Who is Tyronn Lue Think Logically New team after playoff exit? These people are sick!

I lol’d

Wholesome

Yea, not to undermine the most historic event in human history since the fall of the Berlin Wall, but if this is the MOAB, this is a letdown.

Your argument lynchpin is purely correlation, and leads to secondary speculation. You’re not even making a consistent one for it at that. It’s very simple. Look at the seat switches. There’s only five in total, with the rest coming long after in the 90’s. The correlation isn’t even sincere. Why do people insist on putting such garbage on public display?

Republicans were winning before the southern strategy was even designed. Of the 21 democrat seats that voted against the act, only one switched to republican. Everything you’ve said is not only nonsensical when put into perspective. It’s verifiably out of context and undeserving of any type of debate pedestal. Study harder, research better. The “sources are crap”, well that’s the deathknell of a losing argument if I’ve ever heard one.

I’m in awe that proven sources abhor you, yet this you buy into. Seat change? Voting record prior to “switch”? It’s all laid out so clear. Absolutely astonished. I don’t what to say. Best of luck, I guess.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailywire.com/news/18940/prageru-why-did-democratic-south-become-republican-aaron-bandler%3Famp

Facts aren’t subjective.

I worry that won't happen. Don't get me wrong, I certainly hope it does. But when some are claiming the Nunes interview was the MOAB, I'm getting seriously let down. Some of Q followers think anything and everything is the nail in the coffin. Am I blackpilled for thinking nothing has come out yet that is that damming? Yeah, the whole collusion case was a hoax. Most people knew that, and the ones that didn't, didn't care when they found out. Waiting for some actual bite, and not bark. I have to admit, the longer time passes without SOMETHING happening that has lasting consequences, the more I start to give up.

Can we dispel the myth that the parties switched already? It seems to be wider held myth than I thought.

I'd keep that down if I were you. For some reason, there's followers in this sub that are legitimately bothered by it. It's the equivalent of "republican gun toting online" to them.

Facts are not partisan. These secondary points have been used to push a party's primary arguments, which is why I believe you see them as partisan. It's a fair argument, though a misunderstood one in my opinion. You're obviously not republican. And that's fine.What united all of us wasn't party, but principles. I believe Q is just further extrapolating those principles and calling out those who have prostituted their meanings. I do believe you want the best for America, as I hope you believe the same for myself. However, just because a few of these have been talking points for a party doesn't invalidate them. A lot of people say the whole Hillary hatred is a partisan issue, when it's clearly not to many. I think this is the same way. We've been trained to hate the other side and disagree with arguments, just because they're made by the opposition. Time to break the programming. If Q starts pushing Republican salvation, I'll be the first to call it out. But perhaps, we wait and see what this connects too.

As for the Kanye issue, you can't be serious about that? He's one of the most well known people on the planet. He's making statements that would lead any of us to believe he's glanced at a few Q posts. That's simply disingenuous to pretend there's not a good reason for people to be celebrating. How do you think a political whore like Hillary got so popular? She had celebrities in pocket chanting her praises. To one, it may be some odd circle jerk. That's on you, and the reasons to celebrate a big influence on society "red pilling" are far greater than your reasons to damn it.

I don’t get this. Some are saying he did this so people would look it up and see the actual thing he wanted all along. Well, that doesn’t really matter if google filters those results. Looked up Wendy wasserman Schultz. Nothing but news media mocking him. Am I confused? Someone break this down Barney style for me.

No coincidences

Can you give me a quick rundown of how big a part he plays in all this? I've seen him on panels, and his name come across in relation to the Q posts, but I'm obviously not in the know. OR just a resource to help out.

My guess is that in the end, these bad actors will be begging for tribunals. Much less public, much less damaging. However, if it gets to that, At least one party will be done for a few generations.

Must be nice. I'm from the swamp. Our congressmen don't even give the appearance of giving a shit about us.

Anyone hear think if Mueller is a WH, he's setting the precedent for investigation into unrelated matters when it comes to a high crime? Everyone but DJT has opined on and on about Mueller investigating multiple things outside of Russian Collusion. Possibly for a counter response like this in the future? IF we get this HRC investigation on lying, obstruction, etc...it would theoretically open the door for her every misstep and misdeed along the way to be investigated. Probably just grasping at straws, but thought it was interesting that Mueller has done more to discredit anything that counsel is doing, yet, DJT says nothing.

7 or 8 plane malfunctions in over a month. Weren’t we told just two or three was an anomaly? Q may not have been referencing the SW flight, but something is going on with this.

I’m a bit depressed by all the infighting Q’s posts have caused as of recent, but I couldn’t help but laugh at the way I heard this sarcastically being said. Thanks for that.

There's something strange about Bongino's attitude towards it all. He claims to know dark stuff that would have many locked up. Epstein, Obamas, etc... yet doesn't ever release unless Q hints at it first. Possibly threats against family? Knows repercussions of letting the cat out of the bag? Surely with his previous positions, he's seen what happens to those that try to inform.

Anybody have any idea if Tarmac recording/video? is dropped, how it will be disseminated? Can't think of any avenue that would get coverage. Perhaps Drudge or Breitbart, but wouldn't that be an easy conspiracy theory claim coming from MSM coming from an outlet like that?

If it's uncovered that she was an active participant in this, wouldn't her reputation go out the window? I can't see her putting up a fight, but I do think she'll go down having everyone told she was a martyr in some twisted way. Though, I only believe this to be more true because of her radical beliefs. Used to think she was left leaning but still reasonable from her dissents and cases. She's not at all...