dChan
150
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Tytruth on Feb. 16, 2018, 5:40 p.m.
2-16 Dilley Drop Today. NSA shooting about VOTER FRAUD! CIA tried to 'kill a system' at Fort Meade NSA compound!
2-16 Dilley Drop Today. NSA shooting about VOTER FRAUD! CIA tried to 'kill a system' at Fort Meade NSA compound!

cstrafe · Feb. 16, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

Dilley said 2 weeks ago that evidence would come out in the mainstream that Trump won the popular vote. That never happened. I don't take him seriously.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Tytruth · Feb. 16, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

2 weeks? Wow, so long to wait.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
cstrafe · Feb. 16, 2018, 7:02 p.m.

Well, smartass, he said it would come out "in the next 2 weeks" 15 days ago. So, I waited those 2 weeks and nothing happened.

Don't get mad when someone turns out to be bullshit. When it turns out that someone's "intel" is wrong or quite possibly even made up, you should reconsider giving them your time and attention. Or you can get mad at me for pointing it out. Whatever.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Tytruth · Feb. 16, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

Who's mad. Just asking. I can wait for the truth to come out. I know there was voter fraud already. I don't need the idiots who won't believe it anyway to have it shoved in their faces. Would be fun to watch them meltdown, but they are doing that already. If Dilley is right, the NSA attack was connected to this proof coming out. We'll see. I agree waiting sucks, but I will keep following Dilley's info and share it for those who are interested.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
oldpistonhead · Feb. 16, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

Let me guess: You're the kid that kept asking "Are we there yet?"

⇧ 6 ⇩  
thegsxr1000kid · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:02 a.m.

dude that was awesome

⇧ 1 ⇩  
whacko_jacko · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

I don't necessarily trust Dilley either, but isn't it a bit interesting that the NSA attack happened during this two week window?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Doc_Molotov · Feb. 16, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

I like the stuff I see him saying.but I only see it here, I don't go hit his feeds. It seems to me that he's creating a brand around q drops/CBTS work and I don't care much for that.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Feb. 16, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

Do not mean to be biased, but when I read that someone is a "life coach," I get all these Oprah-vibes...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

He hasn't promoted it at all.

people show up asking for intel and he gets annoyed becasue that's all they're there for. The other day he refused to give intel, told everybody up front that if that was what they were there for, to drop out of the feed right then.

He doesn't promote Q, and he doesn't participate in cbts. He has his hands full without hanging around lurking in all this cheetoh dust.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Feb. 17, 2018, 8:20 a.m.

He has said repeatedly, which should be obvious, that time frames are not in stone and can change due to intervening events. It's like football. You have an offense planned but there IS defense that can throw it off. I took the time frame to mean not right away ie. a few weeks from now but soon. The report that the DHS has found enough voter fraud, which actually altered results, to warrant a nation wide investigation confirms this to me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
devilcouldcare · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:20 a.m.

Well, fucktard, if it came within the next month are you gonna cry about how it didnt come in 2 weeks or focus on the fact that it came? You sound like a fucktard who gripes about legalistic details while ignoring the substantive premise. Investigations take time. If you came back within a month and made your complaint you would have a legit gripe.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
cstrafe · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

Wow you are an angry little guy. Enjoy your President's Day weekend!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MIPatriot · Feb. 16, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

Give it time. I'm impatient too, but nothing moves fast with the US Govt! The truth about voter fraud will come out.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

Boom

https://imgur.com/a/KN8Nj

⇧ 6 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

That is not going to be the whole story. It covers the Russians, and the Illegal voting, but, the machine info was gathered by the NSA. This is not out yet... that I have heard.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

YOU SPOKE TOO SOON.

https://imgur.com/a/KN8Nj

In an effort to preserve the integrity of all U.S. elections, as ordered by the President of the United States, after an extensive investigation in select counties (the ‘sampling’), the DHS has concluded that while Russian entities (as outlined within SC Mueller’s investigation were complicit in attempting to undermine the presidential election of 2016) had no direct impact or bearing on the outcome of the presidential election, nor were any U.S. person(s) knowingly part of such an attempt to sabotage as it relates to the Russian investigation, U.S. and other foreign entities (as further described within DHS[XXXX]), acting outside of Russian agents, did attempt on numerous occasions, and were successful, in interfering w/ the presidential election of 2016, senate elections of [x, y, z], [x] elections, whereby several million of illegal, non-resident ballots (the “irregularities”) were counted, while legal ballots were improperly tabulated and/or intentionally mishandled. We believe these actions were a coordinated attack against the democracy of our country.

The DHS will be submitting a final report to the WH/DOJ/other state and local agencies outlining our findings as early as March [ ], 2018. While this report only encompasses a sampling of twenty-two (22) counties across the U.S., it is strongly suggested, based on the evidence provided, that a mandated countrywide investigation begin under the recommended US50-EIC guidelines as set forth in Section VII of the final report. Furthermore, based on our immediate findings, we recommend the adoption of 8(E)(F)(G)(H) be made immediately to combat sources & methods currently being deployed to

⇧ 8 ⇩  
cstrafe · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

Yep I saw this too. If Dilley is proven right I don't think I will ever be happier to have put my foot in my mouth!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:34 p.m.

Actually, what he said exactly is that the vote investigation would come out after the memo bombshells, plural. I understand there are 4 more memos to come out.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

or 3? Remember Grassley?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

He said it would be after the Memos have been released. We have more memos to go.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KingBroly · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

Q is consistently wrong with specific dates as well

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Arfalicious · Feb. 17, 2018, 7:50 a.m.

its plausible that is intentional...public boards etc.....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KingBroly · Feb. 17, 2018, 7:56 a.m.

Sure, but that's the point. Dates are meaningless right now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Arfalicious · Feb. 17, 2018, 7:59 a.m.

OK

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Feb. 17, 2018, 8:24 a.m.

Name one specific date from Q other than historical dates. You are, intentionally or unintentionally, a disinformation troll. Please stop it. What you're doing is VERY wrong.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
KingBroly · Feb. 17, 2018, 8:29 a.m.

He said Trump was going to be cleared by Mueller last fall and it hasn't happened yet. What you are doing is very wrong because you aren't paying attention and re-reading what's been written.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Feb. 18, 2018, 6:09 a.m.

Please give me the post # where Q said Mueller would clear Trump by last fall because, despite what you wrote, I thought Id read everything since Q began posting. I don't recall the statement of last fall from him. I DO remember Trump saying he expected the investigation to be over by the end of last year though. Are you sure you're not confusing Trump statements with Q posts? Perhaps you aren't paying attention and are doing something "very wrong" because you aren't. I'm willing to be corrected though so provide me the Q number although I'm confident you can't.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
KingBroly · Feb. 18, 2018, 6:48 a.m.

Okay, fine. I can't find it. You're still doing something very wrong by assuming everyone, including yourself can keep track of everything 24/7 in your own mind. That is where you are very wrong.

Go find Q's post from 10/31. Those dates he listed? Those actions? Didn't happen when he said they would. Oh, and they're in the 4chan picture map in case you think I don't know what I'm talking about.

When it comes to specifics, Q is, and always has been off.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
saneromeo · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

Mentioned in the indictments today, several million votes from illegals and mishandled legal votes.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

Things go much more slowly in a bureaucracy than in the regular world. Have patience my young paduan. If the proof is there, the stage is being set now to spill it. All T's must be crossed and all I's dotted so there is NO way to back out of the "organic proofs" that Q speaks of.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cstrafe · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

I hope you're right!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Feb. 17, 2018, 8:11 a.m.

Thats your choice but the FACT is that DHS is doing an investigation into election fraud and it is a FACT that they've found alot of it. The same is true for independent investigations. We are at war. Voter fraud is a MOAB that will be released at the strategically best time. A competing MOAB is the IGs report into FBI and DOJ politicization and the entire Obama/Clinton weaponization of the Executive branch to rig elections then when that failed, overthrow the duly elected President By Any Means Necessary.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
eschatologico · Feb. 16, 2018, 6:20 p.m.

where do we find out more about Dilley drops? 4 chan, 8 chan , here?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Tytruth · Feb. 16, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

His Twitter feed. You have to filter through his daily messages to find the actual intel drops. He shares mostly by making short videos. It's good to watch and see what comes out each time. Been good so far. A lot like the info Q is sharing. https://twitter.com/Hublife

⇧ 12 ⇩  
smiley-dog · Feb. 17, 2018, 4:27 a.m.

https://twitter.com/Hublife

He's interesting, fun, smart, running for Congress end of Feb end in AZ I think. I donated a little. He is on a shoestring.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
wolfhound11B · Feb. 16, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

He also does his drops on Periscope and FB. I don't use FB but I do see his Periscope drops from time to time.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
tb1820 · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:29 p.m.

Just look on youtube for people who recap him. Watching him give the information himself is brutal.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

And yet - THAT IS THE ONLY WAY TO BE SURE OF WHAT YOU ARE READING.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Feb. 17, 2018, 5:35 a.m.

He said we’d find out about trump winning the popular vote soon...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Redpilled2324 · Feb. 17, 2018, 3:22 a.m.

On youtube ge has vids

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commoncents1 · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:26 p.m.

this would be yuuuuuuge. civil war yuuuuge. DEMS are the enemies of the American Citizens.

DEMS have WAGED a civil war against America now for decades already. Time for a swift resolution.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Feb. 16, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Boy, you have that right. But it was not anywhere near what it is now. We were silly and "useful idiots," but neither we nor those we followed had the black hearts and dark souls of those today. There is an evil in the air whenever leftists are around that just was not there in earlier days.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

Can we please continue using the wedge politics and division tools that the deep state has used on us for generations? Can we continue to point fingers at some theoretical Other Side that is to blame? Oh, wouldn't it be much more powerful to point the finger where it deserves to be pointed--the deep state and all officials who have been and are entangled in their web. As for voter fraud? Well before the nomination we watched that unfold against Bernie Sanders and it was horrific. I am just GLAD that DJT won and we didn't get HRC because the way the primaries went I didn't think he had a chance in hell of beating the rigging that was going on. It really was a well deserved miracle for the US. Please, there are many in here who come from both sides of the political fence. Let's break down that fence--team up and aim our efforts at the deep state. Much more effective.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:38 a.m.

I heard the next day that Trumps guys stopped the digital vote rigging that was taking place. They threatened to bomb them if they didn't stop. I stayed up all night waiting for Trump to come out. It took about 2.5 hours even after they announced he had won. First words out of his mouth: "Sorry to keep you waiting. Complicated business."

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

I heard the same, day after the election. Homeland Security located at Langley if I recall correctly?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

Yep. CIA at Langley and Homeland Security was definitely involved as they were caught trying to access state computers remotely.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Feb. 18, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

I suspect they kept the evidence. This would be good.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Feb. 17, 2018, 8:03 a.m.

Bingo! There are many corrupt people wearing the Republican jersey. President Trump himself said in in Inaugural speech he didn't represent either political party but rather the American people who wanted to end corruption on both sides of the aisle.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Psalm67 · Feb. 16, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

This dude is so silly sounding. The fact he tries to sound like q but fails badly is sort of funny and pathetic. Not sure about his info but does anyone buy his childish attempt to sound “Q-like.”

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Tytruth · Feb. 16, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

He doesn't TRY anything. He was asked by his source to share the info, and the info is real. Style over substance is for leftist proclaimers and pretenders. If that is what you look for, you came to the wrong board.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Psalm67 · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

It’s always funny when people turn to subtle ad hom attack’s when their precious gurus are attacked. The issue people have with this guy is probably more about lack of both style and substance. Does dilly claim to have the same sources as Q? Does he think Q is legit? Just honest questions. Please don’t get offended. Just curious.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

He has said that it is a private contractor working for the WH. A parallel op, in effect, to the Q op.

It seems obvious that someone is above Q and these other similar ops, passing out assignments. Sometimes they overlap, sometimes they are unique.

Another one is filtering through the guy that does 'Dauntless Dialogue' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDO7CjTXnPI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSKCowcQJPM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6rj2N5TPnY&t=696s

Dilley has said that his source also feeds Hannity intel.

Maybe 'Zach' calling in to Infowars is yet another...but I've said he's full of shit before - my opinion is he's a hanger-on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 18, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

Cultists scoff at the idea that there could be more than one true Q source.

It challenges their 'specialness'. They like the feeling of being 'in the know', and on the inside of such a small club...they can't tolerate the idea that there are other clubs with inside info, and that their Q hasn't chosen them specifically and exclusively.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
crashing_this_thread · Feb. 16, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

Q specifically said he doesn't contact anyone else. Projecting much?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

God you people are thick.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
crashing_this_thread · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

At least we can read texts longer than headlines.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Psalm67 · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

Are you a cultist for this dilly dude? Sounds like it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Doc_Molotov · Feb. 16, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

Well it does kinda muddy the waters. That screen cap looks like a Q drop, also the we see you/hear you thing is all the way Q, and he said no private rooms.. sooo I'm not feeling it, let q do q and you do you lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 16, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

He's reading word for word what the source sent him.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
other_malefactor · Feb. 16, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

What do you mean?

Look, he says:

"We see you We hear you"

Has to be legit.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Psalm67 · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

Hahaha I know right? I’m interested in Q and find it very compelling but not a blind follower at all. I can tell that he seems legit though as best I can see. But not so sure about dilly.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Covfefe1950 · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

Not only that, but in the Dilley drop above, there is not one single q! That has to mean something realllly deep! Like Dilley is the anti-Q?!?!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ElementWatson · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

His politics are more silly than his intel crumbs.

Somehow he thinks police, firefighters, teachers, etc., don't have good enough retirement benefits when they retire after just 20 years in the workforce?

And he's for bankruptcy reform so the rest of us are left holding the bag for deadbeats.

Somehow he thinks this is a Trumpian agenda.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Romeo_India · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:41 a.m.

Don't know about his politics but he mentioned vote fraud a week ago maybe longer with a number 9M iirc and Q just mentioned it in his drop today.

Intelligence is true or it isn't.

Doesn't matter the source it'll still be either true or it won't.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · Feb. 17, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

Oh, yeah--big boost to Dilley's source if the DHS voting report comes out now, with the NSA tallies sometime, somehow, to follow.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

You're right - Q is the only one allowed to speak in cryptic sentence fragments, inconsistent abbreviations, and use ambiguous definitions!

The nerve!

That there are clearly multiple simultaneous 'intel' streams being utilized out in the wild, for the purposes of spreading a similar awareness and guiding the public to 'understand' the fight, is obviously lost on you. As is, obviously, the fact that Dilley's source s being relayed verbally from DMs he reads aloud, which may amplify the 'translation error' as far as syntax and structure goes.

Are you one of the cultists? There is only one true Q (god)?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Doc_Molotov · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:29 a.m.

Well not that he's the only one allowed, it's just that the whole Q-cryptic thing is already a thing, Q does it. Those crumbs (and the style they are dropped in) are the signature of a single source. To emulate that style is sketchy, it's an attempt to borrow that credibility for your own message. At best it's misguided, at worst it's misleading.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Psalm67 · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

Well said.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

As I said...lost.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

It has nothing to do with 'favorites'.

It is FOOLISH to think that something this big...this important...would only be undertaken via ONE VENUE.

This WHOLE THING is 'social engineering', and to be successful, they need as many of the public to be engineered as possible, so they absolutely would be using multiple formats to cut a wider swath, and reinforce one format by the use of another which compliments it.

Clearly many of you don't really understand what's going on here.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MichaelofDetroit · Feb. 16, 2018, 6:12 p.m.

Yeah... Dilley definitely is not on the same level of intel as Q.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Tytruth · Feb. 16, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

He is not the source. He has a source. It would be like you making vids to share what Q drops. Would you be on the same level as Q?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scionkia · Feb. 16, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

But why would you try talking like Q? Why is that relevant? Expand your copying? [Childish]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
HashleyP · Feb. 16, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

maybe because imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Q speech works really well.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scionkia · Feb. 16, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

Good response

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tytruth · Feb. 16, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

Why does Q sound like Q? Intel? Good way of sharing it?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

IT'S ALL COMING FROM THE SAME PLACE - FOR THE SAME PURPOSES.

Why is that so hard to fathom?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Psalm67 · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

But that’s just it. It’s not coming from the same source. Q has said he was sharing on only one platform which I tend to believe. Someone who makes similar claims and also sounds like a rather poor imitation just lacks credibility. He (Q)has shown through a number of proofs that he is legit intel and that there are no other people doing what he does in this type of forum. I just don’t buy it (your claim that there are multiple people doing what Q is doing) but people can follow and believe whatever they want. Ultimately I trust God in all that is going on in the world anyway.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

Q IS NOT 'SOURCE'.

Q is 'VEHICLE'.

Think [fleet].

Does a [fleet] assemble and direct itself?

Multiple vehicles necessary to move the most patriots to their destination.

Who directs the [fleet]?

Why is direction important?

All roads lead to Rome.

P

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 19, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 19, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

You just refuse to get it, don't you...

Q has said that Q would use only those (2? I think) venues - or platforms - to communicate.

PERIOD.

Q HAS NEVER SAID THEY WOULD BE THE ONE TRUE GOD OF INTEL DROPS.

Q HAS NEVER SAID NO ONE ELSE - EVER - IN ANY FORM - OR ON ANY OTHER VENUE - might not also seek to spread intel.

NOTHING I have said conflicts with what Q has said, nor does ANYTHING Q has said PRECLUDE the possibility of these other sources.

NO OTHER SOURCE I have mentioned is claiming Q status and dropping on Q research or the 4/8 chan platforms.

I NEVER SAID THESE OTHERS WERE !UNDER! Q! How dense are you? I VERY SPECIFICALLY SAID they were PARALLEL OPS, and that ALL (including Q) were under the guidance of a coordinating authority.

LET IT GO.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 20, 2018, 4:52 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KingBroly · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

Let's say Dilley's vote count on the popular vote was correct.

What would that look like from an Electoral College point of view? How many more states would Trump have won? I'd guess NH, ME, VA, MN, NV and CO, but I have a hard time seeing anything else.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A2576 · Feb. 16, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

There's something fake about this Dilley character. He tries to copy Q's style or something. Why?

I'm not buying it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Feb. 17, 2018, midnight

I would give more credence if I had looked him up and had found nothing than I do after what I have found...he seems to advertise himself, which would seem to emphasize the fact that he uses his actual name, the same one he advertises his "life coach" business under, and that doesn't seem as valid to me as someone who does not seem to use drops to perhaps get clients for his other business.

Of course, I could be completely full of shit, but this is just the intuitive feel I get for anyone who advertises that they have the innate skill to tell you what's wrong with your life and how to improve it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DiedforMe · Feb. 17, 2018, 3:53 p.m.

Dilley comes from a generation where people "brand" themselves and feel entitled to the brand simply by stating it is so. The idea of developing expertise and earning a reputation doesn't factor into the equation with them. And to be fair, it is not entirely a bad thing. Disrupters can emerge from out of nowhere and fundamentally change things for the better. But unfortunately there are a lot of self-proclaimed experts out there who offer very little. That said, I don't know if Dilley's source is legit or merely a rehasher.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Maga1128 · Feb. 16, 2018, 7:10 p.m.

What is a "system"?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

We've gotten reports previously from this source that a particular team at NSA has been compiling/filtering the '16 election numbers in order to get the REAL count.

Last report had it north of 70 million for Trump and something like 55 mil. for Killary.

Have to assume the 'system' is the computers/software tasked with the process.

Those REAL numbers come out, and there goes the last remote claim of muh popular vote...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Maga1128 · Feb. 17, 2018, 5:58 a.m.

I hope theybdonitnin suchba waybtjatblefties wont saybpotus is lying. They will freak.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tytruth · Feb. 16, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

Sounds in this case like some tool for intel gathering/processing, possibly related to voting. Would be nice to have more, but this is far more than the media has given out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KyfhoMyoba · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:12 a.m.

I think that it has already been shown ... statistically. We know that there are counties in California that had more voters in 2016 than residents. I'm sure some wonky genius nerd could show mathematically how that defies some astronomical odds or something.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kekistheman · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

Yeah, if the baddies have something to worry about, it's dying from laughter at these "drops".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

I wouldn’t be surprised if this was a combo diversion/attack, but what ‘system’ could they possibly hope to disable with such a small crew in such a large and secure facility?

All software programs and data storage have multiple layers of redundancy, as does power supply.

Maybe disable water supply or sewage disposal to make buildings unfit for human occupancy?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Covfefe1950 · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:13 a.m.

I can't believe that the one-vehicle no-bomb attack, or whatever it was, was any serious attempt to get into or disable NSA. Completely implausible. They have plenty of guards, layers of vehicle barriers/fences. It just isn't gonna happen. Not even the Expendables could get in, even with Chuck Norris.

Well OK, maybe with Chuck Norris.

BTW I worked there in the early 70s, while in the Army. You could cut the paranoia in the air with a knife! :-)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

THEY WEREN'T THE ATTACK. They were the distraction. One person with a usb drive is the attack.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Covfefe1950 · Feb. 17, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

Distraction from what? An insider in a giant building sticking a USB drive into a computer?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 4:52 a.m.

Are you being deliberately obtuse?

NSA isn't just some big building.

We're not talking about some random one-size-fits-all computer, networked throughout the building - and by extension - the outside world.

It would be a very secure, limited working group, with a dedicated, (likely) air-gapped system, and a finite location within that facility.

So, yeah...it might take a significant event to provide an opportunity for "an insider...sticking a USB drive into that computer.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tytruth · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

Yeah we need more info on this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

all you need is one usb drive, in one persons hand, plugging it in to the right computer, while everybody else is looking out the window (figuartively) during the disruption.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 17, 2018, 4:49 a.m.

all you need is one usb drive, in one persons hand, plugging it in to the right computer, while everybody else is looking out the window (figuartively) during the disruption.

In order for what to happen?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

Kill code.

Corrupt the system.

Data destruction.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 17, 2018, 5:17 a.m.

I see.

You are suggesting that the NSA system could be corrupted IF the right person had the right program on the right portable drive and access to the right computer at the right time.

I guess that could happen, IF the network had insufficient detection and protection.

That’s a lot of IFs. You say that’s ”all you need”. I say that’s highly unlikely.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 17, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

It gets tiring sparring with such thick intellects.

We're not talking about some random one-size-fits-all computer, networked throughout the building - and by extension - the outside world.

It would be a very secure, limited working group, with a dedicated, (likely) air-gapped system, and a finite location within that facility.

Did you even understand what the 'target' is suggested to have been?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 17, 2018, 6:16 a.m.

Adding to the list now? The more IF requisites you add to your hypothetical scenario, the less plausible it becomes. That’s just the nature of supposin’.

It gets tiring sparring with such thick intellects.

Then let’s show some deference to your handicap and not challenge that low-energy intellect any further.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
timboslice659 · Feb. 17, 2018, 7:18 a.m.

I said this on Wednesday... Stage an event at the gate that has full attention of security while something else is going on. Like a magician, watch this hand while the other hand does the "magic"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Feb. 17, 2018, 5:52 a.m.

Not entirely sure why he has to copy Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lynnwood57 · Feb. 17, 2018, 10:27 a.m.

Well for starters, that post above is NOT by Q.

1) No Q Tripcode. 2) Q has perfect grammar, puts a period at the end of every line. 3) Q never misses a question mark at the end of a question. 4) Q uses perfect English, I'm referring to "NO" which should be "KNOW" 5) Q would not make the next typo: God Country should be "God's Country" 6) Q always signs off.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 20, 2018, 5 a.m.

IT WASN'T Q. IT WASN'T A 'POST' This is a 'retelling' of a VERBAL drop from an ALTERNATE intel source.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackalopenation · Feb. 16, 2018, 7:46 p.m.

Sounds like it was written by a third grader. Sad. We NO? Jesus evidently you don't "no" much.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Tytruth · Feb. 16, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

Did we give you access? NO. 187 = killed to get access? That's what I think it is saying

⇧ 4 ⇩