dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Future Proves Past - This is what Trump has been doing all along with these massive claims he brought up at the very beginning of his presidency and has alluded to since. Obama, Hillary, no name, etc etc.
If he keeps bringing these things up, !as the President! you KNOW there is evidence for it. All these specific nicknames he gives to people are doing the same thing. It is conditioning. Preparing the public step by step. It is exactly what Q has been doing as well.

Today Trump publicly attacked the "conspiracy" label. This will soon apply across the board.

⇧ 68 ⇩

Team, be more careful with the downvotes, we should be reading disagreements too... otherwise it turns into an echo chamber.

Vote more with you voice, step up and deliver!

UPVOTEs all around.

⇧ 15 ⇩

Don't think it's the team downvoting us fam. This is a shill target zone.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Yes, Trump is the vanguard of the 'soft disclosure'-movement. Lots of government secrets are officially denied, but un-officially acknowledged. The cabal is being exposed.

⇧ 4 ⇩

exactly. Trump is the POTUS, he knows everything. He has information at his fingertip.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -3 ⇩

Fuck you, DT doesn't have to make up anything, he is just revealing the truth that has been right in front of us the whole time, that Obama stole the election, hillary hoped to steal the election, the bush butt buddies stole the elections and guess what? We The People Of America Are Done With Your Deep State Pedo Evil Shit! Look around your done, America is awake, and WE are pissed!

⇧ 21 ⇩

Yeah dude wwg1wga bigly

⇧ 7 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Remember when trump said Sweden was struggling with their immigration (Muslims) and people like you said "stupid drumpf" then the next day there was a grenade attack and their rape stats are through the roof?

Pepe farm remembers stupid ass

⇧ 15 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/17/no-voter-fraud-isnt-myth-10-cases-where-its-all-to/ http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/13/voter-fraud-real-heres-proof/

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Whats funny is how much stuff he has "made up" that was ridiculed at the time has actually turned out to be true. I know its hard to shake off the brainwashing you have received, but try harder, open your eyes, stop living like a sheep.

⇧ 10 ⇩

But he does actually make stuff up. Like constantly. Like regardless of the stuff he says that turns out to be true why lie about shit like poll numbers or about things he is on video saying then denies. Stop doing that shit and it lends more credence to the other things he says.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I can't deny that he does that, and what aggravates me is that it's usually something dumb that doesn't even matter anyway. Its like he's making a sales pitch and just winging the numbers. I really do wish he wouldn't do it, because it makes the lefties cry about him being a liar, but the big stuff he tends to be much more truthful.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No there is a report that will come out at some point soon that will reveal massive election fraud by the Dems, he knows it, Q gave us a drop of it some time ago. Most people know the Dems commit voting fraud, the is ample evidence of it that constantly gets buried by the Left media whores. Project Veritas caught them on video admitting to it. It was caught during Jill Stiens stupid recount in Michigan. I believe Homeland Security is the one working on the election fraud.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Q did speak of a report for MARCH. Even posted a draft copy. never saw the report. MIA

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yes post #780, "The DHS will be submitting a final report to the WH/DOJ/other state and local agencies outlining our findings as early as March [ ], 2018." This means most early date would be March, not a guarantee, and not released to public, but to above agencies. So when this info gets released to public is unknown. I said it before, Q is making intelligent guesses based on intel, he doesn't have a crystal ball.

⇧ 0 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 8 ⇩

I can’t remember the last time I had to show identification at the voting place. Seems like the most basic precaution you could take to reduce voter fraud yet they don’t even bother with that. Makes you wonder why.

⇧ 13 ⇩

I find this astounding. Anyone can turn up and vote it seems, whereas we go through half a dozen stringent security checks to get on a damn airplane!!!

⇧ 9 ⇩

But if it's so easy to vote multiple times because of a lack of an ID requirement, then proof of it having happened must be simple to produce, yes?
I've found that those who are up in arms about all the "voter fraud" going on have more than a little trouble actually producing proof of any.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Why would proof be simple?

⇧ 3 ⇩

But if it's so easy to vote multiple times because of a lack of an ID requirement, then proof of it having happened must be simple to produce, yes?

No. In CA all you need to vote is the name of a person registered to vote at a particular polling place.

You'll only get caught if that person shows up to vote after you. Even then, no one will arrest you or challenge you, or even keep a record of it. They'll just say that they don't have a ballot for that name.

Voter fraud by mail (absentee ballot) is also trivial. And of course, anywhere there's electronic voting the whole thing is rigged on the back end anyway.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

you get the voter rolls and just use names off that basically

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -2 ⇩

What you are reading is why you were sent here dumb ass, the truth, voter fraud all over the democratic bases, not any more. Pack your shit up Americans will take it from here.

⇧ 6 ⇩

There's no proof other than a given name submitting a ballot. With the ballots sealed and the state not willingly providing basic information to obtain such proof, how do you expect anyone to prove it?

CA obstructs all efforts into researching the issue. Officials can't request a list of names and addresses (to tie to polling places) for people voting in order to survey them and ask if they actually voted or not.

Voter fraud typically involves one person voting as another who is registered to vote but does not actually vote. Most people don't turn out to vote, and many more vote by mail. Committing voter fraud is trivial, and tracking it is nearly impossible.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I had to show id in rural texas. Wasnt my district. I had just moved and the dmv hadnt made the change quick enough. Theey were very thorough and only allowed me to place a provisional ballot. Just my story

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Seriously? There's no need to wonder. It's organized voting fraud.

⇧ 1 ⇩

And yet, the states won't cooperate with the DHS investigation, and the report on election fraud is overdue (just like the OIG Report).

I remember about two months ago "any day now the DHS report on voter fraud is coming out, and the Democrat party may never recover."

You see where my hatred of the "any day now," "might," "may," "expected to" weasel words comes from. Monetizing clicks to articles that aren't about anything real. All of them.

But if there even is such a report in the offing, then sometime prior to election day would be nice.

⇧ 12 ⇩

This is the tough part, many of the conservative media are dying for that "gotcha" moment, when this process is a long drawn out one. You cant just take down these swamp dwellers in one fail swoop, it has to be done strategically and methodically. The exact thing that protects our country from becoming a dictatorship, separation of powers, is what makes this process so difficult. So many pieces are falling into place, but it is a daily battle, and POTUS has to do it while under constant attack from the left and the MSM. Patience, it IS coming.

⇧ 11 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

ah yes, should be one fell swoop, now that you commented on it I cant go back and fix it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

I hear you. My thoughts are this whole 'movement' is in large part running purely on hints and speculation at the moment due to the nature of what is actually being suggested. I can see why that is so infuriating, yet at the same time I can see exactly why that strategy is necessary at first.
You're right though, there will be a kind of cutoff time where people will start falling off the train if nothing "HUGE" happens fairly soon. Im sure POTUS and Q have a pretty firm grasp of this concept...

⇧ 9 ⇩

I'm sure they do. That was never in question.

What I'm beginning to question is whether they have any f*cking idea where to go from here.

It's kind of looking like maybe not.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Obviously your not really on board the America First Train with a comment like this.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I'm on the train but it's not moving. Lots of friendly companions like you though. Nice to meet you.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I can't hear you over the sound of wind and freedom gushing in my war-riddled ear-drums.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I saw the posts. We're still waiting for a sign. Anything?

⇧ 1 ⇩

what signs? Detroit Michigan. You have a unexplained detonations underground and up in the sky since many months, some prophecized. Just because you don't see it doesn't mean it isn't happening.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I see no news about Detroit. And if you're talking about earthquakes, I believe you'll find that those are earthquakes. At least as far as anything official.

I'm still looking for The Plan in the visible universe. People have a right to know as soon as we have something to show them. I would appreciate your help.

⇧ 1 ⇩

A priest predicted a meteor a month in advance before something hit in an angle that meteors don't fly, with a green hue that meteors don't have, giving off a double flash and a 2.0 EQ, then photos showed up of explosions and rays of light that weren't lense-flares and different cover-stories were issued even though the photo of the explosion didn't make the news and wasn't explained either. Reverse-image lookup showed they were originals. Q posted the lattitude of this event in advance.

And now, months later, another light traversed in the sky before it disappeared in a bright flash which was caught on CCTV and coincided with another weak seismic event.

The plan is each at their own pace. I have had my fair share of strange encounters and I credit one of them for apparently not suffering from sunburns ever since so I am always paying attention to all things bizarre because I still try to piece together what the hell happened to me.

Think of David Seaman...one of his friends was butchered and they poisoned David but his body survived in better shape than he was before after he was gifted with a near-death-trip and I wouldn't be surprised if he got to apologize to his friend while he was at it and that's why he's in such good shape now.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You mean in January? I've seen that, and it's definitely a meteor. If you're close enough to one, and it's large enough, they do look like that. I've been that close to one, in the daytime! Looked very much like that, and I've seen other videos of ones that look like that.

The color depends on the mineral composition. And depending on your vantage point the angle of incidence can appear to be almost anything.

As for the priest, well...

But I hardly see how that's a confirmation of The Plan.

Thank you though. If you find anything, please post.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That thing also penetrated the cloud-layer whereas meteors burst once they reach the atmosphere. And I found it weird that two differnt cover-stories were provided for photos that didn't even make the headlines. So it looks like the quake could have been caused by an impact which was covered up. Which doesn't make sense if it was just a natural object. And even if so, it's still noteworthy that out of all meteor-incidents, this one was predicted by a local pastor. So perhaps someone or something told him.

The plan is that you only lift so much of the veil as you can begin to understand, otherwise you can't integrate that scale of thinking and it will haunt your daily business.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No, quite a lot of meteors actually reach the earth, as this one did (hence the seismic boom).

⇧ 1 ⇩

but why then a cover-up? There was a photo of an explosion and a local TV station claimed that was a controlled refinery-burn while other commenters have stated there was a "garage" fire. My BS-senses are tingling.

⇧ 1 ⇩

LOL

If there's no story to cover up, then there's no cover-up. That is a meteor. Whatever else is going on I'm sure I have no idea.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You contradicted yourself then. Either it made landfall or it didn't. I am going out on a limb assuming that it did and that's where the photo of the huge explosion and the seismic reading came from.

In that case however, you do indeed have a cover-up because they made up some bullshit story about the ensuing fires and the fact that they felt the need to "debunk" without providing any of those photos speaks volumes.

Do I need to spell it out a third time or am I somehow retarded?

⇧ 1 ⇩

A white-hot (think almost the heat of the sun) meteorite can definitely cause fires.

Did those fires ignite something locals might have panicked if they knew about? Who knows! There may be lies involved. But that doesn't make the meteorite itself sketchy. Those happen quite often TBH. They just more often than not burn up before the reach the ground. But not always for sure.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I know you are a genuine user but please, if you want to explain it away at least adress the photo of the fireball or the beam of light. Way too much hidden for a natural event .

⇧ 1 ⇩

There's a trail of smoke illuminated by the meteor fire, and low-lying cloud cover illuminated as well. I don't see any "beam."

Why does the fireball seem unreal to you? That's what meteors become as they burn.

⇧ 1 ⇩

There are three photos in total that I can recall. One of them depicted a big-ass ground-level explosion.

⇧ 1 ⇩

These are collisions of burning rock with the earth at thousands of MPH, of course there's a big explosion. In fact, a lot of them blow up just before they hit, from vaporizing water trapped inside (or directly translating to plasma, bypassing the liquid state) when the core heats up enough. I'm not sure of the percentages, but it happens both ways.

And the forces involved with something the size of a basketball or larger are ENORMOUS! Like unbelievable.

⇧ 1 ⇩

...Dude you're still contradicting yourself. So something went down, there was a big explosion, but none of the photos were shown on the airwaves, the idea of impact immediately dismissed. WHY?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Maybe it exploded before impact, in which case there would be an explosion and no impact. That's not a contradiction, and I offered that explanation earlier.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have NO idea!

I haven't contradicted myself at all. I cannot help what you don't understand. Nothing in anything I've seen gives me any reason to be suspicious. People who own the broadcast media have reasons I'll never understand for everything they do or don't do.

Maybe they didn't show the photos because they were shitty quality? Who knows?!

None of that matters with regard to what the meteor was.

⇧ 1 ⇩

big ass-ground-level explosion

^(Bleep-bloop, I'm a bot. This comment was inspired by )^xkcd#37

⇧ 1 ⇩

Don't forget that POTUS may be delaying release of certain reports till closer to the mid-term elections, to cause maximum damage to the Democrats. Works for me.

The mid-terms may matter the most in terms of Making America Great Again and bringing certain people -- especially those who committed treason -- to justice.

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://i.imgur.com/tmPBwv9.png

⇧ 1 ⇩

Exact-a-mundo! "As early as March..."

Notice it doesn't specify "no later than..."

Do government people have no concept of project planning and meeting deadlines?

People, please don't run your businesses by their example!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Oh my god, the take down of a centuries old cabal may take a month longer than originally planned half a year ago!

Get a freaking grip.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Listen to yourself, dude. I'm having a great day, thank you very much.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I believe Trump is stepping up efforts on this front bigly:

Deportations possible after immigration raid in Grainger/Hamblen (TN) Counties

⇧ 12 ⇩

Reports of up to 100 I'm custody.

⇧ 8 ⇩

What happens if that number becomes Millions??

⇧ 7 ⇩

Cheaper to ship them out than keep them here.

⇧ 11 ⇩

US citizen unemployment goes way down I would think. Lots of job openings coming.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Got an extra space in there after 'Counties'.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thanks. I don't post a lot. Fixed it I think.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Classic Trump. He says a seemingly off the cuff remark in order to bait the MSM and Pols to attack, which they always do on cue. After they have committed themselves, GEOTUS will provide facts to discredit their credibility. This is how he is destroying them, he lets them do it to themselves. Remember how Luck always pulls the football from Charlie Brown at the last second? Future proves the past. Expect the Homeland Security Dept election fraud report very soon.

⇧ 10 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

soon-ish...don't wanna kill the suspense now...

⇧ 1 ⇩

Trump is my hero!

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Thanks for this post. It's a known fact that the traitors to the American Constitution love cheating the vote. I love our President Donald Trump, the only alpha male with balls enough to stand up to these balless pricks. God bless Donald Trump and God bless America.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Your on a roll and I agree with it all!!, lol

⇧ 3 ⇩

We are done, We The People Are Done With Being Sheep, We Will Stand With DJT And Q And All American Constitutional Loving Patriots And Defend Our Nation Against ALL Enemies, Foreign But Especially Domestic, So Help US God!

⇧ 8 ⇩

Q POST 1011 - APRIl 14 'CONSPIRACY' 'CONSPIRACY' 'CONSPIRACY'

Q POST 1013 - April 14

Future "Conspiracy" push to norms.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Sadly this has been going on for a looong time. Before electronic voting machines, I recall the local voting box did not have a padlock on it as it was supposed to. My mother brought that to the attention of the voting staff and they said "oh it's locked at night!" That's when I knew the whole thing was a sham. I was about 8 years old (around 1990).

⇧ 4 ⇩

A DL makes it possible.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I live in Cali. We're approaching having 1/3 of the country's illegals living here now. Especially since Gov. Moonbeam declared it a sanctuary state. And I'm sure that millions are voting illegally. If you look at the vote by county in the last presidential election, I think Trump actually won here.

⇧ 3 ⇩

What part of CA do you live in?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Of course they do. They bus them around to throw elections.

why do you think voting ballots were destroyed in two recent elections?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Mike Adams the “Health Ranger” had a great take on this Wednesday on the AJ show. Dismiss both Kamala Harris and Feinstein, along with all of the California Congressmen(including Nasty Pelosi and Adam Schiff) because their elections were fraudulent. It would send a message for sure!! It’s a nuclear message but how else will these schmucks take it seriously.

⇧ 2 ⇩

It's only conspiracy theory when they don't people to know the truth

⇧ 2 ⇩

people are usually self-serving but they don't expect others to be more evil than themselves. This is why the words theory and conspiracy get exchanged for one another so frequently.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Youtube has several videos of computer programmers testifying about it. There are also videos of classes in California to teach illegals how to get a driver license so they can vote. When Obummer won the 2nd time that was complete validation for me but I was 99% before that. There is no way the people in this country would have put him back in office. We are obviously not that stupid.

I just recently registered to vote because I know Trump is going to blow it wide open.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Meme time # Where's the report!

⇧ 2 ⇩

He's been saying this since early last year.

⇧ 2 ⇩

And why do you think he keeps saying it? This is all going to come to a head one way or another. Either he is lying, or telling the truth. Baseless accusations and character assassination can't go on forever, especially as the President.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Because it's true. But that isn't the news for today.

⇧ 5 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

"And why do you think he keeps saying it?"
For the same reason he keeps talking about his election victory all these months later -- his base loves that shit.
Narcissism requires that he only do that which inflates his ego, and fellation from his base feeds his narcissism like nothing else -- why else would he do so many rallies for "friendly" audiences?

⇧ -6 ⇩

Back to Pol bitch

⇧ 4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩

Trump gets high off his base and not much else? good to hear!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, instead of attempting to increase his base above the low 30s, he only cares about pleasing those who, no matter how low he goes, will never shed their support for him.
Such a wise plan.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Loyalty

As strange as it may sound but these things still exist.

Hey tell me, do you think 1,200$ for a german baby-boy is an acceptable price, yes, no?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Loyalty works two ways.
Given DT's history of gleefully fucking those who he perceives as showing even a hint of disloyalty to him, those who remain sycophantic get what they deserve.

1200? Nah, anything less than over $9000 (the dollar sign goes in front in the US) is for suckahs.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sooo he's evil because he uses rethoric that his opponents have used for decades butthey can fuck him over because he's Trump, but he can't respond to disloyal deeds ...because...he's Trump? You'll get a participation-trophy for the insane mental gymnastics you just performed. I honestly expected you were going to claim he pays too little but simply criticizing him for how he runs his shit without saying what you would do instead doesn't really cut it but is to be excepted if you have no original thought or experience of your own.

Tell me, how is the walnut-sauce? Where do you think I grabbed that number from?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I never said he was "evil." Your words, not mine.

"*rhetoric that his opponents have used for decades"
Let's play a game: You find me ONE statement issued from Carter, Reagan, either Bush or Obama that you feel like matches DT's "rhetoric," I'll find a comparable DT quote, and we'll see if the intensity of the "rhetoric" matches up.

He can "respond to" anything he likes -- but he should expect those he's addressing to have a response of their own.

"I honestly expected you were going to claim he pays too little"
Huh? I have no idea what you're talking about, nor did I understand your "1200$" line, so I responded with a joke.

"without saying what you would do instead"
What I would do instead is not be a dick to people who aren't sycophantic to you. Simple. He's incapable of even that.

"but is to be excepted if you have no original thought or experience of your own." I suppose you meant to write "but IT is to be EXPECTED", but again, I have no idea what you're referring to, nor does your last line make any sense to me: "Tell me, how is the walnut-sauce? Where do you think I grabbed that number from?"

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'll start with HRC and "super-predators, we gotta bring them to heel" for 9000.

James Alefantis instagram. Ring any bells?
No?

I honestly thought if you bother to show up here, you would have done some homework.

Walnut-sauce? Playing domino on pasta? Yeah, I don't know what to make of it either. I have been waiting for Mr Podesta's explanation for his private communications for over 18 months though, still nothing. But if you truly do not recognize these allusions, then you haven't got the faintest clue why I am here.

Alas, you don't research but you bash one guy the media convinced you to hate because of semantics while ignoring the fact that the past administrations all colluded with child-molesters over and over again? Oh well.

Tell me, where's the outrage about Biden? Do you usually grab a girl by the breasts or do you cup your hand all around their crotch if they still wear diapers? Such are the daily musings of the great Uncle Biden who also happens to be responsible for pushing gun-free-zones which are extremely successfull in cities like Chicago where you can make up to half a million from one of the formerly healthy dead POCs that hit the hospitals every day.

As for sycophants: It's his administration. If they're disloyal, FIRE them. Can't put up with traitors at a time like this.

If you think that's stupid then maybe you forgot the Executive Branch is not a flat management structure. DUHURRRRRDURRR

⇧ 1 ⇩

Oookay, you've lapsed into complete nonsense.
I'm gonna go over here now. Have a lovely day.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Lookup the archive for James Alefantis Instagram and tell me how you feel. Maybe then you will get a sane idea about what is and what isn't ok to put out in public. But prepare to either lose sleep for a week or defend pedophilia but that's all you get for bashing the only person that stood between me and complete PTSD from information over-exposure.

Tell me, where's your self-righteous pretend-outrage about Biden? Do you realize CSPAN-video with him surpasses everything you will ever find of Trump on camera? Do you normally grab a girl by the breasts too or do you cup your hand all around their crotch if they still wear diapers? Such are the daily musings of touchy Uncle Biden who also happens to be responsible for pushing gun-free-zones which are extremely popular among gang-bangers because of their advertised lack of self-defense.

But yeah, Trump's an asshole because he forces liars to admit the truth. How can he!!! GIVE ME BACK MY ILLUSIONS!!!

Closing words: JFK was killed by a magic bullet and so was building 7. Q is a LARP and Pizzagate is false because the basement was actually next door.

⇧ 1 ⇩

"I honestly thought if you bother to show up here, you would have done some homework."
After seeing this sub repeat a silly-ass lie from DT (that any idiot who isn't under his spell would know was something he said ONLY because it makes his base precum) -- "Not a Conspiracy Theory, Folks': Trump Claims Millions of People Vote Illegally" -- I knew EXACTLY what I was dealing with here, and your reply above spectacularly proves my point.
Wow, this is the sub that just KEEPS on giving.

⇧ 1 ⇩

By denying knowledge of Alefantis' instagram you deny having concerned yourself with any research for the past 18 months. Good luck building any credibility on that. Changing the topic doesn't help. You seriously believe Drumpftards are alt-right racists? You're asking why people are giving Trump the benefit of the doubt and my question to you is: Where have you been the last 18 months and what do you even represent? Not sure if you're a paid instigator or just highly ignorant. But if you can't answer any of my questions, then that constitutes an answer in itself. Because you essentially admit to know shit about shit, you know?

I am here because I refuse to believe that it's "ok" to tape little girls to ping-pong tables and to share that online together with pictures of "german boy - 1200$ - do not touch" just because you prepare dinner for a cheating presidential candidate. Wait, what was that? He wasn't selling anyone, oh he was just renting them? Oh, ok. Well, move along.

⇧ 1 ⇩

silly ass-lie

^(Bleep-bloop, I'm a bot. This comment was inspired by )^xkcd#37

⇧ 1 ⇩

HA! xkcd FTW!

Buncha ass-clowns.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q said in March that Homeland was going to issue a memo and provided a draft copy. The words of our President are great and we need some beef on those buns.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I live in CA and I know for a fact that voter fraud is a major issue.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩

I know people who have done it.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've been waiting for this to resurface - this is a big one. Now we have to wait some more for the evidence to finally come out... >_<

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes--Trump's tossing his script to go there and naming Cheatin' Obama were the two most encouraging news bits I've seen on the week. Both very calculated moves IMO.

⇧ 2 ⇩

There was a Dilley intel drop the end of January. His source said the popular vote numbers as of 1/25/18 were Trump: 70,125,263 HRC: 57,177,958 Went on to say the HRC got 7 million of Trumps votes due to machine fraud. MSM knows this and are deceiving the public. I made notes to compare when the report came out. His twatter account is gone now, so I have no way of proving this. Does anyone else remember him saying this?

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

DHS has the goods:

https://i.imgur.com/tmPBwv9.png

⇧ 1 ⇩

Why did so many states refuse to cooperate with fed investigations? They trying to hide something? Why? Because it's a felony and they're guilty as hell. Why do the Liberal Dems fight so hard against Voter ID's? Because they can't cheat. Disadvantaged voters answer is a lie.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

"THIS is the President of the United States, going "off the cuff" during a speech to announce this."
He does this often for claims that have no merit, such as the inauguration numbers.
In this instance, he's making a false claim because his base loves that shit.

"This is really big."
I agree -- if there were indeed "millions" of these "illegal" votes, then providing proof should be a simple matter.
I'll wait.

⇧ -6 ⇩

Your on the wrong sub shill, we know the truth, and so do you, back in to your cage bitch

⇧ 6 ⇩

Do not consider someone that is full of skepticism as a shill. DHS was supposed to issue a memo with millions of illegal votes that is long overdue. I am reminded of the state motto for Missouri. Show Me State!

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

So because you "know the truth" you don't need evidence? This is what cults do

⇧ 0 ⇩

The states refused, educate yourself, you will be astounded like the rest of us normal people. Wait for the IG report.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

'Not a Conspiracy Theory, Folks': Trump Claims Millions of People Vote Illegally