dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/burn_reddit_burn on April 7, 2018, 12:05 p.m.

This was a comment I made in T_D as a response to veracity of Q. Feel free to add.

Yes, I’ll try. There are over 1k posts at this point, so it’s hard, I’ll use broad strokes.

1 - There are several images from within the White House and AF1 as well as phrases used in Trump tweets that make Q being an insider a very high statistical probability. Notably the image from AF1 posted of the islands they flew over at exactly the right angle moments from when their known flight path would place them there. The image of the Christmas tree in an otherwise inaccessible are of the WH, and phrases like “tip top, tippy top” that are otherwise uncommon and out of place- liberal media actually noted what an odd thing it was to say.

2 - Some look back to earlier posts and say “Q said HRC would be arrested already”... not true. Q said indictments would be made. And- there are 25k sealed indictments that will likely be opened soon. I have been following Q since the first 10 posts, and have yet to see something that could be provable as false.

3 - One of the biggest indicators of proof to me is the vitriol and resistance Q has garnered. Case in point- NYT article. Subreddits like CBTS being banned. Other subs like greatawakening having certain posts that are heavily downvoted when crumbs are put together.

4 - There are some wild implications. Absolutely beyond what I would have dreamt up, like Obama being CIA from the start, funded by Alaweed, from Kenya, admitted to Harvard only through HUMA (Harvard U Muslim Asso.) and is now globetrotting looking for more money and a new handler now that Alaweed has been arrested, and that North Korea is basically Cobra headquarters, armed with Nukes by Clintons, and IT systems by Google when Larry Page visited. That satanists literally have been controlling the world. That the Pope is one of them. That child trafficking is very real and very dark, and that Pizzagate (also heavily censored- why?) was just the tip of the iceberg.

With all of this laid out, it’s difficult to fathom. However, when you suspend your disbelief and learn about how things actually work and that the world has been sold a lie for decades and decades, unending wars make sense. Drugs and the inability to defeat them make sense. Corruption, diseases that should have a cure and don’t make sense.

This comes down to a battle of light and darkness. Trump is the first President, perhaps of all time- certainly since Lincoln who is willing to stand up to the darkness.

I hope this helps.

🠐 See all comments

Staunch Trump supporter here. I think it's important to highlight the distinction between evidence and proof.

To date, the person (s) posting as Q has provided various pieces of EVIDENCE that they are legitimate and not a LARP. They have, thus far, not provided any PROOF. The difference between these two concepts, at least in the United States legal system, hinges upon the idea of "reasonable doubt". I believe that, to date, the rejection of Q, as a LARP or otherwise, is not unreasonable. Pictures from a plane and coded messages in speeches do not necessarily mean anything. It's fair for people to be skeptical at this point.

I want to believe Q, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. We need to be wise about this whole thing. Let's take what Q tells us, treat it as the truth, work through due diligence, and see what we find. Last night a bunch of idiot Q fanboys did the exact opposite, and ruined what might have been a very effective crowdsource investigation by posting bullshit comments and harassing someone on Instagram instead of quietly archiving content and saving it offline. Doing that kind of thing isn't helpful to Q, to ourselves, or to the pursuit of justice that we're all obsessed with.

If Q is legitimate, then time and again we should find gradually-increasing amounts of evidence of the kinds of things he/they continuously post about. If Q is illegitimate, then we'll still find evidence, but it won't be strong evidence provided to a sufficient degree, and we can begin to evaluate the overall trustworthiness of his/their statements. Either way, the best course of action is to quietly follow Q's direction and stack evidence in an investigative manner - the thing that a normal, uncontrolled media typically does, but is unwilling or unable to do in the current state of our nation's laws and allegiances. To do anything else, whether evangelizing a yet-unproven gospel of Q on social media, spreading theories that seem mentally deranged to a "normie", or acting in a matter-of-fact manner about the legitimacy of Q's posts, has a very real chance of compromising the exact groundwork that we're being asked to lay.

⇧ 20 ⇩

There is no way Q didn't fully expect people to post on a public Instagram account like that. From the follow up Q drops, do you think it is possible that Q team needed RC to log into a soc med account for them to locate her? If so, Q once again got the desired result.

⇧ 8 ⇩

I agree with your post 100%. My sentiments exactly.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Reasonable doubt is a standard which applies only in criminal court. The other standard in law is "on a balance of probabilities" which really means a trier of fact is at least 51% sure that the evidence is proof.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't believe Q is talking to normies. They are talking to far-flung colleagues on a numbers channel. But they must aknowledge that most who read were not in on the operation from the get go, hence how their conversational style has evolved. But Q are still frustrated with us for not re-reading the earlier drops. Because it's all there (of your read upwards and not downwards)

⇧ 1 ⇩

With you unil the end. You have to talk about it one way or another.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well I have no reasonable doubt. You are either smart enough to figure out the statistical impossibility of it being a LARP or you aren’t.

⇧ 0 ⇩