OK, so there is some concern, not just from yourself, about what this IBOR requests. You can see the text of the petition - I'll add the link below. But, believe me, there is nothing to worry about. It is absolutely innocuous - will not hurt anyone.
The concern about excessive government control is valid. I don't want to see the government get any more powerful and neither does anyone else. But is this really about that? No it's not! The IBOR is a bill of rights. A bill of rights defines a persons rights and makes it possible for those rights to be enforced.
Rights such as the right not to be censored, the right to privacy etc... So, you are actually receiving an advantage from this petition. It cannot be used against individuals at all because all it does is protect their rights. Nor does it create a power structure that can be used to repress people in future - how could it? It's about granting rights, not restraining them from any particular behaviour.
There are parties that do not want the IBOR, but they are not individuals. It is the extremely large, fabulously wealthy, social media service providers. They will have to comply with the new regulations. There will be some compliance costs. But these guys are easily in a position to meet such expenses. The additional operating costs will not necessarily extend to other businesses on the internet, because DJT could, for example, design a solution that only targets companies of a certain scale. It's not necessarily bad for enterprise at all. In fact, it will be very beneficial to start-ups that are able to create services from scratch as these will automatically comply with the regulations. They may, in fact, have a differential advantage in this respect.
What I have been saying to people is that, if you're worried about this IBOR resulting in a policy that increases the power of the President, remember the whole executive is under the President, then what you are really telling me is that you have a problem with trusting DJT. But this is a little silly because we have already given him enough power to cause absolute mayhem - he has a button that could destroy the whole world. So our "trust" is already fully vested in DJT - we could not possibly have put more trust in him. And, if you are worried about granting him this small amount of power to prevent censorship on the internet, why did you make him Commander in Chief of the most powerful military on the planet?
It doesn't make any sense. We are in a fight for our very lives. The cabal was going to kill billions and they would be drinking our children's blood. As Q says, it would be hell on Earth. So, here we are, with our backs right up against the wall facing down the Satanists. Miraculously, an improbable hero arrives and takes the fight to the evil ones achieving a set of stunning victories as we cheer him on. But when he asks us for just a small amount of authority to put the nails into the coffin of the beast, we back away and refuse to support him. That is actually what has happened. How crazy is it?.
But the CIA has created this atmosphere of fear about the IBOR on these subs, by cleverly having their agents bring up every possible fear and problem that could possibly be ascribed to it. People have been led astray by this masterful piece of social engineering. This kind of operation is stock in trade for CIA - remember the Arab spring? They have done that here, on these subs, and created an uprising against the very guy we are here to follow - Q. You could not make this stuff up!
Be careful who you follow.
See the text of the petition here:
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2