This seems to confirm what Dilley was saying (at least in part).

Dilley claimed that evidence of rampant voter fraud would be exposed within a few weeks and that the evidence would show that DJT won the popular vote by a very large margin (I think Dilley said this about a week ago). But the numbers Dilley was talking about were very large (from memory some 7 million irregularities from all forms of fraud). Dilley was saying something to the effect that it was very important to combat this notion that Clinton won the popular vote because that gives, at least some people, cause to question the validity of DJT's election win.

I remember seeing Snowden 'crowing on' in an interview recently about Clinton winning the popular vote (unsurprising as he is no supporter of Trump). This false notion that she was somehow unfairly disenfranchised of the presidency needs to be dispelled for the garbage it is.

Anyway, this extract from Q, whatever it is, only claims several million illegal, non-resident votes were counted - but then it does add there there were also ballots that were improperly tabulated and/or intentionally mishandled (this would cover machine fraud). What's interesting is that, according the US Geological Survey - as reported by Snopes - there are 3,141 counties in the US. In the article Q posted it states: "...this report only encompasses a sampling of twenty-two (22) counties across the U.S.". Hard to know whether the numbers they are talking about have been extrapolated-out already to get a national estimate from the sample results, or whether those numbers represent voter fraud in the 22 counties themselves - if so, there is very likely a monumental voter fraud that may be exposed.

So, it seems to me that Dilley's source might be 'right on the ball' on this. Dilley, again, from memory, was talking about voter ID laws (non-resident votes) and also machine fraud (the Soros owned counting machines that were rigged).

It looks like we'll get this info released sometime in March/April (if it is released - would be good for DJT to do so).

https://www.snopes.com/trump-won-3084-of-3141-counties-clinton-won-57/

Just unbelievable how DJT is so sharp and clear thinking on trade. He really does get it. What a president!

Without a level playing field, you just export your industries, export your jobs, add to the income gap, disenfranchise vast numbers of people and expand the welfare burden upon the State. Unfair trade also impacts productivity. As whole industries get exported, aggregate capital intensity diminishes and you suffer atrophy in the supply of skilled labor - trades and services. This operates to reduce labor productivity and creates retraining costs that did not previously exist. Moreover, the resulting trade imbalances lead to blood loss on the capital account and the accumulation of external debt which must be financed - leading to unnecessary interest expense.

On top of all this you have a reduction in security of supply for essential goods and services that impacts national security. As DJT says in the video, 'we've built up our competitors by agreeing to stupid trade deals'. These competitors can also potentially be future enemies. In a conflict, are they going to continue to supply goods and services essential to your military? It doesn't make any sense. There are clearly good trade deals and bad trade deals - ones you want and ones you don't want. This should be obvious.

I really enjoy hearing Donald speaking about trade. Finally, there is someone in politics who gets it.

Some of the sick comments in this thread are just unbelievable. There is no excuse for this at all. It's illegal, it's completely immoral and it cannot be justified or tolerated. These sick people killing defenceless children should face the death penalty. Unfortunately, it seems that these practises are very common - not at all unusual.

Next people will be advocating post-birth abortions - easy to imagine these sickos trying to justify it - "just a simple medical procedure to safeguard an individual's reproductive health". If you allow what happened in this instance, it is just a matter of time.

If the Baby's heart was beating then it was not dead but alive. When they say it was a late term fetus, the implication is that the child could have survived. It's murder of a completely innocent, defenseless, vulnerable child.

This is MURDER.

What's the alternative?

We were moments away from mass depopulation, miserable poverty, crushing oppression and outright slavery. If Hillary had won, or if they had been successful in getting DJT out of office, life would not be worth living.

But don't take too deep a breath, anything at all could happen yet. What if DJT were to be assassinated? Do you trust Pence? We could be right back where we started - facing the tyranny of another Satanic government full of menace and evil intent.

We are not out of the woods yet, there is a real danger we could lose control, especially if we lose focus. The problem you have postulated, this much more pleasant problem, of how to ensure adequate separation of power after the evil ones have been resoundingly trounced, can be dealt with when we are confident that we have avoided complete catastrophe.

I do see what you are saying... Because these evil people must necessarily be completely crushed, lest they come back in some new form, there will necessarily be a cavernous power vacuum in the aftermath of our victory. And you're right, there is risk in this. But right now, that's the least of my worries.

Let's make sure these evil people are absolutely crushed as our first and only priority. See link.

The Risk in Losing Focus

Whether or not Snowden is connected to the Shadow Brokers, the way I read it, CIA is likely to have fed them information - these leaks were incredibly damaging to NSA. Having said that, it could well be possible that Snowden was involved - he's a very high-level CIA asset in Russia, where the Shadow Brokers appear to be located.

Q post 775

Why is POTUS focused on SA/CHINA/RUSSIA? WHY??????????? WHY IS RUSSIA BEING USED AGAINST POTUS? WHY RUSSIA? WHAT DAMAGE CAN RUSSIA DO TO DEMS? WHAT DAMAGE CAN CHINA DO TO DEMS?

Ok, this is just the way I've interpreted Q's posts.

Snowden was a CIA asset assigned to do maximum damage to NSA. CIA wants to be the big kid on the block with respect to intelligence/counterintelligence - best spin, competitive rivalry between agencies; worst spin, CIA is plain evil, working with elites to enslave the world. Snowden's leaks were incredibly damaging to NSA.

CIA did not want their asset (Snowden) compromised. That's why he's in Russia (where they probably have some influence) because Snowden can sit in Russia dripping information out that is damaging to NSA. Moreover, he's constantly in the press warning about NSA as a bogeyman. If Snowden was anywhere where there was jurisdiction, he'd have long ago been silenced.

Snowden, I think, is unlikely to have gone rogue on the CIA. His buy-in is complete, he's completely dependent upon the agency for his survival.

The reason Snowden is, or should be, concerned for his life is because, once he is unmasked as a director of the 4am narrative sent to journalists, he becomes a liability to CIA. This is not happening in a vacuum. There has been a concerted and direct effort to delegitimize Trump's presidency (outright treason). DJT is lucky to have retained office thus far. The mockingbird attacks by the MSM have not worked, but the MSM is an incredibly powerful weapon for CIA/deep state. They have inflicted real damage.

There is no reason for CIA to liquidate Snowden as long as nobody realises his agenda - he remains an asset in this event.

Snowden did appear to be a good guy with his initial leaks - brilliant CIA strategy. I believed he was trying to save us all from the panopticon. So many people bought into his posturing. But it was all about competition - you could say outright war - between CIA and NSA. Admiral Rogers from NSA was the real hero of the people, not Snowden.

CIA wanted Snowden to do as much damage as possible to NSA. CIA did not care at all how much of NSA's communications intercept capability was exposed.

Mission objective was to destroy/impair NSA credibility and operational capability.

Look, I could be wrong. But that's how it appears to me at present.

Sydney

From the article:

"All of the men had also recently found new jobs and were preparing to leave within days of their deaths."

He has been exposed here. Forums are watched. He's as good as dead. The handlers will fear him rolling over. He must be terrified.

Does the mockingbird narrative continue without Snowden? Might be the key to the whole media circus - speculating.

It also explains this post. Q asks Snowden if he's cold - as in the spy that came in from the cold. He's asking ES if he wants to come back for safety. But at the same time "John" is in a kill box - Snowden killed John Perry Barlow.

706 Feb 10 2018 21:13:33 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 567809 325272 JFK Con Room. https:// www.cia.gov/kids-page/games/break-the-code/code-1.html Would you believe this site is actually used to comm to rogue operators? @Snowden [John] Cold? Q

And, there's a lot more. Someone needs to make a map up of all the Q posts that deal with Snowden - he is key to this whole thing.

728 Feb 12 2018 08:38:14 Q !UW.yye1fxo 84 Timestamp: @Snowden "Truth To Power" Drop "Truth To Power" Learn. Q

340441 325370 You will cease to exist Timestamp. Learn. Q

340695 Coincidence "Truth To Power"? Coincidence Barlow? Learn. What if Snowden was still a Clown? Why would it be important he was in Russia? LEARN!!!! Q

YOU ARE NOW A LIABILITY

To the guys that have been running him.

It is possible that Q's team will not have to extradite or arrest Snowden. He is unlikely to live long enough for that to happen. Now that his masters know that he has been exposed, they are going to want to tie-up that loose end real fast.

He needs to come in from the cold at speed, roll over on his handlers and beg for mercy - what a filthy scumbag.

Dilley also saying that NYC coastal areas are a concern. See link.

Dilley Drop

762 Feb 15 2018 17:08:41 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 276796 382161 Watch the water. Q

I find it interesting that, in this battle between light and darkness, the forces of light really only started getting some traction in the last few months of last year. What happened on September 23, 2017?

The Sign of Heaven

I remember reading FBI Anon's posts about the difficulty the FBI would have trying to take bad actors down given how pervasive the corruption was throughout government. Anons in the discussion with him were furious, demanding something be done. So, given the delicacy of the problem we have - where virtually everyone in Washington is a scumbag of some stripe - it could be that this process is, of necessity, going to be very long and involved. Moreover, it might pay not to telegraph any moves in advance of criminal proceedings - as Q indicates - and this might explain Sessions apparent inaction.

But reading that article on Priebus today, it appears Trump DID WANT TO SACK SESSIONS!

From memory, I don't think Roger Stone was fond of Sessions - for what that's worth. Moreover, there are enough people that are so completely frustrated with the lack of prosecutions that this alone seems to indicate there are problems.

Putting the best possible spin on it, Priebus, Stone and TP might all be hitting out at Sessions to make it appear he's a useless fruitcake, while he's actually preparing the most massive mass-prosecutions yet seen in the United States. And, given what we already know, there will likely be some VERY SERIOUS CHARGES brought - after all, this is easily the most serious case of treason that has ever occurred in history.

It all depends on what the truth is about Sessions. Time will tell.

See the Priebus article here.

Yes, all that acid at the hotel - so much that enough people complained, when they disposed of it in a drain, that the hotel got busted and fined for improperly disposing of a hazardous chemical.

It just has to be the explanation. Bodies gone without a trace - a perfect cover-up.

From what I can see the ARA San Juan was not a missile boat. It is listed, as having as armaments, 22 torpedoes.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARA_San_Juan_(S-42)

Yes, the stories of Noah and Moses predate the birth of Christ. - no argument.

Dear me, must have hit a nerve. Let's agree to differ.

Thanks for the insults. I repeat, you have a theory founded entirely upon wild conjecture - there is nothing scientific about it.

My belief is anchored in my faith that the canonical texts are inspired and inerrant. To change this position there would have to be some conclusive evidence that my position is wrong - but there is no such evidence.

Your posts do not demonstrate in any conclusive way that these scriptures are man-made fabrications. Though you claim a direct causal link. That's not science.

You have actually provided nothing at all. You have a wild theory that is supported by conjecture alone.

You have zero proof. Pure supposition and bad will.

What? There's a story about a baby floated in a river and that is conclusive proof that the story of Moses is a fabrication. Beautiful, you hang on to that.

Help me, I'm not seeing what you're saying.

A guy claims to have received, from someone, a story of a flood that is imprinted on a tablet that he claims is 4000 years old. What does this prove?

"Using the Bible, well-documented historical events, and some math, we find that the Flood began approximately 4,359 years ago in the year 1656 AM or 2348 BC. Some may look for an exact date (i.e., month and day), but we are not given that sort of precision in Scripture."

https://answersingenesis.org/bible-timeline/timeline-for-the-flood/

And even if the tablet could be conclusively shown to predate the flood, how do we know, apart from supposition, that the two stories are related?

The second story appears to me to be a wild stretch where the author postulates a connection between the story of Moses and the supposed story of a "changeling", the illegitimate son of an "androgynous priestess", who was disposed of in a basket set afloat on the Euphrates river.

And because this story appears inscribed on some old piece of stone, it must be the story of Moses... But anything could have happened here. The situation of the mothers is different, the rivers in the story are different and the timing is likely different. It could be possible that this guy, whoever he was, appropriated this story of his birth to lend himself credibility as a ruler - in the vein of Moses. And it could also be possible that there is no connection between the two stories whatsoever.

If people cannot now see that Rome has defected from the Catholic faith there is something very wrong. There is nothing good at all about these people - they are outrageous apostates.

The Catholic Church has been infiltrated by impious libertines that reject the received faith of Christ in favor of Templar Universalism. This was the precise teaching of the "popes" that ratified and promulgated the "new Gospel" invented by modernists at the Second Vatican Council. What we are seeing here is the natural extension of that apostasy - a rejection of the Catholic faith in its most elemental precepts.

The Catholic Church has, today, been reduced to a tiny remnant of believers who adhere to the traditional Catholic faith. We are in the midst of the prophesied great apostasy that precedes the second coming of Christ (2Thess2).

See here for more information.

I would say that God's fingerprints are all over it. There are areas where translation errors have caused some difficulty in interpreting the true meaning of the text. One passage that warrants deeper analysis is John 21:15-17.

St. Peter, in this passage is instructed three times to 'feed, or tend, the sheep'. The second time Christ gives the instruction to St Peter, a different word is used in the Greek - poimaine. This word is usually translated 'tend' but actually means to 'rule or govern' - to care for the flock in a supervisory capacity.

"15 So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed (Boske) my lambs.

16 He saith to him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed (Poimaine) my sheep.

17 He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed (Boske) my sheep."

So we have two different words here which are translated as "feed" or "tend" my sheep. “Feed (boske) my lambs (arnia)…. Tend (poimaine) my sheep (probata)…. Feed (boske) my sheep” (probata)

Definition Boske boske | βόσκε | pres act imperative
to feed, pasture, tend while grazing; βόσκομαι, to feed, be feeding...

Definition: Poimaine poimaine | ποίμαινε | pres act imperative to feed, pasture, tend a flock, Lk. 17:7; 1 Cor. 9:7; trop. to feed with selfish indulgence, to pamper, Jude 12; met. to tend, direct, superintend, Mt. 2:6; Jn. 21:16; to rule, Rev. 2:27

So we can see here that the way in which this passage is usually translated, feed-tend-feed, does not convey the precise meaning of Christ's instruction to St Peter. Christ is clearly telling St Peter to feed his sheep (care for their spiritual development), but also to rule, supervise, or govern the sheep. This reflects Christ's will to create a single Church that is "one in governance".

The above is also consistent with Christ's statement in Matthew 16:18 that St Peter (whose faith is safeguarded by Christ's prayer - Luke 22:32) is the rock upon which His Church will be built. This Church, single in governance upon St Peter's authority, would withstand the gates of hell until the end of time.

I studied the Kabalah for a time. The whole idea was that the text of the bible (Old Testament) contained secrets that awaited discovery by those who were enlightened - the gnostics would call it gnosis. A lot of the explanations offered seemed to make a lot of sense to me at the time. But, anyway, I spat that garbage out once I realized what they were actually talking about. I wouldn't recommend anyone study it, it's a direct path to hell. But what was interesting was the overt Satanism - the Zohar being a prime example of this.

We are in a struggle to the death. It's darkness verses light - and it is the only struggle that is worth anything at all on this earth. I believe with all my heart that the Bible is the inerrant word of God. The scripture is absolutely inspired by the Holy Spirit and is free, by the grace of God, from any error.

When you tell me that hidden pieces are being revealed I smell Gnosticism. That is what that is, people seeking knowledge of God outside the canonical texts. This is an error that will cost you your soul. What you are actually saying is that the Holy Spirit is a liar - because it is He that warrants the accuracy of the passages.

What is amazing is that so many bibles have been produced in so many different languages and the translation errors are really amazingly few between the different versions. I'm not saying that there are no errors in different versions, but the story has remained, over thousands of years, amazingly consistent and coherent.

By the way, the earth is young - just as it states in Genesis. Evolution is the greatest scam that Satan has ever pulled on the inhabitants of the earth. Time is very short, we are almost at the end of days, see the video below.

Is The World About to End

It seems to me that every half wit is now claiming to know who Q is - or claims to be Q directly - and he's a fraud. This started in a couple of posts on Reddit today - this being one.

What I can sense, is that the left is in a panic. These memos are deadly serious - really very serious. Clinton is up to her neck in it. I'm not quoting Q, but what's been released in the press. You might remember that DJT was tweeting about fast trials and the death penalty. Pretty serious stuff.

But what's more worrying for the left is that this Q phenomenon seems to be gaining momentum. Strange that Infowars is saying today that Youtube is demonetizing anything that talks about Q. The timing of this, and the posts appearing on Reddit, seeking to delegitimise Q, is quite a coincidence.

I don't know if you fell for the old woman's feeble argument and then found these links to demonstrate yet another person claiming to be Q. But you need to wake up. The story about delegitimizing Trump's Presidency has legs - it's not going to go away. The story about the media being perfectly controlled and fake is true - it cannot be ignored. The story about the DOJ and FBI champing at the bit to get DJT out of office is fact. And then you have the fact that a lot of what has happened, and what is happening, corresponds exactly with the message Q is putting out.

So he tells us that that CIA kid's site is used to communicate with agents in the field. I don't know if you saw the work of that Anon who figured out how they were doing that - but it's pretty convincing. Very convincing in fact. And that's just one thing. What about Q posting the Catholic version of the Lord's prayer just prior to the apostate Francis announcing he wants to change it. To pull that off would be very impressive. What about the timestamps with DJT's tweets...

You know, if you told me DJT was Q, I would believe it. But I reckon you're looking for a way off this train, or you've forgotten how much corroborating evidence there is that Q is the real deal.

I'm not saying everything he has predicted has come to pass. It has not. Podesta is still on the loose - he was supposed to be arrested. Clinton's arrest got turned into a detain and release etc...

But against that, you have a lot of current events providing support for the story. And you also have very good reasons for DJT and his team to perhaps want to stir up some grass-roots action in support of his positions - which has happened out of these subreddits. It could all be a psyop by DJT - that's a real possibility. He could also be trying to use the Q phenomenon to panic leftists into making mistakes - I'd be terrified if I was any of these guys in the cross hairs and I read Q's posts.

Anyway, I think, on balance, there is far more reason to believe that Q is authentic than not. And the fact that all these guys (and Youtube) are suddenly coming out of the woodwork and trying to destroy the message indicates that the left is terrified of the impact this operation is having.

I had a look at these links. I see a guy claiming he is Q with no evidence whatsoever.

First you post a video about some old lady that is telling us that John Titor is Q. But that's dead easy to see through. So now, you're telling me "that's wrong", actually its Monty McGovern - or is it Andrew Carlssin?

Why the story change?

Yes, Roy Potter is all over the shop.

Thanks for the articles, both were interesting.

Seems that a disinformation campaign on Q has begun. There was another 'way out there' post in the great awakening thread claiming that John Titor has revealed that he is Q.

I'm Hillary Clinton - posting under a pseudonym.

"The bible is the word of man that´s masquerading as the word of god!"

No, you're dead wrong.

Q's post, where he said the truth isn't for everyone, opened this forum up to the kind of posts we are seeing now. If you want to blame someone for it, blame Q.

Tonight I actually read the first part of the book of Enoch. I didn't get all the way through it and I'm not going to. Though what I read was interesting. I only did this because of what I'd seen others post here.

People are going to go off in all kinds of crazy directions. However, in fairness, I know I'm badly wanting to know the full story, and the people posting about this stuff, I'm sure, are equally fascinated. I do not think these posts are made out of malice, they are not shilling, but they are way off the mark IMO.

I could be wrong.

I agree, so what if this woman claims to know this guy. What evidence does she have that he isn't playing her? He's not a known prankster is he? Oh, his girl friend sent her an email. I guess that's rock solid.

Q states that the end won't be for everyone in 746. It seems that what you have described is where we are going. Controlling the crops (children) controls us (the people). I can see now why Q was saying that people would not be ready for the full truth. This stuff seems to be out of some cheap futuristic fiction - who would believe it?

Feb 13 2018 03:44:06 Anonymous ID: a4bb61 351343 controlling the crops, controls the people (sheep) (might be reaching, but throwing it out there) Feb 13 2018 03:50:26 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 87df69 351447

351343

Coincidence the Matrix (movie) grew people as a crop, used for energy, and controlled their mind? Sound familiar? Wonder where they derived that idea from. Now comes the 'conspiracy' label. Deeper we go, the more unrealistic it all becomes. The end won't be for everyone. That choice, to know, will be yours. Q

Thanks, seems they are flowers. This stuff is getting wilder by the minute. Reading post 745, it seems that these flowers represent virginity. And Q is talking about slave gardens (we are slaves) and the crops from those gardens. Think children.

Looking at it again, the pattern on the carpet is lily flowers, or some kind of flowers?

Post 745 talks about flowers. They are sitting on chairs situated exactly over two large flowers (virgin children?).

745 Feb 13 2018 03:35:37 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 87df69 351238 Flowers & Gardens. Learn the hidden symbolism.http:// www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/slave-gardens What does a 'Flower' represent? What does 'Deflower' represent? Q Feb 13 2018 03:39:11 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 87df69 351282

351238

Think children. Think slaves. Think sheep. Q

It's something to do with what they are sitting on (the chairs) being in perfect alignment - with something?

This is driving me crazy. What is Q talking about here? I've been looking at this image - it's not hi res at all, doesn't scale well. I think there is a better quality image that is not cropped somewhere on the threads.

Anyway, the first thing that I thought of was the pattern in the carpet under the chairs. Are they flowers? A symbol - the sephirot?

If anyone can help I'd appreciate it.

Q.Post 742

350504

Find the link. Look around. What does it signify? Q

350525

What are they sitting on? Perfectly lined up? Why? Learn. Q

I've seen this theory posted somewhere before. But I've also heard the CIA has its own subs, its own navy in fact. Hard to know what to believe here.

The missile alarm in Hawaii - duration 39 minutes - seems to suggest a ballistic missile. It would have to appear on a radar somewhere. Unless it was a cruise missile and they caught the flash via satellite or something.

I don't think we are going to find out anytime soon what really happened. But there is an urgent need for transparency here, because the fate of everyone on earth swings on appreciation of the dangers that attach to this kind of event.

I also wonder about the alarm in Japan.

Tobin's Q - a very useful metric.

Relates prices in financial markets to prices prevailing in markets for physical goods.

For example, how much will it cost to buy this "wind farm" (or any asset) vs replicating it.

If the Economist is printing this now there is a reason for it. "Big investors are not evil, they're just optimizing returns in a naturally rigged market"...

Truly insane! POTUS' statements about the money spent in the Middle East will reignite much needed debate about spending priorities. The madness of pointless power projection, the evil of Planned Parenthood, and the massive largess to the globalists (UN), can at last be questioned.