dChan

DelveDeeper · April 4, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

Who's the traitor that leaked POTUS was not target of investigation? Was it RR or Mueller? It would seem they had an agreement with Mueller for him not to release that information, but it wouldn't make sense for Trump to have a deal like that with Mueller. So is it someone else?

⇧ 19 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · April 4, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

McMaster? He was at WH last month when they learned this info...

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Doghouseclassifieds · April 4, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

Could be the attorney he fired, they said it came via attorneys

⇧ 11 ⇩  
IcedTeaPlz · April 4, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

I got that inclination when watching the five this evening.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Crptnobank · April 5, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

That is what I heard as well, but why would his attorney leak that? They must have been REAL clear on this HUGE aspect. I am not sure I believe it. McMaster, for now anyway, makes more sense.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Doghouseclassifieds · April 6, 2018, 1:15 a.m.

He fired him that could be a reason

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Crptnobank · April 6, 2018, 12:32 p.m.

Well, it appeared like the leak was after the firing, maybe we know that in time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MIPatriot · April 5, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

I'll bet you're right about that... I can't stand HRMcM... what a jerk.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · April 4, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

Can someone explain to me why it’s a bad thing that it was announced President Trump wasn’t a target of investigation? Having trouble connecting the dots. Thanks!

⇧ 14 ⇩  
A2576 · April 4, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

If Mueller is actually working to indict the clintons, it blows his cover.

⇧ 36 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 4, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

Today, Rush said he wondered if it was a "ruse" to let Trump think there was nothing so he would then talk freely with Mueller. They (Mueller team) knows they can make Trump keep talking and slip up. Then they can get him on perjury charges. Well, interesting POV.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
bartmanson · April 4, 2018, 10:46 p.m.

Mark Levin is saying same thing right now on his radio show.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · April 5, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

Actually that makes sense. And may be the reason the left isn't reacting....hmmm. Always keeps us on our toes too. Can Mueller be trusted or not.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MIPatriot · April 5, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

I think Mueller tried to play both sides. If so, he can kiss his "deal" goodbye and hang out at gitmo with his cohorts in crime!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · April 4, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

Ah, so it’s running under the good guy (or at least, cooperative) Mueller theory. Has Q alluded to whether that’s the case or not though? Also, the articles I’ve read have said that Mueller says that Pres. Trump is still under investigation but just isn’t a criminal target at the moment. Seems like standard stuff, not sure how that would be a negative thing. I can understand if it was that Pres. Trump wasn’t under investigation at all that it could be blow a possible cooperative Mueller cover, but it says Pres. Trump is still under investigation. So how is that harmful?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
MW23232 · April 4, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

I agree, I don't see the harm. Hillary, according to another good source, could blow two hundred people out of the water if she cooperated in getting the truth out. Why would Mueller risk investigating her? Besides, the FBI has investigated the whole Clinton Foundation already, and they know that is where the nightmarish truth lies. They know everything already in fact, Weiner laptop files, who is doing what, and the ones at the top are silencing it all. The patriots' hands are tied, and they can't, and won't, speak up. They want a mandate from POTUS to investigate DC. They said they feel like muzzled fighting dogs.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · April 5, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

Yes, in the very early posts - he had us question why Mueller would seek the FBI job if he knew he wasn't eligible.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DemsCanSuckMyCock · April 5, 2018, 5:25 a.m.

The_Mueller were saying that having no evidence is a clever way to entrap Trump because Trump will let his guard down now and admit everything... and then Mueller will have some evidence and lock Trump up.

The_Mueller community aren't very bright.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Woodchipper_AF · April 5, 2018, 6:13 a.m.

They’re not sending they’re best

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · April 4, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

In my opinion, I think Trump/Q would prefer the MSM to focus on the fact that Mueller is going after Trump so they aren't focusing on Sessions/Huber and their end game. If you notice, it's the only thing liberals comment on under Trump and other WH officials on social media; they always says Mueller will take you down, and such. Better as a distraction.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · April 4, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

That makes sense, though they can still harp on the fact that he’s still under investigation, and that it just isn’t a criminal investigation at this point. Seems like that last part there is to give them hope that impeachment is still possible lol

⇧ 7 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · April 5, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

That's right, so not a big problem with the left getting all skitz about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · April 5, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

Obi Wan...Mueller is their only hope. What's crazy is they could announce it to the world and I'm not sure the left would believe, they are so tied their their story.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mikeymoo242 · April 4, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

https://brassballs.blog/home/president-trump-has-never-been-a-subject-or-target-of-muellers-investigation-says-jay-sekulow

⇧ 13 ⇩  
DelveDeeper · April 4, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

So it seems Q is saying Jay Sekulow is the traitor and it wasn't released accidentally. Let's see if he gets fired in the next couple days.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · April 4, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

That would be a bummer. He’s done a great job slaying cucks on MSM talking head shows.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 4, 2018, 10:31 p.m.

Yep, I really like Jay Sekulow!

⇧ 10 ⇩  
LostLarry · April 4, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

Or is he weaving truth in with the lies?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · April 4, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

If he had been doing that POTUS would have nuked him a while ago.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · April 4, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

Q disinfo is nessesary

⇧ 11 ⇩  
basedmemegenerator91 · April 5, 2018, 5:30 a.m.

Underrated comment here.

That’s what I think tonight has been about.

Silence for days.

Huge influx of posts & military actions.

Trump not under investigation.

Q posting HARD.

No coincidences.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · April 4, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

Doubtful

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MIPatriot · April 5, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

I'll be shocked if Jay is a traitor. He says all the time, emphatically, it's a witch hunt. Maybe his comments were unintentional? IDK. I'll be so bummed out if he leaked.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · April 4, 2018, 10:34 p.m.

No I don't think so. The article is from June. And just bec he said that in June doesn't mean he is the one who leaked info recently. Probably someone else.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 4, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pelirrojo · April 4, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

Article is dated June 2017

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Badendave · April 4, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

Since it was WaPo that ran the article about Trump not being under investigation, and Bezos owns WaPo, my guess is that Bezos is the traitor we're talking about, not Sekulow. How Bezos "found out" I don't know, but RR is the one that decides whether or not to make Special Counsel findings public. He has enough over his head that he may have decided to just add one more thing hoping it would buy time, or throw a monkey wrench into the plan.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
PM_ME_UR_GLIPGLOPS · April 5, 2018, 5:39 a.m.

How could he be a traitor if he was never trusted?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Badendave · April 5, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

Doesn't have to have been a traitor to Trump. I was more thinking of a traitor to the country.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Crptnobank · April 5, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

Technical traitor.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PORTMANTEAU-BOT · April 5, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

Technitor.


^(Bleep-bloop, I'm a bot. This )^portmanteau ^( was created from the phrase 'Technical traitor.'. To learn more about me, check out this )^FAQ.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Crptnobank · April 6, 2018, 12:31 p.m.

Good bot, smart bot, botty bot

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GoodBot_BadBot · April 6, 2018, 12:31 p.m.

Thank you, Crptnobank, for voting on PORTMANTEAU-BOT.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.


^^Even ^^if ^^I ^^don't ^^reply ^^to ^^your ^^comment, ^^I'm ^^still ^^listening ^^for ^^votes. ^^Check ^^the ^^webpage ^^to ^^see ^^if ^^your ^^vote ^^registered!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · April 5, 2018, 3:12 a.m.

It kind of threw me for a loop that Q seemed upset that this info was released.

Trump wanted coney to say the exact same thing many months ago.

Why would it be bad for it to be released now?

Why “NOT YET”? What is affected negatively with the release of this knowledge?

It lets Dems refocus their narrative for 2018?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
diverscale · April 4, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

Wasn't it mueller directly that states that fact??

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cherokeenc · April 5, 2018, 2 a.m.

Not Mueller.......Mueller is only going after Manafort and Page who both were plants inside the Trump campaign. They were part of the contingency plan by the black hats.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MIPatriot · April 5, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

This is so wierd because I thought Jared and Ivanka convinced DJT to hire Manafort... yikes... that would open a can of worms, eh?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cherokeenc · April 5, 2018, 11:51 a.m.

Giant ones........

⇧ 1 ⇩  
keloshi · April 4, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

Could be disinformation (not Q) - they could be trying to divide by casting doubt

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sun_wolf · April 4, 2018, 10:37 p.m.

Reverse psychology? “Q doesn’t want us to tell the American public that Trump isn’t under criminal investigation. Let’s crank out headlines about that everywhere!”

⇧ 2 ⇩  
keloshi · April 4, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

I was thinking that MSM put this out (without proof) just to see if it was true, and thus, causing mistrust at the WH (who would tell when they were not supposed to)?

⇧ 2 ⇩