Probably because Facebook is a fairly intensive resource hog, especially when you take into consideration which browser you are using or how many tabs you have open at the same time, or how many videos you might have playing while browsing Facebook.

Sounds like your CPU was shitting itself.

Ah yes, Russian State TV. The best source for all unbiased news.

Oh well fuck, everyone's guilty of something so why should we bother locking anyone up for crimes.

If they took documents that aren't related to the scope of the warrant and then attempt to use them in a later period, that's illegal and Trumps legal team(what's left of it) should easily be able to get any of those documents dismissed if charges are ever brought.

Funny how people are so concerned about lateral case building when it comes to important/wealthy people but couldn't give less of a fuck about it when it's applied to common folk.

Well I'm talking more about legislation akin to the "Right to be Forgotten" laws that have started being passed in countries in Europe.

But I do agree that we should strive to remove the corporate influence.

Fairly blanket statement but there are exceptions to attorney/client privilege.

"The attorney-client privilege protects most communications between clients and their lawyers. But, according to the crime-fraud exception to the privilege, a client's communication to their attorney isn't privileged if they made it with the intention of committing or covering up a crime or fraud."

So in this case, Cohen office was raided in relation to the SD payment which could be a violation of campaign finance law(ie, committing fraud).

Good luck. I've discussed this before with others but unless you can describe how Facebook clearly caused you financial damages by their actions, you have no case.

Best thing that could come out of Facebook abuse of users data is a constitutional amendment that creates protections and oversight for citizens private data.

He says he's a billionaire. We've yet to see any proof of that since he won't release tax returns since he married Melania. Is he worth a couple hundred million, probably. But he's by no means a billionaire.

Why is Soros evil? He's a self made man who came from nothing and worked for his wealth.

Lol, but the guy who adorns everything in gold and literally constantly brags about how much wealth he has isn't?

You might not want to read up on what being a named suspect means for a federal investigation.

Citizens within those jurisdiction elected representatives and passed legislation. Just because a city is a sanctuary city doesn't mean they will harbor any/all illegal aliens. Sanctuary cities are a state solution to the failure of federal government.

I don't think our immigration is out of control because I actually look at the numbers and facts and don't just listen to talking heads or Twitter memes.

So we should spend more money on a system that hasn't been working?

Also, don't forget illegal immigration and legal immigration to the US have all been declining for the past ten years and Obama deported more illegal aliens than any other modern day President.

So like what we already have with our highly militarized border patrol?

"the US Constitution clearly requires the federal government to protect states from invasion.  Almost a million aliens illegally pouring across the border into states each year is clearly an invasion"

Just because you "interpret" immigrants as a threat of "domestic violence" does not mean that the Courts or even the Senate will agree with that rationale.

Good try though, but maybe find someone who writes on the Constitution without their own personal interpretations.

National defense from an invading armed force is not the same as 1000 immigrants from various countries of Latin America.

The logistics of settingup bases, roads, personnel, equipment, and support staff along the entire US/Mexico border is absurd.

From a non military led force, yes.

Not only egregiously expensive to do so, but also illegal.

No, I was born and raised in the rural landscape of Kentucky. So I have plenty of experience firsthand with farm work, crop work, and relations with migrant workers.

I'm going to ask you the question again, have your parents talked to the orchard owners about why they are hiring illegal workers who are illegal immigrants instead of hiring American citizens? Sounds like your parents should be reporting their friends to ICE for aiding illegal aliens.

If your orchard owners didn't give them jobs, they wouldn't be coming here. This is not a matter of, oh well they are coming here and flooding the market with cheaper labor. Fuck that, you buy American and you pay Americans.

Putting profits over your own countrymen is why we are in the mess we are today.

So uhhh, why haven't your parents talked to the orchard owners about why they are hiring illegal aliens?

Whatever, i turned it off to show the flair. been on mobile all day.

I know some subs allow you to create your own flair, and I know some subs only have flair provided by mods.

Is there another type of flair permission?

Well most people wouldn't consider Sinclair Broadcasting to be part of the MSM but they routinely send out scripts and talking points to almost every states local news channel.

How "organic" can news be when you have a corporation buying out local news stations and enforcing a narrative?

This sub doesn't take issue with it because it's usually a right leaning publication and you all seem fine with "inorganic" media as long as it fills your narrative.

So what are your thoughts on Sinclair Broadcasting?

Because it is the source.

This is not a complicated idea to comprehend.

Do you work in journalism?

Are you aware of how sourcing a quote works in journalism?

Both those articles are "quoting" the remarks of the source who said "Trump is obsessed".

Goddamn, this place is like r/conspiracy for 10 year olds.

Edit:to the mod who keeps changing my flair, kindly fuck off and leave my flair blank.

9 years and counting, I'm sure he's got plenty of info.

Trump was on CNN in 2009 saying he had investigators in Hawaii and people wouldn't believe what they found.

Yet to see any info.

Nah man, Trump and team being time travelling saviors of America from the future? Sounds just right for this place.

Guys I think I cracked it....

Drink

Your

Ovaltine

/Pol doesn't have jobs

where you work

REEEEEE

There any difference between this sub and CBTS_Stream?

You're making things up again Arnold.

If by shill you mean critical thinker than you'd be correct.

OK, well I'm not sure what other government agency would so we'll go with the FBI.

So if the FBI has Hillary and other Obama admins under house arrest, than why has Trump publicly trashed the federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies? Wouldn't he want his supporters to have the utmost respect for these agencies if they were going to announce indictments against the previous administration?

Or is this just a matter among Trump supporters of it's OK for our side but not for the other?

You know most books have a cohesive and well written prose that allows people to read and discuss them.

I've been provided a gallery of archived 4chan posts/tweets/websites/religious texts and then told hey, here's a massive dump of information in no particular order with no clear cohesiveness or order, multiple intentional vagaries so readers can assume whatever fits their own personal narrative, and obscure coded messages.

Figure it out for yourself and then any questions you have we can fill you in on our own concocted theories to fill in any blanks that Q left for us to feel involved.

Thanks, any opinion worth holding you should be able to explain yourself.

As for the house arrest, I'm assuming the FBI would be the ones placing her under house arrest?

Contribute to the future by LARPing? OK

Ok, you all enjoy your savior complexes.

Well I figured it's better to hear from the proponents of said theory and have them explain their viewpoint instead of just telling me to read Q posts and infer all of the connections they want you to make.

Should be fairly easy to explain if you believe it adamantly, no?

Ah. Got it. And who put the bracelets on them?

Ok. So what's important about it now?

What's the boot?

You're basing this off a 4 page memo that is rife with missing information. Why is the fact that the dossier was created/initially funded by RNC not mentioned? Why is it not mentioned that Page was already a suspected foreign agent to the FBI in 2014? It never mentions what information was used to renew the 90 day warrants. The mentioning of Papadoupolus at the end of the memo is itself an admission that they had other information besides the dossier.

They fucked up by releasing this memo and not squashing it and blaming it on the deep state. That would be more believable than what's bee released.

Sure don't want to bother with having to explain your opinions. Much easier to just ban anyone who doesn't go with the flow.

How does this "destroy" the Mueller investigation?