Truth Seeker ID: 10ea52 COVID-19 and HCQ General July 5, 2020, 1:35 p.m. No.2089   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2518 >>2527 >>2580 >>2607 >>2803 >>3037 >>3041 >>3042 >>3640 >>3750 >>4020 >>4667

Refute fake news about the novel coronavirus and with facts and credible experts.

Added HCQ-Hydroxychloroquine to thread description - 26July2020

 

No One Has Died from the Coronavirus says respected pathologist Dr. Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association.

–It's impossible to create a vaccine for it, since viruses mutate rapidly

–CDC tests deliberately miscount cases

–Testing is fraudulent; no specific novel-coronavirus-antibodies have been found

–There is no proof that specific RNA fragments caused illness, or may have been present in the body of a healthy person

–COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection

–Fatal outcomes from causes like heart attack, brain hemorrhage, or aneurysm being fraudulently classified as COVID-19

–Pathologists find no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly.

 

This is a GENERAL thread. You may post facts, relevant information, articles, and graphics. You may discuss the topic and the materials posted.

 

Off-topic posts are subject to removal without warning. No shitposting in this thread.

Truth Seeker ID: 10ea52 No One Has Died from the Coronavirus says Dr. Stoian Alexov July 5, 2020, 1:48 p.m. No.2090   🗄️.is 🔗kun

“No One Has Died from the Coronavirus”

Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association

By Rosemary Frei and Patrick Corbett

Global Research, July 03, 2020

 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/no-one-has-died-coronavirus/5717668

 

A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.

 

Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.

 

Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.

 

He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.

 

These stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.

 

They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies (which are beginning to be used to treat patients).

 

Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).

 

And they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of theCOVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.

 

Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.

 

The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.

 

We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English. We then transcribed her translation. The video is here and our English transcript is here.

 

Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.

 

The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology. This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.

 

Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.

 

It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘conspiracy theorist.’ After all many people believe they’re everywhere these days, spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues.

 

In addition, little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings.

 

But keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly.

 

Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.

 

On top of that, there’s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying.

 

For example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.

 

“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:

 

In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present, for example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”

 

Also, one of us (Rosemary) and another journalist, Amory Devereux, documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch’s postulates.

 

These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease. We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.

 

In addition, in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, added to the evidence that “the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.”

 

The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”

 

Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:

 

the main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”

 

He added that:

 

What all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”

 

Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus (presenting as interstitial pneumonia) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases.

 

Another revelation of his is that:

 

“We need to see exactly how the law will deal with immunization and that vaccine that we’re all talking about, because I’m certain it’s [currently] not possible to create a vaccine against COVID. I’m not sure what exactly Bill Gates is doing with his laboratories – is it really a vaccine he’s producing, or something else?”

 

As pointed to above, the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines, serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost. In fact, there is no solid evidence the virus exists.

 

Dr. Alexov made still more important points. For example, he noted that, in contrast to the seasonal influenza, SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been proven to kill youth:

 

[With the flu] we can find one virus which can cause a young person to die with no other illness present […] In other words, the coronavirus infection is an infection that does not lead to death. And the flu can lead to death.”

 

(There have been reports of severe maladies such as Kawasaki-like disease and stroke in young people who were deemed to have a novel-coronavirus infection. However, the majority of published papers on these cases are very short and include only one or only a small handful of patients. Moreover, commenters on the papers note it’s impossible to determine the role of the virus because the papers’ authors did not control sufficiently, if at all, for confounding factors. It’s most likely that children’s deaths attributed to COVID-19 in fact are from multiple organ failure resulting from the combination of the drug cocktail and ventilation that these children are subjected to.)

 

Dr. Alexov therefore asserted that:

 

the WHO is creating worldwide chaos, with no real facts behind what they’re saying.”

 

Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19. As a result, reported Dr. Alexov, by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria.

 

Also, the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19.

 

“That’s quite stressful for us, and for me in particular, because we have protocols and procedures which we need to use,” he told Dr. Katsarov. “…And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say, ‘Hey, those pathologists didn’t know what they were doing [when they said the cause of death was COVID-19]!’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses, because they could be proven [or disproven], and they could be checked again later.”

 

He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe, as well as in China, Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone:

 

I’m really sad that we need to follow the [WHO’s] instructions without even thinking about them. But in Germany, France, Italy and England they’re starting to think that we shouldn’t follow the WHO so strictly, and [instead] when we’re writing the cause of death we should have some pathology [results to back that up] and we should follow the protocol. [That’s because] when we say something we need to be able to prove it.”

 

(He added that autopsies could have helped confirm or disprove the theory that many of the people deemed to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had previously received the H1N1 flu vaccine. Because, as he noted, the vaccine suppresses adults’ immune systems and therefore may have been a significant contributor to their deaths by making them much more susceptible to infection.)

 

Drs. Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns, combined with the emptying of hospitals (ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients), halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments.

 

They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19.

 

We know that stress significantly suppresses the immune system, so I can really claim 200% that all the chronic diseases will be more severe and more acute per se. Specifically in situ carcinoma – over 50% of these are going to become more invasive […] So I will say that this epidemic isn’t so much an epidemic of the virus, it’s an epidemic of giving people a lot of fear and stress.”

 

In addition, posited Dr. Alexov, as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians.

 

Because in my opinion the coronavirus isn’t that dangerous, and how are people going to have trust in me doing cancer pathology, much of which is related to viruses as well? But nobody is talking about that.”

 

We emailed Dr. Alexov several questions, including asking why he believes it’s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.

 

He didn’t answer the questions directly. Dr. Alexov instead responded:

 

We also emailed five of Dr. Alexov’s colleagues in the European Pathology Society asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov’s revelations. We followed up by telephone with two of them. None responded.

 

Why didn’t Dr. Alexov or his five colleagues answer our questions?

 

We doubt it’s due to lack of English proficiency.

 

It’s more likely because of the pressure on pathologists to follow the WHO’s directives and not speak out publicly. (And, on top of that, pathology departments depend on governments for their funding.)

 

Nonetheless, pathologists like Drs. Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection.

 

Perhaps that’s because pathologists’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests, signs and symptoms. And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly.

 

*

 

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

 

Rosemary Frei has an MSc in molecular biology from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Calgary, was a freelance medical writer and journalist for 22 years and now is an independent investigative journalist. You can watch her June 15 interview on The Corbett Report, read her otherOff-Guardian articles and follow her on Twitter.

 

Patrick Corbett is a retired writer, producer, director and editor who’s worked for every major network in Canada and the US except for Fox. His journalistic credits include Dateline NBC, CTV’s W-5 and the CTV documentary unit where he wrote and directed ‘Children’s Hospital’, the first Canadian production to be nominated for an International Emmy. You can follow Patrick on Twitter.

Truth Seeker ID: 10ea52 Huge COVID case-counting deception at the CDC by John Rappoport July 5, 2020, 1:50 p.m. No.2091   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2100

Huge COVID case-counting deception at the CDC

by John Rappoport

July 2, 2020

 

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/07/02/huge-covid-case-counting-deception-at-the-cdc/

 

For this piece, we have to enter the official world (of the insane)—where everyone is quite sure a new coronavirus was discovered in China and the worthless diagnostic tests mean something and the case numbers are real and meaningful. Once we execute all those absurd maneuvers, we land square in the middle of yet another scandal—this time at our favorite US agency for scandals, the CDC.

 

The Atlantic, May 21, has the story, headlined, “How could the CDC make that mistake?”

 

I’ll give you the key quotes, and then comment on the stark inference The Atlantic somehow failed to grasp.

 

“We’ve learned that the CDC is making, at best, a debilitating mistake: combining test results that diagnose current coronavirus infections with test results that measure whether someone has ever had the virus…The agency confirmed to The Atlantic on Wednesday that it is mixing the results of viral [PCR] and antibody tests, even though the two tests reveal different information and are used for different reasons.”

 

“Several states—including Pennsylvania, the site of one of the country’s largest outbreaks, as well as Texas, Georgia, and Vermont—are blending the data in the same way. Virginia likewise mixed viral and antibody test results until last week, but it reversed course and the governor apologized for the practice after it was covered by the Richmond Times-Dispatch and The Atlantic. Maine similarly separated its data on Wednesday; Vermont authorities claimed they didn’t even know they were doing this.”

 

“’You’ve got to be kidding me,’ Ashish Jha, the K. T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard and the director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, told us when we described what the CDC was doing. ‘How could the CDC make that mistake? This is a mess’.”

 

“The CDC stopped publishing anything resembling a complete database of daily [COVID] test results on February 29. When it resumed publishing test data last week [the middle of May]…”

 

First of all, the CDC’s basic mission is publishing disease statistics on an ongoing basis. Reporting partial data flies in the face of what they’re supposed to be all about.

 

But the big deal, of course, is combining results from two different tests—the PCR and the antibody—and placing them in one lump.

 

I’ve read the Atlantic article forwards, backwards, and sideways, and it appears the experts believe only PCR viral tests should be used to count the number of COVID cases.

 

So here is a takeaway I find nowhere in the Atlantic article: COMBINING THE TWO TESTS WILL VASTLY INFLATE THE NUMBER OF CASES.

 

I’m not talking about categories like “rate of infection” or “percentage.” I’m talking about plain numbers of cases.

 

Some PCR tests will indicate COVID and some antibody tests will indicate COVID, and adding them together will pump up the number of cases. You know, that big number they flash on TV screens a hundred times a day.

 

“Coronavirus cases jumped up again yesterday, and the grand total in the US is now…”

 

THAT number.

 

The number media and government and related con artists deploy to scare the people and justify lockdowns and use to stop reopening the economy.

 

The brass band circus with flying acrobats and elephants and clown numbers.

 

Therefore, I’m not characterizing what the CDC is doing as a mistake. They’ve managed to create the illusion that absolute case numbers are higher than they should be.

 

Somehow, these “mistakes” always seem to result in worse news, not better news. The “errors” are always on the high side rather than the low side.

 

Case in point: the computer prediction of COVID deaths in the UK and US made by that abject failure, Neil Ferguson, whose track record, going back to 2001, has been one horrendous lunatic exaggeration after another. His 2020 projections of 500,000 COVID deaths in the UK and two million in the US were directly used to justify lockdowns in many countries.

 

The CDC, back in 2009, stopped reporting the number of Swine Flu cases in the US—while still claiming that number was in the tens of thousands. I’ve written in great detail about the scandal, which was exposed by then-CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson. The CDC stopped counting cases, because the overwhelming percentage of tissue samples from patients was coming back from labs with no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu. And yet, in a later retrospective “analysis,” the CDC claimed that, at the height of the “epidemic,” there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.

 

Going all the way back to 2003 and SARS, the CDC and other public health agencies around the world hyped the dangers to the sky; the final official death count, globally, when the dust cleared? 800.

 

There is a tradition of lying on the high side, blowing up figures in order to create the illusion of destruction.

 

CDC? Mistake? The agency is certainly incompetent. But that’s just the beginning of the story.

 

The only time they say there is no danger is when they’re lying about the effects of vaccines.

 

My headline for the Atlantic article would read: SO HOW MANY COVID CASES SHOULD WE SUBTRACT TO GET THE ACTUAL NUMBER?

 

And the first paragraph would go this way: “Just when governors are trying to reopen their economies, a gigantic case-counting deception at the CDC is taking the wind out of their sails. The millions of Americans suffering financial devastation could be pushed back into a hole. Who is screaming to high heaven about THAT on the nightly news? No one. Why not?”

 

SOURCES:

 

  • https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/05/cdc-and-states-are-misreporting-covid-19-test-data-pennsylvania-georgia-texas/611935/

 

  • https://banned.video/watch?id=5efd0c2a672706002f3a8501 (video: “CDC Admits Mistakes in Covid Case Numbers,” 7/1/2020)

 

  • https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/tag/neil-ferguson/

 

  • https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/news/20091112/over-22-million-in-us-had-h1n1-swine-flu#1

Truth Seeker ID: 10ea52 Texas Doctor Reverses Coronavirus Symptoms In 100% Of Cases With Inexpensive Treatment July 5, 2020, 1:55 p.m. No.2092   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Texas Doctor Reverses Coronavirus Symptoms In 100% Of Cases With Inexpensive Treatment

 

Texas family doctor Dr. Richard Bartlett joins Debbie Georgatos on her show American Can We Talk to discuss a potential COVID CURE!

 

Dr. Bartlett describes how he has been treating Covid-19 patients with 100% success rate using an inexpensive safe treatment that is commonly used for people with asthma.

 

The treatment is enhaling a steroid called budesonide using a nebulizer. Dr. Bartlett says many patients experience rapid relief from Covid symptoms after the first treatment.

 

It’s the same treatment that worked in crowded countries like Taiwan, Singapore and Japan who’ve had very few deaths compared to countries that locked down. Therefore, Bartlett questions the effectiveness of mandatory masks, social distancing or a vaccine.

 

He explained that a vaccine is unnecessary because the mortality rate is so low and effective treatments already exist. And he emphasized that vaccines would be ineffective because of constant mutations to the coronavirus.

 

“The beautiful thing about the treatment that using is that no matter how many times it mutates it’s universally going to work because it decreases the inflammation. It’s a respiratory anti-inlammatory solution to a respiratory inlammatory problem.”

 

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naturalblaze/~3/li0eEvdXaJQ/texas-doctor-reverses-coronavirus-symptoms-in-100-of-cases-with-inexpensive-treatment.html

 

https://youtu.be/eDSDdwN2Xcg

Truth Seeker ID: 10ea52 Facemasks raise inhaled CO2 to toxic level within seconds July 5, 2020, 6:21 p.m. No.2099   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/9867758

>YOU MIGHT AS WELL PUT A PLASTIC BAG OVER YOUR HEAD.

>THE TOXICITY OF THE FACE MASKS, LIVE!! The levels of CO2 are off the charts, measured by the host of the show.

>You can see this video and others of this sort on our youtube channel: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lFkRojpP2No

>Retweet to let everyone know of this danger

>https://twitter.com/AlexJungle2/status/1279868034602147841

Truth Seeker ID: 9717b2 July 5, 2020, 6:43 p.m. No.2100   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2102

Thanks for the thread anon.

 

The entire lockdown/mask narrative hinges on the daily rising case count.

The case count is based on the CDC's 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020.

https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/case-definition/2020/

 

Let's take a look:

<CSTE realizes that field investigations will involve evaluations of persons with no symptoms and these individuals will need to be counted as cases.

Admission that positive cases include asymptomatic individuals.

 

<Criteria to Distinguish a New Case from an Existing Case

<Not applicable (N/A) until more virologic data are available.

Lack of clarity infers that there is a possibility that a single person is being counted as more than one case.

This has not been updated even after 3 months and millions of tests.

 

Criteria definitions in pics.

<Case Classification

<Probable

<Meets clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID-19.

For example, if a person has a cough and has been in contact with a person who has a cough, that is considered a probable positive case.

Or a person can have a headache and feel like they have a fever (without taking their temperature) and has traveled to or lives in an area that is considered as having a "sustained ongoing community transmission", that is considered a probable positive case.

There are many more possible examples.

 

<Meets presumptive laboratory evidence AND either clinical criteria OR epidemiologic evidence.

For example, anyone in the area with "sustained ongoing community transmission" that tests positive on an antibody test (even though it may not be accurate), is considered a probable positive case.

Many more possible examples.

 

<Meets vital records criteria with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID-19.

Anyone who died who had COVID-19 listed on their death certificate whether they were lab tested or not is considered a probable positive case.

 

<Confirmed

<Meets confirmatory laboratory evidence.

Confirmatory laboratory evidence is defined as:

Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical specimen using a molecular amplification detection test

 

Now here's the kicker:

According to the CDC, the CASE COUNT INCLUDES BOTH CONFIRMED AND PROBABLE CASES

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html

<As of April 14, 2020, CDC case counts and death counts include both confirmed and probable cases and deaths. This change was made to reflect an interim COVID-19 position statement pdf iconexternal iconissued by the Council for State and Territorial Epidemiologists on April 5, 2020. The position statement included a case definition and made COVID-19 a nationally notifiable disease. Nationally notifiable disease cases are voluntarily reported to CDC by jurisdictions.

 

Thus the situation is even worse than what Jon Rappaport wrote about,

>>2091

>The agency confirmed to The Atlantic on Wednesday that it is mixing the results of viral [PCR] and antibody tests, even though the two tests reveal different information and are used for different reasons.”

 

because as you can plainly see, there is an EXTREMELY LOW BAR to be considered a probable positive case.

As in for example, you don't even need a test if a contract tracer happens to find you and discovers that you may have a qualified symptom.

 

How many people that are buying into the fearmongering are aware of this?

Would they buy into the fearmongering so easily if they were made aware?

Why isn't there one single news organization or a government official anywhere in the U.S. that is clearly stating what a case actually is to the American people?

\

Truth Seeker ID: 10ea52 July 5, 2020, 7:16 p.m. No.2101   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://twitter.com/Labrie8/status/1279660494903635968

 

Canadian Yoda

@Labrie8

Remember Sweden? Remember Sweden had no lockdown? Remember how medical geniuses, such as Fauci and Tam said Sweden would really suffer huge casualties from Wuhan virus? Well, the opposite is happening. Deaths are small, and falling. What does that tell you about the experts?

Image

12:16 AM · Jul 5, 2020 PDT

Truth Seeker ID: 93175b July 5, 2020, 8:17 p.m. No.2103   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2104 >>2106

>>2102

Good question.

Get it to Musk maybe?

He's been discussing testing and been getting attacked by "experts" with irrelevant arguments over it.

They're completely ignoring the evidence that you don't even need a test to be considered a positive case.

And why isn't the CDC breaking out how many are confirmed and how many are probable?

This is a masterclass on deception.

 

https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1278324660900229120

Truth Seeker ID: 0e3f3e July 5, 2020, 9:08 p.m. No.2104   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2119

>>2103

An anon (well it was AFLB, a sick persona(s) ridden with ulterior motives, so take with grain of salt) in QR said this:

 

>>>/qresearch/9870771

>Pushing that the virus is fake from the start, helps china dodge international retribution for RELEASING A BIOWEAPON USED TO SHAPE FOREIGN POLITICAL LANDSCAPES.

 

I don't know how to reconcile that dilemma. We need to get our country back open, despite that China thought they were slamming us with a bioweapon that turned out to be sort of a dud.

The bioweapon PLUS the draconian social controls is the real weapon. A 2-part weapon that became more lethal when both parts were deployed together.

Truth Seeker ID: 0e3f3e COVID-19 Mortality almost 0% for those under 45 July 5, 2020, 9:18 p.m. No.2105   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Stanford Doctor Confirms What We’ve Been Saying for Months – For People Under Age 45 the COVID-19 Mortality Rate is Almost 0%

 

The China coronavirus is real but the facts about it have been hidden or contaminated. For example, a doctor at Stanford reported a couple days ago that the China coronavirus mortality rate for those under the age of 45 is almost 0%.

The Washington Examiner reported:

Stanford University’s disease prevention chairman slammed using statewide lockdown measures as a response to the coronavirus, saying they were implemented based on bad data and inaccurate modeling.

“There are already more than 50 studies that have presented results on how many people in different countries and locations have developed antibodies to the virus,” Dr. John Ioannidis said during a recent interview with Greek Reporter. “Of course, none of these studies are perfect, but cumulatively, they provide useful composite evidence. A very crude estimate might suggest that about 150-300 million or more people have already been infected around the world, far more than the 10 million documented cases.”

Ioannidis pointed out the mortality rate is low among young people who have contracted the virus.

“The death rate in a given country depends a lot on the age structure, who are the people infected, and how they are managed,” Ioannidis said. “For people younger than 45, the infection fatality rate is almost 0%. For 45 to 70, it is probably about 0.05%-0.3%. For those above 70, it escalates substantially.”

We’ve been reporting the same or similar for months.

On May 20th we reported: END THE LOCKDOWN: Pennsylvania Has More COVID-19 Deaths Over Age 100 than Under Age 45

On May 20th we reported: END THE LOCKDOWN: UK has More COVID-19 Deaths Over Age 90 than Under Age 64

On May 16th we reported: If you are under Age 29 You Are More Likely to Drown than Die from Coronavirus

On May 3rd we reported: Less than 1% of New York City Coronavirus Fatalities (0.61%) had NO Underlying Health Conditions

These are just a couple of the posts we’ve published on the coronavirus impact on working age Americans and children. Stop the insanity and let’s protect our elderly and sick (like we said in March) and put the country back to work.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/stanford-doctor-confirms-saying-months-people-age-45-covid-19-mortality-rate-almost-0/

Truth Seeker ID: a54d0d July 6, 2020, 3:10 a.m. No.2119   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2104

>Pushing that the virus is fake from the start, helps china dodge international retribution

Happen to agree with that particular statement but that's a completely separate issue from the case count.

Best not to conflate them otherwise the other side is going to scream that people are questioning the case count because they think the virus is fake.

 

The case count inflation is NOT a conspiracy theory, it's from the CDC's own documents.

The objectives imo should be

  • Show people that the case count INCLUDES PROBABLE CASES and possible double/triple/more counting.

  • Show people that probable cases include a wide range of criteria (not needing a test, "subjective fever", etc) with a large margin for error (not good science).

  • Show people that they need to demand that CDC break the case count into 2 categories: CONFIRMED & PROBABLE.

  • Get the CDC to further breakdown the probable cases into what criteria is being applied.

  • Get the CDC to clarify whether individuals are being counted as more than one case.

This should not be difficult for them to do - they have the data, they're just hiding it.

 

>>2106

He's also got a big ego who's losing a battle of egos with a bunch of people with big egos and this would help him win, so it's in his interest to expose it.

Just an idea to help get it out quickly.

Tom Fitton maybe? idk.

Does POTUS know about the case definitions?

 

All I know is that everyone should really be made aware of what is being counted as a positive case.

They are using this case count statistic as a hammer to bludgeon the entire population.

It's time to stop it until they can clarify their own numbers.

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 92199b July 6, 2020, 7:25 a.m. No.2155   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Wuhan Institute of Virology

 

>The Wuhan Institute of Virology… is a research institute on virology administered by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)… it opened mainland China's first biosafety level 4 (BSL–4) laboratory in 2015.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuhan_Institute_of_Virology

 

Zhengli Shi

 

>Prof. Shi is the director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Her group has discovered diverse novel viruses/virus antibodies in bats, including SARS-like coronaviruses

 

http://archive.md/htH44

 

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) proteins of different bat species confer variable susceptibility to SARS-CoV entry.

 

>Zhengli Shi

 

>Here, we extended our previous study to ACE2 molecules from seven additional bat species and tested their interactions with human SARS-CoV spike protein using both HIV-based pseudotype and live SARS-CoV infection assays.

 

http://archive.md/fPAVF

 

Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor

 

>Zheng-Li Shi

 

>Chinese horseshoe bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-CoV, and that intermediate hosts may not be necessary for direct human infection by some bat SL-CoVs.

 

http://archive.md/DMlCO

 

A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

 

>Zheng-Li Shi

 

>Here we examine the disease potential of a SARS-like virus, SHC014-CoV, which is currently circulating in Chinese horseshoe bat populations… we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that… a wild-type backbone can efficiently use multiple orthologs of the SARS receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2), replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells and achieve in vitro titers equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV.

 

http://archive.md/tklSO

 

Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research

 

>An experiment that created a hybrid version of a bat coronavirus — one related to the virus that causes SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) — has triggered renewed debate over whether engineering lab variants of viruses with possible pandemic potential is worth the risks.

 

>The researchers created a chimaeric virus, made up of… the backbone of a SARS virus that had been adapted to grow in mice and to mimic human disease. The chimaera infected human airway cells

 

>“If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,”

 

http://archive.md/SReX0

 

A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin

 

>Zheng-Li Shi

 

>we report the identification and characterization of a new coronavirus (2019-nCoV), which caused an epidemic of acute respiratory syndrome in humans in Wuhan, China.

 

>The sequences are almost identical and share 79.6% sequence identity to SARS-CoV… we show that 2019-nCoV is 96% identical at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus.

 

>Notably, we confirmed that 2019-nCoV uses the same cell entry …(ACE2)—as SARS-CoV.

 

http://archive.md/A1PEP

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 92199b July 6, 2020, 7:28 a.m. No.2156   🗄️.is 🔗kun

CoVID 19:

 

Variants of Covid by area:

 

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.21.001586v1.abstract

 

Fetal Hemoglobin binds oxygen better than adults in COVID positive children

 

https://osf.io/vzmf3/

 

Comparison CIVID to SARS

 

https://osf.io/hw34x

 

Neurologic Invasion in COVID

 

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202004.0382/v1

 

Study on Asymptomatic COVID

 

https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(20)30156-0/abstract

 

ACE2 Deficiency and COVID

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953620520301515

 

Lymphocyte and Cytokine response to COVID

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7165294/

 

Immune changes in COVID19

 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/22221751.2020.1746199

 

Lymphocyte death in COVID19 and sepsis

 

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30920-X/fulltext

 

COVID19 infect T Lymphocytes:

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41423-020-0424-9

 

Coronavirus could attack immune system like HIV by targeting protective cells

 

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079443/coronavirus-could-target-immune-system-targeting-protective

 

Photo therapy:

 

http://www.benoitlessard.com/news/2015/1/26/from-chloro-to-fluoro-expanding-the-role-of-aluminum-phthalocyanine-in-organic-photovoltaic-devices

 

http://www.cytoluminator.com/virus.html

 

https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2019/pp/c9pp00211a#!divAbstract

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29997579

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 92199b July 6, 2020, 7:29 a.m. No.2157   🗄️.is 🔗kun

2007 Paper by Chi Scientists on how they would make the bioweapon corona mixed with HIV – COVID

 

https://jvi.asm.org/content/jvi/early/2007/12/12/JVI.01085-07.full.pdf

 

COVID19 in Spleen and Lymph nodes and the 169+ Macrophage and Lymphocyte damage:

 

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.27.20045427v1

 

More on CD169+ Macrophage and how it works:

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212557/

 

Cats and Ferrets highly susceptible to COVID19, shows infection spread between them:

 

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/04/07/science.abb7015

 

OFR8 the part (nonfunctional0 area of SARS investigations to change to make SARS more infectious:

 

https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/213/4/579/2459467

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26269185

 

2015 Paper on Corona Viruses and how to make them a Pandemic:

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985

https://archive.is/GtZ78

 

TMPRSS2 Mechanism part of pathogenesis for COVID19:

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/tmprss2

 

More on Pseudo HIV

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166093407003254

 

Lymphocyte and Cytokine response to COVID

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7165294/

 

Immune changes in COVID19

 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/22221751.2020.1746199

 

Lymphocyte death in COVID19 and sepsis

 

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30920-X/fulltext

 

COVID19 infect T Lymphocytes:

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41423-020-0424-9

 

Coronavirus could attack immune system like HIV by targeting protective cells

 

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3079443/coronavirus-could-target-immune-system-targeting-protective

 

Please note 2 of these scholarly articles say bad antibody response and one says good.

 

No evidence antibodies protect against COVID19.

 

https://time.com/5827450/who-coronavirus-antibodies-reinfection/

 

science studies:

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32221519

 

The potential danger of suboptimal antibody responses in COVID-19

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-020-0321-6

 

Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309920301961

 

Conclusion no neutralizing antibodies in natural infection

 

Neutralizing Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and Other Human Coronaviruses

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471490620300570

 

Human monoclonal antibody to COVID19

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41423-020-0426-7

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 92199b July 6, 2020, 7:30 a.m. No.2158   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Gain of function

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4996883/

 

>Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens.

 

Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/

 

Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding

 

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30251-8/fulltext

 

Preliminary evidence from a multicenter prospective observational 1 study of the safety and efficacy of chloroquine for the treatment of 2 COVID-19

 

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.26.20081059v1.full.pdf

 

Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein

 

https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(20)30262-2

 

The Effect of Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on the Corrected QT Interval in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection

 

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008662#.XrG-i8LBjDA.twitter

 

https://sci-hub.tw/https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008662

 

Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag

 

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2.full.pdf

 

A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985

 

The next SARS?

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro.2015.17

 

The Effect of Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on the Corrected QT Interval in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection

 

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008662#.XrG-i8LBjDA.twitter

 

EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

 

https://data.epo.org/publication-server/pdf-document?pn=3172319&ki=B1&cc=EP&pd=20191120

 

HUMAN BETACORONAVIRUS LINEAGE C AND IDENTIFICATION OF N-TERMINAL DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE AS ITS VIRUS RECEPTOR

 

https://data.epo.org/publication-server/pdf-document?pn=2898067&ki=B1&cc=EP&pd=20200115

 

CORONAVIRUS ISOLATED FROM HUMANS

 

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf

 

Manipulation of the coronavirus genome using targeted RNA recombination with interspecies chimeric coronaviruses.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19057874

 

Early Hydroxychloroquine Is Associated with an Increase of Survival in COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Study

 

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202005.0057/v1

 

Early treatment of COVID-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: A retrospective analysis of 1061 cases in Marseille, France

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893920302179

 

http://archive.is/VEdFi

 

Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO)—mebendazole as an anti-cancer agent

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4096024/

 

Method of curing AIDS with tetrasilver tetroxide molecular crystal devices

 

https://patents.google.com/patent/US5676977A/en

 

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) activity.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15320751

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 92199b July 6, 2020, 7:31 a.m. No.2159   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Hydroxychloroquine Improves Obesity-Associated Insulin Resistance and Hepatic Steatosis by Regulating Lipid Metabolism

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689966/

 

what people are dying from is 5G sourced Radiation Pneumonitis

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071030/

 

Their results demonstrated that advanced age (OR 1.66, p < 0.0001) and pulmonary comorbidities (OR 2.27, p = 0.007) were significantly associated with the risk of developing RP. They also found that ongoing smoking protects against RP (p = 0.008) and a history of smoking shows borderline to significant protection (p = 0.006).

 

HCQ for MS (multiple sclerosis):

 

Minocycline and Hydroxychloroquine combined

 

Minocycline and hydroxychloroquine combined are candidate treatments for progressive MS.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28857721

 

'''Open-label, Single-center, Single-arm Futility Trial Evaluating Oral Hydroxychloroquine 200mg BID for Reducing Progression of Disability in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS)

 

Hydroxychloroquine in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis'''

 

https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02913157

 

Other:

 

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02913157

 

Effectiveness of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in Treating Selected Patients With Sarcoidosis With Neurological Involvement

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9740120/

 

Use of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of graft-versus-host disease

https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0650727A1/en

 

Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO)—chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as anti-cancer agents

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718030/

 

HCQ Studies

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq5WprDuARXrJl6N1aDjY/edit

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 92199b July 6, 2020, 7:31 a.m. No.2160   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Indomethacin Has a Potent Antiviral Activity Against SARS Coronavirus

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17302372/

https://archive.is/E3DQD

 

Breakthrough: Chloroquine Phosphate Has Shown Apparent Efficacy in Treatment of COVID-19 Associated Pneumonia in Clinical Studies

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32074550/

https://archive.is/YztZs

 

The ORF8 Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Mediates Immune Evasion through Potently Downregulating MHC-I

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.24.111823v1

https://archive.is/3S2ck

 

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) proteins of different bat species confer variable susceptibility to SARS-CoV entry

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00705-010-0729-6

https://archive.is/Hnv6W

 

Coronavirus Bioweapon – How China Stole Coronavirus From Canada And Weaponized It

https://greatgameindia.com/coronavirus-bioweapon/

https://archive.is/3UZzX

 

Spotlight: COVID-19 virus not created in lab, say French experts

http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-04/21/c_138995413.htm

https://archive.is/T8Pul

 

In silico comparison of spike protein-ACE2 binding affinities across species; significance for the possible origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus

https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.06199

https://archive.is/OHOEL

 

Wuhan lab admits to having three live strains of bat coronavirus on site

https://nypost.com/2020/05/24/wuhan-lab-admits-to-having-three-live-strains-of-bat-coronavirus/

https://archive.is/b0vhi

 

Australian researchers see virus design manipulation

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/may/21/australian-researchers-see-virus-design-manipulati/

https://archive.is/SgcTG

 

Report: Wuhan Lab Took Delivery Of World’s Deadliest Viruses’ Months Prior To Coronavirus Outbreak

https://summit.news/2020/06/15/report-wuhan-lab-took-delivery-of-worlds-deadliest-viruses-months-prior-to-coronavirus-outbreak/

https://archive.is/CXkQM

 

Norway Scientist Claims Report Proves Coronavirus Was Lab-Made

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidnikel/2020/06/07/norway-scientist-claims-report-proves-coronavirus-was-lab-made/#461d2347121d

https://archive.is/YeSYi

 

Coronavirus shock: Ex MI6 boss explains why Wuhan lab theory should not be dismissed

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1305554/china-news-wuhan-coronavirus-lab-theory-mi6-latest

https://archive.is/vXoBV

 

Italy: 96% of Coronavirus Fatalities Had Other Chronic Illnesses

https://www.breitbart.com/health/2020/05/27/italy-96-of-coronavirus-fatalities-had-other-chronic-illnesses/

https://archive.is/vwtrf

 

SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/05/19/science.abc4776

https://archive.is/X3ErV

 

Bat SARS-like coronavirus isolate bat-SL-CoVDXC86 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene, partial cds

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MG772844.1/

https://archive.is/jsMB4

 

The role of Vitamin D in the prevention of Coronavirus Disease 2019 infection and mortality

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-21211/v1

http://archive.is/UoIkm

Truth Seeker !!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 92199b July 6, 2020, 7:31 a.m. No.2161   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Hydroxychloroquine directly reduces the binding of antiphospholipid antibody–β2-glycoprotein I complexes to phospholipid bilayers

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518879/

https://archive.is/pbfRb

 

Hundreds of Medical Journals announce that COVID 19 symptoms should be treated as severe Thrombosis

https://evolvetoecology.org/2020/06/07/hundreds-of-medical-journals-announce-that-covid-19-symptoms-should-be-treated-as-severe-thrombosis/

https://archive.is/OWjuO

 

China’s Extended Lunar New Year Holiday Schedule

https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-extends-lunar-new-year-holiday-february-2-shanghai-february-9-contain-coronavirus-outbreak/

https://archive.is/AvP3g

 

Fauci: ‘No doubt’ Trump will face surprise infectious disease outbreak

https://www.healio.com/news/infectious-disease/20170111/fauci-no-doubt-trump-will-face-surprise-infectious-disease-outbreak

https://archive.is/a9PPU

 

Timeline of a Pandemic & The Cure Hydroxychloroquine.

https://qbrief.com/timeline-of-a-pandemic-and-hydroxychloroquine/

https://archive.is/SZtns

https://etched.page/7f78ebb5479e587ed8cce76c8910699be17993efdc0823029b4709aada692c0c/https://qbrief.com/timeline-of-a-pandemic-and-hydroxychloroquine/

 

Flu virus with 'pandemic potential' found in China

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-53218704?

https://archive.is/BknLO

https://etched.page/d7e92afebfc65ddd0313dca01460afa5c15e14dcf49b0ff00dba64e7cdf1ad13/https://www.bbc.com/news/health-53218704

 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/02/health/hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus-detroit-study/index.html

https://archive.is/1Ckmf

A surprising new study found that the controversial antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine helped patients better survive in the hospital

 

https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext

https://archive.is/UIkDh

 

Mutation

 

>By effect on function

>Gain-of-function mutations, also called activating mutations, change the gene product such that its effect gets stronger (enhanced activation) or even is superseded by a different and abnormal function. When the new allele is created, a heterozygote containing the newly created allele as well as the original will express the new allele; genetically this defines the mutations as dominant phenotypes. Several of Muller's morphs correspond to gain of function, including hypermorph (increased gene expression) and neomorph (novel function).

>In December 2017, the U.S. government lifted a temporary ban implemented in 2014 that banned federal funding for any new "gain-of-function" experiments that enhance pathogens "such as Avian influenza, SARS and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome or MERS viruses.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutation#By_effect_on_function

https://archive.is/DllKa

 

Provisional Deaths

 

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

https://archive.is/bo8l3

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/health_policy/Provisional-Death-Counts-COVID-19-Pneumonia-and-Influenza.pdf

 

Cases

 

https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19

 

Free data sources

 

https://guides.emich.edu/data/free-data

 

https://intelligence.house.gov/russiainvestigation/

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 92199b July 6, 2020, 7:33 a.m. No.2162   🗄️.is 🔗kun

✅Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/

 

✅Early Hydroxychloroquine Is Associated with an Increase of Survival in COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Study , https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202005.0057/v1

 

✅Early treatment of COVID-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: A retrospective analysis of 1061 cases in Marseille, France https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893920302179 , http://archive.is/VEdFi

 

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) activity. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15320751

 

Hydroxychloroquine Improves Obesity-Associated Insulin Resistance and Hepatic Steatosis by Regulating Lipid Metabolism https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689966/

 

✅Chloroquine Is a Zinc Ionophore https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182877/

 

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are associated with reduced cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001837/ , Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018; 12: 1685–1695, Published online 2018 Jun 11. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S166893

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/

 

Chloroquine Is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread

 

Here's the new study incoming:

 

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-begins-clinical-trial-hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin-treat-covid-19

 

NIH begins clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to treat COVID-19

 

To keep track of the study, look here:

 

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04358068

 

Evaluating the Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin to Prevent Hospitalization or Death in Persons With COVID-19

 

Collaborator: Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries LTD

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16115318

 

and

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15351731

 

Hydroxychloroquine can be prescribed to adults and children of all ages. It can also be safely taken by pregnant women and nursing mothers.

 

https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/resources/pdf/fsp/drugs/hydroxychloroquine.pdf

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 92199b July 6, 2020, 7:34 a.m. No.2163   🗄️.is 🔗kun

TIME LINE - WHY LIFT BAN ON "GAIN OF FUNCTION" DEC 2017

 

Why did they lift the ban on gain of function at Wuhan bio-level IV lab in 2017?

 

What was happening in 2017 besides Trump being sworn in as 45?

 

"2017" – Comey testifies/leaks Clinton Foundation under investigation.

 

"Oct 2017" - Las Vegas shooting

 

"Oct 2017" - NK nuclear test site collapses (tired mountain)

 

"Oct-Nov 2017" - Podesta Group closes suddenly

 

"Oct 28 2017” – Durham secret assignment (were there any leaks?)

 

"Nov 2017" - Sessions going after the leakers

 

"Nov 2017" - Saudis - Martial Law and arrests.

 

"Nov 2017” - Green killed by a suicide pilot in UK.

 

"Nov-Dec 2017" – Q makes a point to note Hussein running around the world

 

"Dec 2017" - Mueller investigation against Trump getting nowhere

 

Dec 1 2017 - FLYNN ENTERS A PLEA DEAL W/MUELLER ←- BINGO !?!

 

EXPANDED TIME LINE

 

“2013” - (Speculation: Did Fauci sponsored team at NIH already figure out the gain of function on CoV prior to 2014?)

 

"2013-2014" - Gain of function project is closed down as too dangerous by Obama admin.

 

(Speculation: provided Obama admin deniability; they are all gonna make trillions on vaccinating the whole world.)

 

"2014" - China gets permission to build a bio-level 4 lab (Wuhan)

 

"2014" - NIH/Fauci funds the research at Wuhan lab.

 

"2014" - Wuhan bio-level 4 lab completed (wikipedia)

 

"2014" - Bat lady Shi Zheng-Li collaborated on additional gain of function experiments led by Ralph S. Baric of Univ. of NC.

 

"2017" - Wuhan bio-level 4 lab warned a virus could get loose from their lab (how convenient!)

 

"Dec 5 2017” - Q Post 260

 

>Who knows where the bodies are buried?

 

>FLYNN is safe."

 

Dec 19 2017 - Fauci's NIH lifts the ban on research on gain of function

 

sauce: https://www.businessinsider.com/nih-lifts-ban-on-flu-mers-sars-virus-gain-of-function-research-2017-12?op=1

 

"Jan 2018" – State Dept warnings dispatched to DC about Wuhan IV's threat / safety / dangerous research being conducted.

 

Sauce: https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2020/04/14/wapo-state-department-warned-safety-issues-wuhan-coronavirus-lab-2018/

 

"Dec 12 2018" - Q Post 2595

 

>Think 'Elf on the Shelf'.

 

>Can you find the next one? “<-–”

 

Dec 10 2019 - Obama's cryptic tweet - Get health insurance by Dec 15 and Elf of the Shelf is another thing, one candle lit/green goblin

 

(green light)

 

sauce: https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/1204448901291487233

 

"Dec 14 2019 - Obama's 2nd tweet about getting health insurance” (confirmation?)

 

sauce: https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/1205880457545560066

 

“Jan 15, 2020” - first case in US

 

“Jan 15, 2020” - impeach Trump

 

“April 2020” - (wiki) Novo-virus Identified in Dec 2019 - media push 1st case back to Nov 2019.

 

sauce: https://www.livescience.com/first-case-coronavirus-found.html

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 92199b July 6, 2020, 7:35 a.m. No.2164   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Timeline of COVID-19:

 

This is an update for OP given the new information we know about cell phone/telemetry/internet & social media posting and searching. Source: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6884792-MACE-E-PAI-COVID-19-ANALYSIS-Redacted.html Note that this is the source referred to by NBC in their original reporting.

 

Between October 6-11, 2019

 

Hazardous event occurs at Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) BSL-4 Lab.

 

October 11, 2019

 

Area surrounding WIV BSL-4 Lab goes on lockdown.

 

October 19-27, 2019

 

World Military Games event is held in Wuhan. Many athletes have come forward in recent weeks saying they were sick at the games or immediately afterwards. Ex:

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8327047/More-competitors-reveal-ill-World-Military-Games.html

 

https://www.news18.com/news/sports/new-revelations-from-world-military-games-participants-hint-at-covid-19-spread-in-china-in-october-2625391.html

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/french-army-returned-wuhan-military-21988912

 

November 3-9, 2019

 

The 2019 International Workshop on Biosafety Laboratory Management and Techniques was supposed to be hosted by WIV, however the annual even was quietly cancelled and never took place.

 

November 17, 2019

 

Researchers discover the beginning of a spike in Internet and Social Media searches related to "SARS", "Feidian", "coronavirus", "shortness of breath", "dyspnea", and "diarrhea". This may indicate the virus was already widely spreading.

 

November 26-28, 2019

 

A series of "suspicious" visits to the WIV BSL-4 Lab are detected. It appears the visitor might have been "a member of the Emerging Infectious Desease team and Duke-NUS in Singapore".

 

December 1, 2019

 

A Chinese scientific paper in The Lancet reported the first known patient came down with flu-like symptoms.

 

December 31, 2020

 

China reports outbreak of Pneumonia cases:

 

https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/27-04-2020-who-timeline—covid-19

 

Jan 21, 2020

 

China applies for patent for Remdisvir:

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-05/china-is-trying-to-patent-gilead-s-experimental-coronavirus-drug

 

Jan 19th, 2020

 

First US Case Reported (Patient entered the country on Jan 15th, 2020):

 

https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa2001191

 

Jan 28th, 2020

 

Dr. Charles Lieber, 60, Chair of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University, was arrested for his involvement in the Thousand Talents program:

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related

 

Jan 31, 2020

 

Travel Ban from WH:

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-suspension-entry-immigrants-nonimmigrants-persons-pose-risk-transmitting-2019-novel-coronavirus/

 

Feb 8th, 2020

 

Pompeo warns governors that China is "watching" them/has a list:

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/08/mike-pompeo-governors-china-112539

 

Feb 13th, 2020

 

Korean Doctors figure out how to treat:

 

http://www.koreabiomed.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=7428

 

Feb 25th, 2020

 

Gilead funds a study to test their patented Remdesivir:

 

https://www.healio.com/infectious-disease/emerging-diseases/news/online/%7Bf5fb5e25-94c9-46fd-b30f-00f3cad4fd11%7D/us-begins-trial-of-remdesivir-to-treat-patients-with-covid-19

 

March 16th, 2020

 

Raoult posts a video about his successes in treating patients with HCQ and Zpack:

 

https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/coronavirus-diagnostiquons-et-traitons-premiers-resultats-pour-la-chloroquine/%20

 

March 17th, 2020

 

French news outlet reports Raoult's success in treatment:

 

https://www.connexionfrance.com/French-news/French-researcher-in-Marseille-posts-successful-Covid-19-coronavirus-drug-trial-results

 

March 20, 2020

 

Dr. Raoult publishes his paper showing promising results from HCQ/ZPack:

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32205204/

 

And are keeping a running total of "cured" patients:

 

https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/covid-19/

 

March 21, 2020

 

Albert Einstein Hospital in Brazil announces it is preparing a research protocol for the medicine HCQ and COVID-19:

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=pt&u=https://www.focus.jor.br/hospital-albert-einstein-vai-testar-a-hidroxicloroquina-contra-o-covid-19/&prev=search

 

April 28th, 2020

 

Italian paper reports HCQ/Zpack success:

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=it&u=https://www.iltempo.it/salute/2020/04/28/news/coronavirus-farmaci-efficaci-news-danni-cura-annalisa-chiusolo-artrite-terapia-idrossiclorochina-sars-cov2-1321227/&prev=search

 

April 29, 2020

 

Fauci touts Remdesivir as "new standard of care" in treating COVID-19:

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/29/dr-anthony-fauci-says-data-from-remdesivir-coronavirus-drug-trial-shows-quite-good-news.html

 

May 7th, 2020

 

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons states that Nine of the experts on the NIH COVID-19 Panel recommending treatment options have disclosed financial support from Gilead:

 

https://aapsonline.org/a-tale-of-two-drugs-money-vs-medical-wisdom/

 

May 10th, 2020

 

Brazil touting success with HCQ/Zpack:

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=pt&u=https://cartapiaui.com.br/noticias/feitosa-costa/avanco-hospital-no-piaui-cura-pessoas-da-covid-19-e-esvazia-utis-com-uso-de-cloroquina-36954.html&prev=search

 

States that are open vs Closed (NYT Interactive Map):

 

Remember what POMPEO talked about

 

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/states-reopen-map-coronavirus.html

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 92199b July 6, 2020, 8:02 a.m. No.2177   🗄️.is 🔗kun

PLANDEMIC Part 1 (Dr. Judy Mikovits)

 

English: https://www.bitchute.com/video/IB3ijQuLkkUr/

 

Portuguese: https://www.bitchute.com/video/nCvB4qZM3mc0/

 

Spanish: https://www.mediafire.com/file/eqceqi9veivlsiw/Pl4nd3m1c.rar/file

 

Polish: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Y89m9i4y7mg2/

Truth Seeker ID: 769770 July 7, 2020, 5:25 a.m. No.2243   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Anecdotal evidence proves very little on its own but confirms other accounts of test kits being tainted.

Someone needs to stand up and do this on record or else it remains just rumor or heresay.

 

>>>qresearch/9881613

https://twitter.com/RebeccaBarr214/status/1280284540490051584

So, my best friend, who works for a large pharmaceutical company just shared this with me.

 

One of her co-workers, is on vacation in Texas, and she and her sister were at the community pool. They started talking to a gentleman there who works in a testing lab.

 

He said that he's baffled by the strong uptick in positives, like someone is pushing for the "second wave".

So, he decided to purchase 200 test kits himself and submit them to a competing lab to see what happened.

He didn't actually "test" anyone, just made them appear tested.

4:36 PM · Jul 6, 2020·Twitter Web App

 

Sure enough, over 50% of the UNTESTED test kits turned up as POSITIVE.

What the hell is going on?

When will the madness stop.

When will #AmericaWakeUp ?

#Scamdemic

#SheepWearMasks

Truth Seeker ID: 378aef July 7, 2020, 12:29 p.m. No.2269   🗄️.is 🔗kun

topics for writeups

 

https://truepundit.com/heres-the-full-list-of-every-company-who-got-a-covid-19-loan-on-your-tax-dime-from-the-government/

 

https://truepundit.com/deadly-cover-up-fauci-approved-hydroxychloroquine-15-years-ago-to-cure-coronaviruses-nobody-needed-to-die/

 

https://archive.vn/ym7hj

>archive for one of his sources thats been shutdown

 

be careful with this guy, check his sources etc. he's been demoralization-shilling against Barr and Durham. I'm not sure what to think about him.

Truth Seeker ID: be6471 July 8, 2020, 7:26 a.m. No.2309   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2718

>>>/qresearch/9883972

 

>Medical anon here.

>I disagree with this Anon's presentation.

>yes, the chloroquine study in 2005 showed SARS-COV inhibition in vitro. This study was the basis of TREATMENT for SARS around that time and was the REASON that vaccine development was not pushed.

>Since this SARS-COV2, there HAS been research that has this study as foundational for the hypothesis of HCQ or chloroquine as tx for THIS virus.

>I have read EVERY study since JANUARY when this virus started. I've been following this outbreak since BEFORE POTUS closed the border to china flights.

>The key that everyone is missing are the studies the demonstrate the Zinc ionophore action and zinc's role as a whole on blocking the replication of BOTH of the SARS-COV viruses.

>Having adequate levels of zinc at baseline PREVENTS it.

>HCQ and chloroquine (though increased side effects and toxicity with chloroquine) are Zinc IONOPHORES which makes sense that it would thus PREVENT COVID, as well as treat it successfully EARLY in the disease.

>Vit D levels that are adequate ALSO help to prevent COVID infection.

>Querecetin is a Zinc ionophore also, and many people takes this as a prevention along with zinc and vit D.

>No one is talking about Sweet wormwood which has ALSO been shown to prevent and/or treat COVID in early stages.

>So, NO, the original Anon poster and gateway pundit's article is ACCURATE. This was medically INTENTIONAL to HIDE treatment (even before Trump backed it).

>Think about this: Fauci is NIAID of NIH. his specialty is AID/HIV, he is in DEEP with the pharm that makes AIDS drugs (as well as clinton foundation), OFCOURSE he has a financial incentive to push Remdesivir. They are STILL pushing remdesivir despite the clinical trials being CANCELLED due to adverse effects. The most that has been shown to be statistically significant is a decrease of illness duration from 15 days to 11 days.

>This would also benefit the hospitals. If reimbursement is lump sum for Dx (called DRG- all states have this except Maryland who sets its own price controls in the socialist medical system we ALREADY HAVE). So if hospitals get $39000 for COVID case, and you can shorten the length of stay, just like in a restaurant, you can turn over the beds quicker make more money with more admits. Also with DRGs (a lump sum payment to a hospital for a specific diagnosis) if a hospital treats/discharges a patient in a cost effective manner and makes a profit they keep the profit, if they have a loss, they eat it. Illness length shortened = increased profit potential.

 

>>>/qresearch/9882965

>The questions are disturbing to a spectacular degree. If Dr. Fauci has known since 2005 of the effectiveness of HCQ, why hasn’t it been administered immediately after people show symptoms, as Dr. Zelenko has done? Maybe then nobody would have died and nobody would have been incarcerated in place except the sick, which is who a quarantine is for in the first place. To paraphrase Jesus, it’s not the symptom-free who need HCQ but the sick. And they need it at the first sign of symptoms.

>> https://truepundit.com/deadly-cover-up-fauci-approved-hydroxychloroquine-15-years-ago-to-cure-coronaviruses-nobody-needed-to-die/

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd Healthy People Should Not Be Wearing Masks July 8, 2020, 8:04 p.m. No.2339   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2340

>>>/qresearch/9900853

>Just ran across a new article on mask wearing.

>Pretty new, published today July 8,2020

>Very long and in depth and shows that healthy people should not be wearing them.

 

>https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/physician-and-medical-journal-editor-healthy-people-should-not-wear-face-masks/

Truth Seeker ID: 3530f5 July 9, 2020, 7:44 a.m. No.2353   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The virus that subsequently escaped from the Wuhan Lab

 

Sauce on it's origins… Part one.

 

What is Gain-of-Function Research & Who is at High Risk?

 

https://ahrp.org/what-is-gain-of-function-research-who-is-at-high-risk/

 

Excerpt:

 

Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has headed the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, has played a major role in promoting and funding gain-of-function research, both in the US and China. Newsweek reported: “He argued that the research was worth the risk it entailed because it enables scientists to make preparations that could be useful if and when a pandemic occurred.”

 

Those claims are belied by the empirical evidence GoF experiments have neither prevented a pandemic, nor provided useful information about safe and effective pandemic countermeasures. Numerous prominent scientists argue that these experiments deviate from morally justifiable research, and the experimentally altered pathogens have put the entire human species at risk.

 

“Incidents causing potential exposures to pathogens occur frequently in the high security laboratories often known by their acronyms, BSL3 (Biosafety Level 3) and BSL4. Lab incidents that lead to undetected or unreported laboratory-acquired infections can lead to the release of a disease into the community outside the lab; lab workers with such infections will leave work carrying the pathogen with them. If the agent involved were a potential pandemic pathogen, such a community release could lead to a worldwide pandemic with many fatalities. Of greatest concern is a release of a lab-created, mammalian-airborne-transmissible, highly pathogenic avian influenza virus, such as the airborne-transmissible H5N1 viruses created in the laboratories of Ron Fouchier in the Netherlands and Yoshihiro Kawaoka In Madison Wisconsin.

 

Such releases are fairly likely over time, as there are at least 14 labs (mostly in Asia) now carrying out this research. Whatever release probability the world is gambling with, it is clearly far too high a risk to human lives. Mammal-transmissible bird flu research poses a real danger of a worldwide pandemic that could kill human beings on a vast scale.”

 

"Dr. Fauci, the head of the NIAID since 1984, has been in the forefront in supporting highest risk pathogen experiments. Dr. Fauci bears grave responsibility for having ignored a continuous series of documented reports — all of which warned of impending catastrophic pandemics, directly caused by experimental laboratory-created pathogens.

 

It should be evident to everyone, that as long as irresponsible government officials continue to fund and promote experiments whose aim is to increase the virulence and lethal capacity of biological pathogens and viruses, the risk that those lethal pathogens can, have, and will escape from laboratories, is certain.

 

Those accidental escapes pose catastrophic existential risk for the global human community.

 

If we want to preserve our existence on the planet, our government must stop funding this line of research."

 

A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2012-7

 

“Against this background Shi Zhengli published her landmark paper in the journal Nature in February this year, after the COVID-19 pandemic had spread across the globe. In this paper, Shi and her co-authors claimed to have identified the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 and its “probable” origin, a natural bat coronavirus, which she called RaTG13. The paper highlights the natural origin zoonotic theory for SARS-CoV-2 – that it jumped from an animal into humans at the Huanan seafood and wildlife market. This theory has not subsequently been supported by emerging evidence.

 

All publications arguing for a natural origin for SARS-CoV-2 rely heavily on this one paper by Shi Zhengli and colleagues, describing the sequence of a purported natural bat coronavirus named RaTG13. But notably absent from the paper is any reference at all to Shi and her collaborators’ long history of gain-of-function genetic engineering research with bat coronaviruses, described above. That includes the important paper by UNC and WIV scientists of 2015, which had the alarming result of turning a harmless bat virus into a human pathogen.”

 

The Feb 2020 Nature paper described in the article has a publication timeline as reported below.

 

. Zhou, P., Yang, X., Wang, X. et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579, 270–273 (2020).

 

Received20 January 2020

 

Accepted29 January 2020

 

Published03 February 2020

 

Issue Date12 March 2020

 

WOW. The skids were really greased to make this happen in a timely fashion, to highlight the concept that the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 and it jumped from an animal into humans at the Huanan seafood and wildlife market.

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 3530f5 July 9, 2020, 7:44 a.m. No.2354   🗄️.is 🔗kun

SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence

 

Published in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Strates of America) March 14, 2016

 

https://www.pnas.org/content/113/11/3048

 

SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) appears to be a man made chimeric virus

 

Here is the blueprint for Modifying (man made) SARS-Cov based Virus

 

From the first paragraph of this article:

 

“This manuscript describes efforts to extend surveillance beyond sequence analysis, constructing chimeric and full-length zoonotic coronaviruses to evaluate emergence potential. Focusing on SARS-like virus sequences isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats, the results indicate a significant threat posed by WIV1-CoV. Both full-length and chimeric WIV1-CoV readily replicated efficiently in human airway cultures and in vivo, suggesting capability of direct transmission to humans.”

 

And from the results summary in this article:

 

Using the SARS-CoV infectious clone as a template (7), we designed and synthesized a full-length infectious clone of WIV1-CoV consisting of six plasmids that could be enzymatically cut, ligated together, and electroporated into cells to rescue replication competent progeny virions (Fig. S1A). In addition to the full-length clone, we also produced WIV1-CoV chimeric virus that replaced the SARS spike with the WIV1 spike within the mouse-adapted backbone (WIV1-MA15, Fig. S1B). WIV1-MA15 incorporates the original binding and entry capabilities of WIV1-CoV, but maintains the backbone changes to mouse-adapted SARS-CoV. Importantly, WIV1-MA15 does not incorporate the Y436H mutation in spike that is required for SARS-MA15 pathogenesis (8). Following electroporation into Vero cells, robust stock titers were recovered from both chimeric WIV1-MA15 and WIV1-CoV.

 

And the connection to Wuhan Labs in China is highlighted in the Acknowledgments:

 

We thank Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein. Research was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and the National Institute of Aging of the NIH under Awards U19AI109761 and U19AI107810 (to R.S.B.), AI1085524 (to W.A.M.), and F32AI102561 and K99AG049092 (to V.D.M.). Human airway epithelial cell cultures were supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease under Award NIH DK065988 (to S.H.R.). Support for the generation of the mice expressing human ACE2 was provided by NIH Grants AI076159 and AI079521 (to A.C.S.).

 

And an interesting side note: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) is managed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, in case you were wondering if he had any connection to this.

 

My assessment is that the PNAS article indicates strongly that NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, managed br Dr. Anthony Fauci, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, managed by Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi cooperated to create what ultimately became the chimeric virus SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) pandemic.

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 3530f5 July 9, 2020, 7:45 a.m. No.2355   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Chinese and US scientists genetically engineered bat coronaviruses in dangerous gain-of-function research stretching back years

 

https://gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/19410-chinese-and-us-scientists-genetically-engineered-bat-coronaviruses-in-dangerous-gain-of-function-research-stretching-back-years

 

Excerpt from this article:

 

Research was omitted from landmark paper claiming natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. Report: Claire Robinson

 

Chinese and US scientists have been collaborating for years in dangerous gain-of-function experiments that involve genetically engineering coronaviruses from bats and other animals, as revealed by a series of scientific publications. The coronaviruses are related to the SARS viruses that cause severe respiratory diseases in humans. The scientists were based at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China, the lab suspected by some of accidentally releasing the SARS-CoV-2 virus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic, and at the University of North Carolina (UNC) in the US.

 

Oddly, however, this long and high-profile research history was entirely omitted from the scientific paper, published in Nature in February this year, in which Shi Zhengli and her team at the WIV claimed to have identified a natural origin for SARS-CoV-2. The origin, according to the WIV scientists, was a bat virus, RaTG13, that was thought to have jumped from an animal to a human at a Wuhan seafood and wildlife market (the “zoonotic” theory – that is, coming from animals by a natural spillover event).

 

Why the omission? To understand the possible reason, we need to first understand the nature of the research work that was done by the WIV scientists and their US collaborators.

 

The purported benign aim of this line of research was to investigate the potential of bat coronaviruses to infect humans, to improve scientists’ ability to predict pandemics, and to develop vaccines or other therapies.

 

However, this is also gain-of-function research, which aims to make viruses more infective or transmissible. Such research has come under increasing criticism by scientists for many years, due to its tendency to pose huge risks for little benefit.

 

This fear is borne out by the results of a particularly risky gain-of-function experiment carried out in the US and published in 2015 by scientists from the UNC in collaboration with WIV scientists, including Shi Zhengli, dubbed China’s “bat woman” for her work with bat coronaviruses. The work was funded by: * The National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Disease (NIAID) of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). The director of the NIAID is Dr Anthony Fauci, who currently heads up the US COVID-19 response. The NIH’s money was directed through the US-based Eco-Health Alliance, headed by Dr Peter Daszak;

 

  • USAID; and

 

  • Chinese institutions.

 

In the published paper reporting the risky experiment, the scientists state that they began their work before the 2014 US temporary moratorium on virus gain-of-function studies, which was prompted by several high-profile biosafety failures at US labs. But in spite of the moratorium, as stated in the paper, the NIH gave permission for the study to continue. Dr Fauci of the NIAID “outsourced” the research to the WIV in China, in the words of one media article.

 

Alarming finding

 

In the experiment, the scientists took a mouse coronavirus and exchanged its spike protein – the part on the surface of the virus that determines infectivity – for one from a bat coronavirus that was similar to the virus that causes the human epidemic disease SARS. They kept the mouse virus “backbone” – its basic RNA and protein molecular structure. The bat coronavirus, in its natural state, was unable to infect humans as its spike protein was inadequate – it was not able to dock onto the ACE2 receptor on human cells.

 

Infectivity is supposed to be determined just by the spike protein. So joining the bat spike protein with the mouse virus backbone should have resulted in a virus that was non-infectious to humans

 

. But the resulting genetically engineered chimeric virus unexpectedly turned out to be highly infectious to humans. In fact, its infectivity, tested in human airway cells, was comparable to the human epidemic-causing virus strain SARS-CoV Urbani.

Truth Seeker ID: dc1888 July 9, 2020, 1:05 p.m. No.2393   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/07/07/my-investigation-of-covid-19/

excerpt -

As I laid out in several key articles, proper procedures of viral discovery were never carried out in China or anywhere else. There is no convincing proof researchers ever found a new virus.

Therefore, every piece of so-called information coming from “new virus” has no foundation whatsoever. For example, the diagnostic tests. Tests for what? And then, the case numbers would be meaningless as well.

But again, these facts are hard for people to swallow. They want to believe. They believe they must believe. It’s a theocracy.

 

In the set-up, there are two positions you can take. You can stand outside the whole illusion and expose it; or you can enter the illusion and then show internal contradictions and lies and false pictures, within the fraud.

For instance, the case numbers. I’ve explained ways the CDC and other agencies are fiddling them, inflating them. I’ve also stood outside the whole case number game and pointed out it’s without meaning, because, again, the existence of a new virus hasn’t been proven. The tests, all of them, are supposed to be evidence of the presence of the virus.

 

You can be OUTSIDE or INSIDE. Or both.

 

Speaking of teachings—one of the most important predispositions that people cling to like life rafts is: one effect, one cause. The effect would be COVID-19, and the cause would be the coronavirus. But the effect is not One Thing. As I stated above, people are actually dying as a result of different conditions…which have different causes. Grasping this produces a very beneficial explosion that scatters much mind control.

Another predisposition is the illogical notion that the effect proves the cause. “Well, look at the all the lockdowns (effect); therefore, the cause, the justification must be the dangerous virus.” Nonsense. Aristotle exposed that fallacy a long time ago.

An investigation of a story makes the story fall apart. You see it in a different light. You no longer believe the central narrative. You keep asking deeper questions about basic assertions contained in the story, and your answers produce more collapses of the cement that holds the story together.

 

Finally, for now, there is the matter of individual choice and responsibility. Individuals can believe or not believe. There is always that option. People are not doomed to accept an oppressive narrative imposed on them. If that were the case, there would be no point to human thought or action. We would forever be victims. This is not the case. It never was. Some people are dedicated to the notion that there is no way out of the dungeon of external control. Their dedication to this proposition has great tonnage. For them.

They purposely ignore the fact that, down through history, there has been an enormous struggle to establish individual freedom, and this war has been astonishingly successful—relative to older despotisms and tyrannies. In fact, their choice, now, to walk around spraying doom of whatever brand they want to sell is evidence of that freedom. I’m not impressed by doom. I’m impressed by freedom. We are in yet another fight for it now. I’m impressed by individuals who use their freedom to make their best vision into fact in the world. My investigations are aimed at exposing the power players who plot and fight against freedom.

Truth Seeker ID: dc1888 July 9, 2020, 1:10 p.m. No.2394   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/07/09/my-investigation-of-the-so-called-covid-deaths/

excerpt -

Take that picture and it will generally describe what is happening all over the world. COVID is old people. In Canada, for example, 81 percent of all so-called COVID deaths occur in nursing homes.

One other factor in New York. The current hospital treatment—breathing ventilators and sedation—kills 97.2 percent of those patients over the age of 66 who are subjected to it.

 

What about this re-labeling I mentioned? How is it done? Several ways. In hospitals, doctors simply write “COVID-19” on patient files. After patients die, their charts can be tagged “COVID.”

In general, there are three types of diagnosis. No test at all—just the observation of general flu-like symptoms. Or a PCR test, or an antibody test. Both tests spit out “COVID” results in a significant percentage of cases. The result has nothing to do with the detection of a unique “COVID virus.” The result is a function of the tests.

 

Do not assume that ONE CAUSE is the explanation for all so-called COVID deaths. This is a common deep error. “Well, if it isn’t the virus, then what is it?” There is no “it.” There is only a psychological disposition to search for an “it.” Look for MULTIPLE CAUSES.

Truth Seeker ID: dc1888 July 9, 2020, 1:18 p.m. No.2395   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/05/cdc-and-states-are-misreporting-covid-19-test-data-pennsylvania-georgia-texas/611935/

excerpt -

The agency confirmed to The Atlantic on Wednesday that it is mixing the results of viral and antibody tests, even though the two tests reveal different information and are used for different reasons.

 

“You’ve got to be kidding me,” Ashish Jha, the K. T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard and the director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, told us when we described what the CDC was doing. “How could the CDC make that mistake? This is a mess.”

 

Mixing the two tests makes it much harder to understand the meaning of positive tests, and it clouds important information about the U.S. response to the pandemic, Jha said. “The viral testing is to understand how many people are getting infected, while antibody testing is like looking in the rearview mirror. The two tests are totally different signals,” he told us. By combining the two types of results, the CDC has made them both “uninterpretable,” he said.

 

Kristen Nordlund, a spokesperson for the CDC, told us that the inclusion of antibody data in Florida is one reason the CDC has reported hundreds of thousands more tests in Florida than the state government has. The agency hopes to separate the viral and antibody test results in the next few weeks, she said in an email.

 

The CDC stopped publishing anything resembling a complete database of daily test results on February 29. When it resumed publishing test data last week, a page of its website explaining its new COVID Data Tracker said that only viral tests were included in its figures. “These data represent only viral tests. Antibody tests are not currently captured in these data,” the page said as recently as May 18.

 

Yesterday, that language was changed. All reference to disaggregating the two different types of tests disappeared. “These data are compiled from a number of sources,” the new version read. The text strongly implied that both types of tests were included in the count, but did not explicitly say so.

Truth Seeker ID: 0fc600 July 9, 2020, 3:14 p.m. No.2400   🗄️.is 🔗kun

From Coincidences to Coincidences, Covid and the “Boston Connexion” Serves Gilead’s Remdesivir?

by France Soir, translated from the French by France Soir

 

Each day brings new developments in what is now commonly known as the “LancetGate”. The WHO’s latest flip-flop, relayed by the many media who quickly relayed the fray against HCQ in the study published on May 22, is a perfect illustration of this. As is the one announcing tonight that The Lancet is withdrawing the Mehra et al. study after much criticism.

France Soir, far from following the media wolf pack, puzzled by these disturbing results, had already obtained and published on May 23 an exclusive interview with Dr. Mehra, the main author of this study.

The often evasive answers produced by Dr Mandeep R. Mehra, a physician specializing in cardiovascular surgery and professor at Harvard Medical School, did not produce confidence, fueling doubt instead about the integrity of this retrospective study and its results.

We have already published the results of our initial investigations in several articles. However, the reported information that Dr. Mehra had attended a conference sponsored by Gilead – producer of remdesivir, a drug in direct competition with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) – early in April called for further investigation.

It is important to keep in mind that Dr. Mandeep Mehra has a practice at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) in Boston.

The study published on May 22 in The Lancet, based on the collection, processing and analysis of massive data from the shared medical records of 96,032 patients in 671 hospitals worldwide by Surgisphere, was preceded by another study published on May 1st, 2009 in the New England Journal of Medicine, where Dr. Mehra was also the main author.

That study relied on the shared medical records of 8,910 patients in 169 hospitals around the world, also by Surgisphere.

Funding for the study was “Supported by the William Harvey Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. The development and maintenance of the collaborative surgical outcomes database was funded by Surgisphere.”

The study published on March 1st sought to “… assess the relationship between cardiovascular disease and drug therapy with in-hospital death in patients hospitalized with Covid-19 who were admitted between December 20, 2019 and March 15…”.

The study published on May 22 sought to evaluate the efficacy or otherwise of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, alone or in combination with a macrolide antibiotic.

It is therefore noteworthy that within 3 weeks, 2 large observational retrospective studies on large populations – 96,032 and 8,910 patients – spread around the world were published in two different journals by Dr. Mehra, Dr. Desai and other co-authors using the database of Surgisphere, Dr. Desai’s company.

These two practising physicians and surgeons seem to have an exceptional working capacity associated with the gift of ubiquity.

The date of May 22 is also noteworthy because on the very same day, the date of the publication in The Lancet of the highly accusatory study against HCQ, another study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine concerning the results of a clinical trial of…remdesivir.

In the conclusion of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, “remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults hospitalized with Covid-19 and evidence of lower respiratory tract infection.”

Concretely: on the same day, May 22nd, one study demeaned HCQ in one journal while another claimed evidence of attenuation on some patients through remdesivir in another journal.

The Lancet Published a Fraudulent Covid-19 Study: Editor Calls It “Department of Error”

 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/boston-connexion-serves-remdesivir/5717771

 

from >>>/qresearch/9909328

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd Remdesivir toxicity July 9, 2020, 7:35 p.m. No.2415   🗄️.is 🔗kun

from >>>/qresearch/9911453

 

Remdesivir toxicity: 4 of the first 5 patients treated with it in France, had to stop due to serious side effects, 2 reaching KIDNEY FAILURE, REQUIRING KIDNEY REPLACEMENT!

 

[Note: the study was done at the Bichat hospital in Paris, where works Yazdan Yazdanpanah works. Yazdan Yazdanpanah was one of the foremost proponents of remdesivir prioritization in WHO studies conducted in France. He also is one of the co-authors of this case reports study.

 

This is an important remark, because it cannot be said that this study was done by anti-remdesivir doctors. It was carried out by remdesivir advocates.]

 

Case reports study of the first five patients COVID-19 treated with remdesivir in France

 

Highlights

 

• Remdesivir has been found to be an in-vitro potent inhibitor of RNA viruses including SARS-CoV-2 but its in-vivo potency is still under active investigations.

 

• In this work, we depict the clinical features of 5 hospitalized COVID-19 patients under remdisivir compassionate use.

 

• Remdisivir infusion was associated with decreasing viral loads from nasopharyngeal samples despite active replication in the lower respiratory tract area evidenced for two patients.

 

• The treatment had to be interrupted for potential side effects for 4 out 5 patients including two alamine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation and two renal failure cases.

 

Abstract

 

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been identified as responsible for the COVID-19 outbreak worldwide. Data on treatment are scare and parallels are made between SARS-CoV-2 and other coronavirus. Remdesivir is a broad spectrum antiviral with efficient in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2 and controversial evidence of clinical improvement in severe COVID-19 patients. We aimed to describe the clinical outcome and virological monitoring of the first five COVID-19 patients admitted in ICU for severe pneumonia related to SARS-CoV-2 and treated with remdesivir in the University hospital of Bichat, Paris, France.

 

SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR in blood plasma, lower and upper respiratory tract were monitored. Among the five treated patients, two needed mechanical ventilation and one high flow cannula oxygen. A significant decrease in SARS-CoV-2 viral load from upper respiratory tract was observed in most cases but two died with active SARS-CoV-2 replication in the lower respiratory tract. Plasma samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 in only one patient. Remdesivir was interrupted for side effects among four patients, including 2 ALT elevations (3 to 5 N) and 2 renal failures requiring renal replacement.

 

This case series of five COVID-19 patients requiring ICU for a respiratory distress and treated with remdesivir, highlights the complexity of remdesivir use in such critically ill patients.

 

source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220305282

 

paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220305282/pdfft?md5=0b779d888b1cc232dee29ab8f9f713ac&pid=1-s2.0-S1201971220305282-main.pdf

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd Lawfag: Contesting Illegal Mask Orders & Business Closures July 10, 2020, 8:11 a.m. No.2431   🗄️.is 🔗kun

3 parts from >>>/qresearch/9914684

>>>/qresearch/9914690

>>>/qresearch/9914691

 

Primer discussion on suing the government over mandatory masks and/or business closures (BC)

 

  1. What kind of “law” is the government using to require masks and/or BC’s?

 

You first need to know the source of the law, either executive or legislative. A mask and/or BC “law” may be a municipal or county ordinance enacted by your elected officials, or it may be a state law passed by your state legislature. It could also be an “order” or “proclamation” of your local or county executive (a manager, mayor, commissioner, etc.), or an “executive order” by your governor. Sometimes such orders at the state level may even involve the consent of a commission.

 

So, your starting point is to find out where the damn requirement came from. Get a copy. Print it.

 

  1. Does local/county/state law permit this?

 

This will get a little complicated, but bear with me. Start by understanding that there is the Federal government with authority from the Constitution, State gov’ts with their own Constitutions, and county/local governments which are referred to together as “Political Subdivisions” (Pol Subdivs). There are three kinds of ways State and Political Subdivisions may function – a State may elect to follow “Dillon’s Rule” (more common), “Home Rule” (less common) or a bastardization of the two. The difference is this: under Dillon’s Rule, Pol Subdivs can only exercise the authority that is delegated to them by the State, and under Home Rule the Pol Subdivs have inherent powers to do what they want. You can find a good discussion of it, along with what your state may be, here:

 

https://constitutingamerica.org/home-rule-or-dillon-rule-meaning-and-purpose-for-effective-local-government-guest-essayist-marc-clauson/

 

Why does that matter? Two reasons – Pol Subdivs are more likely to be active in passing ridiculous laws in a Home Rule state, and courts in Home Rule states are even more likely to grant deference to the Pol Subdivs. That will be ON TOP of their inherent liberal bias if the judge is a leftist crony.

 

So, with that in mind, you will need to then look at the State Constitution or Pol Subdiv Charter (or whatever your state calls it). ALSO keep in mind that what you see when you search online for that may have been amended, and those amendments can be “hiding” in other links you have to search down, instead of the document you are looking at. The large majority of Pol Subdiv ordinances can be found are here:

 

https://library.municode.com

 

https://codelibrary.amlegal.com

 

Keep in mind – large majority. Not all; your town or county may use another vendor or self-publish its code.

 

If the law comes from a Pol Subdiv, you also need to look at your State Constitution and State code so you can learn the legal background of your State’s laws. In doing so, you are trying to find language that either does not grant power to the Pol Subdiv, or creates a legal boundary that a Mask or BC law crosses…

 

If you find such State law, bookmark it. That can be one line of attack.

 

  1. Sidebar about legal analysis

 

Do not use “chop logic”, which is what almost EVERY non-lawyer uses, when analyzing something. For instance, I recently had someone here tell me that the CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) mandated businesses to provide everyone who enters their store a respirator mask, regardless of the business. UTTER HORSESHIT. The CFR section in question (OSHA regulations) only applied to employees, and further only applied to certain kinds of businesses which performed work where respiratory issues were a risk associated with that work.

 

Make sure the law you’re looking at applies to the situation. If you yank something from the Worker’s Comp laws and expect it to apply to masks, well…you’re free to wreck your shit driving the wrong way down that one-way street. Don’t bother arguing with me, either, because if you’re stupid enough to hang your hat on bullshit analysis and reject educated rebuttal, I feel no compunction to help you.

 

  1. After laying the groundwork of how to look at this, the analysis of all 3 possible government actors (State, or the two Pol Subdivs) becomes relatively common.

 

A. Did the State law authorize it (expressly, or through inherent Home Rule powers?)

 

This may well involve looking at case law, good luck with that. Again, NO CHOP LOGIC. Focus your search on government power to pass orders, don’t look at a case involving a contract or a car wreck, or some other unrelated bullshit, and expect it to provide you with precedent. Also, don’t go to old platitudes in the US Constitution from 1842 and expect them to carry any weight. Look at the nitty gritty of the question involving orders or ordinances passed by local governments (parallels are exec orders and statutes at the State level).

 

If not authorized, great! You have a legal basis to challenge it.

 

B. If the Mask or BC law is authorized, does the language of the Mask and/or BC law exceed what is legally permitted?

 

If it does, great! You have a legal basis to challenge it.

 

C. If the Mask or BC law could be authorized, but the government didn’t follow the proper procedures to enact it, is that a claim?

 

Sorta congrats – you have a basis to challenge it (“due process”), but the government can cure the problem and kill your lawsuit.

 

  1. If it is legally permitted, is it still discriminatory in some way?

 

Discrimination occurs when a law harms a definable, recognizable group of people (race, sex, religion, ethnicity, age). “I’m a Republican” is not a recognizable group of people. You wouldn’t know from looking at the person. So discrimination is typically a limited.

 

However, the “class” analysis is also applied in a different way, when a law affects other subsets of people and organizations differently. For instance, a law that should have general application may only apply to, say, pubs instead of hardware stores. This is not discrimination as you hear it on TV, it is instead a possible “equal protection” claim. That can arise under either your State Constitution or the US Constitution. Equal Protection claims are tricky. It is a long discussion and the best way to begin to learn about it is by starting here:

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/equal_protection

 

Keep in mind also that EP claims may involve “as written” and “as applied” situations.

 

  1. The basic thing to keep in mind about Equal Protection

 

Here is the thing - “Does this make any sense?” is a pretty good layman's rule of thumb to use when analyzing an “as written” EP claim. For instance, if a government passes a law or order that says liquor stores may stay open but churches cannot, your gut reaction is, “This is STUPID!” True, but you have to explain why, using facts. Does the law/order take into account that churches provide a necessary service? What is that service, and how would you describe it? (Here is where you can pull some descriptive language from other kinds of cases that can carry weight, ESPECIALLY if it’s US Supreme Court language). Does the liquor store provide a necessary service? Again, how? What are the differences in how they operate? What are the similarities? Are both capable of taking precautions under existing medical guidelines to safely operate? Did the government take this into account? Did it ask the public before doing something stupid?…

 

That’s the basics of building that kind of case.

 

  1. “As written” vs “as applied”

 

If a law violates EP as written, then it should be fairly obvious. Good example – no singing in church. How in the FUCK could this possibly have anything to do with Rona protection? Do masks and “social distancing” work, or don’t they? Is it fair to let a restaurant operate with its employees in an enclosed kitchen, handling food to be given to the public while talking constantly to each other in order to do their jobs, and a church can’t meet for an hour and people sing a few times during the service? That’s an “as written” claim.

 

An “as applied” claim example would be a law that forbids public gatherings…unless the government refuses to enforce it as to BLM protesters.

 

  1. Great, Lawfag! I think I might have a claim…so what’s next?

 

You need to keep in mind 2 things – first, you need a good lawyer. Someone who will be on your side. That will take digging to find out which ones are conservatives handling civil rights cases…but a great place to start is to check with groups like the ACLJ. Don’t call them, do a search to find out if the ACLJ has done any work in your state. Also look for other groups and law firms like ACLJ in your state, or affiliated with ACLJ.

 

Second, you need to take their advice if they handle your case and don't try to out-lawyer your lawyer, because he'll end up firing your ass as a client, and rightfully so, but DO have a discussion as to whether you should file claims in State Court or Federal Court.

 

If you have a state law claim, your only recourse is in state court…so you are stuck with your state’s “forum selection” laws. That can be fatal to your cause if you have corrupt lib judges. Forum shopping is 100% something you should do, because the motherfuckers on the other side don’t hesitate to fuck you over by doing it themselves. However, if you have a Fed claim, Fed court can be the way to go. While you can bring both Fed and state claims together in Fed court, keep in mind that the Feds love to punt those back to State court under “concurrent jurisdiction” laws and allow the States to decide that.

 

Where you file matters.

 

A few things are over-simplified; it's hard to put this into laymen's terms in just a short period of time. Hope this helps.

 

I welcome other lawfags chiming in to flesh this out.

Truth Seeker ID: c34b58 July 11, 2020, 12:45 p.m. No.2514   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Repost from anon who created thread.

THREAD REMOVED CONTENT MOVED:

 

Anyone remember when Dr. Scott Jensen, a Minnesota physician and Republican state senator shared with the public, that he received a 7-page document coaching him to fill out death certificates with a COVID-19 diagnosis without a lab test to confirm the patient actually had the virus??

 

Here's the original article:

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/huge-mn-senator-dr-reveals-hhs-document-coaching-overcount-covid-19-cases-copy-document-video/

 

Now he is being targeted and investigated for speaking the truth, with threats to have his license revoked, because someone 'anonymously' filed a complaint about him to the MN Board of Medical Practice.

 

He just put out the following video detailing the complaint along with his response. He is devastated.

 

https://videos.utahgunexchange.com/watch/whistleblower-senator-scott-jensen-is-threatened-to-have-his-medical-license-taken_m8A9xL63MQ7iwSh.html

 

This is going too far!!!!

 

Please share.

Truth Seeker ID: eea9de OCLA Asks WHO to Retract Recommendation Advising Use of Face Masks in General Population July 11, 2020, 2:09 p.m. No.2517   🗄️.is 🔗kun

OCLA Asks WHO to Retract Recommendation Advising Use of Face Masks in General Population

Posted on June 21, 2020 by admin

 

http://ocla.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2020-06-21-Letter-OCLA-to-WHO-DG.pdf

 

OCLA has sent a letter (en français ici) to the Director General of the World Health Organization, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, asking him to retract the WHO’s recommendation advising the use of face masks in the general population to prevent COVID-19 transmission.

 

The letter criticizes the lack of a valid scientific basis for the WHO’s recommendation and expresses OCLA’s concerns about serious harms to individuals and societies stemming from the recommendation and from government impositions of face masks on the general public.

 

The letter includes statements such as:

 

“… the WHO cannot collect and rely on potentially biased studies to make recommendations that can have devastating effects (see below) on the lives of literally billions. Rather, the WHO must apply a stringent standards threshold, and accept only randomized controlled trials with verified outcomes. In this application, the mere fact that several such quality studies have not ever confirmed the positive effects reported in bias-susceptible reports should be a red flag.”

 

and

 

“It is an unjustified authoritarian imposition, and a fundamental indignity, to have the State impose its evaluation of risk on the individual, one which has no basis in science, and which is smaller than a multitude of risks that are both common and often created or condoned by the State.”

 

A copy of the letter is posted here and embedded below.

 

Une traduction en français de la lettre est disponible ici.

 

Related: Dr. John H. Murphy’s Letter to the Editor of 2 June 2020, submitted to the WHO Bulletin (the WHO refused to publish Dr. Murphy’s letter)

 

http://ocla.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/JHMurphy-Letter-to-the-Editor-Bull-WHO-June-2-2020.pdf

Truth Seeker ID: eea9de July 11, 2020, 2:26 p.m. No.2518   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2089

 

Misinterpretation virus

from Dr. Stefan Lanka

SCIENCE PLUS magazine 02/2020

 

  1. Beginning of the corona crisis

  2. One of two possible causes of Li Wenliang's fear

  3. The second of the possible causes of Li Wenliang's fear

  4. The globalization of the Chinese SARS virus panic and course setting for the corona crisis by Prof. Drosten

  5. The crucial questions for a quick end to the corona crisis

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qJrr-yZPto20l-9aFVAP9F9bpeaH48R4/view

 

[attached]

Truth Seeker ID: a68825 Rethinking COVID-19 Mortality Statistics July 11, 2020, 5:31 p.m. No.2527   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2089

>>2089

https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/05/27/rethinking-covid-19-mortality-statistics-14811

 

By Chuck Dinerstein, MD, MBA and Charles Geshekter, Ph.D. — May 27, 2020

Throughout the coronavirus crisis, the co-authors of this article have often held opposite viewpoints on many aspects of the issue. Despite coming from different disciplines with competing perspectives, they join forces to address puzzling questions about coronavirus mortality statistics.

 

Image courtesy of RitaE on Pixabay

“Statistics may be used to convert complicated social problems into more easily understood estimates, percentages and rates.” Joel Best [1]

 

Introduction

 

The science of collecting and analyzing numerical data is fundamental to understanding social phenomena. In the Coronavirus Era, researchers, physicians, administrators, and funding agencies aim to seek a consensus about the origins, pathogenic effects, effective treatments, and containment measures regarding a novel coronavirus – all of which require data predicated on morbidity and mortality statistics. Careful attention to the data is critical for understanding mortality figures while remaining mindful of the flaws and limitations attendant with any statistics. 

 

Epidemics have complex causes from interacting with environmental factors. In our data-saturated world, now more than ever, we need to maintain a realistic sense of risks to our safety and health. Over the past six months, the CDC statistics and Johns Hopkins University tables have been used to convert complex health issues surrounding COVID-19 into better-understood numbers about death estimates and cases. Understanding may become distorted when numbers replace clear definitions. Numbers are not facts and should not be considered indisputable. The conscious choice of what figures to count or weigh does and should not convey precision or infallibility.

 

Descriptive statistics based on clear definitions must be accurate enough to arouse and mitigate concerns in a new epidemic. Statistical analysis warrants skepticism, diverse perspectives, and common sense. Vigorous debates over the accuracy or meaning of COVID-19 numbers should ultimately help to better explain medical and scientific truths.

 

COVID-19 Statistics

 

There are two fundamental points often ignored when referring to “the death toll from COVID-19.”

 

There is no evidence or proof offered by any scientist, pathologist, or virologist that confirms COVID-19 as the “cause” of death in the certification process.

An expanded definition of a “COVID-19 death” was enacted by the CDC on March 24th, to include probable cases. This conflates and clusters test results creating a source of both under and overestimation. “COVID-19 deaths are identified using a new ICD-10 code. When COVID-19 is reported as a cause of death or when it is listed as a ‘probable’ or ‘presumed’ cause, it is coded as UO7.1 This can include cases with or without laboratory confirmation.” [emphasis added]

All deaths of patients with a linkage to COVID-19 are now classified as “COVID-19 deaths regardless of cause or underlying health issues that could have contributed to loss of life.” - Dr. Deborah Birx

 

Today, deaths from coronary disease, diabetes, morbid obesity, or pneumonia may be linked or connected to a COVID-19 positive test result. The operative words “linked” or “connected” provide little explanation of how they’re related or indicate what the presumed link entails. As the Wall Street Journal noted, “tabulating deaths is tricky. Some states count probable deaths for cases where there weren’t test results available, but where the deceased had symptoms of the disease.”

 

Annual reports from the CDC/NIH confirm that Americans continue to die from the same top ten common causes. The leading causes of death are coronaries, cancers, accidents, lower respiratory diseases, stroke, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s. The mortality numbers remain consistently around 2.8 million per annum.

 

Our essay suggests a snapshot in time for Coronavirus deaths. For this investigation, we accept the CDC’s data from January 1st to May 5th as the standard, providing a date at which to engage the statistics, without future projections or shifting definitions.

 

Annual Mortality Statistics

 

Tracking mortality statistics for COVID-19 involves a moving target of guesses, projections, and revised definitions. Amidst an avalanche of expanding statistics, we need to put American deaths into perspective. On average, 7,700 deaths occur every day from all causes in the U.S. That amounts to 2.8 million deaths per annum. With no available data for 2019, the National Vital Statistics Survey (NVSS) estimates there were 25,000 more deaths in 2018 than in 2017, a statistically insignificant amount. The death rate in America stands consistently at 0.8% annually.

 

To make broad estimates, the CDC uses statistical models which it periodically revises. From 2013-2018, the CDC claims influenza annually caused 57,000 deaths [2] and sickened 42 million Americans. Fatal complications from the flu may include pneumonia, stroke, and heart attack. While the impact of the flu varies, the CDC estimates that influenza results in between 9 million and 49 million cases of illness and between 12,00 to 79,000 annual deaths per year. This enormous range is not unusual with CDC statistics, because not all flu cases are ever reported, and flu is not always listed on death certificates.

 

In its annual mortality tabulations, the CDC combines influenza and pneumonia into a single category. This category typically averages between 51,000 and 56,000 fatalities, making it the 8th leading cause of death per year from 2013-2017. An estimated 80,000 Americans died of influenza and its complications in the winter of 2018, the highest death toll in 40 years. But counting influenza cases is problematic.

 

The CDC was “not sure of the exact numbers because flu is not a reportable disease in most parts of the United States.” ( www.hopkinsmedicine.org.) Furthermore, influenza/pneumonia record-keeping is affected by the fluid dates that define the “flu season.” That may fluctuate from October to May or from December through February, depending on the year. For instance, the CDC estimates that “between October 1st, 2019, to April 4th, 2020, about 24,00 to 62,000 people died of influenza.”

 

The CDC indicates that for 2020 up to May 5th, (or 35% of the year), there have been 751,953 deaths from all causes (roughly 95-97% of the expected tally). Influenza deaths accounted for .07% of all deaths, a number consistent for every year from 2013 to 2018.

 

The CDC’s Provisional Death Count for COVID-19 (May 5, 2020), lists 5,910 influenza deaths; 39,910 COVID-19 deaths; 67,372 pneumonia deaths; and 17,683 deaths from pneumonia+COVID-19. The remarkably high spike seems to have occurred due primarily to the roughly 56,000 deaths for this period, 0.07 percent of all U.S. deaths to May 5th, 2020.

 

The standard definition of an emerging disease like COVID-19 appears surprisingly loose. A cluster of characteristic symptoms (flu-like, common cold-like, pneumonia-like), possible contact with a previous patient, and a test result of uncertain accuracy are all that’s needed. Researchers should be able to find a segment of genomic nucleic acid in patient samples, proven by DNA sequencing. That has not been done.

 

Scientists and medical researchers admit they do not know how COVID-19 kills, because to do so would require tissue samples from autopsies. The absence of that data hinders efforts to understand how the new Coronavirus allegedly wreaks havoc. As reported in Nature, “We need those tissues to determine what is killing patients affected by COVID-19. Is it pneumonia? Is it blood clots? Why do they develop kidney failure? We have no clue.”

 

“With COVID-19, the underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are reported on the death certificate. However, the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause more often than not.” [emphasis added]

The weekly death tolls now attributed to an expanded definition from March 21st to April 18th have climbed from 494 to 11,051. But the exemptions and redefinitions suggest that the numbers of deaths attributed to Coronavirus have been counted haphazardly and incorrectly.

 

[1] Damned Lies and Statistics, University of California Press, 2001, p. 160.

 

The co-author of this article, Charles Geshekter, Ph.D., is Emeritus Professor of History at California State University-Chico. He is a three-time Fulbright Scholar and a specialist in modern Somalia. He is currently examining the effects of COVID-19 on Somali communities.

 

https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/05/27/rethinking-covid-19-mortality-statistics-14811

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd OSHA-certified anon explains prob with mask recommendations July 11, 2020, 7 p.m. No.2531   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2539

>>>/qresearch/9934026

 

>let your nose poke out and breathe thru it. they won't say anything, their subconsciousness won't let them

 

>Written by a person with an AB inspectors license.

>“For all you mask wearers (especially those of you who think wearing it outside is NOT stupid ‍♀️). I know I’m about to burst your “google doctor degree” bubble, but here goes nothing.

>So Masks?

>I am OSHA 10&30 certified. I don’t really know WHY OSHA hasn’t come forward and stopped the nonsense BUT I want to cover 3 things:

>1. N95 masks and masks with exhale ports

>2. surgical masks

>3. filter or cloth masks

>SO, upon further inspection, OSHA says some masks are okay in one situation and not okay in certain other situations.

>If you’re working with fumes and aerosol chemicals and you give your employees the wrong masks and they get sick, you can be sued.

 

>• N95 masks: are designed for CONTAMINATED environments. That means when you exhale through N95 the design is that you are exhaling into contamination. The exhale from N95 masks are vented to breath straight out without filtration. They don’t filter the air on the way out. They don’t need to.

>Conclusion: if you’re in Target and the guy with Covid has a N95 mask, his covid breath is unfiltered being exhaled into Target (because it was designed for already contaminated environments, it’s not filtering your air on the way out).

 

>• Surgical Mask: these masks were designed and approved for STERILE environments. The amount of particles and contaminants in the outside and indoor environments where people are CLOGGING these masks very, VERY quickly. The moisture from your breath combined with the clogged mask will render it “useless” IF you come in contact with Covid and your mask traps it, YOU become a walking virus dispenser. Everytime you put your mask on you are breathing the germs from EVERYWHERE you went. They should be changed or thrown out every “20-30 minutes in a non sterile environment.”

 

>• Cloth masks: I can’t even believe I’m having to explain this, but here it goes. Today, three people pointed to their masks as they walked by me entering Lowe’s. They said “ya gotta wear your mask BRO” I said very clearly “those masks don’t work bro, in fact they MAKE you sicker” they “pshh’d” me. By now hopefully you all know CLOTH masks do not filter anything. You mean the American flag one my aunt made? Yes. The one with sunflowers that looks so cute? Yes. The bandanna, the cut up t-shirt, the scarf ALL of them offer NO FILTERING whatsoever.

>As you exhale, you are ridding your lungs of contaminants and carbon dioxide.

> Cloth masks trap this carbon dioxide the best.

>It actually RISKS your health, rather than protect it. The moisture caught in these masks can become mildew ridden over night.

>Dry coughing, enhanced allergies, sore throat are all symptoms of a micro-mold in your mask.

 

>-Ultimate Answer:

>*N95 blows the virus into the air from a contaminated person.

>*The surgical mask is not designed for the outside world and will not filter the virus upon inhaling through it.

>INSTEAD, It’s filtration works on the exhale, (Like a vacuum bag, it only works ONE way) but likely stops after 20 minutes, rendering it useless outside of a

>STERILE ENVIRONMENT (They DO NOT work in public…..not even a little bit).

>*Cloth masks are WORSE than wearing NO mask!!!!!

>It’s equivalent to using a chain link fence to stop mosquitos.

 

>The CDC wants us to keep wearing masks. The masks don’t work.

>They’re being used to provide false comfort and push forward a specific agenda.

>For the love of God, research each mask’s designed use and purpose, I bet you will find NONE are used in the way of “viral defense.”

 

>Just like EVERY Flu season:

>Wash your hands.

>Sanitize your hands.

>Don’t touch stuff.

>Sanitize your phone.

>Don’t touch people.

>And keep your distance.

>Why? Because masks do not work.

 

>*Occupational Safety & Hazard Association sited.

>The top American organization for safety.

>They regulate and educate asbestos workers, surgical rooms, you name it.

>I know, facts suck.

>They throw a wrench into the perfectly (seeming) packaged pill you are willingly swallowing.

>Facts make you have to form your OWN OPINION, instead of regurgitating someone else’s, and I know how uncomfortable that makes a lot of you.

>If your mask gives you security, by all means wear it.

>Just know it is a FALSE SENSE of security and you shouldn’t shame anyone into partaking in such “conspiracies.”

>If select politicians stopped enforcing it, no one would continue this nonsense.

>Don’t drink the kool-aid.”

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses July 11, 2020, 7:21 p.m. No.2538   🗄️.is 🔗kun

from >>>/qresearch/9934192

 

The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses

 

Dr. Denis G Rancourt, PhD — researchgate.net

 

https://www.sott.net/article/434796-The-Science-is-Conclusive-Masks-and-Respirators-do-NOT-Prevent-Transmission-of-Viruses

 

Abstract

 

Masks and respirators do not work. There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.

Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 μm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective-dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.

The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 11, 2020, 7:22 p.m. No.2539   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2531

N95 masks come in different configurations with and without the exhaust port.

 

https://www.govdocs.com/osha-issues-workplace-guidance-on-wearing-masks/

Truth Seeker ID: 1fac93 July 12, 2020, 11:16 a.m. No.2560   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2570 >>2577

Not sure if the anon posting in this thread is still around, but I just wanted to say THANK YOU. Thank you so much for collecting and posting this information here. I cannot even begin to express my gratitude for all your hard work in doing this.

 

I too have been following this "pandemic" since pretty much day one and the messaging and deception has not sat right with me at all. I have also been gathering evidence that blows apart the MSM narrative so if you're interested I'll do my best to post what I have in my research document.

Truth Seeker ID: 0b8c6f July 12, 2020, 4:44 p.m. No.2577   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2581

>>2560

>I have also been gathering evidence that blows apart the MSM narrative so if you're interested I'll do my best to post what I have in my research document.

Yes, please do!

I felt the same - it just did not make sense and there were some obvious lies upon which many decisions were predicated. I couldn't stand it anymore so just started grabbing whatever I saw on QR. Other anons are adding their findings, and we're grateful for all contributions.

Truth Seeker ID: f2d732 July 12, 2020, 6:43 p.m. No.2580   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2089

 

Coronavirus: Why everyone was wrong

The immune response to the virus is stronger than everyone thought

 

The original article was published in the Swiss magazine Weltwoche (World Week) on June 10th. The author, Beda M Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and professor emeritus. Stadler is an important medical professional in Switzerland, he also likes to use provoking language, which should not deter you from the extremely important points he makes.

 

This article is about Switzerland and it does not suggest that the situation is exactly the same globally. I am advocating for local measures according to local situations. And I advocate for looking at real data rather than abstract models. I also suggest to read to the end, because Stadler makes crucial points about testing for Sars-CoV-2.

 

Why everyone was wrong

 

https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1282316044409769986

 

https://medium.com/@vernunftundrichtigkeit/coronavirus-why-everyone-was-wrong-fce6db5ba809

Truth Seeker ID: 365296 Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted July 13, 2020, 10:47 a.m. No.2607   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2089

 

The New England Journal of Medicine editorial titled: Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted, with Anthony Fauci as co-author, has been referenced numerous times on the internet. This editorial has most recently been referenced by Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai (11:03 PM · Jul 12, 2020 tweet attached).

 

Specifically the following citation is of most interest to those referencing the article:

 

"If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively."

 

Something relevant that has been overlooked is Dr. Fauci's Disclosure Statement. Amidst the declared "pandemic", and his primary role on the White House Pandemic Task Force, he claims to have no relationships/conditions/circumstances that present a potential conflict of interest.

 

Concerns about this submitted to the NEJM have gone unanswered. This may not be anything major, except when considering the integrity and ethics of the man that is driving the demise of the US economy and the irrational fear of the general public.

 

Editorial details:

Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted

Submitted by: Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., H. Clifford Lane, M.D., and Robert R. Redfield, M.D.

March 26, 2020

N Engl J Med 2020; 382:1268-1269

DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe2002387

 

Sauce:

 

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2002387

https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMe2002387/suppl_file/nejme2002387_disclosures.pdf

https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1282510921290731524

Truth Seeker ID: 1fac93 July 13, 2020, 4:08 p.m. No.2612   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2613

>>2581

>I will post what relevant stuff I have tomorrow. Some of it may be duplicates of what's been posted here but let's see!

 

I'm gonna post things in specific categories that I've felt are the topics that people tend to clash/argue the most about. Here goes:

 

>Questioning the legitimacy of Chinese data & the official narrative of where the virus started:

The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

 

Did China downplay the coronavirus outbreak early on?

https://www.vox.com/2020/1/27/21082354/coronavirus-outbreak-wuhan-china-early-on-lancet

 

Wuhan Municipal Health and Health Committee's Report on Unexplained Viral Pneumonia

http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2020010509020

 

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext

 

Pneumonia of unknown cause – China

https://www.who.int/csr/don/05-january-2020-pneumonia-of-unkown-cause-china/en/

 

Coronavirus: China’s first confirmed Covid-19 case traced back to November 17

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3074991/coronavirus-chinas-first-confirmed-covid-19-case-traced-back

 

First Covid-19 case happened in November, China government records show - report

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/13/first-covid-19-case-happened-in-november-china-government-records-show-report

 

Coronavirus: Wuhan doctor speaks out against authorities

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/11/coronavirus-wuhan-doctor-ai-fen-speaks-out-against-authorities

 

Real News on Fake Data in China

https://www.wsj.com/articles/real-news-on-fake-data-in-china-1515573859

 

Another Chinese city admits 'fake' economic data

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-economy-data/another-chinese-city-admits-fake-economic-data-idUSKBN1F60I1

 

>Studies on the virus and the accuracy of the "modelling":

Use and abuse of mathematical models: an illustration from the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in the United Kingdom

https://www.oie.int/doc/ged/D3278.PDF

 

Destructive tension: mathematics versus experience – the progress and control of the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain

https://www.oie.int/doc/ged/d10882.pdf

 

Bird flu pandemic 'could kill 150m'

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/sep/30/birdflu.jamessturcke

 

Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

 

Neil Ferguson, the scientist who convinced Boris Johnson of UK coronavirus lockdown, criticised in past for flawed research

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/28/neil-ferguson-scientist-convinced-boris-johnson-uk-coronavirus-lockdown-criticised/

 

Sobering COVID-19 study prompted Britain to toughen its approach

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-research/sobering-covid-19-study-prompted-britain-to-toughen-its-approach-idUKKBN2141EI

 

Fundamental principles of epidemic spread highlight the immediate need for large-scale serological surveys to assess the stage of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.24.20042291v1

 

Oxford Model: Coronavirus May Have Already Infected Half of U.K. Population

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/03/oxford-study-coronavirus-may-have-infected-half-of-u-k.html

 

SARS-CoV-2: fear versus data

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920300972

 

Estimates of the Undetected Rate among the SARS-CoV-2 Infected using Testing Data from Iceland

http://www.igmchicago.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Covid_Iceland_v10.pdf

Truth Seeker ID: 1fac93 July 13, 2020, 4:16 p.m. No.2613   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2614

>>2612

Further information:

 

>Analysis of the official cv19 studies/models:

COVID-19: Data from the Diamond Princess cruise ship implies that UK modelling hugely overestimates the expected death rates from infection

https://www.nicholaslewis.org/covid-19-updated-data-implies-that-uk-modelling-hugely-overestimates-the-expected-death-rates-from-infection/

Backup: https://judithcurry.com/2020/03/25/covid-19-updated-data-implies-that-uk-modelling-hugely-overestimates-the-expected-death-rates-from-infection/

 

Imperial College UK COVID-19 numbers don’t seem to add up

https://www.nicholaslewis.org/imperial-college-uk-covid-19-numbers-dont-seem-to-add-up/

Backup: https://judithcurry.com/2020/04/01/imperial-college-uk-covid-19-numbers-dont-seem-to-add-up/

 

Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309920302437

 

Code Review of Ferguson’s Model

https://lockdownsceptics.org/code-review-of-fergusons-model/

 

Second Analysis of Ferguson’s Model

https://lockdownsceptics.org/second-analysis-of-fergusons-model/

 

A series of tubes

https://thecritic.co.uk/a-series-of-tubes/

 

The Real Fault with Epidemiological Models

https://lockdownsceptics.org/the-real-fault-with-epidemiological-models/

 

A call to honesty in pandemic modeling

https://medium.com/@wpegden/a-call-to-honesty-in-pandemic-modeling-5c156686a64b

 

COVID-19: What’s wrong with the models?

https://peterattiamd.com/covid-19-whats-wrong-with-the-models/

 

Man who spooked the world with coronavirus model walks back his prediction

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-man-spooked-world-coronavirus-model-walks-back-prediction/

 

UK has enough intensive care units for coronavirus, expert predicts

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2238578-uk-has-enough-intensive-care-units-for-coronavirus-expert-predicts/

 

HUGE! Official IHME Model for Coronavirus Used by CDC Just Cut Their Numbers by Half!… They're Making It Up As they Go Along!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/huge-official-imhe-model-coronavirus-used-cdc-just-cut-numbers-half-making-go-along/

 

HUGE! Covid Tracking Website DELETES Information on Hospitalizations, ICU Patients After TGP Reports Numbers Fall Well Below Model Predictions

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/huge-covid-tracking-website-deletes-information-hospitalizations-icu-patients-tgp-reports-numbers-fall-bogus-model-predictions/

 

A critique of Neil Ferguson’s (the Imperial College) pandemic model

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/seeing-the-invisible/a-critique-of-neil-fergusons-the-imperial-college-pandemic-model/

 

OF BITS, BUGS AND RESPONSIBILITY IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE

https://chrisvoncsefalvay.com/2020/05/09/imperial-covid-model/

 

>The response of government to the pandemic as well as the suppression of dissent:

Are Sceptical Voices Being Suppressed?

https://lockdownsceptics.org/are-sceptical-voices-being-suppressed/

 

Will the Largest Quarantine in History Just Make Things Worse?

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/27/opinion/china-wuhan-virus-quarantine.html

 

Leaked mails reveal battle over Denmark's lockdown

https://www.thelocal.dk/20200529/leaked-emails-show-how-denmarks-pm-steam-rollered-her-own-health-agency

 

Regeringen bremsede positive coronatal (Article is in Danish, emails are embedded within the page)

https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/politik/danskpolitik/regeringen-bremsede-positive-coronatal/8139077

 

German official leaks report denouncing corona as 'a global false alarm'

https://www.sott.net/article/435434-German-official-leaks-report-denouncing-corona-as-a-global-false-alarm

 

"Expertise nicht ignorieren": Wissenschaftler kritisieren BMI für Umgang mit Corona-Papier (article is in German)

https://deutsch.rt.com/inland/102396-umstrittene-bmi-analyse-wissenschaftler-kritisieren/

 

Leaked German document from BMI

https://www.ichbinanderermeinung.de/Dokument93.pdf

If this link is broken, I am happy to provide a copy.

 

Who's who on secret scientific group advising UK government?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/24/coronavirus-whos-who-on-secret-scientific-group-advising-uk-government-sage

 

SAGE Minutes from the meetings to discuss the UKs response to the pandemic

SAGE 12 (Published 29/05/2020): https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sage-minutes-coronavirus-covid-19-response-3-march-2020

The rest of the minutes can be found via that website.

 

Nightingale emergency coronavirus hospital may not be needed as urgently as expected

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/03/nightingale-emergency-coronavirus-hospital-london

 

London NHS Nightingale hospital will shut next week

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/04/london-nhs-nightingale-hospital-placed-on-standby

Truth Seeker ID: 1fac93 July 13, 2020, 4:20 p.m. No.2614   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2615

>>2613

More info:

 

>How to stay healthy and boost immune system:

Vitamin D and the Immune System

https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC3166406&blobtype=pdf

 

The immunological case for staying active during the COVID-19 pandemic

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7165095/

 

Effect of forest bathing trips on human immune function

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2793341/

 

>How they report cases and the validity of tests

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/

[Off Guardian have done an incredible job of covering this scamdemic]

 

Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/

 

Tens of thousands of coronavirus tests have been double-counted, officials admit

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/tens-thousands-coronavirus-tests-have-double-counted-officials/

 

Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html

[basically stating that test = cases = outbreak = panic, this is from 2007!]

 

Unødvendig å teste store grupper av friske ved lite koronasmitte - Folkehelseinstituttet (Norwegian Institute of Public Health)

https://www.fhi.no/nyheter/2020/unodvendig-a-teste-store-grupper-av-friske-ved-lite-koronasmitte/

 

Molekylær diagnostikk av Sars-Cov-2 - Folkehelseinstituttet (Norwegian Institute of Public Health)

https://www.fhi.no/nettpub/coronavirus/testing-og-oppfolging-av-smittede/molekylar-diagnostikk/

 

Fantastic link with tons of info & stats:

https://pastebin.com/fRQRf9gX

 

https://twitter.com/boriquagato/status/1267174557976166402

Graphical analysis of Covid deaths

 

What Is The True Level Of Mortality Caused By The Covid-19 Virus?

https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2020-4-27-what-is-the-real-level-of-mortality-from-the-chinese-flu

 

I have herd immunity

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/I-have-herd-immunity

 

Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek discusses how COVID 19 death certificates are being manipulated

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5wn1qs_bBk

 

CDC instructions for coding cv deaths

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/coronavirus/Alert-2-New-ICD-code-introduced-for-COVID-19-deaths.pdf

Truth Seeker ID: 1fac93 July 13, 2020, 4:23 p.m. No.2615   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2616

>>2614

 

More stuff about cases being counted fraudulently to boost the figures:

RKI in Germany admits that all deaths that test positive to Covid are counted as deaths caused by Covid: https://swprs.org/rki-relativiert-corona-todesfaelle/

Google Translate: “The President of the German Robert Koch Institute confirmed on March 20, 2020 that test-positive deceased people are counted as "corona deaths" regardless of the real cause of death: "We consider someone with a corona virus infection to be a corona death was, «said the RKI President when asked a journalist (see video below).

 

According to experts, the number of deaths is severely relativized, since the patients die in many cases from their previous illnesses and not from the virus. Data from Italy show that over 99% of the deceased had one or more chronic medical conditions, including cancer and heart problems, and only 12% mentioned the coronavirus on the death certificate as a cofactor.

 

A look at the statistics of the German test-positive deaths shows that the median age of the deceased, similar to Italy, is over 80 years and that there were usually one or more serious previous illnesses. The so-called over - mortality caused by Covid-19 is therefore likely to be close to or close to zero in Germany, similar to other European countries.”

Attached video (answer is at 16:25): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tI5SnAirYLw&feature=youtu.be&t=985

 

How accurate are the tests?

https://english.alarabiya.net/en/life-style/healthy-living/2020/02/29/Some-US-labs-to-be-allowed-use-coronavirus-tests-prior-to-review

https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/sars-cov-2-coronavirus-multiplex-rt-qpcr-kit-277854-457.htm

“This product is intended for the detection of 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment.”

 

When testing using PCR kits and one is looking only for SARS-CoV-2 in the results this is what you will find, despite the fact that there could be other viral loads within the sample that share a very similar genetic makeup to that of the virus which may have caused the particular respiratory disease. Therefore one cannot state for a fact that SARS-CoV-2 was the virus that caused the respiratory disease that killed the patient.

 

Test for Past Infection (Antibody Test)

CDC – 30/06/2020

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/testing/serology-overview.html

https://archive.vn/dQUVE

 

Germany – the number of cases are increasing exponentially due to the fact that the number of tests are increasing exponentially, not the fact that the pandemic is spreading out of control

https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/coronavirus-irrefuhrung-fallzahlen

Google Translate:

“Coronavirus: Misleading case numbers now proven

So far, the Robert Koch Institute and the federal government have avoided collecting and publishing the number of weekly corona tests in Germany. Instead, fear and panic were fuelled with out of context cases. Official data now prove for the first time that the rapid increase in the number of cases essentially results from an increase in the number of tests.”

Truth Seeker ID: 1fac93 July 13, 2020, 4:38 p.m. No.2616   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2617

>>2615

>More info about cases:

 

China stopped including asymptomatic patients in their official count: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/world/asia/china-coronavirus-cases.html

 

Covid19 Death Figures “A Substantial Over-Estimate”

https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/05/covid19-death-figures-a-substantial-over-estimate/

 

“Think deep, do good science and do not panic!”

https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/07/think-deep-do-good-science-and-do-not-panic/

 

Has COVID-19 Testing Made the Problem Worse?

https://digwithin.net/2020/04/08/covid-19-testing/

 

Washington state over-reporting COVID-19 deaths

https://www.freedomfoundation.com/washington/washington-state-over-reporting-covid-19-deaths/

 

Washington health officials: Gunshot victims counted as COVID-19 deaths

https://www.freedomfoundation.com/washington/washington-health-officials-gunshot-victims-counted-as-covid-19-deaths/

 

>WHO and corruption

World Health Organization Director-General Was Accused Of Covering Up Epidemics In 2017

https://cloverchronicle.com/2020/01/30/world-health-organization-director-general-was-accused-of-covering-up-epidemics-in-2017/

 

EXCLUSIVE: Evidence Shows Director General of World Health Organization Severely Overstated the Fatality Rate of the Coronavirus Leading to the Greatest Global Panic in History

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/exclusive-evidence-shows-director-general-of-world-health-organization-severely-overstated-the-fatality-rate-of-the-coronavirus-leading-to-the-greatest-global-panic-in-history/

 

WHO Director is first who is not a medical doctor

https://www.roughestimate.org/roughestimate/the-crimes-of-tedros-adhanom

 

UN launches new initiative to fight COVID-19 misinformation through ‘digital first responders’

https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/05/1064622

 

>Empty hospitals during the "height of the pandemic"

Florida hospitals being emptied:

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article241530156.html

 

Empty hospitals in Bangladesh:

https://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/news/admission-hospitals-patients-left-quandary-1884925

 

Ghost Town NYC – Are New York Times Lies Fueling Pandemic Panic with #FakeNews?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqS-mconfQc

 

3/100 beds in Swiss hospital intensive care occupied:

https://www.aargauerzeitung.ch/aargau/kanton-aargau/erst-3-von-100-aargauer-betten-der-intensivstationen-sind-belegt-so-ruesten-sich-die-spitaeler-auf-die-epidemie-137332716

 

More empty hospitals:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-oqXC2ZnM - removed by YT

 

https://youtu.be/wJlWrJ5JQNE - removed by YT

 

"Workers" in hazmat suits claiming they removed a corona death from an apartment despite the man being alive

https://youtu.be/UECFNbJpcow

 

NYC Medical Examiner NOT at Capacity but Confirms Construction of Supplemental Morgue Facility

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVGV3VFexdg&feature=youtu.be&t=150

 

Live Footage from Inside an Italian Hospital in Treviso - 21st March 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VU-79l52oDo

 

Empty hospitals in the US

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N94T_nKMKM4 - removed by YT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9hVrg6zXVc - removed by YT

 

Empty hospitals in Berlin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsWY5NMuCPg - removed by YT

 

Empty hospitals in Spain

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVTBabRLJ-U - removed by YT

 

I'm really annoyed I didn't save these earlier, is there a way to find if they've been re-upped somewhere else? Does the Wayback Machine support this?

Truth Seeker ID: 1fac93 July 13, 2020, 4:46 p.m. No.2617   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2618

>>2616

>More empty hospitals:

TWO HOUR video in front Elmhurst AFTER WARZONE declared literally NOTHING!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qupPF9wBhY

 

>How do you explain the excess deaths during the lockdown/quarantine period?

All-cause mortality during COVID-19: No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341832637_All-cause_mortality_during_COVID-19_No_plague_and_a_likely_signature_of_mass_homicide_by_government_response

 

>How/When/Where Did the Virus Actually Begin?

Coronavirus: pathogen could have been spreading in humans for years, study says

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3077442/coronavirus-pathogen-could-have-been-spreading-humans-decades

 

SARS-CoV-2 in human sewage in Santa Catalina, Brazil, November 2019

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.26.20140731v1

 

Coronavirus found in Barcelona waste water sample from March 2019

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/26/scientists-barcelona-find-covid-19-waste-water-march-2019-nine/

 

Detectan el SARS-CoV-2 en aguas residuales recogidas en Barcelona el 12 marzo de 2019

https://www.ub.edu/web/ub/es/menu_eines/noticies/2020/06/042.html

 

Coronavirus was already in Italy by December, waste water study finds

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53106444

 

Coronavirus: France's first known case 'was in December'

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52526554

 

"J'avais des douleurs au thorax": le patient infecté par le coronavirus en décembre témoigne

https://www.bfmtv.com/sante/j-avais-des-douleurs-au-thorax-le-patient-infecte-par-le-coronavirus-en-decembre-temoigne_AV-202005050031.html

 

Coronavirus: First US deaths weeks earlier than thought

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52385558

 

Coronavirus outbreak may have started in September and possibly not in Wuhan, scientists say

https://www.theblaze.com/coronavirus-origin-date-location-cambridge-study

 

Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes

https://www.pnas.org/content/117/17/9241

 

Anecdotally - I believe that I had covid back in early December of 2019 after flying from the UK to Iceland. I had the typical runny nose and sore throat. I was also basically in bed for about 3 days just sleeping and trying to recover. After getting better I had a dry cough that lasted a good 4-5 weeks. This leads me to believe the virus has been circulating far longer than we realise and that all these deaths that we see in March/April are due to the lockdown measures.

Truth Seeker ID: 1fac93 July 13, 2020, 4:57 p.m. No.2618   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2617

 

>MASKS - everyone's new favorite topic

Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

 

Keeping workers and customers safe during COVID-19 in restaurants, pubs, bars and takeaway services

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5eb96e8e86650c278b077616/working-safely-during-covid-19-restaurants-pubs-bars-takeaways-030720.pdf

UK government states that masks are basically ineffective in an official document.

 

A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

 

>Sites that I have visited for an alternative view on things:

UK based site that has been extremely critical of the government's response to the virus. LOTS of reading on the side bar - highly recommend it

https://lockdownsceptics.org/

 

A supposed Swiss doctor has compiled an incredible amount of studies and other articles BTFOing the official narrative. An incredible resource.

https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/

 

These have been doing some great investigation in regards to the pandemic among other things:

https://off-guardian.org/

 

Perspectives on the Pandemic - a great set of interviews with doctors/scientists/nurses providing an alternative view on the pandemic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIDsKdeFOmQ&list=PLlGSlkijht5jFHF2o8rIhiOPHNT1OzyWE

Download them before they get nuked!

 

That's all I have for now.

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 13, 2020, 4:58 p.m. No.2619   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/9952415

 

Mask Facts

June 1, 2020

 

https://aapsonline.org/mask-facts/

curated by Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D.

 

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2

 

Note: A COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) particle is 0.125 micrometers (μm); influenza virus size is 0.08 – 0.12 μm; a human hair is about 150 μm.

 

*1 nm = 0.001 micron; 1000 nm = 1 micron; Micrometer (μm) is the preferred name for micron (an older term)

 

1 meter is = 1,000,000,000 nm or 1,000,000 microns

 

Droplets

 

Virus is transmitted through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs, sneezes or talks. Larger respiratory droplets (>5 μm) remain in the air for only a short time and travel only short distances, generally <1 meter. They fall to the ground quickly. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30245-9/fulltext

 

This idea guides the CDC’s advice to maintain at least a 6-foot distance.

 

Virus-laden small (<5 μm) aerosolized droplets can remain in the air for at least 3 hours and travel long distances. https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMc2004973?articleTools=true

 

Air currents

 

In air conditioned environment these large droplets may travel farther.

 

However, ventilation — even the opening of an entrance door and a small window can dilute the number of small droplets to one half after 30 seconds. (This study looked at droplets from uninfected persons). This is clinically relevant because poorly ventilated and populated spaces, like public transport and nursing homes, have high SARS-CoV-2 disease transmission despite physical distancing. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30245-9/fulltext

 

Objects and surfaces

 

Person to person touching

 

The CDC’s most recent statement regarding contracting COVID-19 from touching surfaces: “Based on data from lab studies on Covid-19 and what we know about similar respiratory diseases, it may be possible that a person can get Covid-19 by touching a surface or object that has the virus on it and then touching their own mouth, nose or possibly their eyes,” the agency wrote. “But this isn’t thought to be the main way the virus spreads. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/s0522-cdc-updates-covid-transmission.html.

 

Chinese study with data taken from swabs on surfaces around the hospital

 

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-0885_article?deliveryName=USCDC_333-DM25707

 

The surfaces where tested with the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, which greatly amplifies the viral genetic material if it is present. That material is detectable when a person is actively infected. This is thought to be the most reliable test.

 

Computer mouse (ICU 6/8, 75%; General ward (GW) 1/5, 20%)

 

Trash cans (ICU 3/5, 60%; GW 0/8)

 

Sickbed handrails (ICU 6/14, 42.9%; GW 0/12)

 

Doorknobs (GW 1/12, 8.3%)

 

81.3% of the miscellaneous personal items were positive:

 

Exercise equipment

 

Medical equipment (spirometer, pulse oximeter, nasal cannula)

 

PC and iPads

 

Reading glasses

 

Cellular phones (83.3% positive for viral RNA)

 

Remote controls for in-room TVs (64.7% percent positive)

 

Toilets (81.0% positive)

 

Room surfaces (80.4% of all sampled)

 

Bedside tables and bed rails (75.0%)

 

Window ledges (81.8%)

 

Plastic: up to 2-3 days

 

Stainless Steel: up to 2-3 days

 

Cardboard: up to 1 day

 

Copper: up to 4 hours

 

Floor – gravity causes droplets to fall to the floor. Half of ICU workers all had virus on the bottoms of their shoes

 

Filter Efficiency and Fit

 

*Data from a University of Illinois at Chicago review

 

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data

 

                  • -

 

HEPA (high efficiency particulate air) filters – 99.97 – 100% efficient. HEPA filters are tested with particles that are 0.125 μm.

 

Masks and respirators work by collecting particles through several physical mechanisms, including diffusion (small particles) and interception and impaction (large particles)

 

N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) are constructed from electret (a dielectric material that has a quasi-permanent electric charge. An electret generates internal and external electric fields so the filter material has electrostatic attraction for additional collection of all particle sizes. As flow increases, particles will be collected less efficiently.

 

N95 – A properly fitted N95 will block 95% of tiny air particles down to 0.3 μm from reaching the wearer’s face. https://www.honeywell.com/en-us/newsroom/news/2020/03/n95-masks-explained.

 

But even these have problems: many have exhalation valve for easier breathing and less moisture inside the mask.

 

Surgical masks are designed to protect patients from a surgeon’s respiratory droplets, aren’t effective at blocking particles smaller than 100 μm. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:VLXWeZBll7YJ:https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/957730O/respirators-and-surgical-masks-contrast-technical-bulletin.pdf+&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

 

Filter efficiency was measured across a wide range of small particle sizes (0.02 to 1 µm) at 33 and 99 L/min.

 

N95 respirators had efficiencies greater than 95% (as expected).

 

T-shirts had 10% efficiency,

 

Scarves 10% to 20%,

 

Cloth masks 10% to 30%,

 

Sweatshirts 20% to 40%, and

 

Towels 40%.

 

All of the cloth masks and materials had near zero efficiency at 0.3 µm, a particle size that easily penetrates into the lungs.

 

Another study evaluated 44 masks, respirators, and other materials with similar methods and small aerosols (0.08 and 0.22 µm).

 

N95 FFR filter efficiency was greater than 95%.

 

Medical masks – 55% efficiency

 

General masks – 38% and

 

Handkerchiefs – 2% (one layer) to 13% (four layers) efficiency.

 

Conclusion: Wearing masks will not reduce SARS-CoV-2.

 

N95 masks protect health care workers, but are not recommended for source control transmission.

 

Surgical masks are better than cloth but not very efficient at preventing emissions from infected patients.

 

Cloth masks will be ineffective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, whether worn as source control or as personal protective equipment (PPE).

 

“Masks may confuse that message and give people a false sense of security. If masks had been the solution in Asia, shouldn’t they have stopped the pandemic before it spread elsewhere?”

 

*The first randomized controlled trial of cloth masks. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

 

Penetration of cloth masks by particles was 97% and medical masks 44%, 3M Vflex 9105 N95 (0.1%), 3M 9320 N95 (<0.01%).

 

Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.

 

The virus may survive on the surface of the face- masks

 

Self-contamination through repeated use and improper doffing is possible. A contaminated cloth mask may transfer pathogen from the mask to the bare hands of the wearer.

 

Cloth masks should not be recommended for health care workers, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated.

 

*A study of 4 patients in South Korea

 

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342

 

                  • -

 

Known patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 wore masks and coughed into a Petrie dish. “Both surgical and cotton masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS–CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19 to the environment and external mask surface.”

 

*Singapore Study – Few people used mask correctly

 

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/publichealth/86601

 

Overall, data were collected from 714 men and women. About half the sample were women and all adult ages were represented. Only 90 participants (12.6%, 95% CI 10.3%-15.3%) passed the visual mask fit test. About three-quarters performed strap placement incorrectly, 61% left a “visible gap between the mask and skin,” and about 60% didn’t tighten the nose-clip.

 

*A 2011 randomized Australian clinical trial of standard medical/surgical masks

 

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00198.x?fbclid=IwAR3kRYVYDKb0aR-su9_me9_vY6a8KVR4HZ17J2A_80f_fXUABRQdhQlc8Wo

 

Medical masks offered no protection at all from influenza.

 

Conclusions from Organizations

 

The World Health Organization (WHO):

 

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331693/WHO-2019-nCov-IPC_Masks-2020.3-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

 

“Advice to decision makers on the use of masks for healthy people in community settings

 

As described above, the wide use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not supported by current evidence and carries uncertainties and critical risks.”

 

“Medical masks should be reserved for health care workers. The use of medical masks in the community may create a false sense of security, with neglect of other essential measures, such as hand hygiene practices and physical distancing, and may lead to touching the face under the masks and under the eyes, result in unnecessary costs, and take masks away from those in health care who need them most, especially when masks are in short supply.”

 

“Masks are effective only when used in combination with frequent hand-cleaning with alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water.”

 

WHO acknowledges that most people do not use masks properly.

 

Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the Center for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases:

 

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/t0131-2019-novel-coronavirus.html

 

“We don’t routinely recommend the use of face masks by the public to prevent respiratory illness,” said on January 31. “And we certainly are not recommending that at this time for this new virus.”

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

 

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/infectioncontrol/maskguidance.htm

 

In March 5, 2019 regarding the flu: “Masks are not usually recommended in non-healthcare settings; however, this guidance provides other strategies for limiting the spread of influenza viruses in the community:

 

cover their nose and mouth when coughing or sneezing,

 

use tissues to contain respiratory secretions and, after use, to dispose of them in the nearest waste receptacle, and

 

perform hand hygiene (e.g., handwashing with non-antimicrobial soap and water, and alcohol-based hand rub if soap and water are not available) after having contact with respiratory secretions and contaminated objects/materials.

 

From the New England Journal of Medicine

 

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372

 

“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”

 

Final Thoughts

 

Surgical masks – loose fitting. They are designed to protect the patient from the doctors’ respiratory droplets. The wearer is not protected from others airborne particles

 

People do not wear masks properly. Most people have the mask under the nose. The wearer does not have glasses on and the eyes are a portal of entry.

 

The designer masks and scarves offer minimal protection – they give a false sense of security to both the wearer and those around the wearer.

 

**Not to mention they add a perverse lightheartedness to the situation.

 

If you are walking alone, no mask – avoid folks – that is common sense.

 

Remember – children under 2 should not wear masks – accidental suffocation and difficulty breathing in some

 

If wearing a mask makes people go out and get Vitamin D – go for it. In the 1918 flu pandemic people who went outside did better. Early reports are showing people with COVID-19 with low Vitamin D do worse than those with normal levels. Perhaps that is why shut-ins do so poorly. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.08.20058578v4

 

If you are sick, stay home!

 

Additional Resource: Healthy People Wearing Masks, Should They or Shouldn’t They? This ER nurse with over two decades of experience took a deep dive into the science to find out: https://jennifermargulis.net/healthy-people-wearing-masks-during-covid19/

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 14, 2020, 10:01 a.m. No.2635   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/9958527

Local doctor pushing proven treatment of COVID into national debate

BRAWLEY – A front-line local doctor treating COVID-19 patients claims to have figured out what works to keep his patients alive. He claims to have answers on better controlling, and curbing, a pandemic that knows no boundaries.

Here is the letter Fareed sent to President Trump:

 

Dear President Trump and Task Force,

My name is Dr. George Fareed. I am a physician in Imperial County, California, that has been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic. I take care of patients on both an outpatient and inpatient basis, as well as nursing home patients, the most vulnerable among us.

In this letter, I am proposing a medical strategy that can help us not only through this current crisis, but also that will enable us to approach outbreaks of COVID-19 that may occur in the future.

In my attempts to keep people alive, I have had an opportunity to use many different types of treatments — remdesivir, dexamethasone, convalescent plasma replacement, etc.Yet, by far the best tool beyond supportive care with oxygen has been the combination of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), with either azithromycin or doxycycline, and zinc. This "HCQ cocktail" (that costs less than $100) has enabled me to prevent patients from being admitted to the hospital, as well as help those patients that are hospitalized. The key is giving the HCQ cocktail early, within the first five days of the disease.

Not only have I seen outstanding results with this approach, I have not seen any patient exhibit serious side-effects. To be clear — this drug has been used as an anti-malarial and to treat systemic lupus erythematosus as well as rheumatoid arthritis, and hasover a 50-year track record for safety.It is shocking that it only now is being characterized as a dangerous drug.

 

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/local-doctor-pushing-proven-treatment-of-covid-into-national-debate/article_ca59497a-c539-11ea-8943-4f707d6ebc1a.html

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 14, 2020, 10:05 a.m. No.2636   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2701

>>>/qresearch/9958598

 

Florida Labs Acknowledge Major Errors After Reporting Positivity Rates Of 100%

 

Florida health officials left COVID-19 trackers slackjawed on Sunday when it reported more than 15k new infections in just 24 hours on Sunday (the data were gleaned from the prior day). But as hospitalizations surge, questions have grown about whether the state is still trying to 'juke' its data, something that a now infamous whistleblower alleged before she was fired (she has since started her own COVID-19 data portal relying on public info).

Journalists scouring the reams of daily data for discrepancies have apparently happened upon bombshell they had been hoping for: Orlando Health has just confirmed that some of the data it shared over the weekend were wrong, after journalists reported more than 50 labs showing 100% positivity rate, or roughly around there. One local Fox affiliate looked into the numbers and contacted a few of the labs to confirm that their internal data matched the public data released by the state.

As it turned out, some of these discrepancies were pretty extreme: Orlando Health, one of the organizations contacted by Fox, confirmed that its positivity rate wasactually 9.8%, not the 98% that had been reported to the state.

The report showed that Orlando Health had a 98 percent positivity rate. However, when FOX 35 News contacted the hospital, they confirmed errors in the report. Orlando Health's positivity rate is only 9.4 percent, not 98 percent as in the report.

The report also showed that the Orlando Veteran’s Medical Center had apositivity rate of 76%. A spokesperson for the VA told FOX 35 News on Tuesday that this does not reflect their numbers and that the positivity rate for the centeris actually 6 percent.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/several-florida-labs-report-positivity-rates-100

 

''Hmm…wonder if the decimal points moved as a result of data entry error or using wrong data field in a form…or human error…

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 14, 2020, 10:24 a.m. No.2637   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/07/to_mask_or_not_to_mask.html

 

To Mask or Not to Mask?

By Anthony J. Ciani

 

They acquit the asymptomatic who might spread "WuFlu" and comfort those who fear it. They may be nothing more than a pocket full of posies, as discussed by Drs. Brosseau and Sietsema, but aren't their psychological effects beneficial? What if masks do worse than nothing?

 

At the beginning of the WuFlu, the CDC recommended against masks. The CDC now claims that based on recent research, certain types of respirators are effective against SARS-CoV-2. The CDC cites decades-old research concerning asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission, but it fails to cite any direct research on the effectiveness of masks at reducing viral transmission. Instead, the CDC and WHO assume that masks block the droplets emitted by coughing and sneezing, and they probably do.

 

Medical practitioners wear masks to reduce the chance of infecting open wounds with spittle from their mouths as they talk above their patients and to protect themselves as patients sneeze and cough within a couple feet of their health care providers. Despite the protective equipment, nurses and doctors still catch infections from and give infections to their patients, but properly worn equipment reduces close quarters spread by as much as 75%.

 

Great for the E.R. and ICU, but masks have been mandated to prevent spread from the asymptomatic in the general population, who rarely cough, sneeze, or spit into the faces of others except as a form of assault. If the droplets emitted from coughing and sneezing fall to the ground within six feet, does it make sense that a virus spreads even without masks? A garden hose on mist is good for plants two feet away, but not so good for plants four feet away. Moreover, are the asymptomatic coughing and sneezing at all?

 

Aerosols, not droplets, are the primary mechanism of spread among the public. In 2005, research found that sub-micron virus particles produced deep in the lungs were exhaled into the air by normal breathing. Place your hand in front of your mouth as you exhale. That moisture is an ultra-fine aerosol of particles too small to see under a microscope and, assuming that your mask was designed to filter outgoing air (they rarely are), too small to be effectively filtered. Less than a micron in size, these particles hang in the air indefinitely, like smoke or odors, which are composed of similarly sized particles. Consider an infected person as a smoker or stick of burning incense. Where and when you can smell smoke is where and when you can catch their virus. Can you smell smoke through your mask?

 

As expected, SARS-CoV-2 was experimentally found to penetrate surgical masks via normal breathing and even when rigged as powered air filters between hamster cages (a joke of Chinese slapdash science). Mask-wearing Asian countries have no less influenza that non-wearing Western countries. Studies on arms-length spread within the general population are few, but they generally show masks as ineffective. Even the best N95 respirators are unlikely to show much effect; the virus is a third of the particle size they filter.

 

Ironically, anti-smoking laws may have helped viruses spread. Restaurants, hotels, and bars once used strong upward ventilation and electronic air cleaners or HEPA filters to remove smoke. HEPA sets N100 (99.97%) at 0.3 microns and may have some efficacy at removing viruses. Modern eateries and clubs have no need for filtering indoor smoke, so they have efficient HVAC systems that circulate the air around and use filters suitable only for dust bunnies.

 

Masks and HEPA filters are depth filters, which are random meshes that impede the paths of particles. Impede does not mean stop. Push the particles long enough, and they will get through. Put enough particles into the filter, and they push through those ahead. One study showed that freshly opened surgical masks reduced the exhalation of bacteria by 75%, but after 120 minutes of use, a surgical mask no longer blocked bacteria, and after 150 minutes, a surgical mask exposed the patient to 50% more bacteria than no mask. Change your filters, be they for masks, engines, oil, or water.

 

If soiled masks spray patients with bacteria, what about the lungs of the wearer? Ventilator-associated pneumonia is a leading cause of death. William Shatner tells you to clean your CPAP for a reason. The lungs normally expel bacteria, but when the ventilator or mask blocks them and sends them back in, people develop pneumonia. The research on self-inflicted pneumonia due to prolonged facial covering is scarce. The CDC recommends changing masks after every patient.

 

There is considerable research on ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). The use of ventilators for COVID-19 is mind-boggling. Intubation carries about a 1% risk of pneumonia per day, and pneumonia carries a 20% fatality rate in the ICU. Put a COVID-19 patient on a ventilator for ten days, and that means a total risk of death of 2% from VAP, which is about half the risk of an ICU patient dying from COVID-19. CPAP-style ventilation has a tenth of the risk of intubation, but hospitals used intubation. Medicare pays a lot better for intubation than CPAP, and Congress sweetened the pot just for COVID-19.

 

Assuming that masks carry a similar risk to CPAP, wearing the same mask for an eight-hour workday carries a 0.03% chance per day of pneumonia. Multiply by five for a week, and then 0.2 for the chance of dying from pneumonia, and that produces a 0.03% chance per week of death due to wearing a mask at work. There are currently about 4 million retail sales workers, which would mean 1,200 excess pneumonia deaths per week caused by retail mask mandates. According to the CDC's data, thousands more people than normal are dying every week of pneumonia with no connection to COVID-19. Point zero four percent is the estimated infection fatality rate for SARS-CoV-2 in people under 70. In this estimate, wearing a mask for a work week is about as dangerous as getting the "WuFlu."

 

At my workplace, 13% of the employees have complained to me about how unhealthy they feel wearing their masks. I have overheard retail workers complaining to coworkers about how they feel sick, burning in their lungs, and coughing because of their masks. Masks are the "sorry," not the "better safe." Those at greatest risk from the "WuFlu" venture out, unaware of the odorless death penetrating their masks. Those who are knowingly ill venture out, thinking their masks are protecting others. Wearing masks for hours at a time exposes the wearer's lungs to unhealthy levels of bacteria.

Truth Seeker ID: 0fc600 July 14, 2020, 2:29 p.m. No.2643   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/9961319

 

https://www.redstate.com/michael_thau/2020/07/13/many-medical-experts-were-against-lockdowns-the-media-just-didnt-want-us-know/

 

Literally Thousands of Doctors and Scientists Have Come Out Against Fauci’s Lockdowns Including a Nobel Prize-Winning Biophysicist. The Media Just Doesn’t Want You to Know

 

repost with proper image

Truth Seeker ID: cd4687 July 14, 2020, 5:23 p.m. No.2644   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/9963061

The well-known Norwegian virologist Birger Sørensen and his colleagues have examined the corona virus. They believe it has certain properties which would not evolve naturally.

 

“We have examined which components of the virus are especially well suited to attach themselves to cells in humans. And we have done this by comparing the properties of the virus with human genetics. What we found was that this virus was exceptionally well adjusted to infect humans.”

 

It is already known that the novel coronavirus, like the virus that caused the SARS epidemic in Southeast Asia in 2002-2003, could attach itself to the ACE-2 receptors in the lower respiratory tract.

“But what we have discovered is that there are properties in this new virus which enables it to use an additional receptor, and create a binding to human cells in the upper respiratory tract and the intestines which is strong enough to produce an infection,” Sørensen elaborates.

 

In the already published article Sørensen and his colleagues Angus Dalgleish and Andres Susrud describe what they claim is curious about the spike protein of the coronavirus, which makes it especially well suited to infect humans. These findings are the foundation for the hypothesis Sørensen and his colleagues develop in the new article, where they claim that the virus is not natural in origin.

“There are several factors that point towards this,” says Sørensen. “Firstly, this part of the virus is very stable; it mutates very little. That points to this virus as a fully developed, almost perfected virus for infecting humans.

 

“Secondly, this indicates that the structure of the virus cannot have evolved naturally. When we compare the novel coronavirus with the one that caused SARS, we see that there are altogether six inserts in this virus that stand out compared to other known SARS viruses,” he goes on explaining.

 

Sørensen says that several of these changes in the virus are unique, and that they do not exist in other known SARS coronaviruses.

“Four of these six changes have the property that they are suited to infect humans. This kind of aggregation of a type of property can be done simply in a laboratory, and helps to substantiate such an origin,” Sørensen points out.

 

Asked about whether this implies that the virus is not natural, Sørensen goes on to explain the laboratory process that leads to the creation of new viruses.

“In a sense it is natural. But the natural processes have most likely been accelerated in a laboratory,” he explains. “It’s also possible for a virus to attain these properties in nature, but it’s not likely. If the mutations had happened in nature, we would have most likely seen that the virus had attracted other properties through mutations, not just properties that help the virus to attach itself to human cells.”

 

“What we see is that an area that you could observe in the first SARS coronavirus has been moved, so that the parts of the virus that are particularly well suited to attach to humans, have become part of the spike protein that the virus uses to penetrate human cells. And it is this moving of the area of the virus which makes the virus, together with the injected areas explained above, able to utilise an additional receptor to infect humans.”

 

“I think it’s more than 90 percent certain. It’s at least a far more probable explanation than it having developed this way in nature”, Sørensen responds.

“The properties that we now see in the virus, we have yet to discover anywhere in nature. We know that these properties make the virus very infectious, so if it came from nature, there should also be many animals infected with this, but we have still not been able to trace the virus in nature.

 

“The only place we are aware of where an equivalent virus to that which causes Covid-19 exists, is in a laboratory. So the simplest and most logical explanation is that it comes from a laboratory. Those who claim otherwise, have the burden of proof,” Sørensen says.

 

https://www.minervanett.no/corona/the-most-logical-explanation-is-that-it-comes-from-a-laboratory/361860

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 15, 2020, 6:10 a.m. No.2653   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/stunning-texas-coronavirus-numbers-show-covid-19-less-lethal-last-two-flu-seasons/

 

Stunning! Texas Coronavirus Numbers Show COVID-19 Less Lethal than Last Two Flu Seasons

By Jim Hoft

Published July 14, 2020 at 6:29pm

 

This is really STUNNING information!

The Texas Department of Health released numbers recently comparing the coronavirus to the last two seasonal flu viruses.

 

The coronavirus was actually less lethal than the flu in the state!

The fle had a mortality rate of 0.03% and 0.04%.

The coronavirus has a mortality rate of 0.01% in Texas.

 

This won’t make any headlines.

 

Via Dr. Andrew Bostom.

Truth Seeker ID: 0b8c6f July 15, 2020, 9:16 a.m. No.2655   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Hydroxychloroquine Should Be Available Over the Counter

by John and Andy Schlafly

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/johnandandyschlafly/2020/07/15/hydroxychloroquine-should-be-available-over-the-counter-n2572496

 

It is time to take the bull by the horns to conquer the Wuhan virus. Drastic action is necessary, like on December 8, 1941 after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor.

 

President Trump should order immediate public access to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) by making the medication available over-the-counter (OTC). Liberals have interfered with public access to this medication for COVID-19 through the old-fashioned route of requiring a prescription and then having a pharmacist fill or reject the prescription.

 

Millions of Americans do not visit physicians, and cannot obtain a prescription for HCQ if they did. Even if you have been exposed to COVID-19, you cannot obtain a prescription for HCQ in most states because regulators prohibit dispensing it without a positive test result, which typically cannot be obtained until late in the progression of the disease.

 

No one credibly doubts that HCQ is safe, and safer than many medications currently available OTC. No one credibly doubts the dozens of studies showing that early use of HCQ, pre-exposure and immediately after exposure to COVID, has helped many overcome this dreaded disease.

 

Americans do not need a prescription to obtain hundreds of medications which once required a prescription. Nexium, Prevacid, Prilosec, Claritin, Flonase, and Primatene Mist are medications that have been shifted from Rx to OTC in recent years, not because the medical establishment pushed for the change, but because of public demand for it.

 

No demand is higher at this time than for a medication which helps prevent against COVID. Yet Americans are not being allowed to access the medication which they want and need, and instead are being told by FDA and state officials that they cannot have it.

 

Last month the Oregon pharmacy board, for example, blocked HCQ access as follows: “Prescription orders for chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 infection may only be dispensed if written for a patient enrolled in a clinical trial by an authorized investigator.”

 

They based their ban on an improper statement issued by FDA, which is controlled by opponents of Trump’s reelection. Of course, many government officials in Oregon are against Trump, too.

 

Every state board of pharmacy or medicine is controlled by left-leaning government workers who, by and large, despise President Trump and hope he loses in November. They are accomplishing their dream by choking off public access to HCQ.

 

In other countries, such as Costa Rica and Honduras, HCQ is being given freely to the public to successfully defeat coronavirus there. In some countries officials are even going door-to-door distributing HCQ to build up protection against the virus, with great success.

 

The mortality rate from COVID-19 in the United States is far higher per case, and per million of residents, despite how we have the finest hospital system in the world. We don’t currently have public access to HCQ to protect against the disease, however, and that is what is needed at this time.

 

An executive order by President Trump, through use of his full emergency authority, could give Americans the same rights to HCQ for COVID which some of the poorest people in the world enjoy. Trump could even dispense HCQ at his rallies, which would both restore their massive numbers and help safeguard against spread of the virus.

 

But the medical establishment, such as Dr. John Fleming who is advising Trump’s Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, is impeding this solution to the crisis. As a physician, Dr. Fleming is instinctively trained to oppose OTC status for most medications, and he is beholden to the mindset of requiring people to see physicians first.

 

Americans are accustomed to being advised to consult a physician before starting a weight-loss plan, an attorney before writing a will, and an accountant before filing a tax return. In ideal situations, recommending use of a professional is non-controversial.

 

When there is a crisis, however, the dynamic is different. When thousands are dying unnecessarily, and millions are paralyzed by fear, directly alleviating that mortality and fear becomes paramount.

 

There is no valid reason to deny public access to low-dose HCQ, which studies show can protect against COVID, just as there is no legitimate reason to require a prescription for low-dose steroid cream (Cortisone) and many other over-the-counter medications. The political motivation to block access to HCQ justifies making it publicly available.

 

This is not a decision for Anthony Fauci or the medical establishment or FDA to make during a national crisis. This is for President Trump to decide, and make HCQ available quickly to the public.

 

If an intruder is discovered in one’s home in the middle of the night, no responsible father tries first to call an expert to get an opinion about what to do. Instead, quick and decisive action is taken, and that means OTC status for HCQ to conquer COVID.

 

John and Andy Schlafly are sons of Phyllis Schlafly (1924-2016) and lead the continuing Phyllis Schlafly Eagles organizations with writing and policy work.

Truth Seeker ID: 0b8c6f July 15, 2020, 6:31 p.m. No.2686   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/9974504

 

Cloth masks: Dangerous to your health?

Date: April 22, 2015

 

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150422121724.htm

 

Summary:

 

Respiratory infection is much higher among healthcare workers wearing cloth masks compared to medical masks, research shows. Cloth masks should not be used by workers in any healthcare setting, authors of the new study say.

 

The widespread use of cloth masks by healthcare workers may actually put them at increased risk of respiratory illness and viral infections and their global use should be discouraged, according to a UNSW study.

 

The results of the first randomized clinical trial (RCT) to study the efficacy of cloth masks were published in the journal BMJ Open.

 

The trial saw 1607 hospital healthcare workers across 14 hospitals in the Vietnamese capital, Hanoi, split into three groups: those wearing medical masks, those wearing cloth masks and a control group based on usual practice, which included mask wearing.

 

Workers used the mask on every shift for four consecutive weeks.

 

The study found respiratory infection was much higher among healthcare workers wearing cloth masks.

 

The penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% compared to medical masks with 44%.

 

Professor Raina MacIntyre, lead study author and head of UNSW's School of Public Health and Community Medicine, said the results of the study caution against the use of cloth masks.

 

"Masks are worn to protect from infection during pandemics and outbreaks, especially when there are no drugs or vaccines available for protection," Professor MacIntyre said.

 

"Masks are especially important for frontline doctors and nurses, as their protection from infection is key to maintaining the ability to tackle a pandemic effectively.

 

"We should be cautious about cloth mask use in healthcare settings, particularly high-risk situations such as emergency departments, intensive care, paediatric or respiratory wards."

 

Cloth masks remain widely used globally because they are a cheaper option especially in areas where there are shortages of protective equipment, including in Asian countries, which have historically been affected by emerging infectious diseases, as well as in West Africa, which was the epicentre of the recent Ebola epidemic.

 

The authors speculate that the cloth masks' moisture retention, their reuse and poor filtration may explain the increased risk of infection.

 

Professor MacIntyre, who has completed the largest body of clincial trial research on respiratory protection in health workers internationally, said emerging infectious diseases are not constrained within geographical borders.

 

"Effective controls of outbreaks and pandemics at the origin impacts us directly, so it is important for global disease control that the use of cloth masks be discouraged in high-risk situations," she said.

 

"Despite more than half the world using cloth masks, global disease control guidelines, including those from the World Health Organisation, fail to clearly specify conditions of their use.

 

"These guidelines need to be updated to reflect the higher infection risk posed by cloth masks, as found in our study."

 

Professor MacIntyre said the study's results pointed to the effectiveness of medical masks, in addition to the harm caused by cloth masks.

 

"Additional research is urgently needed to build on our study's findings."

 

The trial was a collaboration between researchers in Australia and the National Institute for Hygiene and Epidemiology in Vietnam and was funded by an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant.

 

A separate expert review by Professor MacIntyre published in the British Medical Journal earlier this month found that the lack of research on facemasks and respirators is reflected in varied and sometimes conflicting global policies and guidelines.

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 16, 2020, 5:25 p.m. No.2715   🗄️.is 🔗kun

An antibody (antigen) versus a virus test is a major difference.

 

https://twitter.com/steveeagar/status/1283575782175014916

Truth Seeker ID: e8c48e July 16, 2020, 5:56 p.m. No.2717   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2718

HCQ inhibits HIV?

 

2003:

Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today’s diseases

Effects on HIV infection, Anti-HIV effects of chloroquine

"The anti-HIV activity of chloroquine has been shown not only in cell line models, but also in peripheral blood lymphocytes and monocytes —ie, cell culture models in which cellular uptake of chloroquine is closer to the conditions occurring in vivo. Under these conditions, it was possible to obtain levels of inhibition of viral replication above 90%."

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00806-5

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(03)00806-5/fulltext

https://archive.vn/cTZGM

 

''(I found a bunch of HCQ <HIV studies)''

1996:

Inhibition of HIV-1 replication by hydroxychloroquine: mechanism of action and comparison with zidovudine

"HCQ suppressed HIV-1 replication in a dose-dependent manner in both recently and chronically infected T-cell and monocytic cell lines."

https://www.clinicaltherapeutics.com/article/S0149-2918(96)80063-4/fulltext

https://archive.vn/LK3QV

 

1993:

Inhibition of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Replication by Hydroxychloroquine in T Cells and Monocytes

"These data suggest that HCQ may be useful adjunctive therapy in the treatment of HIV-1 infection."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8427717/?dopt=Abstract

https://archive.vn/06fWY

 

1995:

Hydroxychloroquine Treatment of Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

"The amount of recoverable HIV-1 RNA in plasma declined significantly in the HCQ group over the 8-week period (P = 0.022), while it increased in the placebo group."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8565026/?dopt=Abstract

https://archive.vn/18UXF

https://archive.vn/M8iZr

 

1996:

The Antiinflammatory and Antiviral Effects of Hydroxychloroquine in Two Patients With Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and Active Inflammatory Arthritis

"HCQ may exert simultaneous anti-inflammatory and antiviral effects in patients with HIV infection and inflammatory arthritis. If larger studies confirm this observation, it may be the drug of choice in this population of patients."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8546725/?dopt=Abstract

https://archive.vn/Dyfy0

 

2004:

Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine as Inhibitors of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1) Activity

"Chloroquine and its analog hydroxychloroquine are two inexpensive agents that are widely used for the treatment of malaria and have been shown to achieve some level of anti-HIV activity."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15320751/

https://archive.vn/AskWC

 

2001:

The anti-HIV-1 activity of chloroquine.

"Interestingly, CQ is capable of inhibiting HIV-1 replication at concentrations within the range reported in plasma of individuals chronically treated with doses of the drug which have well-known and limited toxicity."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11166661/

https://archive.vn/aXgYF

 

2002:

Hydroxychloroquine, hydroxycarbamide, and didanosine as economic treatment for HIV-1

"This new combination of drugs could be suitable for countries that have restricted resources"

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12020529/

https://archive.vn/Ne1jY

 

2005:

Hydroxychloroquine, hydroxyurea and didanosine as initial therapy for HIV-infected patients with low viral load: safety, efficacy and resistance profile after 144 weeks

"This novel and well-tolerated combination controls viral replication during long-term follow up, with development of few resistance mutations. With careful monitoring it may be a useful strategy for delaying highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and associated toxicity in selected patients with low initial viral loads."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15670247/

https://archive.vn/76fxQ

 

Small sampling of studies

Imagine if HCQ was widely prescribed and suddenly HIV positive people began testing HIV negative.

Truth Seeker ID: 0fc600 July 17, 2020, 7:29 a.m. No.2721   🗄️.is 🔗kun

From >>>/qresearch/9984236

Writer is evidently a med anon

 

Good run down and thankQ for posting it… (in regard to article >>2709 Op-Ed)

 

-No universal standardized testing used in all 50 states, so the actual numbers will never be known.

-No universal standardized mandatory autopsies in all 50 states, so the actual number of deaths due to covid 19 will never be known.

-Flu & all types of pneumonia were lumped in covid deaths, no standard mandatory autopsies were required to rule out other causes of death. (financial incentives to list covid on death certificates, for ventilators and positive covid patients tests/labs/hospitalizations.

Types of pneumonia lumped in with covid:

Bacterial pneumonia, Hospital Acquired pneumonia, pulmonary edema (congestive heart failure patients), Aspiration pneumonitis and pneumonia are caused by inhaling toxic substances, Chemical pneumonitis, Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Yes, that's right baby! Non-sterile/clean ventilators/moisture accumulation will cause pneumonia, Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Patients.

Fungal Pneumonia.

Organ or bone marrow transplantation recipients with bilateral interstitial pneumonia.

Patients with HIV infection become vulnerable to P. jirovecii pneumonia.

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.

Respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia.

Metapneumovirus associated pneumonia.

Parainfluenza viruse/viruses associated pneumonia.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Heart failure organizing pneumonia,

Misdiagnosised pulmonary embolism, pulmonary edema, pulmonary hemorrhage, etc. etc. etc.,plus others that are misdiagnosed.

 

-Do the math…there were 80,000 flu deaths in 2018 according to the CDC, they even list 79,000 on their twitter page back in Nov. 2018. How ironic that years of charting the flu, 2019-2020 flu deaths stopped miraculously and the lowest # of deaths in decades…it's a miracle! NO they lumped them all together and you can clearly find that on the multiple inaccurate data on the CDC's web sites.

This is according to the CDC. The COVID-19 hospitalization rates are “similar to” those in the 65 and older category during “recent high severity influenza seasons.”

-Contaminated tests, per CDC.

-False positive tests per CDC, for a common cold.

-Dem. Governors & Mayor either knowingly forced or put covid 19 positive patients in with the elderly at nursing homes & assisted living facilities, when it was publicized back in March that they were the most vulnerable to the virus and most likely to die from it.

-Dem. Govs, Dem. Mayors restricted medications that they could prescribe to their patients even if they were successful in other countries, CDC own guidelines promoted more profitable medication along with the fabricated side-effects & wrong dosage amounts by the fearmongering main stream media and social media.

-Complete censorship and removal of life saving medications, studies and physician's own successful experiences, pressures from the WHO dictating opposite death cert diagnosis codes, and accounts that fabricated the numbers.

–Positive antibodies for covid were lumped in with positive covid numbers. A huge no, no! That would be like counting adults that still tested positive for the chicken pox as new cases of the chicken pox…

Truth Seeker ID: 0fc600 July 17, 2020, 7:41 a.m. No.2722   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/9986642

 

>BREAKING: Sources inside Trump Administration confirm to me that CDC has been misreporting the data for coronavirus to inflate thae numbers.

>https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1284104344225423361?s=20

Truth Seeker ID: be3217 July 17, 2020, 3:57 p.m. No.2738   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/9989171

>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/breaking-report-health-officials-numerous-states-mistakenly-included-positive-results-antibody-tests-reporting-new-covid-19-cases-cdc/

 

>>>/qresearch/9989783

>https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1284104344225423361

 

Imagine that.

>>2174 OP-Ed General #1

 

Health Officials in Numerous States ‘Mistakenly’ Included Positive Results From Antibody Tests When Reporting New COVID-19 Cases to CDC

 

Health officials from numerous states have ‘mistakenly’ included positive results from antibody tests when reporting new Coronavirus cases to the CDC, ultimately inflating new cases.

 

The Trump administration announced new guidelines on Wednesday. Starting this week hospitals will be ordered to bypass the CDC and send ALL COVID-19 patient information to a central database in Washington DC.

 

This comes after TGP’s Tuesday report on the likely fraudulent numbers coming from the CDC.

 

FOX 35 Orlando investigated and found out that countless labs were reporting 100% COVID positivity rates.

 

Most Florida labs have not reported any negative test result data to the state!

 

For example, one lab in Orlando, Centra Care, reported that 83 people were tested for COVID and ALL tested positive — this is IMPOSSIBLE!

 

On Friday, it was revealed that once again, the country’s positivity rate is skewed because positive antibody tests are being lumped in with viral tests for COVID-19.

 

Fox News contributor and physician Nicole Saphier reported: Health officials from numerous states have mistakenly included positive results from antibody tests when reporting new COVID-19 cases to the CDC, grossly inflating new cases. The scientific equivalent to “double dipping.”

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/breaking-report-health-officials-numerous-states-mistakenly-included-positive-results-antibody-tests-reporting-new-covid-19-cases-cdc/

Truth Seeker ID: be3217 July 17, 2020, 5:07 p.m. No.2746   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/9992683

If wearing a mask is a medical issue, then advising someone to wear a mask when you are not a licensed physician and aware of the person's pertinent medical history amounts to felony practice of medicine without a license.

 

says a lawfag

Truth Seeker ID: be3217 July 18, 2020, 5:25 a.m. No.2759   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/9997038

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/

 

Jun 27, 2020

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose

 

by Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter

 

Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify “positive” patients, whereby “positive” is usually equated with “infected.”

 

But looking closely at the facts, the conclusion is that these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2.

Unfounded “Test, test, test,…” mantra

 

At the media briefing on COVID-19 on March 16, 2020, the WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said:

 

We have a simple message for all countries: test, test, test.”

 

The message was spread through headlines around the world, for instance by Reuters and the BBC.

 

Still on the 3 of May, the moderator of the heute journal — one of the most important news magazines on German television— was passing the mantra of the corona dogma on to his audience with the admonishing words:

 

Test, test, test—that is the credo at the moment, and it is the only way to really understand how much the coronavirus is spreading.”

 

This indicates that the belief in the validity of the PCR tests is so strong that it equals a religion that tolerates virtually no contradiction.

 

But it is well known that religions are about faith and not about scientific facts. And as Walter Lippmann, the two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and perhaps the most influential journalist of the 20th century said: “Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.”

 

So to start, it is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology, did not think alike. His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993.

 

Unfortunately, Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74, but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection.

 

The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.

 

How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.

Lack of a valid gold standard

 

Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with.

 

This is a fundamental point. Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity”[1] and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available.

 

As an example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?”:

 

If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”

 

Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University confirms this. In her paper “Interpreting a COVID-19 test result”, published recently in The British Medical Journal, she writes that there is a “lack of such a clear-cut ‘gold-standard’ for COVID-19 testing.”

 

But instead of classifying the tests as unsuitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnosis, or instead of pointing out that only a virus, proven through isolation and purification, can be a solid gold standard, Watson claims in all seriousness that, “pragmatically” COVID-19 diagnosis itself, remarkably including PCR testing itself, “may be the best available ‘gold standard’.” But this is not scientifically sound.

 

Apart from the fact that it is downright absurd to take the PCR test itself as part of the gold standard to evaluate the PCR test, there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, as even people such as Thomas Löscher, former head of the Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine at the University of Munich and member of the Federal Association of German Internists, conceded to us[2].

 

And if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, COVID-19 diagnosis — contrary to Watson’s statement — cannot be suitable for serving as a valid gold standard.

 

In addition, “experts” such as Watson overlook the fact that only virus isolation, i.e. an unequivocal virus proof, can be the gold standard.

 

That is why I asked Watson how COVID-19 diagnosis “may be the best available gold standard,” if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, and also whether the virus itself, that is virus isolation, wouldn’t be the best available/possible gold standard. But she hasn’t answered these questions yet – despite multiple requests. And she has not yet responded to our rapid response post on her article in which we address exactly the same points, either, though she wrote us on June 2nd: “I will try to post a reply later this week when I have a chance.”

No proof for the RNA being of viral origin

 

Now the question is: What is required first for virus isolation/proof? We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from.

 

As textbooks (e.g., White/Fenner. Medical Virology, 1986, p. 9) as well as leading virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic Dwyer state, particle purification — i.e. the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object, as for instance Nobel laureate Marie Curie purified 100 mg of radium chloride in 1898 by extracting it from tons of pitchblende — is an essential pre-requisite for proving the existence of a virus, and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus.

 

The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand.

 

And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed.

 

Hence, we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses.

 

But not a single team could answer that question with “yes” — and NB., nobody said purification was not a necessary step. We only got answers like “No, we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” (see below).

 

We asked several study authors “Do your electron micrographs show the purified virus?”, they gave the following responses:

 

Study 1: Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris. “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health” Nature Medicine, March 2020

Replying Author: Malik Peiris

Date: May 12, 2020

Answer: “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.”

 

Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19”, Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, February 2020

Replying Author: Myung-Guk Han

Date: May 6, 2020

Answer: “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.”

 

Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al. “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea”, Journal of Korean Medical Science, February 24, 2020

Replying Author: Wan Beom Park

Date: March 19, 2020

Answer: “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”

 

Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China”, 2019, New England Journal of Medicine, February 20, 2020

Replying Author: Wenjie Tan

Date: March 18, 2020

Answer: “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”

 

Regarding the mentioned papers it is clear that what is shown in the electron micrographs (EMs) is the end result of the experiment, meaning there is no other result that they could have made EMs from.

 

That is to say, if the authors of these studies concede that their published EMs do not show purified particles, then they definitely do not possess purified particles claimed to be viral. (In this context, it has to be remarked that some researchers use the term “isolation” in their papers, but the procedures described therein do not represent a proper isolation (purification) process. Consequently, in this context the term “isolation” is misused).

 

Thus, the authors of four of the principal, early 2020 papers claiming discovery of a new coronavirus concede they had no proof that the origin of the virus genome was viral-like particles or cellular debris, pure or impure, or particles of any kind. In other words, the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.

 

We have also contacted Dr Charles Calisher, who is a seasoned virologist. In 2001, Science published an “impassioned plea…to the younger generation” from several veteran virologists, among them Calisher, saying that:

 

[modern virus detection methods like] sleek polymerase chain reaction […] tell little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, [or] how it makes people sick. [It is] like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint.”[3]

 

And that’s why we asked Dr Calisher whether he knows one single paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finally really purified. His answer:

 

I know of no such a publication. I have kept an eye out for one.”[4]

 

This actually means that one cannot conclude that the RNA gene sequences, which the scientists took from the tissue samples prepared in the mentioned in vitro trials and for which the PCR tests are finally being “calibrated,” belong to a specific virus — in this case SARS-CoV-2.

 

In addition, there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.

 

In order to establish a causal connection, one way or the other, i.e. beyond virus isolation and purification, it would have been absolutely necessary to carry out an experiment that satisfies the four Koch’s postulates. But there is no such experiment, as Amory Devereux and Rosemary Frei recently revealed for OffGuardian.

 

The necessity to fulfill these postulates regarding SARS-CoV-2 is demonstrated not least by the fact that attempts have been made to fulfill them. But even researchers claiming they have done it, in reality, did not succeed.

 

One example is a study published in Nature on May 7. This trial, besides other procedures which render the study invalid, did not meet any of the postulates.

 

For instance, the alleged “infected” laboratory mice did not show any relevant clinical symptoms clearly attributable to pneumonia, which according to the third postulate should actually occur if a dangerous and potentially deadly virus was really at work there. And the slight bristles and weight loss, which were observed temporarily in the animals are negligible, not only because they could have been caused by the procedure itself, but also because the weight went back to normal again.

 

Also, no animal died except those they killed to perform the autopsies. And let’s not forget: These experiments should have been done before developing a test, which is not the case.

 

Revealingly, none of the leading German representatives of the official theory about SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 — the Robert Koch-Institute (RKI), Alexander S. Kekulé (University of Halle), Hartmut Hengel and Ralf Bartenschlager (German Society for Virology), the aforementioned Thomas Löscher, Ulrich Dirnagl (Charité Berlin) or Georg Bornkamm (virologist and professor emeritus at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Munich) — could answer the following question I have sent them:

 

If the particles that are claimed to be to be SARS-CoV-2 have not been purified, how do you want to be sure that the RNA gene sequences of these particles belong to a specific new virus?

 

Particularly, if there are studies showing that substances such as antibiotics that are added to the test tubes in the in vitro experiments carried out for virus detection can “stress” the cell culture in a way that new gene sequences are being formed that were not previously detectable — an aspect that Nobel laureate Barbara McClintock already drew attention to in her Nobel Lecture back in 1983.

 

It should not go unmentioned that we finally got the Charité – the employer of Christian Drosten, Germany’s most influential virologist in respect of COVID-19, advisor to the German government and co-developer of the PCR test which was the first to be “accepted” (not validated!) by the WHO worldwide – to answer questions on the topic.

 

But we didn’t get answers until June 18, 2020, after months of non-response. In the end, we achieved it only with the help of Berlin lawyer Viviane Fischer.

 

Regarding our question “Has the Charité convinced itself that appropriate particle purification was carried out?,” the Charité concedes that they didn’t use purified particles.

 

And although they claim “virologists at the Charité are sure that they are testing for the virus,” in their paper (Corman et al.) they state:

 

RNA was extracted from clinical samples with the MagNA Pure 96 system (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) and from cell culture supernatants with the viral RNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany),”

 

Which means they just assumed the RNA was viral.

 

Incidentally, the Corman et al. paper, published on January 23, 2020 didn’t even go through a proper peer review process, nor were the procedures outlined therein accompanied by controls — although it is only through these two things that scientific work becomes really solid.

Irrational test results

 

It is also certain that we cannot know the false positive rate of the PCR tests without widespread testing of people who certainly do not have the virus, proven by a method which is independent of the test (having a solid gold standard).

 

Therefore, it is hardly surprising that there are several papers illustrating irrational test results.

 

For example, already in February the health authority in China’s Guangdong province reported that people have fully recovered from illness blamed on COVID-19, started to test “negative,” and then tested “positive” again.

 

A month later, a paper published in the Journal of Medical Virology showed that 29 out of 610 patients at a hospital in Wuhan had 3 to 6 test results that flipped between “negative”, “positive” and “dubious”.

 

A third example is a study from Singapore in which tests were carried out almost daily on 18 patients and the majority went from “positive” to “negative” back to “positive” at least once, and up to five times in one patient.

 

Even Wang Chen, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, conceded in February that the PCR tests are “only 30 to 50 per cent accurate”; while Sin Hang Lee from the Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory sent a letter to the WHO’s coronavirus response team and to Anthony S. Fauci on March 22, 2020, saying that:

 

It has been widely reported in the social media that the RT-qPCR [Reverse Transcriptase quantitative PCR] test kits used to detect SARSCoV-2 RNA in human specimens are generating many false positive results and are not sensitive enough to detect some real positive cases.”

 

In other words, even if we theoretically assume that these PCR tests can really detect a viral infection, the tests would be practically worthless, and would only cause an unfounded scare among the “positive” people tested.

 

This becomes also evident considering the positive predictive value (PPV).

 

The PPV indicates the probability that a person with a positive test result is truly “positive” (ie. has the supposed virus), and it depends on two factors: the prevalence of the virus in the general population and the specificity of the test, that is the percentage of people without disease in whom the test is correctly “negative” (a test with a specificity of 95% incorrectly gives a positive result in 5 out of 100 non-infected people).

 

With the same specificity, the higher the prevalence, the higher the PPV.

 

In this context, on June 12 2020, the journal Deutsches Ärzteblatt published an article in which the PPV has been calculated with three different prevalence scenarios.

 

The results must, of course, be viewed very critically, first because it is not possible to calculate the specificity without a solid gold standard, as outlined, and second because the calculations in the article are based on the specificity determined in the study by Jessica Watson, which is potentially worthless, as also mentioned.

 

But if you abstract from it, assuming that the underlying specificity of 95% is correct and that we know the prevalence, even the mainstream medical journal Deutsches Ärzteblatt reports that the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests may have “a shockingly low” PPV.

 

In one of the three scenarios, figuring with an assumed prevalence of 3%, the PPV was only 30 percent, which means that 70 percent of the people tested “positive” are not “positive” at all. Yet “they are prescribed quarantine,” as even the Ärzteblatt notes critically.

 

In a second scenario of the journal’s article, a prevalence of rate of 20 percent is assumed. In this case they generate a PPV of 78 percent, meaning that 22 percent of the “positive” tests are false “positives.”

 

That would mean: If we take the around 9 million people who are currently considered “positive” worldwide — supposing that the true “positives” really have a viral infection — we would get almost 2 million false “positives.”

 

All this fits with the fact that the CDC and the FDA, for instance, concede in their files that the so-called “SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests” are not suitable for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis.

 

In the “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel“ file from March 30, 2020, for example, it says:

 

Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms”

 

And:

 

This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”

 

And the FDA admits that:

 

positive results […] do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”

 

Remarkably, in the instruction manuals of PCR tests we can also read that they are not intended as a diagnostic test, as for instance in those by Altona Diagnostics and Creative Diagnostics[5].

 

To quote another one, in the product announcement of the LightMix Modular Assays produced by TIB Molbiol — which were developed using the Corman et al. protocol — and distributed by Roche we can read:

 

These assays are not intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of coronavirus infection”

 

And:

 

For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.”

 

Where is the evidence that the tests can measure the “viral load”?

 

There is also reason to conclude that the PCR test from Roche and others cannot even detect the targeted genes.

 

Moreover, in the product descriptions of the RT-qPCR tests for SARS-COV-2 it says they are “qualitative” tests, contrary to the fact that the “q” in “qPCR” stands for “quantitative.” And if these tests are not “quantitative” tests, they don’t show how many viral particles are in the body.

 

That is crucial because, in order to even begin talking about actual illness in the real world not only in a laboratory, the patient would need to have millions and millions of viral particles actively replicating in their body.

 

That is to say, the CDC, the WHO, the FDA or the RKI may assert that the tests can measure the so-called “viral load,” i.e. how many viral particles are in the body. “But this has never been proven. That is an enormous scandal,” as the journalist Jon Rappoport points out.

 

This is not only because the term “viral load” is deception. If you put the question “what is viral load?” at a dinner party, people take it to mean viruses circulating in the bloodstream. They’re surprised to learn it’s actually RNA molecules.

 

Also, to prove beyond any doubt that the PCR can measure how much a person is “burdened” with a disease-causing virus, the following experiment would have had to be carried out (which has not yet happened):

 

You take, let’s say, a few hundred or even thousand people and remove tissue samples from them. Make sure the people who take the samples do not perform the test.The testers will never know who the patients are and what condition they’re in. The testers run their PCR on the tissue samples. In each case, they say which virus they found and how much of it they found. Then, for example, in patients 29, 86, 199, 272, and 293 they found a great deal of what they claim is a virus. Now we un-blind those patients. They should all be sick, because they have so much virus replicating in their bodies. But are they really sick — or are they fit as a fiddle?

 

With the help of the aforementioned lawyer Viviane Fischer, I finally got the Charité to also answer the question of whether the test developed by Corman et al. — the so-called “Drosten PCR test” — is a quantitative test.

 

But the Charité was not willing to answer this question “yes”. Instead, the Charité wrote:

 

If real-time RT-PCR is involved, to the knowledge of the Charité in most cases these are […] limited to qualitative detection.”

 

Furthermore, the “Drosten PCR test” uses the unspecific E-gene assay as preliminary assay, while the Institut Pasteur uses the same assay as confirmatory assay.

 

According to Corman et al., the E-gene assay is likely to detect all Asian viruses, while the other assays in both tests are supposed to be more specific for sequences labelled “SARS-CoV-2”.

 

Besides the questionable purpose of having either a preliminary or a confirmatory test that is likely to detect all Asian viruses, at the beginning of April the WHO changed the algorithm, recommending that from then on a test can be regarded as “positive” even if just the E-gene assay (which is likely to detect all Asian viruses!) gives a “positive” result.

 

This means that a confirmed unspecific test result is officially sold as specific.

 

That change of algorithm increased the “case” numbers. Tests using the E-gene assay are produced for example by Roche, TIB Molbiol and R-Biopharm.

High Cq values make the test results even more meaningless

 

Another essential problem is that many PCR tests have a “cycle quantification” (Cq) value of over 35, and some, including the “Drosten PCR test”, even have a Cq of 45.

 

The Cq value specifies how many cycles of DNA replication are required to detect a real signal from biological samples.

 

“Cq values higher than 40 are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported,” as it says in the MIQE guidelines.

 

MIQE stands for “Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments”, a set of guidelines that describe the minimum information necessary for evaluating publications on Real-Time PCR, also called quantitative PCR, or qPCR.

 

The inventor himself, Kary Mullis, agreed, when he stated:

 

If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.”

 

The MIQE guidelines have been developed under the aegis of Stephen A. Bustin, Professor of Molecular Medicine, a world-renowned expert on quantitative PCR and author of the book A-Z of Quantitative PCR which has been called “the bible of qPCR.”

 

In a recent podcast interview Bustin points out that “the use of such arbitrary Cq cut-offs is not ideal, because they may be either too low (eliminating valid results) or too high (increasing false “positive” results).”

 

And, according to him, a Cq in the 20s to 30s should be aimed at and there is concern regarding the reliability of the results for any Cq over 35.

 

If the Cq value gets too high, it becomes difficult to distinguish real signal from background, for example due to reactions of primers and fluorescent probes, and hence there is a higher probability of false positives.

 

Moreover, among other factors that can alter the result, before starting with the actual PCR, in case you are looking for presumed RNA viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, the RNA must be converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) with the enzyme Reverse Transcriptase—hence the “RT” at the beginning of “PCR” or “qPCR.”

 

But this transformation process is “widely recognized as inefficient and variable,” as Jessica Schwaber from the Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine in Toronto and two research colleagues pointed out in a 2019 paper.

 

Stephen A. Bustin acknowledges problems with PCR in a comparable way.

 

For example, he pointed to the problem that in the course of the conversion process (RNA to cDNA) the amount of DNA obtained with the same RNA base material can vary widely, even by a factor of 10 (see above interview).

 

Considering that the DNA sequences get doubled at every cycle, even a slight variation becomes magnified and can thus alter the result, annihilating the test’s reliable informative value.

 

So how can it be that those who claim the PCR tests are highly meaningful for so-called COVID-19 diagnosis blind out the fundamental inadequacies of these tests—even if they are confronted with questions regarding their validity?

 

Certainly, the apologists of the novel coronavirus hypothesis should have dealt with these questions before throwing the tests on the market and putting basically the whole world under lockdown, not least because these are questions that come to mind immediately for anyone with even a spark of scientific understanding.

 

Thus, the thought inevitably emerges that financial and political interests play a decisive role for this ignorance about scientific obligations. NB, the WHO, for example has financial ties with drug companies, as the British Medical Journal showed in 2010.

 

And experts criticize “that the notorious corruption and conflicts of interest at WHO have continued, even grown“ since then. The CDC as well, to take another big player, is obviously no better off.

 

Finally, the reasons and possible motives remain speculative, and many involved surely act in good faith; but the science is clear: The numbers generated by these RT-PCR tests do not in the least justify frightening people who have been tested “positive” and imposing lockdown measures that plunge countless people into poverty and despair or even drive them to suicide.

 

And a “positive” result may have serious consequences for the patients as well, because then all non-viral factors are excluded from the diagnosis and the patients are treated with highly toxic drugs and invasive intubations. Especially for elderly people and patients with pre-existing conditions such a treatment can be fatal, as we have outlined in the article “Fatal Therapie.”

 

Without doubt eventual excess mortality rates are caused by the therapy and by the lockdown measures, while the “COVID-19” death statistics comprise also patients who died of a variety of diseases, redefined as COVID-19 only because of a “positive” test result whose value could not be more doubtful.

 

NOTES:-

 

[1] Sensitivity is defined as the proportion of patients with disease in whom the test is positive; and specificity is defined as the proportion of patients without disease in whom the test is negative.

 

[2] E-mail from Prof. Thomas Löscher from March 6, 2020

 

[3] Martin Enserink. Virology. Old guard urges virologists to go back to basics, Science, July 6, 2001, p. 24

 

[4] E-mail from Charles Calisher from May 10, 2020

 

[5] Creative Diagnostics, SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit

Torsten Engelbrecht is an award-winning journalist and author from Hamburg, Germany. In 2006 he co-authored Virus-Mania with Dr Klaus Kohnlein, and in 2009 he won the German Alternate Media Award. He has also written for Rubikon, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Financial Times Deutschland and many others.

Konstantin Demeter is a freelance photographer and an independent researcher. Together with the journalist Torsten Engelbrecht he has published articles on the “COVID-19” crisis in the online magazine Rubikon, as well as contributions on the monetary system, geopolitics, and the media in Swiss Italian newspapers.

Truth Seeker ID: e7791a July 18, 2020, 6:36 p.m. No.2803   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2089

 

Moderna coronavirus vaccine causes side effects in over 50% of patients; antibodies disappear in 2-3 months, rendering the vaccine pointless

 

07/16/2020 / By Mike Adams

 

The widely-hyped Moderna coronavirus vaccine caused adverse events (side effects) in over 50% of clinical trial participants, including, “fatigue, chills, headache, myalgia, and pain at the injection site.” While it generates antibodies in the short term, new studies indicate those antibodies fade very quickly, rendering the vaccine pointless in the face of the coronavirus pandemic.

 

The side effects of the Moderna mRNA vaccine are documented in a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, a discredited, pro-pharma junk science rag that lies in favor of Big Pharma in every way possible. As published on Medicine.news, the NEJM was recently caught up with The Lancet in a junk science scheme that sought to discredit hydroxychloroquine through the use of fabricated data that was published in both journals (then was later retracted).

 

The new study is entitled, “An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report.” It details the astonishing degree of side effects experienced by study subjects, revealing that over half of study participants reported at least one side effect. This chart, from the study, also shows that the side effects are dose dependent, meaning the higher the injection dose, the higher the reported side effects, further strengthening the causal ties between the vaccine and the side effects:

 

As you can see from the chart, 100% of study participants experienced side effects at the 100 ug or 250 ug injection volumes, during the second round of vaccination. 100% of study participants experienced side effects in the high-dose second round of vaccination

Notably, 100% of participants experienced headaches, local symptoms and systemic symptoms, while nearly 100% experienced chills, myalgia and fatigue, during the second injections. This study reveals that the vaccine becomes increasingly toxic with subsequent injections, meaning even if the fist injection is relatively well handled by the body, the second injection can be significantly more dangerous.

 

Notably, with other studies now revealing that coronavirus antibodies fade quickly over the period of about 3 months, the mRNA vaccine from Moderna would have to be injected multiple times, perhaps as many as four times each year in order to maintain high levels of antibodies. But with each injection, the vaccine becomes more toxic and produces more side effects. As the study authors conclude, “Systemic adverse events were more common after the second vaccination, particularly with the highest dose…”

 

Even with side effects impacting all participants in the second round, study authors claim everything’s fine

Yet, to no one’s surprise, all these toxic effects of the vaccine that increase with subsequent vaccines are not called out as an item of concern. Given that the study authors are, of course, paid by Moderna to produce pro-vaccine propaganda in the name of “science,” they conclude that all the side effects are perfectly fine, stating: (emphasis added)

 

Across both vaccinations, solicited systemic and local adverse events that occurred in more than half the participants included fatigue, chills, headache, myalgia, and pain at the injection site. Evaluation of safety clinical laboratory values of grade 2 or higher and unsolicited adverse events revealed no patterns of concern… These safety and immunogenicity findings support advancement of the mRNA-1273 vaccine to later-stage clinical trials.

 

Got that? The vaccine is increasingly toxic in higher doses and multiple injections, but it’s still awesome and should move toward production and widespread injections into potentially billions of human beings, despite no long-term safety studies being conducted whatsoever. That’s the vaccine industry in 2020: Screw safety and science, just approve the damn thing and collect the hundreds of billions of dollars from governments buying your vaccine, even if it harms or kills millions of people.

 

Even when the vaccine invokes an antibody response, that’s not “immunity”

Note that the production of antibodies in the blood is not the same as “functional immunity.” There is zero evidence that this vaccine makes anyone immune to coronavirus infections.

 

read more …

 

Full Article:

http://medicine.news/2020-07-16-moderna-coronavirus-vaccine-causes-side-effects-antibodies-fade.html

 

Referenced NEJM Article:

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 18, 2020, 8:29 p.m. No.2812   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10005630

 

>Time to [UnMask]: Conclusion Masks Don't Work

 

>Mask facts:

 

>One Stop: A compilation and summary of official reports:

 

>Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

 

>https://aapsonline.org/mask-facts/

 

>“Advice to decision makers on the use of masks for healthy people in community settings

 

>As described above, the wide use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not supported by current evidence and carries uncertainties and critical risks.”

 

>Medical masks offered no protection at all from influenza.

 

>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00198.x?fbclid=IwAR3kRYVYDKb0aR-su9_me9_vY6a8KVR4HZ17J2A_80f_fXUABRQdhQlc8Wo

 

>https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/t0131-2019-novel-coronavirus.html

 

>https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/infectioncontrol/maskguidance.htm

 

>https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331693/WHO-2019-nCov-IPC_Masks-2020.3-eng.pdf

 

>Bottom Line"

 

>1- A COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) particle is 0.125 micrometers (μm); influenza virus size is 0.08 – 0.12 μm

 

>2- N95 – A properly fitted N95 will block 95% of tiny air particles down to 0.3 μm from reaching the wearer’s face.

 

>A N95 mask block most particle .30 micrometer, a covid19 particle is .125

 

>Thanks to Dave:

 

>https://twitter.com/X22Report/status/1284477612581150720

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 18, 2020, 8:32 p.m. No.2813   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10005633

>>>/qresearch/10005589

Under Attack: California Governor SATANIC Newsom Bans ALL In-Home Bible Fellowship, Church Services, Meetings, Singing, and Church Gatherings - Evil MF!!!

 

>https://brownsjournal.com/faith/california-governor-newsom-bans-all-in-home-bible-fellowship-church-services-meetings-singing-and-church-gatherings/

Cee ID: 0fc600 July 19, 2020, 8:37 a.m. No.2855   🗄️.is 🔗kun

copied over from Welcome #3

 

>>2848

>Masks Don't work - links from live search and post on twatter July 16th

 

>Short on time dropping here

 

>–

 

>https://metro.co.uk/2020/02/27/protect-coronavirus-dont-wear-face-masks-12312127/

 

>https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/masks-dont-work

 

>https://ho1.us/2020/05/masks-dont-work/

 

>https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8199959/Face-masks-NOT-stop-healthy-people-catching-coronavirus-says.html

 

>http://archive.vn/zA3eb

 

>>2849

>>>2848

 

>Just in from the WSJ.

 

>https://www.wsj.com/articles/face-masks-really-do-matter-the-scientific-evidence-is-growing-11595083298

 

>▶Truth Seeker 07/19/20 (Sun) 09:33:05 338669 (2) No.2852

 

>>>2849

 

>o7

 

>Sans paywall link:

 

>http://archive.vn/VxsS3

Truth Seeker ID: 0fc600 July 19, 2020, 10:59 a.m. No.2869   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Hiring Liberals Was Policy: CDC Employees Made Over 8,000 Political Contributions to PACs Since 2015 — Only 5 Were to Republican Causes

 

Obama sure did a number on America, didn’t he?

 

Even the Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) is a highly political organization today.

 

Obama ruined everything.

 

The Daily Caller News Foundation reported –CDC employees since 2015 have made over 8,000 political donations.

 

Only 5 donations went to Republican causes.

 

This is not an accident.

 

It was policy to only hire Democrats.

 

This explains their confused and ever changing coronavirus policy

 

Michael Coudry makes a good point.

 

The CDC HR department must have looked into the political background of candidates.

 

This organization must be audited.

 

President Trump made a good move when he moved the coronavirus reporting from the leftist organization.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/hiring-liberals-policy-cdc-employees-made-8000-political-contributions-pacs-since-2015-5-republican-causes/

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 19, 2020, 7:54 p.m. No.2956   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10016179

 

A New York Times Analysis found 14 states where more than half of total deaths occurred in facilities for the elderly. It was

55 percent in Connecticut,

57 percent in Colorado, North Carolina and Kentucky,

58 percent in Virginia,

59 percent in Massachusetts,

61 percent in Delaware,

66 percent in Pennsylvania,

73 percent in Rhode Island and

80 percent in West Virginia and Minnesota.

 

>Connecticut Edward Miner Lamont Jr Democrat//'///

Colorado Jared Schutz Polis Democrat//'///

North Carolina Roy Asberry Cooper III Democrat//'///

Kentucky Andrew Graham Beshear Democrat//'///

Virginia Ralph Shearer Northam Democrat//'///

Massachusetts Michael Stanley Dukakis Democrat//'///

Delaware John Charles Carney Jr Democrat//'///

Pennsylvania Thomas Westerman Wolf Democrat//'///

Rhode Island Gina Marie Ramondo Democrat//'///

West Virginia James Conley Justice II Democrat//'///

Minnesota Timothy James Walz Democratic-Farmer-Labor(DNC Affiliate)

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 19, 2020, 8:46 p.m. No.2960   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10017225

 

#Scamdemic - World is Victim of Billion Dollar Vaccine Boondoggle

 

The pharmaceutical industry is making a killing by poisoning our children.

 

The vaccine industry has poisoned an entire generation of kids, and it wasn't just autism. It was a profitable menu of mental disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, turrets, narcolepsy, and numerous allergies.

 

Now they want to take it up a notch and use COVID to poison everyone. RFK Jr. personally briefed Donald Trump, and Trump let #scamdemic happen anyway.

 

"But the problem was now [with no liability] they have no incentive to make it safe, and in fact every incentive to keep them dangerous. Why? Because they're now making 60 billion dollars a year selling the vaccines, but they're making 500 billion, half a trillion a year, selling the treatments for the chronic diseases that are caused by the vaccines. "

 

Robert F Kennedy Jr: VACCINES, BIG PHARMA, BILL GATES, AND LEGAL MONOPOLIES

 

The YouTube video of this interview of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. by the wealthresearchgroup.com is no longer available on YouTube.

 

Below are excerpts from a transcription of the original interview. Thanks to James C.

 

Transcription of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Interview

 

RFKjr–I only got 3 vaccines as a kid. Today American children get 72. And it changed the year (1989) that they gave the vaccine companies immunity from liability. So you can't sue a vaccine company in our country no matter how negligent they are, no matter how sloppy their lying protocols, no matter how toxic the ingredients, no matter grievous the injury to your child. You cannot sue them.

 

And so when that happened, it was like a gold rush. And all these vaccine companies added all these vaccines on to the schedule and that happened in 89. And so these guys who got together in 2003 at Simpsonwood were saying when we added all these new ones how come we never did amass loading analysis of all the aluminum and mercury that we were giving these kids. Because it's way beyond EPA levels and we never did the math….

 

In fact, one of them … says, "This is high school algebra. Why the hell didn't we do it?" He was crying at the time. Because they realized they had poisoned an entire generation of kids, and it wasn't just autism. It was this whole menu of mental disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, turrets, narcolepsy. And they were realizing that at that time.

 

And then they spent the second day talking about how to hide it from the public. They say, you know, if the lawyers find out about this they'll shut down the vaccine companies. And that will be the end. And we won't have a vaccine supply. So we got to protect the vaccine supply by lying to the American people about this. And there's one moment when there's …. One of the big vaccinationists, who's chief doctor at the University of Colorado, in Denver, at the medical school there, and he goes out of the meeting for a minute, his name is Johnson. He comes back in and says, "I just talked to my daughter. She just had a baby, it's the first male grandson of my lineage. And begging all of your pardon, but there's no way that I'm going to give him a vaccine. So that's what they're saying to each other. They go out of that meeting. They collect all of the studies. They say it's embargoed. Don't anybody talk about it. We're going to keep it a secret. And, you know, so I guess two years later I got that transcript. And I published excerpts from it in Rolling Stone.

 

I've actually gone through all of this stuff with Donald Trump. And his reaction is, "I want you to run a vaccine safety commission." He asked me to do that and I agree to do it. Once it got announced, [it was killed… For some reason the transcript censored some info as too hot to mention.]

 

Interviewer WRG: During this administration, this has happened?

 

RFKJr.: Yea, I thought he asked me to come in and talk to him about it, in January of 2017. And I went … I'm at Trump Towers with Steve Bannon, Reince Priebus, Kelley Ann Conway, and Jared Kushner were all in the meeting at different times. I stayed a couple of hours with him and I went through the whole thing. And he already believed… He knew enough women, including he's got three in his office, one who was in there that day. And he said they had perfectly healthy kids and they got vaccines and then they got autism. Once he started talking about it, then everybody… We actually, at one point, we asked people for stories.

 

WRG: It's an open secret basically at this point.

 

https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/07/vaccine-boondoggle.html

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 20, 2020, 5:57 a.m. No.2965   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Conclusive Proof — Masks Do Not Inhibit Viral Spread

 

Denis Rancourt, Ph.D., a former full professor of physics, is a researcher with the Ontario Civil Liberties Association in Canada. He’s held that volunteer position since 2014, which has given him the opportunity to dig into scientific issues that impact civil rights. He also did postdoctoral work in chemistry.

 

Unfortunately, the mainstream propaganda and government orders in many states in recent weeks have reverted back toward mask wearing just about everywhere. You’re not allowed into stores; you cannot fly or take a cab, Uber or Lyft without one; you must wear one everywhere you go, even outdoors, and if you don’t you’re vilified, sometimes aggressively attacked.

 

There’s No Scientific Support for Mask-Wearing

 

Rancourt’s investigation into mask wearing was part of his research for the Ontario Civil Liberties Association. He did a thorough study of the scientific literature on masks, concentrating on evidence showing masks can reduce infection risk, especially viral respiratory diseases.

 

“What I found when I looked at all the randomized controlled trials with verified outcome, meaning you actually measure whether or not the person was infected … NONE of these well-designed studies that are intended to remove observational bias … found there was a statistically significant advantage of wearing a mask versus not wearing a mask.

 

Likewise, there was no detectable difference between respirators and surgical masks. That to me was a clear sign that the science was telling us they could not detect a positive utility of masks in this application.

 

We're talking many really [high-]quality trials. What this means — and this is very important — is that if there was any significant advantage to wearing a mask to reduce this [infection] risk, then you would have detected that in at least one of these trials, [yet] there's no sign of it.

 

That to me is a firm scientific conclusion: There is no evidence that masks are any utility either preventing the aerosol particles from coming out or from going in. You're not helping the people around you by wearing a mask, and you're not helping yourself preventing the disease by wearing a mask.

 

This science is unambiguous in that such a positive effect cannot be detected. So, that was the first thing I publicized. I wrote a large review of the scientific literature about that.

 

Rancourt goes on to qualify some of this data based on the mechanism of viral transmission, which also helps explain why government responses have been ill advised, as they actually worsen transmission rather than inhibit it. Infectious respiratory diseases primarily spread via very fine aerosol particles that are in suspension in the air.

 

“We're talking about the small size fraction of aerosols, so typically smaller than 2 micrometers,” Rancourt explains. “There are water droplets that bear these virions, the virus particles, and there can be dozens or hundreds of these virions per very small droplet of this size.

 

Those are the droplets we're talking about. When you get down to those sizes, gravitational outtake is very inefficient and they basically stay in suspension. And, as soon as you have currents or flow of air, [the particles] are carried.”

 

The aerosol particles stay in suspension when the absolute humidity is low. This is why influenza outbreaks occur during the winter. Once absolute humidity rises, the aerosol particles become unstable. They agglomerate, drop out of suspension and cease to be transmissible. “This is well known,” Rancourt says. “It's been known for a decade. It's been extraordinarily well-demonstrated by top scientists.”

 

The mid-latitude band is where you find the dry weather and the temperature ideal for transmitting viral respiratory diseases. Viral infections typically spread during the winter in the northern hemisphere, and in the summer in the southern hemisphere.

 

Mask Mandates Are Indicative of Rising Totalitarianism

 

In its letter6 to the WHO, the Ontario Civil Liberties Association also addressed the issue of mask mandates as an instrument of totalitarianism.

 

“In our letter, we put it this way. There's a recent scientific study that came out n 2019. The first author is the executive director of the Ontario Civil Liberties Association that I do research for, and he's a physicist also. He wrote an article with another physicist.

 

They looked at the conditions under which a society will gradually degrade towards a more totalitarian state. What they found was that there were two major control parameters that characterize the society that will tell you if that is likely to happen or not.

 

One of those control parameters is authoritarianism in the society.

 

more: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/07/19/are-face-masks-effective.aspx

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 20, 2020, 12:41 p.m. No.3028   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10023978

>https://www.lcaction.org/

Let's get some sauces on this!

 

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/testing/serology-overview.html

 

What do your results mean?

If you test positive

 

A positive test result shows you may have antibodies from an infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance a positive result means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes thecommon cold.

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 20, 2020, 12:50 p.m. No.3029   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3030

>>>/qresearch/10024028, >>>/qresearch/10024079, >>>/qresearch/10024131

 

What COVID-19 therapy is the real “Game-Changer”? — Hydroxychloroquine or Zinc?

 

https://medium.com/@hotvpc/what-therapy-is-the-real-game-changer-cebc8838d447

 

There has been a tremendous amount of buzz regarding the use of hydroxychloroquine (HC) for the treatment of COVID-19. This has been touted as everything from a “game-changer” and “a gift from God” to begin mostly dismissed for lack of convincing evidence. The skeptics, me being one, have cited the majority of the literature demonstrating negative outcomes. Nonetheless, the pressure to forego formal clinical trials and urgently employ the drug in the face of many impending deaths of an epidemic has been enormous and completely understandable.

 

A survey reported 2 days ago of doctors around the world who have been managing COVID-19 patients place it as “the most effective coronavirus treatment” to date. The survey, conducted by Sermo, a global health care polling company, asked 6,227 physicians in 30 countries to find out what is the most effective against SARS-CoV-2.

 

That is to say, of 6,000+ doctors surveyed, 37% considered HC the most effective available. This begs the question what the other 63% considered more effective than HC and it also seems to highlight the sorry state of what we have available as treatment since the therapy considered most effective has mostly shown no beneficial effect in the small clinical trials conducted to date. They didn’t report all the breakdown of how the voting went and which were the other 14 drug choices these doctors were allowed to choose from, but it likely included the antivirals remdesivir, lopinavir, and ritonavir.

 

Aside from these clinical trials of various quality and weak or negative outcomes, there have been two recent striking clinical observations by clinicians that have played powerfully in the media because of the obviously striking outcomes. These are not clinical trials but rather anecdotal observations of larger populations of patients treated for presumed COVID-19 infections and they did not involve just hydroxychloroquine alone. But just because they are not rigorous clinical trials shouldn’t mean we should discard any clinical benefit that is so obvious that we don’t need a statistical analysis to reveal it particularly if corroborating reports are coming in from multiple observers.

 

The first one was reported by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko from Monroe, NY whereby he reported on March 21 that his team had seen about 900 patients with possible coronavirus symptoms, treating about 350 with his regimen of HC, azithromycin and zinc. None had died as of April 2nd, he said, though six were hospitalized and two were on ventilators. Despite the criticism that this was not a randomized controlled trial, still, if one can believe that the 350 patients did indeed mostly have coronavirus and can believe the numbers that this wasn’t such a bad outcome. Still, skepticism remained because of these lingering questions.

 

This morning, another such pronouncement was made. Dr. Anthony Cardillo of Los Angeles said he has seen very promising results when prescribing HC in combination with zinc for the most severely-ill COVID-19 patients. He did not report the dosages of either the hydroxychloroquine or the zinc.

 

Zinc as an anti-viral

 

Zinc is known to inhibit viral replication by a few mechanisms. The first is that zinc shuts down the very enzyme that the RNA virus needs to replicate itself inside the cell. It inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP).

 

Zinc as an anti-viral

 

Zinc is known to inhibit viral replication by a few mechanisms. The first is that zinc shuts down the very enzyme that the RNA virus needs to replicate itself inside the cell. It inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP).

 

In short, Zinc has been shown to block RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity of many RNA viruses and now this includes the SARS COV-2 virus. But it must get into the cell in order to do this.

 

Zinc utilizes zinc transport proteins to get into cells. Zinc from the extracellular milieu and from intracellular compartments enters the cytoplasm through 14 specialized trans-membrane proteins of the ZIP/SLC39 family. These transport proteins are very good at keeping zinc out unless induced to open.

 

Substances that open ion channels or that shuttle ions across membranes independent of channels are called ionophores. Zinc ionophores therefore are important in getting zinc into cells to block replication.

 

A study done in 2014, long before coronavirus was around, found that chloroquine behaved as an ionophore to open zinc channels and could therefore allow zinc into cells in sufficient quantity to stop viral replication.

 

In addition to inhibiting RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, zinc also is a potent inhibitor of the signalling cascade of interferons-lamba3, which are a family of pro-inflammatory cytokines. You may recall hearing about the dreaded ‘cytokine storm’ that suddenly alters a relatively mild case of COVID-19 tending toward recovery to sudden cyanosis with Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Zinc may play a role in preventing that storm.

 

Zinc Homeostasis as a major player in COVID-19 Pathology

 

Now that it seems plausible that zinc transport into cells is a crucial part of control of the coronavirus, it might make sense that any health condition that interferes with zinc transport would worsen COVID-19 disease and anything that promotes zinc transport would improve outcome.

 

It turns out that diabetes and cardiovascular disease reduce zinc transport while estrogen is an inducer of the ZIP6 zinc transporter. Conversely, dysfunctions of zinc transporters are promoting factors in cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer.

 

Image for post

 

Perhaps the effect of diabetes and heart disease on zinc transport explains why patients with heart disease and diabetes are at such high risk of morbidity and mortality with COVID-19 infections.

 

The effect of estrogen to induce zinc transport may further explain why men get infected with SARS COV-2 at a higher rate and have a relative risk of death 3 times that of women.

 

Are there other ionophores better than chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine?

 

Ionophore activity is in no way unique to chloroquine and HC. There are many other substances that either open zinc transporter channels or shuttle zinc into a cell across a cell membrane. hiokitiol, pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate, pyrithione all transport zinc and have been shown in vitro to inhibit viral replication. Hinokitiol is a natural substance isolated from Taiwamese ninoki tree and used as a topical antibacterial in Japan.

 

Pyrithione might be considered the gold-standard zinc ionophore in that it is used in studies looking at ability to get zinc into cells to inhibit replication. It is also a natural compound found in Persian shallot which is an Asian species of onion growing in central and southwestern Asia. It is for topical use only and often in medicated dandruff shampoos. So, even though hinokitiol and pyrithione are natural, it doesn’t look like they would be practical replacements for HC.

 

Perhaps reasonable choices as substitutes for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are quercetin and Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and even tonic water which contains small amounts of quinine (added to tonic water to make the gin and tonic a little bitter and more palatable).

 

Quercetin is a plant flavonol found in many fruits, vegetables, leaves, seeds, and grains; red onions and kale. It is found in highest concentration in capers, sorrel and radish leaves. Quercetin is a very popular supplement used as an anti-mast cell and antihistamine therapy. EGCG is a water-soluble flavonoid present in green tea. Quinine is the naturally occurring parent compound from which chloroquine and HC are synthesized. It is isolated from the bark of the cinchona (qui-qui) tree. Quinine was used liberally during the flu pandemic of 1918. Whether it helped or not, no one know because no one stopped to do clinical trials.

 

Quercetin and EGCG are among the most consumed and most studied polyphenols in the human diet .Flavonoids are considered bioactive micronutrients whose regular consumption, either as food components, or as dietary supplements and nutraceuticals, entails benefits for human health, including prevention and amelioration of cancers, diabetes, and cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases.

 

Many of the health benefits of flavonoids have historically been ascribed to their antioxidant activity, which they exert directly by scavenging reactive oxygen species and indirectly by inhibiting transcription factors and pro-oxidant enzymes. However, it is currently believed that the levels of polyphenols achieved through ingestion are not enough to justify their wide array of biological actions.

 

Diverse polyphenols have been shown able to form complexes with the redox-inactive transition metal zinc. Several studies have shown that flavonoids affect zinc metabolism including, for the purposes of this story, acting as ionophores that shuttles zinc into cells effectively.

 

A study done in 2014 in Barcelona looked at the ability of quercetin and EGCG to allow zinc into cells. This was compared against the drug clioquinol, a drug that has both anti-protozoal and anti-viral properties but has too much neurotoxicity to be considered an option for COVID-19. But it provides a positive control for the study. Unfortunately, the study did not include quinine or compare it against chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine.

 

Is there a relationship between Asia’s consumption of green tea, their low COVID-19 infection rate and their lack of embracing hydroxychloroquine?

 

To date, Japan and Singapore are among the countries with the lowest new case rates and lowest deaths per capita in the world. South Korea fared well in this respect and if one can believe China’s numbers, then overall it also kept its daily death count low throughout the pandemic. This phenomenon in Japan and Singapore is despite their rejection of the use of HC as other countries have done.

 

(Green tea and Quercetin and Zinc are all OTC. No doctors or tests needed)

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 20, 2020, 12:52 p.m. No.3030   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3029

additional images for

 

>>>/qresearch/10024028, >>>/qresearch/10024079, >>>/qresearch/10024131

 

What COVID-19 therapy is the real “Game-Changer”? — Hydroxychloroquine or Zinc?

 

from https://medium.com/@hotvpc/what-therapy-is-the-real-game-changer-cebc8838d447

Truth Seeker ID: dcb73a July 20, 2020, 3:04 p.m. No.3037   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2089

 

EXCLUSIVE: Bill Gates Negotiated $100 Billion Contact Tracing Deal With Democratic Congressman Sponsor of Bill Six Months BEFORE Coronavirus Pandemic

 

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation helped negotiate who would score a $100 Billion government-backed contact tracing contract in August 2019 — six months before the ‘pandemic’ arrived in the United States and four months before it swept through China.

 

The shocking revelations were unveiled on the Thomas Paine Podcast and the Moore Paine Show on Patreon by the two investigators who blew the whistle on the massive Clinton Foundation tax fraud during a Congressional hearing in 2018. John Moynihan and Larry Doyle testified in Congress, detailing the fraud and schemes utilized by the Clinton’s to avoid paying up to $2.5 BILLION in federal taxes.

 

The investigative duo, in their first interview since that bombshell Congressional testimony, revealed to Paine that representatives from the Gates Foundation met with U.S. Congressman Bobby L. Rush at a sit down in Rwanda, East Africa in mid August 2019 to hash out who would score the windfall from a government contact tracing program. And just last month — nine months after the meetings with the Gates Foundation in Rwanda — Rush, a Democrat from Illinois, introduced the $100 BILLION H.R. 6666, the COVID-19 Testing, Reaching and Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act.

 

Rush’s bill would establish a program run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for national coronavirus testing and contact tracing.

 

Paine has since learned Congressman Rush traveled to Rwanda with his spouse from August 12th to 19th, 2019 to take part in talks and a week-long event underwritten by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

 

https://truepundit.com/exclusive-bill-gates-negotiated-100-billion-contact-tracing-deal-with-democratic-congressman-sponsor-of-bill-six-months-before-coronavirus-pandemic/

Truth Seeker ID: 0e889a July 20, 2020, 5:29 p.m. No.3041   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2089

 

THE NASOPHARYNGEAL SWAB PCR "TEST" FOR COVID SHOULD BE AVOIDED AT ALL COSTS

 

In a 2017 lecture at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Center for Global Security Research, neuroweapons biologist Dr. James Geordano speaks of self-assembling nanoparticles being used as a "stroking" agent.

 

https://youtu.be/aUtQbriWt64

 

https://videos.utahgunexchange.com/watch/do-not-get-tested-worse-than-you-can-possibly-imagine-ms-celeste-solum-validated-again_eXC83AI1XDS6vhF.html

Truth Seeker ID: 0e889a July 20, 2020, 5:33 p.m. No.3042   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2089

 

Dr. Anthony S Fauci

License Number: D04034 

License Type: Physician-Medical Doctor

License Status: Active

Licensed Issued: 10/02/1969 

 

Eyes On:

License Expiration: 09/30/2020

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 23, 2020, 7:57 a.m. No.3299   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10054796

CENSORED: Ben Swann's - Why Face Masks DON't Work, According to SCIENCE

13-minute Fact-filled video removed from YouTube after caution notice placed on FaceBook.

 

https://youtu.be/h8upEg-bEJ8

 

>>>/qresearch/9969332

 

Why Face Masks DON'T Work, According To SCIENCE

>video description

>So much debate over whether or not we should be wearing masks in order to fight C0VlD but multiple scientific studies over the past decade have already settled this question. Not only do medical masks not prevent the spread of virus, but a 1995 study proves that wearing a cloth mask can put you at greater risk for infection. Ben Swann breaks down the science.

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd Thermo Fisher testing machine flawed? July 23, 2020, 10:45 a.m. No.3311   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10055595

https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/national/coronavirus/software-flaw-led-to-dozens-of-false-positive-covid-19-tests-kentucky-medical-group-says

 

A software flaw is being blamed for showing a positive COVID-19 test result incorrectly for more than two dozen tests.

University of Kentucky laboratory scientists say they were inspecting and reviewing raw data from a testing platform when they became concerned about discrepancies in the data. They believe the testing platform, Thermo Fisher, which was authorized for emergency use by the FDA, had a software flaw that might result in false positives.

After re-testing the samples using another platform, scientists confirmed that the tests initially reported as positive for COVID-19 were negative. The flaw was only found in one of the four testing platforms that UK's clinical laboratory uses.

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: d5d7c1 July 23, 2020, 12:21 p.m. No.3316   🗄️.is 🔗kun

More Evidence Emerges Showing Hydroxycholoquine is Effective Against Coronavirus

 

The controversial therapeutic drug Hydroxycholorquine (HCQ) is becoming the focal point once again. Vaccine efforts are still underway but more and more attention is being places on the anti-viral therapeutic. The President of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, tested positive for coronavirus and recovered quickly while taking the drug. He enthusiastically posted video of himself taking his dosage and later another video holding a packet overhead for a large cheering crowd.

 

Studies on the drugs effectiveness go back more than 50 years after the FDA first approved it in 1955. It’s derivative of chemicals discovered by Hans Andersag while he worked for Bayer in Germany. The family of drugs is effective against lupus, tumors, and various kinds of viral infections. The exact mechanism of the drug is not completely understood, but it’s presumed to somehow protect DNA by bonding with it.

 

After months of bashing hydroxychloroquine as untested, dangerous, and criticizing the President for taking it, much of the mainstream media has avoided talking about the drug lately. A new study released by the Henry Ford Foundation in Michigan shows the anti-viral drug can be quite helpful if taken during the early stages of a viral infection.

 

>https://repub.li/henry-ford-health-study-hcq-took-mortality-from-26-4-to-13-5/

 

Study Details:

 

2,541 Patients Participated in the Study with an average hospital stay of 6 days.

 

26.4% crude mortality rate for those getting neither drug

 

22.4% crude mortality rate for those getting azithromycin alone

 

20.1% crude mortality rate for those getting hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin

 

18.1% crude mortality rate for the entire group

 

13.5% crude mortality rate for those getting hydroxychloroquine alone

 

The full study was published in the International Journal of Infections Diseases.

 

As the debate about returning the school turns into a full on fight, questions about what’s really going on with the virus numbers are beginning to get more serious. The public gave great leeway to experts’ warnings, accepting lockdown and mask precautions. Weeks turned into months and despite great effort, the experts kept pressing for more closures.

 

Various anecdotal reports of questionable reporting practices and genuine failures paint a broader picture of intentional inflation. Dozens of reports from Florida have come in as 100% positive. Colorado has revised numbers down, sometimes as much as 25% at a time. Other states have been caught reporting the same case multiple times.

 

Various Governors have also been called out on policies that placed positive cases into nursing homes. Mixing a dangerous viral disease with then country’s most sensitive population is insanity. Temporary hospitals sat empty while the policy exposed many elderly and caused thousands of unnecessary deaths.

 

>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29737455/

 

source article

 

>https://repub.li/more-evidence-showing-hydroxycholoquine-is-effective-against-coronavirus/

Truth Seeker ID: be3217 July 25, 2020, 11:15 a.m. No.3543   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4021

Palm Beach CBS News Finds Suicide and a Fall Listed as COVID Deaths – Only 169 of 581 COVID Deaths Did Not Have Contributing Illnesses

 

This local TV report from CBS 12 News in Palm Beach county shows that the the inflation of COVID deaths in Florida is HUGE!

 

Florida officials included falls and at least one suicide as COVID-19 deaths.

 

A local Palm Beach investigator found that only 169 out of 581 deaths listed as COVID-19 deaths without any contributing illnesses.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/palm-beach-cbs-news-finds-suicides-falls-listed-covid-deaths-169-581-covid-deaths-not-contributing-illnesses-video/

 

https://youtu.be/5_UBJA2Ztfk

Truth Seeker ID: 48c57b July 25, 2020, 11:57 a.m. No.3549   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10074769

 

Dr. Fauci: ‘We Don’t Know’ How Less Likely People Are to Transmit Coronavirus When Wearing a Mask

 

Dr. Anthony Fauci, of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, suggested in an interview with MarketWatch on Friday that young people are “becoming part of the problem” in the outbreak of the Chinese coronavirus and admitted that experts “don’t know exactly” to what extent people are less likely to transmit the coronavirus when they are wearing a mask.

 

“You don’t realize, probably innocently, that you are inadvertently propagating the outbreak. You are becoming part of the problem because, even if you get infected without any symptoms, it is likely that you are going to infect someone else,” Fauci said of young people, contending that it is their “duty and your civic responsibility” to follow the rules.

 

He continued:

 

Sooner or later, a vulnerable person gets infected and gets seriously ill. You should realize that it is your duty and your civic responsibility: You could be hurting someone else. That’s a tough message to get because some young people feel completely invulnerable.

 

The White House Coronavirus Task Force member also talked about the importance of wearing a mask and social distancing, although when asked for an estimate of “how less likely people are to transmit coronavirus if they’re wearing a mask,” he could not provide a definitive answer.

 

“We don’t know exactly. There have been a number of meta analyses. One published in The Lancet on June 1, 2020 said masks and respirators reduced the risk of infection by anywhere from 78 percent to 85 percent,” he said.

 

“Your guess is as good as any: 50 percent to 75 percent or 80 percent is probably correct,” he added.

 

Dr. Robert R. Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said this month that universal masking for one to two months could get the Chinese coronavirus “under control,” despite a widespread lack of consensus on the matter.

 

As Breitbart News reported:

 

However, other studies emphasize the lack of a consensus on the matter. The New England Journal of Medicine, in a May study titled “Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era,” stated, “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.”

 

….

 

The study suggested, more than once, that universal masking policies may provide more of a psychological benefit than a practical one.

 

“There may be additional benefits to broad masking policies that extend beyond their technical contribution to reducing pathogen transmission,” the Journal stated.

 

“Masks are visible reminders of an otherwise invisible yet widely prevalent pathogen and may remind people of the importance of social distancing and other infection-control measures,” it continued, stating that masks serve as “symbolic roles.” It also referred to them as “talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals” and stated that “such reactions may not be strictly logical.”

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/07/25/fauci-we-dont-know-how-less-likely-people-transmit-coronavirus-wearing-mask/

Truth Seeker ID: 48c57b July 25, 2020, 12:02 p.m. No.3550   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10074800

 

California Churches Defy Gavin Newsom’s Lockdown Order: Christ Is Head of the Church

 

Two churches in California are defying Gov. Gavin Newsom’s orders to keep their doors closed because of the coronavirus, including Grace Community Church in a Los Angeles suburb, where Pastor John MacArthur posted a letter on Friday titled, “Christ, Not Caesar, Is Head of the Church.”

 

MacArthur laid out his “biblical case for the church’s duty to remain open.” The letter reads, in part:

 

Christ is Lord of all. He is the one true head of the church (Ephesians 1:22; 5:23; Colossians 1:18). He is also King of kings—sovereign over every earthly authority (1 Timothy 6:15; Revelation 17:14; 19:16). Grace Community Church has always stood immovably on those biblical principles. As His people, we are subject to His will and commands as revealed in Scripture. Therefore we cannot and will not acquiesce to a government-imposed moratorium on our weekly congregational worship or other regular corporate gatherings. Compliance would be disobedience to our Lord’s clear commands.

 

Some will think such a firm statement is inexorably in conflict with the command to be subject to governing authorities laid out in Romans 13 and 1 Peter 2. Scripture does mandate careful, conscientious obedience to all governing authority, including kings, governors, employers, and their agents (in Peter’s words, “not only to those who are good and gentle, but also to those who are unreasonable” [1 Peter 2:18]). Insofar as government authorities do not attempt to assert ecclesiastical authority or issue orders that forbid our obedience to God’s law, their authority is to be obeyed whether we agree with their rulings or not. In other words, Romans 13 and 1 Peter 2 still bind the consciences of individual Christians. We are to obey our civil authorities as powers that God Himself has ordained.

 

When any government official issues orders regulating worship (such as bans on singing, caps on attendance, or prohibitions against gatherings and services), he steps outside the legitimate bounds of his God-ordained authority as a civic official and arrogates to himself authority that God expressly grants only to the Lord Jesus Christ as sovereign over His Kingdom, which is the church. His rule is mediated to local churches through those pastors and elders who teach His Word (Matthew 16:18–19; 2 Timothy 3:16–4:2).

 

Therefore, in response to the recent state order requiring churches in California to limit or suspend all meetings indefinitely, we, the pastors and elders of Grace Community Church, respectfully inform our civic leaders that they have exceeded their legitimate jurisdiction, and faithfulness to Christ prohibits us from observing the restrictions they want to impose on our corporate worship services.

 

The letter said the church does not need the state’s permission to hold church services and urged other congregations to follow suit.

 

“Our prayer is that every faithful congregation will stand with us in obedience to our Lord as Christians have done through the centuries,” the letter concluded.

 

McCarthy’s letter comes weeks after Calvary Church Chino Hills, also a Southern California congregation, opened its door for service on May 31, Pentecost Sunday — the holy day that celebrates the anointing of the church by the Holy Spirit 50 days after Christ’s resurrection.

 

“The church transcends the governments of this world and the politics of this world because the church is a living, breathing, divine institution,” Pastor Jack Hibbs said in a video addressing other pastors about the lockdown and announcing the decision to reopen the church.

 

“We want to be safe. We want to be wise. We want to be sensitive to the weakest among us,” Hibbs said.

 

“Are we going to open our doors? Are we going to preach the Gospel?” Hibbs stated.

 

Hibbs said his prayer is that a “revival might break forth across this land” because California churches opened their doors.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/07/25/california-churches-defy-gov-newsoms-lockdown-order-christ-head-church/

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 26, 2020, 8:14 a.m. No.3592   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10082263

On March 23, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued an executive order barring pharmacists from filling prescriptions for chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, its next-generation derivative, for home treatment of COVID-19, the disease caused by the cornavirus SARS-CoV-2. But doctors are using the drugs, which are effective for treating such diseases as malaria and lupus, in huge numbers.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/thousands-of-ny-covid-patients-being-treated-with-anti-malarial-drug-hydroxychloroquine

Truth Seeker ID: a180ea INO-4800 DNA Coronavirus Vaccine July 26, 2020, 2:12 p.m. No.3606   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3642

Do people really understand what's happening with these vaccines? This one is moving at "warp speed" with $5 million in funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

 

Inovio

INO-4800 DNA Vaccine Description

 

There are currently more than 70 vaccine candidates in development for COVID-19, the illness caused by the novel coronavirus, according to the World Health Organization. Moderna and Inovio are among the five vaccine makers that have begun human trials.

 

INOVIO is a biotechnology company focused on rapidly bringing to market precisely designed DNA medicines to protect and treat people from infectious diseases.

 

Inovio's proprietary platform hand-held smart device called CELLECTRA® is leading the way forward for activation immunotherapy. CELLECTRA uses a brief electrical pulse to open small pores in the cell reversibly to allow the plasmids to enter.

 

This one-of-a-kind platform delivers optimized DNA into cells, where it is translated into proteins that activate an individual's immune system to generate a robust targeted T cell and antibody response.

 

Once inside the cell, the plasmids begin replicating, thereby strengthening the body's own natural response mechanisms.

 

The advantages of INOVIO's DNA medicine platform are how fast DNA medicines can be designed and manufactured, the stability of the products which do not require freezing in storage and transport, and the robust immune response, safety profile, and tolerability that have been demonstrated in clinical trials.

 

Inovio is aiming to significantly expand the therapeutic range of monoclonal antibodies with its DNA-encoded monoclonal antibody technology. With dMAb, Inovio encodes DNA to express a monoclonal antibody. Injection of the DNA plasmid into a patient generates robust in vivo monoclonal antibody production.

 

This approach has the potential to generate in vivo production of therapeutic antibodies. Inovio's DNA medicines are not interfering with or changing in any way an individual's own DNA.

 

DNA medicines are composed of optimized DNA plasmids, which are small circles of double-stranded DNA that are synthesized or reorganized by a computer sequencing technology and designed to produce a specific immune response in the body.

 

INOVIO states 'DNA medicines do not interfere with or change in any way an individual's own DNA.'

 

Source:

https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/vaccines/ino-4800-dna-coronavirus-vaccine

https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/05/14/is-inovio-gaining-ground-in-the-coronavirus-vaccin.aspx

 

Inovio Pharmaceuticals’ vaccine for coronavirus could be ready by year’s end.

 

Source:

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/inovio-pharmaceuticals-vaccine-for-coronavirus-could-be-ready-by-years-end-2020-03-05

 

The vaccine is called INO-4800 and works by injecting synthetic viral DNA into healthy individuals, causing their bodies' immune systems to develop protective antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Inovio boasts that the vaccine was designed in just three hours after the genome for SARS-CoV-2 was published in February.

 

Source:

https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/07/14/heres-why-inovio-is-the-front-runner-in-developing.aspx

 

Inovio, which is financed by the US Defense Department and the NGO CEPI, also said it has been included in US President Donald Trump’s plan to produce hundreds of millions of doses of the vaccine by January as part of Operation Warp Speed.

 

As for funding, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations has awarded Inovio more than $17 million for development of the vaccine. The company recently said it would use about $1 million from the grant to support large-scale manufacturing. Inovio plans on producing 1 million doses of the vaccine by the end of the year. And the Department of Defense awarded Ology Bioservices $11.9 million to enable rapid production of Inovio's vaccine. Inovio also received $5 million in funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to scale up production of its smart device.

 

Source:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-biotech-firm-inovio-reports-encouraging-virus-vaccine-results/

Truth Seeker ID: b52ba7 NewsBreak - Plandemic, A Known Live “Training Simulation Exercise” under WHO July 26, 2020, 11:57 p.m. No.3640   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2089

 

NewsBreak - Plandemic, A Known Live “Training Simulation Exercise” under WHO

 

Published on 27 Jul 2020 / In News and Politics

Mirrored from 'Inside the Matrix'

 

Major documentary confirmation of something many of us have come to know for certain in recent times: the entire COVID-19 world-shutdown is part of a live training and simulation exercise run by the unscrupulous WHO and United Nations, as documented in their Global Preparedness Monitoring Board's annual 2019 report and their International Health Regulations treaty of 2005—which 194/or 196 countries signed off on—which pretty much establishes a Global Government (of the WHO & United Nations, & the high-level international GMPB) along with their sponsors, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, & other unnamed donors.

 

Please share this video widely. People in office have failed their oaths to protect the people, and We the People need to wake up and do something definitive about it. Every government has been complicit in the destruction of their own country's economy, the vast suffering of their people brought on by these massive shutdowns and house-arrest assaults-on-the-psyche as people lost jobs, livelihood, purpose in life, social life, and were held back from any normalcy in going outdoors, even to sanctuaries in Nature but forced to wear masks in public instead and submit to police tyranny. Meanwhile, small and large businesses have crashed, families have been prevented from seeing their elderly relatives in hospice, many have died alone. Hospitals are cooking up numbers for COVID deaths, MSM plays out strings of new cases and new deaths.

 

VIDEO:

 

https://videos.utahgunexchange.com/watch/newsbreak-plandemic-a-known-live-training-simulation-exercise-under-who_C7AsTic663ZfLrk.html

 

https://everydayconcerned.net/

 

DOCS REFERENCED:

 

A World at Risk, 2019, Annual Report GPMB:

https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annual_report/GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf

 

International Health Regulations (2005)

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/246107/9789241580496-eng.pdf;jsessionid=5A9487CF0CB1888F82D9DF6CB01704D7?sequence=1

 

Some of the links/pages referenced during this video:

https://www.who.int/ihr/about/en/

https://www.who.int/gho/ihr/en/

https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-W… ()

https://www.aspeninstitute.org/

https://www.gatesfoundation.org/searc…

 

15 MEMBER BOARD OF THE GLOBAL PREPAREDNESS MONITORING BOARD

ALL AGREED TO ENGAGE in a PANDEMIC EXERCISE

 

Dr Anthony S. Fauci - Director, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, USA

Dr George F. Gao - Director-General, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, People’s Republic of China

Dr Victor Dzau - President, The National Academy of Medicine, USA

Dr Chris Elias - President, Global Development Program, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, USA

H.E. Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland - Former Prime Minister, Norway and Former Director- General, World Health Organization

Mr Elhadj As Sy - International Federation of Red Cross

Sir Jeremy Farrar - Director, Wellcome Trust, UK

Ms Henrietta Fore - Executive Director, UNICEF

H.E. Dr Diane - Gashumba - Minister of Health,Republic of Rwanda

H.E. Sigrid Kaag - Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation,The Netherlands

Professor Ilona Kickbusch - Director, Global Health Centre, Graduate Institute of Int and Dev Studies, Switzerland

H.E. Professor Veronika Skvortsova - Minister of Health, Russian Federation

Dr Yasuhiro Suzuki - Chief Medical & Global Health Officer, Vice Minister for Health, MoH, Labour and Welfare, Japan

Dr Jeanette Vega Morales - Chief Medical Innovation and Technology Officer, La Red de Salud UC-Christus, Chile

Professor K. VijayRaghavan - Principal Scientific Advisor to the Government of India

Truth Seeker ID: 7e2cbd July 27, 2020, 6:03 a.m. No.3642   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4016

>>3606

This is really, really bad.

To summarize without going deeply into the science, the viral DNA enters the host cell's nucleus, where many times it gets incorporated into the host cells' chromosomal DNA. That constitutes a permanently altered host cell genome.

DNA vaccines are PERMANENT changes to a person's genomic DNA.And if in the process of transfection the new viral DNA gets taken up by eggs or spermatogonia, that constitutes germline transmission to future offspring: a permanent change in the gene pool.

There is NO adequate testing to evaluate the health implications of having a foreign virus protein getting produced all over your body. Control mechanisms are leaky.

No matter what kind of suppressive control is built in, some host cells will keep generating that protein all the time (called constitutive expression). How might the immune system be affected if that antigen protein is made all the time at low levels - or even high levels in some tissues? Chronic inflammatory immune reactions going all the time? What if that protein expressed in nervous tissue turns out, hypothetically, to causes toxic brain inflammation conducive to neuropathy?

An even worse problem is that there's no way to know what genes are delivered by the vaccine. Big Pharma already has demonstrated no compunctions about putting/allowing all kinds of foreign genetic material into vaccines. What if it included another gene encoding an enzyme that, when expressed, causes dramatic changes in behaviour? There are many such genes, that could be turned on by providing a control chemical to a regional population, for example, in the water supply.

Remember the Gates Foundation's WHO vaccine tests in India and Africa, a few years ago, where they "accidentally" included HCG protein in a supposed tetanus vaccine, given free to Kenya. The HCG hormone induced sterility in a half million young women. That was evidently the covert purpose of the trial, since there was really no need for a new tetanus vaccine.

 

A DNA vaccine is a scary development that should be rejected.

Truth Seeker ID: c34b58 July 27, 2020, 2:14 p.m. No.3662   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Covid Facts.

American Doctors (American Frontline Doctors) Address COVID-19 Misinformation with Capitol Hill Press Conference

 

https://twitter.com/babyfist/status/1287849228035858433

 

At least watch this part

 

https://twitter.com/JustInformU/status/1287822324700389377

 

>https://youtu.be/oaX8-JbaacE

Truth Seeker ID: 48c57b July 27, 2020, 5:41 p.m. No.3679   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Harvey A. Risch, MD, PHD , Professor of Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health says that HCQ CURES patients who contract Covid-19.

 

https://www.newsweek.com/key-defeating-covid-19-already-exists-we-need-start-using-it-opinion-1519535

Truth Seeker ID: be3217 July 27, 2020, 8:20 p.m. No.3683   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Clinical trials of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 outpatients reported as safe

 

Instead, it said, “Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine can cause abnormal heart rhythms such as QT interval prolongation and…ventricular tachycardia,” especially among those using HCQ with azithromycin or those who already had kidney or heart problems.

 

But read the graphic. Heart rhythm issues were not observed among patients in the trial.

 

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200727/Clinical-Trials-of-Hydroxychloroquine-in-COVID-19-Outpatients-Are-Safe.aspx

Truth Seeker ID: be3217 July 27, 2020, 9:36 p.m. No.3687   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10098039

>>>/qresearch10098063

 

https://americanmind.org/essays/the-covid-coup/

 

The COVID Coup

by Angelo Codevilla

 

Essay 07.17.2020

 

And how to unlock ourselves.

 

Panicked by fears manufactured by the ruling class, the American people assented to being put essentially under house arrest until further notice, effectively suspending the habits, preferences, and liberties that had defined our way of life. Most Americans have suffered economic damage. Many who do not enjoy protected status have had careers ended and been reduced to penury. Social strains and suicides multiplied. Forcibly deferring all manner of medical care is sure to impose needless suffering and death. In sum, the lockdowns’ medical and economic dysfunctions make for multiples of the deaths and miseries of the COVID-19 virus itself.

 

Bad judgments and usurpations—the scam, not the germs—define this disaster’s dimensions. The COVID-19’s devastating effect on the U.S. body politic is analogous to what diseases do to persons whom age (senectus ipsa est morbus) and various debilities and corruptions had already placed on death’s slippery slope.

 

Outside of the few who have gained (and are still gaining) power and wealth from the panic, Americans are asking what it will take to end this outrage—not to modify it with any “new normal” decided by who knows whom, on who knows what authority. Since no one in authority is leading those who want to end it, Americans also wonder who may lead that cause. What follows suggests answers.

 

What history will record as the great COVID scam of 2020 is based on 1) a set of untruths and baseless assertions—often outright lies—about the novel coronavirus and its effects; 2) the production and maintenance of physical fear through a near-monopoly of communications to forestall challenges to the U.S.. ruling class, led by the Democratic Party, 3) defaulted opposition on the part of most Republicans, thus confirming their status as the ruling class’s junior partner. No default has been greater than that of America’s Christian churches—supposedly society’s guardians of truth.

 

Truth

 

Since obfuscation, pretense, and lies concerning the COVID-19 are the effective agents of the panic and of the seizure of arbitrary power, truth and clarity about it are the foundational requirements for escaping its effects. Here is a dose.

 

From early March 2020 on, the best-known authorities on epidemics—the World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control—presented the COVID-19 respiratory disease to the Western world as a danger equivalent to the plague. But China’s experience, which its government obfuscated, had already shown that the COVID-19 virus is much less like the plague and more like the flu. All that has happened since followed from falsifying this basic truth.

 

Our “best and brightest,” at first having minimized fears of person-to person contagion during January and February, during which the disease spread from China to the West, then declared that the virus is unusually contagious, and posited—on zero factual basis—that it would kill up to one in twenty persons it infected—5% infection/fatality rate (IFR). Based on that imagined fatality rate, they adopted mathematical models from Britain and the University of Washington that predicted that up to two million Americans would die of it.

 

The U.S. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) modeled the authoritative predictions on which the U.S. lockdowns were based. Its model also predicted COVID deaths for un-locked-down Sweden. On May 3 it wrote that, as of May 14, Sweden would suffer up to 2800 daily deaths. The actual number was below 40. Whether magnifying this falsehood was reckless or willful, it amounted to shouting “fire!” in a crowded theater. What justifies listening to, and paying, people who do that kind of science?

 

Establishing any infectious disease’s true lethality is characteristically straightforward: test a large sample of the population proportionately representative of location, age, sex, race, socioeconomic categories. Follow up with the subjects a month later to add up the rate of infections and learn the results thereof. Period. Today, we still lack this definitive, direct knowledge of COVID’s true lethality because bureaucrats have prevented widespread testing for the purpose of firmly establishing the one figure that matters most. That is because that figure’s absence allows them to continue fearmongering.

 

In May the Centers for Disease Control, by then discredited professionally (though not, alas, in the mass media), was forced to conclude that the lethality rate, far from being circa 5% was 0.26%. Double a typical flu. The CDC was able to keep the estimate that high only by factoring in an unrealistically low figure for asymptomatic infections—never mind inflated figures for deaths. But the U.S. government, instead of amending its recommendations in the face of reality, tried to hide reality by playing a shell game with the definition and number of COVID “cases.”

 

During March and April, the authorities had defined as “cases” people sick enough to be hospitalized, who also tested positive. Whoever divided the number of reported deaths (a number inflated by a CDC directive to count deaths due to other causes as being due to COVID) by the number of cases thus defined, was predictably scared and willing to heed “the best advice”—namely societal lockdowns—on how to stay safe. That turned out to be ruinous in and of itself. At the time, they defined the number of these “cases” as the “curve” which we were supposed to sacrifice so much to “flatten,” lest the wave of hospitalizations overwhelm our health care system. Because their premises were wrong, that wave never came.

 

Instead, in May, as various non-official surveys were published showing that the majority of those who tested positive for COVID either barely knew that they had been infected or had not known at all, these very authorities doubled down their dishonesty. They began labeling mere infections as “cases.” They divorced reporting of these “cases” from reporting of the number of deaths, and warned the inattentive public about “spiking COVID cases” as if infection carried a serious risk. They also promoted widespread testing of wholly asymptomatic persons for current and past infections, the results of which tests were sure to produce a surging number of new “cases” thus defined.

 

And they toyed with reporting deaths by attributing to COVID any that “involved” or looked as if they might have involved it. They then included pneumonia, influenza, and COVID into the category PIC. That is how the death figure came to exceed 100,000. But if the CDC had used the same criterion that it did with the SARS virus, namely “severe acute respiratory distress syndrome,” the figure by the end of June would have been some 16,000.

 

Such naked ploys could succeed only because the media colluded in them. The New York Times’ May 27 lead story ominously blared: “California is the fourth state with more than 100,000 known cases.” Meanwhile, the number of deaths attributed to COVID continued dropping from ever-lower bases. By the July 1, even using the CDC’s inflated figures for COVID-responsible deaths, COVID-19’s Infection Fatality Rate for people under 70 was 0.04%. But rather than ask how clarion calls of danger comport with decreasing reports of deaths that may somehow be associated with it, the ruling class agitated to reverse returning to normal life. Be afraid, be very afraid. Heads the House wins, tails you lose.

 

Irrefutable if indirect indication that COVID is no plague also comes from comparison between the number of deaths attributed to COVID-19 during any given period with the number of deaths due to all causes for the same period—despite official inflation in the number of deaths attributed to the virus.

 

The Imperial College, London’s tally for Great Britain, broken down by age of death, shows that the chances of dying from COVID-19 infection roughly track the chances of death from all causes at any given age, except for the very young. For men, the chances of death co-incident with the virus don’t exceed 1%, or the average death rate, until age 70. For women, they don’t exceed the average death rate until close to age 90. In Spain, the death rate for infected persons over 90 years old was 10%.

 

The measure of “excess deaths” tells a similar story. During the six-week peak of the COVID event in 2020, deaths in the U.S. exceeded deaths during the same period in the previous year by 82,000. Considering that, concurrently, the 2020 flu season was one of the worst on record (typically the flu is responsible for some 50,000 deaths during the season) and given the CDC-mandated conflation of COVID numbers with others, the COVID-19 pandemic in and of itself did not amount to much—except in New York City, for reasons only partly known. By the week of June 20, 2020 the CDC was reporting ZERO excess deaths—meaning that the figure for weekly deaths was within the long-term normal curve for that time of the year.

 

Not incidentally, in 1957 some 116,000 Americans (out of a population two thirds of today’s size) died of the flu. Ten years later, the toll was 100,000 and in 2019 it was 61,000. By June 2020 the (inflated) toll from COVID-19 stood at 100,000.

 

In short, COVID-19 is not America’s plague. It did not shake America. The ruling class shook it. They have not done it ignorantly or by mistake. They have done it to extort the general public’s compliance with their agendas. Their claim to speak on behalf of “science” is an attempt to avoid being held accountable for the enormous harm they are doing. They continue doing it because they want to hang on to the power the panic has brought them.

 

BTW: Whenever you hear someone claiming to speak on science’s behalf, referring to authorities rather than to facts and logic, you may be sure that person is a fraud.

 

Falsehood

 

Falsehood extorted shutdowns, which caused deaths and ruined lives.

 

“Lockdowns” of the general population had to be based on the premise that everyone is, if not equally vulnerable, then equally responsible, and hence that everyone must stay cooped up to contribute to everyone else’s safety. But because every word of that is contrary to reality, false, a lie, applying the lockdowns’ force to society has caused needless deaths and suffering.

 

Prefatory to considering the lockdowns’ specific effects, we must be clear about what separation of infected or possibly infected persons from presumably un-infected ones can and cannot do. This has been known to whomever wished to know it since the Middle Ages, and repeated even in the humble 1956 study guide for the Boy Scout Public Health merit badge: protecting the un-infected from infection by limiting their contact with those who may be infected depends on knowing that the people to be protected really are un-infected.

 

Medieval Venetians, to make sure that no one coming from places infected by the plague would bring it into the city, prevented debarking from ships coming from such places for forty days (quarantine). By the same token, quickly finding the few infected among the many un-infected, and removing them even faster along with those with whom they had been in contact (known these days as contact tracing), is effective only to the extent of the bulk of the population’s near-virginity.

 

But, once an infectious disease has spread within a population, quarantines and associated measures are a waste at best. Personal hygiene and minimizing contact (what we now call social distancing) retain all their natural importance for reducing any given individual’s chances of infection to some extent—perhaps even delaying chances of exposure until the disease has run its course. But, once a contagion is rooted in a population, these measures make no difference to general public health. The disease running its course means, in part, that enough people have been infected and hence will have developed immunity, that they can no longer transmit it to others (herd immunity).

 

That is how human communities have lived with and through history’s countless epidemics. We have seen this once again in how COVID-19 affected Sweden and U.S. states (e.g. South Dakota and Arkansas) that never did shut down. When COVID-19 hit Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel said that, regardless of what anyone did, some 70% of Germans would eventually become infected. And that would be that.

 

Isolation makes the biggest of differences, however, to sub-categories of the population that may be especially vulnerable to the disease. The Bubonic Plague was an equal-opportunity killer, as was Smallpox. COVID-19, however, seems to discriminate a lot. Yes, all diseases are most noxious to those already most debilitated. But this one seems to have done so more than most.

 

In Italy, 99.1% of those who died with or of COVID-19 also suffered from other diseases. But this virus obviously has a special predilection for those with type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, compromised lungs, and most of all for the very old—to the point that a study by Germany’s Ministry of the Interior asked whether it made any sense to ascribe to any cause the deaths of persons whose bodies were in the process of shutting down anyhow. By contrast, COVID-19’s effect on ordinary healthy persons is considerably milder than those of ordinary respiratory diseases. What sense, then, could general isolation ever have made in the context of COVID-19?

 

It made some sense in the context of the U.S. ruling class’s (tragically wrong) assumptions/pretenses/convictions (take your pick) that the COVID-19 is so infectious as well as plague-like in its lethal danger to the general population, that a wave of desperately ill and dying patients would submerge American hospitals unless its natural course were slowed. Hence all medical decks had to be cleared of all other activities, emergency hospitals had to be constructed in the parks, and the Navy’s hospital ships had to be brought in.

 

As we have seen, there was never the slightest evidence that the COVID-19 virus could produce mass casualties. From the first, all evidence pointed in the opposite direction. Even in New York, where Governor Cuomo hyperventilated panic, the hospitals in the park and the Navy’s hospital ship were virtually empty.

 

But the ruling class’s attachment to its assumptions/pretenses/convictions overrode the obvious truth that the elderly and infirm should have special isolation from contact with persons possibly infected with the virus and that the rest of the population should go about its business.

 

The U.S. authorities, the “experts,” the ruling class, chose to do precisely the opposite. They “locked down” a general population that is at virtually no risk, thereby delaying the virus’s spread to people it could not harm and whose infection would build herd immunity. Keeping millions of people indoors also worsened their health. Keeping people from interacting and working normally wrecked economic and social life.

 

Worst of all, these authorities, these experts, transferred elderly persons known to be infected with the virus into nursing homes. In Michigan, the authorities even assigned to a nursing home an aide known to be infected with the virus. As a result, the as-yet fully uncounted deaths in these facilities, which house about 1.3 million people (about 0.39% of the population) come to about half of the total U.S. death toll. That is what happened, and it is perverse. It deserves punishment.

 

Doubly so because of the cruelty with which it was done. As known virus carriers and unscreened persons were moved in, as the contagion raged, the debilitated, powerless inmates were prohibited visits from their families. These, being nearly all uninfected, would have posed no danger. Had the families been allowed to visit, they might have become aware of what was happening. As it was, they were powerless to save these innocents who, without advocates, were effectively condemned. One New York nurse was fired for objecting. Triply perverse, because some of the officials responsible—e.g. Pennsylvania’s Secretary of health—knew what they were doing enough to pull their own relatives out of danger.

 

Others, e.g. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, who sent 4,500 COVID-infected patients from hospitals to nursing homes and blew off his responsibility for over 5,000 deaths with the words “people die,” later deflected responsibility onto what legitimately may be deemed to be national policy. He cited guidance from the Centers for Disease Control: “’Nursing homes should admit any individuals from hospitals where COVID is present.” Both the lockdown for ordinary people and the transfer of COVID carriers to nursing homes, said Cuomo, followed CDC recommendations. Cuomo did not resist the recommendation. He was occupied trying to score political points on Donald Trump.

 

In May Dr. Anthony Fauci, the federal COVID team’s most influential MD, explained the counterproductive national lockdown of healthy people on national television. Earlier, he had said lockdowns were needed to preclude the overcrowding of hospitals. That having proved to be his gross professional error as an epidemiologist, he now said that extending the lockdowns was necessary to prevent so many apparently healthy young people from eventually infecting the old and infirm.

 

But there is zero evidence that apparently healthy (i.e. asymptomatic though infected) people infect others with the COVID-19. The evidence is that only symptomatic people (ones with coughs and sniffles) do, and that not through casual contact. Moreover, if separating known spreaders had been Fauci’s intention all along, why had the CDC ordered known COVID carriers to be shifted to nursing homes? At the very least, the man who drove the COVID team did it in a reckless manner that killed people. He too had other things on his mind—political ones.

 

Similarly, Governors from New York to Michigan and Illinois, to California, Oregon, and Washington have ordered citizens to stay indoors—which always was and once again proved to be the ideal environment for the transmission of respiratory viruses. Illinois’s governor criminalized more than two people in any boat. Californians have been arrested for walking on the beach, and New York City’s mayor threatened to pull swimmers out of the sea. All in the name of Science. Online searches find no science that shows viruses thriving in fresh air and sunshine, never mind in salt water. The mayor of Los Angeles ordered residents to wear masks at all times outdoors, though there is no evidence that this virus transmits through casual proximity anywhere, but especially outdoors.

 

In July, Anthony Fauci said that masks are necessary. But in March the same Fauci had said they did more harm than good—equally without the slightest scientific proof. Surreally, the L.A. Health Department specified that persons should wash their hands after putting on unwashed face coverings, and refrain from touching their faces—except to put on the face coverings that were supposed to make their hands dirty to begin with! Science, anybody? Fauci also guided governors to permit people to congregate by the hundreds at Walmart and Costco, but to forbid them to do so in churches. This fount of Science also gave his imprimatur to sex among strangers but advised Christians to refrain from Communion. Too intimate. What level of partisan credulity does it take to believe any of that?

 

One may also ask what level of partisan credulity it takes to take seriously such personages as the governors of New York, Michigan, and California and the mayors of Chicago and Los Angeles, who personally flout the regulations they try to impose on others. Restrictions for thee but not for me!

 

The answer really does lie in the depth of political party/class solidarity. The governors and officials who imposed, maintain, and rationalize the lockdowns are all but one (Ohio’s) Democrats. Their counter-factual assumptions/pretenses/convictions, their misrepresentations, their falsehoods and outright lies, are all about their social class’s effort to secure their privileges against an increasingly recalcitrant general population.

 

Politics

 

We begin by focusing on how seamlessly the Western world’s ruling class has translated the COVID-19 event into yet another of its weapons in the fight it has been waging this century against voters’ growing disaffection. Support for the lockdowns has become as integral to the American Establishment Left, i.e., to the Democratic Party, as belief in abortion, global warming, open borders, and censorship of whatever they choose to call “hate speech.” To understand this, one must realize that the ruling class’s campaign regarding public health, global warming, race, the rights of women, homosexuals, micro-aggressions, the Palestinians, etc. etc. have far less to do with any of these matters than with seizing ever more power for itself.

 

Intersectionality

 

We note that the language, the attitudes, by which the ruling class have hyped COVID’s health challenge have been integrated into the identities of its constituency’s manifold components so as to add force to the longstanding demands of each. How readily—how naturally—activists for Black Lives Matter, Feminism, Global Warming, etc. have adopted support of all manner of socioeconomic restrictions on the pretend-basis of saving lives from the COVID as if it were their own cause, is yet another practical manifestation of the latter-day Left’s theory of “intersectionality.” As the activists of Black Lives Matter burn down buildings, they also wear masks supposedly to show their commitment to social responsibility for public health. Nor incidentally, they also tout their commitment to LGBTQ sexuality, for abortion, and against the nuclear family. The same may be noted about every component’s support of every other.

 

By the same token, every one of the ruling class’s constituencies, the disparity of their foci notwithstanding, has adopted as its own the demand that voting in American elections must henceforth be “from home,” with ballots collected or “harvested” by third parties. That would shift electoral power from those who vote to those who process and count the votes—i.e. to themselves. Hence it would set the entire ruling class free from the voters.

 

Each sub-constituency translates the accusation into its own idiom. In America, accusations of racism are the lowest (alas the most common) form of political pandering and intimidation. Securing over 90% of the black vote being the sine qua non of the Democrat Party’s electoral successes, no one was surprised when the New York Times, followed by the rest of the major media, noted that, the COVID-19 having struck African Americans proportionately harder than other races, proves American society treats them despicably and must submit to reform.

 

Yet at the Times, CNN, etc. they know that this is a lie and that, regardless of race, adverse outcomes of COVID-19 infections go along with obesity, type 2 diabetes, etc. And they know as well as anyone precisely to what extent African Americans exhibit these very conditions proportionately more than other races, and that these conditions have more to do with calories today than with slavery two centuries ago.

 

The COVID event has also made the face mask into a physical badge of tribal identity, common to all the sub-constituencies. Wearing the mask is now about publicly distinguishing the virtuous and deploring the deplorables. North Carolina’s Democrat Governor Roy Cooper said that “A face covering signifies strength and compassion for others” and “wearing one shows that you care about other people’s health.” On the same day, New York’s Andrew Cuomo put it this way: “Wearing a mask is now cool, I believe it’s cool…. Wearing a mask is officially cool.”

 

Anthony Fauci, who in March had told 60 minutes “there’s no reason to be walking around with a mask,” in May gave his scientific judgment that masks are “a symbol for people to see that that’s the kind of thing you should be doing,” while admitting that they are “not 100% effective.” He could hardly have done otherwise since the New England Journal of Medicine had said: “wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers [the wearer] little, if any, protection from infection,” and is irrelevant to others in casual contact. Such a symbol of intersectional identity has it become that, as rioters were burning Minneapolis, its Democrat mayor urged the rioters whom he let burn parts of his city to make sure they wore masks while doing so.

 

In sum, the lockdowns have been perpetuated and prolonged by people who care more about your compliance than your health.

 

Regime of Fear

 

They are about increasing the Democratic Party’s chances in the 2020 election.

 

The 2016 U.S. election confronted the U.S. ruling class with the possibility that the presidency’s enormous powers might be used to dismantle its network of prestige and privileges. The public is just beginning to understand the extent to which all manner of bureaucrats and allies used their powers to try defeating the challenge of 2016, and then instituted the socio-political equivalent of basketball’s “full court press,” treating anything and everything about the Trump administration as illegitimate, running official investigations not to gather information but as pretexts for feeding slander to their media associates. They tried to catch Trump in perjury traps. They toyed with the idea of leading him into statements that might be construed as bases for removal from office. But the U.S. economy boomed. Trump’s ratings rose. As 2020 dawned and Trump seemed a cinch for re-election, the Democratic Party et al. were grasping at straws for ways of getting at him.

 

By the time COVID came over the horizon, thought of using it had already crossed ruling class’s minds. No conspiracy was necessary or possible. The existing party sentiment and like-mindedness were enough to produce the unanimity and uniformity with which the ruling class has used the COVID-19 event to produce, stoke, and maintain fear, to energize its constituencies’ agendas in pursuit its power.

 

In January 2017 Dr. Anthony Fauci, speaking at Georgetown University, said he had no doubt that the Trump administration would face a “surprise outbreak” of “infectious diseases.” A few days earlier, The Atlantic published an article titled “How a Pandemic Might Play Out Under Trump,” which wished out loud that Trump’s handling of such an event would undermine his presidency. Yet earlier, NYU professor Arthur Caplan had published an article along the same lines: “The End of Civilization and the Real Donald Trump.” In short, weaponizing a public health event had crossed eager minds.

 

The prospect of locking down the country, ostensibly to save it from COVID-19, offered a near monopoly of communications. Trump’s rallies were shut down. Above all, churches were shut down, as well as the countless meetings of clubs, businesses, friends, etc. that are the lifeblood of what one might call the country class. Nor may people congregate as they wish for political purposes: the strictures that North Carolina’s Democrat governor put on the Republican National Convention made it impossible to hold it in that state.

 

Without face-to-face contact, television became the chief means by which communication took place—but it was one-way communication, whose programming and corporate advertising—immediately—began telling the people the joys of obedience: “we are all in this together,” “ Alone, together.”

 

It reeks of Orwell. The companies whose advertising pays for this are household names: Adidas, Amazon, Airbnb, American Express, Bank of America, BMW, Burger King, Citigroup, Coca Cola, DHL, Disney, eBay, General Motors, Goldman Sachs, Google, IBM, Mastercard, McDonald’s, Microsoft, Netflix, Nike, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Sony, Starbucks, Twitter, Verizon, Walmart, Warner Brothers and YouTube. The ruling class.

 

Driven by the politics of partisan identity, the ruling class used the COVID-19 event to collapse American life.

 

A glance is enough to reveal the perverse enormity of what it caused.

 

Because the lockdowns closed most restaurants and hotels, where about half of the nation’s calories were consumed, demand for food shifted in ways that made it impossible for distribution networks and processing plants to adjust seamlessly—especially as the government limited their operation and paid workers to call in sick. Millions of gallons of milk have been poured down drains, millions of chickens, billions of eggs and tens of thousands of hogs and cattle have been destroyed, acres of vegetables and tons of fruit disked under. Vineyards have been ripped out. This scrambled allocation and waste of food resulted in shortages. Prices in the markets rose. In some places, meat and eggs were rationed. Persons deprived of work have less money with which to pay these prices, and struggle to feed their families. This reduced countless self-supporting citizens to supplicants at food banks.

 

Who could produce surplus and scarcity simultaneously except sorcerers’ apprentices wielding government power? That’s expertise for you. By intentionally reducing the supply of food available to the population, the U.S. government joined the rare ranks of such as Stalin’s Soviet Union and Castro’s Cuba.

 

But no sane person had ever imagined the near-shutdown of a whole nation’s entire medical care except for one disease. The U.S. government did that, on the advice of its very best experts. Between mid-March to July hospitals stood nearly empty, having cleared the decks for the (ignorantly) expected COVID flood. Patients having been discouraged or forbidden to come in for other reasons, doctors and nurses were idled. Not a few were furloughed. Emergency rooms were closed to most of their customers—the poorer people who routinely get routine care there. Private clinics and practices—where most Americans get most medical care—practically shut down. Many will never reopen. Forget about dentistry. This has meant that most Americans have been left essentially without medical care for about a third of a year.

 

Tests missed, conditions not diagnosed, treatments forgone or delayed. Human bodies’ troubles not having taken a corresponding holiday, it is impossible to estimate how much suffering and death this lack of medical care has caused and will yet cause—all while the U.S. government was making it happen. Officials who claim to be smarter than we ordered it—for our own good, they claim.

 

More than forty million Americans have filed claims for unemployment assistance since the shutdowns began. To this number one must add the as-yet unknown tens of millions owners of small businesses which were forced to close or radically to reduce activity. Add to that the uncountable millions not directly affected—farmers, professionals—whose products and activities the shutdowns de-valued. Imagine the millions of careers wrecked, the shattering of dreams that had been realized by lifetimes of work, and you search for words to describe it: Catastrophe? Tragedy? Man-made, for sure.

 

The experts who made this happen stigmatized, tried to silence, and effectively criminalized dissent as dangerous to health and, of course, as racist. But there is zero evidence that all or any of the above measures increased anybody’s life expectancy, and plenty to the contrary. They wronged America. But why? and cui bono?

 

Power

 

All of the above served the ruling class’s overarching interest in its own power. Are there any categories of people who benefited from the shutdowns? Government gained. We know of no employee of federal, state or local government who was furloughed or had his or her pay reduced. On the contrary, all got additional power. The federal government created trillions of dollars, the distribution of which is enriching the usual suspects involved in administration. The teachers’ unions gained the power to extort concessions as a price for reopening schools. Among them, restrictions on or elimination of charter schools.

 

And as independent businesses were throttled, big ones grew. The biggest, Amazon, was the biggest winner. The news media, unrestricted and at the service of the powerful, themselves exercised unprecedented power. The social media platforms seconded the coup by censoring dissent from the “line” of their own most aggressive bureaucrats and officials. Try getting figures for COVID deaths and how they are counted from Google. YouTube deleted a video gone viral of two medical doctors who pointed out the truth about the COVID-19’s true lethality as dangerous disinformation, and Twitter appended a note to President Trump’s objection to voting by mail for facilitating fraud, accusing it of falsehood.

 

Prohibitions such as of playing in the park or swimming in the sea are mere devices to train the public to accept unlimited bureaucratic discretion. You may congregate at Costco, but not at church. Failure to obey regulations will land ordinary citizens in jail, while the jails release robbers and child molesters. You may not exceed limits on occupancy or fail to wear a mask. You may not even sing in church. But if you and friends loot and burn the neighborhood store, the police will just stand by. Yet all Democrat governors celebrated and some joined masses of “protests”—forget about masks and social distancing. They did this not for anybody’s health but to to secure another few percentage points of the black vote for their party and to leverage their seizure of power over police forces.

 

We are supposed to believe that all this is dictated by “Science.” In June, 1,200 “health experts” signed a letter approving the BLM protests because, it said, “white supremacy is a lethal public health issue.” But it cautioned that “this should not be confused with a permissive stance on…protests against stay-home orders.” In short, Coronavirus restrictions, like the rest of political correctness’s commandments, are pure political weaponry—nothing short of an inversion of the American people’s priorities, accomplished by nobody’s vote. Ruling class presumption. In short, we are living through a coup d’état.

 

Declaring emergencies to excuse taking “full powers” is the oldest of ploys. Does anybody remember the Reichstag fire? The prospect of similar things happening in America had been rising along with the ruling class and the administrative state. The authorities’ seizure of arbitrary power in the name of expertise is the deadliest strike at our way of life. Suspending law and rights, issuing arbitrary rules of behavior, has been mostly the doing of Democrat-controlled state and local government. But the lead came from the Democrat-controlled Federal bureaucracy, empowered by a president elected as a Republican, and with the silent complaisance of perhaps a majority of Republican politicians.

 

The ruling class’s gains of power and money have been at the country class’s expense, and have depended on suppressing truth.

 

An egregious example of forcible official lying is the ruling class’s political campaign against the drug Hydroxychloroquine. President Trump had pointed to the truth that this standard treatment for malaria for more than a half century is effective against the early and mid-stages of the COVID disease. This fact had been discovered accidentally and confirmed by studies and practices in France, Spain, India, and South Korea. In April, U.S. doctors started prescribing it widely, reported good results, and took it themselves prophylactically. The ruling class found this intolerable because it contradicted its narrative that nothing could prevent the sky from falling, but above all because its success might cast a favorable light on Trump. Hence it set about canceling truth about drugs from public consciousness and substituting its own narrative.

 

The ruling class machine began by labeling reports of the drug’s success as “anecdotal.” Then, the Veterans Administration gave the drug in small doses to some 380 elderly patients dying with/of the COVID. Every major media outlet touted their deaths as proof of its ineffectiveness and danger. On May 22, the Lancet, arguably the most authoritative medical journal, published what it called an analysis of the world’s biggest medical data base showing, definitively it claimed, that Hydroxychloroquine is ineffective, counterproductive, and dangerous. The Yale School of Medicine officially concluded that the drug is bad stuff, despite a study to the contrary by its own professor of epidemiology, Harvey Risch. The great Anthony Fauci who, when pressed hard, had said that he would take the drug were he to be sick of the COVID, then backed the political narrative by quipping that, as of now there is no treatment for COVID illness. The U.S. food and Drug Administration stopped clinical trials, pharmacy boards refused orders from physicians and retailers, and hospitals around the country required their physicians to stop treating their patients with it.

 

It turns out, however, that the Lancet study’s database was part of a fly-by-night, strictly political operation, and that its details are literally incredible—e.g., the number of reported Hydroxy deaths for one Australian hospital exceeded the number of total deaths for the entire country. In short, the report was another professionally unsustainable hit job. The New York Times reported that “More than 100 scientists and clinicians have questioned the authenticity” of the database as well as the study’s integrity. The Lancet withdrew it in shame.

 

But it was too late. Fauci and the medical establishment did not apologize. For the media and for headline-readers, the case was closed. The lie stood. Then, on July 1, Michigan’s Henry Ford health system published a peer-reviewed study that shows Hydroxychloroquine significantly cut death rates even in mid-to-late COVID cases. Again, the ruling class machine ignored the truth. Again: all mainstream news about the COVID affair is related to health only incidentally. Be very afraid.

 

Nor has the COVID affair to do with any emergency—except possibly the 2020 election. Democrat politicians and the stream of public service TV advertising have left no doubt that the ruling class’s objective is to establish “a new normal” by extending into the indefinite future the powers by which bureaucracies have eclipsed America’s laws and way of life.

 

But, as the Authorities toyed too openly with the truth, they impeached themselves and lost authority. Fewer and fewer believe what they hear from on high. As Russians under Communism learned, the truth is usually the opposite. Whenever the government reported bountiful harvests, they stocked up on potatoes.

 

Default, and Consequences

 

Fairness requires noting that, regardless of whatever America’s ruling Left has done, whatever its hopes, plans, or coordination, what actually happened to the United States of America consequent to COVID could not have happened had President Donald Trump, much of the Republican Party, and America’s religious establishment not concurred in its happening.

 

This is another way of saying that the ruling class rules by size and seduction, as well as by intimidation. It did not rush into imposing the shutdowns, or even into making too big a deal of COVID. Its parts and personages did not fully commit themselves until after they had convinced president Trump to give them the preclusion of opposition without which inflicting so much pain on so many would have exposed them to official and popular retribution.

 

President Donald Trump, having cut travel from China on January 31 and from Europe on March 12 had maintained his grip on public opinion while pointing to the evidence that that COVID is not catastrophic. He sustained accusations of xenophobia. But, as the virus took root in America, the opposition shifted to blaming him for doing nothing in the face of a plague. Countering that would have required standing on the truth, attacking the central falsehood that the COVID is a plague, and its purveyors as liars. Since the experts had been wrong again and again, this was doable.

 

But on March 15, Trump asked the country to shut down for fifteen days to slow the spread of the disease—to flatten the curve. Then, on March 31 the New York Times crowed victoriously that the previous week, President Trump had been stampeded to abandon his goal of restoring normal life by Easter: “The numbers the health officials showed President Trump were overwhelming. With the peak of the coronavirus pandemic still weeks away, he was told, hundreds of thousands of Americans could face death if the country reopened too soon.” Also, poll questions that framed the choice just so had helped produce another set of numbers. Said the Times: he was told that “voters overwhelmingly preferred to keep containment measures in place over sending people back to work prematurely.” Trump let himself be scared into sheltering politically under what he supposed would be the protective professional wings of Dr. Anthony Fauci and the CDC.

 

Trump believed that Fauci would cooperate in a plan for reopening, and counted on the Democratic Party sharing credit for providing near a trillion dollars in relief to the people who the lockdowns were depriving of livelihood.

 

But, once Trump let go of the truth, he ceded control and entered a political blind alley. Trump was giving the de facto alliance between the Democratic Party, Fauci et al., the press, and a host of profiteers public credit even as they discredited him in every way possible. They had him where they wanted him. As the lockdowns throttled America, they used the political leverage to raise demands. They aimed at his political demise as well as at economic, social, and political transformation.

 

The guidelines for “Opening Up America Again” that Trump unveiled on April 17 resulted from that imbalance of political credit and leverage. Far from returning the country to what it had been, the “data-driven” process they outlined, written by Fauci’s CDC, would make sure that state and local officials so inclined now have top-level, pseudo-legal cover for keeping or reimposing whatever arbitrary restrictions on opponents they think they can get away with, with whatever data they can manipulate to that purpose.

 

The Guidelines “advise” (that means “mandate” for officials who so choose) opening only to a percentage of capacity, and with restrictions—e.g. no singing in church,—that counter their reason for being. But churches and small business cannot survive at less than at full capacity. Schools set up other than for maximum concentration on the stuff to be learned are counterproductive. In short, the guidelines give federal sanction to choking America’s “main street” sector.

 

The guidelines’ arguably most dangerous legacy may be their recommendation/requirement that governments certify persons’ safe status for work and public interaction by tracking and isolating persons infected with the virus—or said to be. This involves hiring hundreds of thousands of persons to enforce compliance with decreed regulations on personal behavior—effectively a “lifestyle police,” empowered at the very least to declare anyone the equivalent of “medically untouchable.”

 

The governors of Michigan and California (there is no dissent among Democratic Party officials) have already defined “racism” as a major health hazard. Is there any doubt that these police will be less concerned with health as ordinary people understand it than with enforcing their chiefs’ will on political opponents? Thus, without law or trial, anyone could be separated peremptorily from job, business, or family, pending redress in the courts—which most people cannot afford.

 

Were this practice adopted nationally, it really would be the centerpiece of a “new normal.” By May, New York’s mayor had already deputized hundreds of (arguably former) gang members and criminals, paying them to circulate among the general population to “encourage”—dare we say, intimidate?—citizens to follow the Mayor’s orders. He also offered rewards for reports on neighbors’ violations of those orders. This is the beginning of explicitly partisan policing more as in China than in the America in which we grew up. Not incidentally the World health Organization—an extension of China’s government, formally recommended that nations “observe active surveillance and tracing of their populations.” Presumably, when the next virus comes along, the ruling class’ arbitrary powers will ratchet up yet another notch.

 

Sadly Anthony Fauci, whose reputation could not withstand any sort of scrutiny, retains the capacity to mislead because no one with a major national audience has publicly scrutinized it.

 

All of this, one must keep in mind, is so because President Trump’s complaisance with the ruling class’s falsehoods about the virus precluded high-level affirmation of the truths that negate the COVID Coup lies and pretenses. That he gave that complaisance contre coeur is beside the point. When pressed, Trump stuck by the falsehoods, as he did on April 22, after Georgia’s Republican governor, Brian Kemp, who had opposed the lockdowns, announced that he was lifting them in his state. Trump chastised him publicly in the strongest terms, prompting the media into an orgy of accusations that Kemp was turning Georgia into a death camp. As it happened, Georgia got healthy. But that did not matter.

 

The biggest and most significant default however, has been that of America’s Christian churches—all of them—from their hierarchs to their priests, pastors, and ministers. Their complaisance with the lockdowns set aside a truth far more important to human dignity than anything having to do with any physical ailment—the one truth that puts all human power in proper perspective, the truth on which our civilization itself rests: that no human power can manufacture true and false, right and wrong, any more than we can make ourselves, and that, therefore, we are obliged to “render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and unto God the things that are God’s.”

 

Jewish congregations have been similarly craven.

 

The churches’ agreement to suspend public worship and the distribution of sacraments also contradicted their duty. Until 2020, Christian clergy felt obliged not just to offer public worship to whomever, but also to search out the sick, to offer sacraments to the dying, especially in places where victims of plagues lay between life and death—regardless of consequences. Because surrendering to secular dictates concerning how congregants should behave, even in church cannot be justified in Christian terms it would not have crossed previous generations of churchmen’s minds.

 

Had this generation of church leaders simply practiced their faith, even by merely keeping silent about the ruling class’s claims about the COVID-19 rather than ignorantly, submissively endorsing them, they would have preserved their intellectual and moral credit to help the general population to deal with the growing realization that they had been duped. Instead, they chose to be complicit with tinpot Caesars. Hence, as Americans face the bitter fact that we have been hurt worse than for nought, the churches have largely disqualified themselves as arbiters of truth.

 

Truth and clarity about what history will record as the 2020 COVID coup is the necessary condition for the American people to overcome its effects. Overcoming those effects must begin with discrediting those pretenses and the reputations of those who made them.

 

Who Will Lead Us?

 

Uncompromised leadership is in short supply because few prominent persons have resisted ruling-class pressure to join its COVID narrative. But so anxious are Americans for truth about what happened, what is happening; so substantively thin are the lies on which the scam has been based, and so abundant are the resources for establishing the truth; so hungry are Americans for examples of successes in countering the scam, that a few courageous leaders in key places may suffice.

 

The following outlines how the U.S. Senate can function as a truth commission concerning the COVID coup’s several aspects, and how state governors so inclined can provide practical leadership to motivate, guide, and legitimize life independent of our dysfunctional ruling class.

 

With regard to the latter, we note that the manner in which states and localities run by Democrats have managed the COVID event differs from that of places otherwise governed as if they were from regimes, countries, even civilizations, alien to one another. This is yet more evidence that American society has largely broken into incompatible pieces, and that avoidance of civil war may hinge on mutual tolerance of parting ways. More on that below.

 

Truth Commission

 

In the past, as the misbehavior of important persons confused and divided Americans, wise senators summoned to public hearings those involved in the controversies, put them under oath and hence possible penalty for perjury, and established the often-uncomfortable truth on which the country came together. In 1948 Senator Richard Nixon’s (R-CA) hearings showed beyond doubt how deeply Soviet intelligence had penetrated our government. Between 1951 and 1957, Senator Estes Kefauver (D-TN) exposed and hence dismantled the mafia’s control of the U.S. labor movement. In 1974 Senator Sam Ervin’s (D-NC) hearings left no doubt about President Nixon’s role in the Watergate coverup. Today, the COVID scam being based on lies and misrepresentations by countless important persons, rigorous public testimony under oath can expose them and those who spread them.

 

Because of jurisdictions and/or of particularly able chairmen, the Senate’s Committee on Homeland Security and Oversight, on Health, Education and Labor, on Finance, and on the Judiciary, each can shine their particular lights on specific aspects of the problem.

 

Senator Ron Johnson’s (R-WI) Committee on Government Affairs, with oversight over the Centers For Disease Control, can set the record straight about how its relationship with China’s laboratories, with the World Health Organization and with the Chinese government itself has shaped how the U.S. government has dealt COVID. The CDC having grasped enormous powers over American life, the Committee can inquire about the level of expertise it has brought to its task. What, if anything, justifies its claim to scientific management? The Committee can also audit how the CDC’s expenditure of funds and efforts among a variety of political, non-health topics affected its readiness to deal with the recurrence of viruses from exotic places.

 

Its subcommittee on Oversight and Emergency Management, under Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), himself a physician, is well placed to expose who knew what about the COVID-19 virus, when they knew it, who told the public what, and on what basis. The public has noted with dismay the discrepancy and contradictions about COVID-19 from supposedly medical experts, most prominently by Dr. Anthony Fauci.

 

At different times, these experts told us that the virus posed very little danger, and that it was a mortal threat to us all, that masks were useless, and then essential. On the basis of their many statements, hundreds of millions of American lives were wrecked, and millions continue to languish under “guidelines” that make no sense on their face. Expert questioning under oath in front of the cameras can let the American people judge for themselves what sense they make. The experts will have to reveal what medical expertise might have led them to stigmatize young people relatively unaffected by the COVID for going to the beach while not objecting as greater numbers of higher-risk black Americans rioted in the streets.

 

The jurisdiction of Senator Charles Grassley’s Finance Committee (R-IA) includes unemployment compensation, social services, and Medicare/Medicaid. The COVID event having caused some forty million persons to file for unemployment, having placed unusual burdens on all manner of government services, and having roiled food markets in ways harmful to health as well as suggestive of possible price fixing, this Committee is well placed to unravel the causal threads between the strictures that governments have placed on the population and the troubles that ensued. Grassley, one of the Senate’s better investigators, can showcase categories and individuals hurt by the lockdowns and call governors to square the harm they caused with the benefits they claim they achieved. Who lost my job? Who destroyed my business? where do I go to rebuild what I lost? These are some of the questions that the committee can put to officials on the American people’s behalf. Grassley and ranking Democrat Ron Wyden (D-OR) can also bring to bear their staff’s expertise regarding nursing homes to probe how government policy brought about the holocaust that the COVID-19 wrought in them.

 

Parents all over America wonder about the basis on which the 2019-20 school year was cut in half and the bases on which the 20-21 year was compromised. Senator Rand Paul’s Subcommittee on Children and Families can put such questions authoritatively to the officials who made that call, confront the projected risks with reality, and weigh them against the results of lost education and social disruption.

 

Americans ask by what right governors and mayors essentially put people under house arrest without due process, and had them arrested for such activities as playing in the park or paddling in the sea; by what right they shut down religious services, etc. What else may government do in violation of the Bill of Rights? Under the U.S. Constitution, what limits are there on a citizen’s obligations and rights? These are some of the questions with which Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) can confront federal, state, and local officials summoned before Senate Judiciary’s Subcommittee on the Constitution. Cruz would also summon officials of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division and ask why they have not treated state and local officials’ denial of the free exercise of religion and of freedom of assembly as violations of the First Amendment. What is their understanding of civil rights?

 

The American people have an interest in knowing how the mentality of current officials is changing the practical meaning of the Constitution’s words. Cruz might well ask, government officials having changed the meaning of the basic bargain between people and government, what remains of the people’s obligation to obey the government?

 

Exemplary Leadership

 

Publicly contrasting the thoughts, deeds, and consequences of the officials and professionals who made the COVID event such a tragedy with those of the officials and professionals who led in opposite directions would not be the least of the beneficent results from serious hearings. Most Americans don’t know, but should, that several U.S. States never did shut down, while others reduced activities far less than the likes of California and New York. Like Sweden’s government, these states’ officials never saw reason to believe that the COVID was the plague and believed that individual persons’ exercise of responsibility for themselves is the surest guarantee of safety for all.

 

But the differences in what happened in California and Florida, in New Jersey and South Dakota do not speak for themselves. That is why the public would benefit by seeing these states’ governors defending their widely different perspectives on the COVID, and their results.

 

Perspective

 

It should be clear that the COVID event in America is only tangentially about health. It is essentially a political campaign based on the pretense of health. Mere perusal of news from abroad is enough to see that this is true as well throughout the Western world. Throughout, the campaign by governments and associated elites has essentially smothered social and economic activity. Not least—and by no means incidentally—it has smothered the overt political opposition which had increasingly beleaguered said governments and elites throughout the Western world.

 

Through the previous decade, the various failures and inadequacies of these governments and elites, of “Davos Man,” had become the prime subject of public discourse. At the very least, the COVID campaign changed the subject to physical safety and economic survival. Davos Man tightened control by using the state’s coercive power more forcefully than in wartime, covering its class by claiming to speak for “science” in a manner that precludes counterargument.

 

In America as elsewhere, there was no doubt about which sectors of society were on what side, who were the campaign’s protagonists, winners, and losers. The governments, their bureaucracies, the major legacy political parties, the celebrities and the media, Davos Man, were on one side. On the other were middle class people and their “populist” representatives. As the northern hemisphere’s summertime was banishing the latest respiratory virus, Davos Man strove to make as many restrictions as possible part of a “new normal.”

 

In Europe as in America, the COVID affair was but the latest round in which the very same protagonists had faced off. There as here, the language and attitudes with which Davos Man denigrated its supposed inferiors in the COVID affair fit seamlessly into previous patterns of the larger, long-term struggle. Had there been any doubt that the COVID-19 virus was more an occasion than a cause, it vanished at the end of May as, on both sides of the Atlantic, Davos Man switched to berating ordinary people and their civilization and ginned up yet another campaign to beat back challenges to its power.

Angelo Codevilla is a Senior Fellow of the Claremont Institute and professor emeritus of International Relations at Boston University.

Truth Seeker ID: 0fc600 July 28, 2020, 6:32 a.m. No.3691   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3695

Viral Video of Doctors Countering Coronavirus Narrative Being Deleted

 

https://repub.li/viral-video-of-doctors-countering-coronavirus-narrative-being-deleted/

 

July 28, 2020

Steve Alexander

 

A group of doctors stood in Washington DC and recorded a video countering the coronavirus narrative. The video received instant attention and garnered many millions of views overnight. Overnight on Facebook it rose up to the #2 most engaged post site wide. The video was live-streamed with 185,000 viewers. It had over 17 million views before it was removed from Facebook. It’s also been highly targeted for censorship and been deleted from Twitter, YouTube, and Google.

 

Facebook’s Communication Director, Andy Stone, openly admitted to deleting the video. He says “we removed it for sharing false information about cures and treatments for COVID-19.” However Andy Stone does not appear to have any medical credentials and he does not indicate what contrary information he has that proves the video is false information. In this case social media ‘experts’ outweigh the medical advice of actual doctors.

 

The group is called America’s Frontline Doctors. Their site motto says that “American life has fallen casualty to a massive disinformation campaign.” In the presentation various doctors speak at the podium about personal experiences with patients and problems with the medical industry. They describe the effectiveness of therapeutic treatments and how those treatments are being suppressed in favor of ventilator and hysteria.

 

There’s growing evidence to support expanded use of hydroxycholoroquine. A Henry Ford study showed that the therapeutic took the crude-mortality rate from 26.4% to 13.5%. Their study was published in the International Journal of Infections Diseases and President Trump even tweeted about it. The deep state media complex was quick to reply, publishing articles hours later that warn of dangers.

 

The findings are completely opposite of what many top medical experts and mainstream media outlets were telling us. Early in the coronavirus pandemic anecdotal reports from physicians internationally were met with skepticism. Major outlets in the US panned the drug as dangerous and highly risky. The President was ridiculed for suggesting it’s use, even after announcing he had been taking it for several days.

Study Details:

 

2,541 Patients Participated in the Study with an average hospital stay of 6 days.

26.4% crude mortality rate for those getting neither drug

22.4% crude mortality rate for those getting azithromycin alone

20.1% crude mortality rate for those getting hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin

18.1% crude mortality rate for the entire group

13.5% crude mortality rate for those getting hydroxychloroquine alone

 

PIIS1201971220305348-1Download

 

Growing censorship of the effectiveness of certain treatments against coronavirus is alarming. The medical industry carries out the practice of medicine. There is a constant quest for improving results, quicker treatments, and more powerful cures. It’s normal for scientific fields to question findings but the method of suppressing legitimate results has taken this dispute to full on propaganda. The motive is certainly designed to suppress use of the therapeutic treatments for one reason or another. The victims unfortunately are wholly unaware of potential life-saving treatments being withheld.

 

Studies on the drugs effectiveness go back more than 50 years. The FDA first approved it in 1955 after one of it’s derivative of chemicals was discovered by Hans Andersag while he worked for Bayer in Germany. The family of drugs is effective against lupus, tumors, and various kinds of viral infections. The exact mechanism of the drug is not completely understood, but it’s presumed to somehow protect DNA by bonding with it.

 

Various anecdotal reports of questionable reporting practices and genuine failures paint a broader picture of intentional inflation. Dozens of clinics in Florida have submitted numbers that were 100% positive. Colorado has revised numbers down, sometimes as much as 25% at a time. Other states have been caught reporting the same case multiple times.

 

Various Governors have also been called out on policies that placed positive cases into nursing homes. Mixing a dangerous viral disease with then country’s most sensitive population is insanity. Temporary hospitals sat empty while the policy exposed many elderly and caused thousands of unnecessary deaths. Decisions to place the most infections with the highest risk demographic could be considered negligent homicide. A prosecutor could rightly ask, why a single positive case went to a nursing home while field hospitals sat empty.

Truth Seeker ID: 0fc600 July 28, 2020, 6:51 a.m. No.3693   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10100634

>Many states have enacted administrative policies blocking access to the drug. Politicians are stripping best medical practices from our MD's and Pharmacists and enforcing policies that exacerbate the problem in order to keep the scamdemic hoax alive.

>That defines "Crimes Against Humanity". The politicians and bureaucrats who are complicit in this crime need to be held accountable legally and financially.

 

See what the policy is in your state here:

https://www.lupus.org/advocate/state-action-on-hydroxychloroquine-and-chloroquine-access

Truth Seeker ID: 0fc600 July 28, 2020, 8:03 a.m. No.3695   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4065

>>3691

Americas Frontline Doctors for download

https://seed122.bitchute.com/uodF3ygizxSy/09K3kIwzeewO.mp4

 

America's Frontline Doctors Summit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKbQbcInHnA

 

America's Frontline Doctors Summit- Session 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aX_Q1FaY9pI

Truth Seeker ID: 6ddf6c July 28, 2020, 2:22 p.m. No.3750   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2089

 

VACCINE COMPANIES PARTNER WITH MASTERCARD TO MERGE VACCINES WITH CASHLESS MONEY SYSTEM

 

Trust Stamp Biometric Program uses technology called Evergreen Hash

that creates a 3D mask based on a single picture of a person's face.

The hash is updated every time the person gets another vaccine.

 

A partnership between the Bill Gates-backed GAVI vaccine alliance and the biometric ID company, Trust Stamp, will test a digital identity system to be linked to Mastercard’s click-to-pay system. The goal is to eliminate cash. The program will be introduced in West Africa and will be tied to the COVID-19 vaccine to be made mandatory in 2021. Your vaccine status will be updated as you receive more vaccines.

 

A biometric digital identity platform that “evolves just as you evolve” is set to be introduced in “low-income, remote communities” in West Africa thanks to a public-private partnership between the Bill Gates-backed GAVI vaccine alliance, Mastercard and the AI-powered “identity authentication” company, Trust Stamp.

 

The program, which was first launched in late 2018, will see Trust Stamp’s digital identity platform integrated into the GAVI-Mastercard “Wellness Pass,” a digital vaccination record and identity system that is also linked to Mastercard’s click-to-play system that powered by its AI and machine learning technology called NuData. Mastercard, in addition to professing its commitment to promoting “centralized record keeping of childhood immunization” also describes itself as a leader toward a “World Beyond Cash,” and its partnership with GAVI marks a novel approach towards linking a biometric digital identity system, vaccination records, and a payment system into a single cohesive platform. The effort, since its launch nearly two years ago, has been funded via $3.8 million in GAVI donor funds in addition to a matched donation of the same amount by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

 

In early June, GAVI reported that Mastercard’s Wellness Pass program would be adapted in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Around a month later, Mastercard announced that Trust Stamp’s biometric identity platform would be integrated into Wellness Pass as Trust Stamp’s system is capable of providing biometric identity in areas of the world lacking internet access or cellular connectivity and also does not require knowledge of an individual’s legal name or identity to function. The Wellness Program involving GAVI, Mastercard, and Trust Stamp will soon be launched in West Africa and will be coupled with a Covid-19 vaccination program once a vaccine becomes available.

 

https://needtoknow.news/2020/07/vaccine-companies-partner-with-mastercard-to-merge-vaccines-with-cashless-money-system/

 

https://www.technocracy.news/trust-stamp-vaccine-record-and-payment-system-to-be-tested-on-low-income-africans/

Truth Seeker ID: 000000 Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) court filing, HCQ/FDA interference July 29, 2020, 9:08 a.m. No.3826   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Grabbed from QR.

 

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) court filing, HCQ/FDA interference

 

Jul 22, 2020, 09:26 ET

 

TUCSON, Ariz., July 22, 2020 /PRNewswire/ – This week the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons submitted additional evidence to a federal court for why interference with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) should end by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), in AAPS v. FDA, No. 1:20-cv-00493-RJJ-SJB (W.D. Mich.).

 

"As confirmed by another recent study of thousands of patients at the Henry Ford Health System in Michigan, HCQ is both very safe and highly effective in treating COVID-19, reducing mortality by 50%," AAPS informed the court in its filing. "Countries with underdeveloped health care systems are using HCQ early and attaining far lower mortality than in the United States, where [HHS and the FDA] impede access to HCQ."

 

Yet most Americans are still unable to obtain HCQ for early treatment of COVID-19, and virtually no Americans are able to access it as preventive medicine. HCQ has been used safely for decades by travelers to protect against malaria, but Americans are dying from COVID-19 while HCQ is withheld from them.

 

"Citizens of the Philippines, Poland, Israel, and Turkey all have greater access to HCQ than American citizens do," observes AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly. "In Venezuela, HCQ is available over the counter without a prescription, while in the United States pharmacists are prevented from filling prescriptions for HCQ."

 

AAPS rebuts arguments presented by the FDA, which implied that medications are approved as safe only for certain conditions. In fact, HCQ and most medications have been approved without limitation, such that physicians can prescribe them for any off-label use.

 

"The mortality rate from COVID-19 in countries that allow access to HCQ is only one-tenth the mortality rate in countries where there is interference with this medication, such as the United States," explains Andrew Schlafly.

 

Polish chemists have even showed the world how to synthesize HCQ from cheaply, widely available ingredients. The cost of this medication is less than a dollar a dose, in contrast with the very expensive alternatives being pushed by FDA officials.

 

In its filing, the FDA insisted that the public has no right to access nearly 100 million doses of HCQ which were donated to the Strategic National Stockpile. HHS is having that medication waste away while Americans are dying from COVID-19.

 

"In some areas of Central America, officials are even going door to door to distribute HCQ," Andrew Schlafly adds. "These countries have been successful in limiting the mortality from COVID-19 to only a fraction of what it is in wealthier countries."

 

AAPS filed this lawsuit to obtain legal redress in support of Trump, by ending the obstruction by the FDA of his policies that would save lives.

 

AAPS has represented physicians of all specialties in all states since 1943. The AAPS motto is omnia pro aegroto, meaning everything for the patient.

 

SOURCE Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)

 

Related Links

 

http://www.aapsonline.org

 

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/more-evidence-presented-for-why-hydroxychloroquine-should-be-made-available-in-a-new-court-filing-by-the-association-of-american-physicians–surgeons-aaps-301098030.html

Truth Seeker ID: 566b22 July 31, 2020, 1:51 p.m. No.3963   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10141871

Science teacher speaking in code for youtube video to bypass Nazi Censors. Carbon dioxide levels skyrocket in mask after 10 breaths according to CO2 detector

>Science Teacher Explains Why Children SHOULD not Wear Face Masks When They Return to School

>457,361 views

>•Jul 22, 2020

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1bc5500tBQ

Truth Seeker ID: 234005 Potential of UV, sunlight, humidity, to kill virus Aug. 1, 2020, 9:06 a.m. No.4007   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4008 >>4009

This important research (reported at WH briefing on April 23, 2020) has gotten totally overlooked. I want to bring it to our attention once again.

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-briefing-31/

 

With that, Mr. President, I’d be pleased to call Bill forward. Bill Bryan leads the Science and Technology Directorate at the Department of Homeland Security and now will make a presentation on their recent study.

 

ACTING UNDER SECRETARY BRYAN: Thank you, Mr. Vice President. Thank you, Mr. President —

 

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Bill.

 

ACTING UNDER SECRETARY BRYAN: — for this opportunity to do this today.

 

Good afternoon everybody. My name is Bill Bryan and I lead the Science and Technology Directorate at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Over the last several months, we’ve intensified the Department’s R&D efforts to identify and deliver information that informs our response to COVID-19. S&T is working to identify, develop, deploy, and deploy the tools and information to support our response to this crisis.

 

As part of our efforts, we’re leveraging the unique capabilities of S&T’s National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center to study the biology of the COVID-19 virus. This center is a high-biocontainment laboratory located in Frederick, Maryland. It was established in the early 2000s, in response to the Amerithrax attacks, and where we study, characterize, analyze, and develop countermeasures for biological threats to the homeland. We work closely with the CDC, FDA, HHS, and also our Department of Defense colleagues and many others.

 

Yesterday, I shared the emerging results of our work that we’re doing now with the Coronavirus Task Force. And today, I would like to share certain trends that we believe are important.

 

If I may have the first slide, please. And while that’s coming up, our most striking observation to date is the powerful effect that solar light appears to have on killing the virus — both surfaces and in the air. We’ve seen a similar effect with both temperature and humidity as well, where increasing the temperature and humidity or both is generally less favorable to the virus.

 

So let me illustrate with this first slide. If you look to the right, you’ll see that term “half-life,” with a bunch of timestamps on there.

 

First, let me tell you what a “half-life” is. We don’t measure the virus as far as how long we live on the surface; we have to measure the decay of the virus in terms of its half-life, because we don’t know certain elements. We don’t know how much a person expectorates when he — when he spits — right? — when he sneezes, whatever the case may be. We don’t know how much virus is in there. So it’s — that has a long — a bearing on how long the virus is going to be alive and active. So we measure it in half life because half-life doesn’t change.

 

So if you look at an 18-hour half-life, what you’re basically saying is that every 18 hours, the virus — it’s the life of the virus is cut in half. So if you start with 1,000 particles of the virus, in 18 hours, you’re down to 500. And 18 hours after that, you’re down to 250, and so on and so forth. That’s important, as I explain in the rest of the chart.

 

If you look at the first three lines, when you see the word “surface,” we’re talking about nonporous surfaces: door handles, stainless steel. And if you look at the — as the temperature increases, as the humidity increases, with no sun involved, you can see how drastically the half-life goes down on that virus. So the virus is dying at a much more rapid pace, just from exposure to higher temperatures and just from exposure to humidity.

 

If you look at the fourth line, you inject summer — the sunlight into that. You inject UV rays into that. The same effects on line two — as 70 to 35 degrees with 80 percent humidity on the surface. And look at line four, but now you inject the sun. The half-life goes from six hours to two minutes. That’s how much of an impact UV rays has on the virus.

 

The last two lines are aerosols. What does it do in the air? We have a very unique capability — I was discussing this with the President prior to coming out; he wanted me to convey it to you — on how we do this. I believe we’re the only lab in the country that has this capability.

 

But if you can imagine a Home Depot bucket — a five-gallon Home Depot bucket — we’re able to take a particle — and this was developed and designed by our folks at the NBACC. We’re able to take a particle of a virus and suspend it in the air inside of this drum and hit it with various temperatures, various humidity levels, multiple different kinds of environmental conditions, to include sunlight. And we’re able to measure the decay of that virus while it’s suspended in the air. This is how we do our aerosol testing.

 

We worked with John Hopkin Applied Physics Lab, and we actually developed a larger drum to do actually more testing. And it’s four times the size of that. So this is the capability that we bring to this effort.

 

So, in summary, within the conditions we’ve tested to date, the virus in droplets of saliva survives best in indoors and dry conditions. The virus does not survive as well in droplets of saliva. And that’s important because a lot of testing being done is not necessarily being done, number one, with the COVID-19 virus, and number two, in saliva or respiratory fluids.

 

And thirdly, the virus dies the quickest in the presence of direct sunlight under these conditions. And when you — when you look at that chart, look at the aerosol as you breathe it; you put it in a room, 70 to 75 degrees, 20 percent humidity, low humidity, it lasts — the half-life is about an hour. But you get outside, and it cuts down to a minute and a half. A very significant difference when it gets hit with UV rays.

 

And, Mr. President, while there are many unknown links in the COVID-19 transmission chain, we believe these trends can support practical decision making to lower the risks associated with the virus.

 

If I can have my next slide.

 

And when that — while that comes up, you’ll see a number of some practical applications. For example, increasing the temperature and humidity of potentially contaminated indoor spaces appears to reduce the stability of the virus. And extra care may be warranted for dry environments that do not have exposure to solar light.

 

We’re also testing disinfectants readily available. We’ve tested bleach, we’ve tested isopropyl alcohol on the virus, specifically in saliva or in respiratory fluids. And I can tell you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes; isopropyl alcohol will kill the virus in 30 seconds, and that’s with no manipulation, no rubbing — just spraying it on and letting it go. You rub it and it goes away even faster. We’re also looking at other disinfectants, specifically looking at the COVID-19 virus in saliva.

 

This is not the end of our work as we continue to characterize this virus and integrate our findings into practical applications to mitigate exposure and transmission. I would like to thank the President and thank the Vice President for their ongoing support and leadership to the department and for their work in addressing this pandemic. I would also like to thank the scientists, not only in S&T and the NBACC, but to the larger scientific and R&D community.

 

Thank you very much.

 

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Bill.

 

Q Mr. Bryan —

 

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. So I asked Bill a question that probably some of you are thinking of, if you’re totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that too. It sounds interesting.

 

ACTING UNDER SECRETARY BRYAN: We’ll get to the right folks who could.

 

THE PRESIDENT: Right. And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that. So, that, you’re going to have to use medical doctors with. But it sounds — it sounds interesting to me.

 

So we’ll see. But the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute, that’s — that’s pretty powerful.

 

# # # # # # # #

 

There were a few MSM reports immediately after Mr. Bryan's presentation but most were spun negatively. The press put emphasis on Trump's question to the Drs. as to whether introducing light into the body somehow could defeat the virus and they somehow turned that question into a suggestion of injecting bleach then ridiculed it. This caused Bryant's presentation to be completely disregarded. Maybe this calls for an ABCU article.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8252701/Coronavirus-dies-SUNLIGHT-just-minutes-reveals-striking-study.html

 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11468665/coronavirus-dies-sunlight-us-homeland-security-study/

Coronavirus dies in SUNLIGHT in minutes, groundbreaking Homeland Security study claims

 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/04/23/dhs-study-shows-potential-of-heat-humidity-to-kill-coronavirus/

DHS Study Shows Potential of Heat, Humidity to Kill Coronavirus

 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/23/politics/who-is-bill-bryan-dhs/index.html

Homeland Security official who detailed effect of temperature on coronavirus isn't a scientist but has a long military background

Truth Seeker ID: 234005 Aug. 1, 2020, 9:22 a.m. No.4008   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4007

Here's a hit-piece from AP on Bill Bryan published the very next day.

Senior official William Bryan cited by Trump is subject of investigation

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/nation/2020/04/24/senior-official-william-bryan-cited-trump-subject-investigation/3024720001/

 

→ Video Clip of Bryan's Presentation

Virus does less well in sunlight and warm, humid conditions

Bill Bryan presentation at WH briefing video clip

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/video/virus-sunlight-warm-humid-conditions-70319331

 

DHS initiating crucial research to mitigate COVID-19 March 26, 2020

https://www.pncguam.com/dhs-initiating-crucial-research-to-mitigate-covid-19/

 

[name spelling corrected]

Truth Seeker ID: 234005 Aug. 1, 2020, 9:40 a.m. No.4009   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4007

>Maybe this calls for an ABCU article.

 

I am drafting an article. It suggests that people need to spend more time outside in sunlight, warmth, and fresh air, not coop themselves up inside of buildings with masks on.

Truth Seeker ID: bacc0d Aug. 1, 2020, 11:34 a.m. No.4011   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This is post is preliminary- will compile in article form after I verify a few facts and download all of the audios. Just wanted to see if anyone had any corresponding info to add.

 

Local LaSalle Parish Sheriff [also head of homeland security, not sure what area or if that accurate, confirming with a local source now ] says numbers are inflated up to 46 percent [in his parish]. Since he has chosen to talk about it, LDH is taking away his ability to access the list unless he signs a non-disclosure. 9 other parishes in Louisiana reporting similar errors in the numbers from LDH but only a few will come forward.

 

The Sheriffs office daily sorts thru the list from DHS removing duplicates and irrelevant results (non residents, inaccurate prison counts, etc.). He has attempted to contact the Governor’s office to no avail.

Now He is saying LDH will remove access to lists older than 30 days old. (He has printed copies) making evidence of this allegation nearly impossible to prove.

 

 

Governor’s office denies all allegations.

[will insert audio of interview here]

 

I have full res photos on my phone in the event they would be needed. hopefully these are small enough.

 

https://soundcloud.com/moongriffonshow/lasalle-parish-sheriff-says-he-removed-duplicate-names-himself

 

https://soundcloud.com/moongriffonshow/moon-griffon-show073120

 

http://gohsep.la.gov/ABOUT/PARISHPA

 

https://www.facebook.com/pg/LaSalle-Parish-Homeland-Security-130719677048498/about/?ref=page_internal

 

https://www.facebook.com/The-Jena-Times-Olla-Tullos-Urania-Signal-137449289664279/?tn=kCH-R&eid=ARD9QdMGB6bJTlmZ8Mmwn72ErHvN5TeICPL6S2be8RCqNDtHdtAVh6ImsFaZnU1vhyxhf1Uz6R1XZV09&hc_ref=ARRcbQdYtnoMVqpSVKpLmvnCGbGywbAjKG8Y5BoMN9A38yukk9qXaQhdrdPO1ckrtdw&fref=nf&xts%5B0%5D=68.ARA8SSnDiVXrDfMgfH-ARTAMnaVoBaDPjA0NzP5z_SBth7pNmbiJkAmQZstAP3T2lZalRdsEB0XUn4Mz5GQKW4GVcyG34NAHpBO7LZ4U0WnL0_GysXLS-Ydx_v89OJuclYP38e6zI7jB4H6jrzmHtjbFxgh1PXYgeBwoVBMisxtDjQ9jHCoF2chrAKuosb8cPqwDklrS3cqKg1HPHixS6_wuCX_NSSxziJBORDtVVO69bwIQpNJ6wtbW7T_mPjvX30CCmwcZay-QuCXurVgjPnGtnzhVPv5AGOHxiC2kPswO27FpMAsIz0VryuD7IfBhmJir1RUwOwVDU3Puu_3VN-9izjrnNVD-rnyhr4M7cIyRb6B2Jpe8c6WzqbW5VyoXxPrPxy5PJJalE_LYBbwXW0PUKvcCHz3aJ0SZBkWKw7UWSiZdNPy3YYEYjMSiI1R6sd5fRY87YL-Edu3Qu_MkczzEiQdOixOwdr2Dl57i6PAVy0zvB3y86iK7

Truth Seeker ID: 461088 The RECOVERY Trial Aug. 1, 2020, 12:11 p.m. No.4014   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Instead of the US suspending and firing doctors for sharing information regarding clinical trials, perhaps The RECOVERY Trial's approach would be more beneficial for advancing discussions related to the viability of individual COVID-19 therapeutics.

 

Fauci and Gates are full aware of these public data sets.

 

Why isn't the public?

 

-------

 

The RECOVERY Trial

https://www.recoverytrial.net/

 

RECOVERY is a randomised trial investigating whether treatment with either Lopinavir-Ritonavir, Hydroxychloroquine, Corticosteroids, Azithromycin, Convalescent plasma or Tocilizumab prevents death in patients with COVID-19. In partnership with the Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford (research encompasses observational epidemiology, randomised controlled trials and health services research across all settings).

 

Data from the trial are regularly reviewed AND REPORTED, so that any effective treatment can be identified quickly and made available to all patients. Please see our news page for results that RECOVERY has already found. The RECOVERY Trial team will constantly review information on new drugs and include promising ones in the trial.

 

The RECOVERY Trial is registered at ISRCTN50189673:

http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN50189673

 

EU Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT 2020-001113-21

https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-001113-21/GB

 

Clinical Trials.gov: NCT04381936

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04381936

 

FUNDERS

 

This trial is supported by a grant to the University of Oxford from UK Research and Innovation/National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and by core funding provided by NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome,  the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Department for International Development, Health Data Research UK, the Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, and NIHR Clinical Trials Unit Support Funding.

 

Also see:

Research in the Context of a Pandemic

H. Clifford Lane, M.D., and Anthony S. Fauci, M.D.

July 17, 2020

DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe2024638

 

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2024638

 

And another falsified disclosure form submitted by Fauci, stating no conflicts of interest:

https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMe2024638/suppl_file/nejme2024638_disclosures.pdf

Truth Seeker ID: 461088 Aug. 1, 2020, 12:29 p.m. No.4016   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3642

 

Maybe this is why they are skipping "animal trials" for COVID vaccines. They are specifically trying to alter "HUMAN" DNA to perhaps speed up human evolution to parallel the technocracy agenda. In that respect, "animal trials" would be a waste of resources. Just a theory.

Truth Seeker ID: 461088 ADEPT : PROTECT : DARPA : MODERNA Aug. 1, 2020, 1:18 p.m. No.4017   🗄️.is 🔗kun

DARPA pioneered the use of the body as a bioreactor to produce prophylactic antibodies to protect against biothreats.

 

THE DARPA SOLUTION (an excerpt from the article)

 

In 2012 with the ADEPT:PROTECT program*, DARPA began investing in the development of gene-encoded vaccines, a new category of preventive measures based on DNA or RNA. In this approach, genes that encode immune stimulating antigens, such as the spike proteins on the surfaces of viruses like the one (SARS-CoV-2) that causes COVID-19, are delivered directly to a recipient’s body. There, the instructions carried in the DNA or RNA elicit the body’s own cells to manufacture the antigenic viral protein, which, in turn, elicits an immune response to the virus.

 

Gene-based vaccines have shown great promise as a means to provide safe, reproducible, long-term immune protection. For vaccines to work, however, they often require more than one dose and it often takes weeks to months before a recipient’s immune system builds up sufficient protection against the vaccine’s viral target.

 

With these biomedical realities come threats to warfighters if they deploy to pathogen-rife regions before having established relevant immunity and threats to military missions due to delayed deployment of personnel until they achieve immune protection.

 

For a vaccine to confer immunity, it must lead to the production within a recipient of highly potent antibodies that can neutralize the pathogen. DARPA initiated the ADEPT:PROTECT program (most often referred to more simply as ADEPT) with the intention of bushwhacking a novel pathway to near-immediate protection against pathogens for which vaccines are not yet available and to confer interim-term protection during the development of a vaccine, WHICH CAN TAKE YEARS.

 

THE IMPACT

 

DARPA’s investments in this space led directly, with the biotechnology firm Moderna as a contracted performer on the program, to a first-ever human clinical trial with an RNA vaccine in 2019. Earlier proof-of-concept experiments funded under ADEPT primarily with 6.1 funding (for basic research) demonstrated that delivery of antibodymaking instructions — by way of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), or another genetic-information-carrying tactic that relies on small viruses known as adenovirus-associated viruses (AAVs) — led to the production of antibodies that conferred protection in test animals exposed to the mosquito-borne Chikungunya (ChikV) virus.

 

Moderna subsequently used company funding to conduct a Phase I clinical trial with 22 healthy volunteers using an mRNA-encoded ChikV antibody. This marked the first safety demonstration of an RNA-based medical countermeasure. Moderna reported these promising results of its clinical study in 2019. The trial demonstrated platform safety as well as the ability to generate protective levels of functional antibody in humans.

 

In response to COVID-19, Moderna in March 2020 initiated human trials of gene-encoded antibodies that target SARS-CoV-2. Research by Moderna and other ADEPT performers has provided proof-of-concept results that simultaneously delivering gene-encoded antibody treatment and vaccine confers the recipient with immediate immune protection while a long-term immune response develops.

 

ADEPT investments also were foundational to an ambitious followon DARPA program, the Pandemic Prevention Platform (P3). Its goal is to prevent pandemic outbreaks by creating a platform capable of identifying, testing, and mass-producing MCMs within 60 days of the detection of an outbreak. The emergence of COVID-19 in late 2019 and its pandemic spread in 2020 reinforced the importance of ADEPT and P3 in the most forceful of terms possible. P3 is part of a yet more comprehensive portfolio of DARPA programs that stand a chance of ultimately delivering a technology framework that could quash just about any outbreak of a known or emerging infectious disease before it

could grow into a pandemic.

 

https://www.darpa.mil/attachments/ADEPTVignetteFINAL.pdf

Truth Seeker ID: ca1d2a Let’s create our own #OperationWarpSpeed Aug. 1, 2020, 2:10 p.m. No.4020   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4039

>>2089

 

https://www.fda.gov/media/97321/download

page 12

 

d. No Alternatives

 

For FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the

candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition. A potential

alternative product may be considered “unavailable” if there are insufficient supplies of the

approved alternative to fully meet the emergency need. A potential alternative product may be

considered "inadequate" if, for example, there are contraindicating data for special circumstances

or populations (e.g., children, immunocompromised individuals, or individuals with a drug

allergy), if a dosage form of an approved product is inappropriate for use in a special population

(e.g., a tablet for individuals who cannot swallow pills), or if the agent is or may be resistant to

approved and available alternative products.

 

https://twitter.com/BusyDrT/status/1289613782222696449

 

https://www.fda.gov/media/97321/download

Truth Seeker ID: 80e944 Aug. 2, 2020, 2:17 p.m. No.4063   🗄️.is 🔗kun

"Dr. Fauci’s daughter is software engineer at Twitter. Wonder why people have gotten banned for sharing about HCQ and other successful treatments for Covid?"

 

"Confirmed. Dr. #Fauci daughter Ali Fauci is a software engineer at Twitter amd been there at least since 2017 from what I found.

Sources:

  • https://nationalfile.com/faucis-daughter-ali-fauci-is-a-software-engineer-for-twitter/

  • https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/authors.fauciforthewin.html

  • https://web.archive.org/web/20171205024557/https://mobile.twitter.com/fauciforthewin

  • High Quality: http://imgur.com/a/clvDqa7

 

https://twitter.com/cjtruth/status/1290003570696257536

 

https://twitter.com/RealGeneralCaos/status/1289974562633981953

Truth Seeker ID: 234005 Aug. 3, 2020, 1:10 p.m. No.4117   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10171555

 

From Fort Benning to Japan and Hawaii, face masks are not working

 

Even following protocols in the military didn't stop the coronavirus from spreading

 

One will not find a greater degree of compliance to a mask mandate than with one placed on military trainees by drill sergeants. That's why, if masks are really the viral placebo their devoted cult worshipers make them out to be, one would expect mask mandates to work wonders in these environments. Except, they didn't work – just like they didn't work in Japan, Hawaii, Israel, California, Miami, or any other place where they've shown near universal compliance for months, yet the virus spread rapidly.

 

In the military, they don't just virtue signal and wear masks as a symbol. If they are led to believe mask-wearing will work to stop the spread, they will wear them seriously with the boot of the drill sergeant behind them. Yet, despite universal mask wearing, the super social distance rituals, and all precautions imaginable, it failed to stop an outbreak at Fort Benning in Georgia in May.

 

Here's how the outbreak unfolded, according to Elizabeth Howe of Connecting Vets. About 640 recruits from the 30th AG Battalion and 2nd Battalion, 29th Infantry Regiment arrived at Fort Benning in May for training and were immediately tested for COVID-19. Four recruits tested positive and were removed from the group while the remaining soldiers were placed in isolation for 14 days without any training exercises. After the 14-day quarantine, they were all retested and every single one was negative.

 

Only then did the training commence – with the full panoply of obsessive social distancing measures, including mask wearing. You can imagine that there will never be greater compliance to these rules than during military training. Yet, just eight days later, after one recruit exhibited symptoms, 142 of the trainees tested positive. That is 22% of the entire group isolated and quarantined together. As they were young, none of them were hospitalized and most were asymptomatic.

 

The case of Fort Benning should have served as a harbinger of what was to come in June with the surge of cases throughout the country, and now, the entire world. You cannot run or hide from God's respiratory viruses that spread as ubiquitously as the flu. However, at the same time, we see God's mercy – that the majority of cases are asymptomatic and there are very few serious cases outside of those who are immunocompromised.

 

More

 

https://www.theblaze.com/horowitz-from-fort-benning-to-japan-and-hawaii-face-masks-are-not-working

Truth Seeker ID: 7fa699 Aug. 3, 2020, 2:06 p.m. No.4124   🗄️.is 🔗kun

MODERNA CMO SELLS SHARES AS FINAL VACCINE TRIALS BEGIN, RAISING CONCERNS

 

CEO Stéphane Bancel has also cashed out on shares in recent months.

 

As Moderna begins a late-stage trial of its coronavirus vaccine, chief medical officer Tal Zaks sold almost all his shares in the company, according to a report filed to the US Securities and Exchange Commission, raising concerns about his trust in the vaccine, according to Globes.

 

While Zaks and other Moderna officials have already been cashing out on shares for the past few months, they've increased the sales of shares since reports were published on a successful test of the vaccine earlier in July.

 

In general, when stakeholders believe in their product, they increase their shares in order to increase confidence in the market. The move by Moderna officials to do the opposite raised concerns about the company, especially considering that Zaks, who sold almost all of his shares, is on the scientific side of the company, according to Globes.

 

Zaks still has tens of thousands of dollars worth of options in the company.

CEO Stéphane Bancel has also cashed out on shares in recent months.

Share sales by CEO Stéphane Bancel, his children's’ trust and companies he owns amount to about $21 million between January 1 and June 26.

 

Seven executive-compensation experts told Reuters that share liquidations by Moderna executives show the incentives biotech executives have to highlight development milestones, even for drugs that often don't get approved or sold. Such optimistic statements could cause investors to overpay for company shares or create false hope concerning a possible coronavirus vaccine.

 

“This may be their one shot at making a boatload of money if the vaccine doesn’t work out,” said Jesse Fried, a Harvard Law School professor who wrote a book about executive compensation, adding that Moderna’s chiefs have a powerful motivation to “keep the stock price up.”

 

Reuters has not found evidence that Bancel, Zaks or Moderna have exaggerated the company’s vaccine progress.

 

Uncertainty remains concerning how effective a vaccine will be in fighting the coronavirus, as it is still unclear how long one can remain immune to the virus.

Moderna launched a 30,000-subject trial of a COVID-19 vaccine that could clear the way for regulatory approval and widespread use by the end of this year, the company said last week.

 

The trial is one of the first late-stage studies supported by the Trump administration's effort to speed development of measures against the novel coronavirus, adding to hope that an effective vaccine will help end the pandemic.

Reuters contributed to this report.

 

https://www.jpost.com/international/moderna-cmo-sells-shares-as-final-vaccine-trials-begin-raising-concerns-637166

Truth Seeker ID: aa42c5 Aug. 6, 2020, 9:42 a.m. No.4329   🗄️.is 🔗kun

California spent millions on arena hospital that saw only 9 patients

 

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Doctors arrived at an arena-turned-medical center in Sacramento in mid-April and were told to prepare for 30 to 60 coronavirus patients to arrive within days. They spent the weekend working feverishly to get ready.

 

State officials envisioned the cavernous Sleep Train Arena and an adjoining facility as a place where hundreds of patients could be treated, but in the first week just one arrived. The pace never increased, and the 250 assembled medical workers — physicians, nurses, pharmacists and administrative staff — found themselves wondering what to do.

 

“People began to question within themselves whether they were really needed or not," said Dr. Charles Moore, a retired internal medicine physician who worked there for about six weeks. “There were no plans for what would happen if you gave a party and no one came."

 

Ultimately, just nine patients arrived over 10 weeks. The cost to care for them was a staggering $12 million.

 

The Sacramento site was one of 15 temporary medical facilities set up around California in anticipation of a surge of cases that never materialized. It shut down on July 1, as did most others.

 

But as virus cases started rising again around California in June, the state decided to keep some open and take lessons from Sleep Train to run them more efficiently.

 

Kim Brown Sims, the arena's chief nursing office, wrote a training manual the state could use across its facilities. She also recommended the state either create its own electronic record system to use at every site or partner with local hospitals to use their systems, rather than requiring facilities to create their own paper systems, something the doctors had been asked to do that first weekend at Sleep Train.

 

Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security focused on pandemic preparedness, said California wasn't alone in preparing for a New York City-like flood of cases that would overwhelm hospitals.

 

“Many places just went very fast because they were scared and they had the ability to do it so they did it, not really thinking about how they were going to make all the pieces fit together and integrate with the existing health care system and deliver efficient care," he said.

 

Moving forward, he said when deciding whether to open alternate care sites California officials should use regional infection rates and hospitalizations to set staffing so the sites don't have too many doctors and not enough patients.

 

Brian Ferguson, a spokesman for the state Office of Emergency Services, acknowledged the state didn't use local data when fist setting up field sites.

 

“I think in hindsight we would certainly make sure that we would do some things similar again, but perhaps be more thoughtful about how fast we ramp up or have more off ramps," he said.

 

However, Ferguson said the state benefits from having staff who have been trained to work at such facilities and established procedures for running the sites.

 

“Having those folks trained, having these sites available will continue to be a value," he said.

 

Sleep Train Arena was the site of an April 6 news conference by Gov. Gavin Newsom, who hailed the facility as a prime example of California's rapid preparedness. It and a nearby building, both owned by the NBA's Sacramento Kings, would house 400 beds and take people discharged from hospitals or be the first stop for people with mild to moderate virus symptoms, he said.

 

Newsom didn't mention the state was paying the Kings to rent and provide services, a cost of $1 million over two months. The state spent another $7 million on mechanical, electrical, plumbing and other improvements, according to the Department of General Services.

 

The state also spent at least $2.8 million on staff, nearly $500,000 on personal protective equipment and about $1 million on other expenses.

 

More

 

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/state-spent-millions-arena-hospital-051926789.html

Truth Seeker ID: 2fcb07 Aug. 6, 2020, 12:41 p.m. No.4344   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10202281

>https://truthinmedia.com/study-hydr0xychl0r0qulne-death-rate-half/

>NEW STUDY SHOWS HYDR0XYCHL0R0QUINE CUTS COVID DEATH RATE IN HALF

 

https://youtu.be/S8xUgX5ciqg

Truth Seeker ID: 716c60 Aug. 8, 2020, 8:32 a.m. No.4404   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.technocracy.news/association-of-american-physicians-and-surgeons-sounds-off-on-face-masks/

 

Association Of American Physicians And Surgeons Sounds Off On Face Masks

 

Posted By: Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D. via AAPS July 30, 2020

 

The AAPS, a national association of doctors founded in 1943, accurately delineates the physics and dynamics of face masks. Any government official that mandates the wearing of masks to prevent the spread of COVID-19 is acting in complete defiance of proven scientific facts. ⁃ TN Editor

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2

 

Note: A COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) particle is 0.125 micrometers (μm); influenza virus size is 0.08 – 0.12 μm; a human hair is about 150 μm.

 

*1 nm = 0.001 micron; 1000 nm = 1 micron; Micrometer (μm) is the preferred name for micron (an older term)

 

1 meter is = 1,000,000,000 nm or 1,000,000 microns

 

Droplets

 

Virus is transmitted through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs, sneezes or talks. Larger respiratory droplets (>5 μm) remain in the air for only a short time and travel only short distances, generally <1 meter. They fall to the ground quickly. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30245-9/fulltext

This idea guides the CDC’s advice to maintain at least a 6-foot distance.

Virus-laden small (<5 μm) aerosolized droplets can remain in the air for at least 3 hours and travel long distances. https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMc2004973?articleTools=true

 

Air currents

 

In air conditioned environment these large droplets may travel farther.

However, ventilation — even the opening of an entrance door and a small window can dilute the number of small droplets to one half after 30 seconds. (This study looked at droplets from uninfected persons). This is clinically relevant because poorly ventilated and populated spaces, like public transport and nursing homes, have high SARS-CoV-2 disease transmission despite physical distancing. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30245-9/fulltext

 

Objects and surfaces

 

Person to person touching

The CDC’s most recent statement regarding contracting COVID-19 from touching surfaces: “Based on data from lab studies on Covid-19 and what we know about similar respiratory diseases, it may be possible that a person can get Covid-19 by touching a surface or object that has the virus on it and then touching their own mouth, nose or possibly their eyes,” the agency wrote. “But this isn’t thought to be the main way the virus spreads. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/s0522-cdc-updates-covid-transmission.html.

 

Chinese study with data taken from swabs on surfaces around the hospital

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-0885_article?deliveryName=USCDC_333-DM25707

 

The surfaces where tested with the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, which greatly amplifies the viral genetic material if it is present. That material is detectable when a person is actively infected. This is thought to be the most reliable test.

Computer mouse (ICU 6/8, 75%; General ward (GW) 1/5, 20%)

Trash cans (ICU 3/5, 60%; GW 0/8)

Sickbed handrails (ICU 6/14, 42.9%; GW 0/12)

Doorknobs (GW 1/12, 8.3%)

81.3% of the miscellaneous personal items were positive:

Exercise equipment

Medical equipment (spirometer, pulse oximeter, nasal cannula)

PC and iPads

Reading glasses

Cellular phones (83.3% positive for viral RNA)

Remote controls for in-room TVs (64.7% percent positive)

Toilets (81.0% positive)

Room surfaces (80.4% of all sampled)

Bedside tables and bed rails (75.0%)

Window ledges (81.8%)

Plastic: up to 2-3 days

Stainless Steel: up to 2-3 days

Cardboard: up to 1 day

Copper: up to 4 hours

Floor – gravity causes droplets to fall to the floor. Half of ICU workers all had virus on the bottoms of their shoes

 

Filter Efficiency and Fit

 

*Data from a University of Illinois at Chicago review

 

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data

 

HEPA (high efficiency particulate air) filters – 99.97 – 100% efficient. HEPA filters are tested with particles that are 0.125 μm.

Masks and respirators work by collecting particles through several physical mechanisms, including diffusion (small particles) and interception and impaction (large particles)

N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) are constructed from electret (a dielectric material that has a quasi-permanent electric charge. An electret generates internal and external electric fields so the filter material has electrostatic attraction for additional collection of all particle sizes. As flow increases, particles will be collected less efficiently.

N95 – A properly fitted N95 will block 95% of tiny air particles down to 0.3 μm from reaching the wearer’s face. https://www.honeywell.com/en-us/newsroom/news/2020/03/n95-masks-explained.

But even these have problems: many have exhalation valve for easier breathing and less moisture inside the mask.

Surgical masks are designed to protect patients from a surgeon’s respiratory droplets, aren’t effective at blocking particles smaller than 100 μm. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:VLXWeZBll7YJ:https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/957730O/respirators-and-surgical-masks-contrast-technical-bulletin.pdf+&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Filter efficiency was measured across a wide range of small particle sizes (0.02 to 1 µm) at 33 and 99 L/min.

N95 respirators had efficiencies greater than 95% (as expected).

T-shirts had 10% efficiency,

Scarves 10% to 20%,

Cloth masks 10% to 30%,

Sweatshirts 20% to 40%, and

Towels 40%.

All of the cloth masks and materials had near zero efficiency at 0.3 µm, a particle size that easily penetrates into the lungs.

Another study evaluated 44 masks, respirators, and other materials with similar methods and small aerosols (0.08 and 0.22 µm).

N95 FFR filter efficiency was greater than 95%.

Medical masks – 55% efficiency

General masks – 38% and

Handkerchiefs – 2% (one layer) to 13% (four layers) efficiency.

Conclusion: Wearing masks will not reduce SARS-CoV-2.

N95 masks protect health care workers, but are not recommended for source control transmission.

Surgical masks are better than cloth but not very efficient at preventing emissions from infected patients.

Cloth masks will be ineffective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, whether worn as source control or as personal protective equipment (PPE).

 

“Masks may confuse that message and give people a false sense of security. If masks had been the solution in Asia, shouldn’t they have stopped the pandemic before it spread elsewhere?”

 

*The first randomized controlled trial of cloth masks. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

 

Penetration of cloth masks by particles was 97% and medical masks 44%, 3M Vflex 9105 N95 (0.1%), 3M 9320 N95 (<0.01%).

Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.

The virus may survive on the surface of the face- masks

Self-contamination through repeated use and improper doffing is possible. A contaminated cloth mask may transfer pathogen from the mask to the bare hands of the wearer.

Cloth masks should not be recommended for health care workers, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated.

 

*A study of 4 patients in South Korea

 

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342

 

Known patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 wore masks and coughed into a Petrie dish. “Both surgical and cotton masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS–CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19 to the environment and external mask surface.”

 

*Singapore Study – Few people used mask correctly

 

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/publichealth/86601

 

Overall, data were collected from 714 men and women. About half the sample were women and all adult ages were represented. Only 90 participants (12.6%, 95% CI 10.3%-15.3%) passed the visual mask fit test. About three-quarters performed strap placement incorrectly, 61% left a “visible gap between the mask and skin,” and about 60% didn’t tighten the nose-clip.

 

*A 2011 randomized Australian clinical trial of standard medical/surgical masks

 

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00198.x?fbclid=IwAR3kRYVYDKb0aR-su9_me9_vY6a8KVR4HZ17J2A_80f_fXUABRQdhQlc8Wo

 

Medical masks offered no protection at all from influenza.

Conclusions from Organizations

 

The World Health Organization (WHO):

 

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331693/WHO-2019-nCov-IPC_Masks-2020.3-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

 

“Advice to decision makers on the use of masks for healthy people in community settings

 

As described above, the wide use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not supported by current evidence and carries uncertainties and critical risks.”

 

“Medical masks should be reserved for health care workers. The use of medical masks in the community may create a false sense of security, with neglect of other essential measures, such as hand hygiene practices and physical distancing, and may lead to touching the face under the masks and under the eyes, result in unnecessary costs, and take masks away from those in health care who need them most, especially when masks are in short supply.”

 

“Masks are effective only when used in combination with frequent hand-cleaning with alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water.”

 

WHO acknowledges that most people do not use masks properly.

 

Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the Center for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases:

 

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/t0131-2019-novel-coronavirus.html

 

“We don’t routinely recommend the use of face masks by the public to prevent respiratory illness,” said on January 31. “And we certainly are not recommending that at this time for this new virus.”

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

 

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/infectioncontrol/maskguidance.htm

 

In March 5, 2019 regarding the flu: “Masks are not usually recommended in non-healthcare settings; however, this guidance provides other strategies for limiting the spread of influenza viruses in the community:

 

cover their nose and mouth when coughing or sneezing,

use tissues to contain respiratory secretions and, after use, to dispose of them in the nearest waste receptacle, and

perform hand hygiene (e.g., handwashing with non-antimicrobial soap and water, and alcohol-based hand rub if soap and water are not available) after having contact with respiratory secretions and contaminated objects/materials.

 

From the New England Journal of Medicine

 

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372

 

“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”

Final Thoughts

 

Surgical masks – loose fitting. They are designed to protect the patient from the doctors’ respiratory droplets. The wearer is not protected from others airborne particles

People do not wear masks properly. Most people have the mask under the nose. The wearer does not have glasses on and the eyes are a portal of entry.

The designer masks and scarves offer minimal protection – they give a false sense of security to both the wearer and those around the wearer.

**Not to mention they add a perverse lightheartedness to the situation.

If you are walking alone, no mask – avoid folks – that is common sense.

Remember – children under 2 should not wear masks – accidental suffocation and difficulty breathing in some

If wearing a mask makes people go out and get Vitamin D – go for it. In the 1918 flu pandemic people who went outside did better. Early reports are showing people with COVID-19 with low Vitamin D do worse than those with normal levels. Perhaps that is why shut-ins do so poorly. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.08.20058578v4

 

If you are sick, stay home!

 

Additional Resource: Healthy People Wearing Masks, Should They or Shouldn’t They? This ER nurse with over two decades of experience took a deep dive into the science to find out: https://jennifermargulis.net/healthy-people-wearing-masks-during-covid19/

Truth Seeker ID: 6b21a0 Aug. 8, 2020, 11:28 a.m. No.4408   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.kgw.com/article/news/investigations/questions-over-the-accuracy-of-how-the-state-tracks-covid-deaths/283-0b1b7b6c-695e-4313-92cf-a4cfd7510721

 

Are dying with COVID-19 and dying from COVID-19 the same thing? In Oregon, they are

 

A KGW investigation raises questions over how the state of Oregon tracks COVID-19 deaths.

 

 

Are dying with COVID-19 and dying from COVID-19 the same thing? In Oregon, they are

A KGW investigation raises questions over how the state of Oregon tracks COVID-19 deaths.

Author: Cristin Severance

Published: 5:16 PM PDT August 7, 2020

Updated: 10:02 AM PDT August 8, 2020

 

PORTLAND, Ore. — Fred Creasy was diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer at the end of June. Doctors gave the 81-year-old just 30 days to live. He died at the end of July while in hospice care at Avamere Rehabilitation Facility in Newport.

 

“They told my daughter you better come down here because it's going to be today. And within five hours he was gone,” said daughter Rhonda McCrary.

 

McCrary said her father tested positive for COVID-19 around the same time of his cancer diagnosis.

 

“He had no symptoms. He wasn't even quarantined,” said McCrary.

 

McCrary said her dad died from advanced cancer and Avamere considered Creasy recovered from the coronavirus. A few days after his death, Lincoln County Public Health reported Creasy as the county’s ninth COVID-19 death.

 

“I mean, that’s not what he died from. He died from colon cancer, not COVID and places are listing loved ones as COVID deaths. And they're labeling that and it's just not true,” said McCrary.

 

McCrary said Creasy died with COVID-19, not from COVID-19, and there’s obviously a difference.

Credit: Rhonda McCrary

Fred Creasy

 

Other families across Oregon are also questioning why their loved ones are being counted as COVID-19 deaths, including the family of a 26-year-old Oregon man who was listed as a COVID-19 death but tested negative for the virus.

 

RELATED: A 26-year-old Oregon man died after testing negative for COVID-19. Now his family wants answers

 

According to the Oregon Health Authority (OHA), there is no difference when it comes to tracking and reporting COVID deaths. OHA spokesman Jonathan Modie explained in an email how the state determines what is counted as a COVID-19 death:

 

We consider COVID-19 deaths to be:

 

Deaths in which a patient hospitalized for any reason within 14 days of a positive COVID-19 test result dies in the hospital or within the 60 days following discharge.

 

Deaths in which COVID-19 is listed as a primary or contributing cause of death on a death certificate.

 

We count COVID-19 deaths this way because the virus can often have effects on an individual’s health that may complicate their recovery from other diseases and conditions, even injuries, and indirectly contribute to their death. Another reason is because OHA is using this data to track the spread of the disease, and to create actionable steps for stopping its spread.

 

So what does that policy mean in practice? We asked Modie about a hypothetical case where someone died from a motorcycle crash and also had COVID-19. Would that be counted as a COVID-19 death?

 

“It would be,” Modie explained. “But I must go back to the point about how we used this data, which is to help us track how COVID-19 is spread in the community.”

 

He added that the state follows the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for reporting deaths.

 

Epidemiologists like Dr. Carlos Crespo with the PSU/OHSU School of Medicine said, with the exception of a crash or gunshot wound, this is not a misleading way to report data because COVID-19 does exasperate other health problems.

 

“So, all of these chronic diseases that normally you might not die from, but the fact that you contracted COVID-19 put you over the edge,” said Dr. Crespo.

 

Dr. Payal Kohli, KGW’s medical expert, agrees. She explained a principle in medicine that states the simplest explanation is most likely the correct one.

 

“So, if you want to be very conservative, then the right thing to do is anyone who tests positive for COVID and died, gets hospitalized, or has a bad outcome, you want to say that's from COVID,” said Dr. Kohli.

 

Dr. Kohli also pointed out the downside of tracking and reporting deaths this way. She said ultimately you’re not counting deaths as accurately as you could be. That could bolster to the theory that hospitals and facilities are doing this for financial gain.

 

“A lot of people are saying that hospitals may be doing this in a cynical fashion to try to get more money because they're being reimbursed according to how many COVID deaths we have. But I think in totality, we are underestimating the number of COVID deaths,” Dr. Kohli said. “The CDC has said that for every one case that we've diagnosed, there's likely ten out there that we haven't diagnosed,” said Dr. Kohli.

 

The Oregon Health Authority does not receive federal funds based on COVID-19 deaths.

 

Some facilities may receive some money based on Medicare reimbursement but it’s important to note Oregon has had less than 400 deaths since March. That’s far less than the hundreds of deaths per day reported by states like Florida, so the financial incentive theory isn’t as relevant in Oregon.

 

Colorado previously reported deaths the same way Oregon does. State health officials were counting people who died from COVID-19 and with COVID-19 as the same thing. But after public outcry, the state changed how they reported coronavirus deaths to differentiate between people who died from COVID-19 and people who died with COVID-19.

 

“As a clinician and as a physician, that kind of classification makes a lot more sense to me because then we've got more granularity on the data and we know exactly who is directly related to COVID, whereas who may have just died while being infected with COVID,” said Dr. Kohli.

 

Dr. Kohli said with less the 400 deaths in Oregon, it wouldn’t be difficult for health officials to separate the deaths into two categories.

 

“Yes, this becomes more challenging when the number of cases go goes up. But if you have 386 deaths, it is much more straightforward to try to classify who died with COVID and who died as a direct result,” said Dr. Kohli.

 

Oregon has reported 348 deaths so far during the pandemic. The Oregon Health Authority has no plans to change their system or separate deaths into two different categories.

 

“I just think if somebody goes; you get hit, you're in a motorcycle accident. You died from injuries from a motorcycle accident, not COVID,” said McCrary.

Truth Seeker ID: aa42c5 Aug. 8, 2020, 6:20 p.m. No.4423   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Kansas health secretary used misleading charts to push mask mandate

 

The secretary for the Kansas Department of Health and Education is facing criticism for using a misleading chart while advocating for a statewide mask mandate. Secretary Lee Norman gave a speech earlier this week detailing the difference in coronavirus cases between Kansas counties with a mask mandate and counties without one. According to a report from the Sentinel, Norman used an axis with a range of 15 to 25 to describe the number of new cases in masked counties and used a range of 4 to 14 to describe the number of new cases in counties without a mask mandate, making it appear as though counties without a mask mandate had more cases. When the two sets of data are placed on a chart with the same axis, counties without a mask mandate have fewer new cases per day than counties with a mask mandate. Norman told reporters that counties with a mask mandate were "winning the battle" against the coronavirus. "All of the improvement in the case development comes from those counties wearing masks," he said.

 

Michael Austin, the director of the Center for Entrepreneurial Government, accused Norman of knowingly misleading the public. The center is part of the Kansas Policy Institute, which owns the Sentinel. "At a time when the public needs government to provide sound conclusions with accurate information, it’s unfortunate the Kansas Health Secretary knowingly deceived the public into justifying his narrative," Austin said. Kansas House Majority Leader Dan Hawkins, a Republican, similarly criticized Norman. Norman was appointed to his position by Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.

 

"Gov. Kelly and her administration have failed Kansans time and again, but manipulating data to intentionally deceive the entire state is a new low," Hawkins said. "Tens of thousands of Kansans have lost their jobs and businesses as a direct result of Gov. Kelly’s politics-first response to the COVID pandemic, and these individuals struggling to make ends meet deserve to know the truth. It is reprehensible for a public servant like Dr. Norman that we trusted to protect our health and safety in a nonpartisan way to intentionally spread misinformation. The Kelly administration has lost all credibility," he added. The Washington Examiner has reached out to the Kansas Department of Health and Education for comment. Fifteen counties in Kansas followed Kelly's request for a mask mandate, and the remaining 90 counties in the state did not.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/kansas-health-secretary-used-misleading-charts-to-push-mask-mandate

 

KDHE doctored a COVID case chart to justify mask mandates

 

https://sentinelksmo.org/kdhe-doctored-a-covid-case-chart-to-justify-mask-mandates/

Truth Seeker ID: 10ea52 Aug. 12, 2020, 10:16 p.m. No.4525   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Harvey Risch, M.D., Ph.D., professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health: "Hydroxychloroquine works in high-risk patients, and saying otherwise is dangerous"

 

I can only speculate about the cause of the FDA’s recalcitrance. Hydroxychloroquine is an inexpensive, generic medication. Unlike certain profit-generating, patented medications, which have been promiscuously touted on the slimmest of evidence, hydroxychloroquine has no natural financial constituency. No one will get rich from it.

 

Further, it seems quite possible that the FDA, a third of whose funding comes from drug companies, is under intense pressure from those companies to be extremely conservative in its handling of hydroxychloroquine. If hydroxychloroquine is used widely and comes to be recognized as highly effective, the markets for expensive and patented COVID-19 medications, including intravenous drugs that can only be used in the hospital, will shrink substantially.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/hydroxychloroquine-works-in-high-risk-patients-and-saying-otherwise-is-dangerous

!!Y5QggE1eXQ ID: 7b31a3 Aug. 13, 2020, 5:16 a.m. No.4526   🗄️.is 🔗kun

UN-Linked Biotech Expert Claims COVID-19 is Man-Made Bioweapon From Chinese Military Lab

 

https://thenationalpulse.com/news/un-expert-says-covid-19-bioweapon/

 

https://archive.is/LvzeN

Truth Seeker ID: 10ea52 Aug. 13, 2020, 10:13 a.m. No.4536   🗄️.is 🔗kun

PROOF MASKS DON'T WORK

 

Dr. Orr was a surgeon in the Severalls Surgical Unit in Colchester. And for six months, from March through August 1980, the surgeons and staff in that unit decided to see what would happen if they did not wear masks during surgeries. They wore no masks for six months, and compared the rate of surgical wound infections from March through August 1980 with the rate of wound infections from March through August of the previous four years. And they discovered, to their amazement, that when nobody wore masks during surgeries, the rate of wound infections was less than half what it was when everyone wore masks. Their conclusion: “It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all” and that wearing a mask during surgery “is a standard procedure that could be abandoned.”

 

https://archive.is/z1Yi8

Truth Seeker ID: 751512 Aug. 13, 2020, 8:37 p.m. No.4560   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10281364

This is an image of the back label on a PolymeraseChainReaction (PCR) test kit currently in widespread use at hospitals around the country.

Truth Seeker ID: 751512 #CovidKnowingly Aug. 14, 2020, 5:25 p.m. No.4590   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10291154

 

Steve Scalise: New York Families Asked Me to Get Coronavirus Data Hidden by Andrew Cuomo

 

Rep. Steve Scalise (D-LA) said New York families who had loved ones die from coronavirus are contacting his office for help obtaining information from Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) related to nursing home deaths, offering his comments on Friday’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Daily with host Alex Marlow.

 

Cuomo neglected to use assets made available to him by the Trump administration as part of New York’s coronavirus response, explained Seema Verma, administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Verma also noted that Cuomo and other Democrat governors issued coronavirus-related directives contrary to federal government guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

 

“Just in New York, over 2,500 seniors died that should not have died if those [CDC] guidelines were followed,” said Scalise, referring to Cuomo’s policy of placing coronavirus-infected seniors into nursing homes. “So we’ve been trying to get the full data. It’s almost like [Cuomo] is proudly saying, ‘I don’t have to give you the data.’ This is a guy who used to give press conferences for hours at a time talking about transparency and honesty, and he has the data, and he’s bragging that he doesn’t have to show us what really happened in his state.”

 

Scalise said, “I’ve got more families in New York that have contacted my office telling us to keep fighting to get this data, because they lost loved ones. They lost their moms. They lost their grandparents, and the governor of their own state won’t even tell them what happened and why, because he’s trying to cover this up.”

 

New York’s true nursing home death toll cloaked in secrecy,” wrote the Associated Press on Tuesday:

 

New York’s coronavirus death toll in nursing homes, already among the highest in the nation, could actually be a significant undercount. Unlike every other state with major outbreaks, New York only counts residents who died on nursing home property and not those who were transported to hospitals and died there.

 

That statistic could add thousands to the state’s official care home death toll of just over 6,600. But so far the administration of Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo has refused to divulge the number, leading to speculation the state is manipulating the figures to make it appear it is doing better than other states and to make a tragic situation less dire.

 

Cuomo dismissed calls for an independent inquiry of what took place in New York’s nursing home’s a “political” pursuit to undermine him.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2020/08/14/steve-scalise-new-york-families-asked-me-get-coronavirus-data-hidden-andrew-cuomo/

Truth Seeker ID: fcb18d Aug. 15, 2020, 1:50 p.m. No.4653   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4654

(H)CQ and radiation sickness patent.

 

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20050014785A1/en

 

The methods described herein generally involve the administration of effective amounts ofchloroquine compounds and/or chloroquine like compounds for the treatment and/ore prevention of DNA damage related disorders. The term “DNA damage related disorders” include, but are not limited to, cancer, aging, disorders caused by damage to DNA due to exposure to carcinogens, toxins, free radicals, like oxygen radical, or DNA damaging radiations like ionizing radiation and UV radiation. The chloroquine compounds are also useful for prevention of tissue injury resulting from ischemia, such as that which occurs following myocardial infarction or stroke. The effects of the chloroquine compounds used in the methods described herein include systemic, local, and topical effects. It is preferred that the effects of the chloroquine compounds in the methods described herein are systemic.

 

[0031]

 

In one embodiment, the chloroquine compounds are used as prophylactics to prevent DNA damage related disorders. The chloroquine compounds are useful in the prevention of cancers caused by toxins, carcinogens, DNA damaging radiations, and/or genetic mutations. For example, chloroquine compounds are useful in the prevention of cancers caused by exposure to toxins and carcinogens like aromatic hydrocarbons, cigarette smoke, acetyl amino fluorine, MTBE, etc. Also, chloroquine compounds are useful in prevention of cancers caused by DNA damaging radiations like UV and ionizing radiation. The ionizing radiations includes both natural and therapeutic radiation exposures. Examples of ionizing radiations are X-rays for diagnostics and radiation therapy used for tumors and unintended exposure to radiation as an act of terrorism or war. …

Truth Seeker ID: fcb18d Aug. 15, 2020, 1:59 p.m. No.4654   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4653

Status = "abandoned".

Have to read the claims at the end to see what the patent application really covered.

Typically a patent application gets abandoned if the applicant can't prove it's patentable for various reasons during the back-and-forth prosecution process with the patent office.

Truth Seeker ID: 0cbe94 CNN False Advertising Aug. 16, 2020, 5:34 p.m. No.4667   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2089

 

Saw this clip about a CNN advertisement, which was part of one of Mark Dice's videos.

 

CNN should be sued big time for making this statement without a scintilla of evidence to back up their statement.

 

https://videos.utahgunexchange.com/watch/the-celebrities-are-here-to-help-masks_T9dB9eFUD43wM2Y.html

Truth Seeker ID: fcb18d COVID Health Information Aug. 16, 2020, 8:24 p.m. No.4670   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10313913

 

COVID Health Information

 

The Center for Infectious Medicine in Sweden and ~25 contributory doctors and scientists have published an extraordinary paper affirming “robust t-cell immunity” after mild exposure to coronavirus, blasting the whispers of potential resurgence. Happy to share the paper if desired.

 

New York yesterday had five fatalities (the entire state, not just the city). The positivity rate on testing is 0.83%, what statistician call “the same thing as zero.” Interestingly testing is still going up, which a part of me hopes is just because asymptomatic people are getting super duper sure they are clear as school and post-Labor Day work life draws closer.

 

With all of the talk of New York (because of its role in March/April’s peak level of distress) and the FACT states (because of the summer increase in cases), has led to many other geographies being somewhat ignored. Massachusetts General Hospital has 1,000 inpatient beds. 14 are currently being used for COVID patients, 1 in ICU – (one). There are two hospitalizations right now in suburban Cook County, IL.

 

The quadrant here is back for a day (it came Friday) but the chief economist at the firm who creates it is on a two-week vacation so just did this as a one-off. As he points out, total cases actually collapsing everywhere, and would show as much even more dramatically if it weren’t for California’s inexplicable data issues last week. That reporting backlog “catch-ups” pollute present data is perhaps one of the major events of all this I am most mortified by – simply no excuse for it in a country as modernized and capable as ours.

 

To present as clear and succinct of a summary as possible for everyone:

 

Cases are way down (though that is not very important to our national health or economic well-being)

 

Positivity ratio is way down

 

Hospitalizations are way down (down 10% week-over-week; down 20% last two weeks)

 

Mortalities are way down (down 9% week-over-week)

 

https://thebahnsengroup.com/covid-and-markets/daily-covid-markets-missive-weekend-edition-august-16/

Truth Seeker ID: fcb18d Aug. 17, 2020, 7:19 a.m. No.4679   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10317412

 

https://www.khou.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/texass-record-high-covid-positivity-rate-falls-after-data-experts-investigate/287-ffc19167-0d47-4be9-8c06-8648229288ef?

 

CORONAVIRUS

 

Texas officials say record-high COVID-19 positivity rate was caused by coding errors, system upgrades

The state says coding errors from two labs and a system upgrade on Aug. 1 caused an artificial 24.5% positivity rate. The rate dropped to 16% Thursday and Friday.

 

by Teresa Woodard, August 14, 2020

 

DALLAS — Gov. Greg Abbott said Thursday the Texas Department of State Health Services had brought in a “data team” to determine why the positivity rate of COVID-19 tests spiked to record levels in the first two weeks of August, reaching 24.5% on Wednesday.

 

The positivity rate is the percentage of COVID tests that come back positive. The higher the percentage, the more alarming to public health experts.

 

Abbott has previously said he would consider a positivity rate of above 10% a red flag for spread of the coronavirus in Texas.

 

When he announced the reopening of Texas in late April, after a month-long shutdown of many businesses, the positivity rate was around 5%.

 

It steadily increased from mid-June through mid-July, reaching a high of 17.4% on July 16, then decreasing to 12% by the end of the month.

 

But on August 1, the positivity rate began a rapid two-week ascent.

 

DSHS press officer Lara Anton said the data experts discovered that a computer upgrade performed Aug. 1 meant multiple positives were uploaded to the state’s lab reporting system.

 

The data experts also discovered coding errors from one hospital lab and one commercial lab in the state.

 

Once those errors were resolved, tests from those sites were uploaded.

 

The resulting artificially high positivity rate could have been troubling for businesses.

 

Abbott said Thursday the positivity rate needed to “go back below 10% for a sustained period of time,” before he would consider reopening additional businesses.

 

The positivity rate fell to 16% Thursday and remained there on Friday.

 

The governor also said a decrease in demand for testing across the state has impacted the positivity rate.

 

When only people who feel sick are getting tested, the percentage of positives is likely to be higher.

 

According to Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins, most testing sites in the county are seeing fewer people.

 

He said Eastfield College is averaging about 200 tests per day – far below its 500-test capacity.

 

Capacity at Ellis Davis Field House is 1,000 per day and that hasn’t been met in a while, Jenkins said.

 

Dallas County Director of Health and Human Services Dr. Phillip Huang said he’s not surprised by data processing issues being experienced by public health tracking systems.

 

“We are still dealing with paper faxes of lab data and lab reports - hundreds of those a day that we’re having to deal with,” Huang said.

 

“The systems have not really been designed to handle this many numbers,” he said. “It’s an unprecedented situation we’re dealing with.”

 

According to Anton, the state expects the positivity rate to “generally be higher until testing demand increases and the backlog of cases smooth out.”

 

She did not give a timeline for when that might happen.

 

Huang said it is important to focus on trends from multiple data points, like hospitalizations and ER visits as well as the positivity rate.

 

“Data shows us what’s going on in our community - the spread, which populations it is affecting, what geographic areas are being most affected - all those things rely on the data,” he said.

 

“There’s not going to be perfect data, but we need to get as good clean data as we can.”

Truth Seeker ID: 324897 Aug. 26, 2020, 6:34 a.m. No.4936   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10424884

 

What is Gilead’s role in the war on Hydroxychloroquine?

 

Is Gilead, the maker of Remdesivir, waging war on HCQ (hydroxychloroquine)? Attacks on the drug have been continuous ever since Dr. Didier Raoult used this quinine derivative to save the lives of COVID-19 patients last March. The first attempt to discredit HCQ was a hastily compiled Veterans Administration hospital system study last April. Notably, one of the study’s authors had in the past received numerous grants from Gilead, with one grant in 2018 totaling nearly a quarter of a million dollars.

After deep flaws in the VA study were exposed, Surgisphere came to the rescue in May with a “15,000 patient” megastudy allegedly compiled from hospitals all over the world. This strategy succeeded: Following its publication in the Lancet and the NEJM, all outpatient use of HCQ was severely restricted in the U.S., Australia, and most of Europe.

When the Surgisphere scam was exposed, both articles were quietly retracted and the editor-in-chief of the Lancet tried to wash his hands of this embarrassing incident by denouncing Surgisphere’s “monumental fraud.” However only a few days earlier, Lancet editors played a major role in persuading WHO to suspend all trials for HCQ. Who put them up to it?

The study’s main author, Mandeep Mehra, also apologized for his reliance on a third party for the data. He may not have known the data was fabricated, but the hospital he directed was conducting two trials for Remdesivir. Was he under pressure from his sponsors?

These are the stakes: A five-day treatment with Remdesivir costs around $3,000. A five-day supply of generic HCQ costs around $10. Drug companies have every right to recoup their cost of research and development, but lobbying to suppress access to a lifesaving treatment that is both cheaper and more effective is a crime against humanity.

Progressives mistakenly believe that socialized medicine protects patients from the abuses of big pharma, but the first nation to severely restrict access to HCQ was France. This policy compelled Dr. Raoult to testify against Gilead’s disproportionate leverage over the medical community during a meeting of the French National Assembly last June.

Notably in the U.S., a third of the FDA’s budget comes from pharmaceutical user fees, and according to the NIH’s website, eight out of 55 members of the panel responsible for COVID-19 treatment guidelines are currently affiliated with Gilead. These government ties to Gilead more than triple when you include panel members with past associations.

Paradoxically, most opposition to HCQ in the U.S. comes from the left, but conservatives who know the ways of crony capitalism regard this as par for the course. After all, big pharma has given more to Democrats ever since the passage of Obamacare and up to now, Gilead employees donated three times more to the Biden campaign.

Sooner or later there will be a reckoning for everyone who colluded in this disinformation campaign.If you are among the policymakers or physicians participating in this charade, you may want to dissociate yourself while you can credibly plead ignorance for tens of thousands of preventable deaths

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/08/what_is_gileads_role_in_the_war_on_hydroxychloroquine.html

Truth Seeker ID: 751512 Aug. 26, 2020, 3:36 p.m. No.4956   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10429150

 

New studies show risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and death decreases with hydroxychloroquine use

 

The drug has been politicized in the US

 

Two recent studies support the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 that can reduce the chance of hospitalization or death, refuting narratives in the media that the drug is dangerous and being pushed by President Donald Trump for political reasons.

Hydroxychloroquine is a relatively cheap and readily available drug that has been used for decades to treat malaria. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, doctors around the world have vouched for positive results seen in patients who take it.

What do the studies say?

A study out of Italy found that HCQ reduces by 30% the risk of death for COVID-19 patients who are hospitalized. The result comes from an observational study of more than 3,400 COVID-19 patients in 33 Italian hospitals.

"We observed that patients treated with hydroxychloroquine had a 30% lower in-hospital mortality rate compared to those not receiving this treatment," said Augusto Di Castelnuovo, epidemiologist at the Neuromed Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, currently at Mediterranea Cardiocentro in Naples. "Our data were subjected to extremely rigorous statistical analysis, taking into account all the variables and possible confounding factors that could come into play. The drug efficacy was evaluated in various subgroups of patients. The positive results of hydroxychloroquine treatment remained unchanged, especially in those patients showing a more evident inflammatory state at the moment of admission to hospital."

Another study, which looked at outpatient cases in New Jersey, found that a prescription of hydroxychloroquine reduced the risk of hospitalization by 47%. Because the study was conducted early in the pandemic, when mostly only symptomatic people were being tested, researchers believe their sample of more than 1,200 patients represents people with relatively more advanced cases of COVID-19.

The study concluded that hydroxychloroquine can be effective when given early after a COVID-19 diagnosis, and the study found there was no increase in negative side effects for people who took the drug. One concern about HCQ has been the potential for it to cause heart problems in some patients.

 

https://www.theblaze.com/news/new-studies-hcq-covid-hospitalizations-deaths

Truth Seeker ID: 10ea52 Aug. 28, 2020, 10:31 a.m. No.5006   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Things like this certainly call the data into question!

 

>>>/qresearch/10452947

 

Texas County Drops From 4600+ Active Covid Cases to Under 100 After Audit

 

https://ussanews.com/News1/2020/08/27/texas-county-drops-from-4600-active-covid-cases-to-under-100-after-audit/

 

Earlier this month, Collin Co.’s ‘Covid-19 Dashboard’ claimed over 4600 active cases in the county based on data provided by the Texas Dept. of State Health Services, prompting county officials to question the accuracy of the data because, presumably, the county’s hospitals weren’t overloaded.

Truth Seeker ID: 10ea52 Aug. 29, 2020, 4:51 p.m. No.5083   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>>/qresearch/10465759

 

https://twitter.com/littllemel/status/1299791452105474057

 

“This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded actually died from Covid

 

That's 9,210 deaths

 

The other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses & the overwhelming majority were of very advanced age”

 

https://facebook.com/1566405890/posts/10224050038749877/?extid=gr0T716wo2v3tjFm&d=n

 

https://www.facebook.com/1566405890/posts/10224050038749877/?extid=gr0T716wo2v3tjFm&d=n

 

“This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded actually died from Covid

 

That's 9,210 deaths

 

The other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses & the overwhelming majority were of very advanced age”

 

https://facebook.com/1566405890/posts/10224050038749877/?extid=gr0T716wo2v3tjFm&d=n

Truth Seeker ID: 054d92 Sept. 2, 2020, 8:39 p.m. No.5231   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5324 >>5732

Two anons at this house believe this is exactly right and IMPORTANT.

 

Written by an anon on QR >>>/qresearch/10511191

 

President Trump. I love you, but, listen up. YOU can NOT let this happen. IT WILL be civil war. Lets not go there.

 

>CDC tells states to be ready to distribute potential COVID-19 vaccine by Nov. 1

 

YOU better get in front of this, and fast.

 

THIS vaccine forced upon the population is totally unacceptable. TOTALLY. And if forced upon the populations, (who are threatened with loss of their jobs for refusing it) will end in violence that will make Antifa look like a walk in the park.

 

Being an employee is ONE thing.

 

It might include a policy (not law) requiring a uniform etc.

 

NEVER does it allow a corporation to permanently alter a person bodily. They do NOT get to make permanent changes to your body, as if you are a slave that they own. PERIOD. ESPECIALLY NOT FOR PROFITS SAKE and by CORPORATE POLICY.

 

They TRIED to do this in the 90's.

 

Corporations are NOTHING but fictitious people.

 

Remember that.

 

As a person I have NO right to march over to my neighbor and tell him I get to inject him with whatever I think is best, against his will.

 

I do not get to claim that right because my neighbor mows my lawn or works for me. Employment is NOT OWNERSHIP of a SLAVE.

 

What. They get to tattoo us next?

 

Perhaps they claim the right to force us to tattoo their LOGOS on our foreheads????

 

They would BRAND us like CATTLE?????

 

Really.

 

A permanent change to the bodies immune system without consent of the person is still a permanent change. DO NOT allow corporations to turn our first responders, nurses, doctors into "chattel"… legal term for a THING, OWNED.

 

Talk about reinstating SLAVERY.

 

People do not have this power to force a tattoo, a branding, a vaccine or any other PERMANENT bodily change on another against their will. NEVER.

 

This is battery.

 

It is a CRIME.

 

When the government behaves like a criminal, it WILL be treated like one.

 

Same with corporations… of ANY KIND.

 

Any hospital administrators who attempt to force this on their employees need to be sued for physical battery by persons refusing the shot, and threatened with the loss of their jobs because of it.

 

Go after their homes anons.

 

Sue any school boards for practicing medicine without a license.

 

GET THEM, and MAKE THEM PAY.

 

Sue the bastards personally, all of them.

 

Sue every damn person who threatens you with a needles full of God knows what. Every damn one. Go after their homes. Go after their bank accounts in civil law suits. Go after the Governors, the Mayors, and yes, if they EVER got stupid enough to try to use the military, get your guns.

 

The answer here is a DEAD STOP NO.

 

No.

 

I'll die on this one.

 

BIG LINE. Willing to go to my maker on it.

 

If I feel this way, can imagine MANY DO, since I would NEVER pick up a gun over a political issue.

 

I would call this a matter of self defense.

 

Corporations are not allowed to BRAND employees like they own them. WE the PEOPLE are NOT the property of the US government or ANY GOVERNMENT.

 

We are NOT the property of the corporations we work for. NOT.

 

Tell the UN to take a fucking hike, or figure on being shoved into the ocean.

 

Because people have the right to QUIT, change jobs and have the right to decide what permanent changes are made to their bodies. Slavery and ownership of the body of another person for the sake of using them for profit is against the law.

 

I Hope the nations governors are listening.

 

Antifa is a joke compared to this.

 

I am a person who would NEVER pick up a gun over a political issue.

 

This is NOT a political issue.

 

I KNOW that any attempt to send the military around to force this vaccine on people because they work for some "medical" company will cause our medical and first responders to quit their jobs.

 

Any attempt to send people door to door will end in the death of the people sent.

 

There is a line that can not be crossed.

 

The "SHOT" heard around the world?????

 

>CDC tells states to be ready to distribute potential COVID-19 vaccine by Nov. 1

Truth Seeker ID: 131700 Sept. 4, 2020, 7:54 a.m. No.5251   🗄️.is 🔗kun

UCLA, STANFORD study finds for average 50-64 year old, chances of dying from COVID-19 are 1 in 19.1 million!!!

 

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.06.20124446v2

 

Abstract

 

Abstract Objective: Our objective is to demonstrate a method to estimate the probability of a laboratory confirmed COVID19 infection, hospitalization, and death arising from a contact with an individual of unknown infection status. Methods: We calculate the probability of a confirmed infection, hospitalization, and death resulting from a county-level person-contact using available data on current case incidence, secondary attack rates, infectious periods, asymptomatic infections, and ratios of confirmed infections to hospitalizations and fatalities. Results: Among US counties with populations greater than 500,000 people, during the week ending June 13,2020, the median estimate of the county level probability of a confirmed infection is 1 infection in 40,500 person contacts (Range: 10,100 to 586,000). For a 50 to 64 year-old individual, the median estimate of the county level probability of a hospitalization is 1 in 709,000 person contacts (Range: 177,000 to 10,200,000) and the median estimate of the county level probability of a fatality is 1 in 6,670,000 person contacts (Range 1,680,000 to 97,600.000). Conclusions and Relevance: Estimates of the individual probabilities of COVID19 infection, hospitalization and death vary widely but may not align with public risk perceptions. Systematically collected and publicly reported data on infection incidence by, for example, the setting of exposure, type of residence and occupation would allow more precise estimates of probabilities than possible with currently available public data. Calculation of secondary attack rates by setting and better measures of the prevalence of seropositivity would further improve those estimates.

Truth Seeker ID: 131700 Sept. 5, 2020, 12:42 p.m. No.5324   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5231

And yet this is the flip side.

If/when a vaccine is pushed to the public, HOW are we to know whether it's bogus, or necessary protection against, perhaps, something new/incoming, something old that we all have that actually needs treatment, or whatnot?

This hypothesis is the only one I've seen so far that could explain WHY President Trump keeps talking about a necessary vaccine and promoting it like it's a good thing.

Have had this hypothesis in mind all along, but now other anons are saying it out loud.

 

HOW ARE WE TO KNOW? Put something foreign into our body based on TRUST? At this point, trust in the medical establishment is at an all-time low.

 

>>>/qresearch/10538680

>>>/qresearch/10538833

>>>/qresearch/10538850

Let's see who paying attention:

Has anyone specifically heard Trump say anything about this upcoming vaccine (to be revealed in the next 50 days or so) which specifically states that it is intended to target COVID-19? Again, has Trump stated in explicit wording that this vaccine to be released is a "COVID-19" vaccine?

Or did Trump just talk about a vaccine and everyone is assuming this vaccine is targeting COVID-19?

Consider the implications.

What other vaccine has Trump talked about?

>Yep. I've noticed that. He says a vaccine, but not what the vaccine is for. I've been wondering if it is a vaccine for a virus that they have not yet release.

>>Yep. I've noticed that. He says a vaccine, but not what the vaccine is for. I've been wondering if it is a vaccine for a virus that they have not yet release.

>AIDS.

>More specifically, immunodeficiency caused by <n> vectors.

>If so, this undoes 50-100 years of medical malpractice and poisoning food+water?

>What would send 99% of the people to the hospital?

>Truth?

>MIL dispatched to distribute?

>Activated almonds.

Truth Seeker ID: 131700 Sept. 5, 2020, 3:05 p.m. No.5327   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Covid-19 tests may be detecting traces of DEAD virus, giving ‘false positives’ and EXAGGERATING pandemic – research

 

New research has discovered that coronavirus tests may be finding dead traces from weeks-old infections, resulting in false positives that inflate the scale of the pandemic.

 

The study was carried out by experts from the University of Oxford’s Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and the University of the West of England. It found there was a risk of “false positives” because of how Covid-19 testing is being conducted.

 

The scientists discovered that, despite people with Covid-19 being infectious for only around a week, one test used to detect the disease can still give a positive reading weeks after the patient has recovered.

 

The team examined 25 studies on the widely used polymerase chain reaction test, which is used to determine if someone has the virus in their system. The test takes a sample from a suspected Covid-19 case and uses a process that increases the amount of DNA, or genetic material, in the sample, to enable it to be examined.

 

The research found that the tests can amplify coronavirus genetic material that is not a viable virus and no longer capable of causing an infection.

 

Professor Carl Heneghan, one of the authors of the study, said there was a risk that a surge in testing across the UK was increasing the risk of this sample contamination occurring and it may explain why the number of Covid-19 cases is rising but the number of deaths is static.

 

“Evidence is mounting that a good proportion of ‘new’ mild cases and people re-testing positives after quarantine or discharge from hospital are not infectious, but are simply clearing harmless virus particles which their immune system has efficiently dealt with,” he wrote in The Spectator magazine.

 

Professor Heneghan said an “international effort” was required to avoid “the dangers of isolating non-infectious people or whole communities”.

 

https://www.rt.com/news/499944-coronavirus-test-dead-false-positive-exaggerate-pandemic/

Truth Seeker ID: 99d36e Sept. 20, 2020, 8:11 a.m. No.5471   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This is why some anons don't trust vaccines

 

>>>/qresearch/10720537

Bombshell: After finding of hundreds of cancer genes in MMR vaccines, FDA researcher admits viral cells in vaccines may “activate” genes and spread more disease

11/13/2019

https://www.newstarget.com/2019-11-13-fda-admits-vaccines-may-spread-more-disease.html

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 Sept. 23, 2020, 5:13 p.m. No.5535   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5536

Adam Creighton

@Adam_Creighton

The US govt last week updated the survival rates (i.e., IF infected) for Covid19:

 

0-19 99.997%

20-49 99.98%

50-69 99.5%

70+ 94.6%

 

Didn't see it reported much.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

CDC provides credible COVID-19 health information to the U.S.

cdc.gov

 

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 Sept. 23, 2020, 6:25 p.m. No.5536   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5535

Here are the survival rates for Influenza 2018-2019:

 

5-17 = 99.998% (Same as COVID

18-49 = 99.8% (Worse than COVID)

50-64 = 99.4% (Worse than COVID)

65+ = 99.17 (Better than COVID)

 

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2018-2019.html

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 Sept. 24, 2020, 1:31 p.m. No.5560   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Flashback: 2015 Pfizer Vice President Blows The Whistle & Tells The Truth About The Pharmaceutical Industry

 

Below is a clip taken from the “One More Girl” documentary, a film regarding the Gardasil vaccine, which was designed to prevent Human Papillomavirus. In it, Dr. Peter Rost, MD, a former vice president of one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world (Pfizer), shares the truth about the ties between the medical and pharmaceutical industry.

 

Rost is a former vice president of Pfizer, and a whistleblower of the entire pharmaceutical industry in general. He is the author of “The Whistleblower, Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman.” Considering his work experience, it would be an understatement to say that he is an insider expert on big pharma marketing.

 

Below is a clip taken from the “One More Girl” documentary, a film regarding the Gardasil vaccine, which was designed to prevent Human Papillomavirus. In it, Dr. Peter Rost, MD, a former vice president of one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world (Pfizer), shares the truth about the ties between the medical and pharmaceutical industry.

 

Rost is a former vice president of Pfizer, and a whistleblower of the entire pharmaceutical industry in general. He is the author of “The Whistleblower, Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman.” Considering his work experience, it would be an understatement to say that he is an insider expert on big pharma marketing.

 

→ Help Support CE: Become a member of CETV and get access to exclusive news and courses to help empower you to become an effective changemaker. Also, help us beat censorship! Click here to join.

 

Below are a couple of quotes from both a former and a current editor-in-chief of the two largest, and what are considered to be the most credible, medical journals in the world. It’s only fitting to include them into the article as they are directly related to what Dr. Rost hints at in the video.

 

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.” – Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime editor-in-chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ) (source)

 

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” – Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet – considered to be one of the most well respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world. (source)

 

https://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/07/07/pfizer-vice-president-blows-the-whistle-tells-the-truth-about-the-pharmaceutical-industry/

 

https://youtu.be/TrCizlAOBAo

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 Sept. 25, 2020, 9:32 a.m. No.5600   🗄️.is 🔗kun

COVID-19 Deaths Per Million

March 15 - Sept 22, 2020

By Country

 

Comparing No HCQ Usage (higher death rates)

versus

HCQ Usage (much lower death rates)

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 Sept. 25, 2020, 11:02 a.m. No.5602   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Coronavirus Testing Suspended at Boston Lab Due to Nearly 400 False Positives

 

False positives with coronavirus testing are being reported so often that it makes you wonder how many ARE NOT being reported.

Unfortunately, this hasn’t stopped testing or the introduction and marketing of new testing kits or any of the COVID-19 mandates being opposed by American doctors as well as citizens and people worldwide. It also hasn’t stopped invasive and sometimes harmful screening procedures (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).

            • -

From NBCNews:

Coronavirus testing at Boston lab suspended after nearly 400 false positives

 

An investigation by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health found that there were at least 383 erroneous positive results.

A Boston lab suspended coronavirus testing after an investigation uncovered nearly 400 false positive COVID-19 results.

Orig3n, a biotechnology company which counts dozens of nursing homes as its clients, ceased testing on Aug. 8 at the request of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. The suspension came days after state health officials became aware of an unusually high number of positive coronavirus tests.

An investigation found that there were at least 383 inaccurate positive results from the lab that, upon re-testing, came back as negative.

On Aug. 27, the MDPH said it notified Orig3n they had been cited with “three significant certification deficiencies that put patients at immediate risk of harm.”

“The Boston lab is required to respond with a written plan of correction, and if action is not taken it can face sanctions,” a health department spokesperson said in a statement to NBC News on Wednesday.

The health department said roughly 60 nursing homes either still are or have been clients of Orig3n.

 

https://www.activistpost.com/2020/09/coronavirus-testing-suspended-at-boston-lab-due-to-nearly-400-false-positives.html

Truth Seeker ID: 76f381 Oct. 2, 2020, 1:52 p.m. No.5818   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19313647?via%3Dihub

 

Influenza vaccination and respiratory virus interference among Department of Defense personnel during the 2017–2018 influenza season

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 Oct. 4, 2020, 5:26 a.m. No.5868   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5869

Allegations that 5G wireless, particularly ~60 GHz (5G can be deployed on various different parts of the high frequency EM spectrum), cause or contribute to illness, have been floating around since before the COVID-19 situation. These allegations have surfaced again. The theory has loudly vocal proponents and equally loud detractors. The theory states that 60 GHz radiation reduces the absorption of oxygen in the lungs.

 

  • It is noteworthy that the US government has banned Chinese wireless manufacturer Huawei from US markets and tried to persuade allies to reject the gear.

  • President Trump has said that we need a domestic 5G, 5G is a good thing, but we don't want China's 5G. The initial assumption was that this statement related to potential spying by China CCP through Huawei. This is a legitimate suspicion. However it completely ignores the allegation that 5G might be dangerous or weaponized to harm human biology.

  • During the COVID lockdown it has been alleged that 5G antennas have been installed surreptitiously at schools and other places.

Of similar concern is the constellation of wireless satellites launched by Elon Musk. If radiation at 60 GHz is potentially harmful, why would we acquiesce to being bathed in it from above?

  • Some have characterized COVID-19 as a binary weapon system involving molecules delivered into the body by a pathogen, PLUS their activation by 5G wireless radiation. It was stated that 5G had been deployed at Wuhan, China just prior to the COVID-19 outbreak. It was also stated that 5G was deployed in Italy (?and elsewhere in Europe?) prior to COVID-19 outbreaks there. It may or may not be a red herring. This hypothesis urgently needs investigation.

  • Another theory states that metals have been introduced into human bodies via (1) aluminum adjuvants in vaccines (2) chemtrails dispersing microscopic particles of aluminum, barium, etc. into the environment which are then ingested and inhaled, and take up long-term residence in the human body. Not only are these metals toxic, but in the presence of certian radio frequency radiation (at specific frequencies and power levels) the metals would magnify energy absorption into the human body, producing disease symptoms. Mercury in dental amalgam fillings and as a preservative (thimerosal) in vaccines has also been fingered in this process. This hypothesis also needs investigation.

-I suspect, but cannot prove, that wireless radiation could also be used in a beneficial manner to reverse illness or block adverse EM. Could that be one reason why President Trump has pushed for America to deploy domestically designed/manufactured 5G gear and install it widely?

 

I'm no medical expert and I don't want to be an alarmist, but it's time to address these theories and either confirm them, or put them to rest.

 

I'm not sure COVID-19 General is the right place to post this either.

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 Oct. 4, 2020, 5:30 a.m. No.5869   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5868

Some factual info about the frequencies on which 5G wireless services can or will be deployed. These vary by country.

 

https://www.everythingrf.com/community/5g-frequency-bands

 

Feb 16, 2018

There has been a lot of talk about the frequency spectrum that 5G technology will use. With the first 5G-NR standard officially announced, network operators all over the world are conducting trials with the objective to deploy the technology commercially sometime in the next 2-3 years. Different countries have proposed and are working on different frequency bands that range all the way from 600 MHz to 71 GHz. In this article, we have outlined the proposed 5G Bands by country.

 

United States: The United State is leading the way in 5G R&D. At the lower end of the frequency spectrum they are using the 600 MHz (2 x 35 MHz) band, the 3100 - 3550 MHz band and the 3700 - 4200 MHz band. At the higher end of the frequency spectrum they are using the 27.5 – 28.35 GHz band and the 37 – 40 GHz band. Mobile operators in the US have already conducted trails in these frequency bands. The FCC has also opened up spectrum from 64 - 71 GHz for 5G use as well, however, there has not been too much activity in this frequency band yet. Click here to see US 5G spectrum allocations.

 

Europe: Countries in the EU are using both low and high frequency bands for the initial 5G trails. In the lower bands they are using the 3400 - 3800 MHz frequency band and in the higher frequency bands they are using the frequency band from 24.25 - 27.5 GHz. Click here to see country wise 5G spectrum allocations in Europe.

 

China: In China there are ongoing trials in the 3300 - 3600 MHz band with the possibility of the 4400 – 4500 MHz band and 4800 – 4990 MHz band also being used. At higher frequencies China is considering using the 24.25 – 27.5 GHz band and the 37 – 43.5 GHz band.

 

Japan: They are looking at using the frequency spectrum from 3600 - 4200 MHz and 4400 - 4900 MHz in the lower bands and the 27.5 – 28.28 GHz in the higher bands.

 

Korea: They were one of the first countries to start R&D on 5G Technology with the aim to launch it during the 2018 Olympic Winter Games in Feb, 2018. Though, they have not commercially launched this yet, they have made significant strides towards commercialization of the technology. They are currently conducting trials in the 26.5 – 29.5 GHz band.

 

We will continue to update this article as and when more bands are announced.

 

                  • -

 

Added by OP:

 

Note. It is important to use the correct units when discussing wireless spectrum allocation.

1 GHz (gigaherz) = 1000 MHz (megahertz).

 

1 GHz = 1,000,000,000 cycles per second

1 MHz = 1,000,000

1 kHz = 1,000

 

I read very ignorant discussions on the web where ill-informed people simply panic when they read the word "electromagnetic" or "frequency" or "EM radiation" or "wavelength" and use the terminology improperly to generate fear. These are not scary words, they are simply precise technical words used by physicists and engineers. Wavelength is the reciprocal of frequency.

Specific absorption of radiation (SAR) is a methodology used to characterize energy absorption by human tissue(s). Absorption varies by (1) frequency (2) power level (3) duty cycle (4) proximity (5) type of modulation. Also different tissues of the body absorb energy differently.''

Truth Seeker ID: 34de1e Oct. 5, 2020, 6:24 a.m. No.5894   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Bio-warfare experts question why Canada was sending lethal viruses to China

 

https://nationalpost.com/health/bio-warfare-experts-question-why-canada-was-sending-lethal-viruses-to-china

 

'I think the Chinese activities … are highly suspicious,' one expert said, after it was revealed a Winnipeg lab sent samples of Ebola and henipavirus to China~Aug. 2019

 

In a table-top pandemic exercise at Johns Hopkins University last year, a pathogen based on the emerging Nipah virus was released by fictional extremists, killing 150 million people.

 

A less apocalyptic scenario mapped out by a blue-ribbon U.S. panel envisioned Nipah being dispersed by terrorists and claiming over 6,000 American lives.

 

Scientists from Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) have also said the highly lethal bug is a potential bio-weapon.

 

But this March that same lab shipped samples of the henipavirus family and of Ebola to China, which has long been suspected of running a secretive biological warfare (BW) program.

 

China strongly denies it makes germ weapons, and Canadian officials say the shipment was part of its efforts to support public-health research worldwide. Sharing of such samples internationally is relatively standard practice.

 

But some experts are raising questions about the March transfer, which appears to be at the centre of a shadowy RCMP investigation and dismissal of a top scientist at the Winnipeg-based NML.

 

Dany Shoham, a biological and chemical warfare expert at Israel’s Bar-Ilan University. “I think the Chinese activities … are highly suspicious, in terms of exploring (at least) those viruses as BW agents. “

 

James Giordano, a neurology professor at Georgetown University and senior fellow in biowarfare at the U.S. Special Operations Command, said it’s worrisome on a few fronts.

 

China’s growing investment in bio-science, looser ethics around gene-editing and other cutting-edge technology and integration between government and academia raise the spectre of such pathogens being weaponized, he said.

 

That could mean an offensive agent, or a modified germ let loose by proxies, for which only China has the treatment or vaccine, said Giordano, co-head of Georgetown’s Brain Science and Global Law and Policy Program.

 

Asked if the possibility of the Canadian germs being diverted into a Chinese weapons program is connected to other upheaval at the microbiology lab, Public Health Agency of Canada spokeswoman Anna Maddison said this week the agency “continues to look into the administrative matter.”

 

But suspicions have persisted, with the U.S. State Department and other agencies stating publicly as recently as 2009 that they believe China has offensive biological agents.

 

Though no details have appeared in the open literature, China is “commonly considered to have an active biological warfare program,” says the Federation of American Scientists. An official with the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense charged last month China is the world leader in toxin “threats.”

 

In a 2015 academic paper, Shoham – of Bar-Ilan’s Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies – asserts that more than 40 Chinese facilities are involved in bio-weapon production.

 

China’s Academy of Military Medical Sciences actually developed an Ebola drug – called JK-05 — but little has been divulged about it or the defence facility’s possession of the virus, prompting speculation its Ebola cells are part of China’s bio-warfare arsenal, Shoham told the National Post.

 

Ebola is classified as a “category A” bioterrorism agent by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, meaning it could be easily transmitted from person to person, would result in high death rates and “might cause panic.” The CDC lists Nipah as a category C substance, a deadly emerging pathogen that could be engineered for mass dissemination.

 

Nipah, which was first seen in Malaysia in 1998, has caused a series of outbreaks across east and south Asia, with death rates mostly over 50 per cent, and as high as 100 per cent, according to World Health Organization figures. It can cause encephalitis, an often-fatal brain swelling, and has no known treatment or vaccine.

 

The Johns Hopkins exercise — called Clade X — involved a version of Nipah modified to be more easily passed between people. America’s Blue Ribbon Study Panel on Biodefence prefaced its 2015 report with a scenario involving the intentional release of Nipah by aerosol spray.

 

China’s extensive and controversial use of CRISPR gene-editing and related technology makes it conceivable the country could bio-engineer germs like Nipah to make them even more dangerous, Giordano said.

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 Oct. 5, 2020, 9:21 a.m. No.5895   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The following is a letter sent to Noxandfriends, from a biochemist, E.J.Ledet, who did some looking into Remdisivir.. We will let you make up your own mind on this without commenting…

 

Subject: Remdesivir is a ligand ionophore transporter of zinc

 

Comment: We believe that HCQ is in direct competition with Remdesivir and that Gilead, Big Pharma has put a lot of $$ pressure on MDs, Medical Journals, Press, Academia, NIH, CDC to discredit HCQ after 65 yrs of safe use as a malaria drug and 40 years of safe use to treat lupus and some forms of arthritis.

 

Gilead contributes $$$ to the income of 20% of NIH Board MDs and Fauci heads NIH. Gilead also funds a great deal of $$$ to Academia Medical research and $$ to Medical journal publishers. The ZInc15 Ligand database, a database containing 230 million zinc ligand/ionophores for sale as potential drugs to various pharmaceutical companies and has 750 million viewable zinc ionophores is funded by NIH of which Fauci is the head.

 

My recent sleuthing into Remdesivir using the Pharmacology Database and comparing homologue/analogue organic structure similarities for binding sites of zinc, show that Remdesivir is also a zinc ligand/ ionophore (carrier molecule). Gilead has not shared that information with the public but I’m quite sure that Gilead Pharmacology Chemist are very aware that Remdesivir is a ligand ionophore for zinc and can help transport zinc across cell membranes to interfere with viral RNA RdRp enzyme and prevent further virion reproduction just like its HCQ competitor. Gilead synthesized Remdesivir so that it mimics ATP which is critical for RNA reproduction . Since Remdesivir’s organic structure is slightly different from ATP, incorporation of its biological transformed homologue or its synthetic structure depicted below by the virus interrupts RNA transcription and produces pieces of viral RNA which can not be reassembled to make new viruses.

 

I believe that Gilead is not promoting/touting Remdesivir as a zinc ionophore because its afraid of losing out to HCQ which is one hundred times less expensive since its patent ran out many years ago and is currently produced in 12 different pharmacology labs in India.

 

Gilead has spent $ hundreds of millions in research/marketing/propaganda, and Gilead stands to lose $ Billions in sales as one 5 day treatment costs $2340.

 

I’m attaching a graphic which shows the chemical structures of zinc ionophores. Adenosine, ATP, Quercetin, HCQ, and Remdesivir. Zn is shown bound to Hydroxyl (OH) molecules which are present in every structure on the below Structures.

 

[dropbox link to picture which I posted]

 

Cost Comparison: Remdesivir $2340; HCQ $25-30; Quercetin $5.40

 

[dropbox link to 2nd picture which I posted]

 

E.J. Ledet

Biochemist

Bellingham WA

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 COVID Production Flow Oct. 7, 2020, 6:24 p.m. No.5929   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5931

Moved here from Medical Anon post that created a thread.

 

This was taken down as quickly as it was posted by the virologists but is available in some form elsewhere as an archive.i posted this flow chart for those who lack the background to understand the text of the white paper.i worked with the CDC during the 1990s and can confirm that the underlying science is rock solid.the virus was a manufactured biological weapon.

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 Oct. 10, 2020, 6:31 a.m. No.5955   🗄️.is 🔗kun

German Neurologist Warns Against Wearing Facemasks: [Oxygen Deprivation Causes Permanent Neurological Damage]

 

www.sott.net/article/442455-German-Neurologist-Warns-Against-Wearing-Facemasks-Oxygen-Deprivation-Causes-Permanent-Neurological-Damage

 

I do not wear a mask, I need my brain to think. I want to have a clear head when I deal with my patients, and not be in a carbon dioxide-induced anaesthesia.

 

There is no unfounded medical exemption from face masks because oxygen deprivation is dangerous for every single brain. It must be the free decision of every human being whether they want to wear a mask that is absolutely ineffective to protect themselves from a virus.

 

For children and adolescents, masks are an absolute no-no. Children and adolescents have an extremely active and adaptive immune system and they need a constant interaction with the microbiome of the Earth. Their brain is also incredibly active, as it is has so much to learn. The child's brain, or the youth's brain, is thirsting for oxygen. The more metabolically active the organ is, the more oxygen it requires. In children and adolescents every organ is metabolically active.

 

To deprive a child's or an adolescent's brain from oxygen, or to restrict it in any way, is not only dangerous to their health, it is absolutely criminal. Oxygen deficiency inhibits the development of the brain, and the damage that has taken place as a result CANNOT be reversed.

 

The child needs the brain to learn, and the brain needs oxygen to function. We don't need a clinical study for that. This is simple, indisputable physiology. Consciously and purposely induced oxygen deficiency is an absolutely deliberate health hazard, and an absolute medical contraindication.

Truth Seeker ID: c32519 CDC Study Finds Overwhelming Majority Of People Getting Coronavirus Wore Masks Oct. 12, 2020, 10:23 a.m. No.6020   🗄️.is 🔗kun

CDC Study Finds Overwhelming Majority Of People Getting Coronavirus Wore Masks

 

October 12, 2020 By Jordan Davidson

 

https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/12/cdc-study-finds-overwhelming-majority-of-people-getting-coronavirus-wore-masks/

 

A Centers for Disease Control report released in September shows that masks and face coverings are not effective in preventing the spread of COVID-19, even for those people who consistently wear them.

 

A study conducted in the United States in July found that when they compared 154 “case-patients,” who tested positive for COVID-19, to a control group of 160 participants from the same health care facility who were symptomatic but tested negative, over 70 percent of the case-patients were contaminated with the virus and fell ill despite “always” wearing a mask.

 

“In the 14 days before illness onset, 71% of case-patients and 74% of control participants reported always using cloth face coverings or other mask types when in public,” the report stated.

 

In addition, over 14 percent of the case-patients said they “often” wore a face covering and were still infected with the virus. The study also demonstrates that under 4 percent of the case-patients became sick with the virus even though they “never” wore a mask or face covering.

 

Despite over 70 percent of the case-patient participants’ efforts to follow CDC recommendations by committing to always wearing face coverings at “gatherings with ≤10 or >10 persons in a home; shopping; dining at a restaurant; going to an office setting, salon, gym, bar/coffee shop, or church/religious gathering; or using public transportation,” they still contracted the virus.

 

While the study notes that some of these people may have contracted the virus from the few moments that they removed their mask to eat or drink at “places that offer on-site eating or drinking,” the CDC concedes that there is no successful way to evaluate if that was the exact moment someone became exposed and contracted the virus.

 

“Characterization of community exposures can be difficult to assess when widespread transmission is occurring, especially from asymptomatic persons within inherently interconnected communities,” the report states.

 

In fact, the report suggests that “direction, ventilation, and intensity of airflow might affect virus transmission, even if social distancing measures and mask use are implemented according to current guidance.”

 

Despite this new scientific information, the CDC, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Dr. Anthony Fauci, and many political authorities are still encouraging people to wear masks. Many states and cities have even mandated masks, citing them as one of the main tools to “slow the spread” of coronavirus and keep case numbers in their area down.

 

CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield makes it as clear as he can: "This face mask is more guaranteed to protect me against COVID than when I take a COVID vaccine." pic.twitter.com/Ul0Ppj5qqv

 

— The Recount (@therecount) September 16, 2020

 

Jordan Davidson is a staff writer at The Federalist. She graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism.

Photo U.S. Army photo by Jason W. Edwards

Truth Seeker ID: 17835c Oct. 12, 2020, 2:41 p.m. No.6035   🗄️.is 🔗kun

CDC First Said Not to Wear Masks, Then to Wear Masks, Then Masks Were Better than Vaccines – Now New Evidence Shows Masks Don’t Work

 

Six months ago Dr. Robert Redfield told the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee that healthy people should not wear face masks.

Dr. Redfield even tweeted about it.

But like so much else coming from the completely ridiculous US medical elites they changed their mind a few weeks later.

A few weeks ago, Dr. Robert Redfield told the Senate Appropriations Committee that masks offer better protection from the COVID-19 China virus than a vaccine.

They changed their mind on that now too.

Does anyone else suspect they’re just making policy on the fly? What a bunch of quacks. We should not be listening to a thing these people say.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/cdc-first-said-not-wear-masks-wear-masks-masks-better-vaccines-now-new-evidence-shows-masks-dont-work/

Truth Seeker ID: 17835c Trump Says He Won't Force Americans To Take COVID-19 Vaccine Oct. 17, 2020, 4:49 p.m. No.6187   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Trump Says He Won't Force Americans To Take COVID-19 Vaccine

10/17/2020

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-says-he-wont-force-americans-take-covid-19-vaccine

 

It's not every day that President Trump outflanks his progressive critics on the issue of 'consent'.

 

But according to some recent comments from the president, skeptics worried about the prospect of mandatory vaccination orders in the US and in the UK have rallied to voice their opposition.

 

But if President Trump is reelected, Americans who are concerned about what some 'experts' have characterized as a 'rushed' approval process for the COVID-19 vaccine won't need to worry about being forced to accept the vaccine and vaccinate their children. Because President Trump says he will not issue a mandate requiring that individuals receive the coronavirus vaccine once one becomes widely available.

 

President Trump is making sure essential workers and all Americans will have access to a safe and effective coronavirus vaccine. pic.twitter.com/FSlnVDpGp8

— Trump War Room - Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) October 15, 2020

 

While Trump claimed that "essential workers" and "older people" would take priority, the president made a brief detour detour during the interview with Fox's Stuart Varney that he won't require vaccinations because "some people feel very strongly" about the issue, Trump said.

 

Bill Gates, who insists that everyone - all 7+ billion humans on the planet - must be vaccinated to completely stamp out the virus and reduce its incidence to "zero".

 

"I don’t believe I’d ever do a mandated vaccine,” the president told Fox’s Stuart Varney. “I just don’t think I would do that, where you have to have it, because there are some people who feel very strong about that whole situation," Trump said.

 

Polls suggest roughly 50% of Americans would decline to take a COVID-19 vaccine, regardless of the developer, due to concerns about the approval process, which Bill Gates himself once denounced as potentially corrupt, blaming President Trump's insistence on approving a vaccine before election day.

Truth Seeker ID: 17835c Oct. 18, 2020, 9:39 a.m. No.6200   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Report: COVID-19 used as pretext to crack down on internet freedom

 

Internet freedom has declined for the 10th consecutive year as governments around the world are using the coronavirus pandemic as a “cover” to expand online surveillance, crack down on dissent, and build new technological systems to control society, Freedom House says in a new report.

 

The Washington-based human rights watchdog’s annual Freedom Of The Net report, released on October 14, said the authorities in dozens of countries have cited COVID-19 “to justify expanded surveillance powers and the deployment of new technologies that were once seen as too intrusive.”

 

As a result, Internet freedom has worsened in 26 of the 65 countries covered by the report, while only 22 registered gains.

 

And just 20 percent of the estimated 3.8 billion people using the Internet live in countries with a free Internet, according to the democracy research group.

 

https://americanmilitarynews.com/2020/10/report-covid-19-used-as-pretext-to-crack-down-on-internet-freedom/

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 Oct. 21, 2020, 10:53 a.m. No.6241   🗄️.is 🔗kun

FL House of Representatives Report Shows More than 40% of Florida’s Covid-19 Deaths May Not Merit that Classification

 

A recent report in Florida shows that over 40% of the state’s Covid-19 deaths may not merit that classification.

 

According to Dr. Andrew Bostom at AndrewBostom.org a Florid House of Representatives report covered an investigation of the COVID-19 deaths reported in Florida:

 

The Florida House investigators stressed that “nearly 60% [8,058/13.920] of the [COVID-19] records classified by the Department of Health,” had “errors,” or were “recorded in a manner inconsistent with state and national guidance.” They also provided evidence, as noted earlier, that ~10% [1,256] of these alleged Covid-19 deaths were misclassified.

 

I maintain this latter ~10% estimate is far too conservative, and moreover, reflects compliance with the CDC’s April, 2020 Covid-19 death certificate coding guidelines which destroyed the logical firewall between Part 1 “specific cause” of, and Part 2 “contribution(s)” to, individual deaths. Accordingly, to these 1,256 records where Covid-19 is not even listed as the final cause of death, one could add the 175 listing non-Covid-19 immediate and underlying causes, 1,345 occurring in hospice care, and the [3,697-246=] 3451 that somehow classified Covid-19, alone, as both the immediate and underlying cause of death despite acknowledging contributing co-morbidities, or “conditions”. This aggregate mortality total indicates, plausibly, that up to 45% (6,227/13,920) of Florida’s death certificate recorded “Covid-19 deaths” may not merit that classification.

 

What a mess the US medical agencies placed the country as a result of the China coronavirus. The numbers make no sense and are over counted in Florida. No doubt the same has occurred across the nation.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/report-shows-40-floridas-covid-19-deaths-may-not-merit-classification/

Truth Seeker ID: 588ea0 Oct. 23, 2020, 7:41 a.m. No.6261   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Covid-19 study on mask-wearing efficacy rejected by journals as no one is ‘brave’ enough to publish results – Danish researchers

 

October 22, 2020

 

A large-scale study in Denmark that sought to determine if masks help stop the spread of Covid-19 has been rejected by several prestigious journals. The authors hinted that their findings were inconvenient to the status quo.

 

The Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, and the American Medical Association Journal all turned down the paper, Danish media reported on Thursday.

 

The study, which began in late April, involved 6,000 Danes, half of whom were asked to wear masks at all times in public places. The other half were selected as a control group and were instructed not to cover their faces. After a month, participants were tested for Covid-19 as well as for antibodies against the virus.

 

The study’s researchers have remained tight-lipped about their findings, but they’ve dropped plenty of clues that suggest it was the paper’s conclusion, not its methodology, that led to the journals’ rejections.

 

“We can’t start discussing what they are dissatisfied with. For if so, we must also explain what the study showed. And we do not want to discuss this until it has been published,” Christian Torp-Pedersen, professor and chief physician at the research department at North Zealand Hospital, told Denmark’s Berlingske daily.

 

Another member of the study’s team wrote in an email shared by former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson last week that their findings would be published “as soon as a journal is brave enough to accept the paper.”

 

https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1317875526997102594?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1317875526997102594%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3%2Ccontainerclick_0&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rt.com%2Fnews%2F504219-danish-mask-study-rejected-coronavirus%2F

Truth Seeker ID: 446cb7 Oct. 24, 2020, 12:19 p.m. No.6298   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Dr. Fauci Suggests a Federal Mask Mandate May Be Necessary

 

Dr. Anthony Fauci says it might be necessary for Washington to impose a mask mandate on all 50 states, given the worrisome rise in coronavirus cases across the U.S. Fauci made the remarks during an interview on CNN.

 

Previously Fauci had opposed a federal mask mandate as unworkable and unenforceable.

 

CNN:

 

Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has been urging Americans to use masks for months. “I have trust in the American people that if we put a strong emphasis on the importance of wearing masks, that we will come around and do that and get that percentage up above the relatively low percentage of people that are using masks,” Fauci said on July 21 on NPR’s Morning Edition.

 

But he has said before that he doesn’t think a federal law would be the way to go.

 

Earlier this month, a poll found 92 percent of Americans believing that wearing a mask was a good idea. But only about 60 percent wear one. Changing people’s minds about wearing a mask outdoors will be difficult as long as we’re getting mixed messages from public health professionals.

 

“I don’t like to be authoritarian from the federal government, but at the local level, if governors and others essentially mandate the use of masks when you have an outbreak, I think that would be very important,” Fauci told Alabama Sen. Doug Jones during a Facebook live event in July.

 

Until now.

 

“Well, if people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it,” Fauci told CNN’s Erin Burnett Friday.

 

The obvious difficulty in issuing a federal mask mandate is how to make it enforceable. Maybe we could take a page from the Chinese secret police playbook. It worked for them.

 

Fauci admits difficulty in enforcement but thinks if we all join hands (virtually) and dance around the maypole as one, everybody will be eager to comply — or something.

 

“There’s going to be a difficulty enforcing it, but if everyone agrees that this is something that’s important and they mandate it and everybody pulls together and says, you know, we’re going to mandate it but let’s just do it, I think that would be a great idea to have everybody do it uniformly,” he said.

 

Mayors and governors across the country have had mask mandates in place for months and yet we’re seeing a massive surge in positive test results. Citizens are ignoring social distancing rules and congregating in large numbers. And police officers are refusing to enforce the rules largely because they’ve got better things to do. Issuing a ticket that people are going to ignore anyway will not scare people into wearing a mask when they’re supposed to.

 

We locked down the country for two months, drained trillions of dollars from the economy, destroyed jobs, industry, and lives for what purpose? The coronavirus has roared back after cities and states reopened even slightly. Chicago and New York City have been essentially locked down since March. Their business and entertainment districts are ghost towns. Thousands of companies have been shuttered permanently.

 

All for what?

 

If the definition of crazy is to do the same thing over and over expecting different results each time, our public health establishment, politicians, and bureaucrats are 100 percent, certifiably nuts.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2020/10/24/dr-fauci-suggests-a-federal-mask-mandate-may-be-necessary-n1084251

Truth Seeker ID: 3584bb Nov. 1, 2020, 10:25 a.m. No.6503   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Only 6% of reported "covid deaths" are caused by covid alone, according to CDC.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#Comorbidities

 

For 94% of all deaths for which "covid" was certified as the cause of death, there were 2.6 additional causes of death.

Truth Seeker ID: a19c76 Nov. 9, 2020, 5 p.m. No.6685   🗄️.is 🔗kun

THIRD study finds that COVID-19 antibodies fade “very, very quickly,” rendering vaccine useless

 

The third such study in recent days to make this suggestion, a new paper published by researchers from Guy’s and St. Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust in London has determined that the antibodies developed after infection with the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) only last a very short time, meaning any future vaccine for the novel virus will be certifiably useless.

 

After analyzing the immune responses of patients and health care workers who became infected with the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), researchers from this institution found that the antibodies created to destroy the virus waned rather quickly, typically within just a few short weeks. After a couple of months, only 16.7 percent of patients still had any antibody response at all.

 

“The study found that 60 percent of the patients had a ‘potent’ antibody response at the peak of their battle with the coronavirus,” reports reveal. “After about two months, however, just 16.7 percent of the patients had a potent antibody response.”

 

These findings, along with those of earlier studies that reportedly came to similar conclusions, have drastic implications for the development of a vaccine for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). In essence, there will never be a vaccine good enough to combat the novel virus, no matter how “potent.”

 

“Not only do antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 fade, and perhaps fade quickly, studies have also shown that only 15 percent of those who test positive for antibodies make the neutralizing antibodies necessary to develop immunity in the first place,” says Dr. William Haseltine. “And not all of those who make neutralizing antibodies make them at high levels. Some of those infected make no antibodies at all.”

 

You will not want to miss the following episode of The Health Ranger Report with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, in which he talks with Dr. Paul Cottrell about how the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) is continuing to mutate, supposedly making it more contagious

 

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-11-09-study-finds-covid19-antibodies-fade-quickly-vaccine-useless.html

 

https://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/another-bombshell-a-3rd-study-has-now-found-that-covid-19-antibodies-disappear-very-very-rapidly

Truth Seeker ID: 7d9e55 Nov. 16, 2020, 3:25 p.m. No.6738   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6739

4:55 mins, worth your time

 

save offline

 

Video shows package insert of Covid 19 astra zeneca containing lung tissue 14-week aborted caucasian male fetus

 

4:38 mins. They seek AI software to process EXPECTED high volume of Covid19 vaccine ADVERSE Drug Reactions, ADRs

 

https://youtu.be/Ojfo5w7Ge_c

 

OP

 

C_19 Astra Zeneca va[cc]ine package insert

 

Do you really wanna put this in your veins?

 

“deriving lung tissue of a 14-week-old aborted Caucasian male fetus”

 

C_19 [A]stra [Z]eneca va[cc]ine package insert

 

https://twitter.com/LtlM55/status/1328313918150864896

 

https://youtu.be/Ojfo5w7Ge_c

Truth Seeker ID: 7d9e55 Nov. 16, 2020, 6:49 p.m. No.6742   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>Niacin—mechanistically established as safe, effective prophylactic and therapeutic antiviral treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—is experimentally confirmed to restore health overnight

 

Niacin is the "overnight cure?

 

In this double-blind placebo-controlled trial study, health was restored - and miraculously in a median of only 1.3 & by 2.3 days for all 100% (42 of 42) - of community dwelling adults w/ recently detected+ensuing #COVID19 randomly assigned to 1 g/day nicotinic acid intervention!

 

Niacin—mechanistically established as safe, effective prophylactic and therapeutic antiviral treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—is experimentally confirmed to restore health overnight. - Dmitry Kats, Ph.D., M.P.H.

 

https://gofile.io/d/TVaYAu

 

👆 Follow ACTUAL science!

 

https://twitter.com/3NTHALPY/status/1314041197804105730

https://twitter.com/3NTHALPY/status/1327098281432854532

https://twitter.com/3NTHALPY/status/1328389149452341249

Truth Seeker ID: 6c4eda Dec. 2, 2020, 10:31 a.m. No.6877   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Head of Pfizer Research: Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization

 

The vaccine contains a spike protein (see image) called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration.

 

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition

 

2020NEWS

 

On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).

 

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.

 

StarGate TV Series Warned Us In 2001 About the

 

Vaccination Disaster Facing Us Today

 

On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.

 

Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:

 

The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.

 

The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.

 

The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.

 

The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.

 

CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA.

 

https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/12/02/head-of-pfizer-research-covid-vaccine-is-female-sterilization/