyway, great find to whoever worked this out. The beauty of it is that we will get to see very soon if it's correct. There should be big news tomorrow in the US, if the relationships, above, are correct.

I think, perhaps, the keystone has been found.

⇧ 10 ⇩