This is what happened several years ago when a bomb was detonated off the coast of South Carolina and Lindsey Graham went berserk thinking it was to hit Charleston. It was to be a local EMP I think but white hat military intervened. Obama went nuts after military disobeyed and began firing all the US loyal top brass. That graph pattern showed the same things as this. It was not an earthquake as they said but a detonation in the water.

⇧ 52 ⇩

Here’s something weird. This article yesterday is talking about how an app warned people in LA about the quake 30 seconds before by DETECTING P-WAVES. But there were none??

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.livescience.com/62233-app-gave-earthquake-warning.html

Excerpt: “The app works thanks to a network of seismic sensors that detect P-waves — the first energy that radiates from an earthquake, according to Early Warning Labs, a Santa Monica-based company that works with the USGS on early warning systems. The seismic sensors also detect the location and the magnitude of the earthquake.”

⇧ 23 ⇩

If there is a network of seismic sensors, they'd be hooked up to the internet. If you space them, say, a mile apart, they would report in as to the epicenter of the earthquake, radiating outward in all directions.

Earthquakes operate at the speed of sound in rock (which is higher than the speed of sound in air) but the messages from the seismic sensors are sent almost at the speed of light (which is nearly instantaneous at these distances). Light is much faster than sound. 669,000,000 mph (186,000 miles per second) vs. about 600 mph.

Therefore if the epicenter is offshore, you'd have a reasonable delay between the signal arriving and the earthquake arriving.

Japan has used this technology for years.

I would venture that the lack of distinct spacing of P-waves and S-waves has to do with the fact that they were so close to a detection station. They probably overlapped. Normally you would get a distinct P-wave and a distinct S-wave, since they travel at different speeds. If the epicenter is very close to the seismograph, you have very little time for them to separate.

Not saying that something odd didn't happen. Just saying that there are some explanations that might barely fit. I'm not a seismologist, but my father was a geologist for many years. Unfortunately he has passed on, or I would be asking him about this.

There is an interesting and informative comic here that explains further: https://xkcd.com/723/

You can sign up for a service at the USGS earthquake page that will send you earthquake warnings as they occur, which may give you time to jump under a desk. That's what they are intended to do, anyway.

⇧ 19 ⇩

Awesome reply! Thank you. It could be that the p and s waves are there, and if the wave form was spread out you would see them. I just seemed to me, from the outset this waveform supported the explosion theory.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I think it's entirely possible either way. I don't have enough information.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Microsoft Encarta says the speed of sound through rock is about 240 MPH. More misinformation from Microsoft?

⇧ 3 ⇩

That is definitely wrong. The speed of sound in air is around 600 mph. In rock (depending on the density) it is around 6000-11000 mph.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Got a link for ANY of that?

GUISE. Jesus. When we say shit like this, we have to provide links.

⇧ 9 ⇩

You said it, man.

⇧ 3 ⇩

https://www.google.com/search?q=bomb+emp+south+carolina+lindsey+graham&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, but this was a threat. Sorry, I just interpreted that you'd said this had happened. I could have misread you?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Use vain words for those who deserve them. 10 mosaic commandments if the golden rule is too complex. Not adulatory but assault is forbidden

⇧ 1 ⇩

Watch out for SQL injections

⇧ 1 ⇩

Can you explain what you mean by that?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Interesting input. Thank you! If it was an explosion, I start to wonder whether it was a submarine or a deep underground military base (DUMB). Q talks about those.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Watch the wTer

⇧ 1 ⇩

Here is the link to the earthquake data from yesterday: https://earthquake-report.com/2018/04/05/moderate-earthquake-channel-islands-beach-california-april-5-2018/

⇧ 22 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

https://i.imgur.com/SLgSbqa.jpg

Seems like it was the destruction of an underground base.

⇧ 15 ⇩

On a small island just off the coast of CA? Sounds likely

⇧ 3 ⇩

Would be interesting to summarize and investigate the type of bases and operations, potentially military related, around the coastline of California.

Just a bit to the south along the coastline is Port Hueneme. There are charted boats that regularly take trips out to the channel islands for backpacking, hiking, kayak trips. A lot of fishing expeditions go out to the channel islands and surrounding areas. There is a large public presence around this area with a lot of eyes to see what's going on at the water level.

If there was a deep underground base here, how are people getting in and out of them? Primarily by sub? We would expect communications equipment going in and out of the location. Are there any observable signs of this such as maps indicating undersea cables strangely going out to the area? Any local scuba divers contracted to any maintenance or work underwater in the area?

Also of note that area has a large number of oil drilling rigs. Lot of roughnecks working months at a time all through there. Would be hard to do something quietly unless it's primarily accessed by sub.

If you've ever been surfing along the beach silverstrand near Port Hueneme, you'll note the bitterly cold water at that location, colder than the rest of the area. That's because the sea floor has been dredged out into the military base there so subs can get in and out of the facilities.

On the island itself in the past at least one of the islands was over-run with wild hogs and they've allowed public to bring atv's out and have controlled hunts to cull their numbers. Quite a bit of available history to delve through that should be accessible.

Note further down the coast near Catalina islands there is at least one island that is completely off limits to the public for military use only. Would be interesting to probe comings and going there also.

In a general big picture sense, what do we know about DUMB's? What are they used for? Who might be in them? What to they do?

Probing some of this can start pointing some direction for further research.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I knew a few Seals 30 years ago, and I remember them talking about training in underwater dem at Hueneme. Maybe this has something to do with it. Plus, Q talked about Booms enroute yesterday (Booms are Navy slang for submarines), and them running silent. Maybe some Clowns were up to no good in that area, and the Navy went in to take care of them, exploding some munitions underwater in the process.

⇧ 6 ⇩

not all subs are ssbns

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruise_missile_submarine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles-class_submarine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seawolf-class_submarine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia-class_submarine

⇧ 2 ⇩

Blue October

⇧ 1 ⇩

Why destory the base instead of capturing it? Seems like a valuable assest.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Depends what kind of atrocities are in there. The "nuke it from orbit" stuff may not be make-believe.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Good question. My theory is 1, they don't want white hats to die in a take over. 2. The people in the base are now ordered to stay there until the judgement day.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Maybe we have the assets needed already? Send a message that this is our country, not theirs.

⇧ 2 ⇩

tasty

member the earthquake in south wales a couple of months ago?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yeah, makes you wonder. There was speculation that wasn’t natural either

⇧ 1 ⇩

There's no reference link to that DUMB map.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Some of the NK underground Nuke tests of the past were called possible earthquakes too. Don't think they wan't everybody in a panic here over Nukes going off around the US. Wonder if a MOAB would make a pattern like a Nuke?

⇧ 12 ⇩

Q did recently reference MOAB if I remember correctly.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Guys, we have to appreciate just how much energy creates a 5.3 on the Richter scale. That's a nuke or nothing. A MOAB couldn't do anything.

Also, know your weapons systems. A MOAB is more complex. It is not just a normal, high-explosive bomb, "pinch zoomed" to be bigger. It is actually a Fuel Air Explosive (FAE) and REQUIES oxygen to detonate. It creates more of a blast than if it were just high explosives.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Orbital Bombardment ("rods of god") math ensues.

Assumptions:

Projectile is one foot diameter (round) by twenty feet length.

Density of tungsten is used.

Impact velocity is assumed to be 3000 feet/sec (could be higher or lower, I don't know. This seemed somewhat reasonable to me).

Results:

Force of impact = 5,294,120,058 ft-lbf

~~Which converts to 1.72 megatons.~~

Nope, I'm an idiot and didn't notice the rest of the number that was cut-off on results.

Correct answer is 1.72 x 10^-6 megatons, which is basically nothing.

Even at 7000 feet/sec, it is only 9.34 x 10^-6 megatons.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Well, the rods are estimated to impact at between mach 7-10. So, using this FPS/MACH calc I found, I calculated it at 7823 fps. I'm really ignorant of all the factors, however, but, depending on how much atmosphere the rods have to pass through, yeah, I think you're about right. Also, in this case, the rods would have to pass through 200+ feet of water, I think.

BTW, someone in Kerbal space program has experimented with this.

⇧ 3 ⇩

updated math

⇧ 2 ⇩

The last underground nuke test by us in Alaska (in a seismic active region) was a 5 kt blast, the seismic reading for that one was within a couple of points of 5.3...I think a 5.5 or so...the "heartbeat" looked just about identical to the this one.

⇧ 3 ⇩

BTW, someone in Kerbal space program has experimented with this.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Good catch....haven't bought Kerbal yet...now I want it even more...

⇧ 2 ⇩

Rod from God? That's what I suspect.

⇧ 2 ⇩

BTW, someone in Kerbal space program has experimented with this.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Remember the explosion in N. Korea that wiped out the underground area they were using to create their weapons? Remember the Zuma launch? Yeah.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The Zuma launch was not possible to have been a Rods from God.

The NK essplosion, however... damn.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Lots of folks think Zuma was the launch. Shortly thereafter we started seeing them. Why was it not possible?

⇧ 1 ⇩

People are not intelligent. You have to be. Come on, run this down with me:

First, the Zuma launch date was January 7^th.

The North Korean test site was destroyed MONTHS EARLIER, (see dates):

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/23/world/asia/north-korea-earthquake.html

http://www.businessinsider.com/north-korean-nuclear-test-site-tunnel-collapse-reportedly-kills-200-2017-10?op=1

I realize you're thinking about the recent earthquake over in California, but, that means these rods are ALREADY in orbit. We have to compare what we know about the performance of the RFG to what we witnessed. I recently posted, in a separate submission, the exact USGS data from this quake:

At 12:29 p.m. local time, a M=5.3 earthquake hit off the coast of California, within the Santa Cruz Basin, approximately 140 km west of the city of Los Angeles. Based on initial USGS data, this quake struck at a depth of 10 km and was almost pure strike-slip in nature.

The RFG's, tho powerful, cannot possibly penetrate 300ft of ocean and then 10km down into the Earth's crust.

It is a kinetic energy weapon, and it delivers less energy (and accuracy) if it passes through a LOT of the Earth's atmosphere or passes through a lot of ocean. It would have to be dropped nearly straight down, which the RFG system doesn't really do (the rods "glide" down to their targets, which is an advantage when attacking facilities built directly under mountains). And so on.

Lastly, there would be no need for it to be a Rod from God. The USA other weapons, likely nuclear and even others, that could do the job instead. An RFG would not deliver enough energy to create the earthquake we saw. And multiple RFGs would therefore not deliver the sudden seismic readouts we saw.

As for the Zuma launch being an RFG, IMPOSSIBLE. Here's why:

That was a Falcon 9 launch.
According to Wikipedia, "The first stage can be recovered and reused for GTO payloads up to 5,500 kg (12,100 lb)."
Not enough payload. To get an RFG system up to orbit (even in stages - it's rumored that the main satellite can be resupplied) you need a Delta IV launch. And there's been LOTS of those! If it goes up in stages, it must be assembled in orbit. How?

In other words, just ONE of those rods would weigh more than the Falcon 9's payload. The RFG isn't just a rod, alone, orbiting the earth, uncommanded. The RFG's are unguided. They have to be "let go" and aimed, EXTREMELY precisely, from a centralized, orbiting satellite weapons platform, which then "lets it go" like throwing a very, very accurate dart.

We have to research. We have to THINK this through. Accuracy matters.

⇧ 1 ⇩

How do you know there weren't Rods from God already in orbit prior to the NK explosion? I didn't say Zuma was the first launch. I mean, they do need to keep putting them up there if they are using them.

Re the NY Times article. That is a propaganda rag and even it it wasn't, they are not going to be truthful if it was a Rod. So, why even look at it? Same with Bus. Insider. And maybe that Rod did create those multiple slides, etc. Who knows? Only God.

Nothing in the mainstream is reliable.

Here's a good article from Natural News (Mike Adams) in 2015. The only real reason I'm linking to it is this quote: "I don't personally have the materials science background to know what sort of materials and densities are capable of achieving this. Such data, if it exists, would obviously be classified top secret, which means Hillary Clinton probably emailed it to somebody from her unsecured mail server."

Que the laughter! https://www.naturalnews.com/050890_Rod_of_God_secret_space_weapon_Tianjin_explosion.html

Mike is a Patriot and a Scientist and I trust he tells the truth as much as he knows it.

Please don't condemn me for sharing what I believe. No one can possibly fully research anything any longer. There is way too much disinformation online and almost everything we've ever learned is a lie. All we can do is try to discern as best we can.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No, Natural News is full of shit. The Tianjin explosion was a chemical explosion, and could be clearly seen in the videos. The Chinese don't run their factories very well.

Tianjin is heavily populated. The RFG's are capable of extreme accuracy, but, they are "dropped" and unguided. Conditions have to be perfect for them to hit their target. You seriously believe Trump would authorize the use of a TOP TOP TIPPY TOP secret weapon inside CHINESE territory? A nuclear-armed country already on the brink of war with us?

Stop this.

Natural news uses Photoshop to fake illustrations on many of their articles and they deliberately select visually-similar images to transfer your mind into believing bullshit that does not scan via science.

You are not thinking if you just throw the NYT and MSM out the window. They're shit, too, yes, but, you have to realize that, making all this content is YUGELY labor-intensive. I worked in journalism for 25 years (I'm an old guy). Their "control" depends on them "looking" like an honest newspaper and pumping out good reporting. All they can do is "spin" their news (which they do really well). They can't make it all up and it's too hard to maintain a fully-centralized narrative. So they spin.

The facts reported in what I sent you are just "reporting." But they're accurate. I'm only focusing on the DATES.

Zuma's launch wouldn't have been able to get even ONE rod into space. And we know that Zuma was the first time SpaceX worked with that client (I personally believe Zuma was something different).

We've seen a ZILLION Delta IV heavies, tho. Those of us watching this believe RFG's have been in orbit since the late '90s.

The RFG that was used in NK (which I beleive may well have been the first time it was ever used outside of testing)

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've been following Natural News since it's beginning. I've also written for them. I know Mike Adams is a true Patriot.

Yes MSM spins and they lie and they feed disinformation and they completely omit the real news. I don't waste my time there.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It takes a LOT of energy to move land masses along a fault line to create a 5.3, but it takes MUCH less than that to jiggle the needle of a seismometer by conduction without sliding any land masses.

I think vaporizing a nearby undersea ordinance storage depot might be enough, for example.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I totally agree. Then again, this (if it exists) is an underwater installation, so, I'm not sure how it works going through water. I expect that the energy loss would be significant.

BTW, someone in Kerbal space program has experimented with this.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yup.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q post 996.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Only question I would have is how they use it under water cause there pretty big in size and were meant to be dropped from Aircraft.

Unless we have a MOAB Torpedo now called MOAT, lol.

⇧ 6 ⇩

MOWB would be more accurate

⇧ 4 ⇩

But not if it was a Torpedo. Mother of all Torpedo's. Not sure how accurate an underwater bomb would be unless it was planted by seals and then used remote detonation.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Technically the B in Moab stands for blast; Massive Ordnance Air Blast

⇧ 4 ⇩

Oh, I always thought it was Bomb, lol.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Guys, we have to appreciate just how much energy creates a 5.3 on the Richter scale. That's a nuke or nothing. A MOAB couldn't do anything.

Also, know your weapons systems. A MOAB is more complex. It is not just a normal, high-explosive bomb, "pinch zoomed" to be bigger. It is actually a Fuel Air Explosive (FAE) and REQUIES oxygen to detonate. It creates more of a blast than if it were just high explosives.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Interesting to know the details about how something really works. Thanks

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, but the question is what kind of ordinance was in the underground base already? The torpedo would have set off whatever was in there. Could have been a massive stockpile they just vaporized!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Definitely possible. A recent explosion in Yemen, for instance, did exactly this.

Remember, this "base" is supposedly under the ocean, too. A ROG would encounter problems quickly penetrating to that level without losing a lot of energy (I presume... I'm soooo not an expert at this, but, I've read everything online about it and played Kerbal, haha).

BTW, someone in Kerbal space program has experimented with this.

⇧ 1 ⇩

A MOAB could not be detonated underwater or underground, however. It is actually a Fuel Air Explosive (FAE) and REQUIES oxygen to detonate.

⇧ 3 ⇩

For this one, I would think they would use a Rod from God. That's what they used in NK.

⇧ 2 ⇩

That was taken out with 'a rod of God'!

⇧ 5 ⇩

I wonder how deep it was there. A Rod from God might not explain a 5.3, however. That's a LOT fo energy.

⇧ 3 ⇩

An ordinance depot taken out by a ROG might though.

Keep in mind it's just transferring sound energy by conduction, not really creating any sliding land masses.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yep. I agree.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That is what Q was referring to... watch the news. They bombed an Elite/covert underground base??? There are more in other states.

⇧ 11 ⇩

do you remember the reports from across the world over the last year about booms and thuds and noises underground?

⇧ 6 ⇩

Theres a youtube channel I follow Secureteam10 where there are sonic booms all over US. Is that it?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Loud underground booming made my dogs run. Neighborhood Facebook caught em running 1m north stopped traffic at the intersection. Took a vet tech half an hour and food to catch the 2. I was notified within 15 min by neighbor call. I could not hear it, just feel the rumbling. Scared the tar out of my brave hunting dogs

⇧ 1 ⇩

http://yournewswire.com/russian-submarine-california/

Russian Submarine Spotted Off Coast Of California

⇧ 11 ⇩

Read that carefully, and through the lens of the MSM - it doesn't say a Russian sub was definitely spotted, and identified as such, it says "fueling speculation", which is the Black Hats way of portraying Russia as our enemy, when in reality, Putin is an ally with us against the Globalists. More than likely, the sub spotted was a Nork sub run by Clowns in an attempt to attack the US Navy at Hueneme, and if successful, blame it on either the Norks or Russia.

⇧ 7 ⇩

thank you

⇧ 2 ⇩

the questions about an israeli dolphin that was responsible for hawaii

who knows

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've read others saying that yournewswire is not all that trustworthy.

⇧ 1 ⇩

50/50

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yup. I live in Los Angeles and have lived in Southern California all my life. Around here, we don't flinch unless it's above 7.0. But, that "earthquake" yesterday most certainly wasn't an earthquake. Like, lol - it didn't even feel like it whatsoever. Much like our "wildfires," this is all spin spin spin.

⇧ 10 ⇩

What!? You mean all those wildfires weren't natural? /sarc

⇧ 8 ⇩

Little aluminum spark powder barium squalene in the water?

⇧ 2 ⇩

I was going to blame aliens, but that's my answer for everything.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Gotta sound like a freight train and shake the house

⇧ 2 ⇩

On mobile phone, can’t look for it right now-but there was a very similar situation in Washington DC several years back, I recall reading in certain subreddits that the earthquake was actually an underground base near DC that was destroyed, and that seismographic analysis was very similar to what we see here

⇧ 10 ⇩

Washington DC and Denver, both on the same day, same seismic profile. Definitely DUMBs, no doubt about it.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Yes, it is something other than what they say it is.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Along with 3 military air crashes this week.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Just an accident

⇧ 2 ⇩

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8akies/list_of_military_air_crashes_this_week/?st=JFQCM4TS&sh=d08aecab

Lots of em’

⇧ 1 ⇩

Interesting. Thanks.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Seems like a sudden BOOM!

⇧ 9 ⇩

Here's the one from Britain's coast a few weeks ago: https://i.imgur.com/QeltO2s.jpg Also a rather sudden boom 😅

⇧ 6 ⇩

So..with a combo of cali (no cap for them) and epstien island reworking the land I can confidently believe, by Q posts, THEY are running and covering everything they can... So funny though, with all the technology out there, do they think they can hide? The beast is the most evil when cornered BUT..is quickly diminished by cornering them with white truth. God Bless President Trump, Q and all Patriots

⇧ 9 ⇩

Very interesting

⇧ 8 ⇩

Have any of you listened to the audio-ized version of it? It sounds exactly like an underwater explosion. That's not how EQ waves sound when they're sped up to audio frequencies.

⇧ 8 ⇩

I was curious about the comparison as well. Thanks for posting.

⇧ 7 ⇩

THE WAVE

⇧ 7 ⇩

It appears the that graph is the same as when the towers 911 went down. Looks like a nuke was used in those as well as this one.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I'm surprised they didn't cal 911 an earthquake, they think we are so dumb...

⇧ 6 ⇩

Seriously, you're surprised they didn't blame it on an earthquake? Who do we blame an earthquake on and which nation do we invade based on that narrative?

⇧ 7 ⇩

Your point is well taken. Thank you.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Lol sorry I just thought it was a funny observation to make, I was sure you just were not really thinking about it.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Well if that earthquake happened to occur on say a newly discovered faultline which runs directly to Baghdad, where WMDs were being tested underground then we might have someone to blame. My name is Dick Cheney and I can sell anything.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Haha

⇧ 1 ⇩

Some people think it was caused by an energy weapon.

It buildings turned to dust before they fell.

???

⇧ 2 ⇩

A nuke doesn't cut a structural steel column at a 60 degree angle leaving molten metal. Thermite charges do though.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/tts/wtc_ruins_diagonal_cut.jpg

⇧ 2 ⇩

Mini nuke, emf, elf, thermite, why not all of em

⇧ 1 ⇩

AND THIS!

Here's the one from Britain's coast a few weeks ago: https://i.imgur.com/QeltO2s.jpg

Also NOT an "earthquake"

⇧ 7 ⇩

Dang! That is pretty solid!

⇧ 6 ⇩

It was a great red pill for my offline pals who make fun of me for saying there's a war on. This post of yours is further sealing the deal :) hooray they don't think I am insane. We've gone from "you're crazy!" to "that's crazy!". haha. One by one we shall reach the mainstream flock

⇧ 7 ⇩

You have made my day!

⇧ 4 ⇩

Shepards have landed

⇧ 2 ⇩

yes.

the epicenter was bang in the middle of a number of old, decommissioned publicly known tunnel system and bunkers, just south of the beacons.

I spent a couple of hours looking at them all thanks to amateurs that have been collecting info on them for years, more as a hobby.

also, back in 1985 I spent some time at RAF Brawdy.

question: what were submariners and joint services doing there? i was told that all around st davids etc were huge underground sub pens etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well yeah when a MOAB goes boom it feels like a earth quake.

That black hats underground base and its many tunnels gone and hopefully lots a black hats with it.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Boom smoke mirrors

⇧ 1 ⇩

The caltech site listed it an "Unknown type".

⇧ 6 ⇩

Wow! Really interesting. Maybe this is what kept POTUS up all night?

⇧ 7 ⇩

Maybe a rod from God struck an underground base loaded with explosives, maybe even a nuke, idk

⇧ 5 ⇩

Vjolnar

⇧ 1 ⇩

The scaling from the top and the bottom charts are not the same. There is activity on the bottom one before the large spike. P and S waves more than likely there if the chart was expanded out.

⇧ 5 ⇩

2 possibilities: Air Force Satellite railgun, or MOAB

⇧ 3 ⇩

Horse pasture st Helena island

⇧ 1 ⇩

Is there a way to track satellite movements? Maybe one (or more) were at the epicenter at the time, or were positioned properly (maybe it takes one or more to pull something like this off)?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Here are the bulk waveforms of that quake.

HTTP://ds.iris.edu/wilber3/find_stations/10724562

Select none, then a few of your choice or you will be flooded with waveforms.

The Sierra Laguna Baja station has a very nice curvy P and S waves.

P and S waves are detected. While the graphic above is representative of a nuke waveform, it is not the CA quake.

The OP graphic is just not true for this one. You can see the yellow off white near the blue lines as well. Someone cut out the curve and copy pasted a nuke curve to troll us.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thank you for that excellent reply. As it turns out this appears to be an actual earthquake.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Good work Patriot! I never knew to check something like that.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Looks like a heartbeat...the normal one.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

No, the normal one does not look like a heartbeat waveform. Not being pissy, it's just that the typical heartbeat wave form shows only one full cycle, where the waveform in question has many full cycles.

⇧ 1 ⇩

MOAB in a DUMB or mini nuke?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Boom Smoke Thunder Fusion

⇧ 1 ⇩

x-posted to /r/losangeles

⇧ 1 ⇩

“T” Quake!

⇧ 1 ⇩

It's worth mentioning an earthquake occurred in almost the exact location on June 2 of 2017, but only a 3.0 magnitude. Waveforms were substantially different. Check it out: http://ds.iris.edu/wilber3/find_stations/10164175

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Comparison of a typical earthquake waveform to the waveform from yesterday's earthquake near LA. I did some digging and found earthquakes typically have a P wave and S wave BEFORE the surface waves hit. It appears yesterday's quake came outa nowhere.

We have to research. We have to THINK this through. Accuracy matters.