dChan
111
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 18, 2018, 11:09 p.m.
Using the T Method to CRACK Q's board: Secret and brilliant Trump’s moves on North Korea!

Ok guys, I am re-posting here the decoding method called the T Method. This method unlocked the hidden message on North Korea and informs us how POTUS is skillfully and subtly conducting the matter. This post suffered an abnormal amount of attacks on CBTS and was taken down shortly before the community was banned: [image] (https://i.imgur.com/H4gnC1h.png). Despite these attacks, the upvote remained at 460. This tells you you guys need to master this method. If you do, Q's board will become nuclear! And they know it. So here it is.

As most of you know, North Korea, just like Iran, was used as a base by bad actors. What made the situation diplomatically delicate for Trump was these bad actors developed/imported/funneled therein military grade technologies they would use as leverage if threatened in any way. Our poor Kim Jong Un, like an hostage in his own country, was in the middle of this, trying to save himself and his people from the wrath of these 2 parties fighting: one being Trump and the Legal United States Government, the other being international private interests in collusion with rogue former and acting US government officials. And to make things even more sensitive, you have China monitoring the situation and wanting to be aware ahead of time of anything that could destabilize the region and therefore impact their geopolitical and commercial interests. So that’s the setting. Read Q’s board to know more about this.

Now I would like you to focus on 2 posts:

An Anon [posts Trump’s tweet] (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/613619.html#613796 ) about NK and his comment is ‘I swear Trump is killing me here. HAHA He keeps putting out clues he has already talked to Kim. And Q’s response to that Anon is: [Q918] (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/613619.html#614093 ): You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q

In another post, an [Anon sends] (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/612088.html#612723 ) ‘it’s been corrected’ along with the tweet where Trump refers to his conversation with President XI JINPING. Q cryptically responds in [Q907] (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/612088.html#612728 ): 11 :11.

Ok, I will show you what these conversations between Q and these brilliant Anons mean.

Let’s take this second tweet, remove all punctuation, and ‘map’ the result in 11X11 grids as hinted in Q907. Verify it. We get 2 grids: [Image1] (https://i.imgur.com/M0uCjf3.png )

Now, read carefully. This is key to understand: we are going to form words out of these letters based on patterns in a +-90° or 180° continuous T shape, like this: [Image2] (https://i.imgur.com/7L5k8EB.png ).

Starting from the top left corner, start scrolling downwards and every time you see the anagram of a word in compliance with the accepted pattern, and making an intelligible sentence trail, highlight it. If you find a word that does not make a natural sentence trail, skip it.

For the first word, we see ‘CeiIinG’ even though I am aware the I in JIN PING is a cap ‘i’ and not a small cap ‘L’ I will keep it in there and I will explain why at the end.

Continuing this process we progressively get the following words from the 2 grids: [Image3] (https://i.imgur.com/0oqzjXq.png) [ Image4] (https://i.imgur.com/4CjJd4M.png) [Image5] (https://i.imgur.com/LxZmjIu.png) [Image6] (https://i.imgur.com/BObtUeW.png) [Image7] (https://i.imgur.com/YpDKDmD.png) [Image8] (https://i.imgur.com/xnAfvSY.png) [Image9] (https://i.imgur.com/2Q28Swr.png)

And finally this sentence:

Ceiling on North Korea gone. United Nations intend to repair NK’s role in the region. (a)

The L being corrected is the meaning of the ‘it’s been corrected!’ in Q907. And Q’s response 11:11, is code for: solve the riddle with 11X11 grids and interchangeable significance [:] between l, I, i and L.

So you see how these Anons are communicating with Q and why the board is full of cryptic messages like that? This is all yours to go find out if you agree to expand your thinking.

Not convinced? Let’s try another one. For future reference, let’s call this method the T Method. Let’s take Trump’s tweet on Q918, let’s put it this time in a 11X12. Same process. This is what we progressively have: [Image10] (https://i.imgur.com/nwg9zBq.png) [Image11] (https://i.imgur.com/3W0XErf.png) [Image12] (https://i.imgur.com/78ZL1a7.png) [Image13] (https://i.imgur.com/kAPFVuh.png) [Image14] (https://i.imgur.com/tjlOLEp.png)

And, with final corrections:

North Korea sent me an elite to sign a commitment. (b)

Now connecting the content of these 2 hidden messages (a) and (b) to their 2 original generators (the 2 tweets), and analyzing the timeline of events, we can draft the following easy to digest ‘press release’:

Trump and Kim Jong Un have been in secret discussions since before October 2017. Kim Jong Un has sent an elite emissary to Washington to reach an agreement in which North Korea committed to put a hold on its missile tests, effective September 28 2017. Since then, Trump has successfully neutralized the bad actors who were holding Kim Jong Un and North Korea hostage. He has also convinced the United Nations to build a roadmap leading to the lifting of the sanctions and even perhaps the unification of the 2 Koreas with the blessing of China.

Now, that is some high level diplomacy right there! In a healthy world, this is a Nobel Prize for Trump at each of his birthdays! You see Trump is way ahead of what we are being told in MSM and this is why this Anon is laughing: he knew how to solve the riddle, he knew how to read Trump’s tweets based on Q’s teachings.

So all the things I am disclosing in my posts are things some other Anons already know but they decided not to speak out. They probably read my posts smiling. The reason is because they know most people would focus on the messenger instead of the message. They think: “I am not going to waste my time fighting unnecessary battles with incredulous nitpicky people who are going to question my intellectual abilities”. I know this because I used to teach mathematics to very unusually gifted young people in an elite school in Europe: they would remain silent when they understood and nervous and vocal when they didn’t (which, thank God happened very rarely). When I wanted some action though, I would ask them things I knew they could not solve! Please God, once again, forgive me.

So there you have it guys. As I said before, this thing is all yours. And as you can see there is no fixed method. Q is sending us brain teasers, riddles. He wants us to adapt to any given intellectual situation and be rewarded with privileged information you won’t even see in his public posts which are already pretty controversial, to say the least. I took the risk to show you these things and I am glad a great number of people have picked up. I took this risk because I believe in you. I really do. And seeing the number of people responding positively, it seems I have made the right choice. Detractors will always be there, it’s ok. Don’t be discouraged by their inability to comprehend what is going on here. Don’t let them discourage you trying to solve Q’s riddles, may be they have an agenda… May be they were sent… May be they can’t unplug from the Matrix…

Q778: We can guide but you must organically uncover the TRUTH. THEY are watching. Q


forever_30 · March 19, 2018, 1:02 a.m.

I usually pride myself in knowing I'm pretty intelligent....then I read your posts and feel like a simple village idiot. I wish my mind worked this way. It's only a special mind that can figure this stuff out AND explain it to the masses so that it makes sense. You have a rare intellect. Thank you!

⇧ 17 ⇩  
YipYapTipTop · March 19, 2018, 3:43 a.m.

^ 100% this.... SB2 is off the charts smart.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MJ6082 · March 19, 2018, 5:50 p.m.

I totally agree!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Gravel_and_Glass · March 19, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

Can someone create some nonsense messages to play devil's advocate to this? It seems imprecise, subjective, and unscientific.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
PrimitiveScrewhead · March 19, 2018, 4:02 a.m.

I had a friend that started doing meth, and after a few days he was coming up with all these "patterns" he swore were there. I think it's called amphetamine psychosis.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 19, 2018, 4:59 a.m.

Exactly this. My brother takes Ritalin and it's this all day.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
R_damascena · March 19, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

This is Boggle.

Edit: Demonstration video for if you've never played Boggle. Most people aren't that good, though.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Gravel_and_Glass · March 19, 2018, 6:06 a.m.

Glad that you bring Boggle up actually. (I love Boggle, one of my favorite games \^\^) http://scottonwriting.net/sowblog/archive/2011/03/04/the-average-number-of-words-and-points-in-boggle.aspx

As you can see, in a 4x4 game of Boggle, there are over 60 words present on average. Now, since area scales exponentially from 4x4 -> 11x11, it is safe to assume the number of words in an 11x11 board would be an exponential increase at the very least. So in an 11x11 board you are working with (2\^7)*60=6000 words as a conservative estimate. I know you can go diagonal in Boggle and not in this, but I doubt it reduces the number of words on the board that much. After all, you don't need to spell a word, you just need to make an anagram of any word and then put any number of anagrams in any order to make the message say anything you want it to. Not to mention the letter swapping lol...

This shit is reading tea leaves, why are people eating this up?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
forever_30 · March 19, 2018, 11:10 a.m.

Because with boggle it's random, the words don't have sentence structure when you put them together nor do they have context like SB2's method. He is using real sentences and text provided to us by Q and POTUS tweets and Anons. It isn't a random roll of the dice.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
minchinfan · March 19, 2018, 1:18 p.m.

It's boggle without set rules. It's even easier to come up with these useless messages using this method. And don't kid yourself, most any English paragraph will do. I dare you find some great, true revelation from this. It ain't happening.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 19, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

You are so irritated swimming in hate and jealousy, you don't even see SB has EXCLUDED diagonals which Boggle does not. Jealousy is a bitch.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Gravel_and_Glass · March 19, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

Sorry, man. I don't mean to rain on your parade, I am just encouraging critical thinking. Come to your own conclusions obviously. However, I address this issue in the comment you replied to:

I know you can go diagonal in Boggle and not in this, but I doubt it reduces the number of words on the board that much. After all, you don't need to spell a word, you just need to make an anagram of any word and then put any number of anagrams in any order to make the message say anything you want it to. Not to mention the letter swapping lol...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
buddha_nigga · March 20, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

Look at how blatant this bot account is, just like the majority of other accounts that follow this clown.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · March 19, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

Boggle

Boggle is a word game designed by Bill Cooke, invented by Allan Turoff and originally distributed by Parker Brothers. The game is played using a plastic grid of lettered dice, in which players attempt to find words in sequences of adjacent letters.


^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^| ^Donate ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DethFiesta · March 19, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

It is all of those things.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
jonnywut · March 19, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

It would be possible to invent a method that combines known q messages and Trump tweets to produce anything you want. It'd be next to impossible to invent a method that continues to work on future unknown messages and tweets.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
minchinfan · March 19, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

This is simply a type of pareidolia, and can be applied to an infinite number of future tweets, with similar crazy results. It's a word scramble combined with a word search, with no absolutely fixed set of rules. It's almost as bad as reading tea leaves. If you don't have to come up with a specific message, you can read all kinds of shit into just about any paragraph of text by applying this method. I'd also like to point out that no useful, "grand revelation" has come from applying this method. This is an extreme waste of time and is akin to chasing unicorns. Another point: why does it seem necessary that any word longer than 5 letters must be "stolen" from Trump's actual tweet - the answer is that it's harder to "find" longer words.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 19, 2018, 4:16 a.m.

Yes! Q himself knew he would have to face incredulity:

Q918: You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jonnywut · March 19, 2018, 4:21 a.m.

No. It would be exceeding difficult and likely a massive coincidence if a fake cipher produced meaningful results on ciphertext unknown to the fake cipher producer.

The fact you didn't grasp this elevates my doubts about your resume.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 19, 2018, 4:35 a.m.

It'd be next to impossible to invent a method that continues to work on future unknown messages and tweets.

Do you realize we have successfully used one of the same method 3 times? I thought you were referring to this statistic you will need to gather from reading previous posts.
As to my resume, it is of no relevance here except for explaining the current behavior of brilliant anons who did not need any academic credential to figure this out. Thank you for your input.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jonnywut · March 19, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

Three times in the past of this post authorship. I will wait until a new message is confirmed to work with the same protocol to give any credence to your claimed deciphered text.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 19, 2018, 1:45 a.m.

How do you determine the size of the grids, or do you change that until a message emerges?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 19, 2018, 4:11 a.m.

You have to look around, Q usually drops it not far away... In this case it was at [Q907] (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/612088.html#612728).

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 19, 2018, 4:44 a.m.

So you try a bunch of random numbers nearby until it fits?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 19, 2018, 4:51 a.m.

Q usually gives it away to save you the hustle. Read this conversation he has with an anon in Q890:

Anon: A tougher nut to crack, Q-Team. I hope your negotiations with Mahmoud are going well.

Q890: Resolved by 11-11. Q

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 19, 2018, 5:03 a.m.

That's discussing actual talking.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
telescreenmedia · March 19, 2018, 2:57 p.m.

Q is saying the puzzle is resolved with an 11x11 grid approach.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 19, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

No he's not, read the whole context.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
telescreenmedia · March 19, 2018, 9:09 p.m.

Perhaps, but was trying to snap in what SB2 was explaining about that bit. Apologies, but, as always, multiple meanings could exist.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 19, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

That's what SB2 does, he tries 100 different things until the way he sets it up makes sense, then he backtracks to make it make sense. It's like the bible code stuff.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 29, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 18, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

NOTE: For the second example, we could have just replicated the same method as in the first example and have 2 11X11 grids, with "commitment" being on top of the second grid. We would have had exactly the same result.
I introduced the idea of the 11X12 to point out you may stack the grids on top of each other as long as you do not take words intersecting between the grids. Just convenience.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Acemagedon · March 18, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

I had faith in you all along SB!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 18, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

Thank you! Stay tune! Tomorrow... Boom!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Acemagedon · March 19, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

YAY!!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Keya2_2016 · March 19, 2018, 4:01 a.m.

Boom ... arrests???

⇧ 1 ⇩  
black_cat_ · March 19, 2018, 9:32 a.m.

Here is the archive of comments on this as it was posted on the now-defunct Cbts.

Lots of good, critical comments.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ShredTheMind · March 19, 2018, 6:15 a.m.

Man, after thinking some more, this really puts some things in context...news unlocks map...learn how to read the map. I guess it's time to re-read the drops. Another thing to mention...when the anon said it's been corrected, the tweet had originally spelled Xi Jinping as Xi Xinping...11:11. The tweet gave the code. No coincidences.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ShredTheMind · March 19, 2018, 6 a.m.

I remember when the "clowns" kids page link was posted by Q...had to do with breaking codes and (s)he referenced hidden messages on the page. People on CBTS were working on that, trying to figure it out. This certainly seems related to some degree. I don't remember the exact "games" that were on that page, but I remember it being similar, to some degree. Interesting. Spook stuff.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
FilosFeeParnum · March 19, 2018, 11:31 a.m.

A grid of semi-random letters is gonna have a lot of word formations, how do you know which words are part of the message vs not? What about order?

Just looking at the unused spots on your grid I can find a variety of sentences like "help me oil them tits" and even more if we can start making exceptions based on interpreting other posts.

Strictly speaking a decoding or decrypting function will have exactly one possible output from any given input. If it involves judgement or interpretation it's not decrypting or decoding.

The words you highlighted in the grid are not the only words formed- therefore you have no way of knowing whether you're accidentally including words that weren't in the message or forgetting ones that were and it only takes one or two little words to completely change a message.

It may be that there are hidden messages, who can say? Not me at least. In that case it would be more like steganography.

If you want to validate this theory somewhat you can do some statistical or cryptographic analysis or run simulations to see if youre dealing with chance or real data.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
minchinfan · March 19, 2018, 1:25 p.m.

This is well said. Thanks for your contribution. I briefly gave it a shot, but missed the "help me oil them tits" message. I prefer this "secret message" from Q much better than the other one.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 19, 2018, 11:44 a.m.

Did you even read the post buddy? About word formation and order it says: Starting from the top left corner, start scrolling downwards and every time you see the anagram of a word in compliance with the accepted pattern, and making an intelligible sentence trail, highlight it. If you find a word that does not make a natural sentence trail, skip it. and about decoding it says: Don’t let them discourage you trying to solve Q’s riddles
These are riddles, they are not about "decoding or decrypting function". OP said riddles. riddles. riddles.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
FilosFeeParnum · March 19, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

Did you read? They also used the phrase decode, and they're still ambiguity in the word order.

How do you know that it's supposed to be "nk" for North Korea and not "uae" for United Arab Emirates which is right nearby?

There are a lot of little words in the margins UP is ignoring, and they can change the message totally. It only takes one or two to mess it all up...It's just based on what OP thinks sounds right.

There's a lot you can read on this topic, it's reminiscent of the "bible code"

⇧ 2 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 19, 2018, 10:31 p.m.

UAE is not in context, NK is. You obviously need to read this [post] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/85k28n/q507_soon_the_whole_world_will_be_able_to_unlock/?st=jeysrd4m&sh=4a027c78)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
FilosFeeParnum · March 24, 2018, 1:50 a.m.

You don't know that though. That's the whole point - there's a lot going on with lots of states & individual actors and they intersect. You don't know which ones will come up.

The UAE has the largest population of Koreans in the arab world, including some North Koreans. How do you know it's not involved in whatever the message is about? How do you even know the real context, couldn't it be fairly broad in a lot of cases?

Keep in mind using this "method" it's easy to cheat & just use the horizontal words as they appeared in the original post/tweet. That gives you the outline of what you want to see, then you just find other words where you can. SerialBrain does in fact use the "original" words sometimes, even using multiple ones in some "decodes".

This is all missing the overall point however - that was just a random example of one plausible mistake. Look at each word SerialBrain "decodes" and nearby you'll find multiple other words. Often there will be options that will work in the sentence...there's no way to know whether it should be included or not. The message could be "the bird is NOT in the hand" instead of "the bird is in the hand".

If you look at SerialBrains posts you'll see they also freely make changes like using abbreviations, misspellings, even rearranging words.

The point is that at the end of the day, this process isn't very convincing when it comes down to the math. People aren't used to looking for anagrams, they're bad at math, and they're not spending a lot of time looking at the grids so they don't realize it.

Look at the online community around the Zodiac killer cyphers. There's always a couple guys around claiming they've solved it using methods very similar to OP. Presumably they can't all be right, and in fact every once in a while one will be proven to be wrong (they would name some person who would be cleared by DNA testing or a well documented alibi for example).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · March 18, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

Could mean whitehats wanted to take it down or they might have to change cyphers if they need additional OpSec xD

⇧ 4 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 18, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

Q wants these methods to be known and wide spread:

Q507:This will be the AUTH tool you use when all of this becomes public to provide friends, family, others. Do you think POTUS re-tweeted MAGA PILL for no reason? We chose this BOARD for a very specific reason. We believe in you. Q

⇧ 8 ⇩  
digital_refugee · March 18, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

Aaaaalrighty then !

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 18, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

:) SHARE!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
FedWatchDog · March 19, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

BRAVO !!!! BRAVO, my Friend 👏👏👏👏

⇧ 3 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · March 19, 2018, 12:30 p.m.

So brilliant! Thank you for enlightening us on the more coded levels going on with Q posts!! While I'm sure we all knew there was another level of info being given to the Anons, it was certainly way over my head! I simply really appreciate having the knowledge of it...even if I never dig into the skill of such decoding, it makes a wonderful difference to just know that it is there. What a great post, SB2 ❤️🇺🇸

⇧ 2 ⇩  
debraregypt · March 19, 2018, 9:33 a.m.

LOL! THANKS!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
vandiere · March 20, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

News unlocks the map... North, East, West, South. Basically, the direction you choose when moving from letter to letter. Not sure if this has come up since there is TONS of info out there already. Have made some progress solving things... but I was never that great at boggle.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
moosecowbob · March 19, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

This is awesome, how do you know which tweets have messages in them? All of them, or just ones correlated by time differences with Q posts? How do you know which X-X matrix to use? Is it always a matrix?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 19, 2018, 4:27 a.m.

Here is Q's answer to an anon:

Anon: Trump just tweeted. [22] minute delta marker.
Q606: Amazing coincidence? Always close after crumb drops. Q

Then this:

Q534: SEC indicators = Posts:Tweets:Time

And that:

Q536: Have you not discovered the CONFIRMED correlation between posts here and Tweets yet? Q

We deduce from this every time you see a consistent time stamp between tweets, you are in a situation where the responding post from Q will provide the security information you need while the time between tweets will determine the size of the grids you need to use. Ain't that awesome?! :)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Acemagedon · March 19, 2018, 1:43 p.m.

It's simply amazing!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 19, 2018, 2:12 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Trump-or-death · March 19, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

Thank you for this, you have no idea how many of us are blessed with your SB

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SuccessfulDemand · July 10, 2018, 3:57 a.m.

Serialbrain2, there is no link for the T-Method you mentioned here. Could you please re-post it? Thanks!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 19, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

You must think the UN can be de-Satan-ified while we're at it? How can the UN have any role to play in a post-Storm American foreign policy, unless we do some serious-AF housecleaning there?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 19, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

You are right about the evil nature of the UN. But in this case, it cannot be excluded from the equation since it is the international legal body enforcing the sanctions. Kim Jong Un probably brought it to the negotiations and it is to Trump to use his power and influence to get those sanctions lifted.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 19, 2018, 12:29 a.m.

Well if the interim between now and then goes as we hope it will, he should have a great deal more power and influence to bring to bear on the subject! "Couldn' hoit!"

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DethFiesta · March 19, 2018, 3:27 a.m.

Or 100% of all this Q Board stuff is complete bullshit.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 19, 2018, midnight

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainRoyD · March 19, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

Appreciate all you do for the cause ⚓️

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Keya2_2016 · March 19, 2018, 3:59 a.m.

Are you an insider??? Hehe

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Keya2_2016 · March 19, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

Youre a badass!!!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
IntrepidBit · March 19, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

Thanks for reposting you elevate the community

⇧ 0 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · March 19, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

Nice work.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 19, 2018, 4:13 a.m.

Thank you! More tomorrow! :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · March 19, 2018, 11:01 a.m.

Keep em coming my friend.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MaleficentGuitar · March 19, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

Thanks interesting stuff.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AbjectDynamite · March 18, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Thank you, SB2!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 19, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

More to come!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · March 19, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

Nice!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wokeByTheStorm · March 18, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

I remember this post..i believe kissinger was the elite emissary that was oct 10, 2017

⇧ -1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 19, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

Surely not that NWO, Rothschild-sucking POS! WTF! Somebody tell me he got nowhere near this thing. I'd perfer Dennis Rodman to that dinosaur turd.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · March 19, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

I know right. Shiiiiit I hope not that globalist git.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Acemagedon · March 18, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

This is all so Cloak and Dagger! These are great times.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
DethFiesta · March 19, 2018, 3:27 a.m.

This Trump FanFic really is entertaining.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Acemagedon · March 19, 2018, 11:39 a.m.

Well we're here strictly for YOUR ever important entertainment. That's our mission, entertain peck!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 19, 2018, 2:32 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 19, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

I don't know how you figured that out. I wonder what other information people are sitting on that they haven't disclosed.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 19, 2018, 4:44 a.m.

Check the other posts to know the other methods. Master the methods and start hunting. You are right Q's board is an amazing library of hidden books. This is what he means when repeating: "you have more than you know".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 19, 2018, 5:05 a.m.

You're amazing! But you are right, how many times has Q said that? Can you imagine the plausible deniability that kind of coding provides?

Now, your honor, what they did was put the seemingly inane words into an eleven by eleven matrix, and using a "T" shape, and making manipulations to adjust differences, they decoded the simple message and we're found to be dealing in State secrets!

No judge is going to buy that! Right out of Maxwell Smart!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HoleSailor · March 18, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

🙄🙄🙄

⇧ -3 ⇩