>>241
I am over on QR jumping up and down and trying to take people up. It's like nobody gives a damn. Their natural curiosity is numbed. They are mezmerized and numbed by the constant flow of bullshit.
Just added thoughts on #3 and nobody bites. Practically handing it to them on a silver platter.
1.Why did the DoJ learn about the FBI's interest in Flynn's conversations with the Russian Amb. from a CONVERSATION WITH OBAMA in the Oval Office?
HOW did the illegal spying on Flynn originate? Strange that Obama knew of the FBI's interest in Flynn's talk w/ the Russian Amb. before the DoJ knew. DO WE UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS IMPLIES? That the spying was directed by Obama.
2. Why was Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn unmasked by Obama's chief of staff, Joe Biden, Susan Rice, and others?
Let's dig into this.
–Did they suspect Flynn of collaborating with an adversary?
–Was it a fishing expedition, hoping to find dirt on Trump so they could obstruct his presidency?
–Were they trying to create a cause of action for the eventual appointment of a special counsel to continually investigate a President (and his NSI, Flynn) who had done nothing wrong?
–What happened that caused 39 officials to request the unmasking of Flynn?
–How did they all learn (who told them?) that Flynn was a target?
To get to the bottom of "who told them", we need to understand exactly WHEN these unmasking requests occured (dates)? The answer is found here:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/flynn-unmaskers-what-happened-what-means-fred-fleitz
"…[The list was released on May 13th of] 39 top Obama officials who made 53 requests to unmask Lt. Gen. Flynn’s name from intelligence reports [dated] Nov. 8, 2016 [thru] Jan. 31, 2017. While many of the requesters were Obama political appointees who resigned by Jan. 20, 2017, some were career officers at CIA, the Pentagon and other agencies. The most stunning thing about this list is that the vast majority of these requests were dated between Dec. 14 and 16, which was before Flynn’s Dec. 29 phone call to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. [Recall the significance of that call:] An NSA intercept of this phone call was the basis of the Jan. 24, 2017, FBI interview with Flynn when two FBI agents used this intercept to entrap Flynn into lying about the call." …
So we are looking for some kind of meeting or document or testimony that these 39 officials have in common - the impetus behind their unmasking requests.
3. Why was Michael Flynn's identity leaked—a CRIMINAL ACT—to the press?
Let's dig into this one.
–Was it legally permissible - although highly unusual and improper - for 39 officials to request unmasking Flynn's identity in intel intercepts? OK we'll skip over that for a moment.
–Once they had Flynn's identity, weren't they required to treat that info as confidential?
The answer is found in a PDF document that Q dropped here on Wed, Jul 24 2019: "PROCEDURES FOR THE AVAILABILITY OR DISSEMINATION OF RAW SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION BY THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY UNDER SECTION 2.3 OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333 (RAW SIGINT AVAILABILITY PROCEDURES)". Table of Contents pics related. How unmasked identities must be treated will be found somewhere in here.
–How can we learn if leaking Flynn's identity to the press was indeed a criminal act?
–What statute or executive order or regulation governs?
–If guilty, what's the penalty?
–WHO might have leaked it? Any one of the 39 officials who requested unmasking of Flynn. Possibly anyone who worked for or with each of the 39 or had access to their confidential info.
–TO WHOM in the press was it leaked? We should be able to narrow that down by listing WHO published it first and WHEN and WHERE.
WHY was Flynn's ID leaked to the press?
(Considering that the leakage was a criminal act and the individual who leaked it likely knew they were breaking the law.)
–WHAT did that individual hope to accomplish?
–Did they leak to a known press ally, knowing that the leaked ID would be published?
–Was it to create a harsh public perception of the good General?
–Was it to "launder" the information so it would seem to come from a journalist instead of directly from an Obama WH insider?
–Was it to create a pretext for FBI interviewing Flynn?
We KNOW from other declassified docs that the FBI set up Flynn. They wanted to frame him. They wanted to get him to lie and get him fired.
–WHY did they want Flynn fired?
–HOW was Flynn a threat to their plans to usurp power and dump Donald Trump from the presidency by force? (I.e. a COUP)
Let's do REAL JOURNALISM.
The MSM is not going to answer these questions. They are too weak and stupid and corrupt. Their only motivation is to keep covering up the truth.
We need anons to step up and do REAL JOURNALISM and dig into this puzzle and keep pulling the yarn until the pieces all come together.
-
Why did James Clapper, John Brennan, Samantha Power, and Susan Rice privately ADMIT UNDER OATH that they had no evidence of collusion, WHILE SAYING THE OPPOSITE PUBLICLY?
#Obamagate
–Is it perjury to lie to a Congressional committee?
–Did these individuals give sworn testimony before Congress? When?
–Are the transcripts public? Where?
–Can we identify where in their sworn statements they denied any evidence of (Trump-Russia) collusion?
–Can we identify the public statements asserting that there WAS (Trump-Russia) collusion?
–If these statements differ as alleged, is that perjury?
–Is it a criminal offense?
–What statute?
–What's the penalty if found guilty?
This is how we do journalism, anons.
-
Why did the Obama administration use opposition research— funded by a political organization and filled with foreign
dirt—to spy on members of the Trump campaign?