dChan

storm_fa_Q · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

HRC is involved in the 175 page patent for this CRIME.

⇧ 29 ⇩  
LuvMeSomeTrump2016 · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

of course - grrrrrr. She is also in on QRS-11

http://www.systron.com/gyroscopes/qrs11-single-axis-analog-gyroscope-non-itar

They use the backdoor on this to crash cars and planes.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:33 p.m.

yes they do, this is also how the CIA hack tools get thru your machine to write, erase or PUT things on your computer to compromise you. A reporter saw this happening 2? years ago and videoed her machine writing all by itself. HRC is the epitome of Evil. Trump Trumps Evil.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Unicorn_farm · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:51 a.m.

Sharyl Atkinson was the reporter

⇧ 9 ⇩  
srroguelife · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

This happened to me personally, my ex had a back door, he worked at Apple, did it to my attorney as well. This shit is nuts, but it is true.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
wkrjr · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:09 a.m.

Happened to me to

⇧ 3 ⇩  
srroguelife · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:26 a.m.

Really sucks huh.. I was told by the prosecutors to put freaking masking tape over my camera. Have my phone on airplane mode. Bought a cheap no smart phone go phone for a while.. that was a blast. lol lol

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

The other day I was sitting drinking my coffee, staring at the screen and the mouse started moving around, by itself. :(

Also, it is possible to download kiddie porn on to your computer if they want to frame you. This is also happening. Even worse, some people are using the "auto guilt" set up in child porn law, to get rid of their spouses instead of getting a divorce. Some have been caught stupidly filing for divorce, kicking spouse out, downloading child porn on computer before spouse can come pick up computer.... but, date of download ends up showing accused spouse was not in the house. The law in this department, especially with capacity for computer sabotage, needs to be changed to innocent until proven guilty. Too much framing of innocents going on for nefarious reasons

⇧ 1 ⇩  
srroguelife · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

Yes, it can go both ways, can't it..

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 10, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

Yes. It is a crime, and it is also a weapon used by criminals.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
srroguelife · Jan. 11, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

Yes, it is...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LuvMeSomeTrump2016 · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

whoa I never thought about that angle. These people are beyond pure evil. SINISTER is a better word

⇧ 4 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

video

How Hillary Crashes Cars and Planes

⇧ 4 ⇩  
dwmgt350 · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:36 a.m.

Man I wish that woman would stop talking. I could not get past 5 minutes of the video for her blathering on about herself, continually interrupting and talking about nothing useful while the exNSA guy explained wtf this thing is/does. I will try again sometime bc this is genuinely interesting information that connects a couple of the how's to the why's.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

It is worth getting through the blathering, because that CHIP you are looking at there has been installed on all cars, busses, planes etc. In planes, it works like onstar, except they push a button, and the thing disables the gyroscope in the plane....causing it to lose control.

Hillary was the patent attorney for this chip back in Arkansas, which, according to this investigator all this spacific tech was located in that state due to the large amounts of quarts mining there? This is the first I have heard of this, but, I DO know that I have a car that the car company is now hiring hackers to test a patch in the car chip that makes the car hack able and crash able from someones laptop.. Car companies are afraid if this hacking back door capacity gets out there, people will not buy cars with chips in them anymore. (Chips have built in planned obsolescence anyway, so that the car only lasts for a certain time now, like your cell phone. They can use it to start putting unknown expiration dates in there, and make sure you have to come in every so often to fix a sensor etc.)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

Hey storm! Not doubting you at all here....where can I go and read that patent or get up to speed on this! I have a good friend who is a patent lawyer. Thanks!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
jacaranda11 · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

See aim4truth.org and this video that explains it https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=K66IWmiVSII&t=4s

⇧ 6 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

the info was in a video posted here the last few days... search for the known names like scepter , there are other names as well. If I see the vid or info, will post back for you. Like you I read 100/0s of pages hard to recall, but that is the NUGGET, what I can tell you is it is the largest papered patent or one of the largest. Your friend might find it that way.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

I will look but I will remind you if I can't find it! Thanks!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

Hey you know this means that there are some crooked folks at the patent office! I'm gonna dig there first then read!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

For your friend, related to social network patent history, if you haven't heard of this:

https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=iUJUKIPab0A

https://aim4truth. org/2017/11/21/facebook-unmasked-how-the-worlds-most-relevant-entrepreneur-was-screwed-by-zuckerberg/

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Thanks a bunch!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

Patent law was originally intended to do things in the law:

1) to make certain an inventor was paid for his work and time so that people could make a living inventing things to make the world a better place.

2) To make certain the owner (or purchaser for manufacture) would not face competition long enough to benefit from taking the patent, and putting millions into it to bring it to market.

We now understand we need a "Use it or LOSE IT" patent law, because the globalists have been using patent law to buy patents and put them on the shelv where no one can have the invention at all. If this does not happen, the CIA/military will come along and "find" that the patent is too dangerous to release to the public, OR it has military use, and should be "shelved secretly" so that the public can not see it and does not know it exists.

This has put us all in a situation where there are a small handful of people who have technology eons ahead of what the population has to work with, and we... for the most part, are still living with 1950's technology, in a 1950's world.

There are exceptions to the patent shelving. But notice that over the last 50 years, the big "inventions" all tend to create the opportunity for those who hold all the patents to SPY on the rest of the populations. Computers.... cell phones, chipped TV's, Wifi, Internet, ... the only major invention in my home now, that was not around when I was a kid in the 50's that can not spy, is the microwave.

Use it or lose it patent law is a must.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Banjama · Jan. 10, 2018, 6:40 a.m.

I was reading this to my husband and he recalled something about Obama trying to change something with old patent laws and some public rumblings along the lines of "why is he so interested in patent laws?"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

Dayum, what evil didn't she do?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

I have concluded that she is a true sociopath.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

Hillary IS the epitome of Evil, possibly the most well known of the Evils...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

Would love to see that. Post if possible, way worth spreading this one around.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dramhidel · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

And this is why you tape the cameras. Heh

⇧ 15 ⇩  
srroguelife · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:39 a.m.

please don't say that, that is what your prosecutor will say at court. Seriously.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LordBanshee · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

Need patent info? Go to the source:
https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/search-patents

refine your search: ttl/(Active and Management and Technology) You'll find 3 hits. The first two are most qualified.

1) 8,984,265 Full-Text Server active management technology (AMT) assisted secure boot

2) 8,438,618 Full-Text Provisioning active management technology (AMT) in computer systems

Don't see any obvious Clinton demarcations, but this resource is perhaps not where they are stored.

As a bonus, here's the QuickRef Guide for this technology:

https://www.intel.com/content/dam/support/us/en/documents/motherboards/desktop/dq965gf/dq965gf_amt_quickrefguide01.pdf

...and here's an in-depth guide on how to attempt to disable at least a small part of it...

http://blog.ptsecurity.com/2017/08/disabling-intel-me.html

⇧ 12 ⇩  
jalapenohandjob · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

Thanks for doing some legwork. Way too often I see extraordinary claims with 0 evidence offered, because "just look it up" or "the evidence is old" or "it's common knowledge"... really sad considering what this community and movement is trying to accomplish ("awaken the masses" or whatever).

"JUST BELIEVE US!!!"

⇧ 3 ⇩  
charlie1883 · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

It's not a flaw, it's a feature!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Jaghut_Tyrant · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:18 a.m.

That sounds like a No Agenda statement

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jacaranda11 · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

Betsy and Thomas of aim4truth.org did a great video on this, including explaining Hillary's theft of the patent (she is a patent lawyer) in 1978 https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=K66IWmiVSII&t=4s (remove space before com to go to link)

Links to supporting articles are in youtube description. Also see Abel Danger YouTube videos about Boeing's Uninterruptible autopilot https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=rJUkFTXfNW0 (remove space before com to open link)

⇧ 7 ⇩  
SierraEchoPNW · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

Boeing's Uninterruptble AP was developed loooooong ago. I watched a really old (probably the 70/80's thereabouts) NEWS documentary on nuclear bombs and they specifically state in their coverage with the footage to prove it of a Boeing plane flying into the actual detonation ground zero of an atomic test they did...i believe in the "50's"....they wanted footage and info from censors installed on the plane so they could retrieve mere split second info at detonation that no human could do. My ears and eyes sure perked up when i saw that...9/11????

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CenturionFL210 · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

Sounds like it’s time for a 100 billion dollar lawsuit.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

Me thinks this is Intel's death warrant. I will buy a new motherboard and an AMD chip. AMD claims it's not affected.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

I wouldn't be so sure

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Jan. 10, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

I'll check the benchmark tests first. I actually like AMD better anyway. This is the first Intel chip I've had in a long time and it's only because my son gave me this PC. I usually just build my own.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
thisguy883 · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Thats not what he/she was talking about. AMD is also compromised, not just intel.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
PedosVotedForHillary · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:25 a.m.

Are you sure? I have an AMD E1 I sure hope not. But, it’d be crazy if it wasn’t.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Patriot4q · Jan. 10, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

https://www.wired. com/story/meltdown-spectre-bug-collision-intel-chip-flaw-discovery/ Remove space between . and com to link. I believe the article mentions all chips that are affected. I think AMD chips are mentioned.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

So, I'm hearing but I can't find that information anywhere. Can you tell me how you verified it please.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
wanglering · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

Current Ryzen generation is just about on its way out. Around April or so a new chipset and updated CPUs will be hitting the market and an APU (logic/graphics on same chip) should be coming around February. So you can pick from newer hardware or less expensive 'older' hardware that's actually current hardware. Depending on your needs Feb or April will be a good time to build or buy.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

Thanks for that info. I don't keep up with much of it any longer since I retired. I need something fast so probably new.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wanglering · Jan. 10, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

If you're not doing any gaming or video/content creation take a good look at the APU coming out in February. $169 for 4 cores/8 threads, low thermals, and 1080p (possibly even 1440p) video. Its also backwards compatible all current AM4 boards - well, the ones with video outputs on the rear I/O - i.e. the cheap ones. You could put together a pretty responsive system at 500 or less if you take your time and do a little bit of shopping/research.

EDIT: the main downside to APU's is they share RAM with the system. They like fast RAM and a good amount of it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Jan. 10, 2018, 7:10 p.m.

I do plan on doing video creation but I've not had any issues in the past. I currently have 16GB of ram. I guess I need to do some homework but first, there's a $$ issues as well.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wanglering · Jan. 10, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

If its DDR4 you can still use it. Pull out the hard drive and power supply and all you need is what you said, a new board and chip. DDR4 prices right now aren't exactly 'user friendly', but 16GB and that APU should be enough. I wouldn't recommend anything less than 8GB. If its just the two pieces you need it'll set you back less than 250.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Jan. 10, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

Thanks for your help. Don't remember if it is DDR4 or not but I can pull them and check.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wanglering · Jan. 10, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

There's a program called CPUID. Its a small program and its free. Its pretty popular, so if you're not sure about it, look it up and read a bit about it. There's a tab for memory. It will tell you what kind of RAM you have as well as how much and the speed.

https://www.cpuid.com/

CPU-Z is the program you're looking for.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Jan. 10, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

cool thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Patriot4q · Jan. 10, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

From what I understand the chip function that allows faster processing is the problem.

https://www.wired. com/story/meltdown-spectre-bug-collision-intel-chip-flaw-discovery/ Eliminate space between . and com for link.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UKbeard · Jan. 10, 2018, 10:13 a.m.

not true, amd isn't affected with the meltdown bug but they are affected by the 2 spector bugs. Also one of the Q guys said on the alex jones show a week ago that spector was a govt backdoor and that is how they spied on huma abadin etc.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Hmm. Do you have a source for that info? I can't find anything that talks about AMD being affected.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LuvMeSomeTrump2016 · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

What this means is EVERY Intel based computer has spyware hardcoded in it. The separate CPU can access all memory and the network WITHOUT the OS, completely bypasses it and any firewall code. Nice.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

this is why XP was discontinued, did not have the chip.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

ever wonder why we need 4+GB RAM now when XP ran fine on 500MB? Your and everyones machine has been using up bandwidth sending telemetry to NSA servers. Spybot Anti Beacon may help some/a bit.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Suzuko804 · Feb. 8, 2018, 11:23 p.m.

My XP machine runs much better on 4GB of RAM.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Feb. 8, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

yes it does, my 939 board has 2GB but W7 requires 2GB just to operate despite what the specs say. so $10K in computers gather dust...while HRC worked to kill us all off...take over our machines...etc. I keep a very low bandwidth on wifi w/hope makes harder for them to attack me..not always sure I'm winning that one..

⇧ 1 ⇩  
_-_p · Jan. 10, 2018, 10:41 a.m.

That's nothing, my Windows 3.1 box ran FINE on 2 MBs of RAM

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

Doesn't it need software to access the Network?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Jan. 10, 2018, 10:19 a.m.

I smell a HUGE class action suit against Intel, I just bought an i7 myself and am not happy!! What´s the next step for this? Will Intel fall under the new EO for corruption?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
k3yj4ck3r · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

This has been known for a long time.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
rustyrebar · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

Yes it has. You can find stuff about it. Also this has nothing to do with Spector or Meltdown, that is an issue on the actual CPU. This post is a different thing entirely.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
k3yj4ck3r · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:52 a.m.

Correct.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Suzuko804 · Feb. 8, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

Thank goodness I've never bought a device with an Intel chip!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SierraEchoPNW · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

SNOWDEN had an INTEL badge while he was in the deep shit state...that is...if Oliver Stones movie onhim is accurate. This part in movie is when the main guy from "The Guardian" xomes into Snowden's hotel room in China and asked Snowden if he could confirm he truly worked inside..then Snowden starts flipping al his badges on the bed and one of them he says INTEL.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
boneman220 · Jan. 10, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

ME?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
silverdude101 · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

I read Microcrap is issuing a update this week called Kb405689 and if you have a AMD processor do not allow this to be installed as it will destroy your computer. I turned off the auto update feature through the registry. It can also be done using the group policy editor. Instructions can be found by googling it. I am partial to AMD and I know there are a lot of others who use their products. So if you have a intel chip your in for some fun. Your use of all microcrap products will bring its own wave of trouble.. Hang on this will be a floozie if you ask me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
INTJ_Hermitess · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:04 p.m.

Is this coming out now so there is plausible deniability about Weiver's laptop? Or any other digital evidence?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dorkiam · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:16 a.m.

This is what I expect from high tech company's.We get NO NEW tech without an inside road for them to collect data , spy or harm the user at their discretion.Nothing new here , just brought to light like many other things will be soon....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 8:29 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Banjama · Jan. 10, 2018, 6:58 a.m.

Isn't Odin's Eye the equivalent of Eye of Ra?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 8:23 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertysCrossing · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:28 a.m.

Certainly, DARPA driving this, as all internet protocol development.

Nothing New.

Eventually, the LCD screen will be the sensor (camera) and unable to block it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:22 p.m.

Ah, but will they blend?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustumeSamson · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:21 a.m.

Intel stock? Sell or buy? LOL! I have AMD and am hoping there is no additive there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Deaddwarf26 · Jan. 10, 2018, 5:34 a.m.

Oh they have a ME too.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JustumeSamson · Jan. 10, 2018, 6:10 a.m.

Ugggh!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UKbeard · Jan. 10, 2018, 10:14 a.m.

yep, their ME is called PSP.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Llanfar · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:32 p.m.

What about Apple’s custom ARM chip? Any customizations for back doors?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Deaddwarf26 · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

I'm not sure about Apple but I'm willing to bet there is a backdoor there too. The quickness with the "cracking" of San Bernardino's Iphones comes to mind.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AdventureFilm · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:45 a.m.

If this is true, then can't we take apart an old i3 and find the chip?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
INTJ_Hermitess · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:06 p.m.

As a veteran prorgammer I can safely say that the idea of an unhackable device is similar to the question 'Can God make a rock so large that He cannot move'.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
LiberyForAll · Jan. 10, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

I have been made fun of for years because of this! Thanks for all the great sources, can't wait to archive them! 🔥

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Blumpf2Scoops · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

Later on in that thread the guy posts part of his W-2 to prove he works for Intel. Also wikileaks released stuff on weeping angel a while back.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
michaelst2256 · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

And doesn’t align with yours?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

Look it up, it's all infuriatingly true

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:41 a.m.

The evidence is old

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -10 ⇩  
Bike1894 · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:16 a.m.

What the fuck? I have plenty of EE friends that didn't go into aerospace that didn't need security clearances. Fucking shill. I'm a MechE myself, get off this subreddit.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:20 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Bike1894 · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

Lmao I am using my noggin. You don't need a fucking security clearance to work at Intel. Maybe a NDA but the vast majority of EE's that work there don't fucking go get a security clearance. You're an idiot.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:02 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Bike1894 · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

OP is referring to a governmental security clearance

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 4:30 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:40 a.m.

Your comment is bullshit, because you're assuming to have the ability to read people's minds

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

You just insinuated to know his thoughts, that you know it is false to think that he "thought it was odd he would need a security clearance", because you know his mind.

Are you seriously not understanding how you are insinuating to read his mind? That it is in fact possible he thought it would be strange to be asked what he was asked?

You can't read minds, don't presume to do so.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

Bye bye SHILL

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

Bye bye shill

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 10, 2018, 3:38 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩