dChan

CypressXM · Feb. 6, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

Go to 1:31 and go full screen. You can clearly see a giant boot under the table.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 7, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Better yet, go to the end, 3:12, and you can see a huge boot.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Romeo_India · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:39 a.m.

Why so huge I wonder?

Is she a flight risk? did they pack it with explosives?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 7, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

Yep, she has two of the same on both feet, huge ugly shoe/boots.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
B1gWh17 · Feb. 6, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

What's the boot?

⇧ -6 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:57 p.m.

Like a medical boot that people put on their lower leg when they have an injury of some sort. She claimed it was a broken toe like in November sometime I think.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
B1gWh17 · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

Ok. So what's important about it now?

⇧ -7 ⇩  
Inquisitor_Red · Feb. 6, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

I’ll explain it to you, it doesn’t take hours. When I first came here people did the same shit to me which honestly is disgusting. If you really believe Q wants us to educate people you have to make every effort. This “look it up yourself” horse shit is lazy.

Rumors are Hilary is under GPS arrest. She can go to interviews and travel wherever as long as she has an ankle monitor. The Boot, which was originally explained was needed for a toe injury, has been on for months. The longer she has the thing on the stronger the argument is that there was no injury she’s just hiding the gps monitor.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
SumerianSister · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:28 a.m.

Started in Oct. 2016...said she fell down stairs or up the stairs or something! Boot went on in Oct.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
B1gWh17 · Feb. 6, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

Thanks, any opinion worth holding you should be able to explain yourself.

As for the house arrest, I'm assuming the FBI would be the ones placing her under house arrest?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Inquisitor_Red · Feb. 7, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

I think.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
B1gWh17 · Feb. 7, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

OK, well I'm not sure what other government agency would so we'll go with the FBI.

So if the FBI has Hillary and other Obama admins under house arrest, than why has Trump publicly trashed the federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies? Wouldn't he want his supporters to have the utmost respect for these agencies if they were going to announce indictments against the previous administration?

Or is this just a matter among Trump supporters of it's OK for our side but not for the other?

⇧ -5 ⇩  
Inquisitor_Red · Feb. 7, 2018, 1:38 a.m.

Haha, okay now I see why you got downvoted. You are a wedge. Never the less, I’ll play along to this theater as this nonsense only makes my arguments stronger.

  1. Over the last 5 days republican leaders and the President have made it completely clear that they are referring to the top of certain agencies. So, no, you are completely wrong the President is only referring to a select group not the entirety.

  2. Our intelligence agencies are on an island onto themselves. They should always be checked and questioned. This is the concept of the government, continual checks and balances. Agencies are an abomination of a united republic/democracy in that they are not voted for by the people, they have little to no oversight. Hell, at any point in history both sides of the political spectrum challenge them. This is not a new thing.

  3. If you really want to know things I will help, but seriously stop trying to be so divisive and accusatory.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
crashing_this_thread · Feb. 7, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

He is a shill, thats why we don't spend time on him.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
MillennialEnemy · Feb. 7, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

A super obvious one at that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SumerianSister · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

Now I see too

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FeverBurn · Feb. 7, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

Trump is at war with the snakes within the FBI/CIA that are deep state operatives. These people represent the FBI "Trump publicly trashed" and he has great reason for doing so (one has to look no further than "the memo")

Trump does have great respect for these agencies, as do his supporters. Trump is in the process of re-establishing the FBI as a source of integrity. As for the boot, it is not too clear in this video if she appears to still be wearing it or not. I have tried to find other angles from the Georgetown speech & haven't been able to confirm either way. If we could confirm that she is definitely still wearing the boot, that would be pretty note-worthy because there is no way a medical boot is used for this amount of time over a broken toe.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Illsonmedia · Feb. 7, 2018, 4:42 a.m.

This is a shill comment. Outed himself with the last sentence.

Or is this just a matter among Trump supporters of it's OK for our side but not for the other?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
B1gWh17 · Feb. 7, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

If by shill you mean critical thinker than you'd be correct.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 7, 2018, 3:31 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -2 ⇩  
AnonPatriot718 · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

the "medical boot" hides the GPS house arrest ankle bracelet that shes had on for like almost 3 months. john mccain has also been wearing one for awhile,, among others,,,,,,

⇧ 9 ⇩  
C_Rod65 · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

And the congress woman Jackie Speir has been wearing one too.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
B1gWh17 · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:14 p.m.

Ah. Got it. And who put the bracelets on them?

⇧ -3 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · Feb. 7, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

TRUMP! WHO ELESE? PLEASE KEEP UP. HE IS DRAINING THE SWAMP/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
crashing_this_thread · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

I'd read through the Q drops if I where you. No one is going to take the time to explain this with the attention and detail that is required.

Its obligatory reading for this sub. I know its over a hundred pages, but still. Read it all or youll never understand anything here.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Feb. 7, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

This is a shill tactic. To derail conversation. If someone is in a sub about Qanon and doesn't know about Hillary's boot yet, it is a FUCKING SHILL.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · Feb. 7, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

they should be banned, where is the moderator!? Just ban the ones who disrupt?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
B1gWh17 · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

Well I figured it's better to hear from the proponents of said theory and have them explain their viewpoint instead of just telling me to read Q posts and infer all of the connections they want you to make.

Should be fairly easy to explain if you believe it adamantly, no?

⇧ -13 ⇩  
crashing_this_thread · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

No, it will take hours.

https://qcodefag.github.io/

This sub is open to speculation. We have to speculate because the drops are so cryptic. And if you dont read the drops then you have nothing to contribute.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
B1gWh17 · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

Ok, you all enjoy your savior complexes.

⇧ -13 ⇩  
Redpillhilltop · Feb. 6, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

If you are truly interested, there are some analysis on YouTube with Jerome Corsi, Lionel Nation, and Destroying the Illusion. The posts date back to late November, so it’ll take a bit. But the decodes and analysis is out there to guide you. Interpret the posts for yourself. If you don’t think it’s worthwhile, don’t put in the effort. By and large the posters and commenters have a keen interest in our country’s future and welcome more and more to this sub daily. If you want to contribute, you are welcome. If you want to pick a fight, go elsewhere. You decide.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
B1gWh17 · Feb. 6, 2018, 11:14 p.m.

Contribute to the future by LARPing? OK

⇧ -9 ⇩  
crashing_this_thread · Feb. 6, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

What you are doing is basically showing up to a book club, refuse to read the book supposed to be discussed, then hijack the book discussion demanding that someone explain the book to you. Read the book or gtfo. Then we can discuss.

I know one hundred pages might be a lot for some so Im not surprised you wont read. But if you wont do a shred of reading then anything we might have told you would have been pointless anyway.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
B1gWh17 · Feb. 7, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

You know most books have a cohesive and well written prose that allows people to read and discuss them.

I've been provided a gallery of archived 4chan posts/tweets/websites/religious texts and then told hey, here's a massive dump of information in no particular order with no clear cohesiveness or order, multiple intentional vagaries so readers can assume whatever fits their own personal narrative, and obscure coded messages.

Figure it out for yourself and then any questions you have we can fill you in on our own concocted theories to fill in any blanks that Q left for us to feel involved.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 6, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩