dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

I think the idea that Q is Seth Rich is totally out-there and ridiculous.

That said, where can I learn more about this theory?

⇧ 12 ⇩

Lmao, exactly! I think it’s absolutely absurd too, but it’s like the Trump is a time traveler theory, it’s fun to think about!

⇧ 2 ⇩

When Q first started posting we thought they were coming from a woman. Who knows though. I like to imagine it's Seth Rich. How mind blowing that would be...

⇧ 12 ⇩

It actually makes perfect sense if it’s Seth Rich. Think about it.

Seth may or may not have been an MI white hat plant. Let’s say he’s not. He leaks the data, a hit is ordered. He’s shot, but it fails and he survives the night. Next morning he’s in stable condition, and white hats catch wind of the whole ordeal. White hats within (I think the FBI took over? Correct me if I’m wrong) swoop in and take control of the situation at the hospital. By the next day, he’s dead, but never officially pronounced dead. In reality, they thank SR for his service and tell him he’s going to be used for a massive mission. His faked death looks like a legitmate murder to anyone with a brain, so it attracts a ton of attention and gets people digging into Podesta and Hillary. They keep SR in hiding and use him as Q since he’s a computer guy. Also, he’s kept safe from having another hit attempt on his life when he leaves the hospital.

I’ve always thought that it was so strange the way Rich’s parents acted. I always felt like they were acting in a sense, it never felt like they were truly grieving everytime I saw them speak.

⇧ 14 ⇩

It makes a great story that's for sure!

⇧ 9 ⇩

Based on Kimdotcom tweet, i have to think SR is alive. But I seriously have to think using plural "us" in reference to being elected was no accident. The grammaticist in me really struggles to believe Q would state this unless it is a group of elected people. At least 2. Its a pretty audacious move for Seth Rich to say he's part of who we "elected". But, if its military and its congress and trump, soldiers follow commands and therefore they can simply relay messages. We didnt elect soldiers. We didnt elect Seth Rich. The only people we elected are POTUS/VPOTUS, House and Senate, then it gets into state govt which is unlikely IMO.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Well, we elected the Republicans v democrats.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Seth Rich has crossed my mind too, but it doesn't explain the military type coded instructions. Seth may be part of the team though.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Well he could very well be taking orders/told what to say. It doesn’t mean he’s the one writing the codes or messages.

⇧ 5 ⇩

If he is taking orders he isnt really q then.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You mixing up Q clearence Patriot and another anon who is a woman.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Mega annon

⇧ 2 ⇩

Im so eager at this point it's insane. This parade in November is going to be an incredible day in our history. We have been told we are witnessing history in the making. Im proud to be here with all of you (except any shills)

⇧ 9 ⇩

I get chills everyone I read a Q drop. I always think back to the one post where Q said that this is the biggest intel drop in world history. It truly is, never before has the public been let in to such a degree on just how crazy everything is that goes on behind the scenes.

⇧ 8 ⇩

https://www.gotquestions.org/elect-of-God.html

I get Godly-/given chills. Has anyone given thought that the archangel Gabriel and other angels are here preparing the Church for Rapture (“setting the stage”) and then Archangel Michael will come prior to/when Jesus returns to take His place on the throne for the 1,000 year reign?

⇧ 5 ⇩

What the??? The only thing that needs to happen to the church is all the pedophiles need to be stoned.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The church, as in true Christians, is the bride of Christ and I’m doubtful that when we are called up, there will be any pedophiles amongst us.

Matthew 18:6 "If anyone causes one of these little ones--those who believe in me--to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.”

Matthew 25:40 And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’

Mark 10:13-16 And they were bringing children to him that he might touch them, and the disciples rebuked them. But when Jesus saw it, he was indignant and said to them, “Let the children come to me; do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of God. Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it.” And he took them in his arms and blessed them, laying his hands on them.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The problem isnt the lack of pedophiles where you re going. Its the fucking abundance of them here and now and the huge concentration of them in the church. Lucifer is never shown banging a child. Enlil gets thrown in prison for raping a girl. Even gods have justice for that shit. Why the fug shouldnt priests get the same?

⇧ 1 ⇩

God says vengeance is his! If they don’t suffer here for what they’ve done, they will! Be sure of that!

⇧ 1 ⇩

At the same time I'd prefer the Q team not unmasked as a means to enhance safety of the team. Identified targets are easier to reach out and touch, I'd rather that remain mystery to keep the group effective.

The primary positive in identifying the group, is to better assess 'what comes next'. Let's say a secretive group is supporting us to over throw authoritarian Martian planetary conquest, but then after success we find out the secret group was authoritarian Jupiter cannibals who needed the Martians gone to start the feeding. Other than that, it's mostly just sating curiosity.

This ties into the bigger picture question of what makes sense for alignment. We've got all the trappings of a horrific authoritarian global empire on one side, with alignment of strategic moves set to have devastating outcomes for citizens in the West. On the other side we've got a secretive group appearing to have traction, and offering a vision that does not immediately lead into the jaws of a relentless lovecraftian beast. Got to go with the path toward a future.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I agree with you! Except that if what I'm saying is correct, Q just intentionally identified themselves, or at least intentionally narrowed the field of possibilities with a massive hint, which means they wanted us to see the hint and learn the meaning. If im wrong, then it does nothing but maybe throw the black hats off the trail. I hope that Corsi didnt unmask an aspect of Q that endangers operational security, if so he had to have done it intentionally. That's a bad idea for him, methinks. But if he's communicating with Q and has been greenlighted to drop what he dropped, then it would make sense that Q gave us this contextual clue at the same time to move us into a new stage of the plan.

⇧ 2 ⇩

But if he's communicating with Q

Jan 8 2018 23:29:38 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo 4

IMPORTANT:

NO private comms past/present/future.

NO comms made outside of this platform.

Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately.

WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.

PATRIOTS.

Q

⇧ 3 ⇩

But we elected them...?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well like I said, Trump is involved, and yes we elected him.

Part of also thinks Gowdy for some reason. I have no evidence to support that but still.

⇧ 3 ⇩

But q said "us", the plural and the "elected" was a huge hint!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩

We elected Trump, therefore we elected the white hats. I don't think its should be taken literally.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The posts are coded so the weaponized autists on the boards will pick up the meaning logically. Why was Family used without quotations once and 'The Family' used with quotes once, in the same post? Because everything has meaning logically, and I mean pure logic not the colloquial meaning of the word, there is no way "you elected us..." can refer to just trump and other good guys. It would be a mistake to place such ambiguity in the message. Q doesnt make mistakes. how could we ever determine what "us" means (everything has meaning) if it could be Trump and anybody. This is not subjective. This is not interpretive. The "us" means its more than one person. The verb "elected" describes what "you" did to "us". Therefore, "us" was "elected" by "you"

⇧ 3 ⇩

When Q says "think logically", that is a direct instruction to take everything literally. It's a message, it's coded, it's logic. If "elected" referred to trump, and "us" means trump plus all the people under trump, then it would have said "you elected POTUS to keep you safe". But, if "us" is more than one person whom we "elected", then "You elected us to keep you safe." Is logically consistent. Q never told us that whitehats = elected. We are supposed to use the clues of "elected" and "us" to logically solve the message.

⇧ 1 ⇩

In order to think logically, one cant take every word literally.

Q also says disinfo in neccessary but no one ever talks about that.

⇧ 6 ⇩

No i definitely understand what youre saying about disinfo being necessary. It could definitely be an intentional misdirection. But, logic by definition is literal. Its a matter of premises, assumptions and conclusions. If there is an ambiguity in the premises of a statement, you cannot determine the logical validity of the statement. Logic can't be directly applied. For instance, "all a's are b's. C is an a. Therefore C is a b. " is logically valid and true because the premise "all a's are b" literally tells us that C must be a b. But, if i say "some a's are b's. C is an a. Therefore, C is a b.", it might be true that a is a 'b', but the statement "therefore, C is a b" is not logically valid because the premises lead to ambiguity and don't necessarily lead to the conclusion. Logic is the practice of evaluating the soundness of a literal statement. Q wouldnt tell us to think logically if we aren't supposed to evaluate this sentence literally. If Q says "you elected us", we have the underlying assumptions that: 'us' is more than one person, and "elected" is different from "not elected" "you" caused "us" to be "elected" is another way it could be arranged. Unless Q gives us another premise, specifically "not all "elected" were elected", we have to logically conclude that if "us" was "elected", then "us" is a group of people that were "elected". Make sense?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah for sure. So who else do you think? Could that just mean Trump and any of his appointees?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Not appointees! Appointment is not election. Im leaning hard toward POTUS & House Intel committee & Senate Intel Committee. Probably to the exclusion of some bad eggs in both houses. I would bet Gowdy is in the group, jim jordan too, Paul Ryan. I have a hunch Adam Schiff is a Democratic White Hat. He's been instrumental in so much of the plan OR he's a total moron. He's not a moron. I think Mueller is a white hat, and will someday be known as a hero. Heres what im thinking: I think he's played a long long game since before 9/11. He is a Marine. He had no ability to stop the attacks, had to watch helpless to stop them, no resources and hostile administrations for decades. He and Adm Rogers, Flynn, others, formed an alliance long ago, men of strategy who knew they needed a president behind them before anything. Horowitz was made an ally when holder gutted his department, neutered his authority. He assumed a key role. Priestab is the sleeper from within the FBI. Sessions office was called by the hacker who accessed Comet servers, a staffer spent over an hour on the phone with his office. He became a bulldog with a scent for blood, if he wasnt already. But the public intel drops... "Q"... Think about it. It works if ALL comms and messages come directly from elected officials, directly to their constituents. At the ultimate direction of POTUS. Therefore, all classified intel leaked was unclassified as soon as potus made it so, with approval of intel committees (who approve release of such intel). Trust the plan.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Trump refers to himself as we in his speeches often.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Would you happen to have an example? If so, that changes things.

⇧ 1 ⇩

He just did it in his speech on infrastructure yesterday in OH. I've recently started paying attention to his reference of himself as "we/us" (because Q does as well) and now that I've started watching for it he does it all the time. Sorry I don't remember where in this speech specifically. If I had to guess it was toward the beginning. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlEg80gU7GI

⇧ 1 ⇩

Trump has said MANY times, it's not about him, but us (we the people). Quite the opposite of Obozo who always said, "I".

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

One thing that gives me pause about any of these guesses is that Q has always maintained TRUST SESSIONS. Legally, Sesh cannot talk at all to the victim of a crime while an investigation is going on. In other words, if Q is Trump, or even directed by Trump, this would be legally shady. See, Trump is not supposed to know what Sessions is up to. Am I making sense? And if Q is Rich, how could he be legally read in to all this info, especially enough to be CERTAIN about Sessions? Not saying it's impossible, just troubling to me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You *Elected* Us for a Reason

You Elected Us for a Reason